Pseudonemesia Caporiacco, 1955
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2025.1007.2999 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3D9557C2-29EA-46CD-8E4C-40D22DDE4CAF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16895654 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038487E4-FFCB-FF9D-FDA3-F9C1FD967E65 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pseudonemesia Caporiacco, 1955 |
status |
|
Genus Pseudonemesia Caporiacco, 1955 View in CoL
Type species
Pseudonemesia parva Caporiacco, 1955 View in CoL by monotypy.
Composition
Pseudonemesia kochalkai Raven & Platnick, 1981 View in CoL , P. parva Caporiacco, 1955 View in CoL , P. tabiskey Indicatti & Villareal, 2016 View in CoL and P. scutata sp. nov.
Diagnosis
For a complete diagnosis see Indicatti & Villarreal (2016). Pseudonemesia is differentiated from Spelocteniza and Pastaza gen. nov. by their tarsal organ being semi-flat, about two fifths away from apex with concentric ridges (see Raven & Platnick 1981: figs 31–32; Indicatti & Villarreal 2016: fig. 5a, d) while in Spelocteniza and Pastaza gen. nov. the tarsal organ is highly elevated, situated at the apex of tarsus ( Figs 25A View Fig , 29E View Fig ); presence of clavate setae on abdomen ( Indicatti & Villarreal 2016: figs 6b, 9b) absent in the other two genera. Furthermore, males of Pseudonemesia differ from those of Spelocteniza and Pastaza gen. nov. by the presence of a dorsal abdominal scutum ( Fig. 2C View Fig , arrow), and a unique large clasping spur accompanied by short and apically rounded spine ( Fig. 2D View Fig , arrow); both characters are absent in the males of the latter genera ( Figs 6A View Fig , 7D View Fig , 15A View Fig , 16C View Fig ).
Distribution
Venezuela, Colombia and Ecuador.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.