identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03D9BD7CFFBD7727FF38A440FB88FE9A.text	03D9BD7CFFBD7727FF38A440FB88FE9A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Amphinominae Savigny	<div><p>Subfamily AMPHINOMINAE Savigny in Lamarck, 1818</p><p>Amphinomae Savigny in Lamarck,1818: 327.— Savigny 1822: 14, 57.</p><p>Amphinomidae – Baird 1868: 215. — M’Intosh 1885: 6. — Chamberlin 1919: 23. — Fauchald 1977: 100. — Kudenov 1993: 95.</p><p>Amphinominae – Borda et al. 2015: 330.</p><p>TYPE GENUS. — Amphinome Bruguière, 1789 .</p><p>DIAGNOSIS (modified from Borda et al. 2015). — Amphinomids with caruncle variable, rarely absent. Branchiae with single or double stems with filaments digitate; simple cirriform branchiae absent. Anus dorsoterminal on last chaetiger.</p><p>As indicated in the key, amphinomin genera are separated after several diagnostic features such as the type of caruncle, dorsal development of first chaetiger, presence of branchiae along body, alignment of neuropodia, and presence of special chaetae such as hooks or thin furcates.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D9BD7CFFBD7727FF38A440FB88FE9A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Bleeker, Joke;Harris, Leslie;Ten Hove, Harry A.;Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I.	Bleeker, Joke, Harris, Leslie, Ten Hove, Harry A., Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I. (2023): Pherecardites Horst, 1912 and Branchamphinome Hartman, 1967 are synonyms (Annelida, Amphinomidae, Amphinominae). Zoosystema 45 (13): 435-443, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema2023v45a13
03D9BD7CFFBD7725FC23A3A5FAE0F828.text	03D9BD7CFFBD7725FC23A3A5FAE0F828.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pherecardites Horst 1912	<div><p>Genus Pherecardites Horst, 1912</p><p>Pherecardites Horst, 1912: 33 .</p><p>Branchamphinome Hartman, 1967: 42 n. syn.</p><p>TYPE SPECIES. — Pherecardites parva Horst, 1912, by monotypy.</p><p>GENDER. — Feminine, after the epithet originally proposed for the type species, parva; Brown (1954: 590) indicates parvus is a Latin masculine adjective, meaning little or small ( parva feminine, parvum neuter (see below).</p><p>DIAGNOSIS. — Amphinominae with chaetiger 1 dorsally incomplete. Caruncle with a median ridge and separate, diverging lateral lobes. Branchiae from chaetiger 1. Neurochaetae spurred, with denticles along inner side.</p><p>REMARKS</p><p>Pherecardites Horst, 1912 was described without an illustration of the anterior end. Fauchald (1977) included Pherecardites Horst, 1912 in his key to all genera; however, Fauchald regarded the body shape of Branchamphinome as oval, whereas for Pherecardites it was assumed as rectangular. Nevertheless, Hartman (1967: 43) indicated the body shape of the type species, B. antarctica Hartman, 1967 changes during development: “Smaller individuals resemble the short Chloeia whereas longer ones are more like Eurythoe .” The latter has been regarded as having rectangular body.</p><p>Consequently, Pherecardites and Branchamphinome have the same body shape and types of chaetae. What about the caruncle? Horst (1912: 33) indicated “caruncle consisting of a median axis and some lateral lamellae, directed backwards.” And in describing the type species, P. parva, a few lines below, he wrote: “its caruncle extends over three segments and consists of a median axis and four lateral lobes, directed backwards.” Hartman (1967: 43) indicated, in the description of the type species, B. antarctica, “the caruncle is tripartite, consisting of a larger, longer median lobe with lateral branches, and a pair of shorter lateral lobes […]” These two descriptions indicate a very similar shape, and after the study of type specimens, the two genera are herein regarded as synonyms.</p><p>Pherecardites Horst, 1912 might be regarded as a name applied to fossils (ICZN 1999, Art. 20) and consequently, it could not “be used as the valid name of a taxon”. Further, as indicated in the example given for the same article, the genus-group name might be available if proposed “for genus-group of taxa of fossils […] and not merely to indicate fossil members of genera of extant animals”. Horst (1912) proposed Pherecardites, forming the name after Pherecardia Horst, 1886, but he was not referring to any fossil members of the same group. Consequently, it cannot be rejected as a valid name.</p><p>There are a few instances where a similarly ending genus-group name has been regarded as valid, such as Tringites Cabanis in Gundlach, 1856 ( Aves, Scolopacidae), or Oceanites Keyserling &amp; Blasius, 1840 ( Aves, Hydrobatidae).On the other hand, Read &amp; Fauchald (2022) explained the etymology as: “The name of the genus is formed by the postposition of the suffix of Greek origin - ites, used to form adjectives, especially those to identify groups as ‘those belonging to’, to the name of the genus Pherecardia Horst, 1886, and seems to be used to indicate the resemblance of the new genus Pherecardites with Pheracardia.” On the other hand, the suffix - ites is “to be treated as masculine unless its author, when establishing the name, stated that it had another gender or treated it as such by combining it with an adjective species-group name in another gender form” (ICZN 1999, Art. 30.1.4.4). As indicated above, because Horst used the feminine ( parva) species-group name, the gender of the genus must be treated as feminine.</p><p>Hartman (1967) compared Branchamphinome with Benthoscolex Horst, 1912 because both have tripartite caruncle, and concluded they differ because the former has eyes, and branchiae from chaetiger 1, whereas the latter had no eyes, and branchiae from chaetiger 6. Kudenov (1993) modified the diagnosis but restricted the comparison to Benthoscolex . After Horst (1912) the presence of spurred neurochaetae with denticles along the inner side in Pherecardites resembles Hermodice, although some other genera also have this type of neurochaetae such as Benthoscolex, Linopherus de Quatrefages, 1866, Paramphinome Sars in Sars, 1872 and Pareurythoe Gustafson, 1930 . Horst likely restricted the comparison to Hermodice and Pherecardia because they also have complex caruncle, as opposed to those present in the other genera. Benthoscolex, however, has a caruncle with three longitudinal lobes directed posteriorly, but they rise from the same point, not from a single median ridge, as is the case in Pherecardites .</p><p>As currently redefined, Pherecardites Horst, 1912 includes Branchamphinome Hartman, 1967 . Consequently, the species described in the latter genus must be newly combined such that Pherecardites includes P. antarctica (Hartman, 1967) n. comb., P. islandica (Detinova, 1968) n. comb., P. kohtsukai (Jimi in Jimi et al. 2021) n. comb., P. parva Horst, 1912, P. quinquemaculata Augener, 1927, and P. tropicalis (Barroso, Ranauro &amp; Kudenov, 2017) n. comb.</p><p>KEY TO SPECIES OF PHERECARDITES HORST, 1912</p><p>(modified after Jimi et al. 2021)</p><p>1. Prostomium with eyes, sometimes coalescent; first branchiae with 3 or more filaments ............................ 2</p><p>— Prostomium with indistinct eyes; body pale; first branchiae with 1-2 filaments ........................................... .................................................................................................................. P. parva Horst, 1912, Indonesia</p><p>2(1). Median segments branchiae with 15-20 filaments; body colorless ............................................................... .................................. P. antarctica (Hartman, 1967) n. comb. (redescr. Kudenov 1993: 95), Antarctic Seas</p><p>— Median segments branchiae with 4-12 filaments; body variable ............................................................... 3</p><p>3(2). Body pale; eyes nearly coalescent, forming an 8-shaped spot ....................................................................... ...... P. islandica (Detinova, 1968) n. comb. (recorded as B. antarctica by Amoureux 1982: 34), NE Atlantic</p><p>— Body with dorsal pigmentation; eyes separate, not coalescent ................................................................... 4</p><p>4(3). Median branchiae with 4-8 filaments ....................................................................................................... 5</p><p>— Median segments with about 12 filaments; dorsal pigmentation includes 5 spots, three dorsal and two interramal .............................................................................. P. quinquemaculata Augener, 1927, New Zealand</p><p>5(4). Venter of first four chaetigers broadly pigmented, following segments pale ................................................. ................................................................................ P. kohtsukai (Jimi in Jimi et al., 2021) n. comb., Japan</p><p>— Venter with similar pigmentation along body .............................................................................................. ................................................... P. tropicalis (Barroso, Ranauro &amp; Kudenov, 2017) n. comb., SW Atlantic</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D9BD7CFFBD7725FC23A3A5FAE0F828	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Bleeker, Joke;Harris, Leslie;Ten Hove, Harry A.;Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I.	Bleeker, Joke, Harris, Leslie, Ten Hove, Harry A., Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I. (2023): Pherecardites Horst, 1912 and Branchamphinome Hartman, 1967 are synonyms (Annelida, Amphinomidae, Amphinominae). Zoosystema 45 (13): 435-443, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema2023v45a13
03D9BD7CFFBC7726FE3AA2EAFAE3FD9D.text	03D9BD7CFFBC7726FE3AA2EAFAE3FD9D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Amphinomidae Savigny in Lamarck 1818	<div><p>KEY TO SUBFAMILIES OF AMPHINOMIDAE SAVIGNY IN LAMARCK, 1818</p><p>REMARKS</p><p>Amphinomid subfamilies were proposed and defined by Borda et al. (2012, 2015). They were initially regarded as different clades, informally named after the body shape as fusiform vs rectangular (rectilinear). However, as indicated below, body shape changes during development and this explains why it is being regarded as an additional, non-diagnostic feature. The main difference relies in the type of branchiae, their stems, and branching pattern of branchial filaments. An additional relevant feature is the presence of cirriform branchiae along some anterior chaetigers, which is currently restricted to some archinomin genera.</p><p>1. Branchiae with single stem, branched, with filaments depressed or digitate, sometimes pinnate; single cirriform branchiae sometimes present in anterior chaetigers (body tapered or fusiform) .... Archinominae Kudenov, 1991</p><p>— Branchiae with single or double stems, with filaments digitate, never pinnate; single cirriform branchiae absent (body rectangular) ........................................................................ Amphinominae Savigny in Lamarck, 1818</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D9BD7CFFBC7726FE3AA2EAFAE3FD9D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Bleeker, Joke;Harris, Leslie;Ten Hove, Harry A.;Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I.	Bleeker, Joke, Harris, Leslie, Ten Hove, Harry A., Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I. (2023): Pherecardites Horst, 1912 and Branchamphinome Hartman, 1967 are synonyms (Annelida, Amphinomidae, Amphinominae). Zoosystema 45 (13): 435-443, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema2023v45a13
03D9BD7CFFBC7726FE22A0B9FAE3F828.text	03D9BD7CFFBC7726FE22A0B9FAE3F828.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Amphinominae Savigny	<div><p>KEY TO GENERA OF AMPHINOMINAE SAVIGNY IN LAMARCK, 1818 (MODIFIED FROM SUN &amp; LI 2017)</p><p>REMARKS</p><p>Paramphinome Sars, 1869 is a nomen nudum because it was included in a species list (Sars 1869); the genus and species were published posthumously by his son (Sars 1872).</p><p>1. Caruncle present, variably developed; neuropodia lateral; neurochaetae non-retractile ............................. 2</p><p>— Caruncle absent; neuropodia ventral; neurochaetae retractile ..... Hipponoe Audouin &amp; Milne-Edwards, 1830</p><p>2(1). Branchiae present on all chaetigers, starting from chaetiger 1 ................................................................... 3</p><p>— Branchiae missing in some chaetigers, starting from anterior chaetigers (not from the first) ..................... 4</p><p>3(2). Caruncle with a median ridge, concealing lateral plates, never with digitate lobes; spurred neurochaetae without denticles ............................................................................................ Eurythoe Kinberg, 1857 (partim)</p><p>— Caruncle with a median ridge and up to four lateral digitate lobes directed posteriorly; spurred neurochaetae with denticles along inner side .................................................................................................................... ............................................ Pherecardites Horst, 1912 (incl. Branchamphinome Hartman, 1967, see above)</p><p>4(2). Branchiae present from chaetiger 2-4; eyes commonly present ................................................................. 5</p><p>— Branchiae present from chaetiger 6; eyes absent; caruncle with a median ridge and smooth lateral lobes ..... ............................................................................................................................. Benthoscolex Horst, 1912</p><p>5(4). Chaetiger 1 dorsally continuous, complete ............................................................................................... 6</p><p>— Chaetiger 1 dorsally discontinuous, incomplete ....................................................................................... 7</p><p>6(5). Chaetiger 1 with stout, falcate notohooks; caruncle round, sessile, without free lateral wings; neurochaetae bifurcates; harpoon notochaetae with 1 row of denticles .......................... Paramphinome Sars in Sars, 1872</p><p>— Chaetiger 1 without notohooks; caruncle stalked, broadly triangular to chordate with free lateral wings; neurochaetae falcate, unidentate; harpoon notochaetae with up to 2 rows of denticles ... Amphinome Bruguière, 1789</p><p>7(5). Caruncle small, not extended beyond one chaetiger ................................................................................. 8</p><p>— Caruncle large, extended posteriorly beyond more than one chaetiger ..................................................... 9</p><p>8(7). Branchiae present on almost all chaetigers .............. Cryptonome Borda, Kudenov, Bienhold &amp; Rouse, 2012</p><p>— Branchiae restricted to anterior chaetigers ................................................ Linopherus de Quatrefages, 1866</p><p>9(8). Caruncle narrow, longer than wide, with a median ridge ....................................................................... 10</p><p>— Caruncle wide, often longer than wide, or wider than long; branchiae from chaetiger 1 ......................... 12</p><p>10(9). Caruncle median ridge concealing lateral lobes (visible in lateral view) .................................................. 11</p><p>— Caruncle without lateral lobes; branchiae from chaetigers 2-3 ........................ Pareurythoe Gustafson, 1930</p><p>11(10).Bifurcate neurochaetae short, thick, shorter tine 0.5-4.0 times longer than handle width; branchiae present from chaetigers 2-4 .................................................................................. Eurythoe Kinberg, 1857 (partim)</p><p>— Bifurcate neurochaetae long, thin, shorter tine 10-15 times longer than handle width; branchiae present from chaetiger 4 ....................................................................................................... Alleurythoe Sun &amp; Li, 2017</p><p>12(9). Caruncle as long as wide, with a median ridge, with series of foliose lateral lobes ..... Pherecardia Horst, 1886</p><p>— Caruncle slightly longer than wide, without median ridge .................................. Hermodice Kinberg, 1857</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D9BD7CFFBC7726FE22A0B9FAE3F828	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Bleeker, Joke;Harris, Leslie;Ten Hove, Harry A.;Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I.	Bleeker, Joke, Harris, Leslie, Ten Hove, Harry A., Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I. (2023): Pherecardites Horst, 1912 and Branchamphinome Hartman, 1967 are synonyms (Annelida, Amphinomidae, Amphinominae). Zoosystema 45 (13): 435-443, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema2023v45a13
03D9BD7CFFBF7724FC21A024FB8BF98F.text	03D9BD7CFFBF7724FC21A024FB8BF98F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pherecardites parva Horst 1912	<div><p>Pherecardites parva Horst, 1912</p><p>(Fig. 1)</p><p>Pherecardites parva Horst, 1912: 33, pl. 9, figs 17-19. — Bleeker &amp; van der Spoel 1992: 152 (lectotype designation).</p><p>TYPE MATERIAL. — Indonesia. Lectotype • 1 specimen; RV Siboga; Sta. 122; 01°58.5’N, 125°0.5’E; 1264- 1165 m depth; 17.VII.1899; ZMA V.Pol 1072.1.g.</p><p>PARALECTOTYPES. — Indonesia • 1 specimen; RV Siboga; Sta. 139; 00°11’S, 127°25’E; 397 m depth; 4.VIII.1899; ZMA V.Pol. 1072.2 • 1 specimen; RV Siboga; Sta. 173; 03°27’S, 131°0.5’E; 567 m depth; 28.VIII.1889; ZMA V.Pol. 1072.3 .</p><p>DISTRIBUTION. — Indonesia, in sediments at 397-1264 m water depth.</p><p>OBSERVATIONS</p><p>Lectotype (ZMA V.Pol 1072.1) colorless, without posterior region, bent ventrally, breaking in two (Fig. 1A). Body about 10 mm long, 2.5 mm wide, 30 chaetigers. Prostomium (Fig. 1B) slightly eroded, left lateral antenna lost, right one present, inserted close to median antennal base. Median antenna thick, bent laterally, without tip. 2/3 as long as caruncle. Palps lost. Eyes not seen. Caruncle straight, with a median ridge and 4 digitate lateral lobes, directed posteriorly. Branchiae from chaetiger 1 lost; chaetiger 2 with 2 digitate filaments, in anterior chaetigers branchiae with about 5 filaments. Pharynx not exposed (Fig. 1C). Posterior end lost; pygidial features unknown.</p><p>REMARKS</p><p>Horst (1912: 33) did not see eyes in his specimens (longest one slightly more than 7 mm in length) but noted some black spots. Kudenov (1993: 96-97) noted in P. antarctica (Hartman, 1967) n. comb., specimens of different size (8-12 mm long) had eyes well developed and their pigments were retained despite being in ethanol for over 30 years, whereas in P. parva eyes were not seen. Horst (1912: 33) characterized the caruncle in the diagnosis for Pherecardites, and in the description of P. parva, as having a median ridge and lateral lamellae, directed posteriorly, extended along three segments. Branchiae were noted as starting in chaetiger 1 but the number of filaments was not given. Likewise, the presence of branchiae along posterior chaetigers was not indicated, nor the shape of the posterior end.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D9BD7CFFBF7724FC21A024FB8BF98F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Bleeker, Joke;Harris, Leslie;Ten Hove, Harry A.;Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I.	Bleeker, Joke, Harris, Leslie, Ten Hove, Harry A., Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I. (2023): Pherecardites Horst, 1912 and Branchamphinome Hartman, 1967 are synonyms (Annelida, Amphinomidae, Amphinominae). Zoosystema 45 (13): 435-443, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema2023v45a13
03D9BD7CFFBE772AFCCBA4A0FD76FC93.text	03D9BD7CFFBE772AFCCBA4A0FD76FC93.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pherecardites antarctica (Hartman 1976) Bleeker & Harris & Ten & Hove & Salazar-Vallejo 2023	<div><p>Pherecardites antarctica (Hartman, 1976) n. comb.</p><p>(Fig. 2)</p><p>Branchamphinome antarctica Hartman, 1967: 42, pl. 12, fig. A (anterior end). — Kudenov 1993: 95, figs 1, 2 (redescr.).</p><p>TYPE MATERIAL. — Antarctica. Not seen (examined and redescribed by Kudenov 1993) .</p><p>ADDITIONAL MATERIAL. — Antarctica • 1 specimen; RV <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-129.76666&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-54.833332" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -129.76666/lat -54.833332)">Eltanin</a>; Sta. 1346; 54°49’ to 54°50’S, 129°48’ to 129°46’W; 549 m depth; 7.XI.1964; LACM .</p><p>DISTRIBUTION. — Antarctic, in sediments at 333-1153 m water depth.</p><p>OBSERVATIONS</p><p>Non-type specimen (LACM, only one available) colorless, complete, oval (Fig. 2A), slightly bent ventrally, pharynx partially exposed (Fig. 2C). Body 8 mm long, 3.5 mm wide, 26 chaetigers. Prostomium (Fig. 2B) distorted due to eversion of pharynx, bent posteriorly; lateral antennae eroded, inserted ahead of anterior eyes; median antenna thin, tapered, longer than caruncle. Palps conical, directed laterally. Eyes dark brown, anterior and posterior eyes fused laterally; anterior eyes reniform, twice as large as posterior round eyes. Caruncle distorted, with a median ridge and 3-4 lateral digitate lobes directed posteriorly. Branchiae with digitate filaments from chaetiger 1, with about 10 filaments along anterior chaetigers, becoming less abundant medially and posteriorly, continued to last chaetigers (Fig. 2D). Pharynx with a short smooth basal ring, and a longer distal ring; a middorsal ridge visible in the aperture. Posterior end tapered; pygidium with anus terminal, anal plate round, without cirri.</p><p>REMARKS</p><p>Hartman (1967, pl. 12, fig. A) only included a schematic illustration of the anterior end. Her figure shows the lateral antennae are ahead of the anterior eyes, the median antenna is inserted behind the posterior eyes, and palps are directed laterally and inserted ahead of lateral antennae. The caruncle includes a median, longer ridge with six lateral lobes, with the proximal ones apparently arising from the posterior prostomial margin.The eyes were depicted as circular, slightly separate from each other, and the anterior eyes slightly larger than posterior ones. Kudenov (1993) proposed a lectotype, noted several differences regarding the original illustration, and consequently illustrated several specimens of different size. Kudenov also illustrated the ontogenetic changes of P. antarctica n. comb. regarding its prostomium and caruncle. He showed that smaller specimens (8 mm long) have eyes distinct, anterior eyes 2-3 times larger than posterior ones, and closer to each other, and the caruncle is a small blunt ridge with two pairs of short (about as long as wide), digitate lateral branches. In medium-sized specimens, the eyes remain distinct and with similar size proportions, but the caruncle changes with the median ridge becoming tapered, and the lateral branches grow into digitate long lobes (2-3 times longer than wide), becoming a palmate structure. Larger specimens have eyes coalescent into 8-shaped spots, with anterior eyes oval to reniform, and the caruncle now includes some additional short, digitate lobes, crowded along the posterolateral prostomial margins, whereas the lateral branches are retained in size and position. Kudenov (1993) also gave a detailed account of the types of chaetae and branchial branching pattern, and this explains why these features are not included in our observations. The only confusion was regarding the affinities to other amphinomid genera, because Pherecardites was not taken into account, but Branchamphinome was only compared to Benthoscolex Horst, 1912 . Consequently, because most diagnostic features for Branchamphiome are also present in Pherecardites, and because the latter genus-group name has priority over Branchamphinome, we are regarding them as synonyms, retaining the older name, and have newly combined Hartman’s species in this genus.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D9BD7CFFBE772AFCCBA4A0FD76FC93	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Bleeker, Joke;Harris, Leslie;Ten Hove, Harry A.;Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I.	Bleeker, Joke, Harris, Leslie, Ten Hove, Harry A., Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I. (2023): Pherecardites Horst, 1912 and Branchamphinome Hartman, 1967 are synonyms (Annelida, Amphinomidae, Amphinominae). Zoosystema 45 (13): 435-443, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema2023v45a13
