Tricellaria porteri ( MacGillivray, 1889 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930050144828 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10237789 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039F87FA-FF8D-3B0D-FEA1-EDBAFDD2FC53 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Tricellaria porteri ( MacGillivray, 1889 ) |
status |
|
Tricellaria porteri ( MacGillivray, 1889) View in CoL
Tricellaria porteri View in CoL , which is, to date, only known from southern Australia, was highlighted by Occhipinti Ambrogi and d’ Hondt (1994) as a possible senior synonym of T. inopinata View in CoL . The original description of Menipea porteri by MacGillivray (1889) refers to the presence of reniform (kidney-shaped) scuta, variable internode lengths and bi fi d spines. It also refers to the ovicell pores as forming a single transverse row. We have examined paratype specimens of T. porteri , all from South Australia (including slides 65508, 65509, Rev. Porter collection; 65511, 65513, Museum of Victoria, Melbourne) and have come to the conclusion that this taxon is morphologically differentiable from the other two taxa. The most striking characteristic is the consistently large and highly reniform scuta, quite unlike those encountered in the other two taxa (fi gure 2). Only a small minority of scuta bear irregular margins. We observed 3-13 autozooids per internode and proximal external bi fi d spines on many autozooids. Lateral avicularia were sparsely present. We found the arrangement of ovicell pores to be very variable, usually scattered but occasionally forming a row in the manner described by MacGillivray (1889).
Two recent published descriptions from South Australia attributed to T. porteri present di ffi culties. Bock (1982) made reference to variable internodes and`ovate’ scuta (but fi gured more irregularly-shaped ones) and made no mention of bi fi d spines. This material needs re-appraising. Brock (1985) fi gured a variety of scuta morphologies and some bi fi d spines. The former is only consistent with our characterization of T. inopinata View in CoL . A more recent study makes reference to the presence of T. porteri as a fouling species in Port Kembla, New South Wales ( Moran and Grant, 1993) although the information provided is insu ffi cient to con fi rm its identity according to the criteria de fi ned here.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |