taxonID	type	description	language	source
DBE60E4D7847D79E0DD9228F068EDD63.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Mistaria jaundea comb. nov. and M. nairobii have the retrolateral tibial apophysis to lateral tibial apophysis ratio as 3: 1 (see fig. 2 B in Kioko et al. 2018; Fig. 1 B). They can, however, be distinguished by the absence of an embolic outgrowth in M. jaundea comb. nov. (see fig. 2 B in Kioko et al. 2018; Fig. 1 B). M. jaundea can be separated from M. nyeupenyeusi by body size and coloration which is smaller and black and white in M. nyeupenyeusi (see fig. 6 A in Kioko et al. 2018) compared to medium and cream-yellow in M. jaundea comb. nov. (Fig. 12 D).	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
DBE60E4D7847D79E0DD9228F068EDD63.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Cameroon (Fig. 13).	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
0E608B62DA13412DE2389651FCF20328.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. Holotype ♀, Rwanda, 1907 (SMF 9907948); Palp, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kessenji, 1 ♂, September 1907 (SMF 9907948: microscopic slide, left palp).	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
0E608B62DA13412DE2389651FCF20328.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Mistaria jumbo comb. nov. can be distinguished from the type M. leucopyga by the shape of the anterior lobe of the epigyne which has an extended inward growth lacking in the former species (Fig. 2 B). The male of this species can be distinguished from other Mistaria species by having two embolic outgrowths (Fig. 3 A) whereas M. leucopyga and M. nairobii have a single embolic outgrowth while in M. nyeupenyeusi it is absent (see fig. 1 in Santos and van Harten 2007; figs 2 B, 5 E in Kioko et al. 2018).	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
0E608B62DA13412DE2389651FCF20328.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Democratic Republic of the Congo, Rwanda (Fig. 13).	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
072C33FDD7F6A385419E0C28CAD97384.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. M. keniana comb. nov. can be separated from M. leucopyga by the absence of a septum and smaller copulatory ducts in the latter species (see figs 3, 4 in Santos and van Harten 2007) compared to a septum present and larger copulatory ducts in the former species (Fig. 4 A, B). It can be distinguished from M. fagei by the posteriorly projected and heavily sclerotized copulatory ducts (see fig. 1 B in Kioko et al. 2018) compared to centrally protruding and lightly sclerotized in M. keniana comb. nov. (Fig. 4 B) and also by the ovoid anterior lobe compared to round lobe in the former species.	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
072C33FDD7F6A385419E0C28CAD97384.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Kenya (Fig. 13).	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
A56750A848D5103723BAC3BD7745F2B5.taxon	materials_examined	Other material examined. Rwanda, 2 ♀, 1953, Coll. C. F. Roewer (SMF 9907841; 9907951).	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
A56750A848D5103723BAC3BD7745F2B5.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. M. kiboschensis comb. nov. can be distinguished from M. leucopyga by the larger copulatory ducts (Fig. 5 B) compared to reduced ones in the latter (see fig. 4 in Santos and van Harten 2007). It can also be separated by the missing white spot posteriorly on the dorsal side of the abdomen (Fig. 12 A) which is present in M. leucopyga (see fig. 5 a in Roewer 1955). This species can also be separated from M. moschiensis comb. nov. by the shape of the median lobe which is small and round in M. kiboschensis comb. nov. (Fig. 5 B) compared to larger and ovoid in M. moschiensis comb. nov. (Fig. 7 B). The copulatory duct originates posteriorly and is projected centrally in M. kiboschensis comb. nov. (Fig. 5 B) compared to central origin and anteriorly projected in M. moschiensis comb. nov. (Fig. 7 B).	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
A56750A848D5103723BAC3BD7745F2B5.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Central & East Africa (Fig. 13).	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
4138C168855061FE9967831A899002FA.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. M. lawrencei comb. nov. and M. mossambica comb. nov. share characteristics such as the shape of the anterior lobe, triangular centrally projected copulatory ducts and wide concave epigyne anterior delimiting edge (Figs 6 B, 8 B). The two species can be distinguished by the shape of the epigynal teeth which are thick in M. lawerencei comb. nov. (Fig. 6 A) compared and slender in M. mossambica comb. nov. (Fig. 8 A). The copulatory ducts are also large and close together in M. mossambica comb. nov. (Fig. 8 B) compared to smaller and further apart in M. lawrencei comb. nov. (Fig. 6 B). The two species can also be separated by the length to width size ratio of the epigyne which is 0.6: 0.6 in M. lawrencei compared to 0.7: 0.5 in M. mossambica comb. nov.	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
4138C168855061FE9967831A899002FA.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Zimbabwe (Fig. 13).	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
A796A8A0B0D1DE17A801DCBF72F60D08.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Males of the genus Mistaria can be separated from those of Agelena by the presence of a large translucent fulcrum in the former species (Fig. 1 B) which is absent in Agelena species; a spine-like embolus and thumb-like conductor in Mistaria (Fig. 1 B) compared to a short, thick and grooved conductor in Agelena species (see fig. 5 in Zhang et al. 2005). Females can be separated by the absence of spermathecal apophysis in Mistaria (Fig. 2 A) and absence of epigynal teeth in the females of Agelena (see fig. 3 in Zhang et al. 2005). Mistaria shares similarities with three other genera from the subfamily Ageleninae i. e Agelescape Levy, 1996, Hololena Chamberlin & Gertsch, 1929 and Rualena Chamberlin & Ivie, 1942. The shared characters include the presence of a fulcrum in the palp of males and epigine teeth in the females (Lehtinen 1967; Maya-Morales and Jimenez 2016). Males of Mistaria can be distinguished from those of Agelescape by the absence of a tegular apophysis between the conductor and the median apophysis and two patella apophyses present in Mistaria (see fig. 1 in Guseinov et al. 2005; Fig. 1 B, C); from the males of Hololena by the presence of a patella apophysis which is absent in the latter (Fig. 1 C) and from the males of Rualena by the absence of conductor projections in the former genus (see fig. 12 in Maya-Morales and Jimenez 2016). Females of Mistaria can be separated from those of Agelescape by the absence of a scape found in the latter genus (see fig. 13 in Guseinov et al. 2005); from those of Hololena by the more posterior position in the epigynal teeth in the latter genus (see fig. 8 in Chamberlin and Ivie 1942) and from those of Rualena by the absence of copulatory openings and hyaline spurs in the former genus (see fig. 40 in Maya-Morales and Jimenez 2016).	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
A796A8A0B0D1DE17A801DCBF72F60D08.taxon	description	Description. See Kioko et al. 2018: 112	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
49E103F1FA36D860D3E7B672EE8F9DDE.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. M. longimamillata comb. nov. and M. zorica have the distal segment of posterior spinnerets twice the size of the anterior spinnerets. The two species can be distinguished by the swollen tarsi of the palp in M. longimamillata comb. nov (Fig. 12 K, L) compared to straight in M. zorica (see fig. 4 C in Kioko et al. 2018). M. zorica is also smaller compared to the medium sized M. longimamillata comb. nov.	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
49E103F1FA36D860D3E7B672EE8F9DDE.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Mozambique (Fig. 13).	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
83EDFFDF2884046889C23DAA7993674C.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. M. moschiensis comb. nov. and M. kiboschensis both have horizontally ovoid anterior lobes of the spermatheca and deep concave epigyne anterior delimiting edges (Figs 5 B, 7 B). They can be distinguished by the position of the copulatory ducts which are of central origin but protruding anteriorly in M. moschiensis comb. nov. (Fig. 7 B) compared to posterior origin and projected centrally in M. kiboschensis (Fig. 5 B). The shape of the median lobe is small and round in M. kiboschensis (Fig. 5 B) compared to larger and ovoid in M. moschiensis comb. nov (Fig. 7 B).	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
83EDFFDF2884046889C23DAA7993674C.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Tanzania (Fig. 13).	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
07C1805E8EAA7D4D9A935AFBE1C1DE2F.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. M. mossambica comb. nov. strongly resembles M. lawrencei by sharing similar characters such as the shapes of the anterior lobe of the spermatheca and epigyne anterior delimiting edge and position of copulatory ducts (Figs 6 B, 8 B). The two species can be distinguished by the shape of the epigynal teeth which are thick in M. lawerencei (Fig. 6 A) compared to slender in M. mossambica comb. nov. (Fig. 8 A). The copulatory duct is also large and close together in M. mossambica comb. nov. (Fig. 8 B) compared to smaller and further apart in M. lawrencei (Fig. 6 B). These two species can also be separated by the length to width size ratio of the epigyne which is 0.6: 0.6 in M. lawrencei compared to 0.7: 0.5 in M. mossambica comb. nov.	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
07C1805E8EAA7D4D9A935AFBE1C1DE2F.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Mozambique (Fig. 13).	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
BF76AEFB4FD0E3D0D0A778DE520E8D9B.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. M. nyassana comb. nov. can be distinguished from M. zorica and M. zuluana comb. nov. by the shape of the anterior lobe which is cichlid fish-shaped in this species (Fig. 9 B) compared to ovoid in the latter two species (see fig. 4 B in Kioko et al. 2018) and the absence of a septum in the former species which is present in M. zorica (see fig. 4 A, B in Kioko et al. 2018; Figs 9 B, 11 B). M. nyassana comb. nov. can also be distinguished from M. zuluana comb. nov. by the shape and distance of copulatory ducts which are reduced and further apart in M. nyassana comb. nov. (Fig. 9 B) compared to clearly visible and close together in the latter species (Fig. 11 B).	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
BF76AEFB4FD0E3D0D0A778DE520E8D9B.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Malawi (Fig. 13).	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
9196A80090DBC645D7EA5E5B73CCA01A.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Mistaria teteana comb. nov. can be distinguished from M. nairobii by the size ratio of the retrolateral tibial apophysis to lateral tibial apophysis which is 5: 1 (Fig. 10 B) compared to 3: 1 in the latter (see fig. 2 B in Kioko et al. 2018). It can be separated from M. leucopyga by the thick and rounded cymbium (Fig. 10 A, B) compared to long and slender in the latter species (see figs 1, 2 in Santos and van Harten 2007).	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
9196A80090DBC645D7EA5E5B73CCA01A.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Mozambique (Fig. 13).	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
48BD2F4D2E10569DA1AEEC4625F1061B.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. M. zuluana comb. nov. and M. nyassana have similarly shaped epigyne anterior delimiting edge (Figs 9 A, 11 A) and almost equal size (Fig. 12 H, J). However, M. zuluana comb. nov. can be distinguished from M. nyassana by the shape and distance of copulatory ducts which are clearly visible and close together in M. zuluana comb. nov. (Fig. 11 B) compared to reduced and further apart in M. nyassana (Fig. 9 B).	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
48BD2F4D2E10569DA1AEEC4625F1061B.taxon	distribution	Distribution. South Africa (Fig. 13).	en	Kioko, Grace M., Jaeger, Peter, Kioko, Esther N., Ji, Li-Qiang, Li, Shuqiang (2019): On the species of the genus Mistaria Lehtinen, 1967 studied by Roewer (1955) from Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). African Invertebrates 60 (1): 109-132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.60.34359
