identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03D587F3FFF0D304FDB9D366FA9A96F0.text	03D587F3FFF0D304FDB9D366FA9A96F0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Habritella Girault & Dodd 1915	<div><p>Genus Habritella Girault &amp; Dodd, 1915</p><p>Habritella Girault &amp; Dodd, 1915 in Girault, 1915: 191 (type species: H. graciliventris Girault &amp; Dodd, 1915, by monotypy).</p><p>Cairnsia Bouček, 1988: 421–422 (type species: C. stylifera Bouček, 1988, by original designation and monotypy).</p><p>Ezgia Koçak &amp; Kemal, 2008: 3–7 (replacement name for Cairnsia Bouček, 1988), syn. nov.</p><p>Neocairnsia Darilmaz &amp; Özdikmen, 2009: 37–42 (unnecessary replacement name for Cairnsia Bouček, 1988).</p><p>Diagnosis</p><p>Clypeal margin moderately to deeply emarginate, hence appearing bidentate or bilobed (Figs 1C, 3C, 4C), rarely virtually straight (Fig. 2C); toruli above middle of face, hence scape usually reaching above level of vertex (Figs 1C, 3C, 4C); female antenna 11353 (Figs 1G, 2G, 3G, 4G), male antenna 11263 (Figs 1H, 2H, 3H, 4H); clava in both sexes more or less pointed, with a spicula or small terminal process (Figs 1H, 2G, 2H, 3H) or without (Figs 1G, 3G, 4G–H); pronotal collar much narrower than mesoscutum, anterior margin rounded, angled or very finely carinate; notauli incomplete; propodeum short on sides but with large reticulate nucha and sinuate plicae, without median carina or costula (Figs 1D, 2D, 3D, 4D); stigmal vein usually strongly capitate (Figs 2F, 3F, 4F); metasoma sessile, narrow (Figs 1E, 2E, 3E, 4E).</p><p>Redescription</p><p>BODY. Gracile, with at least some distinct metallic reflections (Figs 1A–B, 2A–B, 3A–B, 4A–B). Body setation at least partly whitish, conspicuous at least on the face (Figs 2C, 3C, 4C).</p><p>HEAD. Wider than high in frontal view, genae quite strongly converging and vertex not high (Figs 1C, 2C, 3C, 4C). Clypeus more or less well delimited (Figs 1C, 2C, 3C, 4C). Clypeal margin symmetric, usually moderately to strongly emarginate or incised in the middle hence appearing bidentate or bilobed (Figs 1C, 3C, 4C), or virtually straight (Fig. 2C). Tentorial pits absent. Scrobal depression at least slightly visible. Gena usually not hollowed at mouth corner (Figs 1C, 3C, 4C), but sometimes with large depression (Fig. 2C). Genal carina absent. Malar sulcus present as a fine line. Eyes normal to slightly enlarged. Temples distinct, strongly convergent. Occiput without carina.Antennal insertion clearly above middle of face, sometimes very high (Figs 1C, 3C). Antennal formula 11353 in female (Figs 1G, 2G, 3G, 4G) and 11263 in male (Figs 1H, 2H, 3H, 4H). Anelli transverse. Antennal scape normal. Female antennal clava with ventral area of micropilosity confined to distal segment, apex in both sexes more or less pointed, with a spicula or small terminal process (Figs 1H, 2G, 2H, 3H) or without (Figs 1G, 3G, 4G, 4H). Mandibles 4:3, normal (Fig. 4C) or slightly to distinctly enlarged (Figs 1C, 2C, 3C).</p><p>MESOSOMA. Convex. Pronotum short conical. Pronotal collar with anterior margin rounded, angled or very finely carinate. Mesoscutum short. Notauli incomplete, superficial. Axillae slightly advanced. Mesoscutum separated from scutellum by rather deep groove (Figs 1D, 4D). Scutellum convex. Frenal line absent. Dorsellum usually very short. Propodeum (Figs 1D, 2D, 3D, 4D) much narrower laterally than medially. Propodeal plicae sinuate and reaching nuchal sides. Median carina and costula absent. Nucha large, with almost parallel sides. Callus sparsely setose. Propodeal hind corners not prominent. Propodeal spiracles large, elongate, close to metanotum. Prepectus not carinate, about as long as tegula. Mesopleuron partly smooth. Mesosternum without transverse carina. Metapleuron with a distinct groove in posterior part. Legs slender. Hind coxa dorsally bare, fairly long. Hind tibia with one spur. Wings hyaline. Fore wing (Figs 1F, 2F, 3F, 4F) extensively bare basally. Ventral side of fore wing with at least one row of admarginal setae under marginal vein. Marginal vein slender. Stigmal vein shorter than both marginal and postmarginal veins. Stigma usually strongly capitate (Figs 2F, 3F, 4F), sometimes only moderately so (Fig. 1F). Postmarginal vein shorter than marginal vein.</p><p>METASOMA. Lanceolate in females, much narrower than mesosoma and longer than head plus mesosoma (Figs 1E, 2E, 3E, 4E). Short petiole concealed under nucha. All gastral tergites normal (Figs 2E, 4E); or one or more of gt1, 2 or 3 with their posterior margin medially emarginate or incised (Fig. 3E); or gt3 or 4 distinctly enlarged (Fig. 1E). Gt2 always much shorter than either gt1 or gt3. Cercal setae equal. Ovipositor sheaths short but visible in dorsal view.</p><p>Taxonomic comments</p><p>Bouček (1988: 235) separated females of Ezgia (= Cairnsia) from females of Habritella (males previously unknown for both genera) as follows:</p><p>“[...] Clava with asymmetrically placed awl-like spicula [...]; gastral tergites normal, dorsally collapsing, the third not larger than the fourth tergite …[...] Cairnsia gen. n.</p><p>– Clava normal, without spicula [...]; third tergite in female convex and greatly enlarged [...] so that it covers more than a third of gastral surface, margin of second tergite deeply excised in middle but the first angulately produced …[...] Habritella Girault &amp; Dodd ”.</p><p>In Table 1 the previously described species of Ezgia and Habritella, as well as the newly described species are compared regarding the characters listed above.</p><p>Table 1 shows these characters are not constant within the two genera and are grouped in various combinations within the six known species. Moreover, many other morphological features are shared by all these species and are rather uniform: the shape of clypeus (except in H. mandibulata sp. nov.); the level of toruli; the antennal formula and shape of funiculars; the shape of propodeum; the venation; and the general shape of metasoma. At the same time, the claval spicula present in the females of Ezgia stylifera (Bouček 1988: 486, fig. 735) and H. mandibulata (Fig. 2G) is much more developed than the small terminal process found in the males of H. africana sp. nov., H. mandibulata and H. noyesi sp. nov. The latter structure is somewhat similar to the ‘terminal button’ which is commonly found in many pteromalids. However, in these species this structure is more developed and narrower than a typical ‘terminal button’. As it is practically impossible to separate the above mentioned six species in two distinct genera due to the overlap of characters, Ezgia is regarded as a synonym of Habritella, syn. nov., and consequently its only species is transferred to the latter genus as Habritella stylifera comb. nov.</p><p>Key to the Afrotropical species of Habritella</p><p>1. Both sexes: gena hollowed near mouth corner (Fig. 2C); clypeus reticulate, well delimited laterally (Fig. 2C); clypeal margin without any median incision or emargination (Fig. 2C); mandibles very large (Fig. 2C); scape not reaching level of vertex (Fig. 2C). Female: claval apex with spicula (Fig. 2F); all gastral tergites normally developed, each with posterior margin entire (Fig. 2E). Male: clava with short spike-like terminal process (Figs 2H); metasoma brown, with a dorsal pale spot ... ...................................................................................................................... H. mandibulata sp. nov.</p><p>– Both sexes: gena not hollowed near mouth corner (Figs 1C, 3C, 4C); clypeus striate, not well delimited (Figs 1C, 3C, 4C); clypeal margin with median incision or emargination (Figs 1C, 3C, 4C); mandibles smaller than in alternative (Figs 1C, 3C, 4C); scape reaching above level of vertex (Figs 1C, 3C, 4C). Female: claval apex without spicula (Figs 1F, 3F, 4F); part of gastral tergites usually either enlarged or with posterior margin incised or emarginated (Figs 1E, 3E). Male: clava sometimes without spike-like terminal process (Fig. 4H); metasoma variable ................................ 2</p><p>2. Both sexes: clypeal margin with small lobes separated by shallow emargination (Fig. 4C); scutellum shorter than mesoscutum; toruli above centre of face but less high than in alternative (Fig. 4C); fore wing (Fig. 4F) densely setose, speculum smaller than in alternative, not reaching stigmal vein thus admarginal setae on ventral side of wing not easily visible; stigma very large, its height at least equal to minimum distance from stigma to PMV; fore and mid coxae not metallic (Fig. 4A–B). Female: all gastral tergites normally developed, each with its posterior margin entire (Fig. 4E); head in frontal view with contrasting colours, bright green below toruli and blackish above (Fig. 4C); metasoma mainly brown (Fig. 4E). Male: clava without terminal spike-like terminal process (Fig. 3H); metasoma brown, with a dorsal pale spot ........................................................ E. viridifrons sp. nov.</p><p>– Both sexes: clypeal margin with two large lobes separated by deep incision (Figs 1C, 3C); scutellum longer than mesoscutum; toruli much higher than centre of face (Figs 1C, 3C); fore wing (Figs 1F, 3F) sparsely setose, speculum large, reaching stigmal vein thus making admarginal setae on ventral side of wing easily visible; stigma sometimes smaller; all coxae metallic (Figs 1A–B, 3A). Female: at least one gastral tergite with posterior margin medially emarginate or incised, or distinctly enlarged (Figs 1E, 3E); head in frontal view without contrasting colours, gradually becoming darker above toruli (Figs 1C, 3C); metasoma bluish or violet (Figs 1E, 3E). Male: clava with short spike-like terminal process (Figs 1H, 3H); metasoma dark, without a dorsal pale spot ................................... 3</p><p>3. Both sexes: pronotal collar with anterior margin very finely carinate (Fig. 1A, G); hind femur dark, with some metallic reflections (Fig. 1A–B); stigma not very large, its height less than minimum distance from stigma to PMV (Fig. 1F). Female: gt1 and gt3 with their posterior margin not emarginate or incised (Fig. 1E); gt4 distinctly enlarged, much larger than gt3 (Fig. 1E); metasoma mostly violet (Fig. 1E); body setation mostly light brown, not conspicuous (Fig. 1A, C). Male: flagellar setae erect (Fig. 1H) .............................................................................. H. africana sp. nov.</p><p>– Both sexes: pronotal collar with anterior margin rounded, not carinate (Fig. 3A–B); hind femur yellowish-brown, without metallic reflections (Fig. 3A–B); stigma very large, its height about equal to minimum distance from stigma to PMV (Fig. 3F). Female: gt1 and gt3 with posterior margin emarginate or incised, respectively (Fig. 3E); gt4 not distinctly enlarged, not larger than gt3 (Fig. 3E); metasoma mostly blue (Fig. 3E); body setation white, conspicuous (Fig. 3A, C). Male: flagellar setae depressed (Fig. 3H) .......................................................................... H. noyesi sp. nov.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D587F3FFF0D304FDB9D366FA9A96F0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Mitroiu, Mircea-Dan	Mitroiu, Mircea-Dan (2022): The Afrotropical species of Habritella Girault & Dodd (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). European Journal of Taxonomy 813 (1): 155-172, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.813.1743, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2022.813.1743
03D587F3FFF7D307FDE0D05EFED497BC.text	03D587F3FFF7D307FDE0D05EFED497BC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Habritella africana Mitroiu 2022	<div><p>Habritella africana sp. nov.</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 5A13C957-2030-44B9-9691-4BD4B4974928</p><p>Fig. 1</p><p>Diagnosis</p><p>Both sexes</p><p>Gena not hollowed at mouth corner (Fig. 1C). Clypeus striate, not well delimited. Clypeal margin with two large lobes separated by deep incision (Fig. 1C). Mandibles not unusually large (Fig. 1C). Pronotal collar with anterior margin very finely carinate (Fig. 1A, G). Scutellum longer than mesoscutum. Toruli much higher than centre of face (Fig. 1C). Fore wing (Fig. 1F) sparsely setose, speculum large, reaching stigmal vein thus making admarginal setae on ventral side of wing easily visible. Stigma not very large, its height less than minimum distance from stigma to PMV. All coxae metallic (Fig. 1A–B). Hind femur dark, with metallic reflections (Fig. 1A–B).</p><p>Female</p><p>Claval apex without spicula (Fig. 1G). Metasoma (Fig. 1E) with gt1 and gt3 with their posterior margin not emarginate or incised; gt4 distinctly enlarged, much larger than gt3 (Fig. 1E). Head in frontal view without contrasting colours, gradually becoming darker above toruli (Fig. 1C). Metasoma mostly violet (Fig. 1E). Body setation mostly light brown, not conspicuous (Fig. 1A–C).</p><p>Male</p><p>Flagellar setae erect (Fig. 1H). Clava with very short spike-like terminal process (Fig. 1H). Metasoma dark, without a dorsal pale spot.</p><p>Etymology</p><p>The specific epithet refers to this being the first record of the genus in the Afrotropical region.</p><p>Type material</p><p>Holotype TOGO • ♀; “Togo: 10 km NW Kpaliné, 17.xii.1988, J. S. Noyes ”; NHMUK.</p><p>Allotype TOGO • ♂; same collection data as for holotype; NHMUK.</p><p>Additional paratype TOGO • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; NHMUK .</p><p>Description</p><p>Female holotype</p><p>BODY LENGTH. 1.4 mm.</p><p>COLOUR. Head (Fig. 1C) blue green becoming bluish-black above toruli, including vertex and occiput. Eyes and ocelli dark brown. Antenna (Fig. 1G) reddish-brown, pedicel and flagellum dorsally slightly darker. Mandibles reddish-brown, teeth darker. Mesosoma bluish-black (Fig. 1A, D). Coxae as mesosoma. Trochanters, tibiae and tarsi except distal segment reddish-brown. Fore and mid femora brown, hind femur dark brown, with metallic reflections (Fig. 1A). Distal tarsal segment brown. Wings hyaline (Fig. 1F). Tegulae and venation brown. Metasoma mostly violet, with some blue reflections (Fig. 1E). Body setation mostly light brown, not conspicuous (Fig. 1A, C).</p><p>HEAD. Reticulate except clypeal region. Gena not hollowed at mouth corner (Fig. 1C). Clypeus not well delimited, striate. Clypeal margin with two large lobes separated by deep incision (Fig. 1C). Mandibles not unusually large (Fig. 1C). Toruli much higher than centre of face. Scrobes fairly deep. Scape reaching above level of vertex (Fig. 1C). Anelli transverse, all five funicular segments longer than wide, with moderately long setae. Claval apex without spicula (Fig. 1G). Relative measurements: head L: 25, W: 52, H: 42; eye H: 24, L: 16; POL: 11; OOL: 11; malar space: 11; scape L: 18, W: 2.5; pedicel L: 5.5, W: 3.5; pedicel plus flagellum L: 48; fu1 L: 6, W: 4.5; fu5 L: 5.5, W: 4.5; clava L: 13, W: 6.</p><p>MESOSOMA. Pronotal collar uniformly reticulate, anterior margin very finely carinate (Fig. 1A, G). Mesoscutum reticulate. Notauli barely visible among reticulation, occupying less than half the length of mesoscutum. Scutellum as coarsely reticulate as mesoscutum, frenal area not delimited (Fig. 1D). Dorsellum very short, groove-like (Fig. 1D). Propodeal median area more superficially reticulate than scutellum, laterally delimited by sinuate plicae reaching nucha. Posterior part of nucha mainly smooth (Fig. 1D). Central part of prepectus finely reticulate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 1B) with two reticulate areas: a large elongate one in anterior part, and an oval, much smaller one, in posterior part; adjacent areas smooth. Metapleuron finely reticulate, separated from propodeal callus by deep groove. Fore wing (Fig. 1F) with basal cell, including basal vein, bare. Costal cell with an irregular line of setae in distal half. Disc sparsely setose. Speculum large, gradually narrowing and reaching stigmal vein. Admarginal setae on ventral side of wing in one regular row. Stigmal height much shorter than minimum distance from stigma to PMV (Fig. 1F). Relative measurements: mesosoma L: 51, W: 40, H: 34; mesoscutum L: 17, W: 40; scutellum L: 22, W: 21; propodeum L: 10; fore wing L: 100, W: 48; MV: 20; SV: 11; PMV: 16; stigma height: 4; distance from stigma to PMV: 6.</p><p>METASOMA (Fig. 1E). Acute at both ends, not collapsing dorsally. Gt1 greatly produced posteriorly, its hind margin entire. Gt3 with posterior margin entire. Gt4 greatly enlarged, much larger than gt3. Relative measurements: metasoma L: 74, W: 30; gt1 L: 18, W: 13; gt2 L: 2, W: 15; gt3 L: 7, W: 25; gt4 L: 24, W: 30; gt5 L: 6, W: 25; gt6 L: 5, W: 20; syntergum L: 10, W: 14.</p><p>Male allotype</p><p>Differs from the female holotype mainly in the following. Body length: 1.25 mm. Metasoma uniformly dark brown, with some blue-green metallic reflections mainly on gt1. Antenna 11263. Flagellar setae slightly longer, denser and more erect (Fig. 1H). Clava with very short spike-like terminal process (Fig. 1H). MV 1.5× SV. Stigma larger (Fig. 1B). Metasoma much narrower anteriorly than posteriorly, distinctly shorter than head plus mesosoma, distal tergites partly retracted. None of the tergites enlarged. Metasoma L: 52, W: 25.</p><p>Variation</p><p>Females</p><p>Body length: 1.4–1.6 mm. POL 1.0–1.1 × OOL. MV 1.6–1.8 × SV. Metasoma length 2.4–2.5× width.</p><p>Distribution</p><p>Togo.</p><p>Hosts</p><p>Unknown.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D587F3FFF7D307FDE0D05EFED497BC	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Mitroiu, Mircea-Dan	Mitroiu, Mircea-Dan (2022): The Afrotropical species of Habritella Girault & Dodd (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). European Journal of Taxonomy 813 (1): 155-172, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.813.1743, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2022.813.1743
03D587F3FFF5D30AFDCFD786FED49792.text	03D587F3FFF5D30AFDCFD786FED49792.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Habritella mandibulata Mitroiu 2022	<div><p>Habritella mandibulata sp. nov.</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: A305430B-C45C-4F2C-8DD9-AA23E48C6D77</p><p>Fig. 2</p><p>Diagnosis</p><p>Both sexes</p><p>Gena with large hollow at mouth corner (Fig. 2C). Clypeus reticulate, well delimited laterally. Clypeal margin without any median incision (Fig. 2C). Mandibles very large (Fig. 2C). Pronotal collar with anterior margin rounded, not carinate (Fig. 2A). Scutellum about equal to mesoscutum. Toruli above centre of face, although not very high (Fig. 2C). Fore wing (Fig. 2F) densely setose, speculum smaller, not reaching stigmal vein thus admarginal setae on ventral side of wing not easily visible. Stigma very large, its height at least equal to minimum distance from stigma to PMV. Fore and mid coxae not metallic (Fig. 2A–B). Hind femur yellowish-brown.</p><p>Female</p><p>Clava with a terminal spicula (Fig. 2G). All gastral tergites normally developed, each with posterior margin entire (Fig. 2E). Head in frontal view without contrasting colours, gradually becoming darker above toruli (Fig. 2C). Metasoma mostly dark brown (Fig. 2E). Body setation dirty white, conspicuous (Fig. 2A, C).</p><p>Male</p><p>Flagellar setae erect (Fig. 2H). Clava with very short spike-like terminal process (Fig. 2H). Metasoma dark, with a dorsal pale spot.</p><p>Etymology</p><p>The specific epithet is an indication to the unusually large mandibles of this species.</p><p>Type material</p><p>Holotype SOUTH AFRICA • ♀; “S. Africa. R. E. Turner. Brit. Mus. 1921-476”; “ Mossel Bay, Cape Province. 1-14.xi.1921 ”; NHMUK.</p><p>Allotype SOUTH AFRICA • ♂; “S. Africa. R. E. Turner. Brit. Mus. 1922-67”; “ Mossel Bay, Cape Province. January 1922 ”; NHMUK.</p><p>Additional paratypes SOUTH AFRICA • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; NHMUK • 1 ♀; “S. Africa. R. E. Turner. Brit. Mus. 1922-2”; “ Mossel Bay, Cape Province. 18-30.xi.1921 ”; “ Stiloclava nov. gen. ” [Bouček’s handwriting]; NHMUK .</p><p>Description</p><p>Female holotype</p><p>BODY LENGTH. 2.3 mm.</p><p>COLOUR. Head (Fig. 2C) olive green getting blackish above toruli, including vertex and occiput. Eyes and ocelli dark brown. Antenna (Fig. 2G) with scape reddish-brown except whitish base, pedicel and flagellum reddish-brown except dark brown clava. Mandibles reddish-brown, teeth darker. Mesosoma dorsally dark olive green, laterally bluish-black (Fig. 2A, D). Coxae reddish-brown, hind coxa slightly darker on dorsal side. Trochanters, femora, tibiae and tarsi reddish-brown, except distal tarsal segment darker (Fig. 2A). Wings hyaline (Fig. 2F). Tegula reddish brown, venation brown. Metasoma dark brown, with some bluish reflections on gt1 (Fig. 1E). Body setation dirty white, conspicuous (Fig. 2A, C).</p><p>HEAD. Reticulate except clypeal region. Gena hollowed at mouth corner (Fig. 2C). Clypeus reticulate, not well delimited in upper part, but very well delimited laterally. Clypeal margin medially slightly produced and virtually straight (Fig. 2C). Mandibles very large, 3:3 (Fig. 2C). Toruli higher than centre of face. Scrobes fairly deep. Scape reaching level of vertex (Fig. 2C). Anelli transverse, all five funicular segments longer than wide, with moderately long setae. Claval apex with spicula (Fig. 2G). Relative measurements: head L: 26, W: 62, H: 50; eye H: 24, L: 19; POL: 10; OOL: 13; malar space: 21; scape L: 22, W: 4; pedicel L: 5.5, W: 3.5; pedicel plus flagellum L: 55; fu1 L: 6.5, W: 5; fu5 L: 5, W: 5; clava L (without spicula): 11, W: 6.5.</p><p>MESOSOMA. Pronotal collar uniformly reticulate, anterior margin rounded (Fig. 2A). Mesoscutum reticulate. Notauli clearly visible, occupying about half the length of mesoscutum. Scutellum as coarsely reticulate as mesoscutum, frenal area not delimited (Fig. 2D). Dorsellum very short, groovelike (Fig. 2D). Propodeal median area about as coarsely reticulate as scutellum, laterally delimited by sinuate plicae reaching nucha. Posterior part of nucha reticulate (Fig. 2D). Central part of prepectus finely reticulate. Mesopleuron finely reticulate except for smooth triangular area under hind wing base (Fig. 2A). Mesepisternum with small depression before mid coxa. Metapleuron finely reticulate, with small depression in lower part, separated from propodeal callus by deep groove. Fore wing (Fig. 2F) with basal cell, including basal vein, bare. Costal cell with two irregular lines of setae. Disc densely setose. Speculum moderate, reaching to proximal end of marginal vein. Admarginal setae on ventral side of wing in three irregular rows under marginal vein. Stigmal height much longer than minimum distance from stigma to PMV (Fig. 2F). Relative measurements: mesosoma L: 65, W: 43, H: 42; mesoscutum L: 23, W: 43; scutellum L: 25, W: 26; propodeum L: 15; fore wing L: 127, W: 57; MV: 30; SV: 14; PMV: 19; stigma height: 8; distance from stigma to PMV: 5.5.</p><p>METASOMA (Fig. 2E). Lanceolate, dorsally collapsing. Gt1 slightly produced posteriorly, none of the other gastral tergites enlarged or medially incised. Relative measurements: metasoma L: 100, W: 39; gt1 L: 22, W: 30; gt2 L: 6, W: 36; gt3 L: 12, W: 39; gt4 L: 10, W: 38; gt5 L: 15, W: 34; gt6 L: 18, W: 26; syntergum L: 11, W: 11.</p><p>Male allotype</p><p>Differs from the female holotype mainly in the following. Body length: 2.1 mm. Metasoma with pale spot in basal half. Antenna 11263, fu1 distinctly smaller than fu2. Flagellar setae longer, denser and more erect (Fig. 2H). Clava with very short spike-like terminal process (Fig. 2H). Metasoma oval, distinctly shorter than head plus mesosoma, distal tergites partly retracted. Metasoma L: 70, W: 32.</p><p>Variation</p><p>Females</p><p>Body length: 2.30–2.75 mm. MV 2.10–2.25 × SV. Metasoma length 2.5–3.5× width. The metasoma is slightly distorted in the holotype hence appearing wider than normal.</p><p>Distribution</p><p>South Africa.</p><p>Hosts</p><p>Unknown.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D587F3FFF5D30AFDCFD786FED49792	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Mitroiu, Mircea-Dan	Mitroiu, Mircea-Dan (2022): The Afrotropical species of Habritella Girault & Dodd (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). European Journal of Taxonomy 813 (1): 155-172, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.813.1743, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2022.813.1743
03D587F3FFF8D30DFD15D7FDFED49777.text	03D587F3FFF8D30DFD15D7FDFED49777.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Habritella noyesi Mitroiu 2022	<div><p>Habritella noyesi sp. nov.</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 3F5CF746-5DF6-4236-8645-2BF948713EC7</p><p>Fig. 3</p><p>Diagnosis</p><p>Both sexes</p><p>Gena not hollowed at mouth corner (Fig. 3C). Clypeus striate, not well delimited. Clypeal margin with two large lobes separated by deep incision (Fig. 3C). Mandibles not unusually large (Fig. 3C). Pronotal collar with anterior margin rounded, not carinate (Fig. 3A–B). Scutellum longer than mesoscutum. Toruli much higher than centre of face (Fig. 3C). Fore wing (Fig. 3F) sparsely setose, speculum large, reaching stigmal vein thus making admarginal setae on ventral side of wing easily visible. Stigma very large, its height about equal to minimum distance from stigma to PMV. All coxae metallic (Fig. 3A). Hind femur yellowish-brown, without metallic reflections (Fig. 3A–B).</p><p>Female</p><p>Claval apex without spicula (Fig. 3G). Metasoma (Fig. 3E) with gt1 and gt3 with posterior margin emarginate or incised, respectively; gt4 distinctly enlarged, much larger than gt3. Head in frontal view without contrasting colours, gradually becoming darker above toruli (Fig. 3C). Metasoma mostly blue (Fig. 3E). Body setation white, conspicuous (Fig. 3A, C).</p><p>Male</p><p>Flagellar setae depressed. Clava with short spike-like terminal process (Fig. 3H). Metasoma dark, without a dorsal pale spot.</p><p>Etymology</p><p>This species is named after the outstanding chalcidologist John Noyes, the collector of the type specimens.</p><p>Type material</p><p>Holotype TOGO • ♀; “ Togo: 10 km NW Kpaliné, 17.xii.1988, J. S. Noyes ”; NHMUK.</p><p>Allotype TOGO • ♂; same collection data as for holotype; NHMUK.</p><p>Additional paratypes TOGO • 6 ♀♀, 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; NHMUK .</p><p>Description</p><p>Female holotype</p><p>BODY LENGTH. 2.1 mm.</p><p>COLOUR. Head (Fig. 3C) green becoming dark bluish above toruli, including vertex and occiput. Eyes dark brown, ocelli brown. Scape, pedicel and anelli reddish-brown, funicle and clava brown (Fig. 3G). Mandibles reddish-brown, teeth darker. Mesosoma bluish-green (Fig. 3A, D). Coxae as mesosoma. Trochanters, tibiae and tarsi except distal segment reddish-brown. Femora and distal tarsal segment darker (Fig. 3A). Wings hyaline (Fig. 3F). Tegulae and venation reddish-brown. Metasoma steel blue (Fig. 3E). Body setation white, conspicuous (Fig. 3A, C).</p><p>HEAD. Reticulate except clypeal region. Gena not hollowed at mouth corner (Fig. 3C). Clypeus not well delimited, striate. Clypeal margin with two large lobes separated by deep incision (Fig. 3C). Mandibles not unusually large (Fig. 3C). Toruli much higher than centre of face. Scrobes fairly deep. Scape reaching above level of vertex (Fig. 3C). Anelli transverse, all five funicular segments longer than wide, with moderately long setae. Claval apex without spicula (Fig. 3G). Relative measurements: head L: 35, W: 68, H: 50; eye H: 32, L: 25; POL: 15; OOL: 11; malar space: 15; scape L: 23, W: 5; pedicel L: 6, W: 4.5; pedicel plus flagellum L: 70; fu1 L: 10, W: 5; fu5 L: 8, W: 5; clava L: 17, W: 7.</p><p>MESOSOMA. Pronotal collar uniformly reticulate, anterior margin rounded off into vertical neck (Fig. 3A). Mesoscutum reticulate. Notauli barely visible among reticulation, occupying about half the length of mesoscutum. Scutellum as coarsely reticulate as mesoscutum, frenal area not delimited (Fig. 3D). Dorsellum very short, groove-like (Fig. 3D). Propodeal median area more superficially reticulate than scutellum, laterally delimited by sinuate plicae reaching nucha. Posterior part of nucha finely striate (Fig. 3D). Central part of prepectus finely reticulate. Mesopleuron with two reticulate areas: a large elongate one in anterior part, and an oval, much smaller one, in posterior part; adjacent areas smooth (Fig. 3A). Metapleuron finely reticulate, separated from propodeal callus by deep groove. Fore wing (Fig. 3F) with basal cell, including basal vein, bare except one or two scattered setae. Costal cell with an irregular line of setae in distal half. Disc sparsely setose. Speculum large, gradually narrowing and reaching stigmal vein. Admarginal setae on ventral side of wing in one irregular row. Stigmal height as long as distance from stigma to PMV (Fig. 3F). Relative measurements: mesosoma L: 70, W: 55, H: 47; mesoscutum L: 26, W: 55; scutellum L: 30, W: 30; propodeum L: 16; fore wing L: 130, W: 65; MV: 27; SV: 15; PMV: 20; stigma H: 7; distance from stigma to PMV: 7.</p><p>METASOMA (Fig. 3E). Acute at both ends, slightly collapsing dorsally. Gt1 greatly produced posteriorly, its hind margin medially emarginate. Gt3 with posterior margin medially incised. Gt4 not unusually enlarged, not larger than gt3. Relative measurements: metasoma L: 110, W: 39; gt1 L: 22, W: 25; gt2 L: 9, W: 31; gt3 L: 15, W: 39; gt4 L: 15, W: 37; gt5 L: 12, W: 31; gt6 L: 15, W: 21; syntergum L: 14, W: 5.</p><p>Male allotype</p><p>Differs from the female holotype mainly in the following. Body length: 1.5 mm. Metasoma uniformly dark brown, with some blue-green metallic reflections mainly on gt1. Body setation mostly darker, less conspicuous. Antenna 11263. Flagellar setae slightly denser, but not more erect than those of the female (Fig. 3H). Clava with short spike-like terminal process (Fig. 3H). MV 1.6 × SV. Metasoma much narrower anteriorly than posteriorly, distinctly shorter than head plus mesosoma, distal tergites partly retracted. Posterior margins of all tergites virtually straight. Metasoma L: 73, W: 22.</p><p>Variation</p><p>Females</p><p>Body length: 1.75–2.10 mm. Hind femur from yellowish to yellowish-brown. Metasoma sometimes with violet reflections. POL 1.2–1.4 × OOL. MV 1.6–1.8 × SV. Metasoma length 2.8–3.5× width.</p><p>Males</p><p>Body length: 1.2–1.5 mm. Hind femur from yellowish to yellowish-brown. Shape and length of metasoma variable according to degree of collapsation.</p><p>Distribution</p><p>Togo.</p><p>Hosts</p><p>Unknown.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D587F3FFF8D30DFD15D7FDFED49777	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Mitroiu, Mircea-Dan	Mitroiu, Mircea-Dan (2022): The Afrotropical species of Habritella Girault & Dodd (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). European Journal of Taxonomy 813 (1): 155-172, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.813.1743, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2022.813.1743
03D587F3FFFFD310FDFCD7DEFED49617.text	03D587F3FFFFD310FDFCD7DEFED49617.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Habritella viridifrons Mitroiu 2022	<div><p>Habritella viridifrons sp. nov.</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 21C5C9E3-43B1-4E8D-B554-ED451B1CD633</p><p>Fig. 4</p><p>Diagnosis</p><p>Both sexes</p><p>Gena not hollowed at mouth corner (Fig. 4C). Clypeus striate, not well delimited. Clypeal margin with small lobes separated by shallow emargination (Fig. 4C). Mandibles not unusually large (Fig. 4C). Pronotal collar with anterior margin slightly raised but not carinate. Scutellum shorter than mesoscutum. Toruli above centre of face, although not very high (Fig. 4C). Fore wing (Fig. 4F) densely setose, speculum smaller, not reaching stigmal vein thus admarginal setae on ventral side of wing not easily visible. Stigma very large, its height at least equal to minimum distance from stigma to PMV. Fore and mid coxae not metallic (Fig. 4A–B). Hind femur yellowish-brown.</p><p>Female Claval apex without spicula (Fig. 4G). Metasoma with all gastral tergites normally developed, each with its posterior margin entire (Fig. 4E). Head in frontal view with contrasting colours, bright green below toruli and blackish above (Fig. 4C). Metasoma mainly brown (Fig. 4E). Body setation light brown to whitish, not conspicuous except on the head (Fig. 4C).</p><p>Male</p><p>Flagellar setae erect. Clava without spike-like terminal process (Fig. 4H). Metasoma brown, with a dorsal pale spot.</p><p>Material examined</p><p>Holotype D.R. CONGO • ♀; “Congo Belge, P. N. G., Miss. H. De Saeger, II/hd/9, 24-vi-1952, H. De Saeger. 3669”; RMCA.</p><p>Allotype D.R. CONGO • ♂; same collection data as for holotype; RMCA.</p><p>Additional paratypes D.R. CONGO • 15 ♀♀, 8 ♂♂; same collection data as for holotype; RMCA .</p><p>Etymology</p><p>The specific epithet refers to the specific head colour.</p><p>Description</p><p>Female holotype</p><p>BODY LENGTH. 2.1 mm.</p><p>COLOUR. Head (Fig. 4C) bright green except bluish-black genae, scrobes, vertex and occiput. Eyes dark brown, ocelli reddish-brown. Scape and pedicel reddish-yellow, flagellum reddish-brown (Fig. 4G). Mandibles reddish-yellow, teeth reddish-brown. Mesosoma dark blue except blue green lateral corners of mesoscutum, axillae, lateral sides of scutellum, and anterior margin of mesopleuron (Fig. 4A, D). Fore and mid coxae reddish-yellow, hind coxa dorsally brown, with weak metallic reflections. Trochanters, tibiae and tarsi except distal segment reddish-yellow. Femora and last tarsal segment yellowish-brown (Fig. 4A). Wings hyaline (Fig. 4F). Tegula reddish-yellow, venation yellowish-brown. Metasoma brown, with some weak bluish reflections (Fig. 4E). Body setation light brown to whitish, not conspicuous except on lower face (Fig. 4C).</p><p>HEAD. Reticulate except clypeal region. Gena not hollowed at mouth corner (Fig. 4C). Clypeus not well delimited, striate. Clypeal margin with short lobes separated by broad emargination (Fig. 4C). Mandibles not unusually large (Fig. 4C). Toruli higher than centre of face (Fig. 4C). Scrobes shallow. Scape reaching above level of vertex (Fig. 4C). Anelli transverse, all five funicular segments longer than wide, with moderately long setae. Claval apex without spicula (Fig. 4G). Relative measurements: head L: 25, W: 62, H: 47; eye H: 25, L: 20; POL: 13; OOL: 10; malar space: 16; scape L: 26, W: 4.5; pedicel L: 7.5, W: 3.5; pedicel plus flagellum L: 61; fu1 L: 7, W: 4.5; fu5 L: 7, W: 4.5; clava L: 16, W: 5.</p><p>MESOSOMA. Pronotal collar with reticulation becoming shallower posteriorly, anterior margin slightly raised but not carinate. Mesoscutum reticulate. Notauli barely visible among reticulation, occupying almost half the length of mesoscutum. Scutellum as coarsely reticulate as mesoscutum, frenal area not delimited (Fig. 4D). Dorsellum very short, as a smooth band (Fig. 4D). Propodeal median area more coarsely reticulate than scutellum, laterally delimited by sinuate plicae reaching nucha. Posterior part of nucha striate reticulate (Fig. 4D). Central part of prepectus finely reticulate. Mesopleuron reticulate except for smooth triangular area under hind wing base (Fig. 4A). Mesepisternum with small depression before mid coxa. Metapleuron finely reticulate, with small depression in lower part, separated from propodeal callus by deep groove. Fore wing (Fig. 4F) with basal cell bare, basal vein with a few setae. Costal cell with two irregular lines of setae in distal half. Disc densely setose. Speculum moderate, reaching to proximal end of marginal vein. Admarginal setae on ventral side of wing in two irregular rows under marginal vein. Stigmal height slightly longer than distance from stigma to PMV (Fig. 4F). Relative measurements: mesosoma L: 66, W: 51, H: 49; mesoscutum L: 28, W: 51; scutellum L: 25, W: 29; propodeum L: 12; fore wing L: 145, W: 64; MV: 33; SV: 17; PMV: 25; stigma H: 8; distance from stigma to PMV: 7.</p><p>METASOMA (Fig. 4E). With sides almost parallel for about 3/4 of its length, strongly collapsing dorsally. Gt1 slightly produced posteriorly, none of the other gastral tergites enlarged or medially incised. Relative measurements: metasoma L: 133, W: 32; gt1 L: 23, W: 24; gt2 L: 3, W: 25; gt3 L: 20, W: 28; gt4 L: 20, W: 32; gt5 L: 20, W: 32; gt6 L: 20, W: 30; syntergum L: 12, W: 18.</p><p>Male allotype</p><p>Differs from the female holotype mainly in the following. Body length: 1.9 mm. Metasoma with pale spot in basal half.Antenna 11263. Flagellar setae as in female, i.e., erect, but somewhat denser (Fig. 4H). Petiole more visible. Metasoma about equal to head plus mesosoma, posterior end more blunt, distal tergites partly retracted. Metasoma L: 95, W: 38.</p><p>Variation</p><p>Females</p><p>Body length: 2.00–2.25. mm. Greenish areas of mesosoma more or less extended. Stigmal height from equal to slightly longer than maximum distance between stigma and PMV. POL 1.3–1.5 × OOL. MV 1.8–2.0 × SV. Metasoma length 4.0–4.2 × width.</p><p>Males</p><p>Body length: 1.5–2.0 mm. Greenish areas of mesosoma more or less extended. Shape and size of metasoma whitish spot variable. Shape and length of metasoma variable according to degree of collapsation of gastral tergites.</p><p>Distribution</p><p>D.R. Congo.</p><p>Hosts</p><p>Unknown.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D587F3FFFFD310FDFCD7DEFED49617	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Mitroiu, Mircea-Dan	Mitroiu, Mircea-Dan (2022): The Afrotropical species of Habritella Girault & Dodd (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). European Journal of Taxonomy 813 (1): 155-172, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.813.1743, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2022.813.1743
