identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03D1879E4838FFF8A396FC48FC48FEB1.text	03D1879E4838FFF8A396FC48FC48FEB1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Meligethinus Grouvelle 1906	<div><p>Meligethinus associations in southern Mozambique</p> <p>To complete the objectives of the Project of Italy-Mozambique scientific Cooperation, we recently performed research (2017–2019) on a number of palm (Arecaceae) areas in southern Mozambique to search for Meligethinae. Until now, only the widespread palm species Phoenix reclinata Jacq. has been demonstrated to host Meligethinae. The two new species co-occur syntopically on male flowers of the same Phoenix reclinata trees in Inhaca Island, also in company with M. suffusus (Sabatelli et al., unpublished data), and with three more Meligethinus species.</p> <p>Further research is planned to search for Meligethinae specimens on other widespread flowering palm species, such as Hyphaene petersiana Klotzsch ex Mart., 1845, on the potentially autochthonous (and widely cultivated elsewhere in central Africa) Elaeis guineensis Jacq. (see Jelínek 1992), and especially on the rare and threatened giant palm Raphia australis Oberm. &amp; Strey, which is endemic to this region (Maputo area in Mozambique and Kosi Bay area in northern KwaZulu-Natal). The giant inflorescences are produced once in its lifetime and are temporally unpredictable (Coates Palgrave 2002), but are most likely to occur during spring.</p> <p>The following is a list of Meligethinus species collected in southeastern Mozambique on male specimens of Phoenix reclinata. The collecting localities are listed in Table 1 (geographic details and data are in the examined material for the two new species described). Table 1 also reports the percentages of each Meligethinus species (with numbers of individuals) found in each locality: M. dolosus Grouvelle, 1919, M. hamerlae sp. nov., M. humeralis Grouvelle, 1906, M. mondlanei sp. nov., M. peringueyi (Grouvelle, 1919), and M. suffusus Kirejtshuk, 1980.</p> <p>Percentages of each species are similar in the two studied areas, with the only exception of M. hamerlae sp. nov., which is apparently absent outside Inhaca Island (where it is the rarest species). Meligethinus dolosus, M. peringueyi, and M. suffusus appear to be the dominant species, while the remaining taxa (M. mondlanei sp. nov. and M. humeralis) are more marginally represented in our collecting efforts.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D1879E4838FFF8A396FC48FC48FEB1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sabatelli, Simone;Liu, Meike;Cline, Andrew Richard;Lasoń, Andrzej;Macuvele, Suzana;Muambalo, Kisimenda;Chuquela, Lucilia;Audisio, Paolo	Sabatelli, Simone, Liu, Meike, Cline, Andrew Richard, Lasoń, Andrzej, Macuvele, Suzana, Muambalo, Kisimenda, Chuquela, Lucilia, Audisio, Paolo (2020): Palms and pollen beetles: two new anthophilous beetle species of Meligethinus from Mozambique (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae: Meligethinae). Zootaxa 4802 (1), DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4802.1.2
03D1879E483CFFFAA396FA45FAD9F85F.text	03D1879E483CFFFAA396FA45FAD9F85F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Meligethinus hamerlae Sabatelli & Liu & Cline & Lasoń & Macuvele & Muambalo & Chuquela & Audisio 2020	<div><p>Meligethinus hamerlae sp. nov.</p> <p>(Figs 1 e–f, i, p)</p> <p>Diagnosis. Narrowly elongate, moderately transversely convex, uniformly testaceous-orange. Similar in external shape and color to M. mondlanei sp. nov. described above and similar to the sympatric M. suffusus, but easily differentiated from the former by the markedly distinct shape of metatibiae in males, and the different shape of male and female genitalia, as well as the presence of a small dorsal, medial, pre-distal projection on the female pygidium. The new species is easily differentiated from the latter by the presence of the medial projection on the female pygidium, by the markedly distinct shape of male genitalia, and the usually paler body color. This new species is likely closely related to the central African M. muehlei Jelínek, 1992, which is on average larger and darker, characterized by completely different male metatibiae, a markedly larger and longer pygidial female projection, and distinctively shaped male and female genitalia.</p> <p>Description. (male holotype). Size: body length 2.4 mm, width 1.10 mm. Body narrowly elongate, scarcely transversely convex, uniformly testaceous-orange. Dorsal surface rather densely, finely and shallowly punctate (spaces between pronotal and elytral punctures ~1.5–2× diameter), with dull and shagreened interspaces; elytra without traces of transverse strigose sculpturing. Pronotum trapezoidal in shape, with widely arcuate lateral sides, maximum width near posterior five sixths. Pubescence on pronotum and elytra sparse, golden-whitish, moderately long and distinct, each seta markedly shorter than antennomere 6, slightly longer along posterior base. Body uniformly orange-yellowish, without pale areas, including peripheral margins (pronotal carina) of pronotum; legs and antennae uniformly yellowish-orange, testaceous, with antennal club distinctly darker, pale brown. Antennal club elongate, symmetrical, without differences between sexes. Proximal base of pygidium with normal, “V” shaped medial impression, directed posteriad. Prosternal process broadly rounded distad, maximum width near distal 2/5. Metaventrite almost flat, only slightly depressed in posterior half, with a scarcely distinct longitudinal impression. Last abdominal ventrite bearing two rather small proximal semicircular impressions, diameter nearly 1.2× the diameter of an eye.</p> <p>Legs: protibia (Fig. 1k) wide, triangular, as in M. suffusus Kirejtshuk, 1980, protarsus nearly as wide as length of antennomere 3 (ratio WFTA/LFTA ≈ 0.25). Mesotibia wide, trapezoid shaped. Metatibia (Fig. 1m) scarcely wide, along inner side almost simple and regular in posterior half, not denticulate, almost identical to that of M. suffusus Kirejtshuk, 1980, exhibiting no marked sexual dimorphism.</p> <p>Male genitalia: distinctively shaped, with elongate and subparallel-sided tegmen (Fig. 1e), aedeagal median lobe rather small, maximum width at proximal fifth, ratio LEAE/WIAE = 2.15–2.20 (Fig. 1f); aedeagal apex narrowly truncate with a distinct and narrowly chisel-shaped distal apex, ~1/5 as wide (0.20×) as maximum basal aedeagal width (Fig. 2f). Ratio DTIN/LETE ≈ 0.44–0.48, median excision of tegmen narrow along first four-fifths of its length; ratio LETE/WITE = 1.40–1.42.</p> <p>Female: Protibia rather wide, triangular, slightly narrower than males, protarsus slightly narrower than males (ratio WFTA/LFTA ≈ 0.22). Mesotibia wide, trapezoid as in males. Metatibia simple and uniformly slightly nar- rower than males, along inner side almost rectilinear and not denticulate. Pygidium with a small but distinct median obliquely positioned conical protuberance directed posteriad, similar to females of Meligethinus muehlei from Rwanda (Jelínek 1992; Fig. 1n), but smaller (Fig. 1p). Ovipositor rather small and moderately sclerotized, not darkened toward the moderately blunt distal apex, exhibiting short styli, similar to that exhibited by M. suffusus (Kirejtshuk 1980; Fig. 1h), although exhibiting a slightly narrower distal gonocoxal apex (Fig. 1i). Ratio STLE/DSIA ≈ 0.40; ratio STLE/CGOW ≈ 0.17; ratio GONL/CGOW ≈ 3. Ratio OVPL/GONL ≈ 2.15.</p> <p>Variation: Overall body sizes range from 1.9–2.6 mm (length) and 0.90–1.20 mm (width).</p> <p>Examined material. Holotype, male: Mozambique: Maputo Province, Inhaca Island, Farol, 10–15 m a.s.l., 25°58’22”S, 32°59’08”E, 21.ix.2018, P. Audisio &amp; S. Sabatelli lgt, sparsely forested and bushy area, beating male inflorescences of Phoenix reclinata Jacq. (Arecaceae) (MHNMM). Paratypes: 10 males, 13 females; same data as holotype, 2 males, 2 females (MHNMM, CAR-MZUR); same locality, 27.ix.2019, S. Sabatelli lgt, open and sparsely bushy area, beating male inflorescences of Phoenix reclinata Jacq. (Arecaceae), 6 males, 8 females (MHNMM, CAR-MZUR, CAS, CLA, ACC, NMPC); same locality, road between Farol and the Marine Biological Station, 10–15 m a.s.l., 26°00ʹ26ʹʹS, 32°56ʹ37ʹʹE, 27.ix.2019, S. Sabatelli lgt, open and sparsely bushy area, beating male inflorescences of Phoenix reclinata Jacq. (Arecaceae), 2 males, 3 females (NMMU, CAR-MZUR).</p> <p>Distribution. This species is known from Inhaca Island in southern Mozambique (Fig. 3). The host-plant Phoenix reclinata is widespread in Eastern Africa (see above information on M. mondlanei sp. nov.; Coates Palgrave 2002; see also pza.sanbi.org/phoenix-reclinata). The geographic range could be wider, potentially including at least part of these areas. However, several attempts (2018–2019) aimed to collect M. hamerlae sp. nov. in nearby localities of continental southeastern Mozambique near Maputo failed in producing any additional specimens. The apparently exclusive presence of this new species at Inhaca is odd, considering this small island is separated from coastal areas of southeastern Mozambique by a shallow sea that did not create a barrier with the mainland during the most recent Würm Glaciation.</p> <p>Host-plants. This species appears to be strictly associated with male inflorescences of Phoenix reclinata Jacq. (Arecaceae). All specimens of the type series were collected by sweeping flowering males in conjunction with the more abundant Meligethinus dolosus, M. peringueyi, and M. suffusus, as well as a few specimens of the locally less abundant M. mondlanei sp. nov., and M. humeralis.</p> <p>Habitat. Locality data indicate this species prefers edges of sparsely forested and bushy areas, in sandy habitats close to the sea at very low altitudes.</p> <p>Phenology. The few available specimens were collected in middle and late September, which likely indicates adult activity from late August to early October.</p> <p>Etymology. The specific epithet honors Maria Grazia Hamerl, mother of the senior author S. Sabatelli.</p> <p>Taxonomic remarks. As reported above, this new species is similar in external shape to the sympatric M. mondlanei sp. nov. and especially to the sister species M. suffusus (see below), being otherwise unmistakable due to the peculiar shape of the female pygidium (Fig. 1p), and the distinctly different shape of the male genitalia (Figs 1 e–f), in particular the distinctly more narrowly chisel-shaped distal apex of the aedeagus (distinctly wider in M. suffusus: Figs 1 c–d). The shared presence of a pre-distal conical protuberance on the female pygidium also suggests a close taxonomic relationship of the new species to the larger Meligethinus muehlei from Rwanda (Jelínek 1992), which is easily differentiated from the new species by the different male and female genitalia, a much larger size of the pygidial conical protuberance in females (Fig. 1n), darker body color with large, dark brown elytral spots, and longer golden hairs on legs in males (Jelínek 1992). Preliminary molecular analyses of the genus Meligethinus (Sabatelli et al., unpublished data) demonstrates that the sympatric and syntopic M. hamerlae sp. nov. and M. suffusus are sister species, amply separated by an average genetic p -distance (COI gene) of ≈ 0.6, indicating a well-estab- lished specific differentiation, combined with a clear common origin from a shared most recent ancestor.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D1879E483CFFFAA396FA45FAD9F85F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sabatelli, Simone;Liu, Meike;Cline, Andrew Richard;Lasoń, Andrzej;Macuvele, Suzana;Muambalo, Kisimenda;Chuquela, Lucilia;Audisio, Paolo	Sabatelli, Simone, Liu, Meike, Cline, Andrew Richard, Lasoń, Andrzej, Macuvele, Suzana, Muambalo, Kisimenda, Chuquela, Lucilia, Audisio, Paolo (2020): Palms and pollen beetles: two new anthophilous beetle species of Meligethinus from Mozambique (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae: Meligethinae). Zootaxa 4802 (1), DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4802.1.2
03D1879E483FFFFDA396FD34FC6BFAF9.text	03D1879E483FFFFDA396FD34FC6BFAF9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Meligethinus mondlanei Sabatelli & Liu & Cline & Lasoń & Macuvele & Muambalo & Chuquela & Audisio 2020	<div><p>Meligethinus mondlanei sp. nov.</p> <p>(Figs 1 a–b, g, j, l, Fig. 2)</p> <p>Diagnosis. Narrowly elongate, scarcely transversely convex, uniformly testaceous-orange; similar in habitus shape to the Oriental Meligethinus plagiatus (Grouvelle, 1894) (from NE India to N Vietnam and S China, including Taiwan), as well as to the sympatric M. hamerlae sp. nov. and M. suffusus Kirejtshuk, 1980. This species is easily differentiated by the peculiarly shaped metatibiae in males, and the different shape of male and female genitalia.</p> <p>Description (male holotype). Size: body length 2.2 mm, width 1.08 mm. Body narrowly elongate, scarcely transversely convex, uniformly testaceous-orange (Fig. 2). Dorsal surface rather densely, finely and shallowly punctate (spaces between pronotal and elytral punctures ~1.5–2× diameter of puncture), with dull and shagreened interspaces; elytra without traces of transverse strigose sculpturing. Pronotum trapezoidal with widely arcuate lateral sides, maximum width near posterior five-sixths (Fig. 2). Pubescence on pronotum and elytra sparse, golden-whitish, moderately long and distinct, each seta markedly shorter than antennomere 6, slightly longer along posterior base. Body uniformly orange-yellowish, without pale or dark areas, including peripheral margins (pronotal carina) of pronotum; legs and antennae uniformly yellowish-orange testaceous, with antennal club distinctly darker and pale brown. Antennal club elongate, symmetrical (Fig. 2). Proximal base of pygidium with normal, “V” shaped impression along midline, directed posteriad. Median flat portion of prosternal process broadly rounded distad, nearly parallel-sided, maximum width near distal 2/5. Metaventrite with a moderately deep, nearly pentagonal impression, occupying posterior two-thirds of the metaventrite, impression deeper longitudinally along middle. Last abdominal ventrite bearing two moderately large proximal semicircular impressions, diameter nearly 1× the maximum diameter of an eye.</p> <p>Legs: Protibia (Fig. 1j) wide, triangular, protarsi nearly as wide as length of antennomere 3; ratio WFTA/LFTA ≈ 0.25. Mesotibia (Fig. 2) wide, trapezoid-like. Metatibia (Fig. 1-l) moderately wide, peculiarly shaped, their inner side strongly modified and narrowed at posterior half, markedly denticulate, distinct from any other known member of the genus.</p> <p>Male genitalia: distinctly shaped, rather small, with elongate and subparallel-sided tegmen, slightly convergent distad (Fig. 1a), parameres with roundly pointed apex; ratio DTIN/LETE ≈ 0.60–0.65, excised inner margins without projections; ratio LETE/WITE = 1.45–1.50. Aedeagal median lobe peculiarly shaped, markedly narrowed in distal third, maximum width near distal third; distinctly truncate and chisel-shaped distad (Fig. 1b); ratio LEAE/ WIAE = 1.80–1.90. Main sclerites of internal sac (endophallus) small and rod-shaped in dorsal and lateral view.</p> <p>Female: Antennae similar in both sexes. Protibia rather wide, triangular, slightly narrower than males, protarsus slightly narrower than males (ratio WFTA/LFTA ≈ 0.20). Mesotibia wide, trapezium-like as in males. Metati- bia almost simple and uniformly narrower than in males, not denticulate, or arcuately incised along inner side. Metaventrite in females almost flat, without distinct impression, medially with a scarcely impressed longitudinal line. Ovipositor rather small and lightly sclerotized, not darkened towards moderately blunt distal apex, styli long, inserted close to apex (Fig. 1g). Ratio STLE/DSIA ≈ 0.50; ratio STLE/CGOW ≈ 0.25; ratio GONL/CGOW ≈ 3.1. Ratio OVPL/GONL ≈ 1.80.</p> <p>Variation: The overall body size 2.0– 2.7 mm (length) and 1.05–1.25 mm (width) can be variable between individuals.</p> <p>Examined material. Holotype, male: Mozambique: Maputo Province, Inhaca Island, Farol, 10–15 m a.s.l., 25°58’22”S, 32°59’08”E, 21.ix.2018, P. Audisio &amp; S. Sabatelli lgt, sparsely forested and bushy area, beating male inflorescences of Phoenix reclinata Jacq. (Arecaceae) (MHNMM). Paratypes: 35 males, 32 females; same locality, 27.ix.2019, S. Sabatelli lgt, 10 males, 9 females (MHNMM, CAR-MZUR, CAS, CLA, ACC, NMPC); same locality, road between Farol and the Marine Biological Station, 10–15 m a.s.l., 26°00ʹ26ʹʹS, 32°56ʹ37ʹʹE, 27.ix.2019, S. Sabatelli lgt, open and sparsely bushy area, beating male inflorescences of Phoenix reclinata Jacq. (Arecaceae), 5 males, 6 females (MHNMM, CAR-MZUR); Maputo Province, Maputo Special Reserve, Chingute Lake, 10–15 m a.s.l., 26°30’28”S, 32°48’45”E, 8.x.2018, S. Sabatelli lgt, open and sparsely bushy area, beating male inflorescences of Phoenix reclinata Jacq. (Arecaceae), 2 males, 2 females (MHNMM, CAR-MZUR); Maputo Province, Zitundo, 26°40’44”S, 32°47’55”E, 14.ix.2019, S. Sabatelli lgt, open and sparsely bushy area, beating male inflorescences of Phoenix reclinata Jacq. (Arecaceae), 18 males, 15 females (MHNMM, CAR-MZUR).</p> <p>Distribution. This species is known only from southern Mozambique (Fig. 3). The host plant Phoenix reclinata is widespread in eastern portions of central and southern Africa, northwards to southern Egypt and southwards to the Eastern Cape Province in South Africa (Coates Palgrave 2002; see also pza.sanbi.org/phoenix-reclinata). The geographic range could potentially be wider, including at least parts of these areas.</p> <p>Host plants. In Mozambique, this species appears to be strictly associated with male inflorescences of Phoenix reclinata Jacq. (Arecaceae).</p> <p>Habitat. Locality data indicate this species prefers the edges of sparsely forested and bushy areas, in sandy habitats close to the sea, at low altitudes. All specimens of the type series were collected by sweeping flowering males of Phoenix reclinata in conjunction with the more abundant Meligethinus dolosus and M. peringueyi, as well as a few specimens of the locally less abundant M. hamerlae sp. nov., M. suffusus, and M. humeralis.</p> <p>Phenology. Specimens were collected in middle and late September, which likely indicates adult activity from late August to early October.</p> <p>Etymology. The specific epithet is derived from the current name of the University of Maputo, the former “University of Lourenço Marques”, which, after Mozambique became independent in 1975, was renamed in honor of Frelimo leader Eduardo Mondlane in 1976. We are honored to name this remarkable new species from the name of this University, in consideration of the collaborative activities of international cooperation with the Rome Sapienza University.</p> <p>Taxonomic remarks. This new species is vaguely similar in external shape to the Oriental M. plagiatus from northeastern India, northern Vietnam and southern China and to the African and sympatric M. suffusus and M. hamerlae sp. nov. (see below). However, the new species is distinguished by the peculiar shape of the male metatibiae and male genitalia, as well as the distinctly shaped female ovipositor.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D1879E483FFFFDA396FD34FC6BFAF9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sabatelli, Simone;Liu, Meike;Cline, Andrew Richard;Lasoń, Andrzej;Macuvele, Suzana;Muambalo, Kisimenda;Chuquela, Lucilia;Audisio, Paolo	Sabatelli, Simone, Liu, Meike, Cline, Andrew Richard, Lasoń, Andrzej, Macuvele, Suzana, Muambalo, Kisimenda, Chuquela, Lucilia, Audisio, Paolo (2020): Palms and pollen beetles: two new anthophilous beetle species of Meligethinus from Mozambique (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae: Meligethinae). Zootaxa 4802 (1), DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4802.1.2
