Zenodosus sanguineus (Say, 1835)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5639.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E6DA42BA-927B-455A-B4E3-5F487E00D737 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/020087EF-773B-4B1F-F4D2-F9E052E4FC52 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Zenodosus sanguineus (Say, 1835) |
status |
|
Zenodosus sanguineus (Say, 1835) ; Thanerocleridae : Zenodosinae (no tribal assignment)
Illustrations: Plate 5-L. Key to thaneroclerid genera, couplet 1-A, B
Distribution: NC to NB to MN to CO to AR.
- Recorded from: AR, CO, DC, IA, IL, IN, KY, MA, ME, MI, MN, NC, NH, NY, OH, PA, VA, VT, WI, WV, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Prince Edward Island and Quebec ( Wolcott 1947; Knull 1951; Papp 1960; Majka 2006; Dorshorst & Young 2008; Gandhi et al. 2009; Steury & Leavengood 2018; Steury 2021; BugGuide).
- New State Record: KENTUCKY: Madison County: Berea , burned forest, Lindgren funnel trap, 18-V-21, Kane Lawhorn ( UKIC, 1); Whitley County: WSW of Liza Mountain, on bark of Liriodendron tulipifera ca. 12:50 PM , 21-VI-1995, Charles Wright ( CEWC, 1). VERMONT: Grand Isle County: 1.6 km W of Pearl, 44.689472N, 73.34733W, 38 m., Wood processing, Panel intercept trap with Trichoferus campestris lure + EtOH, 24-V-7-VI-2024, PH Team ( JMLC, 2); Windham County : 0.9 km ESE of Brockways Mills, 43.202725N, 72.506396W, 154 m., wood processing, Lindgren funnel trap with 3- Ips , 28-V-13-VI-2024, PH Team ( JMLC, 1) GoogleMaps .
Kentucky counties (Map 34): Letcher (1), Madison (1), Whitley (1). Kentucky specimens were collected from the southeastern quarter of the state.
Years: 1995 (1), 2014 (1), 2021 (1)
Months: March (1), May (1), June (1)
Collections (3): BugGuide (1), CEWC (1), UKIC (1)
Collection methods: Lindgren funnel trap (1)
Natural History: Chittenden (1890) reported that it has been collected from dead oak ( Quercus ), dead maple ( Acer ) in New York and milled birch ( Betula ) in Maine; infestations not noted. Bøving & Champlain (1920) reported that adults were collected from spruce ( Picea ) infested with the spruce bark beetle ( Dendroctonus piceaperda Hopkins ) in Maine and with the scolytine Polygraphus in West Virginia. They also reported collections from a decaying wound in a living beech ( Fagus ) in WV and under bark of dead white pine ( Pinus strobus ) in New Hampshire. Knull (1951) reported that adults are diurnal and occur under bark or at the bases of dead trees with wood boring insect infestations in Ohio. Gosling (1980) reported collecting it from oak ( Quercus ) logs in Michigan. Mawdsley (1999) reported observing adults on recently dead or dying trunks or recently felled logs of eastern white pine and that adults overwinter at the bases of dead trees beneath the bark in frass. Mawdsley (1999) reported collecting it from beneath the bark of large, dead beech ( Fagus ), black cherry ( Prunus serotina ), eastern hemlock ( Tsuga canadensis ) and eastern white pine ( Pinus strobus ). Ryall and Fahrig (2005) reported collecting adults from red pine ( Pinus resinosa ) infested with the pine engraver ( Ips pini (Say)) . Majka (2006) added that in Nova Scotia, it is associated with scolytine galleries in red spruce ( Picea rubens ) and eastern hemlock ( Tsuga canadensis ). Dorshorst & Young (2008) reported collections from white oak ( Quercus alba ) and dead northern pin oak ( Q. ellipsoidalis ) and northern red oak ( Q. rubra ) and associations with oak sap flows and shelf fungi on dead yellow birch ( Betula alleghaniensis ) in Wisconsin. They also reported observing it “feeding on leiodids and sphindids within the fruiting structures of myxomycetes under the bark of standing, dead hardwood and Pinus resinosa Aiton trees” and that Lindgren funnel traps were the most frequent collecting method. While working in the eastern part of the northern boreal forest in Canada, Bouchard and Hebert (2016) only found this species in patches of forest larger than 50 ha.
Notes on species erroneously reported from eastern North America
PM |
Pratt Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |