Pristolepis, Jerdon, 1849

Prakash, Anjana Preetha, Raghavan, Rajeev, Dahanukar, Neelesh, Anoop, V. K., Thampy, Dencin Rons, Britz, Ralf & Ali, Anvar, 2025, Pristolepis pentacantha Plamoottil 2015, and Catopra tetracanthus Günther 1862: two junior synonyms of Pristolepis marginata Jerdon 1849, Zootaxa 5642 (3), pp. 245-259 : 247

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5642.3.3

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0F7A36EB-CB9C-4397-9F31-90B1FCCC4546

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15584494

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/013B87E3-0537-2B09-D8C6-5163ECA5F809

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Pristolepis
status

 

Genetic divergence within Pristolepis View in CoL specimens in the Kabini River

Mitochondrial COI sequence divergence between 11 specimens (alignment length: 597 bp) collected from various localities in the Kabini, including the type locality of Pristolepis marginata (Mananthavady) and P. pentacantha (Bavali) were in the ranges of 0–0.5% (uncorrected p-distance). This included specimens matching the description of both P. marginata (D XV 12; P 15; V I 5; A IV 8; Jerdon 1849) and P. pentacantha (D XV–XVI 11; P 14; V I 5; A V 7; Plamoottil (A)), and showing the key diagnostic character of four or five anal-fin spines. Additionally, haplotype network analysis revealed the presence of two haplotypes ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ) – one of the haplotypes observed in a single individual of the five-spined Pristolepis (which we identified as P. pentacantha ), and the second haplotype in the remaining 10 individuals (two individuals of five-spined, and eight individuals of four-spined Pristolepis ). Three mutational steps separated these two haplotypes which translates into a genetic distance (uncorrected p-distance) of 0.5% ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ).

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF