identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03CBD9778B645F74FF72FE3DFD9CFF66.text	03CBD9778B645F74FF72FE3DFD9CFF66.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Agrilaxia (Agrilaxia) angustiptera	<div><p>Agrilaxia (Agrilaxia) angustiptera sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 2, 5, 11)</p><p>Type locality. French Guiana, Montagne des Chevaux.</p><p>Type specimens. Holotype (male, NMPC): “French Guyane, Montagne des Chevaux, 27.ix.2014 , SEAG team leg. // Polytrap lumineaux automatique avec rampe LED rose” ; allotype (female, NMPC): the same data .</p><p>Diagnosis. Medium-sized (6.1–6.6 mm), elongate, slightly flattened dorsally, dark with silky lustre (Fig. 2); dorsal surface black, elytra and lateral sides of pronotum with red or weak purple lustre, frons, antennae and legs blue-green; ventral surface bronze.</p><p>Description of the male holotype. Head large, prognathous, distinctly wider than anterior pronotal margin; anterior margin of frontoclypeus widely emarginate, frons narrow, flat, medially slightly depressed, vertex weakly grooved, 0.8 times as wide as width of eye; eyes very large, elliptical but not projecting beyond outline of head; antennae long, reaching posterior third of lateral pronotal margins when laid alongside; scape weakly claviform, 5.5 times as long as wide, pedicel ovoid, twice as long as wide; third antennomere almost subcylindrical, twice as long as wide, fourth antennomere triangular, 1.4 times as wide as long; antennomeres 5–10 trapezoidal, 0.8–1.0 times as wide as long, terminal antennomere axe-head shaped, about as long as wide; sculpture consisting of very small, not very dense, rounded cells with tiny central grains.</p><p>Pronotum rather convex, 1.2 times as long as wide with large, wide, lateroposterior depressions and small, deep prescutellar pit; anterior margin with large,wide, median lobe; posterior margin weakly biarcuate; lateral margins curved, deeply emarginate anterior to the sharp posterior angles, maximum pronotal width at mid-length; “agriloid carina” very distinct reaching posterior third of lateral margins; sculpture consisting of small, very dense, poorly defined polygonal cells anteriorly, and large polygonal cells with central grains laterally. Scutellum small, subcordiform, flat.</p><p>Elytra long, 3.4 times as long as wide, flattened, strongly narrowed anterior to mid-length, very slightly caudiform; humeral callosities large, basal, transverse depressions wide, deep, reaching scutellum; subhumeral carina well-defined, reaching almost mid-length of elytra; apex of elytra with very fine serrations; disc of elytra microsculptured without distinct sculpture but with rather intense, silky lustre.</p><p>Ventral surface lustrous with very fine, almost indistinct eye-shaped sculpture on abdominal ventrites and wide, well-defined eye-shaped sculpture with tiny central grains on pro- and metasternum; prosternum widely, transversally grooved behind anterior margin which is perpendicularly elevated and somewhat rolled posteriorly (Fig. 28 in Bílý &amp; Brûlé, 2013); prosternal process weakly convex; anal tergite spatulate, flat with lateral margins elevated, apically almost truncate without distinct apical serrations (Fig. 5); anal sternite apically regularly rounded without serrations. Legs relatively short, protibiae weakly curved, meso- and metatibiae straight, not modified; tarsal claws hook-shaped, weakly enlarged at base.</p><p>Aedeagus (Fig. 11) well-sclerotised, spindle-shaped, flattened, apex of parameres very slender, median lobe wide, simply pointed apically.</p><p>Measurement. Length: 6.1–6.6 mm (holotype 6.1 mm); width: 1.2–1.3 mm (holotype 1.2 mm).</p><p>Sexual dimorphism. The female differs from the male only by the slightly stouter body and somewhat wider frons; no sexual dichromatism.</p><p>Bionomy. Unknown.</p><p>Etymology. The specific epithet is derived from the Latin adjective “ angustus ” (narrow) and the Greek substantive “ pterón ” (wing) to stress the unusual shape of elytra.</p><p>Differential diagnosis. Agrilaxia (Agrilaxia) angustiptera sp. nov. is a very distinct species characterized mainly by the very narrowed (strongly waisted) elytra at their mid-length, dark colouration with the silky lustre, smooth posterior margins of the last sternite and tergite and by the form of the anterior prosternal margin. The only species it can be compared with is A. (A.) chrysifrons (Kerremans, 1896) described from a female from Brasil (without more precise data) which was recently found also in French Guiana (Bílý &amp; Brûlé, 2013). A. (A.) angustiptera sp. nov. differs from it by the green frons and black scutellum (black frons with green lustre and green scutellum in A. (A.) chrysifrons), narrower vertex and much larger eyes, longer and less caudiform elytra (distinctly caudiform and only 3 times as long as wide in A. (A.) chrysifrons), smooth posterior margins of the last tergite and ventrite (distinctly serrate in A. (A.) chrysifrons) and primarily by the typically prognathous mouth parts (only weakly prognathous head in A. (A.) chrysifrons). Aedeagus of A. (A.) angustiptera sp. nov. (Fig. 11) is more slender and spindle-shaped than that of A. (A.) chrysifrons (Fig. 14).</p><p>Distribution. French Guiana.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CBD9778B645F74FF72FE3DFD9CFF66	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Bílý, Svatopluk	Bílý, Svatopluk (2017): A study of the genus Agrilaxia Kerremans, 1903 from French Guiana (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Anthaxiini). Zootaxa 4216 (1): 65-72, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.229828
03CBD9778B665F73FF72F952FD9CFEE8.text	03CBD9778B665F73FF72F952FD9CFEE8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Agrilaxia (Agrilaxia) antennata	<div><p>Agrilaxia (Agrilaxia) antennata sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 1, 6, 9, 13)</p><p>Type locality. French Guiana, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-52.441113&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=4.748889" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -52.441113/lat 4.748889)">Montaigne</a> des Chevaux, Roura district, 4°44′56′′ N 52°26′28′′ W.</p><p>Type specimens. Holotype (male, NMPC): “ Guyane Française, M.gne [Montagne] des Chevaux, 4.viii.2012, S. Brûlé leg.” ; allotype (female, NMPC): “French Guyane, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-52.34833&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=4.858611" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -52.34833/lat 4.858611)">Mont Grand Matouri</a>, 4°51′31′′N 52°20′54′′W, 3.x.2014, forest edge , SEAG team leg. // piège interception vitré”; paratypes: the same data as allotype (1 female, GCCI); “ Guyane Fr., Mont.[] <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-52.441113&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=4.748889" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -52.441113/lat 4.748889)">Montagne</a>] de Chevaux, Com. de Roura, RN 2 PK22, 4°44′56′′ N 52°26′28′′ W, 75 m, 12.iv.2010, P.- H. Dalens leg.” (1 male, NMPC) .</p><p><a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-53.2&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=3.6166668" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -53.2/lat 3.6166668)">Specimens</a> not included among paratypes: remnants of 2 fragmentary specimens labelled: “ Guyane Fr., Res. N. des Nouragues, Camp Inselberg, ex larva, Comm. Régina, 3°37′N 53°12′W, 12.ix.2010, S. Brûlé, P.- H. Dalens &amp; S. Fernandez leg.” (specimens mentioned as “sp. A” in Bílý &amp; Brûlé, 2013).</p><p>Diagnosis. Small (4.5–5.3 mm), very slender, Agrilus -like (Fig. 1); dorsal surface black with weak violet (male) or golden (female) lustre; frons of male green, that of female black-bronze; ventral surface of both sexes black with slight bronze lustre; antennae of male very long, reaching beyond humeral callosities when laid alongside, antennomeres 1–6 black with strong green lustre, antennomeres 7–11 yellow-brown; antennae of female short, hardly reaching midlength of lateral pronotal margins, black with green lustre; legs of male black with strong green lustre, those of female black.</p><p>Description of the male holotype. Head large, distinctly wider than pronotum, frons rather strongly convex with small, very shallow, postclypeal depression; frontoclypeus very narrow, anterior margin weakly emarginate; vertex nearly twice as wide as width of eye; eyes large, elliptical, projecting beyond outline of head; antennae very long, reaching beyond humeral callosities when laid alongside; scape 5 times as long as wide, slightly curved, pedicel ovoid, 1.5 times as long as wide; third antennomere narrow, slender, 2.3 times as long as wide, weakly triangular, antennomeres 4 and 5 axe-head shaped, 1.8 times as long as wide; 6th antennomere triangular, 1.5 times as long as wide, antennomeres 7–10 trapezoidal, nearly twice as long as wide, terminal antennomere rhomboid, 2.2 times as long as wide; sculpture consisting of basal microsculpture and small, polygonal, weakly developed cells without central grains.</p><p>Pronotum almost regularly convex, nearly parallel-sided, 1.2 times as wide as long with wide but shallow lateroposterior depressions; “agriloid” carina reaching posterior third of pronotal length, prescutellar pit small, shallow, almost indistinguishable; posterior pronotal angles acute; anterior margin with a wide, strongly developed median lobe, posterior margin nearly regularly curved with small prehumeral emarginations; sculpture consisting of small, dense polygonal cells without central grains. Scutellum very small, flat, subcordiform, about as long as wide.</p><p>Elytra matte, 3.2 times as long as wide, weakly convex but flattened at basal fifth, somewhat caudiform; lateral margins widely emarginate at midlength, subhumeral carina sharp, reaching elytral mid-length; humeral callosities small but well-developed, basal, transverse depression deep and wide reaching scutellum; apex of elytra with very fine serrations, elytral epipleura very narrow, not reaching apex; sculpture consisting of fine, silky microsculpture only.</p><p>Ventral surface lustrous with weakly developed polygonal sculpture, four apical ventrites of abdomen with fine longitudinal striae; both anal sternite and ventrite regularly rounded with finely serrate apical margins (Fig. 6); prosternum anteriorly with deep groove and rolled up anterior margin (Fig. 27 in Bílý &amp; Brûlé, 2013), prosternal process strongly convex with sharp, medial, longitudinal carina (Fig. 9). Legs relatively long, slender, all tibiae straight becoming wider apically, tarsomere 1 of hind metatarsus as long as tarsomeres 2–5 together. Tarsal claws relatively long, only weakly hook-shaped, slightly enlarged at base.</p><p>Aedeagus (Fig. 13) short, flattened, slightly spindle-shaped, median lobe obtusely pointed apically.</p><p>Measurement. Length: 4.5–5.3 mm (holotype 4.5 mm); width: 1.0– 1.2 mm (holotype 1.0 mm).</p><p>Sexual dimorphism. Except for the weak difference in the colouration (see above), the female differs from the male by the somewhat stouter body, less convex frons, very short, unicolorous antennae (reaching only mid-length of lateral pronotal margins when laid alongside), and significantly by the form of the prosternal process which is only weakly convex without the medial carina; anterior margin of prosternum of the same shape as in the male. The tarsomere 1 of the hind metatarsus of the female also relatively long but significantly shorter than the tarsomeres 2– 5.</p><p>Variability. No variability was observed except for the size and the slight sexual dichromatism.</p><p>Bionomy. Unknown.</p><p>Etymology. The specific epithet was derived from the Latin substantive “ antenna ” to stress the extraordinary length and the strange colouration of the male antennae.</p><p>Differential diagnosis. Agrilaxia (Agrilaxia) antennata sp. nov. can be easily identified due to the very slender, black body, rather strongly convex frons, unusual shape of the prosternum (especially in the male), very long hind metatarsus and the extremely long, bicolorous male antennae. All these characters are quite unusual in the subgen. Agrilaxia s. str. so this species cannot be confused with any species of Agrilaxia of a similar shape and colouration.</p><p>Distribution. French Guiana.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CBD9778B665F73FF72F952FD9CFEE8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Bílý, Svatopluk	Bílý, Svatopluk (2017): A study of the genus Agrilaxia Kerremans, 1903 from French Guiana (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Anthaxiini). Zootaxa 4216 (1): 65-72, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.229828
03CBD9778B605F72FF72FF72FD9CFFB9.text	03CBD9778B605F72FF72FF72FD9CFFB9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Agrilaxia (Agrilaxia) nigra	<div><p>Agrilaxia (Agrilaxia) nigra sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 3, 7, 12)</p><p>Type locality. French Guiana, Montagne des Chevaux.</p><p>Type specimen. Holotype (male, NMPC): “ Guyane Française, M.gne [Montagne] des Chevaux, 19.x.2013, S. Brûlé leg.”.</p><p>Diagnosis. Small (4.7 mm), slender, subcylindrical, entirely black, ventral surface with very weak, brassy lustre (Fig. 3).</p><p>Description of the male holotype. Head large, not prognathous, as wide as anterior pronotal margin; anterior margin of frontoclypeus straight, frons flat; vertex weakly convex, as wide as width of eye; eyes large, elliptical, not projecting beyond outline of head; antennae short reaching posterior third of lateral pronotal margins when laid alongside; scape slightly claviform, 5 times as long as wide, pedicel ovoid, twice as long as wide; third antennomere subcylindrical, 1.5 times as long as wide, antennomeres 4–10 triangular to trapezoidal, 1.2–1.5 times as wide as long, terminal antennomere rhomboid, slightly longer than wide; sculpture consisting of small, fine, simple punctures on frons and small, dense, poorly defined, polygonal cells without central grains on vertex.</p><p>Pronotum rather convex, 1.3 times as wide as long with wide, deep lateroposterior depressions; anterior margin bisinuate with wide median lobe, posterior margin weakly bisinuate; lateral margins very slightly curved, emarginate anterior to posterior angles; prescutellar pit deep, laterally separated by small, prominent swellings; “agriloid” carina small, short, weakly developed, posterior angles rectangular; sculpture consisting of very small, polygonal cells with small, flat central grains. Scutellum small, pentagonal, almost twice as wide as long.</p><p>Elytra slender, flattened, 3.3 times as long as wide, slightly caudiform; humeral callosities small, not projecting beyond outline of elytra; subhumeral carina fine, almost reaching elytral mid-length, elytral apex with very fine, almost indistinct serrations; basal, transverse elytral depressions very wide, deep, reaching scutellum; elytra smooth, with very weak, nearly indistinct traces of striae on anterior third, sculpture consisting of very fine microsculpture.</p><p>Ventral surface lustrous, with fine eye-shaped sculpture on abdominal ventrites and fine eye-shaped sculpture on pro- and metasternum; prosternal process flat, weakly widening posterior to procoxae, anterior margin of prosternum elevated perpendicularly to surface of prosternum (Fig. 26 in Bílý &amp; Brûlé, 2013), rather deeply emarginate medially; anal ventrite truncate with fine lateral serrations, anal tergite obtusely rounded and sharply serrate (Fig. 7). Legs moderately long, protibiae very slightly curved, meso- and metatibiae straight; tarsal claws brown, hook-shaped, only very slightly enlarged at base.</p><p>Aedeagus (Fig. 12) very short, widely spindle-shaped, apical half of parameres membraneous, median lobe wide, pointed apically.</p><p>Measurement. Length: 4.7 mm; width: 1.0 mm.</p><p>Sexual dimorphism. Female unknown.</p><p>Bionomy. Unknown.</p><p>Etymology. The species epithet is derived from the Latin adjective “ niger ” (black) since this species is entirely black.</p><p>Differential diagnosis. Agrilaxia (Agrilaxia) nigra sp. nov. is rather similar to the sympatric species A. (A.) chrysifrons (Kerremans, 1896) from which it differs by the flat, black frons (frons weakly depressed and green in A. (A.) chrysifrons), black, pentagonal scutellum (golden green, semicircular scutellum in A. (A.) chrysifrons), shorter subhumeral carina, well developed central grains on pronotum, by the sharply serrate anal tergite (only finely serrate in A. (A.) chrysifrons) and by the form of the male genitalia (Figs 12 vs. 14).</p><p>Distribution. French Guiana.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CBD9778B605F72FF72FF72FD9CFFB9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Bílý, Svatopluk	Bílý, Svatopluk (2017): A study of the genus Agrilaxia Kerremans, 1903 from French Guiana (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Anthaxiini). Zootaxa 4216 (1): 65-72, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.229828
03CBD9778B605F71FF72F8EBFD9CFF52.text	03CBD9778B605F71FF72F8EBFD9CFF52.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Agrilaxia (Agrilaxia) nigropurpurea	<div><p>Agrilaxia (Agrilaxia) nigropurpurea sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs. 4, 8, 10)</p><p>Type locality. North-eastern French Guiana, Cayenne, Montagne de Kaw, 200– 300 m . Type specimen. Holotype (male, NMPC): “Francösisch Guyana nord-ost, Cayenne, Montagne de Kaw, 200– 300 m, 28.vi.–12.vii.2007, A. Puchner leg.”.</p><p>Diagnosis. Rather large (7.1 mm), slender, subcylindrical, weakly tapering posteriorly (Fig. 4); dorsal surface black, frontoclypeus green, frons with feeble brassy lustre; lateral sides of pronotum dark purple; pronotum with poorly defined, greenish medial line reaching pronotal mid-length; ventral surface black with weak purple lustre, metacoxae with intense, bright purple lustre.</p><p>Description of the male holotype. Head large, as wide as anterior pronotal margin; anterior margin of frontoclypeus straight, frons moderately convex, vertex flat, 1.2 times as wide as width of eye; eyes large, slightly projecting beyond outline of head; antennae relatively short, reaching mid-length of lateral pronotal margins when laid alongside; scape weakly claviform, slightly curved, 5.0 times as long as wide, pedicel ovoid, almost twice as long as wide; third antennomere very slightly triangular, 1.6 times as long as wide, fourth antennomere widely triangular, about as wide as long; antennomeres 5–10 trapezoidal, 1.2–1.5 times as wide as long, terminal antennomere axe-head shaped, slightly longer than wide; sculpture consisting of very small, dense, round or polygonal cells without central grains.</p><p>Pronotum rather convex, 1.3 times as wide as long with deep lateroposterior depressions and wide, shallow prescutellar pit; anterior margin with large median lobe, posterior margin almost straight; lateral margins S-shaped, posterior angles acute, maximum pronotal width at anterior third; “agriloid” carina absent; sculpture homogeneous consisting of small, very dense, polygonal cells, small central grains visible only in lateroposterior depressions. Scutellum relatively large, pentagonal, flat.</p><p>Elytra 3.0 times as long as wide, weakly convex, very slightly caudiform; humeral callosities large, basal, transverse depressions wide, deep, reaching scutellum separated from it by short, lustrous, elevated carina; subhumeral carina well-defined, reaching anterior third of elytra; extreme apex of elytra with extremely fine, almost indistinct serrations; sculpture fine, homogeneous consisting of tiny transverse rugae and very fine granular sculpture.</p><p>Ventral surface lustrous with very fine, almost indistinct eye-shaped sculpture on abdominal ventrites and broad, well-defined eye-shaped sculpture with tiny central grains on pro- and metasternum; prosternum, transversally grooved behind full width of anterior margin which is perpendicularly elevated (Fig. 26 in Bílý &amp; Brûlé, 2013); prosternal process flat; anal tergite finger nail-shaped, slightly depressed, apically almost truncate with rather rough serrations (Fig. 8); anal sternite apically almost regularly rounded, roughly serrate and transversely depressed before apical margin. Legs relatively short, protibiae weakly curved, meso- and metatibiae almost straight, not modified; tarsal claws hook-shaped, weakly enlarged at base.</p><p>Aedeagus (Fig. 10) very long and slender, well-sclerotised, dorsoventrally bent, parameres only weakly enlarged apically, median lobe simply pointed apically.</p><p>Measurement. Length: 7.1 mm; width: 1.8 mm.</p><p>Sexual dimorphism. Female unknown.</p><p>Bionomy. Unknown.</p><p>Etymology. The specific epithet was selected to stress the distinctive colouration of the species: black with purple lustre of the ventral surface.</p><p>Differential diagnosis. Due to the distinctive colouration (Fig. 4), convex frons, absence of the “agriloid” carina” and the very long, dorsoventrally bent aedeagus it is not possible to attribute Agrilaxia (Agrilaxia) nigropurpurea sp. nov. to any species-group of the subgen. Agrilaxia . The habitus resembles some species of the genus Agrilus Curtis, 1825 more then any known species of Agrilaxia .</p><p>Distribution. French Guiana.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CBD9778B605F71FF72F8EBFD9CFF52	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Bílý, Svatopluk	Bílý, Svatopluk (2017): A study of the genus Agrilaxia Kerremans, 1903 from French Guiana (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Anthaxiini). Zootaxa 4216 (1): 65-72, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.229828
03CBD9778B635F70FF72F946FEC9F9D7.text	03CBD9778B635F70FF72F946FEC9F9D7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Agrilaxia (Agrilaxia) chrysifrons (Kerremans 1896) Kerremans 1896	<div><p>Agrilaxia (Agrilaxia) chrysifrons (Kerremans, 1896)</p><p>(Fig. 14)</p><p>This species was described for a single female labelled “ Brésil, Manuf.[acturé de] Tabac” (Kerremans, 1896). From French Guiane it was recorded by Bílý &amp; Brûlé (2013) from the Kaw region and recently I have studied specimens from the following new localities:</p><p>“La Désirée, N4°50′42′′ W 52°20′54′′, 1.viii.2014, SEAG team leg. // Light trap LED bleu” (2 males, NMPC); “Régina—ex larva, 4.i.2013, S. Brûlé leg.” (2 females, NMPC, GCCI); “M.gne [Montagne] des Chevaux, 25.xi.2012, S. Brûlé leg.” (1 female, GCCI).</p><p>Bionomy. Unknown, but two males were obtained by means of the light trap (see above) which is very unusual in Buprestidae .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CBD9778B635F70FF72F946FEC9F9D7	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Bílý, Svatopluk	Bílý, Svatopluk (2017): A study of the genus Agrilaxia Kerremans, 1903 from French Guiana (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Anthaxiini). Zootaxa 4216 (1): 65-72, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.229828
