taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03DB7724E2048361FC8DFA98FB12FCEB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5290989/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5290989	Figure 3. Dugesia effusa Sluys sp. nov. Dorsal view of preserved specimen.	Figure 3. Dugesia effusa Sluys sp. nov. Dorsal view of preserved specimen.	2013-10-29	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta		Zenodo	biologists	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta			
03DB7724E2048361FC8DFA98FB12FCEB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5290991/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5290991	Figures 4, 5. Dugesia effusa Sluys sp. nov. 4. ZMA V.Pl. 7114.2. Sagittal reconstruction of the copulatory apparatus. 5. ZMA V.Pl. 7114.1. Sagittal reconstruction of the copulatory apparatus.	Figures 4, 5. Dugesia effusa Sluys sp. nov. 4. ZMA V.Pl. 7114.2. Sagittal reconstruction of the copulatory apparatus. 5. ZMA V.Pl. 7114.1. Sagittal reconstruction of the copulatory apparatus.	2013-10-29	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta		Zenodo	biologists	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta			
03DB7724E2048361FC8DFA98FB12FCEB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5290985/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5290985	Figure 2. Result of the GMYC analysis. Threshold-delimiting speciation and coalescent processes plotted as a broken line. Numbers indicate molecular-based entities; labels correspond to species names. Entities in green show correspondence between the molecular species delimitation method and the morphologically identified species. In orange are shown groupings where there is conflict between morphological and molecular methods. In blue are shown the groupings for which only molecular data are available.	Figure 2. Result of the GMYC analysis. Threshold-delimiting speciation and coalescent processes plotted as a broken line. Numbers indicate molecular-based entities; labels correspond to species names. Entities in green show correspondence between the molecular species delimitation method and the morphologically identified species. In orange are shown groupings where there is conflict between morphological and molecular methods. In blue are shown the groupings for which only molecular data are available.	2013-10-29	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta		Zenodo	biologists	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta			
03DB7724E20B8364FCBCFC5EFB38FD73.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5290993/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5290993	Figure 6. Dugesia improvisa Sluys & Solà sp. nov. Dorsal view of preserved specimen.	Figure 6. Dugesia improvisa Sluys & Solà sp. nov. Dorsal view of preserved specimen.	2013-10-29	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta		Zenodo	biologists	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta			
03DB7724E20B8364FCBCFC5EFB38FD73.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5290997/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5290997	Figures 7, 8. Dugesia improvisa Sluys & Solà sp. nov. 7. ZMA V.Pl. 7116.2. Sagittal reconstruction of the copulatory apparatus. 8. ZMA V.Pl. 7116.1. Sagittal reconstruction of the copulatory apparatus.	Figures 7, 8. Dugesia improvisa Sluys & Solà sp. nov. 7. ZMA V.Pl. 7116.2. Sagittal reconstruction of the copulatory apparatus. 8. ZMA V.Pl. 7116.1. Sagittal reconstruction of the copulatory apparatus.	2013-10-29	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta		Zenodo	biologists	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta			
03DB7724E20B8364FCBCFC5EFB38FD73.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5290999/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5290999	Figure 9. Dugesia improvisa Sluys & Solà sp. nov. Photomicrograph of penial complex of specimen ZMA V.Pl. 7116.4, showing the sickle-shaped flap of tissue or secretion.	Figure 9. Dugesia improvisa Sluys & Solà sp. nov. Photomicrograph of penial complex of specimen ZMA V.Pl. 7116.4, showing the sickle-shaped flap of tissue or secretion.	2013-10-29	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta		Zenodo	biologists	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta			
03DB7724E20B8364FCBCFC5EFB38FD73.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5290985/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5290985	Figure 2. Result of the GMYC analysis. Threshold-delimiting speciation and coalescent processes plotted as a broken line. Numbers indicate molecular-based entities; labels correspond to species names. Entities in green show correspondence between the molecular species delimitation method and the morphologically identified species. In orange are shown groupings where there is conflict between morphological and molecular methods. In blue are shown the groupings for which only molecular data are available.	Figure 2. Result of the GMYC analysis. Threshold-delimiting speciation and coalescent processes plotted as a broken line. Numbers indicate molecular-based entities; labels correspond to species names. Entities in green show correspondence between the molecular species delimitation method and the morphologically identified species. In orange are shown groupings where there is conflict between morphological and molecular methods. In blue are shown the groupings for which only molecular data are available.	2013-10-29	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta		Zenodo	biologists	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta			
03DB7724E20E8367FC4AFD02FD33FC0C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5291001/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5291001	Figure 10. Dugesia naiadis Sluys sp. nov. Dorsal view of preserved specimen.	Figure 10. Dugesia naiadis Sluys sp. nov. Dorsal view of preserved specimen.	2013-10-29	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta		Zenodo	biologists	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta			
03DB7724E20E8367FC4AFD02FD33FC0C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5291003/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5291003	Figures 11, 12. Dugesia naiadis Sluys sp. nov. 11. ZMA V.Pl. 7117.2. Sagittal reconstruction of the copulatory apparatus. 12. ZMA V.Pl. 7117.1. Sagittal reconstruction of the copulatory apparatus.	Figures 11, 12. Dugesia naiadis Sluys sp. nov. 11. ZMA V.Pl. 7117.2. Sagittal reconstruction of the copulatory apparatus. 12. ZMA V.Pl. 7117.1. Sagittal reconstruction of the copulatory apparatus.	2013-10-29	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta		Zenodo	biologists	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta			
03DB7724E20E8367FC4AFD02FD33FC0C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5290983/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5290983	Figure 1. Bayesian tree inferred from the concatenated data set (COI + 18S). Labels correspond to species names. Node numbers correspond to bootstrap (ML)/posterior probability (BI); values are only indicated when>50/>0.80; ‘*’ indicates maximum support. The scale bar indicates substitutions per site.	Figure 1. Bayesian tree inferred from the concatenated data set (COI + 18S). Labels correspond to species names. Node numbers correspond to bootstrap (ML)/posterior probability (BI); values are only indicated when>50/>0.80; ‘*’ indicates maximum support. The scale bar indicates substitutions per site.	2013-10-29	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta		Zenodo	biologists	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta			
03DB7724E20E8367FC4AFD02FD33FC0C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5290985/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5290985	Figure 2. Result of the GMYC analysis. Threshold-delimiting speciation and coalescent processes plotted as a broken line. Numbers indicate molecular-based entities; labels correspond to species names. Entities in green show correspondence between the molecular species delimitation method and the morphologically identified species. In orange are shown groupings where there is conflict between morphological and molecular methods. In blue are shown the groupings for which only molecular data are available.	Figure 2. Result of the GMYC analysis. Threshold-delimiting speciation and coalescent processes plotted as a broken line. Numbers indicate molecular-based entities; labels correspond to species names. Entities in green show correspondence between the molecular species delimitation method and the morphologically identified species. In orange are shown groupings where there is conflict between morphological and molecular methods. In blue are shown the groupings for which only molecular data are available.	2013-10-29	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta		Zenodo	biologists	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta			
03DB7724E20D8378FF18FBFEFF1DF8BB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5297137/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5297137	Figure 13. Dugesia parasagitta Sluys & Solà sp. nov. Photomicrograph of large dorsal penial fold in specimen ZMA V.Pl. 7118.1.	Figure 13. Dugesia parasagitta Sluys & Solà sp. nov. Photomicrograph of large dorsal penial fold in specimen ZMA V.Pl. 7118.1.	2013-10-29	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta		Zenodo	biologists	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta			
03DB7724E20D8378FF18FBFEFF1DF8BB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5290985/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5290985	Figure 2. Result of the GMYC analysis. Threshold-delimiting speciation and coalescent processes plotted as a broken line. Numbers indicate molecular-based entities; labels correspond to species names. Entities in green show correspondence between the molecular species delimitation method and the morphologically identified species. In orange are shown groupings where there is conflict between morphological and molecular methods. In blue are shown the groupings for which only molecular data are available.	Figure 2. Result of the GMYC analysis. Threshold-delimiting speciation and coalescent processes plotted as a broken line. Numbers indicate molecular-based entities; labels correspond to species names. Entities in green show correspondence between the molecular species delimitation method and the morphologically identified species. In orange are shown groupings where there is conflict between morphological and molecular methods. In blue are shown the groupings for which only molecular data are available.	2013-10-29	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta		Zenodo	biologists	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta			
03DB7724E212837AFC88FC1AFBC7F8BB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5297139/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5297139	Figure 14. Recurva postrema Sluys & Solà sp. nov. Photograph of external features (scale bar not available).	Figure 14. Recurva postrema Sluys & Solà sp. nov. Photograph of external features (scale bar not available).	2013-10-29	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta		Zenodo	biologists	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta			
03DB7724E212837AFC88FC1AFBC7F8BB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5297141/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5297141	Figures 15, 16. Recurva postrema Sluys & Solà sp. nov. 15. ZMA V.Pl. 7122.4. Sagittal reconstruction of the copulatory apparatus. 16. ZMA V.Pl. 7122.1. Sagittal reconstruction of the copulatory apparatus.	Figures 15, 16. Recurva postrema Sluys & Solà sp. nov. 15. ZMA V.Pl. 7122.4. Sagittal reconstruction of the copulatory apparatus. 16. ZMA V.Pl. 7122.1. Sagittal reconstruction of the copulatory apparatus.	2013-10-29	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta		Zenodo	biologists	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta			
03DB7724E211837CFF20FF18FE18FA35.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5297143/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5297143	Figure 17. Recurva conjuncta Sluys sp. nov. ZMA V.Pl. 7123.1. Sagittal reconstruction of the copulatory apparatus.	Figure 17. Recurva conjuncta Sluys sp. nov. ZMA V.Pl. 7123.1. Sagittal reconstruction of the copulatory apparatus.	2013-10-29	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta		Zenodo	biologists	Sluys, Ronald;Solà, Eduard;Gritzalis, Konstantinos;Vila-Farré, Miquel;Mateos, Eduardo;Riutort, Marta			
