taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03C088714E1DFFE6FDFDFEC0FB23A28D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4122309/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4122309	Fig. 1. Hercostomus brandbergensis sp. nov., ♂, paratype (NMNW). A. Habitus. B. Antenna. C. Mid femora, anterior view. D. Hypopygium, right lateral view. E. Distoventral appendages of epandrium. F. Cercus, surstylus and distal lobe of postgonite.	Fig. 1. Hercostomus brandbergensis sp. nov., ♂, paratype (NMNW). A. Habitus. B. Antenna. C. Mid femora, anterior view. D. Hypopygium, right lateral view. E. Distoventral appendages of epandrium. F. Cercus, surstylus and distal lobe of postgonite.	2020-10-22	Grichanov, Igor Ya.		Zenodo	biologists	Grichanov, Igor Ya.			
03C088714E1BFFE4FD98FA3EFB27A411.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4122311/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4122311	Fig. 2. Hercostomus fedotovae sp. nov., ♂, holotype (ZMUM). A. Habitus. B. Antenna. C. Fore tarsus. D. Distal appendages of epandrium. E. Hypopygium, left lateral view. F. Hypopygium, right lateral view.	Fig. 2. Hercostomus fedotovae sp. nov., ♂, holotype (ZMUM). A. Habitus. B. Antenna. C. Fore tarsus. D. Distal appendages of epandrium. E. Hypopygium, left lateral view. F. Hypopygium, right lateral view.	2020-10-22	Grichanov, Igor Ya.		Zenodo	biologists	Grichanov, Igor Ya.			
03C088714E18FFEBFDA6FEC0FB53A11C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4122313/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4122313	Fig. 3. Hercostomus sanipass sp. nov., ♂, paratype, no date (NMSA). A. Habitus. B. Antenna. C. Fore tibia and tarsus. D. Hypopygium, right lateral view. E. Distoventral appendages of epandrium. F. Cercus.	Fig. 3. Hercostomus sanipass sp. nov., ♂, paratype, no date (NMSA). A. Habitus. B. Antenna. C. Fore tibia and tarsus. D. Hypopygium, right lateral view. E. Distoventral appendages of epandrium. F. Cercus.	2020-10-22	Grichanov, Igor Ya.		Zenodo	biologists	Grichanov, Igor Ya.			
03C088714E16FFEEFD97F94AFB53A5BC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4122315/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4122315	Fig. 4. Hercostomus koshelevae sp. nov., ♂, holotype (MNSA; A–C); ♂, paratype, Town Bush (MNSA; D–F). A. Habitus. B. Antenna. C. Fore tarsus. D. Hypopygium, right lateral view. E. Distoventral appendages of epandrium. F. Cercus.	Fig. 4. Hercostomus koshelevae sp. nov., ♂, holotype (MNSA; A–C); ♂, paratype, Town Bush (MNSA; D–F). A. Habitus. B. Antenna. C. Fore tarsus. D. Hypopygium, right lateral view. E. Distoventral appendages of epandrium. F. Cercus.	2020-10-22	Grichanov, Igor Ya.		Zenodo	biologists	Grichanov, Igor Ya.			
03C088714E13FFEDFDA1FCEBFBB5A665.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4122317/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4122317	Fig. 5. Hercostomus vikhrevi sp. nov., ♂, holotype (ZMUM). A. Habitus. B. Antenna. C. Fore tarsus. D. Hypopygium, right lateral view. E. Distoventral appendages of epandrium. F. Cercus.	Fig. 5. Hercostomus vikhrevi sp. nov., ♂, holotype (ZMUM). A. Habitus. B. Antenna. C. Fore tarsus. D. Hypopygium, right lateral view. E. Distoventral appendages of epandrium. F. Cercus.	2020-10-22	Grichanov, Igor Ya.		Zenodo	biologists	Grichanov, Igor Ya.			
03C088714E0FFFF0FF79FEB6FF7EA414.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4122309/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4122309	Fig. 1. Hercostomus brandbergensis sp. nov., ♂, paratype (NMNW). A. Habitus. B. Antenna. C. Mid femora, anterior view. D. Hypopygium, right lateral view. E. Distoventral appendages of epandrium. F. Cercus, surstylus and distal lobe of postgonite.	Fig. 1. Hercostomus brandbergensis sp. nov., ♂, paratype (NMNW). A. Habitus. B. Antenna. C. Mid femora, anterior view. D. Hypopygium, right lateral view. E. Distoventral appendages of epandrium. F. Cercus, surstylus and distal lobe of postgonite.	2020-10-22	Grichanov, Igor Ya.		Zenodo	biologists	Grichanov, Igor Ya.			
03C088714E0FFFF0FF79FEB6FF7EA414.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4122311/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4122311	Fig. 2. Hercostomus fedotovae sp. nov., ♂, holotype (ZMUM). A. Habitus. B. Antenna. C. Fore tarsus. D. Distal appendages of epandrium. E. Hypopygium, left lateral view. F. Hypopygium, right lateral view.	Fig. 2. Hercostomus fedotovae sp. nov., ♂, holotype (ZMUM). A. Habitus. B. Antenna. C. Fore tarsus. D. Distal appendages of epandrium. E. Hypopygium, left lateral view. F. Hypopygium, right lateral view.	2020-10-22	Grichanov, Igor Ya.		Zenodo	biologists	Grichanov, Igor Ya.			
03C088714E0FFFF0FF79FEB6FF7EA414.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4122313/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4122313	Fig. 3. Hercostomus sanipass sp. nov., ♂, paratype, no date (NMSA). A. Habitus. B. Antenna. C. Fore tibia and tarsus. D. Hypopygium, right lateral view. E. Distoventral appendages of epandrium. F. Cercus.	Fig. 3. Hercostomus sanipass sp. nov., ♂, paratype, no date (NMSA). A. Habitus. B. Antenna. C. Fore tibia and tarsus. D. Hypopygium, right lateral view. E. Distoventral appendages of epandrium. F. Cercus.	2020-10-22	Grichanov, Igor Ya.		Zenodo	biologists	Grichanov, Igor Ya.			
03C088714E0FFFF0FF79FEB6FF7EA414.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4122315/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4122315	Fig. 4. Hercostomus koshelevae sp. nov., ♂, holotype (MNSA; A–C); ♂, paratype, Town Bush (MNSA; D–F). A. Habitus. B. Antenna. C. Fore tarsus. D. Hypopygium, right lateral view. E. Distoventral appendages of epandrium. F. Cercus.	Fig. 4. Hercostomus koshelevae sp. nov., ♂, holotype (MNSA; A–C); ♂, paratype, Town Bush (MNSA; D–F). A. Habitus. B. Antenna. C. Fore tarsus. D. Hypopygium, right lateral view. E. Distoventral appendages of epandrium. F. Cercus.	2020-10-22	Grichanov, Igor Ya.		Zenodo	biologists	Grichanov, Igor Ya.			
03C088714E0FFFF0FF79FEB6FF7EA414.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4122317/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4122317	Fig. 5. Hercostomus vikhrevi sp. nov., ♂, holotype (ZMUM). A. Habitus. B. Antenna. C. Fore tarsus. D. Hypopygium, right lateral view. E. Distoventral appendages of epandrium. F. Cercus.	Fig. 5. Hercostomus vikhrevi sp. nov., ♂, holotype (ZMUM). A. Habitus. B. Antenna. C. Fore tarsus. D. Hypopygium, right lateral view. E. Distoventral appendages of epandrium. F. Cercus.	2020-10-22	Grichanov, Igor Ya.		Zenodo	biologists	Grichanov, Igor Ya.			
