taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03D11A22FFC4F75CFDBE6D882715A988.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635008/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635008	Fig. 7. Trichobothrial areas, SEM photographs. A. Open trichobothrial areas of the pronotum of Sceletolepisma guadianicum (Mendes, 1992); the anterior area is visible in the upper part of the photo, and the posterior area is placed in the lower part. B. Closed trichobothrial area of Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov. (formerly Acrotelsella impudica). Scale bars: A = 0.2 mm; B = 50 μm.	Fig. 7. Trichobothrial areas, SEM photographs. A. Open trichobothrial areas of the pronotum of Sceletolepisma guadianicum (Mendes, 1992); the anterior area is visible in the upper part of the photo, and the posterior area is placed in the lower part. B. Closed trichobothrial area of Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov. (formerly Acrotelsella impudica). Scale bars: A = 0.2 mm; B = 50 μm.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFC4F75CFDBE6D882715A988.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635012/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635012	Fig. 9. Chaetotaxy of coxae in Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802, micrographs of the external margin of the coxa. A. Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov., showing discrete combs of few macrochaetae. B. Neoasterolepisma curtiseta Mendes, 1988, showing isolated macrochaetae inside a row of setulae. C. Ctenolepisma nicoletii (Lucas, 1846), with an irregular row of macrochaetae not clearly arranged in combs. Scale bars: A, C = 0.1 mm; B = 50 μm.	Fig. 9. Chaetotaxy of coxae in Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802, micrographs of the external margin of the coxa. A. Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov., showing discrete combs of few macrochaetae. B. Neoasterolepisma curtiseta Mendes, 1988, showing isolated macrochaetae inside a row of setulae. C. Ctenolepisma nicoletii (Lucas, 1846), with an irregular row of macrochaetae not clearly arranged in combs. Scale bars: A, C = 0.1 mm; B = 50 μm.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFC4F75CFDBE6D882715A988.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635014/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635014	Fig. 10. Praetarsal claws in Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802, SEM photographs. A. Praetarsus of Ctenolepisma nicoletii (Lucas, 1846), showing lateral claws with smooth base and finely striated tegument. B. Pretarsal claw of Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov., with microtrichia, and the empodium with striated tegument. Scale bars: A = 100 μm; B = 50 μm.	Fig. 10. Praetarsal claws in Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802, SEM photographs. A. Praetarsus of Ctenolepisma nicoletii (Lucas, 1846), showing lateral claws with smooth base and finely striated tegument. B. Pretarsal claw of Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov., with microtrichia, and the empodium with striated tegument. Scale bars: A = 100 μm; B = 50 μm.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFC4F75CFDBE6D882715A988.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635020/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635020	Fig. 13. Ovipositor types in Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802. A. Primary ovipositor of Ctenolepisma rothschildi Silvestri, 1907, SEM photograph. B–C. Secondary ovipositor of Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov., SEM photograph (B) and micrograph (C). Scale bars: A = 10 μm; B = 90 μm; C = 0.1 mm.	Fig. 13. Ovipositor types in Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802. A. Primary ovipositor of Ctenolepisma rothschildi Silvestri, 1907, SEM photograph. B–C. Secondary ovipositor of Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov., SEM photograph (B) and micrograph (C). Scale bars: A = 10 μm; B = 90 μm; C = 0.1 mm.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFC4F75CFDBE6D882715A988.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635030/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635030	Fig. 18. Caribesella gen. nov., diagnostic characters of the head not previously illustrated. Micrograph showing part of the head chaetotaxy: the clypeal tuft of one side (white arrow) and the labrum with no tufts (blue arrow); the frontal tuft of the same side is visible (yellow arrow). Scale bar = 0.1 mm.	Fig. 18. Caribesella gen. nov., diagnostic characters of the head not previously illustrated. Micrograph showing part of the head chaetotaxy: the clypeal tuft of one side (white arrow) and the labrum with no tufts (blue arrow); the frontal tuft of the same side is visible (yellow arrow). Scale bar = 0.1 mm.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFC4F75CFDBE6D882715A988.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635032/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635032	Fig. 19. Caribesella gen. nov., diagnostic characters not previously illustrated, SEM photographs. A. Orbicular scales of dorsal side of the abdomen. B. An indented scale of the dorsal side of the thorax. C. Coxal scales. D. Scales on the apex of the femur. E. Scales and setae on the basal part of the tibia. F. Scales on stylus IX. G. Open anterior trichobothrial area of the pronotum. Scale bars: A = 70 μm; B, G = 50 μm; C = 60 μm; D–E = 90 μm; F = 80 μm.	Fig. 19. Caribesella gen. nov., diagnostic characters not previously illustrated, SEM photographs. A. Orbicular scales of dorsal side of the abdomen. B. An indented scale of the dorsal side of the thorax. C. Coxal scales. D. Scales on the apex of the femur. E. Scales and setae on the basal part of the tibia. F. Scales on stylus IX. G. Open anterior trichobothrial area of the pronotum. Scale bars: A = 70 μm; B, G = 50 μm; C = 60 μm; D–E = 90 μm; F = 80 μm.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFC7F75BFE246BD82145AFB6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635008/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635008	Fig. 7. Trichobothrial areas, SEM photographs. A. Open trichobothrial areas of the pronotum of Sceletolepisma guadianicum (Mendes, 1992); the anterior area is visible in the upper part of the photo, and the posterior area is placed in the lower part. B. Closed trichobothrial area of Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov. (formerly Acrotelsella impudica). Scale bars: A = 0.2 mm; B = 50 μm.	Fig. 7. Trichobothrial areas, SEM photographs. A. Open trichobothrial areas of the pronotum of Sceletolepisma guadianicum (Mendes, 1992); the anterior area is visible in the upper part of the photo, and the posterior area is placed in the lower part. B. Closed trichobothrial area of Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov. (formerly Acrotelsella impudica). Scale bars: A = 0.2 mm; B = 50 μm.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFC7F75BFE246BD82145AFB6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635012/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635012	Fig. 9. Chaetotaxy of coxae in Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802, micrographs of the external margin of the coxa. A. Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov., showing discrete combs of few macrochaetae. B. Neoasterolepisma curtiseta Mendes, 1988, showing isolated macrochaetae inside a row of setulae. C. Ctenolepisma nicoletii (Lucas, 1846), with an irregular row of macrochaetae not clearly arranged in combs. Scale bars: A, C = 0.1 mm; B = 50 μm.	Fig. 9. Chaetotaxy of coxae in Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802, micrographs of the external margin of the coxa. A. Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov., showing discrete combs of few macrochaetae. B. Neoasterolepisma curtiseta Mendes, 1988, showing isolated macrochaetae inside a row of setulae. C. Ctenolepisma nicoletii (Lucas, 1846), with an irregular row of macrochaetae not clearly arranged in combs. Scale bars: A, C = 0.1 mm; B = 50 μm.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFC7F75BFE246BD82145AFB6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635014/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635014	Fig. 10. Praetarsal claws in Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802, SEM photographs. A. Praetarsus of Ctenolepisma nicoletii (Lucas, 1846), showing lateral claws with smooth base and finely striated tegument. B. Pretarsal claw of Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov., with microtrichia, and the empodium with striated tegument. Scale bars: A = 100 μm; B = 50 μm.	Fig. 10. Praetarsal claws in Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802, SEM photographs. A. Praetarsus of Ctenolepisma nicoletii (Lucas, 1846), showing lateral claws with smooth base and finely striated tegument. B. Pretarsal claw of Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov., with microtrichia, and the empodium with striated tegument. Scale bars: A = 100 μm; B = 50 μm.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFC7F75BFE246BD82145AFB6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635016/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635016	Fig. 11. Shape and chaetotaxy of the urotergite X (last abdominal tergite) of Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802, variability. A. Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov., adapted from Wygodzinsky (1959a). B. Qantelsella louisae Smith, 2015, from Smith (2015). C. Stylifera gigantea (Escherich, 1905), from Irish (1988c). D. Acrotelsella parlevar Smith 2016, from Smith (2016b). E. Hemitelsella clarksonorum Smith, 2016, from Smith (2016b). F. Hemitelsella hortorum Smith & Mitchell, 2021, from Smith & Mitchell (2021). G. Thermobia vallaris Irish, 1988, from Irish (1988b). H. Thermobia domestica (Packard, 1873), from Irish (1988b). I. Sceletolepisma sagartianum (Molero, Kahrarian & Gaju, 2016), from Kahrarian et al. (2016). J. Hyperlepisma patrizii Silvestri, 1932, from Silvestri (1932). K. Nebkhalepisma australe (Wygodzinsky, 1959), from Wygodzinsky (1959b). L. Hyperlepisma arabiense Irish, 1991, from Irish (1991). M. Ornatilepisma horni Irish, 1988, from Irish (1988a). N. Swalepisma mirabile Irish, 1988, from Irish & Mendes (1988). O. Sceletolepisma occidentale (Irish, 1987), from Irish (1987).	Fig. 11. Shape and chaetotaxy of the urotergite X (last abdominal tergite) of Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802, variability. A. Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov., adapted from Wygodzinsky (1959a). B. Qantelsella louisae Smith, 2015, from Smith (2015). C. Stylifera gigantea (Escherich, 1905), from Irish (1988c). D. Acrotelsella parlevar Smith 2016, from Smith (2016b). E. Hemitelsella clarksonorum Smith, 2016, from Smith (2016b). F. Hemitelsella hortorum Smith & Mitchell, 2021, from Smith & Mitchell (2021). G. Thermobia vallaris Irish, 1988, from Irish (1988b). H. Thermobia domestica (Packard, 1873), from Irish (1988b). I. Sceletolepisma sagartianum (Molero, Kahrarian & Gaju, 2016), from Kahrarian et al. (2016). J. Hyperlepisma patrizii Silvestri, 1932, from Silvestri (1932). K. Nebkhalepisma australe (Wygodzinsky, 1959), from Wygodzinsky (1959b). L. Hyperlepisma arabiense Irish, 1991, from Irish (1991). M. Ornatilepisma horni Irish, 1988, from Irish (1988a). N. Swalepisma mirabile Irish, 1988, from Irish & Mendes (1988). O. Sceletolepisma occidentale (Irish, 1987), from Irish (1987).	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFC7F75BFE246BD82145AFB6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635020/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635020	Fig. 13. Ovipositor types in Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802. A. Primary ovipositor of Ctenolepisma rothschildi Silvestri, 1907, SEM photograph. B–C. Secondary ovipositor of Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov., SEM photograph (B) and micrograph (C). Scale bars: A = 10 μm; B = 90 μm; C = 0.1 mm.	Fig. 13. Ovipositor types in Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802. A. Primary ovipositor of Ctenolepisma rothschildi Silvestri, 1907, SEM photograph. B–C. Secondary ovipositor of Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov., SEM photograph (B) and micrograph (C). Scale bars: A = 10 μm; B = 90 μm; C = 0.1 mm.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFC7F75BFE246BD82145AFB6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635032/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635032	Fig. 19. Caribesella gen. nov., diagnostic characters not previously illustrated, SEM photographs. A. Orbicular scales of dorsal side of the abdomen. B. An indented scale of the dorsal side of the thorax. C. Coxal scales. D. Scales on the apex of the femur. E. Scales and setae on the basal part of the tibia. F. Scales on stylus IX. G. Open anterior trichobothrial area of the pronotum. Scale bars: A = 70 μm; B, G = 50 μm; C = 60 μm; D–E = 90 μm; F = 80 μm.	Fig. 19. Caribesella gen. nov., diagnostic characters not previously illustrated, SEM photographs. A. Orbicular scales of dorsal side of the abdomen. B. An indented scale of the dorsal side of the thorax. C. Coxal scales. D. Scales on the apex of the femur. E. Scales and setae on the basal part of the tibia. F. Scales on stylus IX. G. Open anterior trichobothrial area of the pronotum. Scale bars: A = 70 μm; B, G = 50 μm; C = 60 μm; D–E = 90 μm; F = 80 μm.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFC3F762FF706FE721EDA8FD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635010/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635010	Fig. 8. Thoracic sternites in Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802. A. Mesosternal plate of Anisolepisma sp., adapted from Smith (2016a). B–D. Thoracic sternites (prosternum, mesosternum and metasternum, respectively) of a species of Ctenolepismatinae Mendes, 1991, Sceletolepisma rodriguezi (Mendes, Molero-Baltanás, Bach de Roca & Gaju-Ricart, 1993) that cover the base of coxae. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.	Fig. 8. Thoracic sternites in Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802. A. Mesosternal plate of Anisolepisma sp., adapted from Smith (2016a). B–D. Thoracic sternites (prosternum, mesosternum and metasternum, respectively) of a species of Ctenolepismatinae Mendes, 1991, Sceletolepisma rodriguezi (Mendes, Molero-Baltanás, Bach de Roca & Gaju-Ricart, 1993) that cover the base of coxae. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFC3F762FF706FE721EDA8FD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635018/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635018	Fig. 12. Paramera of Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802. A. Tubuliform paramere of Acrotelsa collaris (Fabricius, 1793). B. Big swollen paramere of Lepisma saccharinum Linnaeus, 1758, larger than the inner process of coxite IX and with glandular area. C. Medium-sized to small paramere of Neoasterolepisma hespericum Molero-Baltanás, Bach de Roca & Gaju-Ricart, 1997, with a small glandular area. D. Pseudoarticulated paramere with glandular area of Allacrotelsa kraepelini (Escherich, 1905). E. Pseudoarticulated paramere of Visma brigalowsum Smith, Mitchell & Molero-Baltanás 2021. F. A detail of a similar pseudoarticulated paramere, of Visma bingaraSmith, Mitchell & Molero-Baltanás 2021. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.	Fig. 12. Paramera of Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802. A. Tubuliform paramere of Acrotelsa collaris (Fabricius, 1793). B. Big swollen paramere of Lepisma saccharinum Linnaeus, 1758, larger than the inner process of coxite IX and with glandular area. C. Medium-sized to small paramere of Neoasterolepisma hespericum Molero-Baltanás, Bach de Roca & Gaju-Ricart, 1997, with a small glandular area. D. Pseudoarticulated paramere with glandular area of Allacrotelsa kraepelini (Escherich, 1905). E. Pseudoarticulated paramere of Visma brigalowsum Smith, Mitchell & Molero-Baltanás 2021. F. A detail of a similar pseudoarticulated paramere, of Visma bingaraSmith, Mitchell & Molero-Baltanás 2021. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFC3F762FF706FE721EDA8FD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12634993/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12634993	Fig. 2. Specialized sensilla of theantennae of Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802, adapted from Mendes (1986a). A. Silvestri’s sensillum (basiconic type F following Adel’s terminology). B. Bidigitate. C. Asteriform. D. Asteriform with annulated tegument. E. Poculiform. F. SEM photograph of a poculiform sensillum in Acrotelsella transpectinata Smith, 2016. Scale bars: A–E = 5 μm; F = 0.2 mm.	Fig. 2. Specialized sensilla of theantennae of Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802, adapted from Mendes (1986a). A. Silvestri’s sensillum (basiconic type F following Adel’s terminology). B. Bidigitate. C. Asteriform. D. Asteriform with annulated tegument. E. Poculiform. F. SEM photograph of a poculiform sensillum in Acrotelsella transpectinata Smith, 2016. Scale bars: A–E = 5 μm; F = 0.2 mm.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFC3F762FF706FE721EDA8FD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635028/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635028	Fig. 17. Some examples of variability in the body shape and scale pattern of Lepismatidae. A. Sceletolepisma guadianicum (Mendes, 1992), with body shape subcylindrical and greyish-brown uniform dorsal scales. B. Ctenolepisma nicoletii (Lucas, 1846), with the thorax slightly wider than the abdomen and dorsal scales forming longitudinal stripes. C. Neoasterolepisma curtiseta Mendes, 1988, with a wide thorax, detaching from abdomen base, and yellowish scales. D. Lepismina sp., with short body, wide thorax but not markedly detaching from abdomen base, and hypognathous head, not visible dorsally. Scale bars = 2 mm.	Fig. 17. Some examples of variability in the body shape and scale pattern of Lepismatidae. A. Sceletolepisma guadianicum (Mendes, 1992), with body shape subcylindrical and greyish-brown uniform dorsal scales. B. Ctenolepisma nicoletii (Lucas, 1846), with the thorax slightly wider than the abdomen and dorsal scales forming longitudinal stripes. C. Neoasterolepisma curtiseta Mendes, 1988, with a wide thorax, detaching from abdomen base, and yellowish scales. D. Lepismina sp., with short body, wide thorax but not markedly detaching from abdomen base, and hypognathous head, not visible dorsally. Scale bars = 2 mm.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFC3F762FF706FE721EDA8FD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635016/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635016	Fig. 11. Shape and chaetotaxy of the urotergite X (last abdominal tergite) of Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802, variability. A. Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov., adapted from Wygodzinsky (1959a). B. Qantelsella louisae Smith, 2015, from Smith (2015). C. Stylifera gigantea (Escherich, 1905), from Irish (1988c). D. Acrotelsella parlevar Smith 2016, from Smith (2016b). E. Hemitelsella clarksonorum Smith, 2016, from Smith (2016b). F. Hemitelsella hortorum Smith & Mitchell, 2021, from Smith & Mitchell (2021). G. Thermobia vallaris Irish, 1988, from Irish (1988b). H. Thermobia domestica (Packard, 1873), from Irish (1988b). I. Sceletolepisma sagartianum (Molero, Kahrarian & Gaju, 2016), from Kahrarian et al. (2016). J. Hyperlepisma patrizii Silvestri, 1932, from Silvestri (1932). K. Nebkhalepisma australe (Wygodzinsky, 1959), from Wygodzinsky (1959b). L. Hyperlepisma arabiense Irish, 1991, from Irish (1991). M. Ornatilepisma horni Irish, 1988, from Irish (1988a). N. Swalepisma mirabile Irish, 1988, from Irish & Mendes (1988). O. Sceletolepisma occidentale (Irish, 1987), from Irish (1987).	Fig. 11. Shape and chaetotaxy of the urotergite X (last abdominal tergite) of Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802, variability. A. Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov., adapted from Wygodzinsky (1959a). B. Qantelsella louisae Smith, 2015, from Smith (2015). C. Stylifera gigantea (Escherich, 1905), from Irish (1988c). D. Acrotelsella parlevar Smith 2016, from Smith (2016b). E. Hemitelsella clarksonorum Smith, 2016, from Smith (2016b). F. Hemitelsella hortorum Smith & Mitchell, 2021, from Smith & Mitchell (2021). G. Thermobia vallaris Irish, 1988, from Irish (1988b). H. Thermobia domestica (Packard, 1873), from Irish (1988b). I. Sceletolepisma sagartianum (Molero, Kahrarian & Gaju, 2016), from Kahrarian et al. (2016). J. Hyperlepisma patrizii Silvestri, 1932, from Silvestri (1932). K. Nebkhalepisma australe (Wygodzinsky, 1959), from Wygodzinsky (1959b). L. Hyperlepisma arabiense Irish, 1991, from Irish (1991). M. Ornatilepisma horni Irish, 1988, from Irish (1988a). N. Swalepisma mirabile Irish, 1988, from Irish & Mendes (1988). O. Sceletolepisma occidentale (Irish, 1987), from Irish (1987).	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFC3F762FF706FE721EDA8FD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635012/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635012	Fig. 9. Chaetotaxy of coxae in Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802, micrographs of the external margin of the coxa. A. Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov., showing discrete combs of few macrochaetae. B. Neoasterolepisma curtiseta Mendes, 1988, showing isolated macrochaetae inside a row of setulae. C. Ctenolepisma nicoletii (Lucas, 1846), with an irregular row of macrochaetae not clearly arranged in combs. Scale bars: A, C = 0.1 mm; B = 50 μm.	Fig. 9. Chaetotaxy of coxae in Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802, micrographs of the external margin of the coxa. A. Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov., showing discrete combs of few macrochaetae. B. Neoasterolepisma curtiseta Mendes, 1988, showing isolated macrochaetae inside a row of setulae. C. Ctenolepisma nicoletii (Lucas, 1846), with an irregular row of macrochaetae not clearly arranged in combs. Scale bars: A, C = 0.1 mm; B = 50 μm.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFC3F762FF706FE721EDA8FD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635026/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635026	Fig. 16. Types of macrochaetae in Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802. A. Micrograph of smooth bifid macrochaetae on the mandible of Allacrotelsa kraepelini (Escherich, 1905). B. Comb of smooth and apically bifid macrochaetae of Anisolepisma aquilonaridum Smith, 2016, SEM photograph. C. Micrograph of feathered macrochaetae on the mandible of Ctenolepisma iranicum Molero, Kahrarian & Gaju, 2016. D. Feathered macrochaetae on the frontal area of the head of Hemitelsella transpectinata (Smith, 2015). E. Design of the smooth macrochetae with a round tip on the mandible of Mormisma peyerimhoffi (Silvestri, 1938), adapted from Silvestri (1938). F. Feathered/plumose macrochaeta of the cerci of Swalepisma mirabile Irish, 1988, SEM photograph. Scale bars: A, C–E = 0.1 mm; B, F = 20 μm.	Fig. 16. Types of macrochaetae in Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802. A. Micrograph of smooth bifid macrochaetae on the mandible of Allacrotelsa kraepelini (Escherich, 1905). B. Comb of smooth and apically bifid macrochaetae of Anisolepisma aquilonaridum Smith, 2016, SEM photograph. C. Micrograph of feathered macrochaetae on the mandible of Ctenolepisma iranicum Molero, Kahrarian & Gaju, 2016. D. Feathered macrochaetae on the frontal area of the head of Hemitelsella transpectinata (Smith, 2015). E. Design of the smooth macrochetae with a round tip on the mandible of Mormisma peyerimhoffi (Silvestri, 1938), adapted from Silvestri (1938). F. Feathered/plumose macrochaeta of the cerci of Swalepisma mirabile Irish, 1988, SEM photograph. Scale bars: A, C–E = 0.1 mm; B, F = 20 μm.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFC3F762FF706FE721EDA8FD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635002/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635002	Fig. 5. Chaetotaxy of thoracic nota of Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802. A. Pronotum with setal collar (sc) of Psammolepisma schultzei (Silvestri, 1908), with lateral combs of macrochaetae (lc). Adapted from Irish (1988). Abbreviations: plc = posterolateral comb of macrochaetae, in this case inserted in a very lateral position of the posterior margin; pt = posterior trichobothrium, associated to the last lateral comb (N); the anterior trichobothrium is associated with the antepenultimate lateral comb (N–2). B. Pronotum with bare anterior margin of Neoasterolepisma balcanicum (Stach, 1922), without lateral combs of macrochaetae, only marginal setae (ms). Adapted from Molero-Baltanás et al. (1997). Abbreviations: ata = anterior open trichobothrial areas (the posterior ones are also open in this genus); ps = setulae associated with the posterior margin (in species of Tricholepisma these setae are transformed into macrochaetae: bigger and bifid apically). C. Micrograph of the left anterolateral corner of the pronotum of Allacrotelsa kraepelini, with 1+1 anterolateral groups of macrochaetae, marked with an arrow (and the remaining anterior margin bare). Scale bars = 0.2 mm.	Fig. 5. Chaetotaxy of thoracic nota of Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802. A. Pronotum with setal collar (sc) of Psammolepisma schultzei (Silvestri, 1908), with lateral combs of macrochaetae (lc). Adapted from Irish (1988). Abbreviations: plc = posterolateral comb of macrochaetae, in this case inserted in a very lateral position of the posterior margin; pt = posterior trichobothrium, associated to the last lateral comb (N); the anterior trichobothrium is associated with the antepenultimate lateral comb (N–2). B. Pronotum with bare anterior margin of Neoasterolepisma balcanicum (Stach, 1922), without lateral combs of macrochaetae, only marginal setae (ms). Adapted from Molero-Baltanás et al. (1997). Abbreviations: ata = anterior open trichobothrial areas (the posterior ones are also open in this genus); ps = setulae associated with the posterior margin (in species of Tricholepisma these setae are transformed into macrochaetae: bigger and bifid apically). C. Micrograph of the left anterolateral corner of the pronotum of Allacrotelsa kraepelini, with 1+1 anterolateral groups of macrochaetae, marked with an arrow (and the remaining anterior margin bare). Scale bars = 0.2 mm.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFC3F762FF706FE721EDA8FD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635024/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635024	Fig. 15. Scales on appendages of Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802, variability in shape and distribution pattern. A–B. Fan-shaped scales on antennae of Stylifera gigantea (Escherich, 1905), with light microscope (A) and with SEM (B). C. Tibial scales of Acrotelsella sp. from Australia, similar to those of the femur. D. Tibial scales of Stylifera gigantea from Venezuela. E–F. Scales on cerci of Ctenolepisma lineatum (Fabricius, 1775) (E) and Stylifera gigantea (F). Scale bars: A, E–F = 0.1 mm; B, D = 0.2 mm; C = 0.5 mm.	Fig. 15. Scales on appendages of Lepismatidae Latreille, 1802, variability in shape and distribution pattern. A–B. Fan-shaped scales on antennae of Stylifera gigantea (Escherich, 1905), with light microscope (A) and with SEM (B). C. Tibial scales of Acrotelsella sp. from Australia, similar to those of the femur. D. Tibial scales of Stylifera gigantea from Venezuela. E–F. Scales on cerci of Ctenolepisma lineatum (Fabricius, 1775) (E) and Stylifera gigantea (F). Scale bars: A, E–F = 0.1 mm; B, D = 0.2 mm; C = 0.5 mm.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFC3F762FF706FE721EDA8FD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635008/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635008	Fig. 7. Trichobothrial areas, SEM photographs. A. Open trichobothrial areas of the pronotum of Sceletolepisma guadianicum (Mendes, 1992); the anterior area is visible in the upper part of the photo, and the posterior area is placed in the lower part. B. Closed trichobothrial area of Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov. (formerly Acrotelsella impudica). Scale bars: A = 0.2 mm; B = 50 μm.	Fig. 7. Trichobothrial areas, SEM photographs. A. Open trichobothrial areas of the pronotum of Sceletolepisma guadianicum (Mendes, 1992); the anterior area is visible in the upper part of the photo, and the posterior area is placed in the lower part. B. Closed trichobothrial area of Caribesella impudica (Escherich, 1905) comb. nov. (formerly Acrotelsella impudica). Scale bars: A = 0.2 mm; B = 50 μm.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFFAF761FF276F0B276BADEF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635034/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635034	Fig. 20. World distribution of representatives of the subfamily Acrotelsatinae Mendes, 1991.	Fig. 20. World distribution of representatives of the subfamily Acrotelsatinae Mendes, 1991.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFFAF761FF276FF92776AFE4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635036/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635036	Fig. 21. World distribution of representatives of the subfamily Ctenolepismatinae Mendes, 1991.	Fig. 21. World distribution of representatives of the subfamily Ctenolepismatinae Mendes, 1991.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFFAF76FFF276A03210FAD7A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635038/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635038	Fig. 22. World distribution of representatives of the subfamily Heterolepismatinae Mendes, 1991.	Fig. 22. World distribution of representatives of the subfamily Heterolepismatinae Mendes, 1991.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFF4F76FFF276F6E2010AE9C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635040/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635040	Fig. 23. World distribution of representatives of the subfamily Lepismatinae Latreille, 1802.	Fig. 23. World distribution of representatives of the subfamily Lepismatinae Latreille, 1802.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFF4F76FFF276CCB23B0AF17.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635042/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635042	Fig. 24. World distribution of representatives of the subfamily Mirolepismatinae Mendes, 1991.	Fig. 24. World distribution of representatives of the subfamily Mirolepismatinae Mendes, 1991.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
03D11A22FFF4F76FFF276D532188AFEC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12635044/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12635044	Fig. 25. World distribution of representatives of the subfamily Silvestrellatinae Mendes, 1991.	Fig. 25. World distribution of representatives of the subfamily Silvestrellatinae Mendes, 1991.	2024-06-28	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.		Zenodo	biologists	Molero-Baltanás, Rafael;Gaju-Ricart, Miquel;Smith, Graeme B.			
