identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03CF652B381DFFA4FF5BBF10FE58A5EC.text	03CF652B381DFFA4FF5BBF10FE58A5EC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ennya Stal 1866	<div><p>Ennya Stål, 1866</p><p>Diagnosis. Head triangular. Pronotum navicular with longitudinal non-reticulate carinae (Fig. 1A–B). Humeral angles triangularly produced (Fig. 1C). Dorsal outline rounded or with a dorsal process elevated above or just behind humeral angles and projected upwards or obliquely forward and upwards. Dorsal process (when present) blunt (Fig. 7B), triangular (Fig. 2B), spine-like (1B) or trapezoidal (Fig. 1A). Forewings in repose partially concealed by pronotum up to Cu vein; veins R, M, and Cu separated up to the middle, five apical cells and usually one discoidal cell smaller than first apical cell (Fig 1B). Hind wing with three apical cells.</p><p>Remarks. The coloration of Ennya species is usually yellowish green, but also varies from brown, orange, yellow, white or black; with black patches or bands, the central carina contrasting black (Figs. 1C–D) or concolorous with the pronotum. Some species present remarkable sexual dimorphism in coloration and shape of dorsal process with females frequently lighter and with a higher dorsal process than males. The shape of the dorsal process is likely the most important character to distinguish species, although the elevation may vary within the same species. Species with a trapezoidal dorsal process present an anterior and posterior vertex (Fig. 1A), and the shape can vary independently of each vertex from rounded to triangular. The orientation (forwards, upwards or backwards) of the dorsal process apex (or anterior vertex in trapezoidal process) may be used to delimit species. Currently, E. colombiana Sakakibara, 1996a is the only known species that lacks a dorsal process. The pronotum reaches nearly to, or slightly beyond, the forewings tips except for E. allkukiru sp. nov., in which the pronotum barely reaches the apex of the third apical cell (Fig. 2B). The metopidium, in frontal view, is usually rounded except for E. lamariela sp. nov. which is sub-quadrate (Fig. 7A).</p><p>Species included (19):</p><p>E. andina Sakakibara, 1996</p><p>E. allkukiru Montalvo-Salazar sp. nov.</p><p>E. bordoni Sakakibara, 1996</p><p>E. chlorizans Breddin, 1902 stat. rev.</p><p>E. chrysura (Faimarie, 1846)</p><p>E. colombiana Sakakibara, 1996</p><p>E. conspersa (Stål, 1869)</p><p>E. conica (Faimarie, 1846)</p><p>E. dorsalis (Faimarie, 1846)</p><p>E. ecuadorensis (Fowler, 1894)</p><p>E. funkhouseri (Goding, 1928) stat. rev.</p><p>E. gibbera (Goding, 1930) reinst. comb.</p><p>E. lamariela Montalvo-Salazar &amp; López-García sp. nov. E. maculicornis (Faimarie, 1846)</p><p>E. notata (Stål, 1869)</p><p>E. nutans (Stål, 1869)</p><p>E. pacifica (Faimarie, 1846)</p><p>E. scaramozzinoi Creão-Duarte &amp; Sakakibara, 1994 E. sobria (Walker, 1851)</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF652B381DFFA4FF5BBF10FE58A5EC	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L.;López-García, Margarita M.	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L., López-García, Margarita M. (2024): Contributions on the treehopper genus Ennya Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Membracidae) with two new species from Ecuador. Zootaxa 5428 (2): 269-289, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6
03CF652B381CFFA0FF5BBAACFAECA474.text	03CF652B381CFFA0FF5BBAACFAECA474.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ennya allkukiru Montalvo-Salazar & López-García 2024	<div><p>Ennya allkukiru Montalvo-Salazar sp. nov.</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 820FB29D-B138-4B6E-B9DF-A7D109780F7D</p><p>(Figs. 2, 3, 10A–B)</p><p>Diagnosis. Pronotum with four lateral carinae on each side; dorsal process triangular acute, vertex directed backwards; posterior process not reaching apex of the third apical cell.</p><p>Description. Male holotype. Measurements (mm): Body length: 6.6; pronotum length 5.8; pronotum height: 2.2; distance between humeral angles: 2.9; head width: 2.3; head height: 9.2. Color. Mostly yellowish. Head yellow mottled with black spots, eyes pale yellow with black margins and discrete black mottles, ocelli pale yellow. Pronotum yellowish to brown; tips of humeral angles and dorsal process darker. Forewing membrane amber with smoky margins; sclerotized area pale brown; forewing veins pale brown to dark brown. Hind wing hyaline, apex smoky hyaline, veins black. Thoracic and abdominal sternites and coxae black. Legs pale yellow.</p><p>Sculpture. Pronotum and sclerotized areas of forewings densely and deeply punctate; head with sparse and small punctations. Head with long recumbent setae, clypeus densely setose; pronotum with short erect setae, central and lateral carinae flanked by long erect setae; sclerotized area of forewings with short, recumbent setae. Pronotum behind humeral angles with four longitudinal carinae on each side; metopidium without lateral carinae; dorsal process with five short vertical carinae. Thoracic and abdominal sternites, and legs densely pubescent.</p><p>Head. In frontal view: width (without eyes) approximately half distance between tips of humeral angles; eye width approximately one quarter vertex width; distance between ocelli subequal to distance between ocelli and eyes; vertex slightly concave at middle; clypeus diamond-shaped with width and height approximately half of vertex dimensions; suprantennal ledges large and straight. In ventral view, clypeus ventrally convex, maxillary plates flattened with straight margins; rostrum reaching posterior margin of metathoracic coxae.</p><p>Thorax. Pronotum in frontal view with metopidium rounded; humeral angles strongly produced and triangular, acute; dorsal process acute, triangular. In lateral view with metopodium convex; pronotum with elevated triangular dorsal process slightly convex anteriorly and slightly concave posteriorly, base wider than height, extended above postocular lobes, dorsal process and posterior process forming obtuse angle; apex of posterior process acute, reaching tip of second apical cell of forewing; central carina sharp and percurrent throughout. In dorsal view diamond shaped, posterior process elongate, lateral margins behind humeral angles weakly sinuous, converging to acute apex. Forewing with five apical cells, third apical cell one fourth length of first apical cell, and one discoidal cell subequal to length of third apical cell. Metathoracic femur longer and more slender than pro- and mesothracic femora. Metathoracic tibia with cucullate setae in all three rows, [row I irregular / II double / III double apically]. Metathoracic tibia longer than pro- and mesothoracic tibiae. First tarsomere of posterior legs longer than that of anterior and middle legs, and with plantar cucullate setae.</p><p>Abdomen. Aedeagus robust, cylindrical; in lateral view with basal margin truncate and dorsal margin deeply emarginate; posterior arm slightly widened toward apex in anterior and caudal view, 1.5 × as tall as anterior arm; corona with margin slightly emarginate, with numerous scale-like spines on anterior and dorsal region of posterior arm. Style curved latero-ventrally, apex recurved, acute.</p><p>Female and nymph unknown.</p><p>Remarks. This is the first known species of the genus Ennya in which the apex of the pronotum does not surpass the apex of the forewing third apical cell. The apex of the pronotum in Ennya usually reaches or slightly surpasses the apex of the forewing. Ennya allkukiru sp. nov. is most similar to E. conica (Fairmaire, 1846) by the triangular acute dorsal process with transversal carinae and the concolorous median carina. However, the pronotum of E. allkukiru sp. nov. does not reach the forewing apex and the posterior margin of the dorsal process is not continuous with the posterior margin of the dorsal process, forming an obtuse angle. E. allkukiru sp. nov. differs from E. sobria (Walker, 1851) and E. dorsalis (Fairmaire, 1846) in having the median carina concolorous rather than black, and from E. scaramozzinoi Creão-Duarte &amp; Sakakibara, 1994 in having the apex of the dorsal process not directed upwards but backwards. The acute triangular dorsal process of E. allkukiru sp. nov. differs from those of E. andina (Sakakibara,1996a), E. conspersa, E. pacifica (Fairmaire, 1846), E. bordoni Sakakibara 1996a, E. notata, E. nutans, E. lamariela sp. nov., E. ecuadoriensis, E. gibbera reinst. comb., and E. maculicornis (Fairmaire, 1846) in being distinctly acute rather than blunt.</p><p>Distribution. Cordillera Oriental of the Ecuadorian Andes at 2,700 m elevation (Fig. 10A).</p><p>Material examined. Holotype female from ECUADOR: Tungurahua: Píllaro, Baquerizo Moreno:“ECUADOR, Tunguragua / Pillaro 2700m / Lat: -1.226222: Lon: -78.47481 / Montalvo, J. 01May2022 / Ex. Manual // Ennya allkukiru / Montalvo, J. / HOLOTYPE (in red label) // ZSFQ-i8212”.</p><p>Notes. Holotype minuten-mounted, with dissected abdomen placed in a vial with glycerin pinned with the specimen. The head and pronotum were accidentally separated from the body during genitalia dissection, then glued together using Shellac Gel.</p><p>Natural history. Ennya allkukiru sp. nov. inhabits the remnants of Oriental Montane Forest of the North Andes, in a zone fragmented by livestock pastures (Fig. 9B). The specimen was found solitary perched on the branch of an undetermined plant 170 cm above the ground. Species of Ennya are subsocial (Godoy et al. 2006) but solitary adults can be found on a variety of plants, perhaps searching for acceptable hosts.</p><p>Etymology. The specific epithet is a noun formed by two terms from Kichwa, an official language, together with Spanish, of Ecuador spoken by several nationalities in the highlands and Amazonia, allku “dog” and kiru “tooth”, referring to the shape of the dorsal process of pronotum, which resembles a dog’s canine tooth.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF652B381CFFA0FF5BBAACFAECA474	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L.;López-García, Margarita M.	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L., López-García, Margarita M. (2024): Contributions on the treehopper genus Ennya Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Membracidae) with two new species from Ecuador. Zootaxa 5428 (2): 269-289, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6
03CF652B3818FFAEFF5BBEA0FD0AA26E.text	03CF652B3818FFAEFF5BBEA0FD0AA26E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ennya chlorizans Breddin 1902	<div><p>Ennya chlorizans Breddin, 1902 stat. rev. (Figs. 4, 10A)</p><p>Ennya chlorizans Breddin, 1902: 177 (Figs. 4A–C)</p><p>Gelastogonia clorizans Breddin — Funkhouser (1951: 121)</p><p>Ennya chrysura Fairmaire Equals Ennya clorizans Breddin — Metcalf &amp; Wade (1965: 1023)</p><p>Ennya rufomaculata Fallou Equals Ennya chlorisans [sic] Breddin— Sakakibara (1996a: 95)</p><p>Ennya nebulosa Breddin, 1902: 177 syn. nov. (Figs. 4D–E)</p><p>Gelastogonia nebulosa Breddin — Funkhouser (1951: 121)</p><p>Ennya chrysura Fairmaire Equals Ennya nebulosa Breddin — Metcalf &amp; Wade (1965: 1023)</p><p>Ennya rufomaculata Fallou Equals Ennya nebulosa Breddin — Sakakibara (1996a: 95)</p><p>Material examined: Lectotype (photograph) female Ennya chlorizans from ECUADOR: Baños, DEI Hemimetabola #100328 (SDEI) . Holotype (photography) male Ennya nebulosa from ECUADOR: Baños, DEI Hemimetabola # 100327 (SDEI) . Additional material: One female (ZSFQ-i12392) and one male (ZSFQ-i12393) from ECUADOR: Napo: Guango Lodge (ZSFQ) .</p><p>Comments: Ennya chlorizans and E. nebulosa were transferred to Gelastogonia Kirkaldy 1904 by Funkhouser (1951), and then both were synonymized under E. chrysura by Metcalf &amp; Wade (1965). More recently, Sakakibara (1996a) considered E. chlorizans and E. nebulosa as junior synonyms of E. rufomaculata but the latter does not belong to the genus Ennya (see below). Ennya chlorizans and E. nebulosa do not belong to Gelastogonia because they lack reticulated pronotal carinae (Sakakibara, 1996a).</p><p>Ennya chlorizans and E. nebulosa are the same species, their primary types representing opposite genders, which may explain the color variation and the small differences in pronotal shape. Such sexual dimorphism has been observed in additional material examined. Moreover, both type specimens were collected in the same location and Ennya chlorizans and E. nebulosa were described in the same manuscript. Following the principle of the first revisor (International Code of Zoological Nomenlature Art. 24.2), we select E. chlorizans to have precedence.</p><p>Ennya chlorizans is easily recognizable by the pronotum having the dorsal process trapezoidal, longer than high, with the anterior margin concave with an acute triangular vertex slightly directed backwards, and the posterior margin rounded. It is most similar to E. chrysura but can be distinguished by the uniformly concave anterior margin of the dorsal process which is also not as elevated.</p><p>This species is sexually dimorphic in coloration and the shape of the pronotum. Females are mainly yellow with a discontinuous black band and black spots while males are predominantly black. The anterior margin of the dorsal process in females is more concave than in males.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF652B3818FFAEFF5BBEA0FD0AA26E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L.;López-García, Margarita M.	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L., López-García, Margarita M. (2024): Contributions on the treehopper genus Ennya Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Membracidae) with two new species from Ecuador. Zootaxa 5428 (2): 269-289, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6
03CF652B3817FFAEFF5BBFA4FB89A1DE.text	03CF652B3817FFAEFF5BBFA4FB89A1DE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ennya chrysura (Fairmaire 1846)	<div><p>Ennya chrysura (Fairmaire, 1846) (Fig. 1A, 10A)</p><p>Material examined: Lectotype female (DEI Hemimetabola # 100325) and paralectotype female (DEI Hemimetabola # 100326) Ennya fairmairei Breddin (SDEI) . Additional material: three females and one male (ZSFQ-i8143) from ECUADOR: Pichincha: La Hesperia; two females and two males (ZSFQ-i17988:17991) from ECUADOR: Zamora Chinchipe: Cumunidad Río Blanco .</p><p>Comments: Ennya chrysura resambles E. chlorizans in the shape of the dorsal projection (see comments above). Males of this species differ from females in pronotal coloration, being mostly black and posteriorly yellow while females are anteriorly and posteriorly yellow. This species is the most widespread in the genus, being recorded from Mexico, Panama, Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru (McKamey 1998).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF652B3817FFAEFF5BBFA4FB89A1DE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L.;López-García, Margarita M.	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L., López-García, Margarita M. (2024): Contributions on the treehopper genus Ennya Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Membracidae) with two new species from Ecuador. Zootaxa 5428 (2): 269-289, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6
03CF652B3817FFAEFF5BBD74FB89A5E8.text	03CF652B3817FFAEFF5BBD74FB89A5E8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ennya conspersa (Stal 1869)	<div><p>Ennya conspersa (Stål, 1869) (Figs. 5A–C)</p><p>Hille conspersa Stål, 1869: 236</p><p>Hille conspersa Stål To Hille dorsalis Fairmaire — Funkhouser (1927: 317)</p><p>Gelastogonia conspersa Stål — Goding (1929: 282)</p><p>Hille conspersa Stål To Hille dorsalis Fairmaire — Funkhouser (1951: 120)</p><p>Ennya conspersa Stål — Sakakibara (1996a: 96)</p><p>Material examined: Lectotype male (NHRS) Hille conspersa: “ Bogota // Lindig // Hille / conspersa / Stål // Typus [print red label] // NHRS-GULI / 000105270” here designated. Twelve paralectotypes (NHRS): “Bogota // Lindig // Paratypus [print red label] // NHRS-GULI / 000105288” and NHRS-GULI000105289: GULI000105299 with same labels.</p><p>Comments: Ennya conspersa was synonymized with E. dorsalis by Funkhouser (1927) but later revalidated by Sakakibara (1996a). Ennya conspersa differs from E. dorsalis in having a blunt dorsal process with the central carina concolorous to the pronotum, compared to acute and contrastingly black, respectively, in the latter.</p><p>The pronotal shape of E. conspersa resembles that of E. notata (Figs. 4D–E) and the coloration is the only remarkable difference. The pattern of coloration in both species seems to be conserved in the paralectotypes. Stål (1869) agreed they are very similar and only differ in the coloration and the dorsal process of E. notata Stål being inclined slightly forward compared to sub-perpendicular in E. conspersa Stål. However, this last difference is not very distinctive. According to the specimen labels, the type locality of both species is “ Bogotá ” but in the 19th century that city served as a place for shipping specimens to Europe, so it is unknown if the specimens were collected at the same place (Forero 2006). Further study of additional type material and other specimens of these species is needed to clarify their status.</p><p>Sakakibara (1996a: Figs. 7 and 8) examined two specimens of opposite genders that he identified as E. conspersa . However, they differ distinctly from the type of E. conspersa in lacking a dorsal process and likely represent a species not yet described. Those individuals are clearly different from E. conspersa .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF652B3817FFAEFF5BBD74FB89A5E8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L.;López-García, Margarita M.	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L., López-García, Margarita M. (2024): Contributions on the treehopper genus Ennya Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Membracidae) with two new species from Ecuador. Zootaxa 5428 (2): 269-289, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6
03CF652B3816FFACFF5BB962FC8AA152.text	03CF652B3816FFACFF5BB962FC8AA152.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ennya ecuadorensis (Fowler 1894)	<div><p>Ennya ecuadorensis (Fowler, 1894) (Figs. 6A–C)</p><p>Hille ecuadorensis</p><p>Gelastogonia ecuadorensis Fowler To Gelastogonia pacifica Fairmaire — Goding (1929: 283)</p><p>Hille ecuadorensis Fowler — Funkhouser (1951: 120)</p><p>Hille ecuadorensis Fowler To Hille pacifica Fairmaire — Metcalf &amp; Wade (1965: 1027)</p><p>Ennya ecuadorensis Fowler — Sakakibara (1996a: 96)</p><p>Material examined: Lectotype (NHMW) Hille ecuadorensis: “ Ecuador / Coll. Signoret. // ecuadorensis / det. Fowler. // Hille ecuadorensis / Fowler. Type. // SYNTYPE [print red label] / Hille ecuadorensis / Fowler, 1894 / O.Evangelista det. 2017” here designated. One paralectotype (NHMW): “ Ecuador / Coll. Signoret. // ecuadorensis / det. Fowler. // SYNTYPE [print red label] / Hille ecuadorensis / Fowler, 1894 / O. Evangelista det. 2017”.</p><p>Comments: Ennya ecuadorensis was considered synonym of E. pacifica by Goding (1929) and Metcalf &amp; Wade (1965). Sakakibara (1996a) revalidated the species, arguing that the type localities of both are too distant from each other for them to be considered the same species. The specimen that Sakakibara (1996a) illustrated and identified as E. ecuadorensis likely is misidentified due to the differences in the shape of the dorsal process, which is larger and inclined forwards in Sakakibara’s specimen.</p><p>Ennya ecuadorensis resembles E. conspersa but differs in the uniform fuscous coloration, thinner dorsal process, slightly more produced humeral angles and amber forewings.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF652B3816FFACFF5BB962FC8AA152	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L.;López-García, Margarita M.	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L., López-García, Margarita M. (2024): Contributions on the treehopper genus Ennya Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Membracidae) with two new species from Ecuador. Zootaxa 5428 (2): 269-289, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6
03CF652B3815FFACFF5BBCE7FD08A7A5.text	03CF652B3815FFACFF5BBCE7FD08A7A5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ennya funkhouseri (Goding 1928) Montalvo-Salazar & López-García 2024	<div><p>Ennya funkhouseri (Goding, 1928) stat. rev. (Figs. 6H–I, 10A)</p><p>Gelastogonia funkhouseri Goding, 1928: 138</p><p>Ennya funkhouseri Goding — Metcalf &amp; Wade (1965: 1026)</p><p>Ennya rufomaculata Fallou Equals Ennya funkhouseri Goding — Sakakibara (1996a: 95)</p><p>Material examined: Syntype (photograph) male Gelastogonia funkhouseri from ECUADOR: Huigra (USNM) .</p><p>Comments: Sakakibara (1996a) considered Ennya funkhouseri as the junior synonym of E. rufomaculata but the latter does not belong to the genus Ennya (see below). Ennya funkhouseri cannot be placed in Gelastogonia because the pronotum lacks reticulate carinae and the dorsal process is not foliaceous (Sakakibara 1996a).</p><p>Ennya funkhouseri differs from its congeners in having the dorsal process trapezoidal and longer than high with the anterior and posterior vertex rounded. This species is similar to E. chlorizans stat. rev. but the anterior vertex is not acute and not higher than the posterior vertex.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF652B3815FFACFF5BBCE7FD08A7A5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L.;López-García, Margarita M.	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L., López-García, Margarita M. (2024): Contributions on the treehopper genus Ennya Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Membracidae) with two new species from Ecuador. Zootaxa 5428 (2): 269-289, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6
03CF652B3815FFACFF5BBAEBFDC5A5F1.text	03CF652B3815FFACFF5BBAEBFDC5A5F1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ennya gibbera (Goding 1930)	<div><p>Ennya gibbera (Goding, 1930) reinst. comb. (Figs. 6D–F)</p><p>Gelastogonia gibbera</p><p>Ennya gibbera Goding — Metcalf &amp; Wade (1965: 1026)</p><p>Gelastogonia gibbera Goding — Sakakibara (1996a: 101)</p><p>Material examined: Holotype (photograph) female of Gelastogonia gibbera from ECUADOR, AMNH_IZC 00343445 (AMNH).</p><p>Comments: Ennya gibbera was originally described in the genus Gelastogonia, transferred to Ennya by Metcalf &amp; Wade (1965) and back to Gelastogonia by Sakakibara (1996a). This species belongs to Ennya based on the navicular pronotum shape and the simple longitudinal carinae (Sakakibara 1996a). The exact type locality is unknown.</p><p>Ennya gibbera resembles E. andina and E. pacifica in having a triangular blunt dorsal process elevated above the humeral angles. However, the anterior margin of the dorsal process of E. gibbera is sub-perpendicular and exhibits a different color pattern.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF652B3815FFACFF5BBAEBFDC5A5F1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L.;López-García, Margarita M.	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L., López-García, Margarita M. (2024): Contributions on the treehopper genus Ennya Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Membracidae) with two new species from Ecuador. Zootaxa 5428 (2): 269-289, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6
03CF652B3814FFA8FF5BBB51FE60A61E.text	03CF652B3814FFA8FF5BBB51FE60A61E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ennya lamariela Montalvo-Salazar & Lopez-Garcia 2024	<div><p>Ennya lamariela Montalvo-Salazar &amp; López-García sp. nov.</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: A0BBDFFF-6A5A-42EF-BE3A-81AC53945EDB</p><p>(Figs. 7, 8, 10A, C–D)</p><p>Diagnosis. Metopidium in frontal view sub-quadrate; pronotum with three lateral carinae; dorsal process low and blunt, then sinuous but not produced and finally descending gradually to apex.</p><p>Description. Holotype male. Measurements (mm): Body length: 5.6; pronotum length 5.6; pronotum height: 1.8; distance between humeral angles: 2.8; head width: 2.2; head height: 9.4. Color. Mostly fuscous green. Head brown, eyes gray mottled with black spots, ocelli pale yellow. Pronotum pale green with brown spots; metopidium fuscous; humeral angles, dorsal process and posterior apex darker. Forewing membrane smoky with a black apical patch; sclerotized area brown; forewing veins brown to black. Hind wings hyaline, apex smoky hyaline, veins black. Thoracic and abdominal sternites, and legs pale yellow.</p><p>Sculpture. Head, pronotum, thoracic sternites and sclerotized areas of forewings densely and deeply punctate, and with sparse short setae, central carinae flanked by long erect setae. Pronotum reticulate with three longitudinal lateral carinae reaching the apex; metopidium with two lateral carinae; dorsal process with trasnversal carinae. Abdominal sternites and legs with dense pubescence.</p><p>Head. In frontal view: width (without eyes) approximately half of distance between tips of humeral angles; eye width approximately half vertex width; ocelli closer to coronal suture than to eyes; vertex slightly sinuated; clypeus diamond shaped with width approximately half vertex width; suprantennal ledges large and slightly concave. In ventral view clypeus ventrally convex, maxillary plates flattened with sinuate margins; rostrum reaching posterior margin of metathoracic coxae.</p><p>Thorax. Pronotum in frontal view with metopidium sub-quadrate, humeral angles blunt triangular produced; dorsal process triangular. In lateral view with metopodium convex; pronotum with low blunt dorsal process, base wider than height, emerging just behind humeral angles and directed upwards, then sinuate and finally descending gradually to acute apex, reaching tips of forewings; central carina sharp and percurrent throughout. In dorsal view diamond-shaped, posterior process elongate, lateral margins posterior to humeral angles weakly sinuous, converging to an acute apex. Forewings with five apical cells, third apical cell one fifth as long as first apical cell, one discoidal cell half length of first apical cell. Metathoracic femur longer and more slender than pro- and mesothoracic femora. Metathoracic tibia with cucullate setae in all three rows [row I irregular / II double / III double apically]. Metathoracic tibia longer than pro- and mesothoracic tibiae. First tarsomere of posterior legs longer than those of anterior and middle legs, with plantar cucullate setae ventrally.</p><p>Abdomen. Aedeagus robust, cylindrical; in lateral view with basal margin truncate and dorsal margin deeply emarginate; posterior arm slightly narrowed toward apex in anterior and caudal view, 2 x as tall as anterior arm; corona with margin rounded, with numerous scale-like dentae on anterior and dorsal region of posterior arm. Styles curved ventrolaterally, apically recurved, tips rounded.</p><p>Variation. Measurements. Male / Female (mm): Body length: 5.4–5.7/ 5.7–6,0; pronotum length 54–5.7 / 5.7– 6.0; pronotum height: 1.5–1.8 / 1.7–2.0; distance between humeral angles: 2.5–2.6 / 2.7–2.8; head width: 2.1–2.3 / 2.3–2.4; head height: 1.0 / 0.9–1.2. Females tend to be paler than males, mostly yellow-green, and some females pale are pink on the base of the metopidium and head. In some paratypes, the metopidium and anterior area of the dorsal process or just the dorsal process is darker than the rest of the pronotum. One male paratype is completely black mottled with brown spots. Transverse carinae may be absent or more than one. The pattern of the carinae of the dorsal process is different in each individual.</p><p>Female genitalia. Gonoplac with setae along ventral margin. First valvulae gradually narrowing toward a sharp apex. Second valvulae with parallel margins until the apical third where dorsal margin is abruptly widened; apex ending in a rounded point; dorsal margin minutely crenulate at apex.</p><p>Fifth-instar nymph description. Color. Body mostly brown greenish to black, head with two longitudinal darker stripes, pronotum with central carinae black. Overall body. Dense chalazal setae simple, needlelike; dorsal contour of abdomen in lateral view straight to slightly convex. A pair of small protuberances close to the posterior margin of head. Prothorax. Pre- and postmetopidum without scoli; pronotum with a short blunt dorsal process; posterior extension of pronotum surpassing posterior margin of metanotum, reaching to second segment of abdomen; in lateral view: metopidium concave, then straight and finally descending to posterior apex, pronotum trapezoidal; in dorsal view posterior process subtriangular, apex acute. Mesothorax. Scoli absent; forewing pad costal margin slightly concave; forewing pad chalazae sparse. Metathorax. Scoli absent. Legs. Chalazae on all surface of tibiae with enlarged chalazae on apex. Abdomen. Without scoli; chalazae subequal on all segments, lateral rows of enlarged chalazae absent; segment IX dorsal and ventral lengths equal.</p><p>Remarks. This is the first known species of the genus Ennya in which the shape of the metopidium in frontal view is sub-quadrate; the other species exhibit a rounded shape. Ennya lamariela sp. nov. is most similar to E. andina with the triangular dorsal process being short, blunt and directed upwards. However, the pronotum of E. lamariela sp. nov. has a second elevation not produced next to the dorsal process while, in E. andina, after the dorsal process the pronotum descends gradually to the apex. Ennya lamariela sp. nov. differs from E. pacifica, E. bordoni, E. notata, E. nutans, and E. gibbera reinst. comb. in having the anterior margin of the dorsal process not sub-perpendicular but oblique. The triangular dorsal process directed upwards in E. lamariela sp. nov. separates it from E. ecuadoriensis, E. conspersa, and E. maculicornis, which all have a dorsal process that is directed forward. The blunt dorsal process of E. lamariela sp. nov. distinguishes it from E. sobria, E. conica, E. dorsalis, E. scaramozzinoi, and E. allkukiru sp. nov., which all have an acute dorsal process. Lastly, E. lamariela sp. nov. differs from E. colombiana by the presence of a dorsal process, and from E. chrysura, E. funkhouseri, and E. chlorizans in having the dorsal process triangular instead of trapezoidal.</p><p>Distribution. Western foothills of the Ecuadorian Andes at 875 m (Fig. 9A).</p><p>Material examined. Holotype male from ECUADOR: Cotopaxi: Moraspungo, La Mariela. “ECUADOR, Cotopaxi / Moraspungo 875m / Lat: -1.0866111; Lon: -79.1893888 / Montalvo, J. &amp; López-García, M.M. 26Feb2023 / Ex. Manual // Ennya lamariela / Montalvo, J. &amp; López-García, M.M. / HOLOTYPE (in red label) // ZSFQ-i11333” . Paratypes. Seven females ZSFQ-i11333:11340 and three males ZSFQ-i11341:11343 with the same data as holotype . Additional material. Six nymphs at different stages with the same data as holotype ZSFQi11344:11349.</p><p>Notes. Holotype and paratypes minuten-mounted, in excellent state of preservation. Holotype and one female paratype with dissected abdomens placed in vials with glycerol pinned with specimens.</p><p>Natural history. Ennya lamariela sp. nov. inhabits the remnants of the mature forest of Occidental Foothill Forest of Northern Andes, in a zone extremely fragmented by banana ( Musa × paradisiaca L.) monoculture and livestock (Figs. 9C–D). Adult specimens and nymphs at different stages were found in an aggregation on the low branches at 150 cm above the ground of an undetermined species of Caesalpinioideae D.C. ( Fabaceae). However, egg masses or scars were not found. The proportion of nymphs was higher than adults, as was females over males.</p><p>Species of the genus Ennya in the Andes are usually found around 2,000 m (Flórez-V et al. 2015), so this record is one of the lowest known altitudes.</p><p>Etymology. This species is named after its type locality, La Mariela, a fragment of Western foothill forest in Moraspungo (Cotopaxi).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF652B3814FFA8FF5BBB51FE60A61E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L.;López-García, Margarita M.	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L., López-García, Margarita M. (2024): Contributions on the treehopper genus Ennya Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Membracidae) with two new species from Ecuador. Zootaxa 5428 (2): 269-289, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6
03CF652B3811FFA8FF5BBB4CFED4A4D5.text	03CF652B3811FFA8FF5BBB4CFED4A4D5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ennya notata (Stal 1869)	<div><p>Ennya notata (Stål, 1869) (Figs. 5D–F)</p><p>Hille notata Stål (1869): 235</p><p>Hille notata Stål To Hille dorsalis Fairmaire — Funkhouser (1927: 317)</p><p>Gelastogonia notata Stål Equals Gelastogonia acuminata [sic] Buckton — Goding (1929: 283)</p><p>Hille notata Stål To Hille dorsalis Fairmaire — Funkhouser (1951: 120)</p><p>Ennya notata Stål —Metcal &amp; Wade (1965: 1026)</p><p>Material examined: Lectotype female (NHRS) Hille notata: “ Bogota // Lindig // Hille / notata / Stål // Typus [print red label] // NHRS-GULI / 000105269” here designated. Eleven paralectotypes (NHRS): “Bogota // Lindig // Paratypus [print red label] // NHRS-GULI / 000105277” and NHRS-GULI000105278: GULI000105287 with same labels.</p><p>Comments: Ennya notata was synonymized with E. dorsalis by Funkhouser (1927, 1951), Goding (1929), transferred to the genus Gelastogonia and included Oxygonia accuminata Buckton, 1903 as junior synonym, and lastly the species status was revalidated by Sakakibara (1996a) and transferred O. accuminata to synonymy under E. conica . The type locality is ambiguous (see comments under E. conspersa).</p><p>Ennya notata differs from E. dorsalis in having a blunt dorsal process and the central carina concolorous to the pronotum instead of acute and black respectively. It closely resembles E. conspersa (check the comments of E. conspersa).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF652B3811FFA8FF5BBB4CFED4A4D5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L.;López-García, Margarita M.	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L., López-García, Margarita M. (2024): Contributions on the treehopper genus Ennya Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Membracidae) with two new species from Ecuador. Zootaxa 5428 (2): 269-289, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6
03CF652B3810FFA9FF5BBEA0FBFDA180.text	03CF652B3810FFA9FF5BBEA0FBFDA180.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ennya nutans (Stal 1869)	<div><p>Ennya nutans (Stål, 1869) (Figs. 5G–I)</p><p>Hille nutans Stål (1869): 236</p><p>Hille nutans Stål To Hille conica Faimaire — Funkhouser (1927: 317)</p><p>Gelastogonia nutans Stål — Goding (1929: 283)</p><p>Hille nutans Stål To Hille conica Faimaire — Funkhouser (1951: 120)</p><p>Ennya nutans Stål — Metcalf &amp; Wade (1965: 1027)</p><p>Material examined: Lectotype female (NHRS) Hille nutans: “ Bogota // Lindig // Hille / nutans / Stål // Typus [print red label] // NHRS-GULI / 000105268” here designated. Four paralectotypes (NHRS): “Bogota // Lindig // Paratypus [print red label] // NHRS-GULI / 000105273” and NHRS-GULI000105274: GULI000105276 with same labels.</p><p>Comments: Ennya nutans was considered a synonym of E. conica by Funkhouser (1927, 1951). However, this species is significantly different: E. nutans has a blunt dorsal process directed forward while the dorsal process of E. conica is acute and directed upward. Ennya nutans resembles E. maculicornis in having an oblique dorsal process, but that process is considerably more slender in E. maculicornis than in E. nutans .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF652B3810FFA9FF5BBEA0FBFDA180	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L.;López-García, Margarita M.	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L., López-García, Margarita M. (2024): Contributions on the treehopper genus Ennya Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Membracidae) with two new species from Ecuador. Zootaxa 5428 (2): 269-289, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6
03CF652B3810FFA9FF5BBB02FF31A50D.text	03CF652B3810FFA9FF5BBB02FF31A50D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ennya scaramozzinoi Creao-Duarte & Sakakibara 1994	<div><p>Ennya scaramozzinoi Creão-Duarte &amp; Sakakibara, 1994 (Figs. 1B, 10A)</p><p>Material examined: Two females (ZSFQ-i8140: 8141) from ECUADOR: Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas: Bosque Protector Río Guajalito; one female (ZSFQ-i8231) from ECUADOR: Pichincha: Nono (ZSFQ) .</p><p>Comments: Ennya scaramozzinoi is easly recognozible by pronotum pattern of coloration and spine-like dorsal process. The coloration varies from orange, yellow to white, always with black patches. This species is endemic to Ecuador.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF652B3810FFA9FF5BBB02FF31A50D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L.;López-García, Margarita M.	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L., López-García, Margarita M. (2024): Contributions on the treehopper genus Ennya Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Membracidae) with two new species from Ecuador. Zootaxa 5428 (2): 269-289, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6
03CF652B3810FFA9FF5BBCCEFDD0A7CD.text	03CF652B3810FFA9FF5BBCCEFDD0A7CD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ennya sobria (Walker 1851)	<div><p>Ennya sobria (Walker, 1851) (Figs. 1C–D, 10A)</p><p>Material examined: Holotype female (DEI Hemimetabola # 100324) Hille limbispina Breddin (SDEI) . Additional material: Two females (ZSFQ-i11661:11662) and one male (ZSFQ-i12390) from ECUADOR: Napo: Papallacta, Guango Lodge .</p><p>Comments: Ennya sobria differs from all its congeners except for E. dorsalis in having a spine-like dorsal process, orange coloration and black central carina. Ennya sobria was considered a synonym of Ennya dorsalis for a long time until Sakakibara (1996a) reviewed the types and revalidated the species; however, he did not provide any comments. Also, we could not find differences in the original description of E. dorsalis (Fairmaire, 1846) .</p><p>The localities reported for this species, including the type locality “Quito”, are not precise (Goding 1929). However, this species definitively is not found in Quito and we suggest somewhere around Papallacta could be the type locality due to its proximity to Quito (~ 50 km east). Also it has been reported from Colombia (McKamey 1998). This species is subsocial, with adults and nymphs at different stages found together, in groups of ten to 20 individuals on the same host plant.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF652B3810FFA9FF5BBCCEFDD0A7CD	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L.;López-García, Margarita M.	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L., López-García, Margarita M. (2024): Contributions on the treehopper genus Ennya Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Membracidae) with two new species from Ecuador. Zootaxa 5428 (2): 269-289, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6
03CF652B3810FFB6FF5BB85BFE59A3D6.text	03CF652B3810FFB6FF5BB85BFE59A3D6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Creonus fasciata (Fallou 1890) Montalvo-Salazar & López-García 2024	<div><p>Creonus fasciata (Fallou, 1890) comb. nov. (Figs. 9A–C)</p><p>Oxygonia fasciata Fallou (1890): 353</p><p>Gelastogonia fasciata Fallou — Funkhouser (1927: 315)</p><p>Gelastogonia pacifica Fairmaire Equals Gelastogonia fasciata Fallou — Goding (1929: 282)</p><p>Gelastogonia fasciata Fallou — Funkhouser (1951: 121)</p><p>Ennya fasciata — Sakakibara (1996a: 97)</p><p>Material examined: Syntype (photography) of Oxygonia fasciata from ECUADOR, MNHN(EH) 23768 (MNHN) .</p><p>Comments: Sakakibara (1996a) considered that C. fasciata belonged to the genus Ennya, but the complete absence of a dorsal process and the postocular lobe being sub-quadrate places it into the genus Creonus .</p><p>This species is closely similar to Creonus lloydi (Funkhouser, 1914), with some discrete differences that possibly represent intraspecific variation but probably not. A revision of Creonus is needed, because there are other species (Flórez-V et al. 2015).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF652B3810FFB6FF5BB85BFE59A3D6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L.;López-García, Margarita M.	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L., López-García, Margarita M. (2024): Contributions on the treehopper genus Ennya Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Membracidae) with two new species from Ecuador. Zootaxa 5428 (2): 269-289, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6
03CF652B380FFFB6FF5BBF7DFEF7A5D6.text	03CF652B380FFFB6FF5BBF7DFEF7A5D6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Centronodus gounellei (Fallou 1890) Montalvo-Salazar & López-García 2024	<div><p>Centronodus gounellei (Fallou, 1890) comb. nov. (Figs. 9D–F)</p><p>Heliria gounellei Fallou 1890: 354</p><p>Telamona gounellei Fallou — Funkhouser (1927: 253)</p><p>Gelastogonia gournellei [sic] Fallou— Goding (1929: 282)</p><p>Ennya gounellei — Metcalf &amp; Wade (1965: 1026) Material examined: Syntype (photography) of Heliria gounellei from BRAZIL: Bahia, MNHN(EH) 23780 (MNHN).</p><p>Comments: This species was formerly described in the genus Heliria Stål, 1867 and then transferred to Telamona Fitch, 1851 (Funkhouser 1927). Later, Goding moved it to Gelastogonia (1929) and lastly it was referred to Ennya by Metcalf &amp; Wade (1965). It does not belong to the genus Ennya based on the pronotum not concealing the forewings and the absence of carination. Instead, it presents the diagnostic characteristics of the subfamily Centronodinae Deitz, 1975 based the scutellum being concealed medially and forewing vein M with more than three branches reaching the margin (Dietrich et al. 2001). However, the species does not have reticulate venation which is frequently present in Centronodinae . It is placed in the genus Centronodus Funkhouser, 1930 based on the produced suprahumeral angles (Barreira &amp; Sakakibara 2001).</p><p>Metcalf &amp; Wade (1965) only reported the species from Brazil, although Funkhouser (1951) also reported it from Ecuador.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF652B380FFFB6FF5BBF7DFEF7A5D6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L.;López-García, Margarita M.	Montalvo-Salazar, Jorge L., López-García, Margarita M. (2024): Contributions on the treehopper genus Ennya Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Membracidae) with two new species from Ecuador. Zootaxa 5428 (2): 269-289, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.6
