Anadolua burri Karabağ, 1952
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5687.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:26BCEC61-944B-4392-90E0-41CD19B5640A |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039B8758-BB7D-FF85-FF0C-D195F514E7A6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Anadolua burri Karabağ, 1952 |
status |
|
Anadolua burri Karabağ, 1952 View in CoL sp. rev.
( Figs. 161–162 View FIGURES 147–172. 147–148 )
Anadolua bergeri Şirin, Sevgili and Taylan, 2024 View in CoL syn. nov.
Material examined. Turkey: Konya Prov., Derebucak-İbradı, Kimyos Ovası üzeri, 1850 m, 37°18.159´N, 31°29.632´E, 20.8.2018, 1 male (in alcohol) GoogleMaps ; Antalya Prov., Serik, Burmahan, Dermebeli , 1955 m, 37°13.646´N, 31°20.251´E, 19.8.2018, 2 males, 1 female, (1 male nymph) in alcohol GoogleMaps ; Antalya Prov., GündoğmuŞ, Geyik Dağları, Karabul-Namaras , 2120 m, 36°56.877´N, 32°04.601´E, 21.8.2018, 3 males in alcohol GoogleMaps ; Antalya Prov., GündoğmuŞ, Geyik Dağları, Susambeli , 2270 m, 36°55.053´N, 32°04.546´E, 21.8.2018, 1 male, 1 female, (1 male nymph) (in alcohol) GoogleMaps ; Mersin Prov., Çamlıyayla, Bolkar Dağı, SubaŞı , 2875 m, 31.8.2018, 1 female in alcohol ; Mersin Prov., Tırtar Köyü, Dümbelek yolu, 2035 m, 29.8.2018, 1 female in alcohol; 2117 m, 37°03.865´N, 34°18.275´E, 29.8.2018, 7 males, 4 females (in alcohol); 2130 m, 29.8.2018, 1 female in alcohol (leg. M. Ünal ) ( AİBÜEM) GoogleMaps .
Remarks. Şirin et al. (2024) synonymized A. burri with A. schwarzi based on morphological and song characteristics. The primary reason for this synonymy was the specimens collected from the type locality of A. burri in Denizli, Babadağ, during two visits by Şirin et al. (pers. Commun. D. Şirin). They misidentified these specimens as A. burri when in fact they belonged to A. schwarzi . Due to this misinterpretation, Şirin et al. synonymized A. burri with A. schwarzi . However, it is noteworthy that both A. burri and A. schwarzi were found together at the type locality of A. burri in Babadağ ( Karabağ 1952; Ünal 2018: 14), a fact that Şirin et al. (2024) did not take into account, despite citing these records. Furthermore, they identified and described a new species, A. bergeri , from populations of the true A. burri , which were collected from Rezebeli (Konya: SeydiŞehir, TaraŞçı) and Susambeli (Antalya, GündoğmuŞ).
Alongside the records of A. schwarzi and A. burri in Babadağ, similar syntopies are also observed in various locations. For example, A. schwarzi and A. burri were found as congeneric partners in Gömbe, Antalya ( Ünal 2018: 14). Additionally, A. schwarzi and A. davisi were recorded in Bozdağ, İzmir ( Karabağ 1952; Ünal 2018), which is the type locality for A. davisi .
Ünal (2018: 15) identified A. burri View in CoL in both localities of A. bergeri, Rezebeli and Susambeli. According View in CoL to Şirin et al. (2024: 226), they examined photographs of the male holotype and one female paratype of A. burri View in CoL ; however, it appears that the images they reviewed were not clear enough to draw a conclusion. In contrast, the author of the present paper thoroughly studied and compared all available material, including the type specimens of A. schwarzi View in CoL and A. rammei View in CoL at the Museum für Naturkunde (MfN), as well as A. burri View in CoL and A. davisi View in CoL at the Natural History Museum (NHM) ( Ünal 2018).
As demonstrated in Figures 157–158 and 161–162 View FIGURES 147–172. 147–148 of the current paper, alongside the figures from Ünal (2018), it is evident that A. schwarzi View in CoL and A. burri View in CoL are two distinct species within the genus. The holotype (male) of A. burri View in CoL , collected from Babadağ (Denizli) (NHM), can be clearly distinguished from the holotype of A. schwarzi View in CoL (MfN) and the single male of A. schwarzi View in CoL , also collected from Babadağ (NHM).
When comparing figures 25 and 221 from Ünal (2018), the latter belonging to the holotype of A. burri , with Fig. 9j View FIGURES 1–32. 1–2 of A. bergeri from Şirin et al. (2024), it becomes apparent that the male cercus is identical. Anadolua burri possesses unique morphological characteristics, such as seen in the male cercus ( Fig. 161 View FIGURES 147–172. 147–148 ), titillators ( Fig. 162 View FIGURES 147–172. 147–148 ), and the female subgenital plate. Additionally, all the other populations given in Ünal (2018) are recognizable. Therefore, Anadolua burri is validated as a species, while Anadolua bergeri is considered a junior synonym of it.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Anadolua burri Karabağ, 1952
Ünal, Mustafa 2025 |
Ünal 2025 |
Ünal 2025 |
Ünal 2025 |
Anadolua bergeri Şirin, Sevgili and Taylan, 2024
Sirin, Sevgili and Taylan 2024 |
A. burri
Karabag 1952 |
A. burri
Karabag 1952 |
A. burri
Karabag 1952 |
A. davisi
Karabag 1952 |
A. burri
Karabag 1952 |
A. burri
Karabag 1952 |
A. schwarzi
Ramme 1939 |
A. schwarzi
Ramme 1939 |
A. schwarzi
Ramme 1939 |
A. schwarzi
Ramme 1939 |
Scotodrymadusa
Ramme 1939 |