taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03CD566AF577A116FEB27535FC91296A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5238885/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5238885	Figure 1. Holotypic tarsometatarsus of Oraristrix brea (LACM RLB E9379) in (A) anterior, (B) lateral, (C) posterior, (D) medial, (E) proximal, and (F) distal views. Lateral view (G) of distal tarsometatarsus of O. brea (LACM RLB K9623) illustrates the straight posterior edge of the lateral condyle of Trochlea III. Scale bar = 20 mm.	Figure 1. Holotypic tarsometatarsus of Oraristrix brea (LACM RLB E9379) in (A) anterior, (B) lateral, (C) posterior, (D) medial, (E) proximal, and (F) distal views. Lateral view (G) of distal tarsometatarsus of O. brea (LACM RLB K9623) illustrates the straight posterior edge of the lateral condyle of Trochlea III. Scale bar = 20 mm.	2010-05-26	Campbell, Kenneth E.;Bocheński, Zbigniew M.		Zenodo	biologists	Campbell, Kenneth E.;Bocheński, Zbigniew M.			
03CD566AF577A11AFEF67258FDB52A04.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5238885/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5238885	Figure 1. Holotypic tarsometatarsus of Oraristrix brea (LACM RLB E9379) in (A) anterior, (B) lateral, (C) posterior, (D) medial, (E) proximal, and (F) distal views. Lateral view (G) of distal tarsometatarsus of O. brea (LACM RLB K9623) illustrates the straight posterior edge of the lateral condyle of Trochlea III. Scale bar = 20 mm.	Figure 1. Holotypic tarsometatarsus of Oraristrix brea (LACM RLB E9379) in (A) anterior, (B) lateral, (C) posterior, (D) medial, (E) proximal, and (F) distal views. Lateral view (G) of distal tarsometatarsus of O. brea (LACM RLB K9623) illustrates the straight posterior edge of the lateral condyle of Trochlea III. Scale bar = 20 mm.	2010-05-26	Campbell, Kenneth E.;Bocheński, Zbigniew M.		Zenodo	biologists	Campbell, Kenneth E.;Bocheński, Zbigniew M.			
03CD566AF577A11AFEF67258FDB52A04.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5238891/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5238891	Figure 4. Rostrum maxillare of Oraristrix brea (LACM RLB K2713) in (A) lateral, (B) ventral, and (C) posterior views. Sternum of O. brea (LACM RLB F2477) in (D) anterior, (E) ventral, and (F) lateral view. Scapula, left, of O. brea (LACM RLB H6613), in (G) dorsolateral, (H) dorsomedial, and (I) ventromedial views. Close-up of glenoid facet of (J) O. brea (LACM RLB H6613), (K) Bubo virginianus (LACM 109120), and (L) Strix nebulosa (MVZ 151874) illustrating the consistent differences in the shape of this facet among the species. Coracoid, right, of O. brea (LACM RLB F9687), in (M) ventral, (N) dorsal, and (O) medial view. Sternal ends of (P) B. virginianus (LACM 109120), and (Q) S. nebulosa (MVZ 155426) illustrate the differences in their Angulus medialis. The differing placement of the Linea intermusculare and the size of the Fac. artic. sternalis can also be noted. Clavicula, left, of O. brea (LACM RLB E9233), in (R) lateral view. Scale bar = 20 mm.	Figure 4. Rostrum maxillare of Oraristrix brea (LACM RLB K2713) in (A) lateral, (B) ventral, and (C) posterior views. Sternum of O. brea (LACM RLB F2477) in (D) anterior, (E) ventral, and (F) lateral view. Scapula, left, of O. brea (LACM RLB H6613), in (G) dorsolateral, (H) dorsomedial, and (I) ventromedial views. Close-up of glenoid facet of (J) O. brea (LACM RLB H6613), (K) Bubo virginianus (LACM 109120), and (L) Strix nebulosa (MVZ 151874) illustrating the consistent differences in the shape of this facet among the species. Coracoid, right, of O. brea (LACM RLB F9687), in (M) ventral, (N) dorsal, and (O) medial view. Sternal ends of (P) B. virginianus (LACM 109120), and (Q) S. nebulosa (MVZ 155426) illustrate the differences in their Angulus medialis. The differing placement of the Linea intermusculare and the size of the Fac. artic. sternalis can also be noted. Clavicula, left, of O. brea (LACM RLB E9233), in (R) lateral view. Scale bar = 20 mm.	2010-05-26	Campbell, Kenneth E.;Bocheński, Zbigniew M.		Zenodo	biologists	Campbell, Kenneth E.;Bocheński, Zbigniew M.			
03CD566AF577A11AFEF67258FDB52A04.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5238894/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5238894	Figure 5. Humerus, right, of Oraristrix brea (LACM RLB E9804), in (A) anterior and (B) posterior view, and (C) proximal end in anteroproximal view.Anteroproximal view of proximal ends of (D) Bubo virginianus (LACM 109226), and (E) Strix nebulosa (MVZ 155426) illustrates the differences in the form of the Crista bicipitalis and the Sulcus ligamentum transversus. Radius, left, of O. brea (LACM RLB K9798), in (F) anterior, (G) proximal, and (H) posterior view.Anteroventral view of left proximal radii of (I) O. brea (LACM RLB K9798), (J) S. nebulosa (MVZ 151874), and (K) B. virginianus (LACM 109226) illustrates the differences in the form and position of the attachment for M. biceps brachii. Radius, distal end, left, of O. brea (LACM RLB K9627), in (L) dorsal, (M) distal, and (N) ventral view. Carpometacarpus, left, of O. brea (LACM RLB K9432), in (O) dorsal and (P) ventral view. Scale bar = 20 mm.	Figure 5. Humerus, right, of Oraristrix brea (LACM RLB E9804), in (A) anterior and (B) posterior view, and (C) proximal end in anteroproximal view.Anteroproximal view of proximal ends of (D) Bubo virginianus (LACM 109226), and (E) Strix nebulosa (MVZ 155426) illustrates the differences in the form of the Crista bicipitalis and the Sulcus ligamentum transversus. Radius, left, of O. brea (LACM RLB K9798), in (F) anterior, (G) proximal, and (H) posterior view.Anteroventral view of left proximal radii of (I) O. brea (LACM RLB K9798), (J) S. nebulosa (MVZ 151874), and (K) B. virginianus (LACM 109226) illustrates the differences in the form and position of the attachment for M. biceps brachii. Radius, distal end, left, of O. brea (LACM RLB K9627), in (L) dorsal, (M) distal, and (N) ventral view. Carpometacarpus, left, of O. brea (LACM RLB K9432), in (O) dorsal and (P) ventral view. Scale bar = 20 mm.	2010-05-26	Campbell, Kenneth E.;Bocheński, Zbigniew M.		Zenodo	biologists	Campbell, Kenneth E.;Bocheński, Zbigniew M.			
03CD566AF577A11AFEF67258FDB52A04.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5238896/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5238896	Figure 6. Ulna, right, of Oraristrix brea (LACM RLB E9544), in (A) anterior, (B) ventral, and (C) posterior view. Anteroproximal view of (D) O. brea (LACM RLB E9804), (E) Bubo virginianus (LACM 87413), and (F) Strix nebulosa (MVZ 155426) illustrate the differences in form of the olecranon and the position of the Tuberculum lig. coll. ventralis. Scale bar = 20 mm.	Figure 6. Ulna, right, of Oraristrix brea (LACM RLB E9544), in (A) anterior, (B) ventral, and (C) posterior view. Anteroproximal view of (D) O. brea (LACM RLB E9804), (E) Bubo virginianus (LACM 87413), and (F) Strix nebulosa (MVZ 155426) illustrate the differences in form of the olecranon and the position of the Tuberculum lig. coll. ventralis. Scale bar = 20 mm.	2010-05-26	Campbell, Kenneth E.;Bocheński, Zbigniew M.		Zenodo	biologists	Campbell, Kenneth E.;Bocheński, Zbigniew M.			
03CD566AF577A11AFEF67258FDB52A04.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5238900/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5238900	Figure 8. Synsacrum of Oraristrix brea (F3700) in (A) anterior, (B) ventral, and (C) lateral view. Views of the posterior ischium of (D) Bubo virginianus (LACM 110180) and (E) Strix nebulosa (MVZ 151874) illustrate the differences in the posterior ends of this bone in these species. There is no breakage to the posterior ischium of O. brea. Femur, right, of O. brea (K9427) in (F) anterior, (G) posterior, and (H) lateral view. Lateral views of the left proximal femur of (I) O. brea (K9428), (J) S. nebulosa (MVZ 155426), and (K) B. virginianus (LACM 109226) illustrate the differences in form of the Crista trochantericus and position of the attachment of M. iliotrochantericus posterior.Tibiotarsus,left, of O. brea (E9888) in (L) anterior, (M) posterior, and (N) proximal view. Medial views of left proximal tibiotarsi of (O) O. brea (E9888), (P) B. virginianus (LACM 109226), and (Q) S. nebulosa (MVZ 155426) illustrate the differences in form of the Crista cnemialis anterior and the size and position of the attachment of M. gastrocnemius, pars interna. Fibula, left, of O. brea (H9244) in (R) lateral view. Scale bar = 20 mm.	Figure 8. Synsacrum of Oraristrix brea (F3700) in (A) anterior, (B) ventral, and (C) lateral view. Views of the posterior ischium of (D) Bubo virginianus (LACM 110180) and (E) Strix nebulosa (MVZ 151874) illustrate the differences in the posterior ends of this bone in these species. There is no breakage to the posterior ischium of O. brea. Femur, right, of O. brea (K9427) in (F) anterior, (G) posterior, and (H) lateral view. Lateral views of the left proximal femur of (I) O. brea (K9428), (J) S. nebulosa (MVZ 155426), and (K) B. virginianus (LACM 109226) illustrate the differences in form of the Crista trochantericus and position of the attachment of M. iliotrochantericus posterior.Tibiotarsus,left, of O. brea (E9888) in (L) anterior, (M) posterior, and (N) proximal view. Medial views of left proximal tibiotarsi of (O) O. brea (E9888), (P) B. virginianus (LACM 109226), and (Q) S. nebulosa (MVZ 155426) illustrate the differences in form of the Crista cnemialis anterior and the size and position of the attachment of M. gastrocnemius, pars interna. Fibula, left, of O. brea (H9244) in (R) lateral view. Scale bar = 20 mm.	2010-05-26	Campbell, Kenneth E.;Bocheński, Zbigniew M.		Zenodo	biologists	Campbell, Kenneth E.;Bocheński, Zbigniew M.			
03CD566AF577A11AFEF67258FDB52A04.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5238887/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5238887	Figure 2. Intra-element proportions of the tarsometatarsus of Oraristrix brea distinguish it from modern species of owls. (A) Scatter diagram of length vs. width of posterior surface of hypotarsus. For its length, the posterior surface of the hypotarsus of O. brea is relatively narrow compared to that of modern owls. (B) Scatter diagram of total length vs. minimum shaft width of tarsometatarsus. The length of O. brea is within the upper values for Bubo virginianus, but most of the fossils have a relatively slender shaft. (C) Scatter diagram of total length vs. distal width of tarsometatarsus. The length of O. brea is within the upper values for Bubo virginianus, but most of the fossils have a relatively narrower distal end.	Figure 2. Intra-element proportions of the tarsometatarsus of Oraristrix brea distinguish it from modern species of owls. (A) Scatter diagram of length vs. width of posterior surface of hypotarsus. For its length, the posterior surface of the hypotarsus of O. brea is relatively narrow compared to that of modern owls. (B) Scatter diagram of total length vs. minimum shaft width of tarsometatarsus. The length of O. brea is within the upper values for Bubo virginianus, but most of the fossils have a relatively slender shaft. (C) Scatter diagram of total length vs. distal width of tarsometatarsus. The length of O. brea is within the upper values for Bubo virginianus, but most of the fossils have a relatively narrower distal end.	2010-05-26	Campbell, Kenneth E.;Bocheński, Zbigniew M.		Zenodo	biologists	Campbell, Kenneth E.;Bocheński, Zbigniew M.			
03CD566AF577A11AFEF67258FDB52A04.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5238889/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5238889	Figure 3. Intra-membral and inter-membral element plots give an indication of how Oraristrix brea differed from the modern owls Bubo bubo, B. virginianus, Strix nebulosa, S. occidentalis, S. varia, and S. aluco. (A) Tarsometatarsus length vs. tibiotarsus length. (B) Femur medial length vs. carpometacarpus length. (C) Tarsometatarsus length vs. humerus length. (D) Tarsometatarsus length vs. coracoid medial length. (E) Tarsometatarsus length vs. Carpometacarpus length. (F) Femur medial length vs. humeral length. For the modern species,… [continued on facing page]	Figure 3. Intra-membral and inter-membral element plots give an indication of how Oraristrix brea differed from the modern owls Bubo bubo, B. virginianus, Strix nebulosa, S. occidentalis, S. varia, and S. aluco. (A) Tarsometatarsus length vs. tibiotarsus length. (B) Femur medial length vs. carpometacarpus length. (C) Tarsometatarsus length vs. humerus length. (D) Tarsometatarsus length vs. coracoid medial length. (E) Tarsometatarsus length vs. Carpometacarpus length. (F) Femur medial length vs. humeral length. For the modern species,… [continued on facing page]	2010-05-26	Campbell, Kenneth E.;Bocheński, Zbigniew M.		Zenodo	biologists	Campbell, Kenneth E.;Bocheński, Zbigniew M.			
03CD566AF577A11AFEF67258FDB52A04.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5238898/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5238898	Figure 7. A scatter plot of total length vs. distal width of the carpometacarpus of Oraristrix	Figure 7. A scatter plot of total length vs. distal width of the carpometacarpus of Oraristrix	2010-05-26	Campbell, Kenneth E.;Bocheński, Zbigniew M.		Zenodo	biologists	Campbell, Kenneth E.;Bocheński, Zbigniew M.			
