Dna
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.26028/cybium/2024-014 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038B832D-FF80-9060-FF16-CB34AE8AADE2 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Dna |
status |
|
DNA barcode sequencing
Each specimen caught was sequenced. Total DNA was extracted using Macherey and Nagel NucleoSpin® Tissue kits following the manufacturer’s instructions on an Eppendorf EpMotion 5075®.
As the aim of our project was to give access to the partial 12 S ribosomal RNA sequence (i.e, the marker most often used for e DNA studies) and the partial COI gene commonly used for barcoding, a part of the mitochondrial genome (called in this study ‘Mt-1’ for ‘the first part of the mitogenome’ starting from the middle of the 12 S to the tRNA-Ser after the COI gene) was amplified following the protocol established by Hinsinger et al. (2015) using the specific primers 12S-L1091R 5’ AAACTGGGATTAGA- TACCCCACTAT 3’ ( Kocher et al., 1989) and MtH7061 5’ GGGTTATGTGGCTGGCTTGAAAC 3’( Hinsinger et al., 2015). The Mt-1 fragment provides the sequence of 12 S gene [around 500 bp] and the complete COI gene. Ampli-
con libraries ( Hinsinger et al., 2015) were then sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq sequencer following the manufacturer’s instructions.
When the Mt-1 fragment reconstruction was difficult, a fragment of the COI gene was amplified with the specific fish primers TelF1 and TelR1 ( Dettaï et al., 2011) and used as a reference.
Data processing was done in Geneious v.11.1.2 (http:// www.geneious.com, Kearse et al., 2012). To reconstruct the Mt-1 fragment of each individual, we used the mtDNA of the species identified morphologically or of the same genus (personal data or sequences available on GenBank) as a starting reference (i.e., for a Map to reference). For the species that had not been sequenced yet at the time of our project, such as, for example, Bleheratherina pierucciae Aarn and Ivantsoff, 2009 , a piece of the COI gene was obtained by Sanger sequencing and then used as a starting reference. The consensus of each Mt-1 fragment was primarily checked manually (assembly success, coverage assessment, comparison to available COI sequences for the same specimen, BLAST searches; Altschul et al., 1997). Then the consensus sequence was annotated using MitoAnnotator ( Iwasaki et al., 2013) and each gene was checked for coding sequences, stop codons, position of the SNPs.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.