taxonID	type	description	language	source
AD92B3251D57BA899491A564D57C01C5.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. Eleven females and 21 juveniles, two females and one juvenile from Cernica forest, Ilfov County, Romania on slide numbers NE 35 - 37 stored at the reference collection of the National Phytosanitary Laboratory, Voluntari, Romania, 9 females and 20 juveniles - at the personal collection of the first author; nine females and 30 juveniles from Bran, Brasov County, Romania, stored in the nematode collection of IBER, Bulgaria, slide numbers N 2 - 29 / 2 / 1 - 19.	en	Groza, Mariana, Lazarova, Stela, Luca, Francesca De, Fanelli, Elena, Milka Elshishka,, Radoslavov, Georgi, Hristov, Peter, Coman, Mihaela, Peneva, Vlada (2017): The morphological and molecular identity of Longidoruspiceicola Liskova, Robbins & Brown, 1997 from Romania (Nematoda, Dorylaimida). ZooKeys 667: 1-19, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.667.12011, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.667.12011
AD92B3251D57BA899491A564D57C01C5.taxon	description	Description. Figures 1 - 7. Measurements See Tables 1 - 3. Females (Figs 1 A, B 1 - 4, G 2 - 4, 5 E, 6 E, J, O, 7) based on the Larix population, Bran, Brasov County. Habitus spiral shaped, more strongly coiled in posterior part of body. Cuticle 3 - 4 μm thick at guide ring region, ca 3 μm in mid-body, and 5 - 6 μm on tail posterior to anus. Lip region broadly rounded anteriorly, rounded laterally, almost continuous with rest of body. Amphideal fovea pocket-shaped, varying from not lobed to symmetrically bilobed at base (according to terminology proposed by Decraemer and Coomans 2007) extending to ca half the distance anterior end-guide ring. Left and right fovea of about equal size (12.7 (11 - 14) μm, n = 5), sensillar pouch (fusus) just posterior the guide ring, the distance from the fovea to fusus 24 (23 - 29 μm). Pharyngeal bulb occupying 25 (22 - 29) % of total pharynx length; dorsal nucleus located at 29.5 (27 - 32) % (n = 7) of bulb length; ventro-sublateral nuclei at 54 (48 - 57) % (n = 8) (left) and 54 (52 - 56.5) % (n = 8) (right); opening of the dorsal gland at 9 (7.5 - 11) % and opening of the ventro-sublateral glands at 84 (80.5 - 90.5) % of the distance from anterior end of pharyngeal bulb, respectively. In one female, a small vestigium (5 μm) observed in wall of slender pharynx. Two nerve rings observed, the first one at 207.2 + / - 8.8 (193 - 218) μm from anterior end, surrounding about mid-odontophore; the second at 329 + / - 11.6 (313 - 344) μm from anterior end, n = 6, (first at 235.7 + / - 12.7 (215 - 255) and second at 329.3 + / - 18.6 (290 - 343) μm from anterior end, n = 7, Cernica forest). Tail bluntly conical, dorsally convex, flat or shallowly concave ventrally. Two pairs of caudal pores. Reproductive system didelphic, two branches of about equal size. Vagina occupies ca 50 % of corresponding body width; pars distalis vaginae and pars proximalis vaginae 13 - 15 μm and 15 - 19 μm long, respectively. Uteri short, anterior uterus 96.3 + / - 13.5 (80 - 120) μm long, posterior 91.0 + / - 10.5 (76 - 107) μm. Uteri shorter in Cernica population - anterior uterus 80.9 + / - 7.0 (70 - 90) μm long and posterior 78.3 + / - 8.3 (70 - 95) μm long. Sphincter between uterus and pars dilatata oviductus well developed. Sperm observed in both uteri of one female. In the population from Cernica forest two females with reserve odontostyles have been observed (Table 3). Male. Not found. Juveniles (Figs 1 C-F, H-K; 6 A-D, F-I, K-N, 7). General morphology similar to adult females. Body habitus similar in all stages, open C- to J-shaped. Tail of all juvenile stages conical, but becoming more rounded and c' decreasing in subsequent stages: tail of first stage juvenile elongate conoid with slightly digitate terminus, in the second stage - elongate conoid, in third - bluntly conoid, variable, with narrow to widely rounded terminus, in fourth - resembling that of female, bluntly conoid (Fig. 5). In several juveniles, the abnormalities in their development did not allow to assign them to a particular stage and the morphometrics are presented separately (Table 3). The lengths of functional and replacement odontostyles used to infer the developmental stages were in contradiction with other measurements such as L, a, b, c etc. which were in correspondence with a different stage, or the functional odontostyle was in the ranges of one stage while the replacement one was not in the ranges of the next stage; in one occasion the length of replacement odontostyle was less than that of the replacement one (Table 3).	en	Groza, Mariana, Lazarova, Stela, Luca, Francesca De, Fanelli, Elena, Milka Elshishka,, Radoslavov, Georgi, Hristov, Peter, Coman, Mihaela, Peneva, Vlada (2017): The morphological and molecular identity of Longidoruspiceicola Liskova, Robbins & Brown, 1997 from Romania (Nematoda, Dorylaimida). ZooKeys 667: 1-19, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.667.12011, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.667.12011
