taxonID	type	description	language	source
03E387E8FFBEC17A03C7A0E03BC9CADB.taxon	type_taxon	Type species. Cleta brevirostris Claus 1863 (= Paralaophonte (Paralaophonte) brevirostris (Claus 1863), by subsequent designation). Other species. See other species in the subgenera below. Updated diagnosis. Laophontidae. Body fusiform. Cephalothorax with small semicircular extension in posterolateral corner, and with crescentic mid-ventrolateral extension. Female antennule six- or seven-segmented; male antennule subchirocer or chirocer; second antennulary segment with or without outgrowth, the latter either a spinous process or a small blunt conical protuberance when present. Antenna with allobasis; exopod one-segmented with four setae. Mandibular palp one-segmented (basis, exopod and endopod fused) or uniramous (basis and endopod distinct; exopod fused to basis). Maxilla with three syncoxal endites. Maxilliped subchelate; syncoxa with one to three setae, never unarmed; relative position of the maxilliped ventral or lateral (the latter only in Pa. (Pa.) harpagone). P 1 EXP two- or three-segmented; P 1 ENP two-segmented, first segment elongate, without armature, longer than second segment, the latter with strong claw and small slender seta; P 2 – P 4 EXP three-segmented; P 2 and P 3 ENP two-segmented, P 4 ENP one-segmented (Pa. (Loureirophonte )) or two-segmented (Pa. (Paralaophonte )); P 5 EXP and baseoendopod separated, P 5 EXP truncated (in most species of Pa. (Paralaophonte )) or oblique (in some species of Pa. (Paralaophonte), and in all species of Pa. (Loureirophonte )), outer basal seta arising from well-developed setophore. Armature formula of P 1 – P 5 as follows: Genital and third urosomites fused in female forming genital double-somite. Caudal rami cylindrical or lamelliform (the latter in Pa. (Pa.) aenigmaticum and Pa. (Pa.) asellopsiformis): with seven setae; caudal setae IV and V whip-like or spiniform (the latter in Pa. (Pa.) aenigmaticum). Sexual dimorphism expressed in the antennule, P 2 ENP 2 (subdistal inner seta of ENP 2 thickened, with lamellar outgrowths in distal third), P 3 EXP (segments and armature stronger than in the female), P 5, and P 6; the P 3 ENP is three-segmented with apophysis on ENP 2 in most species of Pa. (Paralaophonte), but this ramus is not sexually dimorphic in some species of Pa. (Paralaophonte) and in all species of Pa. (Loureirophonte )).	en	Gómez, Samuel, Nazari, Fatemeh (2021): A new species of Paralaophonte Lang 1948 (Harpacticoida: Laophontidae), with notes on the phylogeny of the genus and its relationships with Loureirophonte Jakobi 1953 using Bayesian inference. Zootaxa 5032 (2): 195-215, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5032.2.2
03E387E8FFB9C17D03C7A1C03B92C894.taxon	description	urn: lsid: zoobank. org: act: 3 C 76380 F- 5 EE 8 - 4 B 3 B-B 6 CC-C 9557974 B 0 DF	en	Gómez, Samuel, Nazari, Fatemeh (2021): A new species of Paralaophonte Lang 1948 (Harpacticoida: Laophontidae), with notes on the phylogeny of the genus and its relationships with Loureirophonte Jakobi 1953 using Bayesian inference. Zootaxa 5032 (2): 195-215, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5032.2.2
03E387E8FFB9C17D03C7A1C03B92C894.taxon	type_taxon	Type species. Loureirophonte catharinensis Jakobi 1953 (= Paralaophonte (Loureirophonte) catharinensis Jakobi 1953 comb. nov.), by original designation. Other species. Loureirophonte cesareae (Por 1964) (= Paralaophonte (Loureirophonte) cesareae (Por 1964) comb. nov.); Lo. furcata Fiers 1993 (= Pa. (Lo.) furcata Fiers 1993 comb. nov.); Lo. isabelensis Mielke 1981 (= Pa. (Lo.) isabelensis Mielke 1981 comb. nov.); Lo. laingensis Fiers 1993 (= Pa. (Lo.) laingensis Fiers 1993 comb. nov.); Lo. majacola Fiers 1993 (= Pa. (Lo.) majacola Fiers 1993 comb. nov.); Lo. majahualensis Fiers 1993 (= Pa. (Lo.) majahualensis Fiers 1993 comb. nov.); Lo. mediterranea Fiers 1993 (= Pa. (Lo.) mediterranea Fiers 1993 comb. nov.); Lo. minutum Gómez & Boyko, 2006 (= Pa. (Lo.) minutum Gómez & Boyko, 2006 comb. nov.); Lo. paranaensis Jakobi 1953 (= Pa. (Lo.) paranaensis Jakobi 1953 comb. nov.); Lo. psammophila Mielke, 2001 (= Pa. (Lo.) psammophila Mielke, 2001 comb. nov.); Lo. subterranea (Lang 1965) (= Pa. (Lo.) subterranea (Lang 1965) comb. nov.).	en	Gómez, Samuel, Nazari, Fatemeh (2021): A new species of Paralaophonte Lang 1948 (Harpacticoida: Laophontidae), with notes on the phylogeny of the genus and its relationships with Loureirophonte Jakobi 1953 using Bayesian inference. Zootaxa 5032 (2): 195-215, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5032.2.2
03E387E8FFB9C17D03C7A1C03B92C894.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Laophontidae: Paralaophonte. Female antennule six-segmented; male antennule subchirocer; second antennulary segment with spinous process or a small blunt conical protuberance. Mandibular palp one-segment- ed (basis, exopod and endopod fused). Maxilliped subchelate; relative position of the maxilliped ventral. P 1 EXP two-segmented; P 1 ENP two-segmented, first segment elongate, longer than second segment, the latter with strong claw and small slender seta; P 2 – P 4 EXP three-segmented; P 2 – P 3 ENP two-segmented; P 4 ENP one-segmented. P 5 EXP and baseoendopod separated in both sexes, outer basal seta arising from well-developed setophore; female P 5 EXP oblique. Armature formula of P 1 – P 5 as follows: Genital and third urosomites fused in female forming genital double-somite. Caudal rami cylindrical, with seven setae, caudal setae IV and V whip-like. Sexual dimorphism expressed in antennule, P 2 ENP 2 (subdistal inner seta of ENP 2 thickened, with lamellar outgrowths in distal third), P 3 EXP (expressed in stronger segments and outer spines), P 5, and P 6.	en	Gómez, Samuel, Nazari, Fatemeh (2021): A new species of Paralaophonte Lang 1948 (Harpacticoida: Laophontidae), with notes on the phylogeny of the genus and its relationships with Loureirophonte Jakobi 1953 using Bayesian inference. Zootaxa 5032 (2): 195-215, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5032.2.2
03E387E8FFB9C17C03C7A7593E54CBBC.taxon	description	urn: lsid: zoobank. org: act: 4 A 8 D 3 DE 8 - B 9 A 8 - 4 D 36 - A 333 - 10 AA 6 C 38622 F	en	Gómez, Samuel, Nazari, Fatemeh (2021): A new species of Paralaophonte Lang 1948 (Harpacticoida: Laophontidae), with notes on the phylogeny of the genus and its relationships with Loureirophonte Jakobi 1953 using Bayesian inference. Zootaxa 5032 (2): 195-215, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5032.2.2
03E387E8FFB9C17C03C7A7593E54CBBC.taxon	type_taxon	Type species. Cleta brevirostris Claus 1863 (= Paralaophonte (Paralaophonte) brevirostris (Claus 1863), by subsequent designation). Other species. Paralaophonte (Paralaophonte) aenigmaticum Wells, Hicks & Coull 1982; Pa. (Pa.) asellopsiformis Lang 1965; Laophonte congenera Sars 1908 (= Pa. (Pa.) congenera congenera (Sars 1908 )); La. congenera mediterranea Lang 1948 (= Pa. (Pa.) congenera mediterranea (Lang 1948 )); La. dieuzeidei Monard 1936 (= Pa. (Pa.) dieuzeidei (Monard 1936 )); Pa. (Pa.) echinata Fiers 1986; Pa. (Pa.) galapagoensis Mielke 1981; La. gracilipes Brady 1910 (= Pa. (Pa.) gracilipes (Brady 1910 )); La. gurneyi Lang 1934 (= Pa. (Pa.) gurneyi (Lang 1934 )); Pa. (Pa.) harpagone Gheerardyn, Fiers, Vincx & De Troch, 2006; La. hyperborea Sars 1909 (= Pa. (Pa.) hyperborea (Sars 1909 )); Pa. (Pa.) innae Chislenko 1977; La. karmensis Sars 1911 (= Pa. (Pa.) karmensis (Sars 1911 )); Pseudonychocamptus kolarovi Apostolov, 2008 (= Pa. (Pa.) kolarovi (Apostolov, 2008 )); Pa. (Pa.) lacerdai, Jakobi 1953; La. lamellipes Nicholls 1944 (= Pa. (Pa.) lamellipes (Nicholls 1944 )); Pa. (Pa.) livingstoni Apostolov, 2004; La. longipes Scott T. 1894 (= Pa. (Pa.) longipes (Scott T. 1894 )); La. lunata Willey 1932 (= Pa. (Pa.) lunata (Willey 1932 )); La. macera Sars 1908 (= Pa. (Pa.) macera (Sars 1908 )); Pa. (Pa.) majae Petkovski 1964; La. meinerti Brady 1899 (= Pa. (Pa.) meinerti (Brady 1899 )); Pa. (Pa.) obscura Vervoort 1962; La. octavia Monard 1935 (= Pa. (Pa.) octavia (Monard 1935 )); Pa. (Pa.) ormieresi Raibaut 1968; Pa. (Pa.) pacifica Lang 1965; Pa. (Pa.) pacificaemulator Gómez & Morales-Serna, 2013; Pa. (Pa.) pacificavicinum Gómez & Morales-Serna, 2013; Pa. (Pa.) pallaresae Huys & Lee, 2009; Pa. (Pa.) panamensis Mielke 1982; La. perplexa Scott T. 1899 (= Pa. (Pa.) perplexa (Scott T. 1899 )); Pa. (Pa.) pilosoma Vervoort 1964; Pa. (Pa.) problematica Mielke 1981; La. quaterspinata Brian 1917 (= Pa. (Pa.) quaterspinata (Brian 1917 )); La. royi Jakubisiak 1932 (= Pa. (Pa.) royi (Jakubisiak 1932 )); Pa. (Pa.) sculpta Hamond 1973; Pa. (Pa.) septemarticulata Chislenko 1978; Pa. (Pa.) spitzbergensis Mielke 1974; La. taurina Monard 1928 (= Pa. (Pa.) taurina (Monard 1928 )); La. tenera Sars 1920 (= Pa. (Pa.) tenera (Sars 1920 )); Pa. (Pa.) ullama sp. nov.; La. zimmeri Douwe 1929 (= Pa. (Pa.) zimmeri (Douwe 1929 )).	en	Gómez, Samuel, Nazari, Fatemeh (2021): A new species of Paralaophonte Lang 1948 (Harpacticoida: Laophontidae), with notes on the phylogeny of the genus and its relationships with Loureirophonte Jakobi 1953 using Bayesian inference. Zootaxa 5032 (2): 195-215, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5032.2.2
03E387E8FFB9C17C03C7A7593E54CBBC.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Laophontidae: Paralaophonte. Female antennule six- or seven-segmented; male antennule subchirocer or chirocer; second antennulary segment with or without outgrowth, the latter a spinous process or a small blunt conical protuberance when present. Mandibular palp one-segmented (basis, exopod and endopod fused) or uniramous (basis and endopod distinct; exopod fused to basis). Maxilliped subchelate; syncoxa with one to three setae, never unarmed; relative position of the maxilliped ventral or lateral (the latter only in Pa. (Pa.) harpagone). P 1 EXP two- or three-segmented; P 1 ENP two-segmented, first segment elongate, longer than second segment, the latter with strong claw and small slender seta; P 2 – P 4 EXP three-segmented; P 2 – P 4 ENP two-segmented. P 5 EXP and baseoendopod separated in both sexes, outer basal seta arising from well-developed setophore; female P 5 EXP truncated or oblique. Armature formula of P 1 – P 5 as follows: Genital and third urosomites fused in female forming genital double-somite. Caudal rami cylindrical or lamelliform (the latter in Pa. (Pa.) aenigmaticum and Pa. (Pa.) asellopsiformis); with seven setae; caudal setae IV and V whip-like or spiniform (the latter in Pa. (Pa.) aenigmaticum). Sexual dimorphism expressed in antennule, P 2 ENP 2 (subdistal inner seta of ENP 2 thickened, with lamellar outgrowths in distal third), P 3 EXP (segments and armature stronger than in the female), P 5, and P 6; P 3 ENP with sexual dimorphism in most species (three-segmented, with apophysis on ENP 2), but without sexual dimorphism in some others.	en	Gómez, Samuel, Nazari, Fatemeh (2021): A new species of Paralaophonte Lang 1948 (Harpacticoida: Laophontidae), with notes on the phylogeny of the genus and its relationships with Loureirophonte Jakobi 1953 using Bayesian inference. Zootaxa 5032 (2): 195-215, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5032.2.2
03E387E8FFB8C17403C7A78D3A5FCE9B.taxon	description	(Figs. 1 – 6) urn: lsid: zoobank. org: act: 4 B 77 A 5 F 7 - BAE 9 - 4 CB 1 - 8333 - 87 E 9 A 4 B 7 C 818	en	Gómez, Samuel, Nazari, Fatemeh (2021): A new species of Paralaophonte Lang 1948 (Harpacticoida: Laophontidae), with notes on the phylogeny of the genus and its relationships with Loureirophonte Jakobi 1953 using Bayesian inference. Zootaxa 5032 (2): 195-215, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5032.2.2
03E387E8FFB8C17403C7A78D3A5FCE9B.taxon	materials_examined	Type material. ♀ holotype dissected and mounted onto seven slides (ICML-EMUCOP- 180119 - 124). Type locality. Mexico, Sinaloa State, Mazatlán, Urías coastal system, stn 1 (see also Gómez (2020 a: 43, figure 1 )); 23.15194 ° N, 106.3128 ° W; 1.5 m depth; organic carbon content 3.74 %; organic matter content 6.43 %; sand 25.31 %; clay 35.75 %; silt 38.94 %; 18 Jan. 2019; S. Gómez leg.	en	Gómez, Samuel, Nazari, Fatemeh (2021): A new species of Paralaophonte Lang 1948 (Harpacticoida: Laophontidae), with notes on the phylogeny of the genus and its relationships with Loureirophonte Jakobi 1953 using Bayesian inference. Zootaxa 5032 (2): 195-215, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5032.2.2
03E387E8FFB8C17403C7A78D3A5FCE9B.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The specific epithet comes from the ancient Náhuatl name “ ullama ”, one of the few descendants of the pre-Columbian ballgame, ōllamaliztli (from the Aztec ancient Náhuatl ullama, ballgame, and ulli, rubber), played by the Aztecs and other Mesoamerican people. Ulama, considered one of the oldest team games, is at the verge of extinction and its three variants (stick ulama, forearm ulama, and hip ulama) are played only in few towns of Sinaloa state, north-western Mexico.	en	Gómez, Samuel, Nazari, Fatemeh (2021): A new species of Paralaophonte Lang 1948 (Harpacticoida: Laophontidae), with notes on the phylogeny of the genus and its relationships with Loureirophonte Jakobi 1953 using Bayesian inference. Zootaxa 5032 (2): 195-215, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5032.2.2
03E387E8FFB8C17403C7A78D3A5FCE9B.taxon	diagnosis	Differential diagnosis (based on the only female inspected). Laophontidae: Paralaophonte. Antennule sixsegmented; second segment with outer spiniform projection of moderate size. Mandibular palp with five setae (one basal, one exopodal, three endopodal). Maxilliped subchelate; syncoxa with two setae; endopodal claw slender, nearly as long as basis. P 1 EXP three-segmented; P 1 EXP 3 with four elements. Armature formula of P 2 – P 4 EXP / ENP: P 2 0,1,123 / 0,220; P 3 0,1,223 / 0,321; P 4 0,1,223 / 0,121. P 5 EXP truncated, with six setae; P 5 BENP with four setae. Caudal rami 1.5 x as long as wide, with seven setae of which setae IV and V well-developed.	en	Gómez, Samuel, Nazari, Fatemeh (2021): A new species of Paralaophonte Lang 1948 (Harpacticoida: Laophontidae), with notes on the phylogeny of the genus and its relationships with Loureirophonte Jakobi 1953 using Bayesian inference. Zootaxa 5032 (2): 195-215, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5032.2.2
03E387E8FFB8C17403C7A78D3A5FCE9B.taxon	description	Description of the female. Total body length 435 µm measured from anterior tip of rostrum to posterior margin of caudal rami. Habitus (Fig. 1 A, C) semi-cylindrical, without clear demarcation between prosome and urosome; covered with minute spinules dorsally and laterally. Rostrum (Fig. 1 A, C) small, fused to cephalothorax, bifid apically, with two sensilla. Prosome (Fig. 1 A, C) consisting of cephalothorax and three free pedigerous somites. Cephalothorax (Fig. 1 A, C) reticulated, with sensilla and symmetrical depressions as shown; posterior margin with slender spinules, and with posterolateral extension. Posterodorsal and posterolateral margins of P 2 – P 4 - bearing somites with sensilla as depicted, with transverse row of small spinules and with longer elements as shown (Fig. 1 A, C); P 2 - bearing somite without, P 3 - and P 4 - bearing somites with posterior medial pore dorsally (Fig. 1 A). Urosome (Figs. 1 A, C, 2 A, B) five-segmented. P 5 - bearing somite (Figs. 1 A, C, 2 A) ornamented with dorsal and lateral spinules as in previous somite, with posterolateral bulbous extension bearing a sensillum and furnished with spinules as depicted (Figs. 1 C, 2 A). Genital double-somite completely fused ventrally (Fig. 2 B); original segmentation marked by dorsolateral spinular row indicating original posterior margin of proximal half of genital doublesomite (Figs 1 A, C, 2 A); both halves with dorsal and lateral spinules as in previous somite, with dorsomedial pore posteriorly, and with posterolateral bulbous extension (of anterior half without, of posterior half with sensillum) (Figs. 1 A, C, 2 A); ventral surface of both halves smooth, proximal half without, distal half with posterior slender spinules (Fig. 2 B); P 6 on proximal half of genital somite (anterior half of genital double-somite) (Fig. 2 B). First free abdominal somite with dorsal and lateral spinules and mediodorsal pore as in distal half of genital double-somite, with fewer sensilla (Figs. 1 A, C, 2 A); ventral surface (Fig. 2 B) covered with spinules as shown and with transverse row of posterior spinules. Second free abdominal somite as in previous somite, but without sensilla or posterolateral bulbous extension (Figs. 1 C, 2 A); ventrally largely as in previous somite (Fig. 2 B). Anal somite (Figs. 1 A – D, 2 A, B) with minute spinules scattered dorsally and laterally; with larger dorsolateral spinules close to insertion with caudal rami; anal operculum semi-circular, with small spinules along posterior margin and flanked by a sensillum and a longitudinal spinular row on each side; ventrally cleft medially, with two medial pores on each side and with posterior spinules close to insertion of caudal rami. Caudal rami (Figs. 1 A – D; 2 A, B, D) cylindrical, slightly longer than wide, with straight outer and convex inner margin; dorsal and ventral surface covered with small spinules; medially with oblique spinular row; with transverse spinular row at the base of setae I, II and III, with additional dorsolateral spinular row close to insertion of seta IV and ventrally at the base of seta VI; with seven setae as follows (Figs. 1 B, D, 2 D): setae I, II and III issuing laterally on distal fifth, seta I shortest, setae II and III subequal in length; distal setae IV and V with fracture plane, the former about one third the length of the latter and with distal half with outer spinules, seta V with distal half bipinnate; seta VI arising at inner distal corner; seta VII issuing dorsally near middle of each ramus, triarticulated. Antennule (Fig. 3 A) six-segmented; segments with spinules as shown; second segment largest, with outer spinous process. All setae smooth; armature formula: 1 [1], 2 [8], 3 [7], 4 [1 + (1 + ae)], 5 [1], 6 [9 + acrothek]; acrothek of last segment consisting of two slender setae fused basally to slender aesthetasc. Antenna (Fig. 3 B) composed of coxa, allobasis, and free endopodal segment. Coxa small, ornamented with two rows of spinules. Allobasis with outer incision close to exopod marking original segmentation of basis and first endopodal segment; ornamented with few inner long spinules proximally; with median pinnate abexopodal seta. Exopod one-segmented; ornamented with outer spinules; with one lateral and three apical pinnate setae. Free endopodal segment as long as allobasis; with large spinules along inner margin, and outer subapical frill; laterally with one unipinnate and one smooth spine, and one slender seta; apical armature consisting of two smooth inner distal spines, two apical geniculate elements, and one geniculate outer distal seta fused basally to slender outer element. Mandible (Fig. 4 A) with well-developed coxa ornamented with short spinular row; gnathobase well-developed, with two blunt and three multicuspidate teeth, and one long pinnate seta. Mandibular palp one-segmented; exopod and endopod fused to basis; with five setae in all (one basal, three endopodal, one exopodal). Maxillule (Fig. 4 B) with praecoxal arthrite with few long spinules; with one lateral spine, and seven distal elements one of which a slender spine. Coxa small, with few outer spinules; coxal endite cylindrical, with few subdistal spinules and two setae one of which pinnate. Basis elongate, endite cylindrical and bearing one pinnate and two naked setae. Endopod fused to basis, with three subequal smooth setae. Exopod one-segmented, elongate, with two apical naked setae. Maxilla (Fig. 4 C) with syncoxa ornamented with small proximal inner spinules and longer outer subdistal ones; with three endites; proximal endite with few subdistal spinules and one seta, medial endite with one thick seta fused to endite and two slender elements, distal endite with three setae as shown. Allobasis drawn out into unipinnate claw, with slender spine, and one posterior and one anterior accompanying seta. Endopod small, one-segmented, with two bare setae. Maxilliped (4 D) with syncoxa ornamented with rows of spinules as shown, and with two pinnate setae. Basis unarmed, with few outer spinules medially. Endopod drawn out into long claw with slender accessory seta. P 1 (Fig. 5 A) with elongate coxa ornamented with inner and outer spinules as depicted. Basis about 1.5 x as long as broad, with spinular rows as shown; with bipinnate outer spine and inner pinnate spine, the latter situated medially at the base of inner pedestal. Exopod three-segmented; segments with outer spinules as shown; EXP 1 with long outer spine ornamented with long spinules, EXP 2 with smooth outer spine, EXP 3 with two smooth outer spines and two distal geniculate setae. Endopod two-segmented, elongate; ENP 1 2 x as long as EXP, with slender inner spinules and comparatively stronger outer spinules; ENP 2 with few inner distal spinules and armed with one strong claw and one small bare seta. P 2 – P 4 (Figs. 5 B, 6 A, B). Praecoxa triangular; with distal row of spinules. Coxa rectangular; with spinular rows as shown. Basis with outer spinules at base of outer element, the latter a pinnate spine in P 2, but a bare slender seta in P 3 and P 4. Exopod three-segmented; EXP 1 and EXP 3 longest, EXP 2 shortest; exopodal segments with outer spinules and surface pores as shown; EXP 1 without, EXP 2 with inner seta; P 2 EXP 3 with six (one inner seta, two apical elements, and three outer spines), P 3 EXP 3 with seven (two inner setae, two apical elements, and three outer spines of which distal most with coarser spinular ornamentation), P 4 EXP 3 with seven elements (two inner setae, two apical elements, and three outer spines with spinular ornamentation coarser than in P 2 and P 3). Endopods twosegmented, of P 2 reaching slightly beyond EXP 2, of P 3 and P 4 reaching slightly above and slightly below middle of EXP 2, respectively; endopodal segments of P 2 subequal in length, P 3 – P 4 ENP 1 shorter than second segment; segments ornamented with outer and inner spinules as shown; ENP 1 without armature, P 2 ENP 2 with four (two inner, two apical), P 3 ENP 2 with six (three inner, two apical, one inner), P 4 ENP 2 with four elements (one outer, two apical, one outer). P 1 - P 4 setal formulae as follows: P 5 (Fig. 2 A, C) with baseoendopod and exopod separated and ornamented with spinules as figured. Baseoendopod wide; with long slender spinules along inner margin; basal seta issuing from long setophore; endopodal lobe with three inner elements (two innermost elements spiniform and unipinnate, subdistal inner element a whip-like seta) and one distal seta. Exopod truncated, with six elements of which innermost bare. Genital field and P 6 (Fig. 2 B) smooth, located in proximal half of genital double-somite, with median copulatory pore. P 6 symmetrical, with one bare seta. Description of the male. Unknown. Variability. The only female analyzed possesses two instead of one inner seta on the right P 4 ENP 2.	en	Gómez, Samuel, Nazari, Fatemeh (2021): A new species of Paralaophonte Lang 1948 (Harpacticoida: Laophontidae), with notes on the phylogeny of the genus and its relationships with Loureirophonte Jakobi 1953 using Bayesian inference. Zootaxa 5032 (2): 195-215, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5032.2.2
