Aname fossoria, Wilson & Harvey & Simmons & Rix, 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2025.985.2845 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6F0815FE-5CA2-4254-8638-9E59E04C349B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15169689 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038B878B-FF03-21C7-FD17-FAE0C9B267D1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Aname fossoria |
status |
sp. nov. |
Aname fossoria sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:D2C300AB-2A63-426B-8047-D0FFCBE21985
Figs 1 View Fig , 12 View Fig , 83 View Fig
Diagnosis
Males of A. fossoria sp. nov. are unknown.
Females of A. fossoria sp. nov. can be distinguished from all species for which females are known except A. fuscochelicera sp. nov., A. nigrochelicera sp. nov., A. nigrotarsa sp. nov., A. rubrochelicera sp. nov., and A. savannensis sp. nov. by the presence of spermathecae with two vesicles, with very short, wide lateral vesicles (lateral vesicle length/genitalia width <0.25) and thinner medial vesicles projecting from the ventral face of the lateral vesicles ( Fig. 83A–L View Fig ). Females of A. fossoria can be distinguished from those of A. nigrochelicera , A. rubrochelicera , and A. savannensis by the presence of spermathecae with tightly undulating medial vesicles ( Fig. 83L View Fig ; cf. Figs 88 View Fig , 91 View Fig , 93 View Fig ). Females of A. fossoria can be distinguished from those of A. fuscochelicera by the presence of lighter red chelicerae ( Fig. 83A, C View Fig ; cf. Fig. 85 View Fig ). Females of A. fossoria can be distinguished from those of A. nigrotarsa by the presence of spermathecae with less elongate medial vesicles (medial vesicle length/ width <5) and anterior legs without dark tarsi and distal metatarsi ( Fig. 83J–L View Fig ; cf. Fig. 89 View Fig ).
Etymology
The specific epithet ‘ fossoria ’ is a Latin adjective meaning ‘digger’ or ‘burrower’, in reference to both the collection locality of the holotype female, at the Richmond Fossil Site, and to the fossorial nature of the spider.
Type material
Holotype
AUSTRALIA – Queensland • ♀; Richmond fossil site; 20°39′ S, 143°06′ E; 199 m a.s.l.; 9 Apr. 2021; E.J. Briggs and V. O. Garcia leg.; excavated, open burrow on ground; QMB S118213 View Materials .
GoogleMapsOther material examined
AUSTRALIA – Queensland • 1 ♀; Jesmond Road , SW of Charters Towers; 20°10′ S, 146°09′ E; 365 m a.s.l.; 16 May 2023; J.D. Wilson and M.G. Rix leg.; open burrow with little silk and no wishbone; QMB S118351 View Materials GoogleMaps .
Description
Female (holotype, QMB S118213)
GENERAL ( Fig. 83A–L View Fig ). Body length 21.86, in good condition.
DORSAL PROSOMA ( Fig. 83A, E–F View Fig ). Carapace length 8.43, width 7.19, length/width 1.17, clypeus to fovea length/carapace length 0.71, caput width/carapace width 0.75, carapace pallid-orange, reflective setae absent or inconspicuous, fovea procurved, fovea width/carapace length 0.15 ( Fig. 83A, F View Fig ); chelicerae orange, rastellum absent or inconspicuous, chelicerae length/carapace length 0.45 ( Fig. 83A View Fig ); eye group rectangular, width/length 1.92, eye tubercle present ( Fig. 83E View Fig ).
ABDOMEN ( Fig. 83B, D View Fig ). Abdomen length 9.60, tan-brown, darker dorsally and lighter laterally, dorsal pattern absent, with consistent cover of short setae.
VENTRAL PROSOMA ( Fig. 83C, G–I View Fig ). Labium cuspules absent ( Fig. 83H View Fig ); maxillae heel distinct, cuspules present, count =about 80, extending posteriorly onto heel, extending laterally about 30% of maxillae length ( Fig. 83C, I View Fig ); coxae cuspules absent, thorn-like setae on prolateral face present ( Fig. 83C, I View Fig ); sternum length/width 1.26, central sternum with consistent covering of short setae, row of longer setae around posterior edges, setae at higher density around anterior edges ( Fig. 83G–H View Fig ); posterior sigilla elongate, central sternum to posterior sigilla length/sternum length 0.26, posterior sigilla length/sternum length 0.15 ( Fig. 83G–H View Fig ); other sigilla small, round and lateral ( Fig. 83G–H View Fig ).
LEG I ( Fig. 83J–K View Fig ). Leg I pallid, reflective setae on dorsal femur, femur length 6.40, patella length 4.11, tibia length 4.64, metatarsus length 4.55, tarsus length 2.53, total length 22.23, leg I length/carapace length 2.64; scopulae on distal metatarsus and tarsus; spine count Fe D 3, Fe PL 1, Pa PL 4 (proximal sweak, medial rubbed off), Ti PL 5, Ti RL 5, Me PL 4, Me RL 5, Ta 0; tibia length/width [TIL/TID] 3.22.
GENITALIA ( Fig. 83D, L View Fig ). Epigastric furrow unmodified ( Fig. 83D View Fig ); spermathecae with two vesicles each ( Fig. 83L View Fig ); lateral vesicle very wide, short and roughly triangular, length 0.21, lateral vesicle length/ genitalia width 0.12, length/width at base 0.34, crown distinct and narrow ( Fig. 83L View Fig ); medial vesicle short, undulating, and projecting postero-ventrally, medial vesicle length/genitalia width 0.25, length/ width 4.93, medial vesicle length/lateral vesicle length 2.14 ( Fig. 83L View Fig ).
Distribution and natural history
Aname fossoria sp. nov. occurs in central-northern Queensland, near the border of the Mitchell Grass Downs and Gulf Plains bioregions, and further east in the Desert Uplands bioregion. It is known from two locations: the type location near the Richmond Fossil Site, and much further east, just west of Charters Towers, where a female has been tentatively linked to this species ( Fig. 12 View Fig ). The form of burrows constructed by spiders of this species is unknown, but is likely to be similar to that of other rubrochelicera -complex species ( Fig. 12 View Fig ).
QMB |
Queensland Museum, Brisbane |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.