Aname aurensis, Wilson & Harvey & Simmons & Rix, 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2025.985.2845 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6F0815FE-5CA2-4254-8638-9E59E04C349B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15190966 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038B878B-FFB0-2177-FD1A-FA31CE456379 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Aname aurensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Aname aurensis sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:3DE17C41-ABD3-42DD-B713-EFD9B910F24E
Figs 1 View Fig , 7 View Fig , 34–35 View Fig View Fig
Diagnosis
Males of A. aurensis sp. nov. can be distinguished from all species for which males are known except A. briggsi sp. nov., A. eddieorum sp. nov., A. hughenden sp. nov., A. longitheca , A. mulgana sp. nov., A. rupicola sp. nov., and A. warrego sp. nov. by a moderate to large body size (carapace length> 4.0 mm), the presence of a long embolus (embolus length / bulb length>1.5) that has a relatively wide basal section tapering into an attenuate, sinuous distal section after about 0.4 of length, and the absence of a prominent sharp heel on metatarsus I (as in the pallida -complex) ( Fig. 34L–M View Fig ). Males of A. aurensis can be distinguished from those of A. eddieorum , A. longitheca , and A. warrego by the presence of a tibia I that widens from the proximal end to the base of the tibial spur when in lateral view ( Fig. 34P View Fig ; cf. Figs 39 View Fig , 42 View Fig , 48 View Fig ). Males of A. aurensis can be distinguished from those of A. briggsi , A. hughenden , and A. mulgana by the presence of a shorter embolus (embolus length /bulb length <2.5) ( Fig. 34L–M View Fig ; cf. Figs 36 View Fig , 41 View Fig , 44 View Fig ). Males of A. aurensis can be distinguished from those of A. rupicola by the presence of a longer distal pad and shorter proximal excavation on metatarsus I (excavation length / metatarsus length ~0.37; cf. ~ 0.46 in A. rupicola ) ( Fig. 34Q View Fig ; cf. Fig. 46 View Fig ).
Females of A. aurensis sp. nov. can be distinguished from all species for which females are known except A. briggsi sp. nov., A. camara , A. dingo sp. nov., A. eddieorum sp. nov., A. longitheca , A. mulgana sp. nov., and A. rupicola sp. nov. by the presence of spermathecae with two vesicles, with relatively long and straight lateral vesicles (lateral vesicle length / genitalia width>0.25) and long medial vesicles (medial vesicle length / lateral vesicle length>1) that project medially or posteromedially, before undulating anteriorly ( Fig. 35L View Fig ). Females of A. aurensis can be distinguished from those of A. eddieorum and A. mulgana by the presence of spermathecae with lateral vesicles terminating in narrower ends ( Fig. 35L View Fig ; cf. Figs 40 View Fig , 45 View Fig ). Females of A. aurensis can be distinguished from those of A. camara by the presence of a darker body colouration and spermathecae with longer vesicles (lateral vesicle length/ genitalia width> 0.35) with less widely-spaced crowns (distance between crowns less than length of lateral vesicles) ( Fig. 35A–L View Fig ; cf. Fig. 107 View Fig ). Females of A. aurensis can be distinguished from those of A. briggsi by the presence of spermathecae with less elongate lateral and medial vesicles (medial vesicle length/ genitalia width <0.65) ( Fig. 35L View Fig ; cf. Fig. 37 View Fig ). Females of A. aurensis can be distinguished from those of A. rupicola by the presence of spermathecae with straighter lateral vesicles ( Fig. 35L View Fig ; cf. Fig. 47 View Fig ). Females of A. aurensis can be distinguished from those of A. longitheca by the presence of spermathecae with shorter medial vesicles (medial vesicle length/ genitalia width usually <0.6), and the absence of dark patches of cuticle on the sternum, surrounding and lateral of the sigilla ( Fig. 35G–I, L View Fig ; cf. Fig. 43 View Fig ). Females of A. aurensis can be distinguished from those of A. dingo by the presence of spermathecae with thicker, less undulating medial vesicles (medial vesicle length / width ~ 5.3; cf. ~ 6.2 in A. dingo ), and a dark red body colouration ( Fig. 35A–L View Fig ; cf. Fig. 38 View Fig ).
Etymology
The specific epithet ‘ aurensis ’ is an adjective formed from the Latin ‘ aureus ’, meaning ‘golden’, and the suffix ‘- ensis ’, which signifies association with a place, referencing the distribution of this species in the Charters Towers region, an area that experienced a gold rush in the 19 th century.
Type material
Holotype
AUSTRALIA – Queensland • ♂; Charters Towers ; 20°04′ S, 146°12′ E; Dec. 2003; E. Rowe leg.; QMB S61200.
GoogleMapsParatypes
AUSTRALIA – Queensland • 1 ♀; Charters Towers, Connors Gully Road ; 20°03′ S, 146°18′ E; 293 m a.s.l.; 16 May 2023; J.D. Wilson and M.G. Rix leg.; excavated; QMB S118346 View Materials • 1 ♀; Charters Towers, Connors Gully Road ; 20°03′ S, 146°18′ E; 293 m a.s.l.; 16 May 2023; J.D. Wilson and M.G. Rix leg.; excavated; QMB S118347 View Materials GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; Charters Towers ; 20°04′ S, 146°12′ E; 8 Feb. 2005; G. Simpson leg.; QMB S73408 GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; Charters Towers ; 20°04′ S, 146°12′ E; 25 Mar. 2006; D. Duncan leg.; QMB S87666 GoogleMaps .
GoogleMapsOther material examined
AUSTRALIA – Queensland • 1 ♀; Granitevale Road , Alice River , SW of Townsville; 19°21′ S, 146°36′ E; 61 m a.s.l.; 17 May 2023; J.D. Wilson and M.G. Rix leg.; excavated, open burrow on ground; QMB S118358 View Materials GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; Ayr, Mount Kelly ; 19°40′ S, 147°18′ E; 6 Dec. 1999; Jamieson leg.; hand collected, in swimming pool; QMB S60776 GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; Jesmond Road , SW of Charters Towers; 20°10′ S, 146°09′ E; 343 m a.s.l.; 16 May 2023; J.D. Wilson and M.G. Rix leg.; excavated; QMB S118349 View Materials GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (holotype, QMB S61200)
GENERAL ( Fig. 34A–Q View Fig ). Body length 20.68, in good condition, colour presumably faded due to preservation.
DORSAL PROSOMA ( Fig. 34A, E–F View Fig ). Carapace length 8.10, width 6.43, length/width 1.26, clypeus to fovea length/carapace length 0.69, caput width/carapace width 0.75, carapace dark red-brown, reflective setae present, heavy on caput, moderate on thorax, fovea procurved, fovea width/carapace length 0.14 ( Fig. 34A, F View Fig ); chelicerae dark red-brown, rastellum absent or inconspicuous, chelicerae length/carapace length 0.52 ( Fig. 34A View Fig ); eye group rectangular, width/length 2.07, eye tubercle present ( Fig. 34E View Fig ).
ABDOMEN ( Fig. 34B, D View Fig ). Abdomen length 8.31, grey, dorsal pattern absent, with consistent cover of short setae.
VENTRAL PROSOMA ( Fig. 34C, G–I View Fig ). Labium cuspules absent ( Fig. 34H View Fig ); maxillae heel distinct, cuspules present, count =about 145, extending posteriorly onto heel, extending laterally about 35% of maxillae length ( Fig. 34C, I View Fig ); coxae cuspules absent, thorn-like setae on prolateral face present ( Fig. 34C, I View Fig ); sternum length/width 1.12, some setae rubbed off, central sternum with consistent covering of short setae, row of longer setae around posterior edges ( Fig. 34G–H View Fig ); posterior sigilla semi-elongate, central sternum to posterior sigilla length/sternum length 0.23, posterior sigilla length/sternum length 0.15 ( Fig. 34G–H View Fig ); other sigilla small, round and lateral ( Fig. 34G–H View Fig ).
LEG I ( Fig. 34N–Q View Fig ). Leg I dark red-brown, lighter on distal metatarsus and tarsus, femur length 6.35, patella length 3.99, tibia length 4.66, metatarsus length 4.53, tarsus length 2.99, total length 22.51, leg I length/carapace length 2.78 ( Fig. 34N–O View Fig ); scopulae on distal metatarsus and tarsus ( Fig. 34N–O View Fig ); spine count Fe D 1, Fe PL 1, Pa PL 2, Ti PL 0, Ti RL 0, Me PL 0, Me RL 0, Ta 0 ( Fig. 34N–O View Fig ); tibia length/width [TIL/TID] 2.96, widening from proximal end to spur before narrowing again towards distal end, spur present, intermediate triangular/digitiform, knuckle present, megaspine angled at 12 degrees, length to distal face of spur/tibia length [TIS/TIL] 0.44, spur height/tibia width [TISH/TID] 0.37, megaspine length/tibia length 0.23 ( Fig. 34N–P View Fig ); metatarsus slightly sinuous, proximal excavation present, excavation concave with pronounced heel, heel broadly rounded, excavation length/metatarsus length [MIPEL/MIL] 0.37, metatarsus length/width [MIL/MID] 3.86 ( Fig. 34N–O, Q View Fig ).
PEDIPALP ( Fig. 34J–M View Fig ). Tibia length 3.33, width 1.29, length/width [PTL/PTD] 2.58, asetose depression present, depression length/palp tibia length [PDL/PTL] 0.64, retrolateral face with consistent covering of light setae, ventral face with one elongate bristle-like seta below depression, prolateral face with patch of spines on distal half, disto-medial spine absent ( Fig. 34J–K View Fig ); patella prolateral face with 2 spines ( Fig. 34J–K View Fig ); cymbium with scopulae present distally ( Fig. 34J–K View Fig ); copulatory organ total length 1.94, length/palp tibia length 0.58 ( Fig. 34L–M View Fig ); bulb length/width 0.82 ( Fig. 34L–M View Fig ); embolus tapering from bulb, attenuate, with wide base tapering about halfway along into attenuate apical section, one slight bend, at about 0.4 of length, slight bend before tip, width at base/bulb width 0.33, embolus length/ bulb length 2.10 ( Fig. 34L–M View Fig ).
Female (paratype, QMB S118347)
GENERAL ( Fig. 35A–L View Fig ). Body length 22.15, in good condition.
DORSAL PROSOMA ( Fig. 35A, E–F View Fig ). Carapace length 8.67, width 7.10, length/width 1.22, clypeus to fovea length/carapace length 0.72, caput width/carapace width 0.76, carapace red-brown, reflective setae present, light on caput, light on thorax, fovea procurved, fovea width/carapace length 0.18 ( Fig. 35A, View Fig F); chelicerae dark red-brown, rastellum absent or inconspicuous, chelicerae length/carapace length 0.46 ( Fig. 35A View Fig ); eye group rectangular, width/length 2.08, eye tubercle present ( Fig. 35E View Fig ).
ABDOMEN ( Fig. 35B, D View Fig ). Abdomen length 9.80, brown, dorsal pattern absent, with consistent cover of short setae.
VENTRAL PROSOMA ( Fig. 35C, G–I View Fig ). Labium cuspules absent ( Fig. 35H View Fig ); maxillae heel distinct, cuspules present, count =about 110, extending posteriorly onto heel, extending laterally about 50% of maxillae length ( Fig. 35C, I View Fig ); coxae cuspules absent, thorn-like setae on prolateral face present ( Fig. 35C, I View Fig ); sternum length/width 1.19, central sternum with consistent covering of moderate setae, row of longer setae around posterior edges ( Fig. 35G–H View Fig ); posterior sigilla elongate, central sternum to posterior sigilla length/sternum length 0.19, posterior sigilla length/sternum length 0.21 ( Fig. 35G–H View Fig ); other sigilla small, round and lateral ( Fig. 35G–H View Fig ).
LEG I ( Fig. 35J–K View Fig ). Leg I red-brown, darker on patella and tibia, femur length 6.75, patella length 4.13, tibia length 4.63, metatarsus length 4.07, tarsus length 2.54, total length 22.11, leg I length/carapace length 2.55; scopulae on distal metatarsus and tarsus; spine count Fe D 2, Fe PL 1, Pa PL 2, Ti PL 1, Ti RL 4, Me PL 2, Me RL 3, Ta 0; tibia length/width [TIL/TID] 3.43.
GENITALIA ( Fig. 35D, L View Fig ). Epigastric furrow unmodified ( Fig. 35D View Fig ); spermathecae with two vesicles each ( Fig. 35L View Fig ); lateral vesicle relatively straight, length 0.65, lateral vesicle length/genitalia width 0.36, length/width at base 1.41, crown un-demarcated ( Fig. 35L View Fig ); medial vesicle with distinct basal section angled medially, before undulating anteriorly, medial vesicle length/genitalia width 0.45, length/width 5.30, medial vesicle length/lateral vesicle length 1.27 ( Fig. 35L View Fig ).
Distribution and natural history
Aname aurensis sp. nov. occurs in north-eastern Queensland, near the boundaries of the Einsleigh Uplands, Desert Uplands, and Brigalow Belt North bioregions, west from around Charters Towers, east to the coast around Townsville and Ayr ( Fig. 7 View Fig ). It constructs an open, silk-lined burrow without silk outside of the entrance, often on an angle, and with a hidden secondary ‘wishbone’ entrance ( Fig. 7 View Fig ).
QMB |
Queensland Museum, Brisbane |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.