taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03EE87BAFFEA5B07FCE6F992FDCCFA48.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476689/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476689	Figure 4: Right front paw (ventral view) in (1) SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (ZFMK 92.478) and (2) AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (NMW 28084). Roman numerals correspond to digits (No. I is the thumb); a.v. – antebrachial vibrissae. Note that digit III is longer than either digits II and IV. Also note differences in length of claws (decidedly longer in SPermoPhiloPSiS) and in hairiness of the palm (nude in AtlantoxerUS). Not to scale.	Figure 4: Right front paw (ventral view) in (1) SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (ZFMK 92.478) and (2) AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (NMW 28084). Roman numerals correspond to digits (No. I is the thumb); a.v. – antebrachial vibrissae. Note that digit III is longer than either digits II and IV. Also note differences in length of claws (decidedly longer in SPermoPhiloPSiS) and in hairiness of the palm (nude in AtlantoxerUS). Not to scale.	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEA5B07FCE6F992FDCCFA48.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476691/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476691	Figure 5: Nipples in (1) SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (ZFMK 92.496) and (2) EUxerUS erythroPUS (ZFMK 76.38): p – pectoral; a1 and a2 – 1st and 2nd abdominal; i – inguinal. Not to scale.	Figure 5: Nipples in (1) SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (ZFMK 92.496) and (2) EUxerUS erythroPUS (ZFMK 76.38): p – pectoral; a1 and a2 – 1st and 2nd abdominal; i – inguinal. Not to scale.	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEA5B07FCE6F992FDCCFA48.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476695/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476695	Figure 7: Skull of AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (NMW 43000) in dorsal, lateral and ventral views (from top to bottom). Arrows point on traits which are informative for taxonomic ranking of Xerini. 1 – lacrimal bone; 2-postorbital process of the frontal bone; 3 – anterior extension of the squamosal bone; 4 – parietointerparietal suture; 5 – interparietal suture; 6 – anteriorly projected external ridge on the front face of the zygomatic plate; 7 – jugal bone; 8 – opisthodont upper incisor; 9 – masseteric tubercle; 10 – buccinator foramen; 11 – masticatory foramen; 12 – posterior margin of hard palate; 13 – external meatUS acUSticUS.	Figure 7: Skull of AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (NMW 43000) in dorsal, lateral and ventral views (from top to bottom). Arrows point on traits which are informative for taxonomic ranking of Xerini. 1 – lacrimal bone; 2-postorbital process of the frontal bone; 3 – anterior extension of the squamosal bone; 4 – parietointerparietal suture; 5 – interparietal suture; 6 – anteriorly projected external ridge on the front face of the zygomatic plate; 7 – jugal bone; 8 – opisthodont upper incisor; 9 – masseteric tubercle; 10 – buccinator foramen; 11 – masticatory foramen; 12 – posterior margin of hard palate; 13 – external meatUS acUSticUS.	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEA5B07FCE6F992FDCCFA48.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476699/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476699	Figure 9: Distributional ranges of Xerini. Fossil (Late Oligocene to Early Pleistocene) records (top inset) are based on Fortelius (2015) with corrections and additions from Gromov and Erbajeva (1995), Kozhamkulova and Bendukidze (2005), Winkler et al. (2010), Flynn and Wessels (2013), and Maridet et al. (2014). Map of recent ranges (inset below) does not show the isolate of EUxerUS erythroPUS in Morocco, and the population of AtlantoxerUS getUlUS introduced to Fuerteventura, Canary Islands.	Figure 9: Distributional ranges of Xerini. Fossil (Late Oligocene to Early Pleistocene) records (top inset) are based on Fortelius (2015) with corrections and additions from Gromov and Erbajeva (1995), Kozhamkulova and Bendukidze (2005), Winkler et al. (2010), Flynn and Wessels (2013), and Maridet et al. (2014). Map of recent ranges (inset below) does not show the isolate of EUxerUS erythroPUS in Morocco, and the population of AtlantoxerUS getUlUS introduced to Fuerteventura, Canary Islands.	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEB5B07FF5AFA0DFB89FE31.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476685/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476685	Figure 2: Representatives of genera in African bristly ground squirrels Xerina: 1 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (Fuerteventura, Canary Islands; photo courtesy Alenka KryŠtufek); 2 – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (Etosha National Park, Namibia; photo courtesy Emmanuel Do Linh San); 3 – XerUS rUtilUS (Samburu National Park, Kenya; photo by Jan Matějů); 4 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (captive; photo courtesy Klaus Rudloff).	Figure 2: Representatives of genera in African bristly ground squirrels Xerina: 1 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (Fuerteventura, Canary Islands; photo courtesy Alenka KryŠtufek); 2 – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (Etosha National Park, Namibia; photo courtesy Emmanuel Do Linh San); 3 – XerUS rUtilUS (Samburu National Park, Kenya; photo by Jan Matějů); 4 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (captive; photo courtesy Klaus Rudloff).	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEB5B07FF5AFA0DFB89FE31.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476689/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476689	Figure 4: Right front paw (ventral view) in (1) SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (ZFMK 92.478) and (2) AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (NMW 28084). Roman numerals correspond to digits (No. I is the thumb); a.v. – antebrachial vibrissae. Note that digit III is longer than either digits II and IV. Also note differences in length of claws (decidedly longer in SPermoPhiloPSiS) and in hairiness of the palm (nude in AtlantoxerUS). Not to scale.	Figure 4: Right front paw (ventral view) in (1) SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (ZFMK 92.478) and (2) AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (NMW 28084). Roman numerals correspond to digits (No. I is the thumb); a.v. – antebrachial vibrissae. Note that digit III is longer than either digits II and IV. Also note differences in length of claws (decidedly longer in SPermoPhiloPSiS) and in hairiness of the palm (nude in AtlantoxerUS). Not to scale.	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEB5B07FF5AFA0DFB89FE31.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476695/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476695	Figure 7: Skull of AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (NMW 43000) in dorsal, lateral and ventral views (from top to bottom). Arrows point on traits which are informative for taxonomic ranking of Xerini. 1 – lacrimal bone; 2-postorbital process of the frontal bone; 3 – anterior extension of the squamosal bone; 4 – parietointerparietal suture; 5 – interparietal suture; 6 – anteriorly projected external ridge on the front face of the zygomatic plate; 7 – jugal bone; 8 – opisthodont upper incisor; 9 – masseteric tubercle; 10 – buccinator foramen; 11 – masticatory foramen; 12 – posterior margin of hard palate; 13 – external meatUS acUSticUS.	Figure 7: Skull of AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (NMW 43000) in dorsal, lateral and ventral views (from top to bottom). Arrows point on traits which are informative for taxonomic ranking of Xerini. 1 – lacrimal bone; 2-postorbital process of the frontal bone; 3 – anterior extension of the squamosal bone; 4 – parietointerparietal suture; 5 – interparietal suture; 6 – anteriorly projected external ridge on the front face of the zygomatic plate; 7 – jugal bone; 8 – opisthodont upper incisor; 9 – masseteric tubercle; 10 – buccinator foramen; 11 – masticatory foramen; 12 – posterior margin of hard palate; 13 – external meatUS acUSticUS.	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEB5B00FCC4FC20FE85FE59.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476685/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476685	Figure 2: Representatives of genera in African bristly ground squirrels Xerina: 1 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (Fuerteventura, Canary Islands; photo courtesy Alenka KryŠtufek); 2 – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (Etosha National Park, Namibia; photo courtesy Emmanuel Do Linh San); 3 – XerUS rUtilUS (Samburu National Park, Kenya; photo by Jan Matějů); 4 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (captive; photo courtesy Klaus Rudloff).	Figure 2: Representatives of genera in African bristly ground squirrels Xerina: 1 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (Fuerteventura, Canary Islands; photo courtesy Alenka KryŠtufek); 2 – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (Etosha National Park, Namibia; photo courtesy Emmanuel Do Linh San); 3 – XerUS rUtilUS (Samburu National Park, Kenya; photo by Jan Matějů); 4 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (captive; photo courtesy Klaus Rudloff).	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEB5B00FCC4FC20FE85FE59.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476693/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476693	Figure 6: Bivariate plot of six Xerini species onto the first two principal components (PC) derived from ordination of nine cranial measurements (transformed to log10). Percentage of variance explained by individual PC is in parentheses. 95% confidence ellipses show the dispersion of all specimens within each species and letters indicate group centroids. Skulls (in dorsal view) are depicted to scale: A – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (PMS 19301); E – EUxerUS erythroPUS (ZFMK 47.972); Gi – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (NMW 32092); GP – GeoSciUrUS PrincePS (NMW 32097); S – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (NMW 25782); X – XerUS rUtilUS (ZFMK 81.234).	Figure 6: Bivariate plot of six Xerini species onto the first two principal components (PC) derived from ordination of nine cranial measurements (transformed to log10). Percentage of variance explained by individual PC is in parentheses. 95% confidence ellipses show the dispersion of all specimens within each species and letters indicate group centroids. Skulls (in dorsal view) are depicted to scale: A – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (PMS 19301); E – EUxerUS erythroPUS (ZFMK 47.972); Gi – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (NMW 32092); GP – GeoSciUrUS PrincePS (NMW 32097); S – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (NMW 25782); X – XerUS rUtilUS (ZFMK 81.234).	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEB5B00FCC4FC20FE85FE59.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476697/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476697	Figure 8: Left maxillary (above) and right mandibular (below) toothrows in Xerini: 1 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (NHML 69.10.24.18/ZFMK 97.467), 2 – XerUS rUtilUS (ZFMK 81.234/ZFMK 96.251); 3 – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (ZFMK 55.147); 4 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (PMS 19301 / ZFMK 88.195); 5 – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (ZFMK 92.497/ ZFMK 92.496). Abbreviations for cheek-teeth: P/p – upper/lower premolar, M/m – upper/lower molar; numbers refer to a position in the tooth-row. Scale bar=2 mm.	Figure 8: Left maxillary (above) and right mandibular (below) toothrows in Xerini: 1 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (NHML 69.10.24.18/ZFMK 97.467), 2 – XerUS rUtilUS (ZFMK 81.234/ZFMK 96.251); 3 – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (ZFMK 55.147); 4 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (PMS 19301 / ZFMK 88.195); 5 – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (ZFMK 92.497/ ZFMK 92.496). Abbreviations for cheek-teeth: P/p – upper/lower premolar, M/m – upper/lower molar; numbers refer to a position in the tooth-row. Scale bar=2 mm.	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEB5B00FCC4FC20FE85FE59.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476699/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476699	Figure 9: Distributional ranges of Xerini. Fossil (Late Oligocene to Early Pleistocene) records (top inset) are based on Fortelius (2015) with corrections and additions from Gromov and Erbajeva (1995), Kozhamkulova and Bendukidze (2005), Winkler et al. (2010), Flynn and Wessels (2013), and Maridet et al. (2014). Map of recent ranges (inset below) does not show the isolate of EUxerUS erythroPUS in Morocco, and the population of AtlantoxerUS getUlUS introduced to Fuerteventura, Canary Islands.	Figure 9: Distributional ranges of Xerini. Fossil (Late Oligocene to Early Pleistocene) records (top inset) are based on Fortelius (2015) with corrections and additions from Gromov and Erbajeva (1995), Kozhamkulova and Bendukidze (2005), Winkler et al. (2010), Flynn and Wessels (2013), and Maridet et al. (2014). Map of recent ranges (inset below) does not show the isolate of EUxerUS erythroPUS in Morocco, and the population of AtlantoxerUS getUlUS introduced to Fuerteventura, Canary Islands.	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEC5B00FF74FB72FBB4F95B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476685/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476685	Figure 2: Representatives of genera in African bristly ground squirrels Xerina: 1 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (Fuerteventura, Canary Islands; photo courtesy Alenka KryŠtufek); 2 – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (Etosha National Park, Namibia; photo courtesy Emmanuel Do Linh San); 3 – XerUS rUtilUS (Samburu National Park, Kenya; photo by Jan Matějů); 4 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (captive; photo courtesy Klaus Rudloff).	Figure 2: Representatives of genera in African bristly ground squirrels Xerina: 1 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (Fuerteventura, Canary Islands; photo courtesy Alenka KryŠtufek); 2 – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (Etosha National Park, Namibia; photo courtesy Emmanuel Do Linh San); 3 – XerUS rUtilUS (Samburu National Park, Kenya; photo by Jan Matějů); 4 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (captive; photo courtesy Klaus Rudloff).	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEC5B00FF74FB72FBB4F95B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476693/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476693	Figure 6: Bivariate plot of six Xerini species onto the first two principal components (PC) derived from ordination of nine cranial measurements (transformed to log10). Percentage of variance explained by individual PC is in parentheses. 95% confidence ellipses show the dispersion of all specimens within each species and letters indicate group centroids. Skulls (in dorsal view) are depicted to scale: A – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (PMS 19301); E – EUxerUS erythroPUS (ZFMK 47.972); Gi – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (NMW 32092); GP – GeoSciUrUS PrincePS (NMW 32097); S – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (NMW 25782); X – XerUS rUtilUS (ZFMK 81.234).	Figure 6: Bivariate plot of six Xerini species onto the first two principal components (PC) derived from ordination of nine cranial measurements (transformed to log10). Percentage of variance explained by individual PC is in parentheses. 95% confidence ellipses show the dispersion of all specimens within each species and letters indicate group centroids. Skulls (in dorsal view) are depicted to scale: A – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (PMS 19301); E – EUxerUS erythroPUS (ZFMK 47.972); Gi – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (NMW 32092); GP – GeoSciUrUS PrincePS (NMW 32097); S – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (NMW 25782); X – XerUS rUtilUS (ZFMK 81.234).	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEC5B00FF74FB72FBB4F95B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476697/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476697	Figure 8: Left maxillary (above) and right mandibular (below) toothrows in Xerini: 1 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (NHML 69.10.24.18/ZFMK 97.467), 2 – XerUS rUtilUS (ZFMK 81.234/ZFMK 96.251); 3 – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (ZFMK 55.147); 4 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (PMS 19301 / ZFMK 88.195); 5 – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (ZFMK 92.497/ ZFMK 92.496). Abbreviations for cheek-teeth: P/p – upper/lower premolar, M/m – upper/lower molar; numbers refer to a position in the tooth-row. Scale bar=2 mm.	Figure 8: Left maxillary (above) and right mandibular (below) toothrows in Xerini: 1 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (NHML 69.10.24.18/ZFMK 97.467), 2 – XerUS rUtilUS (ZFMK 81.234/ZFMK 96.251); 3 – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (ZFMK 55.147); 4 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (PMS 19301 / ZFMK 88.195); 5 – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (ZFMK 92.497/ ZFMK 92.496). Abbreviations for cheek-teeth: P/p – upper/lower premolar, M/m – upper/lower molar; numbers refer to a position in the tooth-row. Scale bar=2 mm.	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEC5B00FF74FB72FBB4F95B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476691/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476691	Figure 5: Nipples in (1) SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (ZFMK 92.496) and (2) EUxerUS erythroPUS (ZFMK 76.38): p – pectoral; a1 and a2 – 1st and 2nd abdominal; i – inguinal. Not to scale.	Figure 5: Nipples in (1) SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (ZFMK 92.496) and (2) EUxerUS erythroPUS (ZFMK 76.38): p – pectoral; a1 and a2 – 1st and 2nd abdominal; i – inguinal. Not to scale.	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEC5B00FF74FB72FBB4F95B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476701/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476701	Figure 10: Anterior zygomatic arch in three genera of Xerini to show differences in a suture between the lacrimal (lac), the maxillary (max) and the jugal (ju) bones. 1 – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (NMW 32092); 2 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (NMW 43000); 3 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (ZFMK 97.472). Arrow points on a wedge-like extension of the jugal between the lacrimal and maxillary in SPermoPhiloPSiS and AtlantoxerUS. A bluntly truncated top of jugal bone at the lacrimal bone which is distinctive of sub-Saharan Xerina, is shown by triangle. Not to scale.	Figure 10: Anterior zygomatic arch in three genera of Xerini to show differences in a suture between the lacrimal (lac), the maxillary (max) and the jugal (ju) bones. 1 – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (NMW 32092); 2 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (NMW 43000); 3 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (ZFMK 97.472). Arrow points on a wedge-like extension of the jugal between the lacrimal and maxillary in SPermoPhiloPSiS and AtlantoxerUS. A bluntly truncated top of jugal bone at the lacrimal bone which is distinctive of sub-Saharan Xerina, is shown by triangle. Not to scale.	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFED5B02FF5AFA40FE36FF2E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476685/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476685	Figure 2: Representatives of genera in African bristly ground squirrels Xerina: 1 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (Fuerteventura, Canary Islands; photo courtesy Alenka KryŠtufek); 2 – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (Etosha National Park, Namibia; photo courtesy Emmanuel Do Linh San); 3 – XerUS rUtilUS (Samburu National Park, Kenya; photo by Jan Matějů); 4 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (captive; photo courtesy Klaus Rudloff).	Figure 2: Representatives of genera in African bristly ground squirrels Xerina: 1 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (Fuerteventura, Canary Islands; photo courtesy Alenka KryŠtufek); 2 – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (Etosha National Park, Namibia; photo courtesy Emmanuel Do Linh San); 3 – XerUS rUtilUS (Samburu National Park, Kenya; photo by Jan Matějů); 4 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (captive; photo courtesy Klaus Rudloff).	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFED5B02FF5AFA40FE36FF2E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476693/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476693	Figure 6: Bivariate plot of six Xerini species onto the first two principal components (PC) derived from ordination of nine cranial measurements (transformed to log10). Percentage of variance explained by individual PC is in parentheses. 95% confidence ellipses show the dispersion of all specimens within each species and letters indicate group centroids. Skulls (in dorsal view) are depicted to scale: A – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (PMS 19301); E – EUxerUS erythroPUS (ZFMK 47.972); Gi – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (NMW 32092); GP – GeoSciUrUS PrincePS (NMW 32097); S – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (NMW 25782); X – XerUS rUtilUS (ZFMK 81.234).	Figure 6: Bivariate plot of six Xerini species onto the first two principal components (PC) derived from ordination of nine cranial measurements (transformed to log10). Percentage of variance explained by individual PC is in parentheses. 95% confidence ellipses show the dispersion of all specimens within each species and letters indicate group centroids. Skulls (in dorsal view) are depicted to scale: A – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (PMS 19301); E – EUxerUS erythroPUS (ZFMK 47.972); Gi – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (NMW 32092); GP – GeoSciUrUS PrincePS (NMW 32097); S – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (NMW 25782); X – XerUS rUtilUS (ZFMK 81.234).	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFED5B02FF5AFA40FE36FF2E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476697/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476697	Figure 8: Left maxillary (above) and right mandibular (below) toothrows in Xerini: 1 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (NHML 69.10.24.18/ZFMK 97.467), 2 – XerUS rUtilUS (ZFMK 81.234/ZFMK 96.251); 3 – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (ZFMK 55.147); 4 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (PMS 19301 / ZFMK 88.195); 5 – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (ZFMK 92.497/ ZFMK 92.496). Abbreviations for cheek-teeth: P/p – upper/lower premolar, M/m – upper/lower molar; numbers refer to a position in the tooth-row. Scale bar=2 mm.	Figure 8: Left maxillary (above) and right mandibular (below) toothrows in Xerini: 1 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (NHML 69.10.24.18/ZFMK 97.467), 2 – XerUS rUtilUS (ZFMK 81.234/ZFMK 96.251); 3 – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (ZFMK 55.147); 4 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (PMS 19301 / ZFMK 88.195); 5 – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (ZFMK 92.497/ ZFMK 92.496). Abbreviations for cheek-teeth: P/p – upper/lower premolar, M/m – upper/lower molar; numbers refer to a position in the tooth-row. Scale bar=2 mm.	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFED5B02FF5AFA40FE36FF2E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476699/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476699	Figure 9: Distributional ranges of Xerini. Fossil (Late Oligocene to Early Pleistocene) records (top inset) are based on Fortelius (2015) with corrections and additions from Gromov and Erbajeva (1995), Kozhamkulova and Bendukidze (2005), Winkler et al. (2010), Flynn and Wessels (2013), and Maridet et al. (2014). Map of recent ranges (inset below) does not show the isolate of EUxerUS erythroPUS in Morocco, and the population of AtlantoxerUS getUlUS introduced to Fuerteventura, Canary Islands.	Figure 9: Distributional ranges of Xerini. Fossil (Late Oligocene to Early Pleistocene) records (top inset) are based on Fortelius (2015) with corrections and additions from Gromov and Erbajeva (1995), Kozhamkulova and Bendukidze (2005), Winkler et al. (2010), Flynn and Wessels (2013), and Maridet et al. (2014). Map of recent ranges (inset below) does not show the isolate of EUxerUS erythroPUS in Morocco, and the population of AtlantoxerUS getUlUS introduced to Fuerteventura, Canary Islands.	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEE5B02FF74FD76FCB2FCBE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476685/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476685	Figure 2: Representatives of genera in African bristly ground squirrels Xerina: 1 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (Fuerteventura, Canary Islands; photo courtesy Alenka KryŠtufek); 2 – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (Etosha National Park, Namibia; photo courtesy Emmanuel Do Linh San); 3 – XerUS rUtilUS (Samburu National Park, Kenya; photo by Jan Matějů); 4 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (captive; photo courtesy Klaus Rudloff).	Figure 2: Representatives of genera in African bristly ground squirrels Xerina: 1 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (Fuerteventura, Canary Islands; photo courtesy Alenka KryŠtufek); 2 – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (Etosha National Park, Namibia; photo courtesy Emmanuel Do Linh San); 3 – XerUS rUtilUS (Samburu National Park, Kenya; photo by Jan Matějů); 4 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (captive; photo courtesy Klaus Rudloff).	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEE5B02FF74FD76FCB2FCBE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476695/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476695	Figure 7: Skull of AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (NMW 43000) in dorsal, lateral and ventral views (from top to bottom). Arrows point on traits which are informative for taxonomic ranking of Xerini. 1 – lacrimal bone; 2-postorbital process of the frontal bone; 3 – anterior extension of the squamosal bone; 4 – parietointerparietal suture; 5 – interparietal suture; 6 – anteriorly projected external ridge on the front face of the zygomatic plate; 7 – jugal bone; 8 – opisthodont upper incisor; 9 – masseteric tubercle; 10 – buccinator foramen; 11 – masticatory foramen; 12 – posterior margin of hard palate; 13 – external meatUS acUSticUS.	Figure 7: Skull of AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (NMW 43000) in dorsal, lateral and ventral views (from top to bottom). Arrows point on traits which are informative for taxonomic ranking of Xerini. 1 – lacrimal bone; 2-postorbital process of the frontal bone; 3 – anterior extension of the squamosal bone; 4 – parietointerparietal suture; 5 – interparietal suture; 6 – anteriorly projected external ridge on the front face of the zygomatic plate; 7 – jugal bone; 8 – opisthodont upper incisor; 9 – masseteric tubercle; 10 – buccinator foramen; 11 – masticatory foramen; 12 – posterior margin of hard palate; 13 – external meatUS acUSticUS.	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEE5B02FF74FD76FCB2FCBE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476701/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476701	Figure 10: Anterior zygomatic arch in three genera of Xerini to show differences in a suture between the lacrimal (lac), the maxillary (max) and the jugal (ju) bones. 1 – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (NMW 32092); 2 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (NMW 43000); 3 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (ZFMK 97.472). Arrow points on a wedge-like extension of the jugal between the lacrimal and maxillary in SPermoPhiloPSiS and AtlantoxerUS. A bluntly truncated top of jugal bone at the lacrimal bone which is distinctive of sub-Saharan Xerina, is shown by triangle. Not to scale.	Figure 10: Anterior zygomatic arch in three genera of Xerini to show differences in a suture between the lacrimal (lac), the maxillary (max) and the jugal (ju) bones. 1 – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (NMW 32092); 2 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (NMW 43000); 3 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (ZFMK 97.472). Arrow points on a wedge-like extension of the jugal between the lacrimal and maxillary in SPermoPhiloPSiS and AtlantoxerUS. A bluntly truncated top of jugal bone at the lacrimal bone which is distinctive of sub-Saharan Xerina, is shown by triangle. Not to scale.	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEE5B02FF74FD76FCB2FCBE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476697/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476697	Figure 8: Left maxillary (above) and right mandibular (below) toothrows in Xerini: 1 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (NHML 69.10.24.18/ZFMK 97.467), 2 – XerUS rUtilUS (ZFMK 81.234/ZFMK 96.251); 3 – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (ZFMK 55.147); 4 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (PMS 19301 / ZFMK 88.195); 5 – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (ZFMK 92.497/ ZFMK 92.496). Abbreviations for cheek-teeth: P/p – upper/lower premolar, M/m – upper/lower molar; numbers refer to a position in the tooth-row. Scale bar=2 mm.	Figure 8: Left maxillary (above) and right mandibular (below) toothrows in Xerini: 1 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (NHML 69.10.24.18/ZFMK 97.467), 2 – XerUS rUtilUS (ZFMK 81.234/ZFMK 96.251); 3 – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (ZFMK 55.147); 4 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (PMS 19301 / ZFMK 88.195); 5 – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (ZFMK 92.497/ ZFMK 92.496). Abbreviations for cheek-teeth: P/p – upper/lower premolar, M/m – upper/lower molar; numbers refer to a position in the tooth-row. Scale bar=2 mm.	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEE5B02FF74FD76FCB2FCBE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476699/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476699	Figure 9: Distributional ranges of Xerini. Fossil (Late Oligocene to Early Pleistocene) records (top inset) are based on Fortelius (2015) with corrections and additions from Gromov and Erbajeva (1995), Kozhamkulova and Bendukidze (2005), Winkler et al. (2010), Flynn and Wessels (2013), and Maridet et al. (2014). Map of recent ranges (inset below) does not show the isolate of EUxerUS erythroPUS in Morocco, and the population of AtlantoxerUS getUlUS introduced to Fuerteventura, Canary Islands.	Figure 9: Distributional ranges of Xerini. Fossil (Late Oligocene to Early Pleistocene) records (top inset) are based on Fortelius (2015) with corrections and additions from Gromov and Erbajeva (1995), Kozhamkulova and Bendukidze (2005), Winkler et al. (2010), Flynn and Wessels (2013), and Maridet et al. (2014). Map of recent ranges (inset below) does not show the isolate of EUxerUS erythroPUS in Morocco, and the population of AtlantoxerUS getUlUS introduced to Fuerteventura, Canary Islands.	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEE5B03FCE6FA6FFE09FA48.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476687/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476687	Figure 3: Long-clawed ground squirrel SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (Kyzyl Kum, Kazakhstan; photo courtesy Nedko Nedyalkov).	Figure 3: Long-clawed ground squirrel SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (Kyzyl Kum, Kazakhstan; photo courtesy Nedko Nedyalkov).	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEE5B03FCE6FA6FFE09FA48.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476689/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476689	Figure 4: Right front paw (ventral view) in (1) SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (ZFMK 92.478) and (2) AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (NMW 28084). Roman numerals correspond to digits (No. I is the thumb); a.v. – antebrachial vibrissae. Note that digit III is longer than either digits II and IV. Also note differences in length of claws (decidedly longer in SPermoPhiloPSiS) and in hairiness of the palm (nude in AtlantoxerUS). Not to scale.	Figure 4: Right front paw (ventral view) in (1) SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (ZFMK 92.478) and (2) AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (NMW 28084). Roman numerals correspond to digits (No. I is the thumb); a.v. – antebrachial vibrissae. Note that digit III is longer than either digits II and IV. Also note differences in length of claws (decidedly longer in SPermoPhiloPSiS) and in hairiness of the palm (nude in AtlantoxerUS). Not to scale.	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEE5B03FCE6FA6FFE09FA48.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476693/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476693	Figure 6: Bivariate plot of six Xerini species onto the first two principal components (PC) derived from ordination of nine cranial measurements (transformed to log10). Percentage of variance explained by individual PC is in parentheses. 95% confidence ellipses show the dispersion of all specimens within each species and letters indicate group centroids. Skulls (in dorsal view) are depicted to scale: A – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (PMS 19301); E – EUxerUS erythroPUS (ZFMK 47.972); Gi – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (NMW 32092); GP – GeoSciUrUS PrincePS (NMW 32097); S – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (NMW 25782); X – XerUS rUtilUS (ZFMK 81.234).	Figure 6: Bivariate plot of six Xerini species onto the first two principal components (PC) derived from ordination of nine cranial measurements (transformed to log10). Percentage of variance explained by individual PC is in parentheses. 95% confidence ellipses show the dispersion of all specimens within each species and letters indicate group centroids. Skulls (in dorsal view) are depicted to scale: A – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (PMS 19301); E – EUxerUS erythroPUS (ZFMK 47.972); Gi – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (NMW 32092); GP – GeoSciUrUS PrincePS (NMW 32097); S – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (NMW 25782); X – XerUS rUtilUS (ZFMK 81.234).	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEE5B03FCE6FA6FFE09FA48.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476701/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476701	Figure 10: Anterior zygomatic arch in three genera of Xerini to show differences in a suture between the lacrimal (lac), the maxillary (max) and the jugal (ju) bones. 1 – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (NMW 32092); 2 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (NMW 43000); 3 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (ZFMK 97.472). Arrow points on a wedge-like extension of the jugal between the lacrimal and maxillary in SPermoPhiloPSiS and AtlantoxerUS. A bluntly truncated top of jugal bone at the lacrimal bone which is distinctive of sub-Saharan Xerina, is shown by triangle. Not to scale.	Figure 10: Anterior zygomatic arch in three genera of Xerini to show differences in a suture between the lacrimal (lac), the maxillary (max) and the jugal (ju) bones. 1 – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (NMW 32092); 2 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (NMW 43000); 3 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (ZFMK 97.472). Arrow points on a wedge-like extension of the jugal between the lacrimal and maxillary in SPermoPhiloPSiS and AtlantoxerUS. A bluntly truncated top of jugal bone at the lacrimal bone which is distinctive of sub-Saharan Xerina, is shown by triangle. Not to scale.	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEE5B03FCE6FA6FFE09FA48.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476697/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476697	Figure 8: Left maxillary (above) and right mandibular (below) toothrows in Xerini: 1 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (NHML 69.10.24.18/ZFMK 97.467), 2 – XerUS rUtilUS (ZFMK 81.234/ZFMK 96.251); 3 – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (ZFMK 55.147); 4 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (PMS 19301 / ZFMK 88.195); 5 – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (ZFMK 92.497/ ZFMK 92.496). Abbreviations for cheek-teeth: P/p – upper/lower premolar, M/m – upper/lower molar; numbers refer to a position in the tooth-row. Scale bar=2 mm.	Figure 8: Left maxillary (above) and right mandibular (below) toothrows in Xerini: 1 – EUxerUS erythroPUS (NHML 69.10.24.18/ZFMK 97.467), 2 – XerUS rUtilUS (ZFMK 81.234/ZFMK 96.251); 3 – GeoSciUrUS inaUriS (ZFMK 55.147); 4 – AtlantoxerUS getUlUS (PMS 19301 / ZFMK 88.195); 5 – SPermoPhiloPSiS lePtodactylUS (ZFMK 92.497/ ZFMK 92.496). Abbreviations for cheek-teeth: P/p – upper/lower premolar, M/m – upper/lower molar; numbers refer to a position in the tooth-row. Scale bar=2 mm.	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
03EE87BAFFEE5B03FCE6FA6FFE09FA48.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10476699/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476699	Figure 9: Distributional ranges of Xerini. Fossil (Late Oligocene to Early Pleistocene) records (top inset) are based on Fortelius (2015) with corrections and additions from Gromov and Erbajeva (1995), Kozhamkulova and Bendukidze (2005), Winkler et al. (2010), Flynn and Wessels (2013), and Maridet et al. (2014). Map of recent ranges (inset below) does not show the isolate of EUxerUS erythroPUS in Morocco, and the population of AtlantoxerUS getUlUS introduced to Fuerteventura, Canary Islands.	Figure 9: Distributional ranges of Xerini. Fossil (Late Oligocene to Early Pleistocene) records (top inset) are based on Fortelius (2015) with corrections and additions from Gromov and Erbajeva (1995), Kozhamkulova and Bendukidze (2005), Winkler et al. (2010), Flynn and Wessels (2013), and Maridet et al. (2014). Map of recent ranges (inset below) does not show the isolate of EUxerUS erythroPUS in Morocco, and the population of AtlantoxerUS getUlUS introduced to Fuerteventura, Canary Islands.	2015-12-12	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer		Zenodo	biologists	Kryštufek, Boris;Mahmoudi, Ahmad;Tesakov, Alexey S.;Matějů, Jan;Hutterer, Rainer			
