Rhytomus latidentatus Saxton & Génier, 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5575.1.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:521D404D-EB9D-4110-989E-A8A273C10152 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14808919 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038987E8-FFF8-6E0B-FF46-16DCFD52FBA0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhytomus latidentatus Saxton & Génier |
status |
sp. nov. |
Rhytomus latidentatus Saxton & Génier , new species
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:8C418C61-9081-48AD-B9BB-6CBC74D23206
Figs. 4C, 4E View FIGURE 4 , 7E View FIGURE 7 , 8E View FIGURE 8 , 10A View FIGURE 10 , 12A View FIGURE 12
Name-bearing type data. Holotype ♂ ( CMNC). || PAPUA NEW GUINEA: Western | Prov., P’nvang , CI RAP Survey | Camp 1. 05º29.5S 141º32.6E | 573 m. May 2013. T. Larsen ||; || Canadian Museum of | Musée canadien de la | NATURE | CMNEN 00049540 || [QR code label]; || HOLOTYPE ♂ | Rhytomus | latidentatus | Des. N. Saxton & F. Génier, 2024 || [red card] GoogleMaps .
Material examined (22 ♂♂, 12 ♀♀). PAPUA NEW GUINEA: CENTRAL PROVINCE, Kokoda Trak, Kauai River , Menari , 700 m, [09°11’30’’S, 147°37’30’’E], 12–14.viii.1976, rainforest, dung, O. Kukal — 3 ♂♂, 1 ♀ paratypes ( CMNC), GoogleMaps 2 ♂♂ paratypes ( MNHN); GoogleMaps WESTERN PROVINCE, CI RAP Survey Camp 1 , P’nvang , 575 m, 05°29’S, 141°32’E, v.2013, T. Larsen — 1 ♂, 1 ♀ paratypes ( ANIC), GoogleMaps ♂ holotype, ♀ allotype GoogleMaps , 14 ♂♂, 8 ♀♀ paratypes ( CMNC), 1 ♂, 1 ♀ paratypes ( QM) .
Description. Measurements. Body length 4.5–6.3 mm, maximum body width 3.1–4.2 mm. Holotype: length 5.5 mm, maximum body width 3.9 mm. Body. Overall body shape in dorsal view oval, elytral edge evenly rounded from base to apex. Head. Clypeal edge lateral to clypeal teeth lacking emargination, clypeal teeth wide, head margin at clypeogenal suture of females slightly protruding. Dorsal parts of eyes semi-ovoid, separated by an interocular space of about 5.1 times eye width. Pronotum. Pronotal width to length along midline ratio 1.6, lateral pronotal edge sharply defined throughout, pronotal pubescence short and fine, pronotal basal portion along midline with fine longitudinal depression. Elytra. Elytral maximum width to length along suture ratio 1.0, elytral outline moderately convex in lateral view, elytral pubescence long and conspicuous, elytral surface between punctures with distinct microsculptures ( Fig. 12A View FIGURE 12 ), basal elytral pit absent, basal surface of pseudepipleuron with irregularly distributed more or less defined punctures, interstriae 3–5 on basal fifth with two rows of punctures along striae with the odd unaligned punctures on interstriae 3 and 5 and scattered unaligned punctures on interstria 4. Legs. Profemoral anterior surface flat, male metatibial apicointernal teeth approximately in line with posterior tibial edge. Pygidium. Pygidial groove transverse, narrowed medially, and terminating in a pit at each end ( Fig. 8E View FIGURE 8 ), surface along midline with punctures similar in density to rest of discs, pygidial surface along basal groove smooth between punctures, pygidium of female evenly convex. Aedeagus. Left paramere apex rounded in a dorsoventral plane ( Fig. 10A View FIGURE 10 ). Female genitalia. Spermatheca with two apodemes basally and one apodeme apically.
Etymology. The specific epithet of this species is a combination of the Latin adjective “ latus ” meaning wide and the adjective “ dentatus ” meaning dentate in reference to this species’ characteristically wide clypeal teeth.
Remarks. Paulian (1985) studied four specimens of this species which he identified as “ Tesserodon heurni ” in his work on the Canthonines of New Guinea.
MNHN |
France, Paris, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
ANIC |
Australia, Australian Capital Territory, Canberra City, CSIRO, Australian National Insect Collection |
QM |
Australia, Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland Museum |
MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
ANIC |
Australian National Insect Collection |
QM |
Queensland Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Scarabaeinae |
Genus |