Microphorella gilaensis, Brooks & Cumming, 2025

Brooks, Scott E. & Cumming, Jeffrey M., 2025, Revision of the Microphorella acroptera species group and establishment of the Microphorella arcana species group (Diptera: Dolichopodidae sensu lato: Parathalassiinae), Zootaxa 5661 (4), pp. 451-503 : 497-498

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5661.4.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F9498ECE-DED3-46F1-A7D3-1E726D1D11A0

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16606034

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039A87AB-FFF9-FFFC-FF42-FCA823B7F0A9

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Microphorella gilaensis
status

sp. nov.

Microphorella gilaensis sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:F6C662D7-E2DA-493F-8AA1-FF1B553A7DB4

( Figs 110, 111 View FIGURES 110–111 , 115 View FIGURE 115 )

Type material. HOLOTYPE, ♂ labelled: “Globe Ariz| 13 Apr. 35| ALMelander”; “ALMelander| Collection| 1961”; “ CNC | 1155803”; “ HOLOTYPE | Microphorella | gilaensis | Brooks & Cumming” [red label] ( USNM) . PARATYPES: USA: Arizona: Gila County: same data as holotype [33°23'59"N 110°46'54"W] (4♀, USNM) GoogleMaps .

Diagnosis. Males of this species can be distinguished from other members of the M. arcana species group by the following features: mid femur with cluster of 6 long basiventral setae (similar to Fig. 106 View FIGURES 106–109 ), hind femur with posterior patch of setae relatively sparse and not brush-like (similar to Fig. 107 View FIGURES 106–109 ), abdominal sternite 5 without transverse row of long curved setae, abdominal sternite 6 without bulbous projection, hypopygium with dorsal surstylus lacking claw-like process adjacent to cercus and hypandrium not strongly produced posteriorly ( Figs 110, 111 View FIGURES 110–111 ).

Description. Male ( Figs 110, 111 View FIGURES 110–111 ): Wing length 1.8 mm. Similar to M. ovata sp. nov. except as follows: Head: Antenna with arista-like stylus longer, about 3× length of postpedicel. Thorax: Acrostichal setae absent; 5 dorsocentrals; scutellum of holotype with setae broken off. Legs: Hindleg: Femur with setae of anteroventral row subequal to femur width, posterior surface without mound-like swelling, cluster of setae less dense, basiventral surface below and proximal to cluster with fewer and shorter setae. Wing: As in description of M. acroptera . Abdomen: Hypopygium ( Figs 110, 111 View FIGURES 110–111 ): Left epandrial lamella ( Fig. 110 View FIGURES 110–111 ) with ventral epandrial process longer, narrower in middle portion, with short dorsal setae closer to base, apex enlarged and bifurcate. Dorsal lobe of left surstylus digitiform with strong apical seta, dorsal margin with weak setulose bump adjacent to cercus, lacking claw-like process. Ventral lobe of left surstylus with upper medial prensiseta flared apically and lacking bifurcation, lower medial prensiseta with flared, truncate apex. Right epandrial lamella ( Fig. 111 View FIGURES 110–111 ) with ventral epandrial process narrowed apically, tip not laterally flattened. Dorsal lobe of right surstylus broad with rounded apical margin bearing 2 setae (upper one missing in unique holotype), dorsal margin broadly hump-like posterior to cercus, lacking claw-like process. Hypandrium ( Figs 110, 111 View FIGURES 110–111 ) smaller, not strongly produced posteroventrally, with only short projection posterodorsally. Phallus ( Fig. 110 View FIGURES 110–111 ) trifurcate, with large curved acuminate process about 2/3 as long as distal portion of phallus and shorter spine-like process. Hypoproct with lobes large, rounded and strongly projected dorsally. Cercus small, short and rounded with several setae, left and right lobes symmetrical.

Female. Similar to male except as follows: Head: Face broader, tapered ventrally to about 3× width of anterior ocellus. Thorax: Acrostichal setae present, sparse and irregular, or biserial; 2–3 notopleurals; scutellum with 1 long seta and 1 small outer seta per side. Legs: Midleg: Femur unmodified, without cluster of long basiventral setae. Hindleg: Femur without cluster of setae on posterior surface. Abdomen: As in description of M. acroptera .

Distribution and seasonal occurrence. This new species is known only from Globe, Gila County, Arizona, where the type series was collected in April of 1935 ( Fig. 115 View FIGURE 115 ).

Etymology. This species is named after Gila County in Arizona.

CNC

Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes

USNM

Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Dolichopodidae

Genus

Microphorella

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF