Aname robertsorum, Raven, 1985
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2025.985.2845 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6F0815FE-5CA2-4254-8638-9E59E04C349B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15190990 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038B878B-FFD5-2116-FDF5-FDFCCE6961AB |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Aname robertsorum |
status |
|
Aname robertsorum View in CoL -complex
Figs 1 View Fig , 3D View Fig , 5D View Fig , 9 View Fig , 56–63 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig
Remarks
See the key to complexes and Figures 3–5 View Fig View Fig View Fig for diagnostic information. In life, spiders of the robertsorum - complex have a dark carapace and chelicerae, a brown abdomen, and bicoloured legs, with dark femora and light orange distal segments and coxae ( Fig. 9 View Fig ). Females of the robertsorum -complex generally have reflective bronze setae on the carapace and dorsal abdomen and may also have slight banding on the dorsal abdomen ( Fig. 9 View Fig ). Male colour and setation in life is unknown. Spiders of this complex generally make an open, silk-lined burrow without silk outside of the entrance, with the entrance often on an angle, and with a hidden secondary ‘wishbone’ entrance. The burrows are sometimes found in areas with a leaf-litter layer, and indeed the entrance may be somewhat embedded in the leaf-litter ( Fig. 9 View Fig ).
Distribution
The robertsorum -complex is currently known only from north Queensland, in the Einasleigh Uplands and Wet Tropics bioregions. Species tend to have quite small natural ranges.
Composition
The robertsorum -complex includes six described species: Aname calida sp. nov., A. carina Raven, 1985 , A. cassowariensis sp. nov., A. harmoniosa sp. nov., A. robertsorum Raven, 1985 , and A. tropicana sp. nov.. Juveniles of another putative species, here called Aname sp. “ravenshoe” are included in our phylogeny ( Fig. 1 View Fig ), and the map for this complex ( Fig. 9 View Fig ) but the species cannot be described due to the lack of adult specimens.
Key to species in the Aname robertsorum View in CoL -complex
Note: females are unknown for A. calida sp. nov., A. cassowariensis sp. nov., A. harmoniosa sp. nov., and A. robertsorum View in CoL .
1. Male ................................................................................................................................................... 2
– Female................................................................................................................................................ 7
Males
2. Embolus length>2 × bulb length ( Figs 57 View Fig , 60–61 View Fig View Fig ) .......................................................................... 3
– Embolus shorter ( Figs 56 View Fig , 59 View Fig , 62 View Fig ) ..................................................................................................... 5
3. Tibia I distance from proximal end to spur ~ 0.7 × tibia I length ( Fig. 57 View Fig ) ..... A. carina Raven, 1985 View in CoL
– Tibial spur closer to proximal end of tibia I (distance from proximal end to spur <0.6 × tibia I length) ................................................................................................................................................ 4
4. Metatarsus I excavation length ~ 0.55 × metatarsus I length; embolus more sinuous ( Fig. 60 View Fig ) .......................................................................................................... A. harmoniosa sp. nov.
– Metatarsus I with a shorter proximal excavation (~0.44 × metatarsus I length) and embolus straighter ( Fig. 61 View Fig ) ................................................................................................ A. robertsorum Raven, 1985 View in CoL
5. Metatarsus I length <4 × width ( Fig. 62 View Fig ) ........................................................... A. tropicana sp. nov.
– Metatarsus I thinner ........................................................................................................................... 6
6. Palp tibia length ~2.6 × width ( Fig. 56 View Fig ) .................................................................. A. calida sp. nov.
– Palp tibia less elongate (length ~2.3 × width) ( Fig. 59 View Fig )............................ A. cassowariensis sp. nov.
Females
7. Spermathecae medial vesicle length about equal to lateral vesicle length ( Fig. 58 View Fig ) ........................... ......................................................................................................................... A. carina Raven, 1985 View in CoL
– Spermathecae with shorter medial vesicles (~0.7 × lateral vesicle length) ( Fig. 63 View Fig ) ......................... ............................................................................................................................ A. tropicana sp. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.