Agama cf. schacki Mertens, 1938
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.3897/vz.75.e169790 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:22DBAEFB-4690-47FD-9259-98013D7BF8CB |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17418360 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/002261A2-1EB3-54E8-8F84-3D2FD0C82D37 |
|
treatment provided by |
|
|
scientific name |
Agama cf. schacki Mertens, 1938 |
| status |
|
Agama cf. schacki Mertens, 1938 View in CoL
Specimens.
Angola: Duque de Bragança : BMNH 1866.6.11.2 , Caconda : BMNH 1893.12.27.3 , Quindumbo : BMNH 1893.12.27.4 .
Comments.
Two adult males ( BMNH 1866.6.11.2 , BMNH 1893.12.27.4 ) and one female ( BMNH 1866.6.11.2 ) were sent from the Lisbon Museum. The specimen from Duque de Bragança was sent in 1866 as “ Agama sp. ? ” ( NHMA /DF/GüntherColl/16/1/110 ) and was noted by Günther as “ closely allied to Agama occipitalis , but has somewhat smaller scales ” ( AHMB /CE/G79 ), leading Bocage (1866 a) to conservatively refer additional material collected by Bayão to “ Agama occipitalis Gray. var.? ”. This specimen was later cited by Boulenger (1885 a) as Agama planiceps . Butler (2020) validated the specific status of Agama schacki and identified cryptic diversity associated with this taxon. While the specimen from Quindumbo likely represents typical Agama schacki , those from Caconda and Duque de Bragança belong to two additional distinct lineages ( Butler 2020).
| NHMA |
Natural History Museum, Aarhus Denmark |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
