identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03E6197C95028316FF21099AFE43E70A.text	03E6197C95028316FF21099AFE43E70A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Stichelia cuneifascia	<div><p>“ cuneifascia ” species group</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E6197C95028316FF21099AFE43E70A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Dias, Fernando Maia Silva;Dolibaina, Diego Rodrigo;Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik;Casagrande, Mirna Martins	Dias, Fernando Maia Silva, Dolibaina, Diego Rodrigo, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2013): Revision of the genus Stichelia Zikán (Riodinidae: Riodininae: Symmachiini), with the description of a new species from southern Brazil. Zootaxa 3693 (4): 579-593, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3693.4.10
03E6197C95028310FF210827FC51E395.text	03E6197C95028310FF210827FC51E395.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Stichelia catarinensis Dias, Dolibaina, Mielke & Casagrande	<div><p>Stichelia catarinensis Dias, Dolibaina, Mielke &amp; Casagrande, sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs. 1–2, 23, 29–30)</p><p>Stichelia ? sp. [sic]; D’Abrera 1994. p. 1049, [fig. 10].</p><p>Diagnosis. Forewing length: 10.5–12mm (n=7) (Figs 1–2, 23). Stichelia catarinensis can be distinguished from other species of the genus by the absence of orange scales in the prothorax and the strongly developed oblique orange band in the forewing; the band reaches the outer margin, and is wider and closer to the apex than any other species of Stichelia . Females of S. cuneifascia can be confused with males of S. catarinensis, but the former present a wedge-shaped orange band in the forewing, not reaching the outer margin. Morphologically, the closest ally of S. catarinensis is S. cuneifascia: besides sharing the absence of orange scales on the prothorax and the pattern of dark and light brown scales on both wings, the structure of the male genitalia (Figs 29–30) are similar between these two species. However, in S. catarinensis, the dorsal and ventral projections of the valva are more strongly developed, and the aedeagus is conical and shorter. Differently from other species of Stichelia, which are superficially alike some species of Panaropsis Hall, 2002, Phaenochitonia, Pterographium, Pirascca and Symmachia Hübner, [1819] with similar-looking black and orange pattern, no species from the above cited genera can be confused with S. catarinensis .</p><p>Description. Male. Head: mostly dark brown; antenna two thirds the length of the costal margin, segments proximally creamy white, club tip orange; labial palpus dark brown, short and thin, first and third segments short, about four times shorter than the second.</p><p>Thorax: (Figs 1–2) mostly dark brown; ventrally with some light brown scaling; legs dark brown with light brown scaling.</p><p>Forewing, shape: (Figs 1–2) elongated; costal margin almost straight, convex medially and curved towards the apex; apex angled; outer margin slightly convex, tornus angled; inner margin straight. Forewing length of the holotype: 12mm.</p><p>Forewing, upperside: (Fig. 1) ground color light brown with dark brown spots bordered distally by lighter brown scales; basal, discal, medial and postmedial bands irregular, spots indistinguishable, from the costal to the inner margin; marginal band with three rounded spots, one in CuA1–CuA2, and two in CuA2–2A; wide orange oblique preapical band; apex dark brown; fringe light brown (Fig. 23).</p><p>Forewing, underside: (Fig. 2) similar to the upperside but colors paler and whitish along the inner margin; nevertheless, the pattern of dark brown spots is conspicuously easier to distinguish and the marginal spots are entirely encircled by light brown scales.</p><p>Hindwing, shape: (Figs 1–2) quadrate; costal margin slightly convex; apex somewhat rounded; outer margin slightly convex; tornus angled; inner margin slightly convex.</p><p>Hindwing, upperside: (Fig. 1) ground color light brown, with dark brown spots bordered distally by lighter brown scales; basal, discal, medial and postmedial bands irregular, spots indistinguishable, from the costal to the inner margin; marginal band with one rounded spot along the outer margin in R4+5–M1, M1–M2, M2–M3, M3–CuA1, CuA1–CuA2, and two spots in CuA2–2A, fringe light brown (Fig. 23).</p><p>Hindwing, underside: (Fig. 2) similar to the upperside but paler and the pattern is easier to distinguish, marginal band with spots encircled by light brown scales.</p><p>Abdomen: (Figs 1–2) dorsally dark brown, with light brown scales along the margin of the segments; two patches of concealed androconial scales in the anterior portion of segments four and five; long lateral patch of brown scales in the last segment.</p><p>Male genitalia: (Figs 29–30) uncus squared, lobed ventrally, posterior edge slightly bilobated; tegumen squared, two times longer than the uncus; between the tegumen and the uncus there is a triangular membranous area; ventral projection of the tegumen thin, originating in the medial area of the anterior edge of the tegumen, sinuous and connected to the dorsal projection of the saccus; gnathos slightly connected to the tegumen and "C" shaped, ventral part pointed and longer than the dorsal part; saccus oblong, short and wide, projecting posteriorly a long and thin spine; dorsal projection of the pedicel originating in the posterior projection of the saccus, connected ventrally to the aedeagus near its anterior opening; valva bifid; dorsal part oblong, length two times greater than the width in lateral view, ventrally pointed; ventral part as a long and curved spine; aedeagus thick, short and conical, anteriorly wider; cornuti as a single row of spines, in the middle of the aedeagus when the vesica is retracted.</p><p>Female. Unknown.</p><p>Taxonomic comments. Specimens of S. catarinensis are usually misidentified as the female of S. cuneifascia in collections. D’Abrera (1994) illustrated a male specimen of this new species, supposedly from São Paulo, Brazil, indicating that the specimen was probably put aside in the Rogers Collection (BMNH) by Hans Ebert for future description. Although the female of S. catarinensis is unknown, based on the sexual dimorphism observed in other species of the genus, the appearance of the female of this species is probably similar to the male, with slightly lighter and broader diagonal orange bands in the forewing and the outer margin of the forewing more convex.</p><p>Distribution. This species is only known from the type location, Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil, in Atlantic forests at 0–200m of elevation and the municipality of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (Fig. 51) occurring in January, February, April, May, August and September.</p><p>Etymology. The name of the species is a reference to the state of Santa Catarina, location of the type and most of the known specimens.</p><p>Type material. Holotype: / Holotypus / Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brasil, 10–200m, 9–III –[19]74 Mielke &amp; Miers leg. / ♂/ Holótipo Stichelia catarinensis Dias, Dolibaina, Casagrande &amp; Mielke det. 2013/ DZ 24.035/ (deposited at DZUP).</p><p>Examined material (holotype and paratypes). BRAZIL, Santa Catarina, Joinville, 2 ♂, 17.IX.1967, Mielke leg., DZ 23.905*; 10.IV.1977, Mielke leg., DZ 23.735* (DZUP); 1♂, 9.III.1974, Mielke &amp; Miers leg., holotype, DZ 24.035* (DZUP); 2♂, 1.V.1991, Miers &amp; Mielke leg., OM 25.878, OM 25.854 (OM); 1♂, 14.IV.1981, H. Miers leg., OM 67.644* (OM); 1 ♂, no date, H. Miers leg., OM 67.184 (OM); 1♂, 17.IX.1967, 1♂, 22.V.1982, no collector (USNM); Joinville, Vila Nova, 1♂, III.1941, 1 ♂, VIII.1941, Pohl leg. (MZUSP); São Paulo, São Paulo, Brooklin Paulista, 1♂, 13.I.1965 Travassos leg. (MZUSP).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E6197C95028310FF210827FC51E395	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Dias, Fernando Maia Silva;Dolibaina, Diego Rodrigo;Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik;Casagrande, Mirna Martins	Dias, Fernando Maia Silva, Dolibaina, Diego Rodrigo, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2013): Revision of the genus Stichelia Zikán (Riodinidae: Riodininae: Symmachiini), with the description of a new species from southern Brazil. Zootaxa 3693 (4): 579-593, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3693.4.10
03E6197C95078313FF210D65FE74E201.text	03E6197C95078313FF210D65FE74E201.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Amarynthis bocchoris	<div><p>“ bocchoris ” species group</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E6197C95078313FF210D65FE74E201	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Dias, Fernando Maia Silva;Dolibaina, Diego Rodrigo;Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik;Casagrande, Mirna Martins	Dias, Fernando Maia Silva, Dolibaina, Diego Rodrigo, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2013): Revision of the genus Stichelia Zikán (Riodinidae: Riodininae: Symmachiini), with the description of a new species from southern Brazil. Zootaxa 3693 (4): 579-593, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3693.4.10
03E6197C95078313FF210BF1FB50E1B2.text	03E6197C95078313FF210BF1FB50E1B2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Stichelia cuneifascia (Zikán 1946) Zikan 1946	<div><p>Stichelia cuneifascia (Zikán, 1946)</p><p>(Figs 3–6, 24, 31–32, 39–41)</p><p>Phaenochitonia cuneifascia Zikán, 1946 . p. 348–349.</p><p>Stichelia cuneifascia; Zikán 1949. p. 539.—Mielke &amp; Casagrande 1987b. pp. 414–415, fig. 2.—Hall &amp; Willmott 1996. p. 649.—Hall &amp; Harvey 2002. p. 197—Callaghan &amp; Lamas 2004. p. 165.—Emery, Brown &amp; Pinheiro 2006. p. 89.</p><p>Diagnosis. Forewing length, male: 11mm; female: 11.5mm (n=2) (Figs 3–6, 24). The forewing outer margin of the male is distinctively less convex than S. catarinensis; orange band of the forewing strongly reduced on males, but present in both sexes, extending from the same area of the costal margin as S. catarinensis . However, the orange band is wedge-shaped and never reaches the outer margin, even on females. Additionally, the spots along the outer margin of the hind wing are straighter in S. cuneifascia than in S. catarinensis . The male genitalia (Figs 31–32) is similar to S. catarinensis, with the dorsal part of the valva less developed, and the aedeagus longer and cylindrical. The characters of the female genitalia cited for the " cuneifascia " species group are those observed in the female of S. cuneifascia (Figs 39–41), since the female of S. catarinensis remains unknown. However, the genitalia of the females of S. catarinenesis are expected to be similar to its closest ally, S. cuneifascia .</p><p>Taxonomic comments. Only few specimens of this species are known. The holotype is a female, illustrated by Warren et al. (2013), with the orange band of the forewing not reaching the outer margin. The orange band is reduced when compared to other species of the genus, but much larger when compared to male specimens. The type locality is part of a protected area in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ( Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia), where Zikán (1946) collected the specimen visiting flowers of the introduced ornamental shrub Euphorbia pulcherrima (Euphorbiaceae) in the southern slope of the Itatiaia mountain range. Although the surroundings of Itatiaia have been extensively sampled through the years, no additional specimens were ever caught. Interestingly, recent records of S. cuneifascia are specimens collected or observed in the Cerrado biome, from Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil (DZUP, Emery et al. 2006) and the state of São Paulo, Brazil (L. Kaminski, pers. comm.). No male specimens were available by Hall and Willmott (1996) and Hall and Harvey (2002) in their study about CAS and, as far as we know, this is the first time a male specimen of S. cuneifascia is illustrated, although Hall and Harvey (2002: 197) recognize that the male is known.</p><p>Distribution. Open environments, in habitats over 700m in Distrito Federal, Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo, Brazil, occurring in February, May, June and July.</p><p>Type material. The holotype of Phaenochitonia cuneifascia Zikán, 1946 has the following labels: / Holotypus / Phaenochitonia cuneifascia Zikán, 1946 Mielke &amp; Casagrande det 1986 Holótipo/ Itatiaya 700m Est[ado]. do Rio[de Janeiro], Brasil 12-VI-1941 E. B. Poins. Blat I. J. F. Zikán/ ♀/ Stichelia cuneifascia Zik. / Coleção J. F. Zikan/ (deposited at IOC) (Mielke &amp; Casagrande 1987a, b).</p><p>Examined material. BRAZIL: Distrito Federal, Brasília, Parque do Gama, 1000m, 1♂, 17.VI.1972, Mielke &amp; Brown leg., DZ 23.995* (DZUP); 1♀, 20.IV.1972, Mielke &amp; Brown leg., DZ 23.945* (DZUP); São Paulo, Itirapina, Parque Estadual de Vassununga, Pé de Gigante, 1♀, 24.V.2009, L. Kaminski, pers. comm.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E6197C95078313FF210BF1FB50E1B2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Dias, Fernando Maia Silva;Dolibaina, Diego Rodrigo;Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik;Casagrande, Mirna Martins	Dias, Fernando Maia Silva, Dolibaina, Diego Rodrigo, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2013): Revision of the genus Stichelia Zikán (Riodinidae: Riodininae: Symmachiini), with the description of a new species from southern Brazil. Zootaxa 3693 (4): 579-593, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3693.4.10
03E6197C9507831DFF210D21FCC1E4E4.text	03E6197C9507831DFF210D21FCC1E4E4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Stichelia dukinfieldia (Schaus 1902) Schaus 1902	<div><p>Stichelia dukinfieldia (Schaus, 1902)</p><p>(Figs. 7–10, 25, 33–34, 42–44)</p><p>Charis dukinfieldia Schaus, 1902 . p. 401.—Godman 1903. p. 539, fig. 3.—Mengel 1905. p. 65.</p><p>Phaenochitonia dukinfieldia; Stichel 1910. p. 15.—Stichel 1911. p.241. —Stichel 1930. p. 519.</p><p>Phaenochitonia dukinfildia [sic]; Seitz 1916. p. 677, pl. 134-i, misspelling.</p><p>Stichelia dukinfieldia; Zikán 1949. p. 539.—D’Abrera 1994. p. 1049.—Mielke 1995. p. 767.—Hall &amp; Willmott 1996. p. 649.— Hall &amp; Harvey 2002. p. 189.—Callaghan &amp; Lamas 2004. p. 165.—Dolibaina, Mielke &amp; Casagrande 2011. p. 348.— Casagrande, Dolibaina, Carneiro, Dias, Leite &amp; Mielke [2012]. pp. 300, 307, figs. 201–204.</p><p>Diagnosis. Forewing length, male: 10–11mm; female: 11–12mm (n=10) (Figs 7–10, 25). Easily distinguished from other species of the genus by the presence of two orange bands on the forewing: a proximal band, from costal margin to the end of discal cell; and a distal band, extending diagonally from the costal margin to the outer margin close to the tornus. Stichelia dukinfieldia presents an additional orange band on the hindwing. Male genitalia (Figs 33–34) with the ventral projection of the tegumen and the dorsal projection of the saccus slightly curved, uncus rectangular and angular in lateral view; projections of the gnathos closer to each other than other species of the “ bocchoris ” species group; pedicel thin in ventral view; aedeagus slender than other species of the genus; anterior projection of the saccus bilobed as in S. bocchoris; ventral lobe of the valve of about the same size as the dorsal lobe. Female genitalia (Figs 42–44) with lamella postvaginalis arched as in S. bocchoris; ductus bursae straight, but slightly curved before the corpus bursae; signa absent (n = 3).</p><p>Taxonomic comments. Schaus (1902) described this species based in an unknown number of specimens from Castro, Paraná, Brazil, although he provides a voucher number for the type, No. 5904 (USNM). However, there are four additional specimens, three males and one female, from the same locality and with the same voucher number, and a female specimen with the same voucher number, but from an unknown locality in the state of São Paulo, Brazil deposited at the USNM. To avoid future confusion and assure the stability of the type location (ICZN 1999), a male specimen from Castro, illustrated by Warren et. al. (2013) and deposited in the type collection of the USNM, is here designed lectotype, and the three remaining specimens from Castro are designed paralectotypes. The female specimen from São Paulo is not considered to be part of the type series: it is not cited by Schaus (1902) in the original description, even though it bears the same voucher number and probably was used to describe the species. Apparently this species closest ally is S. bocchoris, as S. dukinfieldia also have orange scales on the pleura of the last abdominal segments; male genitalia with the anterior projection of the saccus slightly bilobed, and female genitalia with lamella post-vaginal arched.</p><p>Distribution. Occurs exclusively in open environments in the states of Bahia to Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, at elevations above 800m (Fig. 51). As S. bocchoris, most individuals (circa 93%) were recorded between December and March (n = 80).</p><p>Type material. The lectotype of Charis dukinfieldia Schaus, 1902, here designated, has the following labels: / Castro, Parana[, Brazil]/ Collection W. Schaus/ Charis dukinfieldia type Schaus/ Type No. 5904 U.S. N.M./ LECTOTYPE Charis dukinfieldia Schaus, 1902, Dias, Dolibaina, Casagrande &amp; Mielke det. 2013/ LECTOTYPUS / (deposited at USNM). The characteristic lectotype label will be sent to the curator of the collection.</p><p>Examined material. BRAZIL, Bahia, Rio de Contas, Pico das Almas, 1400–1600m, 3♂, 1–3.II.2005, Mielke &amp; Casagrande leg., DZ 23.305, DZ 23.236, DZ 23.335 (DZUP); Minas Gerais, Delfim Moreira, 15km SE, 1500– 1700m, 1♂, 17–18.I.2004, Mielke &amp; Casagrande leg., DZ 23.395 (DZUP), 1♂ &amp; 2♀, 22–23.I.2004, Mielke &amp; Casagrande leg., DZ 23.915*, DZ 24.055*, DZ 23.075 (DZUP); São Paulo, no locality, no date, 1♀, Coll. Schaus (USNM); Campos do Jordão, 1♀, 15.XII.2007, Caldas leg. (USNM); 3♂, 8–12.II.1982, Mielke &amp; Casagrande leg., DZ 23.205, DZ 23.485, DZ 23.105 (DZUP); Campos do Jordão, Eug. Lefèvre, 1200m, 1♂, 28.II.1938, Travassos, Oiticica &amp; Travassos Filho leg., DZ 23.015 (DZUP); Campos do Jordão, Umuarama, 1700–1800m, 2♂, 31.I.1938, Travassos &amp; Oiticica leg., DZ 22.964, DZ 23.295 (DZUP); 3♂ &amp; 1♀, 3–15.II.1937, Gagarin leg., DZ 23.055, DZ 23.215, DZ 23.235, DZ 23.495 (DZUP); Campos do Jordão, Parque Estadual de Campos do Jordão, 1950m, 1♂, 10.II.1968, Mielke, Brown &amp; Laroca leg., DZ 23.265 (DZUP); Paraná, Jaguariaíva, Parque Estadual do Cerrado, 850m, 1♂ &amp; 1♀, 20-21.XI.2009, Mielke, Carneiro, Dias, Ribeiro &amp; Dolibaina leg., DZ 23.127, DZ 23.157 (DZUP); Ponta Grossa, Vila Velha, 900m, 2♂, 1.V.1966, Mielke &amp; Laroca leg., DZ 23.137, DZ 23.087 (DZUP); 1♂, 23.IV.2002, Mielke leg., DZ 22.937 (DZUP); Ponta Grossa, Vila Velha, 1♂, XII.1943, Justus leg., DZ 23.177 (DZUP); Ponta Grossa, Nova Rússia, 1♀, VIII.1950, Justus leg., DZ 23.117 (DZUP); Ponta Grossa, Campo, 1♀, IV.1957, Justus leg., DZ 23.025 (DZUP); São José dos Pinhais, Pilão de Pedra, 850m, 1♂, 1.II.2012, Mielke &amp; Dolibaina leg., DZ 23.355 (DZUP); 1♂, 18.II.1982, Mielke &amp; Casagrande leg., DZ 22.967 (DZUP); Castro, 1000m, 3♂ &amp; 1♀, no date, Coll. Schaus, lectotype &amp; paralectotypes (USNM); 1♂, 15.XI.1971, Mielke leg., DZ 23.187 (DZUP); 1♂, 20.XII.1977, Mielke leg., DZ 23.147 (DZUP); Colombo, 21♂ &amp; 6♀, 3.XII.1970, Mielke &amp; Lauterjung leg., DZ 23.275, DZ 23.405, DZ 23.125, DZ 23.115, DZ 22.954, DZ 23.085, DZ 23.186, DZ 23.155, DZ 23.446, DZ 23.076, DZ 23.195, DZ 22.945, DZ 23.536, DZ 23.197, DZ 22.995, DZ 23.325, DZ 23.165, DZ 23.145, DZ 23.414, DZ 23.016, DZ 23.526, DZ 23.255, DZ 23.054*, DZ 23.095, DZ 22.984, DZ 23.084*, DZ 23.385 (DZUP); 1♂, 16.I.1972, Lauterjung leg., DZ 23.185 (DZUP); Curitiba, 3♂ &amp; 1♀, 2.II.1971, Lauterjung leg., DZ 23.007, DZ 23.336, DZ 23.006, DZ 23.067 (DZUP); Guarapuava, 5♂ &amp; 4♀, 28.I.1972, Mielke &amp; Schneider leg., DZ 23.027, DZ 22.947, DZ 22.987, DZ 23.285, DZ 23.365, DZ 23.047, DZ 23.425, DZ 23.345, DZ 23.037 (DZUP); Tijucas do Sul, Rincão, 1♂ &amp; 1♀, 900m, 13.II.1969, Mielke &amp; Laroca leg., DZ 23.167, DZ 22.997 (DZUP); 1♂, 10.III.1971, Mielke leg., DZ 22.977 (DZUP); Santa Catarina, Dalbergia, 1♀, 1.X.1954, K. W. leg., DZ 23.057 (DZUP); Lages, Parque Pedras Brancas, 3♂ &amp; 2♀, 13.II.1973, Mielke &amp; Sakakibara leg., DZ 23.017, DZ 23.107, DZ 22.957, DZ 23.077, DZ 23.097 (DZUP).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E6197C9507831DFF210D21FCC1E4E4	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Dias, Fernando Maia Silva;Dolibaina, Diego Rodrigo;Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik;Casagrande, Mirna Martins	Dias, Fernando Maia Silva, Dolibaina, Diego Rodrigo, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2013): Revision of the genus Stichelia Zikán (Riodinidae: Riodininae: Symmachiini), with the description of a new species from southern Brazil. Zootaxa 3693 (4): 579-593, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3693.4.10
03E6197C9509831DFF210A58FB33E2DB.text	03E6197C9509831DFF210A58FB33E2DB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Stichelia pelotensis Biezanko, Mielke & Wedderhoff	<div><p>Stichelia pelotensis Biezanko, Mielke &amp; Wedderhoff, [1979]</p><p>(Figs 11–14, 26, 35–36, 45–47)</p><p>Stichelia pelotensis Biezanko, Mielke &amp; Wedderhoff, [1979]. p. 15, 17–18, figs. 8–10, pl. 4–7.—D’Abrera 1994. p. 1049.— Callaghan &amp; Lamas, 2004. p. 165.</p><p>Diagnosis. Forewing length, male: 9–10mm; female: 10mm (n=8). (Figs 11–14, 26) It is the only species of the “ bocchoris ” species group with a single orange band of the forewing extending from the costal margin at the end of the discal cell to the middle of the anal margin. The orange band in the hindwing is similar to S. dukinfieldia, however, this band is nearly straight in S. pelotensis, extending from the middle of the costal margin to the anal margin. Similarly to species of the “ cuneifascia ” species group, this is the only species of the “ bocchoris ” species group with the abdomen entirely black. Male genitalia (Figs 35–36) with ventral projection of the tegumen and dorsal projection of the saccus strongly sinuous; posterior projection of the saccus rounded; anterior projection of the saccus thin and long; uncus with rounded edges and a ventral lobe in lateral view; gnathos “C” shaped, dorsal and ventral parts farther apart than in S. dukinfieldia; ventral part of the valva shorter than the dorsal part, however larger dorso-ventrally than the dorsal part; aedeagus slightly longer and thicker than S. dukinfieldia . Female genitalia (Figs 45–47) with lamella antevaginal distinctly subtriangular, with rounded edges; ductus bursae twisted in the middle of its length, signa small and pointed.</p><p>Taxonomic comments. Stichelia pelotensis was the first taxon originally described in Stichelia (Biezanko et al. [1979]). However, it is difficult to relate this species with other species of the genus: the orange band on hind wing is similar to the band of S. dukinfieldia, but straighter and basal; the pleura of the abdomen is black, as in species of the " cuneifascia " species group; and the valva is similar to the valva of S. bocchoris, but the ventral part is much longer dorso-ventrally. The actual year of the publication of the paper by Biezanko, Mielke and Wedderhoff describing S. pelotensis is 1979 and not 1978.</p><p>Distribution. Restricted to the Pampas of the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul, at low elevations (Fig. 51). Even though Rio Grande do Sul is one of the best sampled Brazilian states (Carneiro et al. 2008), all except one of the nine known specimens are part of the type series, collected in the municipality of Pelotas and deposited at DZUP (Biezanko et al. [1979]). The only additional record for S. pelotensis is from Parque Estadual de Itapuã, municipality of Viamão, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil (L. Kaminski, pers. comm.). All specimens were recorded between late February and early April.</p><p>Type material. The holotype of Stichelia pelotensis Biezanko, Mielke &amp; Wedderhoff [1979], has the following labels: /Holótipo/ Pelotas, 17 Março 1957 R[io]. G[rande]. do Sul—Brasil C. Biezanko leg. / Stichelia pelotensis Biezanko, Mielke &amp; Wedderhoff, Holótipo, Biez., Mlke. &amp; Wedd. det. 1977/ DZ 1455/ (deposited at DZUP). The allotype has the following labels: /Alótipo/ Pelotas, 27 Fev [ereiro]. 1956 R[io]. G[rande]. do Sul—Brasil C. Biezanko leg. / Stichelia pelotensis Biezanko, Mielke &amp; Wedderhoff, Alótipo, Biez., Mlke. &amp; Wedd. det. 1977/ DZ 1456/ (deposited at DZUP).</p><p>Examined material. BRAZIL, Rio Grande do Sul, Pelotas, 1♀, 6.III.1956, Biezanko leg., DZ 1460* (DZUP); 1♀, 27.II.1956, Biezanko leg., DZ 1456 (DZUP); 2♀, 27.III.1956, Biezanko leg., DZ 1461*, DZ 1462 (DZUP); 2♂, 7.III.1957, Biezanko leg., DZ 1457, DZ 1459* (DZUP); 1♂ 17.III.1957, Biezanko leg., DZ 1455 (DZUP); 1♂, 8.IV.1958, Biezanko leg., DZ 1458 (DZUP), holotype, allotype and paratypes.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E6197C9509831DFF210A58FB33E2DB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Dias, Fernando Maia Silva;Dolibaina, Diego Rodrigo;Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik;Casagrande, Mirna Martins	Dias, Fernando Maia Silva, Dolibaina, Diego Rodrigo, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2013): Revision of the genus Stichelia Zikán (Riodinidae: Riodininae: Symmachiini), with the description of a new species from southern Brazil. Zootaxa 3693 (4): 579-593, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3693.4.10
03E6197C95098318FF210C6BFCA4E55C.text	03E6197C95098318FF210C6BFCA4E55C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Stichelia bocchoris (Hewitson 1876) Hewitson 1876	<div><p>Stichelia bocchoris (Hewitson, 1876)</p><p>(Figs 15–22, 27–28, 37–38, 48–50)</p><p>Amarynthis bocchoris Hewitson, 1876 . p. 81, [pl. 43] ( Erycinidae Limnas, &amp;c).</p><p>Phaenochitonia bocchoris; Stichel 1911. p. 242.—Stichel 1930. p. 519–520.</p><p>Phaenochitonia bocchoris bocchoris; Kirby 1877. p. 757.—Kirby 1879. p. 201.—Thieme 1907. p. 13.—Stichel 1930. p. 519– 520.—Brown &amp; Mielke 1967. p. 149.</p><p>Phaenochitonia bocchoris suavis Stichel, 1911 . p. 242, fig. 19a.—Stichel 1916. p. 15 (cited as Phaenochitonia bocchoris Stich. (Hew.)) .—Stichel 1923. p. 7.—Stichel 1930. p. 519–520; syn. nov.</p><p>Phaenochitonia ( bocchoris) suavis; Seitz 1916. p. 678, pl. 134–i.</p><p>Phaenochitonia bocchoris f. suavis; Zikán 1928. p. 19.</p><p>Stichelia bocchoris; Brown 1992. pp. 164–165, figs 58–59.—D’Abrera 1994. p. 1049, [figs 7–9].—Hall &amp; Willmott 1996. p. 649–650.—Hall &amp; Harvey 2002. p. 189, fig. 6G.—Iserhard, Quadros, Romanowski &amp; Mendonça 2010. p. 317.</p><p>Stichelia bocchoris bocchoris; Callaghan &amp; Lamas 2004. p. 165.—Emery, Brown &amp; Pinheiro 2006. p. 89.</p><p>Stichelia bocchoris suavis; Zikán 1949. p. 539.—Mielke 1995. p. 767.—Callaghan &amp; Lamas 2004. p. 165.—Iserhard &amp; Romanowski 2004. p. 658.—Dolibaina, Mielke &amp; Casagrande 2011. p. 348.—Francini, Duarte, Mielke, Caldas &amp; Freitas 2011. p. 64— Casagrande, Dolibaina, Carneiro, Dias, Leite &amp; Mielke [2012]. p. 300.</p><p>Diagnosis. Forewing length, male: 11–12mm; female: 11.5–13mm (n=10) (Figs 15–22, 27–28). It is the only species of the " bocchoris " species group in which the orange band of the hindwing is absent. However, three specimens have some orange scales scattered at the end of the discal cell on both wings. The forewing has a single orange band which extends diagonally from the costal margin from near the end of the discal cell to the posterior half of the outer margin, sometimes reaching the tornus. The thickness and length of this band are highly variable. The male genitalia (Figs 37–38) of S. bocchoris are larger than other species of Stichelia: tegumen squared, ventral projection of the tegumen and dorsal projection of the saccus straight, slightly folded dorsally; uncus retangular in lateral view and distally with a small median projection in ventral view; gnathos "C" shaped as in S. pelotensis; posterior projection of the saccus shorter than in other species of the “ bocchoris ” species group; aedeagus thicker and longer when compared to other species of Stichelia; anterior projection of the saccus slightly bilobed as in S. dukinfieldia; valva small, shorter than in other species but somewhat similar to the valva of S. pelotensis . Female genitalia (Figs 48–50) similarly large, with the lamella postvaginalis arched in ventral view; bursae copulatrix with ductus bursae twisted medially and folded before the corpus bursae; corpus bursae with a single pointed signus; papilla analis similar to other species of the “ bocchoris ” species group, but larger and proximally slightly curved.</p><p>Taxonomic comments. Amarynthis bocchoris Hewitson, 1876 shares similar wing pattern, morphology of the male and female genitalia; and is sympatric and continuously distributed with Phaenochitonia bocchoris suavis Stichel, 1911 syn. nov. The width of the orange band on the forewing, proposed by Stichel (1911, 1916) to differentiate these taxa, is highly variable and both narrow and wide orange bands can be found in a single locality. Nevertheless, there are differences on the color of the hind wing fringe linked with distribution, suggesting some degree of disconnection between the northern (Distrito Federal, Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro and northern São Paulo) (Figs 19–22) and southern populations (Paraná, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul) (Figs 15–18). In the northern population, the fringe is generally white only at the apex, the rest of the fringe consists of grayish brown scales (Fig. 28); while in the southern population the fringe is generally distinctly white from the apex to the tornus (Fig. 27). This distinction agrees with the current usage of the two names: while suavis is usually adopted to southern populations (e.g. Mielke 1994, Dolibaina et al. 2011), the nominotypical subspecies is usually adopted to northern populations (e.g. Emery et al. 2006). However, the type series of suavis include two males from Nova Friburgo, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, in which the fringes are white only at the apex, and a female from Rio Grande do Sul, in which the color of the fringe is inconspicuous or white only at the apex in both taxa, and therefore uninformative; additionally, there is a number of intermediate specimens along the range of both taxa. Hence, we propose to synonymize the name suavis with S. bocchoris and regard S. bocchoris as an intraspecific variable, widespread species.</p><p>Biology. The only host plant known for the genus is a record for S. bocchoris: an unidentified species of Miconia (Melastomataceae) in the state of Paraná, Brazil (J. M. S. Bizarro, pers. comm. apud Beccaloni et al. 2008).</p><p>Distribution. Unlike other species of the group, this taxon occurs in forest habitats of Brazil, in the Distrito Federal and the states of Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Paraná, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul, at elevations between 600–2000m (Fig. 50). Most specimens of this taxon (circa 92%) were registered between January and March (n=90), similar to the temporal distribution of other species of the genus.</p><p>Type material. This species was described based in an unknown number of specimens from the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The type specimen of Amarynthis bocchoris Hewitson, 1876 has the following labels: /Hewitson Coll. 79–69. Amarynthis bocchoris .3./ Type / (deposited at BMNH).</p><p>The type series of Phaenochitonia bocchoris suavis Stichel, 1911 comprises two males from Nova Friburgo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and one female from an unknown locality in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The lectotype, here designated to avoid future confusion between subspecific names (ICZN 1999), has the following labels: / Coll. Staudinger/ suavis Stich./ Brasilia Nov[a]. Frib[urgo, Rio de Janeiro]./ Amarynthis N[ew].S[pecies]. (Hew.)/ Type / LECTOTYPE Phaenochitonia bocchoris suavis Stichel, 1902 Dias, Dolibaina, Casagrande &amp; Mielke det. 2013/ LECTOTYPUS / (deposited at ZMHU). The characteristic lectotype label will be sent to the curator of the collection.</p><p>Examined material. BRAZIL, Distrito Federal, Brasília, Fazenda Água Limpa, 1♀, 2.II.1978, Gifford leg., DZ 22.966 (DZUP); Minas Gerais, Carmo do Rio Claro, 1♂, VIII.1948, Carvalho &amp; Castro leg., DZ 23.356 (DZUP); Catas Altas, Caraça, 1300m, 1♀, 16–18.IX.2006, Mielke &amp; Casagrande leg., DZ 22.956 (DZUP); Delfim Moreira, 15km SE, 1500–1700m, 2♂, 22–23.I.2004, Mielke &amp; Casagrande leg., DZ 22.996, DZ 22.986 (DZUP); Conceição do Mato Dentro, Serra do Cipó, 1000–1300m, 2♂, 30.I.1985, Mielke &amp; Casagrande leg., DZ 23.426, DZ 23.126 (DZUP); 1 ♂, 7.XI.1973, Moure &amp; Mielke leg., DZ 22.976 (DZUP); Virgínia, Fazenda dos Campos, 1500m, 1♂, no date, Zikán leg., DZ 23.116 (DZUP); 1♂, 13–15.II.2010, Mielke &amp; Casagrande leg., DZ 23.066 (DZUP), Rio de Janeiro, Itatiaia, 1500m, 1♀, 22.I.1936, Gagarin leg., DZ 23.406 (DZUP); Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia, 1300 –1700m, 1♂ &amp; 1♀, 12.I.1973, Mielke leg., DZ 22.934, DZ 23.316 (DZUP); 1♂ &amp; 1♀, 21.I.1969, Mielke &amp; Brown leg., DZ 23.176, DZ 23.276 (DZUP); São Paulo, Campos do Jordão, 3♂ &amp; 3♀, 8– 12.II.1982, Mielke &amp; Casagrande leg., DZ 22.936, DZ 23.056, DZ 23.196, DZ 22.946, DZ 23.535, DZ 23.286 (DZUP); 1♂, no location, no date, no collector (USNM); Campos do Jordão, Fazenda Guarda, 1♀, 15.II.1942, no collector, DZ 22.803 (DZUP); Campos do Jordão, Umuarama, 1800m, 1♂, 8–15.III.1937, Gagarin leg., DZ 23.036 (DZUP); 1♂ &amp; 2♀, 3–15.II.1937, Gagarin leg., DZ 23.695*, DZ 23.035, DZ 23.366 (DZUP); Campos do Jordão, Eng. Lefèvre, 1200m, 1♂, 1.II.1937, Travassos, Oiticica, Travassos Filho &amp; Lopes leg., DZ 22.793 (DZUP); Campos do Jordão, Parque Estadual de Campos do Jordão, 1950m, 1♀, 10.II.1968, Mielke, Brown &amp; Laroca leg., DZ 22.783 (DZUP); Campos do Jordão, Pico do Itapeva, 28.I.1967, Barroso &amp; Travassos leg. (MZUSP); Santos, Alto da Serra, 1♀, X.1923, Pohl leg. (MZUSP); São Paulo, Ipiranga, 1♂, III.1913, Pohl leg., 1♂ &amp; 1♀, V.1933, no collector (MZUSP); São Paulo, Ipiranga, 1♀, 17.IV. 19411, D’Almeida leg., DZ 23.089 (DZUP); 1♂, 10.IV.1942,, D’Almeida leg., DZ 23.206 (DZUP); São Paulo, Mata do Governo, 1♀, X.1914, Pohl leg. (MZUSP); Bananal, Serra da Bocaina, 4♂ &amp; 3♀, 8.I.1937, Travassos leg., DZ 23.476, DZ 23.435, DZ 23.376, DZ 23.266, DZ 23.496, DZ 23.506, DZ 23.456 (DZUP); Águas de Lindóia, Termas de Lindóia, 1♂, 11.II.1950, D'Almeida leg., DZ 23.466 (DZUP); Paraná, Campina Grande do Sul, Morro do Caratuva, 900-1700m, 1♀, 4.III.2009, Dolibaina leg. (DD); Carambeí, 1♂, 30.I.1971, Moure, Mielke &amp; Marinoni leg., DZ 23.026 (DZUP); Castro, 1000m, 1♂, 26.I.1972, Mielke &amp; Tangerini leg., DZ 23.005 (DZUP); Castro, 2♂ &amp; 2♀, no date, no collector (USNM); Chopinzinho, 1♀, 11.I.1970, Furtado leg., DZ 23.455 (DZUP); Colombo, 2♂ &amp; 3♀, 16.I.1972, Lauterjung leg., DZ 23.046, DZ 23.166, DZ 23.346, DZ 23.256, DZ 23.246, DZ 23.146 (DZUP); Curitiba, 3♂ &amp; 1♀, 26.I.1968, Mielke leg. (USNM); Curitiba, 900m, 1♂ &amp; 1♀, 11.II.1966, Mielke leg., DZ 23.505, DZ 23.004 (DZUP); 1♂, 28.I.1967, Mielke leg., DZ 23.306 (DZUP); 1♂ &amp; 1♀, 6.II.1968, Mielke leg., DZ 23.396, DZ 23.014 (DZUP); Curitiba, Cascatinha, 4♂ &amp; 2♀, 29.I.1967, Mielke leg., DZ 22.955, DZ 23.445, DZ 23.106, DZ 23.156, DZ 23.024, DZ 23.046 (DZUP); Guarapuava, 1♂ &amp; 2♀, 28.I.1972, Mielke &amp; Schneider leg., DZ 23.065, DZ 23.436, DZ 23.486 (DZUP); 2♂ &amp; 1♀, 13.I.1980, O.–C. Mielke leg., DZ 23.795*, DZ 23.296, DZ 23.226 (DZUP); Guarapuava, 9km N, 1200m, 1♂, 3.II.1976, Mielke &amp; Buzzi leg., DZ 23.326 (DZUP); Guarapuava, Parque Municipal das Araucárias, 1000m, 1♀, 14.II.2007, Dolibaina leg. (DD) Jaguariaíva, 850m, 1♂ &amp; 1♀, 19-20.IX.2009, Mielke, Carneiro, Dias, Leite &amp; Dolibaina leg., DZ 22.985, DZ 22.965 (DZUP); Lapa, 2♂, II.1940, (MZUSP); Ponta Grossa, Lageado, 1♂, XI.1939, Justus leg., DZ 23.045 (DZUP); 1♂, XII.1939, Justus leg., DZ 23.175 (DZUP); Prudentópolis, 1200m, 1♀, 2.II.1976, Mielke &amp; Buzzi leg., DZ 23.475 (DZUP); Rio Negro, 800m, 1♂, 25.II.1968, Moure &amp; Mielke leg., DZ 23.386 (DZUP); São José dos Pinhais, 850m, 1♂, 15.XII.1979, Mielke leg., DZ 22.944 (DZUP); Tijucas do Sul, Rincão, 900m, 1♂, 8.II.1968, Mielke, Brown &amp; Laroca leg., DZ 23.515 (DZUP); 1♂, 10.III.1971, Mielke leg., DZ 23.525 (DZUP); 1♀, 13.II.1979, Mielke &amp; Laroca leg., DZ 22.994 (DZUP); Tijucas do Sul, Vossoroca, 850m, 1♀, 8.II.1972, Mielke leg., DZ 22.975 (DZUP); Turvo, Britador, 900-1000m, 1♂ &amp; 1♀, 28-29.XII.2009, Dolibaina leg. (DD); 5♂ &amp; 1♀, 24-30.XII.2010, Dolibaina leg. (DD); 1♂ &amp; 3♀, 31.I.2011, Dolibaina leg. (DD); Turvo, Salto do Paulinho Rickli, 1000m, 1♀, 5.II.2011, Dolibaina leg. (DD); Turvo, Matão, 1000m, 3♂, 7.IV.2007, Dolibaina leg. (DD); Santa Catarina, Mafra, 1♀, 18.I.1985, Mielke leg., DZ 24.145* (DZUP); Rio dos Cedros, Pedra Preta, 800m, 1♀, 7.II.1972, Lauterjung leg., DZ 23.135 (DZUP); Rio dos Cedros, Alto Rio dos Cedros, 650m, 2♂ &amp; 2♀, 3-8.II.1972, Lauterjung leg., DZ 23.416, DZ 23.245, DZ 22.935, DZ 23.064* (DZUP); Rio Negrinho, 850m, 1♂, 18.I.1976, Mielke leg., DZ 23.216 (DZUP); 1♀, 24–27.I.1986, O.–C.</p><p>Mielke leg., DZ 22.974 (DZUP); Santa Cecília, Campo Alto, 1200m, 1♂ &amp; 1♀, 12.II.1973, Mielke &amp; Sakakibara leg., DZ 23.136, DZ 23.375 (DZUP); 1♀, 27.II.1968, Moure &amp; Mielke leg., DZ 23.315 (DZUP); São Joaquim, 1250m, 2♂, 24.II.1973, Mielke leg., DZ 23.465, DZ 23.516 (DZUP); Timbó, 1♀, II.1933, Pohl leg. (MZUSP); Rio Grande do Sul, Bom Jesus, 1050m, 1♀, 12.II.1976, Mielke &amp; Buzzi leg., DZ 23.096 (DZUP); Vacaria, Bela Vista, 950m, 1♂, 27.II.1973, Mielke leg., DZ 23.225 (DZUP).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E6197C95098318FF210C6BFCA4E55C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Dias, Fernando Maia Silva;Dolibaina, Diego Rodrigo;Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik;Casagrande, Mirna Martins	Dias, Fernando Maia Silva, Dolibaina, Diego Rodrigo, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2013): Revision of the genus Stichelia Zikán (Riodinidae: Riodininae: Symmachiini), with the description of a new species from southern Brazil. Zootaxa 3693 (4): 579-593, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3693.4.10
03E6197C950D8319FF210BFEFA36E5C2.text	03E6197C950D8319FF210BFEFA36E5C2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Stichelia	<div><p>Key to species of Stichelia</p><p>1. Without orange scales on the prothorax (“ cuneifascia ” species group)............................................ 2</p><p>- With orange scales on the prothorax (“ bocchoris ” species group)................................................ 3</p><p>2. Forewing submarginal band strongly developed, reaching the outer margin...................... S. catarinensis sp. nov.</p><p>- Forewing diagonal submarginal band wedge-shaped, weakly developed, and does not reach the outer margin... S. cuneifascia</p><p>3. Hindwing with a postdiscal band from the costal margin to the inner margin....................................... 4</p><p>- Hindwing without orange bands............................................................. S. bocchoris .... 5</p><p>4. Forewing with two bands: a postdiscal band from the costal margin to the outer margin near the tornus, and an additional discal band from the costal margin to the Cubitus....................................................... S. dukinfieldia</p><p>- Forewing with one band only, from the costal margin to the inner margin................................. S. pelotensis</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E6197C950D8319FF210BFEFA36E5C2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Dias, Fernando Maia Silva;Dolibaina, Diego Rodrigo;Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik;Casagrande, Mirna Martins	Dias, Fernando Maia Silva, Dolibaina, Diego Rodrigo, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2013): Revision of the genus Stichelia Zikán (Riodinidae: Riodininae: Symmachiini), with the description of a new species from southern Brazil. Zootaxa 3693 (4): 579-593, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3693.4.10
