identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03D78781172C3811FF63F8FA9AD3FCAE.text	03D78781172C3811FF63F8FA9AD3FCAE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptopontius phyllogorgius Farias & Neves & Johnsson 2020	<div><p>Cryptopontius phyllogorgius sp. nov.</p><p>ZooBank under urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 7072200F-E08A-4659-BCDC-0C4B4AE3ACED</p><p>(Figures 2–4)</p><p>Material examined. Holotype female (UFBA 3331), Periperi Beach (12°51’59”S, 38°28’47”W), Salvador city, Bahia State, Brazil, collected by I. Bonfim and A. Farias on August 30, 2015. Specimens found associated with the gorgonian Phyllogorgia dilatata (Esper 1806) . Holotype dissected and mounted on slide.</p><p>Description of female. Body (Fig. 2A) cyclopiform, dorsoventrally flattened, 1.107 µm long, 584 µm wide. Cephalothorax 584 long and 769 µm wide (length:width ratio = 0.7:1); with greatest width at posterior quarter; epimera of cephalothorax and first pedigerous somite with slightly projected posterior corners. Prosome 784 µm long and 769 µm wide, nearly as wide as long, (length: width ratio = 1:0.9). Epimera of fourth pedigerous somite not visible in dorsal view and extended to anterior a quarter of genital double-somite. Urosome (Fig. 2B) 251 µm long and 184 µm wide (length: width ratio = 1:0.7), composed of five somites. Genital double-somite 109 µm long and maximum width 184 µm, length: width ratio = 0.6:1. Two postgenital somites, both wider than long (82 × 21 and 76 × 24 µm, respectively), anal somite nearly as long as two postgenital somites (84,4 × 51,5 um). Caudal rami nearly as long as wide (37 × 34), length: width ratio = 1:0.9, armed with six setae.</p><p>Antennule (Fig. 2C) 271 µm long (not including setae), 9-segmented. Lengths of segments in proximal to distal order: 49, 14, 57, 24, 15, 23, 20, 21 and 48 µm respectively. Segmental homologies and setation as follows: 1(I)-1; 2(II)-2; 3(III–VIII)11; 4(IX–XII)-7; 5(XIII–XIV)-1+I; 6(XV–XVI)-1; 7(XVII–XVIII)-1; 8(XIX–XX)-1; 9(XXI– XXVIII)-11+Aesthetasc. Segment 2 with long seta showing robust basis; a spine on segment 5 and very slender and long seta on terminal segment. Aesthetasc 79 µm long.</p><p>Antenna (Fig. 2D) with coxa 11 µm long; basis 34 µm long. Exopod 1-segmented, 6 µm long, with two distal naked setae. Endopod 2-segmented, first segment 21 µm long, unarmed; second segment 27 µm long, armed with short subproximal, 19 µm long, located at about half of the segment and two distal setae, a short one and a robust long spine-like seta, both 27 and 61 µm long respectively. All endopodal setae plumose.</p><p>Oral cone (Fig. 3A) 503 µm long, reaching insertion of leg 1. Mandible (Fig. 3B) comprising stylet inserted into oral cone, distal margin armed with few denticles.</p><p>Mandibular palp absent.</p><p>Maxillule (Fig. 3C) bilobed; inner and outer lobes measuring 73 and 63 µm long, respectively. Each lobe armed with two distal setae. Inner lobe tapering, armed with long plumose seta and short naked seta, 36 and 14 µm long, respectively. Outer lobe armed with two strong setae, 63 and 46 µm long, respectively; longer seta armed with large sparse spinules on inner margin; outer lobe armed with row of long setules on outer margin. Maxilla (Fig. 3D) 506 µm long; unarmed syncoxa, 238 µm long and thin claw strongly curved distally towards outer margin and armed distally with naked seta.</p><p>Maxilliped (Fig. 3E) 4-segmented, 376 µm long; syncoxa unarmed, 34 µm long; basis longest, 144 µm long, with seta on medial inner margin. Endopod 2-segmented, measuring 62 and 46 µm long, respectively. First segment with naked seta distally; second segment with naked spine-like seta close to curved claw-like element, 90 µm long.</p><p>Legs 1−3 (Figs. 4 A−C), biramous, with 3-segmented rami. Leg 4 (Fig. 4D) with 3-segmented exopod, and endopod absent. Armature formula as follows:</p><p>Coxa and basis of first leg (Fig. 4A) with short plumose setae. Legs 2 and 3 (Figs. 4B and 4C) with outer margin of exopod with spinules and outer margin of endopod showing setules, except the first endopod of leg 3. Leg 3 (Fig. 4C) with row of short setules on outer margin of coxa and slender naked seta on outer margin of basis. Legs 2–3 showing long, robust spine distally on third exopodal and endopodal segments. Legs 1–3 with two tooth-like processes on distal outer margin of second endopodal segment. Fifth leg (Fig. 2B) has a protopodal segment fused to somite, and a free reduced exopodal segment, nearly as wide as long, with 3 distal naked setae. Leg 6 located midlaterally with single seta.</p><p>Male: Unknown</p><p>Etymology. The specific name refers to the host species, Phyllogorgia dilatata (Esper, 1806) .</p><p>Remarks. Among other features, Cryptopontius can be distinguished from the others genera of Artotrogidae by having both rami of first leg 3-segmented, with 3 spines and 4 or 5 setae (III, 4/5) on third exopodal segment; leg 4 uniramous, lacking endopod, or represented by a single seta on a minute segment (Boxshall &amp; Halsey 2004).</p><p>The new species shares a 9-segmented antennule with another 12 species of the genus. However, this pattern can be achieved in two different ways in the genus. The first pattern occurs with the ancestral segment II free and the segments III-VIII fused, as can be observed in six species: C. tenuis (Giesbrecht, 1895), C. gracilis Wilson, 1932, C. orientalis Ummerkutty, 1961, C. graciloides Ummerkutty, 1961, C. paracapitalis Nicholls in Eiselt, 1961 and C. tanacredii Johnsson, Rocha &amp; Boyko, 2002 (Giesbrecht 1895; Wilson 1932; Ummerkutty 1961; Eiselt 1961; Johnsson et al. 2002). The second pattern shows the fusion of ancestral segments II-VII and the segment VIII free, as seen in the remaining six species: C. brevifurcatus (Giesbrecht, 1895), C. brevicaudatus (Brady, 1899), C. longipes Nicholls, 1944, C. proximus Nicholls, 1944, C. madeirensis Johnsson, 2001 and C. acutus Kim, 2007 (Giesbrecht 1895; Brady 1899; Nicholls 1944; Johnsson 2001 and Kim 2007). Cryptopontius phyllogorgius sp. nov. shows the identical fusion pattern of the second group of species.</p><p>Cryptopontius phyllogorgius sp. nov. differs from C. longipes and C. acutus in having nine elements on the third exopodal segment of leg 4 (Nicholls 1944; Kim 2007) instead of eight. The new species can be distinguished from C. proximus, C. gracilis, C. tenuis and C. orientalis by having two setae on the second endopodal segment of P1 instead of one (Giesbrecht 1895; Wilson 1932; Nicholls 1944; Ummerkutty 1961).</p><p>The maxillule outer lobe of C. brevifurcatus has three setae (Brady 1899), whereas the new species has only two. In addition, Cryptopontius phyllogorgius sp. nov. has two setae on the inner lobe of the maxillule, distinct from C. brevicaudatus and C. madeirensis which have three setae (Brady 1899; Johnsson 2001) and C. paracapitalis with only one seta (Eiselt 1961). C. tanacredii and C. graciloides also have two setae on the inner lobe, but, in C. tanacredii the inner lobe is remarkable longer than the outer one and C. graciloides has a single seta on the antennal exopod (Ummerkutty 1961; Johnsson et al. 2002).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D78781172C3811FF63F8FA9AD3FCAE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Farias, Amilcar;Neves, Elizabeth G.;Johnsson, Rodrigo	Farias, Amilcar, Neves, Elizabeth G., Johnsson, Rodrigo (2020): Two new species of Cryptopontius Giesbrecht, 1899 (Copepoda, Siphonostomatoida Artotrogidae) associated with invertebrates from Northeastern Brazil. Zootaxa 4810 (3): 481-494, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4810.3.5
03D78781172B381CFF63FC4C99DDFDEA.text	03D78781172B381CFF63FC4C99DDFDEA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptopontius pentadikos Farias & Neves & Johnsson 2020	<div><p>Cryptopontius pentadikos sp. nov.</p><p>ZooBank under urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 404642DE-81E5-4B4C-90BD-33CA417E4443</p><p>(Figures 5–8)</p><p>Material examined. Holotype male (UFBA 3332), allotype juvenile female (UFBA 3333) and one paratype male (UFBA 3334); Periperi Beach (12°51’59”S, 38°28’47”W), Salvador city, Bahia State, Brazil, collected by I. Bonfim and A. Farias on August 30, 2015. Specimens found associated with the sponge Clathria sp . Holotype and allotype dissected and mounted on permanent slides, paratype preserved in ethanol 70%.</p><p>Description of male. Body (Fig. 5A) cyclopiform, dorsoventrally flattened, 922 µm long, 465 µm wide. Cephalotorax nearly as long as wide, 459 µm long and 465 µm wide (length:width ratio = 1:0.9); epimera of cephalothorax, first and second pedigerous somites with slightly projected posterior corners. Prosome 611 µm long, longer than wide (length:width ratio = 1:0.7). Fourth pedigerous somite narrow and bow-shaped due to posterior corners highly projected and fifth pedigerous somite reduced. Urosome (Fig. 5B) 365 µm long and 192 µm wide (length: width ratio = 1:0.5), composed of six somites. Genital somite 102 µm long and maximum width 192 µm, (length: width ratio = 0.5:1). Four postgenital somites all wider than long (124×44, 123×38, 102×37 and, 99× 52 µm, respectively). Prosome: urosome ratio = 1:0.6. Caudal rami (Fig. 5B) nearly longer than wide, 50× 41 µm. Length: width ratio = 1:0.8, armed with six setae.</p><p>Antennule (Fig. 5C) 266 µm long (not including setae), 11-segmented. Length of segments in proximal to distal order: 49, 13, 35, 11, 9, 10, 14, 9, 43, 21 and 52 µm respectively. Segmental homologies as follows: 1(I)-10; 2(II)-1+ae; 3(III–VI)-4+4ae; 4(VII)-1+ae; 5(VIII)-1; 6(IX–XII)-2+ae; 7(XIII)-1+1ae; 8(XIV)-1+ae; 9(XV–XVIII)- 3+4ae; 10(XIX–XX)-1+ae; 11(XXI–XXVIII)-11+ae. Terminal aesthetasc 134 µm long. Rounded spots on segments representing scars of missing setae in first segment, and aesthetascs on second, third and, fourth ones.</p><p>Antenna (Fig. 5D) with basis 27 µm long. Exopod 1-segmented, 8 µm long, with two long naked apical setae. Endopod 2-segmented, first segment 19 µm long, unarmed; second segment 29 µm long, armed with naked seta on proximal inner margin and two long robust setae distally located, 37 and 30 µm long, longer one with denticles on inner margin.</p><p>Mandible (Fig. 6A) comprising stylet 323 µm long, inserted into oral cone; oral cone reaching maxilliped basis. Mandibular stylet distally showing serrated region with small setules. Mandibular palp absent.</p><p>Maxillule (Fig. 6B) bilobed, inner and outer lobes with 66 and 40 µm long, respectively. Inner lobe laterally naked, armed with two slender setae, both broken. Outer lobe ornamented with long setules on outer margin, two robust setae distally, 34 and 46 µm long respectively, both setae armed with small setules on outer margin, longer seta armed with strong and sparse denticles. Maxilla (Fig. 6C) with unarmed syncoxa, 166 µm long, and claw, 205 µm long; claw with subdistal naked seta, protrusions on outer margin and tip bent forming 90-degree angle.</p><p>Maxilliped (Fig. 6D) 3-segmented, 368 µm long; basis 192 µm long, unarmed. Endopod 2-segmented, measuring 17 and 39 µm long respectively and curved claw-like element, 89 µm long. First and second endopodal segments with naked seta distally on each segment.</p><p>Legs 1−3 (Figs. 7 A−D) biramous, with 3-segmented rami, leg 4 with exopod 3-segmented and endopod absent. Armature formula as follows:</p><p>Leg 3 (Fig. 7C) showing coxa with row of long setules on outer margin and long plumose seta on inner margin. Additionally, leg 3 showing seta much smaller than distal spine on third endopodal segment. Leg 4 (Fig. 7D) showing minute plumose setae on inner margin of coxa, small naked seta on outer margin of basis and long distal spine on the third exopodal segment. Leg 5 (Fig. 4E) with basal seta located in the protopodal segment fused to somite, exopodal segment longer than wide, 4× 2 µm, with lateral seta and two distally located setae. Leg 6 located midventrally, with three naked setae.</p><p>Juvenile Female. Body (Fig. 8A) cyclopiform, dorsoventrally flattened, length (excluding caudal setae) 658 µm and body width 293 µm. Prosome longer than wide 486× 297 µm. Length:width ratio = 1:0.6. Epimera of cephalothorax, first and second pedigerous somite with slightly projected posterior corners as in male. Fourth pedigerous somite slightly less projected and bow-shaped as in male, fifth pedigerous somite reduced. Urosome (Fig. 8B), 172 µm long, composed of five somites. Genital double-somite 41 µm long and maximum width 101 µm, length:width ratio = 0.4:1. Three postgenital somites wider than long (18×79, 27×71 and, 32× 72 µm respectively). Caudal rami (Fig. 8B) longer than wide, 33× 28 µm. Length:width ratio 1:0.8, armed with six setae. Antennule, antenna and oral appendages broken. Leg 5 (Fig. 8B) with protopodal segment fused to somite, basal seta broken, rudimentary free exopodal segment, as wide as long with 2 distal naked setae. Other legs as in male.</p><p>Etymology. The specific name “ pentadikos ”, from the Greek meaning “five”, alludes to the proximal region of the antennule, in which there are five segments, resulting from the fusion of ancestral segments III to VI.</p><p>Remarks. Although most of the Cryptopontius species have been described based on female individuals, there are some artotrogid species descriptions based in male specimens such as Bradypontius ovatus Nicholls, 1944, Artotrogus latifurcatus Nicholls, 1944, Tardotrogus challengeri Eiselt, 1961, Antarctopontius spinipes Eiselt, 1965, Bradypontius ancistronus Neves &amp; Johnsson, 2008, and C. aesthetascus Neves &amp; Johnsson, 2008 (Nicholls 1944; Eiselt 1961; 1965; Neves &amp; Johnsson 2008). Moreover, as pointed out by Neves &amp; Johnsson (2008), non-sexually dimorphic features can distinguish male from female specimens, which means all characteristics except general aspects of body, urosome and distal antennule segmentation (XIII to XXVIII).</p><p>Cryptopontius pentadikos sp. nov. shows a uniramous fourth leg with nine elements on the third exopodal segment, 2 and 6 setae on the second and third endopodal segment of leg 1, respectively. The new species shares these features with C. paracapitalis Nicholls, 1944, C. madeirensis Johnsson, 2001, C. tanacredii Johnsson, Rocha &amp; Boyko, 2002, C. graciloides Ummerkutty, 1961, C. ascidius Kim, 1996, C. aesthetascus, C. brevifurcatus (Giesbrecht, 1895), C. brevicaudatus (Brady, 1910), C. expletus Neves &amp; Johnsson, 2008 and C. phyllogorgius sp. nov. However, C. pentadikos sp. nov. can be distinguished from all these species by having ancestral segments III-VI fused and five expressed antennulary segments, rather than three as in [fc] Cryptopontius phyllogorgius . sp. nov., C. graciloides, C. madeirensis, C. expletus and C. tanacredii, four as in C. paracapitalis, C. brevicaudatus, C. brevifurcatus and C. ascidius and seven in C. aesthetascus proximal to fused ancestral segments IX-XII (Nicholls 1944; Ummerkutty 1961; Kim 1996; Johnsson 2001; Johnsson et al. 2002; Neves &amp; Johnsson 2008).</p><p>Moreover, C. pentadikos sp. nov. differs from C. brevifurcatus and C. ascidius by having maxillule outer lobe with 2 setae instead of 3 (Giesbrecht 1895; Kim 1996); from C. paracapitalis by having maxillule inner lobe with two setae instead of 1 (Nicholls 1944), or from C. brevicaudatus and C. madeirensis that have 3 setae on inner lobe (Giesbrecht 1895; Johnsson 2001); from C. tanacredii by having maxillule inner lobe with similar length to outer lobe (Johnsson et al. 2002) and from C gracilioides that has a single terminal seta on the antennal exopod (Ummerkutty 1961), instead of two as in the new species.</p><p>Cryptopontius pentadikos sp nov. and C. phyllogorgius sp nov. differ from the others Brazilians species by having 11 and 9 antennulary segments, respectively, instead of 12 on C. aesthetascus and 8 in C. expletus . Also, C. aesthetascus and C. expletus show 3 apical setae, instead of 2 apical and a single basal seta on the second segment of antennal endopod. C. aesthetascus has a 3-segmented maxilliped endopod, character absent in all Brazilian species, that have 2 segments.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D78781172B381CFF63FC4C99DDFDEA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Farias, Amilcar;Neves, Elizabeth G.;Johnsson, Rodrigo	Farias, Amilcar, Neves, Elizabeth G., Johnsson, Rodrigo (2020): Two new species of Cryptopontius Giesbrecht, 1899 (Copepoda, Siphonostomatoida Artotrogidae) associated with invertebrates from Northeastern Brazil. Zootaxa 4810 (3): 481-494, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4810.3.5
03D787811726381BFF63F9439D83F9E3.text	03D787811726381BFF63F9439D83F9E3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptopontius Giesbrecht 1899	<div><p>Key to the species of the genus Cryptopontius</p><p>1. Endopod of leg 4 reduced to a single segment ….......................................... C. digitatus Kim, 1996</p><p>- Endopod of leg 4 absent …............................................................................. 2</p><p>2(1). Antennule with 7 segments proximal to fused ancestral segments IX–XII, with ancestral segments III–IV fused …............................................................................ C. aesthetascus Neves &amp; Johnsson, 2008</p><p>- Antennule with less than 7 segments proximal to fused ancestral segments IX–XII ….............................. 3</p><p>3(2). Antennule with 5 segments proximal to fused ancestral segments IX–XII, with ancestral segments III–VI fused ….......................................................................................... C. pentadikos sp. nov.</p><p>- Antennule with less than 5 segments proximal to fused ancestral segments IX–XII...............................… 4</p><p>4(3). Female antennule 8-segmented …........................................................................ 5</p><p>- Female antennule with more than 8-segmented ….......................................................... 11</p><p>5(4). Caudal rami longer than anal somite ….................................................................... 6</p><p>- Caudal rami shorter than anal somite ….................................................. C. ricinius Malt, 1991</p><p>6(5). Second endopodal segment of leg 1 armed with one or two setae …............................................. 7</p><p>- Second endopodal segment of leg 1 unarmed …......................................... C. ignotus (Brady, 1910)</p><p>7(6). Second endopodal segment of leg 1 with single seta …....................................................... 8</p><p>- Second endopodal segment of leg 1 with two setae …........................................................ 9</p><p>8(7). Antennal exopod with single seta …..................................................... C. latus (Brady, 1910)</p><p>- Antennal exopod with two setae …...................................................... C. minor Stock, 1965</p><p>9(7). Third exopodal segment of leg 1 with eight elements......................................................… 10</p><p>- Third exopodal segment of leg 1 with seven elements …................................. C. quinquesetus Kim, 1996</p><p>10(9). Third endopodal segment of leg 1 with six setae and three setae on the free segment of leg 5................................................................................................ C. expletus Neves &amp; Johnsson, 2008</p><p>- Third endopodal segment of leg 1 with five setae and two setae on the free segment of leg 5 ….. C. donghaensis Kim, 1996</p><p>11(4) Female antennule 9-segmented …....................................................................... 12</p><p>- Female antennule 10-segmented …..................................................................... 24</p><p>12 (5). Third exopodal segment of leg 4 with eight elements …...................................................... 13</p><p>- Third exopodal segment of leg 4 with nine elements...................................................... …14</p><p>13 (12) Free segment of female leg 5 longer than wide, male antennule 9-segmented …............... C. longipes Nicholls, 1944</p><p>- Free segment of female leg 5 wider than long, male antennule 10-segmented....................... C. acutus Kim 2007</p><p>14(12). Second endopodal segment of leg 1 with two setae …....................................................... 15</p><p>- Second endopodal segment of leg 1 with one seta …........................................................ 21</p><p>15(14). Maxillule outer lobe with three setae …........................................ C. brevifurcatus (Giesbrecht, 1895)</p><p>- Maxillule outer lobe with two setae …................................................................... 16</p><p>16(15). Maxillule inner lobe with one seta …............................................. C. paracapitalis Nicholls, 1944</p><p>- Maxillule inner lobe with more than one seta …............................................................ 17</p><p>17(16). Maxillule inner lobe with two setae …................................................................... 18</p><p>- Maxillule inner lobe with three setae ….................................................................. 20</p><p>18(17). Maxillule inner lobe with two setae and similar in length to outer lobe …........................................ 19</p><p>- Maxillule inner lobe with two setae and longer than outer lobe ….......... C. tanacredii Johnsson, Rocha &amp; Boyko, 2002</p><p>19(18). Antennal exopod bearing a single terminal seta …................................ C. gracilioides Ummerkutty, 1961</p><p>- Antennal exopod bearing two terminal setae …......................................... C. phyllogorgius sp. nov.</p><p>20(17). Maxillule inner lobe with three setae and much longer than outer lobe …................. C. brevicaudatus (Brady, 1910)</p><p>- Maxillule inner lobe with three setae and similar in length to outer lobe …............... C. madeirensis Johnsson, 2001</p><p>21(14). Third exopodal segment of leg 1 with eight elements (III+5) …............................ C. proximus Nicholls, 1944</p><p>- Third exopodal segment of leg 1 with seven elements (III+4) …............................................... 22</p><p>22(21). Third endopodal segment of leg 1 with five setae …....................................... C. gracilis Wilson, 1932</p><p>- Third endopodal segment of leg 1 with six setae …......................................................... 23</p><p>23(22). Third exopodal segment of leg 2 with III-6; third endopodal segment of leg 2 with 1-5...... … C. tenuis (Giesbrecht, 1895)</p><p>- Third exopodal segment of leg 2 with IV-5; third endopodal segment of leg 2 with 1-1+I-3 …................................................................................................... C. orientalis Ummerkutty, 1961</p><p>24(11). Third exopodal segment of leg 1 with eight elements (III-5) …................................................ 25</p><p>- Third exopodal segment of leg 1 with seven elements (III-4) …............................................... 26</p><p>25(24). Maxillule outer lobe with three setae; antennal exopod with two setae …........................ C. ascidius Kim, 1996</p><p>- Maxillule outer lobe with two setae; antennal exopod with one seta …........................ C. similis Nicholls, 1944</p><p>26(24). Siphon reaching between insertion of maxilla and maxilliped …........................ C. capitalis (Giesbrecht, 1895)</p><p>- Siphon reaching insertion of leg 1 …............................................... C. thorelli (Giesbrecht, 1895)</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D787811726381BFF63F9439D83F9E3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Farias, Amilcar;Neves, Elizabeth G.;Johnsson, Rodrigo	Farias, Amilcar, Neves, Elizabeth G., Johnsson, Rodrigo (2020): Two new species of Cryptopontius Giesbrecht, 1899 (Copepoda, Siphonostomatoida Artotrogidae) associated with invertebrates from Northeastern Brazil. Zootaxa 4810 (3): 481-494, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4810.3.5
