Spelocteniza Gertsch, 1982

Dupérré, Nadine & Tapia, Elicio, 2025, Revision of the Ecuadorian Microstigmatidae (Araneae: Mygalomorphae), with the description of six new species, European Journal of Taxonomy 1007, pp. 87-132 : 94-95

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2025.1007.2999

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3D9557C2-29EA-46CD-8E4C-40D22DDE4CAF

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16895662

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038487E4-FFCF-FF91-FDC4-F90EFEEA7F62

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Spelocteniza Gertsch, 1982
status

 

Genus Spelocteniza Gertsch, 1982 View in CoL

Type species

Spelocteniza ashmolei Gertsch, 1982 View in CoL by monotypy.

Composition

Spelocteniza ashmolei Gertsch, 1982 View in CoL , S. pampenita sp. nov. and S. zuninoi sp. nov.

Diagnosis

Spelocteniza is distinguished from Envia and Pseudonemesia by the absence of a scutum in the male ( Fig. 6A View Fig ); the absence of a large subapical clasping spine in males ( Figs 7D View Fig , 11C View Fig ) and leg cuticule pustulose ( Figs 25D View Fig , 28C View Fig ), while a scutum is present in males ( Fig. 2C View Fig ; see Ott & Höffer 2004: fig. 2); large subapical clasping spine present in males ( Fig. 2D View Fig , see Ott & Höffer 2004: figs 4–5) and scaly cuticule (Miglio & Bonaldo 2011: fig.17; Indicatti &Villareal 2016: fig. 3d). From Ministigmata , Spelocteniza is distinguished by the presence of four spinnerets ( Fig. 27B View Fig ), two in the former ( Raven & Platnick 1981); from Tonton by the leg cuticule being pustulose, not pustulose in the latter ( Passanha et al. 2019: fig. 2f), and the tarsal organ strongly elevated ( Figs 25A View Fig , 28F View Fig ) low with concentric ridges in the latter ( Passanha et al. 2019: fig. 1e). From Pastaza gen. nov. males are distinguished by their palp bulb with paraembolic apophysis ( Figs 8D View Fig , 12D View Fig ), absent in the latter ( Figs 17D View Fig , 23D View Fig ); females are distinguished by their narrow spermathecal bases ( Figs 5C View Fig , 10C View Fig ) whereas they are wide in the latter ( Figs 14E View Fig , 20E View Fig ).

Distribution

Ecuador.

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF