identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
578989F2044457872E0C5C1C8CEDB03B.text	578989F2044457872E0C5C1C8CEDB03B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Habroteleia Kieffer	<div><p>Habroteleia Kieffer</p><p>Habroteleia Kieffer, 1905: 14 (original description. Type: Habroteleia flavipes Kieffer, by monotypy); Kieffer 1908: 114 (keyed); Brues 1908: 27, 38 (diagnosis, list of species, keyed); Kieffer 1910: 63, 69 (description, list of species, keyed); Kieffer 1913: 220 (description); Kieffer 1926: 267, 363 (description, keyed, key to species); Muesebeck and Walkley 1956: 357 (citation of type species); Baltazar 1961: 395 (synonymy); Baltazar 1966: 177 (cataloged, catalog of species of the Philippines); Masner 1976: 10, 26 (description, keyed); Mani and Sharma 1982: 155, 167 (description, keyed); Johnson 1992: 398 (cataloged, catalog of world species); Austin and Field 1997: 24, 68 (structure of ovipositor system, discussion of phylogenetic relationships, genus misplaced in Calliscelionini); Lê 2000: 31 (keyed); Kononova and Kozlov 2008: 23, 255 (description, keyed); Chen et al. 2013: 11 (keyed).</p><p>http://zoobank.org/CBFA7C74-68DD-44F2-BE05-AEBD88E6FA8D</p><p>http://bioguid.osu.edu/xbiod_concepts/488</p><p>Chrestoteleia Kieffer, 1913: 388 (original description. Type: Chrestoteleia bakeri Kieffer, by monotypy and original designation. Synonymized by Baltazar (1961)); Kieffer 1926: 271, 442 (description, keyed, key to species); Muesebeck and Walkley 1956: 342 (citation of type species); Baltazar 1961: 395 (junior synonym of Habroteleia Kieffer); Baltazar 1966: 182 (cataloged, catalog of species of the Philippines).</p><p>http://zoobank.org/4EA90A05-D50A-42BF-B1C0-852F4B56FCBA</p><p>http://bioguid.osu.edu/xbiod_concepts/8933</p><p>Crestoteleia Kieffer: Kieffer 1916: 180 (key to new species described from the Philippines, spelling error).</p><p>Description.</p><p>Length 2.18-5.18 mm; body moderately to markedly elongate, robust.</p><p>Head. Head shape in dorsal view: transverse. Hyperoccipital carina: absent. Occipital carina: present, complete or broadly interrupted medially. Anterior margin of occipital carina: crenulate. OOL: lateral ocellus nearly contiguous with inner orbits, OOL &lt;0.5 OD; lateral ocellus contiguous with inner orbit. Upper frons: convex, without frontal shelf or carina. Antennal scrobe: broadly convex or conave medially with distinct depression. Sculpture of antennal scrobe: smooth to punctate. Submedian carina: absent. Orbital carina: absent. Inner orbits: diverging ventrally. IOS/EH: IOS distinctly less than EH. Interantennal process: short, often excavate medially. Central keel: present or absent. Antennal foramen: oriented laterally on interantennal process. Facial striae: absent. Malar sulcus: present. Setation of compound eye: absent. Gena: broad, convex, distinctly produced behind eye. Clypeus shape: narrow, slightly convex medially, lateral corners not produced. Anterior (or ventral) margin of clypeus: straight. Anteclypeus: absent. Postclypeus: absent. Labrum: not visible in anterior view. Number of mandibular teeth: 2. Arrangement of mandibular teeth: transverse. Number of maxillary palpomeres: 4. Shape of maxillary palpomeres: cylindrical. Number of labial palpomeres: 2.</p><p>Antenna. Number of antennomeres in female: 12. Number of antennomeres in male: 12. Insertion of radicle into A1: parallel to longitudinal axis of A1. Shape of A1: more or less cylindrical, not flattened. Length of A3 of female: distinctly longer than A2. Number of clavomeres in female antenna: 6. Number of antennomeres with multiporous plate sensilla in female: 5. Arrangement of doubled multiporous plate sensilla on female clava: in longitudinal pairs. Number of antennomeres bearing tyloids in male antenna: 0. Shape of male flagellum: filiform.</p><p>Mesosoma. Transverse pronotal carina: present anterior to epomial carina, present or absent posterior to epomial carina. Posterior apex of pronotum in dorsal view: straight, bifid apically to articulate with tegula. Epomial carina: present. Anterior face of pronotum: oblique, visible dorsally, short. Lateral face of pronotum: weakly concave below position of dorsal epomial carina. Netrion: present. Netrion shape: moderately wide, open ventrally. Anterior portion of mesoscutum: vertical, flexed ventrally to meet pronotum. Mesoscutum shape: pentagonal, excavate at base of wings. Skaphion: absent. Notauli: present, percurrent. Parapsidal lines: absent. Antero-admedian lines: absent. Transscutal articulation: well-developed, narrow. Shape of mesoscutellum: trapezoidal. Lateral mesoscutellar spine: absent. Median mesoscutellar spine: absent. Axillular spine: absent. Surface of mesoscutellum: convex throughout. Median longitudinal furrow on mesoscutellum: absent; present. Metascutellum: clearly differentiated. Form of metascutellum: transverse. Posterior margin of metascutellum: straight with a small projection medially. Setation of metascutellum: absent. Metapostnotum: not defined externally. Lateral propodeal projection: present. Median propodeal projection: present. Mesopleural carina: present. Mesal course of acetabular carina: not separating fore coxae. Mesopleural pit: present. Posterodorsal corner of mesopleuron: rounded anteriorly.</p><p>Legs. Number of mesotibial spurs: 1. Number of metatibial spurs: 1. Dorsal surface of metacoxa: smooth; punctate. Shape of metacoxa: cylindrical, ecarinate. Trochantellus: indicated by transverse sulcus on femur.</p><p>Wings. Wing development of female: macropterous. Wing development of male: macropterous. Tubular veins in fore wing: present. Bulla of fore wing R: absent. Length of marginal vein of fore wing: more than twice as long as stigmal vein. Origin of r-rs in fore wing: arising from marginal vein along costal margin. Basal vein (Rs+M) in fore wing: absent. Development of R vein in hind wing: complete.</p><p>Metasoma. Number of external metasomal tergites in female: 6. Number of external metasoma sternites in female: 6. Number of external metasomal tergites in male: 8 . Number of external metasomal sternites in male: 8. Shape of metasoma: lanceolate. Laterotergites: present, narrow. Laterosternites: present. T1 of female: flat; medially convex as a small hump anteriorly. Relative size of metasomal segments: T3 longest, T2 and T4 subequal in length. Metasomal tergites with basal crenulae: T2. Sublateral carinae on tergites: absent. Median longitudinal carina on metasomal terga: absent. Shape of female T6: flattened. Anterior margin of S1: not produced anteriorly, straight. Felt fields: absent. Ovipositor: Ceratobaeus -type (Austin and Field 1997).</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Habroteleia can be separated from other scelionines by the combination of the following characters: epomial carina present; malar and facial striae absent; marginal vein many times longer than stigmal vein; postmarginal vein (R1) absent or rudimentary; propodeum with lateral and median projections; T6 in females strongly depressed dorsoventrally to form a flat triangle; male antenna without tyloid (Chen et al. 2013).</p><p>The wing venation and large size of Habroteleia make it a relatively easy genus to identify. In all species of Habroteleia the marginal vein is many times longer than the stigmal vein and the postmarginal vein is very short or absent. Macroteleia and Triteleia share the presence of a long marginal vein, though in the latter genus it is variable and the marginal and stigmal veins can be of similar length. However, both Macroteleia and Triteleia have a well-developed postmarginal vein. Habroteleia also differs from these genera in that it has a Ceratobaeus -type ovipositor (Austin and Field 1997). The complexity of this system suggests that while these three genera are quite similar in external appearance, in fact they may not be closely related at all. Alternatively, it implies that the ovipositor system is much more labile than expected. Unfortunately, Habroteleia was not included among the taxa in the phylogenetic analysis of Murphy et al. (2007), and we therefore do not have an independent assessment of its relations. The structure of the ovipositor is of limited use for separating Habroteleia from Triteleia because it is rarely extruded in preserved specimens of the latter, and it is not obvious from external morphology (e.g. visibility of T7 in females) that Habroteleia has a Ceratobaeus -type ovipositor. Chen et al. (2013) provided a key to separate these genera which we here present again.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/578989F2044457872E0C5C1C8CEDB03B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Chen, Hua-yan;Talamas, Elijah J.;Masner, Lubomir;Johnson, Norman F.	Chen, Hua-yan, Talamas, Elijah J., Masner, Lubomir, Johnson, Norman F. (2018): Revision of the world species of the genus Habroteleia Kieffer (Hymenoptera, Platygastridae, Scelioninae). ZooKeys 730: 85-120, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21846, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21846
6EA27F29ADCCB192D155988A5C96DDEA.text	6EA27F29ADCCB192D155988A5C96DDEA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Baryconus vindhiensis (Sharma)	<div><p>Baryconus vindhiensis (Sharma) comb. n. Figures 7-10</p><p>Triteleia vindhiensis Sharma, 1981: 451 (original description); Mani and Sharma 1982: 168 (description, generic transfer).</p><p>Habroteleia vindhiensis (Sharma): Johnson 1992: 399 (cataloged, type information).</p><p>Link to distribution map.</p><p>[http://hol.osu.edu/map-large.html?id=4540]</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>Holotype, female, T. vindhiensis: INDIA: Madhya Pradesh St., 21.5, Panna-Satna Road, 9. IX– 10.IX.1979, M. S. Mani et al., USNMENT01197073 (deposited in USNM).</p><p>Comments.</p><p>The deep frontal depression margined by a sharp carina (Fig. 8), pronounced occiput (Fig. 9), long postmarginal vein and short marginal vein (Fig. 9) clearly indicate that this species belongs to Baryconus .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6EA27F29ADCCB192D155988A5C96DDEA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Chen, Hua-yan;Talamas, Elijah J.;Masner, Lubomir;Johnson, Norman F.	Chen, Hua-yan, Talamas, Elijah J., Masner, Lubomir, Johnson, Norman F. (2018): Revision of the world species of the genus Habroteleia Kieffer (Hymenoptera, Platygastridae, Scelioninae). ZooKeys 730: 85-120, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21846, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21846
86FA39E0D260A59F8ACCE7249E1A7A33.text	86FA39E0D260A59F8ACCE7249E1A7A33.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Habroteleia flavipes Kieffer	<div><p>Habroteleia flavipes Kieffer Figures 6, 11-16, 17-22, 23-28, 29-34, 35-40, 88</p><p>Habroteleia flavipes Kieffer, 1905: 15 (original description, keyed); Kieffer 1926: 363 (description, keyed); Bin 1974: 455 (type information); Johnson 1992: 399 (cataloged, type information).</p><p>Habroteleia browni Crawford, 1910: 125 (original description); Kieffer 1926: 363, 364 (description, keyed); Baltazar 1966: 177 (cataloged, synonymy, type information, distribution); Masner and Muesebeck 1968: 37 (type information); Johnson 1992: 399 (cataloged, type information), syn. n.</p><p>http://zoobank.org/EC09DB18-92D9-4FB1-B986-3F7EAD7D54E4</p><p>http://bioguid.osu.edu/xbiod_concepts/4534</p><p>Chrestoteleia Bakeri Kieffer, 1913: 389 (original description); Kelner-Pillault 1958: 150 (type information); Johnson 1992: 399 (type information), syn. n.</p><p>http://zoobank.org/F18A3905-9A5A-4755-A56A-5379E8564044</p><p>http://bioguid.osu.edu/xbiod_concepts/8935</p><p>Chrestoteleia bakeri Kieffer: Kieffer, 1926: 443 (description, keyed); Baltazar 1966: 177 (junior synonym of Habroteleia browni Crawford); Baltazar 1966: 182 (cataloged, type information, distribution).</p><p>Habroteleia bakeri (Kieffer): Baltazar 1961: 395 (generic transfer, diagnosis).</p><p>Habroteleia bharatensis Saraswat, 1978: 7 (original description); Mani and Sharma 1982: 167 (description); Johnson 1992: 398 (cataloged), syn. n.</p><p>http://zoobank.org/309A96B1-1DCA-45CA-B1AB-1D6E570C7E07</p><p>http://bioguid.osu.edu/xbiod_concepts/4533</p><p>Triteleia kotturensis Sharma, 1981: 447 (original description), syn. n.</p><p>http://zoobank.org/28DFECE9-8723-4ACA-BB61-96B11C9546A8</p><p>http://bioguid.osu.edu/xbiod_concepts/8940</p><p>Habroteleia kotturensis (Sharma): Mani and Sharma 1982: 168 (description, generic transfer); Johnson 1992: 399 (cataloged, type information)</p><p>Description.</p><p>Body length of female: 4.36-4.72 mm (n=20). Body length of male: 4.15-4.52 mm (n=20). Length of A3 in male: longer than A2. Punctation of frons above antennal scrobe: dense. Sculpture of antennal scrobe: punctate rugose to smooth. Central keel: absent. Sculpture of ventrolateral frons: punctate rugose. Occipital carina: complete. Sculpture of posterior vertex: densely punctate to punctate rugose. Sculpture of gena: densely punctate to punctate rugose. Sculpture of occiput: punctate rugose.</p><p>Color of mesosoma: black. Sculpture of dorsal pronotal area: punctate rugose. Sculpture of lateral pronotal area: densely punctate. Sculpture of netrion: anterior half rugulose, posterior half smooth. Setae of netrion: dense throughout. Sculpture of notaulus: contiguously punctate. Sculpture of mesoscutal midlobe: largely punctate rugose, with a medial furrow and smooth areas laterally. Sculpture of lateral lobe of mesoscutum: sparsely punctate. Sculpture of lateral propodeal area: rugose. Setation of mesoscutellum: dense. Sculpture of mesoscutellum: coarsely punctate rugose. Median propodeal projection: short. Mesopleural carina: distinct. Sculpture of mesepisternum anteroventral to mesopleural depression: punctate rugose. Sculpture of dorsal metapleural area: smooth to rugulose. Sculpture of ventral metapleural area: punctate rugose. Setation of ventral metapleural area: dense. Color of legs: orange-yellow to dark brown; dark brown to black. Sculpture of hind coxa: densely punctate.</p><p>Color of metasoma: black; black with T3-T4 and S2-S5 partly brown to yellow. T1 horn in female: present. Sculpture of posterior margin of T1 in female: densely longitudinally striate, punctate rugulose in interstices. Transverse sulcus on T2: present. Sculpture of T2-T5: densely longitudinally striate, with fine punctures in interstices. Sculpture of T6 in female: densely longitudinally striate, with fine punctures in interstices. Length of T6 in female: distinctly longer than wide. Apex of T6 in female: round. Sculpture of S2: longitudinally striate rugose. Sculpture of T1 in male: densely longitudinally striate, punctate rugulose in interstices. Male T8 apical spine: present.</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>This species is most similar to H. persimilis but can be distinguished by its short median propodeal projection and longitudinally striate T6 in female.</p><p>Link to distribution map.</p><p>[http://hol.osu.edu/map-large.html?id=4535]</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>Holotype of Habroteleia flavipes Kieffer, female: INDONESIA: Sumatera Utara Prov., Sumatra Isl., Pangherang Pisang, X.1890 - III.1891, E. Modigliani, MCSN 0001 (deposited in MCSN). Holotype of Habroteleia bharatensis Saraswat, female: INDIA: West Bengal St., 16.4, Poro North, 6. IV– 24.IV.1976, M. S. Mani, USNMENT01197132 (deposited in USNM). Syntype of Chrestoteleia bakeri Kieffer, female: PHILIPPINES: Laguna Prov., Los Baños, no date, Baker, ANIC DB 32-020728 (deposited in ANIC). Syntype of Chrestoteleia Bakeri Kieffer, female: PHILIPPINES: Laguna Prov., Los Baños, no date, Baker, MNHN 0013 (deposited in MNHN). Holotype of Habroteleia browni Crawford, female: PHILIPPINES: Metropolitan Manila Reg., Manila, no date, R. Brown, USNM Type No. 12894 (deposited in USNM). Holotype of Triteleia kotturensis Sharma, female: INDIA: Kerala St., 24.8, Kottur, 4.X.1980, M. S. Mani et al., USNMENT01197074 (deposited in USNM). Other material: (137 females, 79 males, 1 unknown) BANGLADESH: 2 females, OSUC 688056-688057 (CNCI). BRUNEI: 1 female, OSUC 232932 (BPBM). CAMBODIA: 1 female, OSUC 232935 (BPBM). CHINA: 23 females, 7 males, OSUC 232920 (BPBM); SCAU 2010100389, 2010100402, 2010100419, 2010100431, 2010100437, 2010100445-2010100446, 2010100459, 2010100464, 2010100495, 2010100497, 2010100499, 2010100502, 2010100504-2010100505, 2010100508-2010100512, 2010100514, 2010100517-2010100518, 2010100521-2010100522, 2010100524-2010100526, 2010100552 (SCAU). INDIA: 1 male, OSUC 688053 (CNCI). INDONESIA: 58 females, 23 males, OSUC 232906 (BPBM); OSUC 687960-688009, 688014-688041 (CNCI); OSUC 58007-58008 (OSUC). LAOS: 2 females, 3 males, OSUC 687955-687959 (CNCI). MALAYSIA: 23 females, 26 males, OSUC 232907-232914, 232916-232919, 232923, 232931, 232933-232934, 232937, 246583 (BPBM); OSUC 687944-687954, 688058-688059 (CNCI); OSUC 491881-491896, 536427 (OSUC); OSUC 179084 (UCDC). PHILIPPINES: 1 female, 3 males, OSUC 232925-232928 (BPBM). SOUTH KOREA: 7 females, 2 males, 1 unknown, OSUC 687939 (CNCI); USNMENT01335741, 01335743-01335745, 01335747-01335749 (FSCA); USNMENT01335740, 01335742 (OSUC). SRI LANKA: 1 male, OSUC 688055 (CNCI). THAILAND: 16 females, 13 males, OSUC 232921-232922, 232924 (BPBM); OSUC 688042, 688049-688051 (CNCI); OSUC 321998-322002, 370249, 374199-374201, 381766-381770, 688080-688087 (OSUC). VIETNAM: 3 females, OSUC 232915 (BPBM); OSUC 688052 (CNCI); OSUC 284756 (OSUC).</p><p>Comments.</p><p>The metasomal color in H. flavipes varies from entirely dark brown to having T3-T4 and S2-S5 mostly yellow, apparently without any correlation with geography. In males, the length of the spine at the apex of T8 varies from short to long, but it is always present.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/86FA39E0D260A59F8ACCE7249E1A7A33	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Chen, Hua-yan;Talamas, Elijah J.;Masner, Lubomir;Johnson, Norman F.	Chen, Hua-yan, Talamas, Elijah J., Masner, Lubomir, Johnson, Norman F. (2018): Revision of the world species of the genus Habroteleia Kieffer (Hymenoptera, Platygastridae, Scelioninae). ZooKeys 730: 85-120, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21846, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21846
32C928E8BF5FA090763D50C655E53062.text	32C928E8BF5FA090763D50C655E53062.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Habroteleia impressa (Kieffer)	<div><p>Habroteleia impressa (Kieffer)</p><p>Crestoteleia impressa Kieffer, 1916: 180, 181 (original description, keyed, spelling error).</p><p>Chrestoteleia impressa Kieffer: Kieffer 1926: 443 (description, keyed); Baltazar 1966: 182 (cataloged, distribution).</p><p>Habroteleia impressa (Kieffer): Baltazar 1966: 177 (cataloged, generic transfer, distribution); Johnson 1992: 399 (cataloged, type information).</p><p>Comments.</p><p>We were unable to locate the type specimens of this species, and its status and identity are unclear.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/32C928E8BF5FA090763D50C655E53062	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Chen, Hua-yan;Talamas, Elijah J.;Masner, Lubomir;Johnson, Norman F.	Chen, Hua-yan, Talamas, Elijah J., Masner, Lubomir, Johnson, Norman F. (2018): Revision of the world species of the genus Habroteleia Kieffer (Hymenoptera, Platygastridae, Scelioninae). ZooKeys 730: 85-120, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21846, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21846
906362DABAC96532B39B224550310872.text	906362DABAC96532B39B224550310872.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Habroteleia mutabilis Chen & Talamas	<div><p>Habroteleia mutabilis Chen &amp; Talamas sp. n. Figures 1-2, 41-46, 47-52</p><p>Description.</p><p>Body length of female: 3.60-3.74 mm (n=20). Body length of male: 3.36-3.72 mm (n=20). Length of A3 in male: longer than A2. Punctation of frons above antennal scrobe: sparse. Sculpture of antennal scrobe: foveate. Central keel: absent. Sculpture of ventrolateral frons: denstly punctate. Occipital carina: complete. Sculpture of posterior vertex: punctate rugose. Sculpture of gena: punctate rugose ventrally, sparsely punctate dorsally. Sculpture of occiput: smooth.</p><p>Color of mesosoma: black; orange. Sculpture of dorsal pronotal area: punctate rugose. Sculpture of lateral pronotal area: smooth anteriorly, foveate posteriorly. Sculpture of netrion: coarsely striate. Setae of netrion: sparse throughout. Sculpture of notaulus: discretely punctate. Sculpture of mesoscutal midlobe: coarsely carinate with two rows of contiguous coarse punctures; largely smooth, with two rows of discrete coarse punctures. Sculpture of lateral lobe of mesoscutum: smooth. Sculpture of lateral propodeal area: foveate. Setation of mesoscutellum: sparse. Sculpture of mesoscutellum: sparsely punctate. Median propodeal projection: short; long. Mesopleural carina: distinct. Sculpture of mesepisternum anteroventral to mesopleural depression: smooth with a row of punctures along mesopleural carina. Sculpture of dorsal metapleural area: smooth. Sculpture of ventral metapleural area: smooth to foveate. Setation of ventral metapleural area: sparse. Color of legs: orange-yellow to dark brown; dark brown to black. Sculpture of hind coxa: smooth.</p><p>Color of metasoma: black; orange with dark brown to black patches. T1 horn in female: absent. Sculpture of posterior margin of T1 in female: sparsely longitudinally striate. Transverse sulcus on T2: absent. Sculpture of T2-T5: T2-T3 sparsely longitudinally striate throughout, T4-T5 smooth medially, longitudinally striate. Sculpture of T6 in female: smooth. Length of T6 in female: wider than long. Apex of T6 in female: round. Sculpture of S2: sparsely longitudinally striate. Sculpture of T1 in male: sparsely longitudinally striate, smooth in interstices. Male T8 apical spine: absent.</p><p>Etymology.</p><p>The epithet is inspired by the Latin word for changeable, in reference to the variations in body color, sculpture of mesoscutal midlobe, and the length of median propodeal projection, and is intended to be treated as an adjective.</p><p>Link to distribution map.</p><p>[http://hol.osu.edu/map-large.html?id=448460]</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>Holotype, female: FIJI: Northern Div., Bua Prov., Vanua Levu Isl., 6km NW Kilaka Village, MT5, 98m, 16.807°S, 178.991°E, Batiqere Range, 28. VI– 21.VII.2004, Malaise trap, Schlinger &amp; Tokota’a, FBA 142603 (deposited in BPBM). Paratypes: FIJI: 53 females, 27 males, FBA 070892, OSUC 232898, OSUC 232901, OSUC 232902, OSUC 232903, OSUC 232904, OSUC 232905 (BPBM); FBA 014394, 014404, 014409, 014413-014414, 019832, 025807, 025815, 029311, 029313, 029315, 029318-029320, 029323, 032077, 032086, 036322, 036328, 047849, 047855, 058998, 059005, 059026, 070887, 070893-070894, 082922, 084174-084175, 084181, 084183, 088442, 094483, 094485, 094487, 099217, 101111, 101129, 101568, 140945, 140956, 140961, 142806, 143124, 143130, 143134, 143209, 143217-143219, 144459, 151785, 151788, 164303, 166124, 166126, 166129, 166160, 166162-166163, 179833, 179838, 182136, 182139-182140, 182142, 186114, 188585, 188680, OSUC 688078, OSUC 688161, OSUC 688162 (CNCI). Other material: FIJI: 1 female, 1 male, OSUC 232900 (BPBM); FBA 084185 (CNCI).</p><p>Comments.</p><p>This species is well supported by many characters, although the color of mesosoma and metasoma, sculpture of mesoscutal midlobe, and the length of median propodeal projection are variable. The color of mesosoma and metasoma varies from orange to dark brown. The sculpture of the mesoscutal midlobe varies from largely smooth with two rows of discrete coarse punctures to coarsely carinate with two rows of contiguous coarse punctures. The length of the median propodeal projection varies from short to long. These variations are gradual among specimens. Therefore, we consider them as intraspecific rather than interspecific differences.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/906362DABAC96532B39B224550310872	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Chen, Hua-yan;Talamas, Elijah J.;Masner, Lubomir;Johnson, Norman F.	Chen, Hua-yan, Talamas, Elijah J., Masner, Lubomir, Johnson, Norman F. (2018): Revision of the world species of the genus Habroteleia Kieffer (Hymenoptera, Platygastridae, Scelioninae). ZooKeys 730: 85-120, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21846, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21846
60FDD43E90F9BD691BF73A52665FCE55.text	60FDD43E90F9BD691BF73A52665FCE55.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Habroteleia persimilis (Kozlov & Kononova)	<div><p>Habroteleia persimilis (Kozlov &amp; Kononova) Figures 53-58, 59-64, 89-90</p><p>Triteleia persimilis Kozlov &amp; Kononova, 1985: 15, 17 (original description. Keyed); Kozlov and Kononova 1990: 174, 178 (description, keyed); Johnson 1992: 509 (cataloged, type information); Kononova 1995: 69 (keyed); Kononova and Petrov 2000: 28 (keyed).</p><p>Habroteleia persimilis (Kozlov &amp; Kononova): Kononova and Kozlov 2008: 255 (description, generic transfer).</p><p>Triteleia dagavia Kozlov &amp; Lê, 1995: 441, 445 (original description, keyed); Kozlov and Lê 1996: 9, 14 (described as new, keyed); Lê 2000: 76, 341 (description, keyed, type information), syn. n.</p><p>http://zoobank.org/451262B6-B23F-487F-A870-AAB91CB1E35A</p><p>http://bioguid.osu.edu/xbiod_concepts/28154</p><p>Habroteleia dagavia (Kozlov &amp; Lê): Talamas and Pham 2017: 227 (type information, generic transfer).</p><p>Description.</p><p>Body length of female: 4.75-5.18 mm (n=20). Body length of male: 4.25-4.74 mm (n=20). Length of A3 in male: longer than A2. Punctation of frons above antennal scrobe: dense. Sculpture of antennal scrobe: punctate rugose to smooth. Central keel: present. Sculpture of ventrolateral frons: punctate rugose. Occipital carina: complete. Sculpture of posterior vertex: punctate rugose. Sculpture of gena: punctate rugose. Sculpture of occiput: densely finely punctate.</p><p>Color of mesosoma: black. Sculpture of dorsal pronotal area: punctate rugose. Sculpture of lateral pronotal area: smooth anteriorly, foveate posteriorly. Sculpture of netrion: coarsely striate. Setae of netrion: sparse throughout. Sculpture of notaulus: contiguously punctate. Sculpture of mesoscutal midlobe: largely densely punctate, with a medial furrow and smooth areas laterally. Sculpture of lateral lobe of mesoscutum: sparsely punctate. Sculpture of lateral propodeal area: rugose. Setation of mesoscutellum: dense. Sculpture of mesoscutellum: coarsely punctate rugose. Median propodeal projection: long. Mesopleural carina: distinct. Sculpture of mesepisternum anteroventral to mesopleural depression: punctate rugose. Sculpture of dorsal metapleural area: smooth . Sculpture of ventral metapleural area: rugose. Setation of ventral metapleural area: dense. Color of legs: orange-yellow. Sculpture of hind coxa: densely punctate.</p><p>Color of metasoma: black. T1 horn in female: present. Sculpture of posterior margin of T1 in female: largely longitudinally striate with horn punctate rugose. Transverse sulcus on T2: present. Sculpture of T2-T5: densely longitudinally striate, with fine punctures in interstices. Sculpture of T6 in female: densely punctate. Length of T6 in female: distinctly longer than wide. Apex of T6 in female: round. Sculpture of S2: densely longitudinally striate, punctate in interstices. Sculpture of T1 in male: densely longitudinally striate, punctate rugulose in interstices. Male T8 apical spine: absent.</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>This species is most similar to H. flavipes but can be distinguished by its long median propodeal projection and densely punctate T6 in female.</p><p>Link to distribution map.</p><p>[http://hol.osu.edu/map-large.html?id=243852]</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>Holotype, female, T. persimilis: JAPAN: Aichi Pref., Honshu Isl., Inuyama City, 6.X.1981, E. Sugonyaev, ZIN 0014 (deposited in ZIN). Holotype of Triteleia dagavia Kozlov &amp; Lê, female: VIETNAM: Quang Nam Prov., Lang Stream, forest, Dak Pring, 31.X.1979, X. H. Lê, IEBR 0143 (deposited in IEBR). Other material: (48 females, 43 males) CHINA: 6 females, 10 males, SCAU 2010100315-2010100317, 2010100319-2010100320, 2010100322, 2010100330, 2010100335, 2010100337-2010100340, 2010100347, 2010100349, 2010100352-2010100353 (SCAU). JAPAN: 40 females, 29 males, OSUC 687863, 687865-687909, 687914-687936 (CNCI). SOUTH KOREA: 2 females, 4 males, OSUC 687937-687938, 687940-687943 (CNCI).</p><p>Comments.</p><p>Habroteleia persimilis, like H. flavipes, has a distribution that spans a large latitudinal range, extending from central Vietnam into the Palearctic region in Japan and South Korea.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/60FDD43E90F9BD691BF73A52665FCE55	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Chen, Hua-yan;Talamas, Elijah J.;Masner, Lubomir;Johnson, Norman F.	Chen, Hua-yan, Talamas, Elijah J., Masner, Lubomir, Johnson, Norman F. (2018): Revision of the world species of the genus Habroteleia Kieffer (Hymenoptera, Platygastridae, Scelioninae). ZooKeys 730: 85-120, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21846, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21846
7E4CFE61ADF81ED0C46DC9C3C5D7E54A.text	7E4CFE61ADF81ED0C46DC9C3C5D7E54A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Habroteleia ruficoxa (Kieffer)	<div><p>Habroteleia ruficoxa (Kieffer) Figures 65-70</p><p>Phaedroteleia ruficoxa Kieffer, 1916: 182, 183 (original description. Keyed); Kieffer 1926: 418 (description, keyed); Kelner-Pillault 1958: 151 (type information); Baltazar 1966: 181 (cataloged, type information, distribution).</p><p>Habroteleia ruficoxa (Kieffer): Masner 1976: 26 (generic transfer); Johnson 1992: 399 (cataloged, type information).</p><p>Description.</p><p>Body length of male: 4.0 mm (n=1). Length of A3 in male: as long as A2.</p><p>Punctation of frons above antennal scrobe: sparse. Sculpture of antennal scrobe: foveate. Central keel: present. Sculpture of ventrolateral frons: punctate rugose. Occipital carina: complete. Sculpture of posterior vertex: punctate rugose. Sculpture of gena: punctate rugose. Sculpture of occiput: smooth.</p><p>Color of mesosoma: black. Sculpture of dorsal pronotal area: punctate rugose. Sculpture of lateral pronotal area: smooth anteriorly, foveate posteriorly. Sculpture of netrion: coarsely striate. Setae of netrion: dense throughout. Sculpture of notaulus: discretely punctate. Sculpture of mesoscutal midlobe: densely punctate. Sculpture of lateral lobe of mesoscutum: sparsely punctate. Sculpture of lateral propodeal area: rugose. Setation of mesoscutellum: sparse. Sculpture of mesoscutellum: sparsely punctate. Median propodeal projection: short. Mesopleural carina: distinct. Sculpture of mesepisternum anteroventral to mesopleural depression: largely smooth with sparse punctures. Sculpture of dorsal metapleural area: rugose. Sculpture of ventral metapleural area: rugose. Setation of ventral metapleural area: dense. Color of legs: orange-yellow. Sculpture of hind coxa: densely punctate.</p><p>Color of metasoma: black. Transverse sulcus on T2: present. Sculpture of T2-T5: sparsely longitudinally striate, smooth in interstices. Sculpture of T1 in male: sparsely longitudinally striate, smooth in interstices. Male T8 apical spine: absent.</p><p>Link to distribution map.</p><p>[http://hol.osu.edu/map-large.html?id=4538]</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>Holotype, male, P. ruficoxa: PHILIPPINES: Mindanao Isl., Butuan Chartered City, no date, Baker, MNHN_EY3427 (deposited in MNHN).</p><p>Comments.</p><p>The holotype specimen of Habroteleia ruficoxa is in reasonably good condition in that the characters used for diagnosis at the species level are readily accessible. The challenge is that the species was described from a single male and in the course of this revision we did not encounter any additional specimens of H. ruficoxa . The absence of a spine on T8 in the male, the largely smooth surface of the mesos cutum and mesoscutellum, and the notauli weakly indicated by punctures place the holotype specimen well outside of our concept of H. flavipes, the only other species of Habroteleia known from the Philippines.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7E4CFE61ADF81ED0C46DC9C3C5D7E54A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Chen, Hua-yan;Talamas, Elijah J.;Masner, Lubomir;Johnson, Norman F.	Chen, Hua-yan, Talamas, Elijah J., Masner, Lubomir, Johnson, Norman F. (2018): Revision of the world species of the genus Habroteleia Kieffer (Hymenoptera, Platygastridae, Scelioninae). ZooKeys 730: 85-120, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21846, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21846
FC80096C1F3A4B3506204D6740639F08.text	FC80096C1F3A4B3506204D6740639F08.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Habroteleia salebra Chen & Talamas	<div><p>Habroteleia salebra Chen &amp; Talamas sp. n. Figures 3, 71-76</p><p>Description .</p><p>Body length of female: 4.28-4.90 mm (n=20). Body length of male: 4.30-4.73mm (n=20). Length of A3 in male: longer than A2. Punctation of frons above antennal scrobe: sparse. Sculpture of antennal scrobe: smooth. Central keel: absent. Sculpture of ventrolateral frons: punctate rugose. Occipital carina: interrupted medially. Sculpture of posterior vertex: smooth with sparse punctures. Sculpture of gena: sparsely punctate. Sculpture of occiput: densely finely punctate.</p><p>Color of mesosoma: black. Sculpture of dorsal pronotal area: punctate rugose. Sculpture of lateral pronotal area: smooth anteriorly, foveate posteriorly. Sculpture of netrion: coarsely striate. Setae of netrion: sparse throughout. Sculpture of notaulus: discretely punctate. Sculpture of mesoscutal midlobe: densely and finely punctate along anterior margin, sparsely punctate along posterior margin, otherwise smooth. Sculpture of lateral lobe of mesoscutum: smooth. Sculpture of lateral propodeal area: rugose. Setation of mesoscutellum: sparse. Sculpture of mesoscutellum: coarsely punctate rugose. Median propodeal projection: short. Mesopleural carina: weakly developed. Sculpture of mesepisternum anteroventral to mesopleural depression: largely smooth with sparse punctures. Sculpture of dorsal metapleural area: smooth. Sculpture of ventral metapleural area: punctate rugose. Setation of ventral metapleural area: dense. Color of legs: dark brown to black. Sculpture of hind coxa: densely punctate.</p><p>Color of metasoma: black. T1 horn in female: present. Sculpture of posterior margin of T1 in female: densely longitudinally striate, punctate rugulose in interstices. Transverse sulcus on T2: present. Sculpture of T2-T5: densely longitudinally striate, with fine punctures in interstices. Sculpture of T6 in female: densely punctate. Length of T6 in female: distinctly longer than wide. Apex of T6 in female: round. Sculpture of S2: sparsely longitudinally striate medially, with fine punctures in interstices, irregularly finely punctate laterally. Sculpture of T1 in male: densely longitudinally striate, punctate rugulose in interstices. Male T8 apical spine: present.</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>This species is most similar to H. spinosa but can be distinguished by the round apex of T6 in females and the absence of a spine on the apex of T8 in males.</p><p>Etymology.</p><p>The epithet is inspired by the Latin word for a rough, uneven road, in reference to the glabrous netrion sulcus adjacent to the setose posterior portion of the netrion, and is intended to be treated as a noun in apposition.</p><p>Link to distribution map.</p><p>[http://hol.osu.edu/map-large.html?id=448456]</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>Holotype, female: PAPUA NEW GUINEA: Madang Prov., 100m, 04°16'S 144°58'E, Morox, 1. VIII– 18.VIII.2006, yellow pan trap, V. Iwam, OSUC 688076 (deposited in CNCI). Paratypes: (21 females, 12 males) INDONESIA: 1 female, OSUC 232875 (BPBM). PAPUA NEW GUINEA: 20 females, 12 males, OSUC 232876-232877, 232879-232884, 232886, 232890-232892, 232894-232897 (BPBM); OSUC 688060-688063, 688065-688075, 688077 (CNCI).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FC80096C1F3A4B3506204D6740639F08	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Chen, Hua-yan;Talamas, Elijah J.;Masner, Lubomir;Johnson, Norman F.	Chen, Hua-yan, Talamas, Elijah J., Masner, Lubomir, Johnson, Norman F. (2018): Revision of the world species of the genus Habroteleia Kieffer (Hymenoptera, Platygastridae, Scelioninae). ZooKeys 730: 85-120, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21846, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21846
7BB39CFD6985B028B647C0B137DBBAFB.text	7BB39CFD6985B028B647C0B137DBBAFB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Habroteleia scapularis (Kieffer)	<div><p>Habroteleia scapularis (Kieffer)</p><p>Crestoteleia scapularis Kieffer, 1916: 180 (original description, keyed, spelling error).</p><p>Chrestoteleia scapularis Kieffer: Kieffer 1926: 443, 444 (description, keyed); Baltazar 1966: 182 (cataloged, distribution).</p><p>Habroteleia scapularis (Kieffer): Baltazar 1966: 177 (cataloged, generic transfer, distribution); Johnson 1992: 399 (cataloged, type information).</p><p>Comments.</p><p>We were not able to locate the type specimens of this species, and its status and identity are unclear.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7BB39CFD6985B028B647C0B137DBBAFB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Chen, Hua-yan;Talamas, Elijah J.;Masner, Lubomir;Johnson, Norman F.	Chen, Hua-yan, Talamas, Elijah J., Masner, Lubomir, Johnson, Norman F. (2018): Revision of the world species of the genus Habroteleia Kieffer (Hymenoptera, Platygastridae, Scelioninae). ZooKeys 730: 85-120, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21846, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21846
8A0B4EB80FBC1A9ABF605E44659E68E7.text	8A0B4EB80FBC1A9ABF605E44659E68E7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Habroteleia soa Chen & Talamas	<div><p>Habroteleia soa Chen &amp; Talamas sp. n. Figures 77-81</p><p>Description.</p><p>Body length of female: 3.72 mm (n=1). Length of A3 in male: longer than A2. Length of A3 in male: longer than A2. Punctation of frons above antennal scrobe: dense. Sculpture of antennal scrobe: smooth. Central keel: present. Sculpture of ventrolateral frons: punctate rugose. Occipital carina: complete. Sculpture of posterior vertex: punctate rugose. Sculpture of gena: punctate rugose ventrally, sparsely punctate dorsally. Sculpture of occiput: rugulose.</p><p>Color of mesosoma: black. Sculpture of dorsal pronotal area: punctate rugose. Sculpture of lateral pronotal area: smooth anteriorly, foveate posteriorly. Sculpture of netrion: coarsely striate. Setae of netrion: sparse throughout. Sculpture of notaulus: contiguously punctate. Sculpture of mesoscutal midlobe: punctate rugose on the anterior margin, otherwise largely smooth with two rows of discrete punctures. Sculpture of lateral lobe of mesoscutum: smooth. Sculpture of lateral propodeal area: rugose. Setation of mesoscutellum: sparse. Sculpture of mesoscutellum: coarsely punctate rugose. Median propodeal projection: short. Mesopleural carina: weakly developed. Sculpture of mesepisternum anteroventral to mesopleural depression: smooth with a row of punctures along mesopleural carina. Sculpture of dorsal metapleural area: smooth. Sculpture of ventral metapleural area: punctate rugose. Setation of ventral metapleural area: sparse. Color of legs: orange-yellow to dark brown. Sculpture of hind coxa: smooth.</p><p>Color of metasoma: black. T1 horn in female: absent. Sculpture of posterior margin of T1 in female: sparsely longitudinally striate. Transverse sulcus on T2: present. Sculpture of T2-T5: T2-T4 sparsely longitudinally striate, with fine punctures in interstices, T5 densely longitudinally striate punctate. Sculpture of T6 in female: densely punctate. Length of T6 in female: wider than long. Apex of T6 in female: round. Sculpture of S2: longitudinally striate rugose. Sculpture of T1 in male: sparsely longitudinally striate, smooth in interstices. Male T8 apical spine: present.</p><p>Etymology.</p><p>The Malagasy word " soa " means “beautiful” or “excellent” . We apply it to this species because we find it to be both of these. The name is treated as a noun in apposition.</p><p>Link to distribution map.</p><p>[http://hol.osu.edu/map-large.html?id=448556]</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>Holotype, female: MADAGASCAR: Antsiranana Auto. Prov., 5km W Manantenina, Camp Mantella, low altitude rainforest, MA-31-32, 490 m, 14°26.29'S 49°46.44'E, Marojejy National Park, 14. X– 22.X.2005, Malaise trap, M. Irwin &amp; R. Harin’Hala, CASENT 2136859 (deposited in CAS). Paratypes: MADAGASCAR: 3 males, CASENT 2132434-2132435 (OSUC), 2135976 (CAS).</p><p>Comments.</p><p>Habroteleia soa is the most geographically disjunct member of the genus, separated from the other species by the Indian Ocean. Despite this separation, it is not morphologically unusual in comparison with the other species, suggesting either that there is a relatively recent division between H. soa and the other species, that the morphology of the genus evolves rather slowly, or that there has been insufficient sampling in the intervening areas (e.g., east Africa, the moist southern part of the Arabian peninsula, India, and all other intervening regions).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8A0B4EB80FBC1A9ABF605E44659E68E7	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Chen, Hua-yan;Talamas, Elijah J.;Masner, Lubomir;Johnson, Norman F.	Chen, Hua-yan, Talamas, Elijah J., Masner, Lubomir, Johnson, Norman F. (2018): Revision of the world species of the genus Habroteleia Kieffer (Hymenoptera, Platygastridae, Scelioninae). ZooKeys 730: 85-120, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21846, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21846
9A4EDD6011F98546E4D27FD62890257D.text	9A4EDD6011F98546E4D27FD62890257D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Habroteleia spinosa Chen & Johnson	<div><p>Habroteleia spinosa Chen &amp; Johnson sp. n. Figures 4-5, 82-87</p><p>Description .</p><p>Body length of female: 3.51-3.52 mm (n=2). Body length of male: 3.37-3.81 mm (n=6). Length of A3 in male: longer than A2. Punctation of frons above antennal scrobe: dense. Sculpture of antennal scrobe: punctate rugose. Central keel: present. Sculpture of ventrolateral frons: punctate rugose. Occipital carina: interrupted medially. Sculpture of posterior vertex: smooth with sparse punctures. Sculpture of gena: sparsely punctate. Sculpture of occiput: smooth.</p><p>Color of mesosoma: black. Sculpture of dorsal pronotal area: sparsely punctate. Sculpture of lateral pronotal area: largely smooth, with sparsely punctures medially. Sculpture of netrion: coarsely striate ventrally, rugulose dorsally. Setae of netrion: dense throughout. Sculpture of notaulus: discretely punctate. Sculpture of mesoscutal midlobe: densely finely punctate along anterior margin, otherwise smooth. Sculpture of lateral lobe of mesoscutum: smooth. Sculpture of lateral propodeal area: rugose. Setation of mesoscutellum: sparse. Sculpture of mesoscutellum: sparsely punctate. Median propodeal projection: short. Mesopleural carina: distinct. Sculpture of mesepisternum anteroventral to mesopleural depression: smooth. Sculpture of dorsal metapleural area: smooth. Sculpture of ventral metapleural area: rugose. Setation of ventral metapleural area: dense. Color of legs: dark brown to black. Sculpture of hind coxa: smooth.</p><p>Color of metasoma: black. T1 horn in female: absent. Sculpture of posterior margin of T1 in female: densely longitudinally striate, punctate rugulose in interstices. Transverse sulcus on T2: present. Sculpture of T2-T5: densely longitudinally striate, punctate rugulose in interstices. Sculpture of T6 in female: rugose. Length of T6 in female: wider than long. Apex of T6 in female: pointed. Sculpture of S2: sparsely longitudinally striate medially, with fine punctures in interstices, irregularly finely punctate laterally. Sculpture of T1 in male: sparsely longitudinally striate, smooth in interstices. Male T8 apical spine: absent.</p><p>Diagnosis .</p><p>This species is most similar to H. salebra but can be distinguished by the pointed apex of T6 in females and the spine at the apex of T8 in males,</p><p>Etymology.</p><p>The specific epithet means spiny, referring to the pointed apex of T6 in females and should be treated as an adjective.</p><p>Link to distribution map.</p><p>[http://hol.osu.edu/map-large.html?id=448458]</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>Holotype, female: INDONESIA: Papua Prov., W New Guinea Isl., Central Mts., Archbold Lake, 760m, 26. XI– 3.XII.1961, sweeping, L. W . Quate, OSUC 232889 (deposited in BPBM). Paratypes: (1 female, 6 males) INDONESIA: 6 males, OSUC 232878, 232887, 232893, 232929-232930, 234491 (BPBM). PAPUA NEW GUINEA: 1 female, OSUC 232888 (BPBM).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9A4EDD6011F98546E4D27FD62890257D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Chen, Hua-yan;Talamas, Elijah J.;Masner, Lubomir;Johnson, Norman F.	Chen, Hua-yan, Talamas, Elijah J., Masner, Lubomir, Johnson, Norman F. (2018): Revision of the world species of the genus Habroteleia Kieffer (Hymenoptera, Platygastridae, Scelioninae). ZooKeys 730: 85-120, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21846, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21846
