taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03C29D2CFF93173BFF02FF51FC4FFB86.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/196593/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.196593	FIGURE 7. Gordius balcanicus and G. digitatus. A – C. Gordius balcanicus sp. nov., D – E. G. digitatus sp. nov. A, E. Posterior ends. B. Cuticle under low magnification. C. Cuticle showing broad ridges separated by grooves. D. Cuticle showing irregular shape of areoles.	FIGURE 7. Gordius balcanicus and G. digitatus. A – C. Gordius balcanicus sp. nov., D – E. G. digitatus sp. nov. A, E. Posterior ends. B. Cuticle under low magnification. C. Cuticle showing broad ridges separated by grooves. D. Cuticle showing irregular shape of areoles.	2010-12-31	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas		Zenodo	biologists	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas			
03C29D2CFF93173BFF02FB6CFF49F800.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/196593/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.196593	FIGURE 7. Gordius balcanicus and G. digitatus. A – C. Gordius balcanicus sp. nov., D – E. G. digitatus sp. nov. A, E. Posterior ends. B. Cuticle under low magnification. C. Cuticle showing broad ridges separated by grooves. D. Cuticle showing irregular shape of areoles.	FIGURE 7. Gordius balcanicus and G. digitatus. A – C. Gordius balcanicus sp. nov., D – E. G. digitatus sp. nov. A, E. Posterior ends. B. Cuticle under low magnification. C. Cuticle showing broad ridges separated by grooves. D. Cuticle showing irregular shape of areoles.	2010-12-31	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas		Zenodo	biologists	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas			
03C29D2CFF93173BFF02FB6CFF49F800.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/196588/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.196588	FIGURE 2. Cuticular characters under lower magnifications in Gordius. A. Polygonal areoles on the cuticle of Gordius cf. tatrensis (collection Schmidt-Rhaesa # 623.2). B. Smooth cuticle in G. aquaticus (SR 901). C. Bristles on smooth cuticle in an undetermined Gordius specimen from Montenegro (SR 969). D. Contamination plaques of unknown nature on the cuticle of G. digitatus (ZMH V 13271). E. Star-like crystals on the cuticle of G. aquaticus (SR 839). F. Blossomlike crystals on the cuticle of G. aquaticus from Germany (SR 839). G. Uneven cuticular surface of a G. aquaticus specimen (SR 839). H. Smooth cuticle in an undetermined Gordius specimen from Estonia (SR 1006).	FIGURE 2. Cuticular characters under lower magnifications in Gordius. A. Polygonal areoles on the cuticle of Gordius cf. tatrensis (collection Schmidt-Rhaesa # 623.2). B. Smooth cuticle in G. aquaticus (SR 901). C. Bristles on smooth cuticle in an undetermined Gordius specimen from Montenegro (SR 969). D. Contamination plaques of unknown nature on the cuticle of G. digitatus (ZMH V 13271). E. Star-like crystals on the cuticle of G. aquaticus (SR 839). F. Blossomlike crystals on the cuticle of G. aquaticus from Germany (SR 839). G. Uneven cuticular surface of a G. aquaticus specimen (SR 839). H. Smooth cuticle in an undetermined Gordius specimen from Estonia (SR 1006).	2010-12-31	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas		Zenodo	biologists	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas			
03C29D2CFF911739FF02FF51FAC1FB6E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/196594/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.196594	FIGURE 8. Gordius helveticus sp. nov. A. Posterior end of holotype, arrows indicate characteristic accumulation of bristles posterior of the postcloacal crescent. B. Magnification of bristles marked by arrow in A. C. Body cuticle of paratype showing scattered bristles. D. Posterior end of paratype.	FIGURE 8. Gordius helveticus sp. nov. A. Posterior end of holotype, arrows indicate characteristic accumulation of bristles posterior of the postcloacal crescent. B. Magnification of bristles marked by arrow in A. C. Body cuticle of paratype showing scattered bristles. D. Posterior end of paratype.	2010-12-31	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas		Zenodo	biologists	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas			
03C29D2CFF911739FF02FF51FAC1FB6E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/196597/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.196597	FIGURE 11. Schematic drawing indicating the differences in the distribution of bristles and spines in the posterior end of A. G. helveticus, B. G. karwendeli and C. G. zwicki.	FIGURE 11. Schematic drawing indicating the differences in the distribution of bristles and spines in the posterior end of A. G. helveticus, B. G. karwendeli and C. G. zwicki.	2010-12-31	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas		Zenodo	biologists	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas			
03C29D2CFF911736FF02FACCFC06FEF0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/196595/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.196595	FIGURE 9. A – C. Gordius karwendeli sp. nov., D – E. G. p e s i c i sp. nov. A. Posterior end. B. Magnification from the posterior end showing smooth region on the inner side of the tail lobes and characteristic arrangement of bristles. C. Polygonal regionalization of the cuticular surface. D. Posterior end. E. Structure of the cuticle.	FIGURE 9. A – C. Gordius karwendeli sp. nov., D – E. G. p e s i c i sp. nov. A. Posterior end. B. Magnification from the posterior end showing smooth region on the inner side of the tail lobes and characteristic arrangement of bristles. C. Polygonal regionalization of the cuticular surface. D. Posterior end. E. Structure of the cuticle.	2010-12-31	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas		Zenodo	biologists	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas			
03C29D2CFF911736FF02FACCFC06FEF0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/196597/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.196597	FIGURE 11. Schematic drawing indicating the differences in the distribution of bristles and spines in the posterior end of A. G. helveticus, B. G. karwendeli and C. G. zwicki.	FIGURE 11. Schematic drawing indicating the differences in the distribution of bristles and spines in the posterior end of A. G. helveticus, B. G. karwendeli and C. G. zwicki.	2010-12-31	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas		Zenodo	biologists	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas			
03C29D2CFF9F1737FF02FF51FE53FBD8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/196595/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.196595	FIGURE 9. A – C. Gordius karwendeli sp. nov., D – E. G. p e s i c i sp. nov. A. Posterior end. B. Magnification from the posterior end showing smooth region on the inner side of the tail lobes and characteristic arrangement of bristles. C. Polygonal regionalization of the cuticular surface. D. Posterior end. E. Structure of the cuticle.	FIGURE 9. A – C. Gordius karwendeli sp. nov., D – E. G. p e s i c i sp. nov. A. Posterior end. B. Magnification from the posterior end showing smooth region on the inner side of the tail lobes and characteristic arrangement of bristles. C. Polygonal regionalization of the cuticular surface. D. Posterior end. E. Structure of the cuticle.	2010-12-31	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas		Zenodo	biologists	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas			
03C29D2CFF9F1734FF02FB99FE53FF05.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/196596/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.196596	FIGURE 10. A, B. Gordius serratus sp. nov., C – F. G. z w i c k i sp. nov. A. Posterior end of holotype. B. Posterior end of paratype. C. Posterior end of paratype. D. Posterior end of holotype. E, F. Characteristic distribution of spines (arrow) posterior to the postcloacal crescent.	FIGURE 10. A, B. Gordius serratus sp. nov., C – F. G. z w i c k i sp. nov. A. Posterior end of holotype. B. Posterior end of paratype. C. Posterior end of paratype. D. Posterior end of holotype. E, F. Characteristic distribution of spines (arrow) posterior to the postcloacal crescent.	2010-12-31	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas		Zenodo	biologists	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas			
03C29D2CFF9D1732FF02F8A4FED0FBE0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/196596/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.196596	FIGURE 10. A, B. Gordius serratus sp. nov., C – F. G. z w i c k i sp. nov. A. Posterior end of holotype. B. Posterior end of paratype. C. Posterior end of paratype. D. Posterior end of holotype. E, F. Characteristic distribution of spines (arrow) posterior to the postcloacal crescent.	FIGURE 10. A, B. Gordius serratus sp. nov., C – F. G. z w i c k i sp. nov. A. Posterior end of holotype. B. Posterior end of paratype. C. Posterior end of paratype. D. Posterior end of holotype. E, F. Characteristic distribution of spines (arrow) posterior to the postcloacal crescent.	2010-12-31	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas		Zenodo	biologists	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas			
03C29D2CFF9D1732FF02F8A4FED0FBE0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/196590/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.196590	FIGURE 4. Cuticular structures and artifacts. A. Scars on the surface of G. aquaticus from Germany (SR 952). B. The mixture of smooth and otherwise structured surface may be due to erostion (undetermined Gordius specimen from Italy; SR 1367). C. Cuticular surface structure in an undetermined Gordius specimen from Germany; SR 1031). D. Smooth and rough structure of the cuticle in G. z w i c k i sp. nov. (holotype ZMH V 13275). E. Cross section of the cuticle (cut) with layers of fibres. Below cuticle are epidermis (epi), longitudinal musculature (mus) and parenchyme (par) (G. helveticus sp. nov., paratype ZMH V 13277). F. “ Rhomboidal pattern ” on the cuticle created by the underlying arrangement of cuticular fibres (G. aquaticus from Germany, SR 995).	FIGURE 4. Cuticular structures and artifacts. A. Scars on the surface of G. aquaticus from Germany (SR 952). B. The mixture of smooth and otherwise structured surface may be due to erostion (undetermined Gordius specimen from Italy; SR 1367). C. Cuticular surface structure in an undetermined Gordius specimen from Germany; SR 1031). D. Smooth and rough structure of the cuticle in G. z w i c k i sp. nov. (holotype ZMH V 13275). E. Cross section of the cuticle (cut) with layers of fibres. Below cuticle are epidermis (epi), longitudinal musculature (mus) and parenchyme (par) (G. helveticus sp. nov., paratype ZMH V 13277). F. “ Rhomboidal pattern ” on the cuticle created by the underlying arrangement of cuticular fibres (G. aquaticus from Germany, SR 995).	2010-12-31	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas		Zenodo	biologists	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas			
03C29D2CFF9A1733FF02F914FF64FA4C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/196597/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.196597	FIGURE 11. Schematic drawing indicating the differences in the distribution of bristles and spines in the posterior end of A. G. helveticus, B. G. karwendeli and C. G. zwicki.	FIGURE 11. Schematic drawing indicating the differences in the distribution of bristles and spines in the posterior end of A. G. helveticus, B. G. karwendeli and C. G. zwicki.	2010-12-31	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas		Zenodo	biologists	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas			
03C29D2CFF9B1730FF02FA32FC1AFF2E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/196597/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.196597	FIGURE 11. Schematic drawing indicating the differences in the distribution of bristles and spines in the posterior end of A. G. helveticus, B. G. karwendeli and C. G. zwicki.	FIGURE 11. Schematic drawing indicating the differences in the distribution of bristles and spines in the posterior end of A. G. helveticus, B. G. karwendeli and C. G. zwicki.	2010-12-31	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas		Zenodo	biologists	Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas			
