Pseudonemesia Caporiacco, 1955

Dupérré, Nadine & Tapia, Elicio, 2025, Revision of the Ecuadorian Microstigmatidae (Araneae: Mygalomorphae), with the description of six new species, European Journal of Taxonomy 1007, pp. 87-132 : 90-91

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2025.1007.2999

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3D9557C2-29EA-46CD-8E4C-40D22DDE4CAF

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16895654

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038487E4-FFCB-FF9D-FDA3-F9C1FD967E65

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Pseudonemesia Caporiacco, 1955
status

 

Genus Pseudonemesia Caporiacco, 1955 View in CoL

Type species

Pseudonemesia parva Caporiacco, 1955 View in CoL by monotypy.

Composition

Pseudonemesia kochalkai Raven & Platnick, 1981 View in CoL , P. parva Caporiacco, 1955 View in CoL , P. tabiskey Indicatti & Villareal, 2016 View in CoL and P. scutata sp. nov.

Diagnosis

For a complete diagnosis see Indicatti & Villarreal (2016). Pseudonemesia is differentiated from Spelocteniza and Pastaza gen. nov. by their tarsal organ being semi-flat, about two fifths away from apex with concentric ridges (see Raven & Platnick 1981: figs 31–32; Indicatti & Villarreal 2016: fig. 5a, d) while in Spelocteniza and Pastaza gen. nov. the tarsal organ is highly elevated, situated at the apex of tarsus ( Figs 25A View Fig , 29E View Fig ); presence of clavate setae on abdomen ( Indicatti & Villarreal 2016: figs 6b, 9b) absent in the other two genera. Furthermore, males of Pseudonemesia differ from those of Spelocteniza and Pastaza gen. nov. by the presence of a dorsal abdominal scutum ( Fig. 2C View Fig , arrow), and a unique large clasping spur accompanied by short and apically rounded spine ( Fig. 2D View Fig , arrow); both characters are absent in the males of the latter genera ( Figs 6A View Fig , 7D View Fig , 15A View Fig , 16C View Fig ).

Distribution

Venezuela, Colombia and Ecuador.

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF