Paralaubuca harmandi Sauvage, 1883

Tangjitjaroen, Weerapongse, Randall, Zachary S., Yang, Lei, Grudpan, Chaiwut & Page, Lawrence M., 2025, Taxonomic revision of Paralaubuca (Cypriniformes, Xenocyprididae), a taxon seemingly in decline, Zootaxa 5647 (4), pp. 301-330 : 322-323

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5647.4.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0055D1A9-2ACE-4C8D-91C4-C7DC5E3AB99C

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039D87EC-4519-0630-FCDD-FE7A37EAE478

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Paralaubuca harmandi Sauvage, 1883
status

 

Paralaubuca harmandi Sauvage, 1883 View in CoL

( Figures 1 View FIGURE 1 , 5 View FIGURE 5 , 10 View FIGURE 10 )

Paralaubuca Harmandi Sauvage, 1883:153 View in CoL . Type locality: Thailand: Mé-Nam (Chao Phraya).

Holotype: MNHN A-6427.

Culter siamensis Hora, 1923:149 View in CoL , pl. 10 fig. 1, pl. 11 figs. 4–5. Type locality: Thailand: Bangkok.

Holotype: ZSI F 10504 /1.

Culter wolfi Fowler, 1937:163 View in CoL , fig. 101. Type locality: Thailand: Pitsanulok. Holotype: ANSP

68016.

Paralaubuca harmandi was described by Sauvage in 1883 based on a single specimen ( Figure 10A View FIGURE 10 ) from the Chao Phraya River, Thailand having 7 branched dorsal-fin rays, 24 branched anal-fin rays, and 75 lateral-line scales. Bănărescu (1971) examined the holotype and noted it measured 147 mm SL .

Culter siamensis View in CoL was described by Hora (1923) based on a single specimen measuring 175 mm SL ( Figure 10B View FIGURE 10 ) from Bangkok, with 9 (=7 branched) dorsal-fin rays, 24 branched anal-fin rays, 13 pectoral-fin rays, and 75 lateral-line scales. Hora (1923) also gave a count of 7 pelvic-fin rays, which perhaps was an error or based on an aberrant specimen, given the otherwise consistent count of 9 pelvic-fin rays in Paralaubuca View in CoL . We agree with Bănărescu (1971) that C. siamensis View in CoL is a synonym of P. harmandi View in CoL .

Culter wolfi View in CoL was described by Fowler (1937) from the Chao Phraya basin at Pitsanulok, Thailand. The holotype ( Figure 10C View FIGURE 10 ) measured 205 mm TL, and four paratypes measured 123–185 mm TL. The five specimens had 7 branched dorsal-fin rays, 14 pectoral-fin rays, 9 pelvic-fin rays, and 22–23 branched anal-fin rays. The lateral-line scale count was given as “23 to 25 (overlap 5 to 10, and sometimes auxiliary median series of 8 scales may be interposed) + 53 to 55 + 7 to 9 in lateral line.” We interpret this to mean lateral-line scales in a single row would number at least 73 and possibly as many as 84. Fowler noted C. wolfi View in CoL was similar to C. siamensis View in CoL but differed in having the pectoral fins longer than the head. Bănărescu (1971) examined the holotype and paratypes of C. wolfi View in CoL , which he considered a synonym of P. harmandi View in CoL , and other specimens he assigned to P. harmandi View in CoL to describe the species as having 7 branched dorsal-fin rays, 21–25 branched anal-fin rays, 70–86 lateral-line scales, and 26–33 rakers on the first gill arch. We found the holotype has 80 and paratypes have 73–80 lateral-line scales and agree with Bănărescu (1971) that C. wolfi View in CoL is a synonym of P. harmandi View in CoL .

Diagnosis. Paralaubuca harmandi is distinguished from P. typus and P. barroni by having 70–87 vs. 68 or fewer lateral-line scales, usually 22–24 vs. 24–29 branched anal-fin rays, 26–33 (usually 28–32) vs. 20–28 (usually 26 or fewer) scales around caudal peduncle, and total vertebral counts of 41–42 (average=41.9, n=9) vs. 38–41 (average=39.3, n=21) in P. typus ; and 38–41 (average=39.9, n=7) in P. barroni . Paralaubuca harmandi has shorter anal fin and anal-fin base, and smaller eye than P. typus and P. barroni ( Table 9). It is further differentiated from P. typus by having 29–33 vs. 31–51 rakers on first gill arch. Paralaubuca harmandi is distinguished from P. typus and P. barroni osteologically as described above and as shown in Figure 5 View FIGURE 5 . Reaching 265 mm SL, P. harmandi is much larger than both P. typus and P. barroni , which reach 152.5 and 115.0 mm SL, respectively.

Description. See description of genus.

Distribution. Paralaubuca harmandi is known from the Chao Phraya and Mae Klong River basins of Thailand, and the Mekong River basin of Cambodia and Thailand ( Figure 8B View FIGURE 8 ). Observations and collections of the species have been in flowing water in moderate to large rivers. Paralaubuca harmandi occurs syntopically with P. typus , both species having been collected at six of the 13 localities documented for P. harmandi .

Based on specimens in institutional collections, P. harmandi is known to be widespread in the Chao Phraya basin, occurring as far north as the Ping River in Chiang Mai Province and south to Bangkok, but appears to be relatively uncommon. In the Mae Klong River basin, it was recorded in Kanchanaburi Province in 1963 ( Johnsen 1963) and in Ratchaburi Province ( UMMZ 195277 View Materials ) in 1964. The species may have been extirpated from the Mae Klong basin, perhaps because of the massive dams on the mainstem and on each of its primary tributaries, the Khwae Noi and Khwae Yai .

Several publications have implied P. harmandi is widespread in the Mekong River basin, but the only verified records known to us are from two localities, the Mun River near Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand (NIFI 00068, UF 249816, UMMZ 195744), and Prek Andor, Cambodia (MNHN-IC-1983-0170). Bănărescu (1971) indicated the distribution of P. harmandi as Menam [= Chao Phraya] and Mekong drainages in Thailand, but all specimens listed by him were from the Chao Phraya basin. Taki (1974) did not include P. harmandi among the four names he used for species of Paralaubuca from Laos. Rainboth (1996) mentioned P. harmandi as being in the lower Mekong but provided no locality records and included a drawing of Culter siamensis from Hora (1923), who described C. siamensis from Bangkok, drained by the Chao Phraya River. Kottelat (2001) reported P. harmandi from the Mekong of Cambodia, Laos, and Thailand, but provided no locality records, and the photo on page 67 purported to be of P. harmandi is a photo of P. typus or P. barroni . So et al. (2019) did not include P. harmandi in a field guide to fishes of Cambodia. Rainboth et al. (2012) included a photo of P. harmandi in a photographic atlas of fishes of the Mekong, but the specimen in the photo was noted as having been from Chainat, Thailand on the Chao Phraya River. Vidthayanon (2008) described the distribution of P. harmandi as middle to lower Mekong and Chao Phraya basins and included the same photo as that in Rainboth et al. (2012) from the Chao Phraya River. Panitvong (2022) reported P. harmandi from the Chao Phraya and Mekong River basins and included a photo of P. harmandi from Phitsanulok (personal communication) on the Chao Phraya River. Taki et al. (2021) noted that no specimens conforming to P. harmandi were found in the Mekong River basin in surveys spanning seven years. Paralaubuca harmandi has not been collected in the Mekong River basin since the 1960s and may be extirpated from the basin. If gone from the Mae Klong and Mekong River basins, the species occurs now only in the Chao Phraya River basin.

MNHN

Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Order

Cypriniformes

Family

Cyprinidae

Genus

Paralaubuca

Loc

Paralaubuca harmandi Sauvage, 1883

Tangjitjaroen, Weerapongse, Randall, Zachary S., Yang, Lei, Grudpan, Chaiwut & Page, Lawrence M. 2025
2025
Loc

Culter wolfi

Fowler, H. W. 1937: 163
1937
Loc

Culter siamensis

Hora, S. L. 1923: 149
1923
Loc

Paralaubuca Harmandi

Sauvage, H. - E. 1883: 153
1883
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF