identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03D387AC711C8744FE35FA50FD70FA2A.text	03D387AC711C8744FE35FA50FD70FA2A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hovops Benoit 1968	<div><p>Genus Hovops Benoit, 1968</p> <p>Type species: Selenops pusillus Simon, 1887.</p> <p>Diagnosis: The revision of a considerable number of specimens of this genus makes it possible for us to add new diagnostic characters to those already proposed by Benoit (1968). This genus can be distinguished from other selenopids by the presence of iridescent rounded or sub-triangular scale-like hairs covering the entire body below short setae; prosoma wider than long; AME&gt; PME to nearly double in some species (Fig. 1E); ALE similar or larger than PME; PLE almost 1.5× larger than the AME and sternum longer than wide, not circular (Fig. 2C). Fe I–III with d1.1.0 spines, tibiae and metatarsi with ventral spines that can be paired or not. When paired, with Tib I–II with v2.2.2 or v2.2.1 and Mt I–II with v2.2.0 (Fig. 1M); when unpaired, Tib I-II with 9 (4 proventral and 5 retroventral), 10 (4-6) or 11 (4-7) ventral spines (Fig. 1N), and Mt I-II with v2.2.2, in few cases v2.2.0 paired spines. Males usually with more spines than females. Second SDLU RI OHJV ORQJHU WKDQ IRXUWK; ¿UVW XVXDOO\ VKRUWHVW. &amp;KHOLFHUDH ZLWK ³ RU 4 SURODWHUDO and 2–4 retrolateral teeth on cheliceral furrow, uncommonly 3 or 2 teeth. Palp of male with a large and twisted (Fig. 2G), or short and curved, sclerotized RTA (Figs 3B, 4C); embolus long and slender; broad, thickly sclerotized and hyper-developed sickle-shaped conductor, with sharp or hooked terminal ends, and single and large MA, surrounded by broad-based PMA (Figs 2H, 3D, 4D). Epigyne of female with MF as a plate (Fig. 2E), in some cases as a shallow mesial depression (Fig. 4E), with distinct and usually cordiform-shaped lateral lobes, broadly separated (Figs 2E, 4E) or near to posterior midline (Figs 3F, 5D); epigyne with shallow secondary epigynal pockets (Fig. 2E) and complex spermathecae. Posterior median spinnerets with three major ampullate spigots and posterior lateral spinnerets with two (Fig. 1F).</p> <p>Comparison: Hovops can be distinguished from other genera of Selenopidae by the presence of iridescent scale-like hairs covering the entire body (Fig. 5C); the presence of AME&gt; PME (Figs 1A–E); the particular formula of the spines on the femur, anterior tibiae and metatarsi (Figs 1G–N); the oval sternum (Fig. 2C); and the number of major ampullate spigots on the spinnerets.</p> <p>The males of Hovops share with those of Selenops, Garcorops and Siamspinops WKH SUHVHQFH RI D ORQJ DQG ¿OLIRUP HPEROXV FRYHULQJ DOPRVW RQH WXUQ RI WKH EXOE, EXW differ from them by the shape of the conductor and the MA (Figs 2H, 3B, 4D). The presence of a PMA (Fig. 2H) is shared with some species of Anyphops and Garcorops, but in Hovops this is smaller, sub-circular, high and sclerotized. The presence of a welldeveloped dorsal cymbial scopulae (Fig. 2G) is shared with some species of Anyphops, while the presence of a basal cymbial concavity (Fig. 2H) is observed not only in that genus, but also in Garcorops.</p> <p>The general shape of the female epigyne, usually as a medial sclerite with distinguishable lateral lobes, is shared with Selenops females, and some species of Garcorops and Anyphops. The presence of secondary epigynal pockets (Fig. 2E) is a character that also appears in females of Siamspinops and Selenops, but in Hovops they are generally in the middle portion of the epigyne as in Siamspinops. The presence of anterior copulatory openings (Fig. 2E) is shared with Garcorops, and some species of Selenops and Anyphops, but the shape of the long, wide and usually well developed copulatory ducts (Fig. 2F) is characteristic of Hovops females.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D387AC711C8744FE35FA50FD70FA2A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Corronca, José Antonio;Rodríguez Artigas, Sandra M.	Corronca, José Antonio, Rodríguez Artigas, Sandra M. (2011): New species of the Madagascan genus Hovops Benoit, 1968 (Araneae: Selenopidae), with a description of the H. madagascariensis PDOH DQG DQ LGHQWL ¿ FDWLRQ NH \. African Invertebrates 52 (2): 295, DOI: 10.5733/afin.052.0206, URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.5733/afin.052.0206
03D387AC711A8746FDDBFA31FD54FA22.text	03D387AC711A8746FDDBFA31FD54FA22.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hovops betsileo Corronca & Rodríguez Artigas 2011	<div><p>Hovops betsileo sp. n.</p> <p>Fig. 2</p> <p>(W\PRORJ\: 7KH VSHFL¿F QDPH LV GHGLFDWHG WR WKH %HWVLOHR HWKQLF JURXS OLYLQJ LQ WKH high mountains of Madagascar, the third largest ethnic group in numbers. The term means “those who are not overcome”.</p> <p>Diagnosis: H. betsileo sp. n. differs from its congeners by the particular shape of the sigmoid RTA (Figs 2G, 2H), and the VTA with a notch in the middle of the ventral border (Fig. 2G). AM (Fig. 2H) similar to that of H. lidiae sp. n. (Fig. 3B), but in the latter species it is more rounded and shorter than in H. betsileo sp. n. Females are dis- WLQJXLVKHG E\ WKH VKDSH RI WKH PLGGOH ¿HOG ()LJ. ƻ(), WKH ZLGH VHSDUDWLRQ DQG WKH VKDSH of the lateral lobes of the epigyne (Fig. 2F).</p> <p>Description:</p> <p>Male.</p> <p>Total body length 5.00. Prosoma 2.49 long, 2.93 wide. Opisthosoma 2.51 long, 1.89 wide. Eye diameter and interdistances: AME 0.14, ALE 0.11, PME 0.11, PLE 0.23, AME – AME 0.20, AME – ALE 0.39, AME – PME 0.14, PME – PME 0.73, PME –PLE 0.32, PLE–PLE 1.47, ALE – ALE 1.22. Leg formula: 2314. Leg measurements: I – Fe ³.4o, 3DW+7LE 4.Ϭo, 0W ƻ.9o, 7D l.³o, WRWDO lƻ.ƻo;,, ± 4.³o, ƽ.ƽo, ³.Ϭo, l.Ϭo, WRWDO lƽ.oo; III – 4.10, 4.40, 2.90, 1.30, total 12.70; IV – 3.40, 4.10, 2.90, 1.30, total 11.70. Leg spination: Fe I d1.1.0, rt1.1.0, II d1.1.0, pr1.1.0, rt1.1.0, III d1.1.0, rt1.1.0, IV d1.1.0; Tib I v1.1.0.0, II–IV no spines; Mt I –IV no spines. Prosoma pale yellow-brown with long scaly hairs. Opisthosoma and legs yellow-brown. Dorsal portion of opisthosoma pale JUH\ ZLWK FRORXU SDWWHUQ ()LJ. ƻ$), ÀDQNV DQG WHUPLQDO SRUWLRQ ZKLWLVK ZLWK RYHUODSSLQJ scale-like hairs accompanied by a few short and dark setae, more numerous over prosoma. Cheliceral furrow with 4.4 teeth on right chelicerae and 3.3 on left. Palp as in Figs 2G, 2H.</p> <p>Female.</p> <p>Total body length 6.57. Prosoma 3.40 long, 3.49 wide. Opisthosoma 3.53 long, 2.58 wide. Eye diameter and interdistances: AME 0.12, ALE 0.10, PME 0.10, PLE 0.20, AME – AME 0.16, AME – ALE 0.43, AME – PME 0.15, PME – PME 0.73, PME –PLE 0.38, PLE–PLE 1.48, ALE – ALE 1.32. Leg formula: 2?341. Leg measurements: I – Fe ³.oo, 3DW+7LE ³.8o, 0W l.8o, 7D o.9o, WRWDO 9.ƽo;,, ± PLVVLQJ,,,, ± ³.4o, ³.9o, ƻ.lo, o.9o, total 10.30, IV – 3.40, 3.80, 2.10, 0.90, total 10.20. Leg spination: Fe I pr1.0.0, d1.1.0, II missing, III–IV d1.1.0; Tib I v2.2.1 (Fig. 2D), II missing, III–IV v1.0.0; Mt I v2.2.0, II missing, III–IV no spines. Prosoma light reddish brown, legs and opisthosoma pale yellow-brown. Body covered with feathery and scale-like hairs with abundant short setae over prosoma and legs, less abundant over opisthosoma. Chelicera furrow with 4.4 teeth (Fig. 2C). Habitus (Fig. 2A), some somatic characters (Figs 2B–D), and epigyne and vulva as in Figs 2E, 2F.</p> <p>+RORW\SH: ƃ 0$'$*$6&amp;$5: Toamasina Prov.: Foulpointe, forêt sur argile, tamisage litiere, 7.xii.1993, A. Pauly (MRAC 200.451).</p> <p>3DUDW\SH: Ƃ VDPH GDWD DV KRORW\SH (05$&amp; ƻoo.ƻo³).</p> <p>Distribution: Known only from the type locality.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D387AC711A8746FDDBFA31FD54FA22	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Corronca, José Antonio;Rodríguez Artigas, Sandra M.	Corronca, José Antonio, Rodríguez Artigas, Sandra M. (2011): New species of the Madagascan genus Hovops Benoit, 1968 (Araneae: Selenopidae), with a description of the H. madagascariensis PDOH DQG DQ LGHQWL ¿ FDWLRQ NH \. African Invertebrates 52 (2): 295, DOI: 10.5733/afin.052.0206, URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.5733/afin.052.0206
03D387AC71188748FDEEFA38FBDFFAEF.text	03D387AC71188748FDEEFA38FBDFFAEF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hovops lidiae Corronca & Rodríguez Artigas 2011	<div><p>Hovops lidiae sp. n.</p> <p>Fig. 3</p> <p>Etymology: 7KH VSHFL¿F QDPH LV GHGLFDWHG WR /LGLD, WKH PRWKHU RI WKH VHFRQG DXWKRU.</p> <p>Diagnosis: Females of H. lidiae sp. n. can be confused with females of H. merina sp.n., EXW GLIIHU E\ WKH VKDSH RI WKH PLGGOH ¿HOG RI WKH HSLJ\QH ()LJ. ³)), ZKLFK LV VXE‒FLUFXODU in H. merina sp. n. (Fig. 5D). On the other hand, the shape of the copulatory ducts is PRUH RU OHVV VLPLODU LQ LWV WUDFNV, EXW WKHLU ¿UVW SRUWLRQ LV GLIIHUHQW ()LJ. ³*). 7KH FRSX‒ latory ducts turn over the head of the spermatheca, leaving one portion without cover (Fig. 3G), in contrast to what occurs in H. merina sp. n. (Fig. 5E).</p> <p>Description:</p> <p>Male (holotype).</p> <p>Total body length 7.53. Prosoma 3.82 long, 4.51 wide. Opisthosoma 3.71 long, 2.81 wide. Eye diameter and interdistances: AME 0.21, ALE 0.15, PME 0.16, PLE 0.26, AME – AME 0.32, AME – ALE 0.50, AME – PME 0.09, PME – PME 0.85, PME –PLE 0.45, PLE–PLE 2.06, ALE – ALE 1.72. Leg formula: 2413. Leg measurements: I – Fe 6.50, 3DW+7LE 8.Ϭo, 0W Ϭ.lo, 7D ƻ.³o, WRWDO ƻ³.ƽo,,, ± 7.8o, 9.ƽo, Ϭ.7o, ƻ.ƻo, WRWDO ƻϬ.ƻo;,,, ± 7.20, 8.40, 5.70, 2.10, 23.40 total, IV – 7.40, 8.20, 6.20, 2.10, total 23.90. Leg spination: Fe I d1.1.0, pr1.0.0, II d1.1.0, rt1.1.0, III–IV d1.1.0; Tib I v2.2.2.1.1, rt1.0.0, II v2.2.2.2 (Fig. 3E), rt1.0.0, III v2.2.0; Mt II –III v1.0.0; Tib IV and Mt I &amp; IV no spines. Prosoma pale red-brown with long, light, feathery hairs, and sparse small scale-like hairs. Legs pale yellow-brown. Opisthosoma yellow with light and undifferentiated grey pattern (Fig. 3A), with overlapping scale-like hairs accompanied by few and short setae. Chelicera furrow with 3.3 teeth on right chelicera, and 3.4 on the left. Some somatic characters and palp as in Figs 3B–E.</p> <p>Female (paratype).</p> <p>Total body length 9.09. Prosoma 4.20 long, 4.88 wide. Opisthosoma 4.89 long, 2.73 wide. Eye diameter and interdistances: AME 0.21, ALE 0.18, PME 0.17, PLE 0.22, AME – AME 0.29, AME – ALE 0.64, AME – PME 0.16, PME – PME 0.99, PME –PLE 0.65, PLE–PLE 2.43, ALE – ALE 2.02. Leg formula: 2431. Leg measurements: I – Fe 4.70, 3DW+7LE ƽ.8o, 0W ³.4o, 7D l.4o, WRWDO lƽ.³o,,, ± ƽ.ƻo, Ϭ.4o, ³.7o, l.ƽo, WRWDO lϬ.8o; III – 5.10, 5.80, 3.50, 1.50, 15.90 total, IV – 5.20, 5.80, 3.50, 1.60, total 16.10. Leg spination: Fe I vd1.1.0, pr1.1.0, II–IV d1.1.0; Tib I –II v2.2.1, III v1.1.0, IV no spines; Mt I –II v2.2.0, III v1.1.0 (prolateral row) v0.0.0 (retrolateral row), IV no spines. Colour and other somatic characters similar to those of male. Cheliceral furrow with 3.2 teeth. Habitus, epigyne and vulva as in Figs 3A, 3F, 3G.</p> <p>+RORW\SH:ƃ 0$'$*$6&amp;$5: Fianarantsoa Prov.: <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=47.426666&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-21.248333" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 47.426666/lat -21.248333)">Talatakely</a>, 21°14.9'S: 47°25.6'E, 19–30.iv.1998, N.Penny, C. Griswold, D. Kavanaugh, M. Raherilalao, J. Ranorianarisoa, J. Schweikert &amp; D. Ubick (CASC).</p> <p>3DUDW\SHV: ƻƃ lƂ ƻ LPPDWXUHV, VDPH GDWD DV KRORW\SH (&amp;$6&amp;).</p> <p>Other material examined: MADAGASCAR: Fianarantsoa Prov.: lƃ 5DQRPDIDQD 1.3., ƻl°lƻ‵6:47°ƻ7‵(, Y.l99ƻ, 9. &amp; %. 5RWK, 6..DULNR (&amp;$6&amp;); lƃ 7DODWDNHO\, ƻl°l4.9‵6:47°ƻƽ.Ϭ‵(, DW QLJKW, l9±³o.LY.l998, &amp;. Griswold et al. (CASC).</p> <p>Remark: The male holotype corresponds to the largest specimens of the type series.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D387AC71188748FDEEFA38FBDFFAEF	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Corronca, José Antonio;Rodríguez Artigas, Sandra M.	Corronca, José Antonio, Rodríguez Artigas, Sandra M. (2011): New species of the Madagascan genus Hovops Benoit, 1968 (Araneae: Selenopidae), with a description of the H. madagascariensis PDOH DQG DQ LGHQWL ¿ FDWLRQ NH \. African Invertebrates 52 (2): 295, DOI: 10.5733/afin.052.0206, URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.5733/afin.052.0206
03D387AC7116874AFE66FA40FD3CFAE3.text	03D387AC7116874AFE66FA40FD3CFAE3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hovops madagascariensis (Vinson 1863)	<div><p>Hovops madagascariensis (Vinson, 1863)</p> <p>Fig. 4 Selenops madagascariensis: 9LQVRQ l8Ϭ³: ³o³, SO. ³, ¿J. ³. (7\SH ORFDOLW\: 0DGDJDVFDU. 7\SH PDWHULDO GH‒</p> <p>posited in Museum of Lübeck, Germany, lost.) Hovops madagascariensis: Benoit 1968: 117. Diagnosis: Males of H. madagascariensis are distinguished from other species by the particular shape of the RTA (Fig. 4C), the short AM with wider base (Fig. 4D), and the end of the conductor very sclerotized, pointed and curved (Figs 4C, 4D). Females are characterized by the shape of the epigyne, with widely separated lateral lobes in the DQWHULRU SRUWLRQ ()LJ. 4(), DQG WKH PLGGOH ¿HOG RI WKH HSLJ\QH EHLQJ D VPRRWK FDYLW\; WKH anterior copulatory openings; and the complex and multilobulated spermathecae (Fig.4F). Description:</p> <p>Male (MRAC 208.445).</p> <p>Total body length 13.41. Prosoma 5.71 long, 6.26 wide. Opisthosoma 7.70 long, 4.73 wide. Eye diameter and interdistances: AME 0.25, ALE 0.21, PME 0.20, PLE 0.34, AME – AME 0.37, AME – ALE 0.79, AME – PME 0.19, PME – PME 1.21, PME –PLE 0.73, PLE–PLE 2.93, ALE – ALE 2.45. Leg formula: 2431. Leg measurements: I – Fe 6.90, 3DW+7LE 9.ƽo, 0W Ϭ.ƽo, 7D ƻ.4o, WRWDO ƻƽ.³o,,, ± 8.ƽo, lo.4o, 7.ƽo, ƻ.ƽo WRWDO ƻ8.9o; III – 8.20, 9.80, 6.70, 2.20, 26.90 total, IV – 8.20, 9.70, 7.30, 2.30, total 27.50. Leg spination: Fe I d1.1.0, pr1.0.0, rt1.1.1, II d1.1.1, pr1.1.1, rt1.1.1, III d1.1.1, pr1.1.0, rt1.1.1, IV d1.1.0, pr1.1.0, rt1.1.1; Tib I –II d0.1.0, v2.2.2, rt1.1.0, III pr1.1.0, v2.2.2, rt1.1.0, IV pr1.1.0, v2.2.0, rt1.1.0; Mt I d1.0.0, v2.2.0, rt1.0.0, II pr1.0.0, v2.2.0, rt1.0.0, III pr1.0.0, v2.2.0, rt1.0.0, IV v2.1.0, rt1.0.0. Prosoma reddish brown, legs brown, opisthosoma yellowish brown with a central colour pattern with dorsal grey lines on WKH ÀDQNV. &amp;KHOLFHUDO IXUURZ ZLWK ³.³ WHHWK. 3DOS DQG WLELD DQG PHWDWDUVDO VSLQDWLRQ DV in Figs 4C, 4D &amp; 4H.</p> <p>Female. Was described by Vinson (1863) as “a very common species found in Madagascar, especially in human dwellings in Tananarive”. Habitus, some somatic characters and the epigyne and vulva as in Figs 4A, 4B &amp; 4E–G.</p> <p>Variation: Some male specimens show a lighter colour pattern that is repeated in the sclerotization of the bulb and tibial apophysis.</p> <p>Material examined: MADAGASCAR: Antananarivo Prov.: lƃ 'XNH +RXVH‒0DQDNDPELKLQ\, l7.LLL.l99ƻ, %. 5RWK &amp; 6. -..DULNy (&amp;$6&amp;); ƻƃ ƻƂ 5pVHUYH 6SpFLDOH G¶$PERKLWDQWHO\,)RUpW G¶$PERKLWDQWHO\,l8°l³‵6: 47°17'E, 20.9 km 72° NE d’Ankazobe, 1410 m, 17–22.iv.2001, montane rainforest, J.J. Rafanomezantsoa et al. (&amp;$6&amp;‒--5lƽƻ); ƽƂ ³4 LPPDWXUHV, ³ NP 4l° 1($PERKLPDQJD, l8°44‵6:47°³4‵(, l4oo P, l.[L.l99³, -. &amp;RGGLQJWRQ, -. 6FKDUII, 6. /DUFKHU, &amp;. *ULVZROG, 5. $QGULDPDVLPDQDQD (&amp;$6&amp;); lƂ 0DQMDNDWRPSR, lƻ.LLL.l994, KLJK IRUHVW, $. 3DXO\ (05$&amp; ƻol.7ƻl); lƂ 0DQMDNDWRPSR, lƻ.LY.l99ƽ, 5. -RFTXp (05$&amp; ƻol.8l³); lƃ lƂ VXEDGXOW, $PEDWRODPS\, [.l998, 5. 9DQ (VEURHFN (05$&amp; ƻo8.44ƽ &amp; ƻo8.448). Fianarantsoa Prov.: 4ƃ ƻƂ ƻ LPPDWXUHV, 3DUF 1DWLRQDOH 5DQRPDIDQD,7DODWDNHO\,ƻl°l4‵6:47°ƻƽ‵(, l9±³o.LY.l998, N. Penny, C. Griswold, D. Kavanaugh, M. Raherilalao, J. Ranorianarisoa, J. Schweikert &amp; D. Ubick (CASC); lƃ 7DODWDNHO\, ƻl°l4‵6:47°ƻƽ‵(, LY.l99ƻ, 9. 5RWK (&amp;$6&amp;).</p> <p>Distribution: Antananarivo and Fianarantsoa provinces.</p> <p>Note: In the examined material, we found females that match the description and drawings proposed by Vinson (1863) for this species together with males that here are described as the male of H. madagascariensis.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D387AC7116874AFE66FA40FD3CFAE3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Corronca, José Antonio;Rodríguez Artigas, Sandra M.	Corronca, José Antonio, Rodríguez Artigas, Sandra M. (2011): New species of the Madagascan genus Hovops Benoit, 1968 (Araneae: Selenopidae), with a description of the H. madagascariensis PDOH DQG DQ LGHQWL ¿ FDWLRQ NH \. African Invertebrates 52 (2): 295, DOI: 10.5733/afin.052.0206, URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.5733/afin.052.0206
03D387AC7114874BFDD4FA78FD32FCAA.text	03D387AC7114874BFDD4FA78FD32FCAA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hovops merina Corronca & Rodríguez Artigas 2011	<div><p>Hovops merina sp. n.</p> <p>Fig. 5</p> <p>Etymology: The species name is dedicated to the Merina (“people of the highlands”) of Antananarivo.</p> <p>Diagnosis: Females of H. merina sp. n. differ from the other females of the genus by the SDUWLFXODU VKDSH RI WKH PLGGOH ¿HOG, WKH ODWHUDO OREHV, WKH VHFRQGDU\ HSLJ\QDO SRFNHWV (Fig. 5D), and the vulva (Fig. 5E).</p> <p>Description:</p> <p>Female.</p> <p>Total body length 13.24. Prosoma 5.34 long, 5.93 wide. Opisthosoma 7.90 long, 7.50 wide. Eye diameter and interdistances: AME 0.23, ALE 0.22, PME 0.18, PLE 0.31, AME – AME 0.34, AME – ALE 0.79, AME – PME 0.23, PME – PME 1.21, PME –PLE 0.80, PLE–PLE 2.98, ALE – ALE 2.46. Leg formula: 2431. Leg measurements: I – Fe ƽ.ƻo, 3DW+7LE Ϭ.8o, 0W ³.Ϭo, 7D l.³o, WRWDO lϬ.9o,,, ± Ϭ.oo, 7.4o, ³.8o, l.³o, WRWDO l8.ƽo, III – 5.30, 6.60, 3.80, 1.30, total 17.00, IV – 6.00, 6.60, 3.80, 1.40, total 17.80. Leg spination: Fe I d1.1.0, pr1.1.0, II–IV d1.1.0; Tib I v2.2.1, II v2.2.0, III v1.2.0, IV no spines; Mt I –II v2.2.0, III v2.0.0, IV no spines. Prosoma reddish brown with scale-like and feathery hairs, as on legs. Legs pale red-brown, opisthosoma yellow-brown with SRRUO\‒GH¿QHG FHQWUDO JUH\ SDWWHUQ ()LJ. ƽ$), DEXQGDQW RYHUODSSLQJ VFDOH‒OLNH KDLUV mixed with short and dark setae covering entire body (Fig. 5C). Cheliceral furrow with 3.2 teeth. Epigyne and vulva as in Figs 5D, 5E.</p> <p>Male. Unknown.</p> <p>+RORW\SH:Ƃ 0$'$*$6&amp;$5: Antananarivo Prov.: 3 km 41° NE <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=47.96&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-18.473333" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 47.96/lat -18.473333)">Andranomay</a>, 11.5 km 147° SSE Anjozorobe, 18°28'24"S: 47°57'36"E, 1300 m, montane rainforest, 5–13.xii.2000, C. Griswold et al. (CASC ENT 9004212).</p> <p>Distribution: Known only from the type locality.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D387AC7114874BFDD4FA78FD32FCAA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Corronca, José Antonio;Rodríguez Artigas, Sandra M.	Corronca, José Antonio, Rodríguez Artigas, Sandra M. (2011): New species of the Madagascan genus Hovops Benoit, 1968 (Araneae: Selenopidae), with a description of the H. madagascariensis PDOH DQG DQ LGHQWL ¿ FDWLRQ NH \. African Invertebrates 52 (2): 295, DOI: 10.5733/afin.052.0206, URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.5733/afin.052.0206
