Nephoptera (Erdemia) hackeri ( Harz, 1988 ), 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5687.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:26BCEC61-944B-4392-90E0-41CD19B5640A |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039B8758-BB69-FFA9-FF0C-D5B3F4B3E0E3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Nephoptera (Erdemia) hackeri ( Harz, 1988 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Nephoptera (Erdemia) hackeri ( Harz, 1988) comb. nov.
( Figs. 18–21 View FIGURES 1–32. 1–2 )
Phaneroptera (Erdemia) erdemi Koçak et Kemal, 2009 View in CoL syn. nov.
Harz, 1988: 137 as Phaneroptera hackeri View in CoL ; Koçak et Kemal, 2009: 6 as Phaneroptera (Erdemia) hackeri View in CoL and Phaneroptera (Erdemia) erdemi View in CoL (Holotype: female); Taylan et al., 2021: 51 as Phaneroptera (Erdemia) hackeri View in CoL .
Type locality. SE Turkey, 12 km from Hakkari. Holotype. male ( MHNG).
Holotype of Phaneroptera erdemi . female ( CESA).
Material examined. TURKEY, Şırnak, BeytüŞŞebab, Günyüzü , 1374 m, 6.9.2013, 1 female (leg. M. Ünal ) ( AİBÜEM) .
Distribution. SE Turkey, 12 km from Hakkari [unknown direction] (type locality) ( Harz 1988); Siirt: Şirvan (type locality of P. erdemi ) ( Koçak et Kemal 2009); Hakkari: Çukurca, DemirtaŞ (Taylan et al. 2021); Şırnak: BeytüŞŞebab (present paper).
Remarks. Koçak and Kemal (2009) considered that the male of Phaneroptera (Erdemia) erdemi is very similar to that of P. hackeri . Therefore, they did not provide any diagnosis of the male sex, and described only the female (comparing P. hackeri ) as a new species. However, the female allotype of P. hackeri does not belong to this species (and genus), which is re-identified as Phaneroptera nana nana here (see above). Thus, Koçak and Kemal (2009) actually described the female of P. hackeri .
Phaneroptera and Nephoptera species can be found syntopically, as in this example, in Hakkari Province, Nephoptera hackeri and Phaneroptera nana . Another example, Nephoptera tibialis , Nephoptera persica , and Phaneroptera gracilis were found in the same location, 22 km N of Bandar-Abbas, in Iran ( Kaltenbach 1980: 580–581).
This species is most closely related to N. robusta by the shape of the ovipositor, which is only known from the female.
Subgenus Exonephoptera Ünal , subgen. nov.
Type species: Nephoptera sinica Steinmann, 1966 View in CoL
Description. Fastigium of vertex broad, slightly narrower than antennal scape. Eyes oval ( Figs. 24, 28 View FIGURES 1–32. 1–2 ). Pronotum ( Figs. 22–24 View FIGURES 1–32. 1–2 ) without lateral carinae; antero-ventral corner or paranota broadly rounded; shoulder incision deep and rounded. Tegmina ( Figs. 22, 23 View FIGURES 1–32. 1–2 ) fully developed; wings longer than tegmina. Basal part of fore tibia with open and oval tympanal organ ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 1–32. 1–2 ) on both sides. Fore and mid tibia with a longitudinal groove on dorsal side; mid tibia slightly widened in the basal part. Hind tibia with 2 apical spurs, both on dorsal and ventral sides. Hind femur with ventral spines. Male cercus ( Figs. 24, 32 View FIGURES 1–32. 1–2 ) long, cylindrical, almost the same width along its length, apex blunt, without an apical denticle; strongly and roundly incurved along its length, almost C-shaped; Last abdominal tergite ( Figs. 24, 26, 32 View FIGURES 1–32. 1–2 ) short and wide, posterior margin truncate. Male subgenital plate ( Figs. 25, 31, 32 View FIGURES 1–32. 1–2 ) long, strongly widened in basal part; apical part narrow, with a shallow posterior incision between two short lateral lobes, with very long styli which are almost 1/3 of the plate length. Ovipositor ( Figs. 26, 30 View FIGURES 1–32. 1–2 ) long, longer than twice as long as pronotum; strongly upcurved like a quarter circle.
Remarks. This new subgenus is a member of the tribe Phaneropterini as indicated by the following: fully developed tegmina, hind wings longer than tegmina, the exposed and oval tympanal organ on both sides of the tibia at the base, and the deep shoulder incision on the pronotum. It is included in Nephoptera by the broad fastigium of vertex, the male cercus (cylindrical, almost same width along its length or slightly widened apically; without apical denticle and with blunt apex) ( Figs. 4, 8, 9, 16, 18, 24, 32 View FIGURES 1–32. 1–2 ), the hind tibia with 2 spurs on dorsal and ventral sides, the mid tibia slightly widened in basal part, the long ovipositor, more than twice as long as the length of the pronotum. It is easily separated from the new transferred subgenus Erdemia by the short and wide last tergite of the male which is not developed posteriorly. It is different from both the nominotypical subgenus and Erdemia by the characters given in the key above. Its known distribution is also separated from the others.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Nephoptera (Erdemia) hackeri ( Harz, 1988 )
Ünal, Mustafa 2025 |
Phaneroptera (Erdemia) erdemi Koçak et Kemal, 2009
Kocak et Kemal 2009 |
Phaneroptera (Erdemia) erdemi
Kocak et Kemal 2009 |
Phaneroptera hackeri
Harz 1988 |
Phaneroptera (Erdemia) hackeri
Harz 1988 |
Phaneroptera (Erdemia) hackeri
Harz 1988 |