taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03D0961AFFAB7013FCE8D429FBE9FF69.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15483534/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15483534	FIG. 1. Isotype of Neea contracta D.S.Costa & E.F.S.Rossetto (from M.R. Mesquita 14; RB [RB352746]). A. Flowering branch. B. Detail of pistillate inflorescence. C. Pistillate flower. D. Detail of pistillate flower. Image reproduced with permission from the RB Herbarium.	FIG. 1. Isotype of Neea contracta D.S.Costa & E.F.S.Rossetto (from M.R. Mesquita 14; RB [RB352746]). A. Flowering branch. B. Detail of pistillate inflorescence. C. Pistillate flower. D. Detail of pistillate flower. Image reproduced with permission from the RB Herbarium.	2025-01-06	Costa, Daniel da S.;Rossetto, Elson Felipe S.;Giacomin, Leandro L.		Zenodo	biologists	Costa, Daniel da S.;Rossetto, Elson Felipe S.;Giacomin, Leandro L.			
03D0961AFFAB7013FCE8D429FBE9FF69.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15483536/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15483536	FIG. 2. Known distribution of Neea contracta D.S.Costa & E.F.S.Rossetto and two morphologically similar species, N. parviflora and N. oppositifolia.	FIG. 2. Known distribution of Neea contracta D.S.Costa & E.F.S.Rossetto and two morphologically similar species, N. parviflora and N. oppositifolia.	2025-01-06	Costa, Daniel da S.;Rossetto, Elson Felipe S.;Giacomin, Leandro L.		Zenodo	biologists	Costa, Daniel da S.;Rossetto, Elson Felipe S.;Giacomin, Leandro L.			
03D0961AFFAB7013FCE8D429FBE9FF69.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15483538/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15483538	FIG. 3. A. The confusion matrix generated by a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier to classify species based on spectral variables. In the matrix layout, observed species’ names are positioned in rows, while predicted names are positioned in columns. Hence, entries along the diagonal indicate correct predictions, whereas those outside the diagonal signify prediction inaccuracies. B. Mean spectra for each species tested.	FIG. 3. A. The confusion matrix generated by a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier to classify species based on spectral variables. In the matrix layout, observed species’ names are positioned in rows, while predicted names are positioned in columns. Hence, entries along the diagonal indicate correct predictions, whereas those outside the diagonal signify prediction inaccuracies. B. Mean spectra for each species tested.	2025-01-06	Costa, Daniel da S.;Rossetto, Elson Felipe S.;Giacomin, Leandro L.		Zenodo	biologists	Costa, Daniel da S.;Rossetto, Elson Felipe S.;Giacomin, Leandro L.			
