identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03EEB12ED4500554FF14FF4EFDF3FB76.text	03EEB12ED4500554FF14FF4EFDF3FB76.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Myrcia bicarinata	<div><p>1. Myrcia bicarinata (O. Berg 1857 –1859: 118) D. Legrand (1961: 298)</p> <p>≡ Aulomyrcia bicarinata O.Berg. Type:— BRAZIL (“Brasilia” on label). No date (fl.), Sellow s.n. (lectotype P [P00161322]! designated here, isolectotypes BM!, BR!, F!, K!, LE!, P [P00161321]!, U [image!], W!). Figure 1.</p> <p>= Aulomyrcia rufa O. Berg (1857 –1859: 65). Myrcia rufa (O.Berg) N. Silveira (1985a: 66), syn. nov. Type:— BRAZIL (“Brasilia” on label). No date (fl.), Sellow s.n. (lectotype K [K000344213]! designated here, isolectotypes BM!, BR!, F!, LE!, P!, W!). Figure 2.</p> <p>Aulomyrcia bicarinata:—Specimens of Aulomyrcia bicarinata seen by Berg with certainty are those bearing his handwriting on the label (BR, LE, P and U herbaria). The duplicate of the P herbarium (Figure 1) was chosen as the lectotype as it matches the protologue and is representative of the species morphology. The number “431” appears in the label of some duplicates (in the BR, F, P, U and W herbaria).</p> <p>A fragment of material at the F herbarium is indicated to be from a Sellow collection of A. bicarinata at the P herbarium. Despite the scarcity of material (a fragment of leaf and some flowers), it is morphologically similar to the other type specimens and the number written on the label is the same present in other duplicates (“431”). Thus, we also considered this specimen as an isolectotype. The localities on the labels (if present, “Brasilia”, i.e., Brazil) and in the protologue (“Brasilia meridionali”) are vague but congruent with the species distribution and Sellow’s route (Herter &amp; Rambo 1953).</p> <p>Aulomyrcia rufa:— Govaerts et al. (2015) considered Aulomyrcia rufa to be a synonym of Myrcia pulchra (O.Berg) Kiaerskou, but analysis of the available collections of A. rufa shows it to be a synonym of Myrcia bicarinata. Both species share a mainly monopodial branching pattern (vs. mainly sympodial in M. pulchra) and keeled young twigs (vs. young twigs not keeled), characters that do not vary intraspecifically in clade 7 (Santos 2014). Examination of multiple specimens did not reveal relevant differences between these species. Both A. rufa and A. bicarinata were described in the same publication and A. bicarinata was chosen as the specific epithet refers to the diagnostic keeled young twigs.</p> <p>Again, there is fragmentary material in the F herbarium (accession number 936962) identified as a Sellow collection of A. rufa from the P herbarium. The number written on the label is the same as on other duplicates (“466”, see below). The material is poor (a piece of a young twig with leaves and one flower). The branch morphology is similar to the morphology of other type duplicates, but the flower is clearly from another species (globose, with five persistent lobes). We consider the twig as part of the type gathering, but exclude the flower assuming it to be included in error.</p> <p>The material housed in the herbarium of the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew (K) (Figure 2) was chosen as the lectotype because its label bears Berg’s handwriting (“ Aulomyrcia rufa Bg ”); the specimen matches the protologue well and is representative of the species’ morphology. Type collections of A. rufa with Berg’s handwriting are also found in other herbaria (BR, LE, P and W). The number “466” is present in the label of some specimens (BR, F, K, LE, P and W herbaria, and there is also the number “279” in LE and W). As for A. bicarinata, the localities in the labels (“Brasilia”, if present) and in the protologue (“Prov. Rio de Janeiro ”) are vague but agree with the species distribution and Sellow’s route (Herter &amp; Rambo 1953).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EEB12ED4500554FF14FF4EFDF3FB76	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Santos, Matheus F.;Sano, Paulo T.;Lucas, Eve	Santos, Matheus F., Sano, Paulo T., Lucas, Eve (2016): Lectotypifications of some Nineteenth Century names and other nomenclatural updates in Myrcia s. l. (Myrtaceae). Phytotaxa 257 (1): 448-450, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1
03EEB12ED4560554FF14FB44FE07F9C6.text	03EEB12ED4560554FF14FB44FE07F9C6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Myrcia bicolor Kiaerskou 1893	<div><p>2. Myrcia bicolor Kiaerskou (1893: 65)</p> <p>Type:— BRAZIL. Rio de Janeiro: Floresta da Tijuca [“Brésil (Rio Jan.) Floresta da Tijuca” on label], 20 November 1878 (fl.), Glaziou 10797 (lectotype C [C 10015825]! designated here, isolectotypes BR!, C [C 10015826]!, F!, K!, LE!, NY!, P!, R!, US!). Figure 3.</p> <p>There are two sheets of Myrcia bicolor at C, both bearing the author’s handwriting (“ Myrcia (Aulomyrcia) bicolor ”). Aulomyrcia is the subgenus where the author placed the species (Kiaerskou 1893). The leaf illustrated in the protologue (Tab. V, f; Kiaerskou 1893) was drawn from the lectotype (Figure 3); a draft of the illustration is attached to the sheet. The locality present in some labels of the type collection (“Province de R. J. Floresta da Tijuca”, i.e., the Tijuca Forest in the municipality of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil) matches the species distribution and is considered to be the type locality.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EEB12ED4560554FF14FB44FE07F9C6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Santos, Matheus F.;Sano, Paulo T.;Lucas, Eve	Santos, Matheus F., Sano, Paulo T., Lucas, Eve (2016): Lectotypifications of some Nineteenth Century names and other nomenclatural updates in Myrcia s. l. (Myrtaceae). Phytotaxa 257 (1): 448-450, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1
03EEB12ED4560558FF14F914FBBCFB12.text	03EEB12ED4560558FF14F914FBBCFB12.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Myrcia densa (De Candolle 1828) Sobral 2006	<div><p>3. Myrcia densa (De Candolle 1828: 257) Sobral (2006: 136)</p> <p>≡ Calyptranthes densa DC. Aulomyrcia densa (DC.) O. Berg (1855 –1856: 37). Type:— BRAZIL. Minas Gerais, 1817 (fr.), Martius 144 (lectotype M [M-0136871]! designated here, isolectotypes G-DC!, M [M-0136872]!). Figure 4.</p> <p>= Aulomyrcia supraaxillaris O. Berg (1857 –1859: 69). Myrcia jacobinensis Mattos (1966: 60), syn. nov. Type:— BRAZIL. Bahia: Jacobina (“Bras., Jacobina” on label), 1841 (fl.), Blanchet 3368 (lectotype W [0040178]! designated here, isolectotypes BM!, C!, F!, G!, HAL [image!], LE!, MICH!, NY!, P!). Figure 5.</p> <p>Calyptranthes densa:— Sobral (2006) published the combination Myrcia densa and considered the material housed in the Botanische Staatssammlung München herbarium (M) to be a type. Sobral (2006) justified his choice by the morphology, which is congruent with the protologue and De Candolle’s annotation (“ C. densa ”) on the sheet. However,</p> <p>Sobral (2006) did not explicitly designate the specimen as lectotype and did not cite the sheet of C. densa at the Herbier de Candolle (G-DC). The typification of Calyptranthes densa is clarified here.</p> <p>The protologue of C. densa cites “v. s. in h. Mart.”, referring to Martius’ herbarium, whose collections from Brazil are mainly housed in the M herbarium (Stafleu &amp; Cowan 1981). Two sheets of C. densa collected by Martius are at M, one of them bearing De Candolle’s handwriting (“ Calyptranthes densa prod.”).</p> <p>The G-DC herbarium houses the reference collection of the Prodromus (De Candolle 1828, Stafleu &amp; Cowan 1976). Among these materials, a specimen of C. densa also bears the De Candolle’s annotation on the label (“ Calyptranthes densa DC. ”). The specimen at G-DC is incomplete, composed only of two short twigs with an infrutescence, as well as loose leaves and fruits; it was probably extracted from the collection at M. The sheets at M are more complete and represent the morphology of the species better. From material at M, the specimen with De Candolle’s handwriting was chosen as the lectotype (the same specimen previously cited by Sobral 2006; Figure 4).</p> <p>A photo identified as a B specimen of the type material of C. densa is present in herbaria at the University of Michigan (MICH) and New York Botanical Garden (NY); in fact this is of one of the M duplicates. Regarding the type locality, the material at M has “Minas” written on the label referring to Minas Gerais state in Brazil; this is congruent with the distribution of M. densa and Martius’ route in Brazil (Urban 1906), but is otherwise too vague to discern the exact type locality.</p> <p>Aulomyrcia supraaxillaris:—Analysis of the type collections of Calyptranthes densa and Aulomyrcia supraaxillaris alongside other material from herbarium collections and the field, showed that the two names are synonymous. Both species share diagnostic characters within clade 7 such as monopodial branching, keeled twigs, inconspicuous venation and inflorescences branching only once or twice at the base. The type material of A. supraaxillaris, collected from the Jacobina region (the type locality is discussed below) has wider leaves and thicker branches and inflorescences than average in the species. However, these differences are minor and not enough to recognize a different species.</p> <p>In the protologue of A. supraaxillaris, Berg (1857 –1859) cites the collection Blanchet 3368 at the B and Naturhistorisches Museum Wien (W) herbaria (“v. in hb. Berol. et Vindob.”). As the material at B has been destroyed, material at W was selected as the lectotype of A. supraaxillaris (Figure 5). Material at W also has Berg’s handwriting on the label (“ Aulomyrcia supraaxillaris Bg ”), as does a specimen at Martin-Luther-Universität herbarium (HAL). Mattos (1966) cited an isotype at the herbarium of the Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (IAN) but no type collection was found during a visit to that herbarium.</p> <p>The locality mentioned on some labels and in the protologue (“Jacobina”, i.e., the municipality of Jacobina, Bahia state, Brazil) is congruent with the species distribution and with the regions explored by Blanchet or his collaborators (Urban 1906). Jacobina is therefore considered the type locality of A. supraaxillaris.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EEB12ED4560558FF14F914FBBCFB12	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Santos, Matheus F.;Sano, Paulo T.;Lucas, Eve	Santos, Matheus F., Sano, Paulo T., Lucas, Eve (2016): Lectotypifications of some Nineteenth Century names and other nomenclatural updates in Myrcia s. l. (Myrtaceae). Phytotaxa 257 (1): 448-450, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1
03EEB12ED45A0558FF14FB60FABDF98E.text	03EEB12ED45A0558FF14FB60FABDF98E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Myrcia foveolata (B. Holst 2002) M. F. Santos 2016	<div><p>4. Myrcia foveolata (B. Holst 2002: 145) M.F.Santos, comb. nov.</p> <p>≡ Marlierea foveolata B.Holst. Type:— VENEZUELA. Amazonas: Departamento Atures, Sierra Maigualida, NW sector, small valley along an upper tibutary (sic) of Caño Iguana, 05˚30’N 65˚15’W, 2000 m, 28 February–3 March 1991 (fl.), Berry 4874 (holotype VEN [image!], isotypes MEXU [image!], MO!, SEL [image!])</p> <p>According to recent phylogenetic studies in Myrcia s.l. (Lucas et al. 2011, Santos 2014), synonymization of Marlierea species in Myrcia is recommended if monophyletic, intuitive taxonomic groups are desired (Lucas &amp; Sobral 2011), which is the motivation for the new combination made here. In addition, Myrcia foveolata possesses free calyx lobes and a non-tearing hypanthium at anthesis, characters that conflict with the diagnostic features of Marlierea.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EEB12ED45A0558FF14FB60FABDF98E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Santos, Matheus F.;Sano, Paulo T.;Lucas, Eve	Santos, Matheus F., Sano, Paulo T., Lucas, Eve (2016): Lectotypifications of some Nineteenth Century names and other nomenclatural updates in Myrcia s. l. (Myrtaceae). Phytotaxa 257 (1): 448-450, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1
03EEB12ED45A0559FF14F9DCFA0FFE2A.text	03EEB12ED45A0559FF14F9DCFA0FFE2A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Myrcia lenheirensis Kiaerskou 1893	<div><p>5. Myrcia lenheirensis Kiaerskou (1893: 98)</p> <p>≡ Eugeniopsis angustifolia O. Berg (1857 –1859: 143). Marlierea angustifolia (O.Berg) Mattos (1967: 333). Type:— BRAZIL (“Brasilia” on label). No date (fl.), Sellow s.n. (lectotype K [K000330701]! designated here, isolectotypes BR!, LE!, P!). Figure 6.</p> <p>The name Marlierea angustifolia has been commonly used to identify this species (Govaerts et al. 2015, Sobral et al. 2015). However, Myrcia lenheirensis is the correct name. The species is more properly placed in Myrcia due to morphological discordance of the species with the morphology of Marlierea (it has free calyx lobes and a hypanthium not tearing after the anthesis) and the ongoing synonymization of Marlierea in Myrcia. The new name M. lenheirensis was proposed by Kiaerskou (1893) because of the older name Myrcia angustifolia (O. Berg 1857 –1859: 135) Niedenzu (1893: 76).</p> <p>The material at K (Figure 6)was chosen as the lectotype because it has Berg’s handwriting on the label (“ Eugeniopsis angustifolia Bg ”) and the material matches well with the protologue and represents the species’ morphology. The labels on the type collections in the Botanic Garden Meise (BR) and V. L. Komarov Botanical Institute (LE) herbaria also bear Berg’s annotation. Material at K and LE have the number “1335” on the label.</p> <p>The protologue of Eugeniopsis angustifolia (Berg 1857 –1859) cites the locality as “Habitat ad ripas in montibus Serra do Caraça, Prov. Minarum” and “campis montium Serra do Lenheiro”. As there is just one gathering, it is not clear why Berg (1857 –1859) cited two localities. It is also not clear from where he took this information, as the localities in the labels are just “Brasilia” (if present). As both localities are part of Sellow’s route (Urban 1906, Herter &amp; Rambo 1953) and within the distribution of M. lenheirensis, it is not possible to precisely infer the type locality.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EEB12ED45A0559FF14F9DCFA0FFE2A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Santos, Matheus F.;Sano, Paulo T.;Lucas, Eve	Santos, Matheus F., Sano, Paulo T., Lucas, Eve (2016): Lectotypifications of some Nineteenth Century names and other nomenclatural updates in Myrcia s. l. (Myrtaceae). Phytotaxa 257 (1): 448-450, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1
03EEB12ED45B055DFF14F88BFF64FB71.text	03EEB12ED45B055DFF14F88BFF64FB71.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Myrcia mutabilis	<div><p>6. Myrcia mutabilis (O. Berg 1857 –1859: 70) N. Silveira (1985b: 88)</p> <p>≡ Aulomyrcia mutabilis O.Berg. Type:— BRAZIL (“Brasilia” on label). No date (fl.), Sellow s.n. (lectotype LE [LE 00007103]! designated here). Figure 7.</p> <p>= Aulomyrcia calyptranthoides O. Berg (1857 –1859: 67). Myrcia calyptranthoides (O.Berg) Mattos (1966: 60), syn. nov. Type:— BRAZIL. Bahia: Jacobina (“Jacobina” on label), 1841 (fl.), Blanchet 3393 (lectotype W [0032593]! designated here, isolectotypes BM!, BR!, C!, F!, G!, K!, LE!, MG!, MICH!, NY!, P!, SP!). Figure 8.</p> <p>= Myrcia pilodes Kiaerskou (1893: 67). Marlierea pilodes (Kiaersk.) Kawasaki (1989: 126). Type:— BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: Serra do Lenheiro (“Brésil (Minas) Serra do Lenheiro” on label), 22 October 1887 (fl.), Glaziou 16976 (lectotype C [C10021651]! designated here, isolectotypes BR!, C [C10021652]!, K!, P!, R!). Figure 9.</p> <p>Aulomyrcia mutabilis:—The material housed at the LE herbarium (Figure 7) is the only Sellow collection of Aulomyrcia mutabilis found. This material matches the protologue and bears Berg’s handwriting (“ Aulomyrcia mutabilis Bg ”); it is appropriate as the lectotype. The locality on the label is vague (“Brasilia”), but the protologue (Berg 1857 –1859) cites “Habitat in montibus Serra do Lenheiro prov. Minas Geraes”. This locality is both congruent with the species distribution and Sellow’s route (Urban 1906, Herter &amp; Rambo 1953); it is here considered the type locality.</p> <p>Aulomyrcia calyptranthoides:—Specimens of Myrcia mutabilis from Bahia state in Brazil are less pilose and have slender structures (particularly the inflorescence) relative to the majority of other material of the species. These characteristics are present in the type of Aulomyrcia calyptranthoides but do not warrant recognition of it as a distinct species. These features are variable while the diagnostic features of M. mutabilis are present in the type of A. calyptranthoides: sympodial branching, cylindrical twigs that are not keeled, leaves with inconspicuous venation on the adaxial surface and turbinate floral buds. For these reasons synonymization of A. calyptranthoides in M. mutabilis is proposed.</p> <p>Berg (1857 –1859) cites the collection Blanchet 3393 housed at the B and W herbaria in the protologue of A. calyptranthoides (“v. in hb. Berol. et Vindob.”). The material at B was destroyed and thus the material at W (Figure 8) is chosen as the lectotype; its label bears Berg’s handwriting (“ Aulomyrcia calyptranthoides Bg ”). The labels in the BR, LE and P herbaria also have Berg’s annotation. The sheet of the isolectotype at K is mixed with a sterile specimen (possibly a Sapotaceae); this may have been a mistake during mounting as it was not seen in the other herbaria.</p> <p>The locality indicated in some labels and in the protologue (“Jacobina”, i.e., municipality of Jacobina, Bahia state) is both part of the species distribution and part of the route of Blanchet or his collaborators (Urban 1906). So, as in the case of Aulomyrcia supraaxillaris, Jacobina is here taken to be the type locality of A. calyptranthoides.</p> <p>Myrcia pilodes:—There are two sheets of Myrcia pilodes in the C herbarium, both with Kiaerskou’s handwriting (“ Myrcia (Aulomyrcia) pilodes ”). The duplicate chosen as the lectotype (Figure 9) is the one illustrated in the protologue. One leaf and a branching diagram are illustrated (Tab. VIII, d and Tab. XII, d, respectively; Kiaerskou 1893); drafts are attached to the sheet. The locality cited on the labels of the type collections at the P and Museu Nacional (R) herbaria (“Serra do Lenheiro”, in Minas Gerais state) agree with the species distribution and this is here considered the type locality.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EEB12ED45B055DFF14F88BFF64FB71	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Santos, Matheus F.;Sano, Paulo T.;Lucas, Eve	Santos, Matheus F., Sano, Paulo T., Lucas, Eve (2016): Lectotypifications of some Nineteenth Century names and other nomenclatural updates in Myrcia s. l. (Myrtaceae). Phytotaxa 257 (1): 448-450, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1
03EEB12ED45F0541FF14FB41FB9FFDD2.text	03EEB12ED45F0541FF14FB41FB9FFDD2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Myrcia nitida Cambessedes 1832	<div><p>7. Myrcia nitida Cambessèdes (1832 –1833: 309)</p> <p>Type:— BRAZIL (“Brasilia” on label). No date (fl.), Saint-Hilaire 33a (lectotype MPU [MPU 010949] [image!] designated here). Figure 10.</p> <p>= Eugenia paniculata Cambessèdes (1832 –1833: 338) nom. illeg. Eugeniopsis paniculata O. Berg (1855 –1856: 82). Marlierea paniculata (O.Berg) D. Legrand (1962: 31), syn. nov. Type:— BRAZIL. Minas Gerais (“Brasilia, In collibus prope Tapanhuacanga” on label), no date (fl.), Saint-Hilaire B1-903 (lectotype MPU [MPU011103] [image!] designated here, isolectotypes F [image!], P!). Figure 11.</p> <p>= Eugenia rubiginosa Cambessèdes (1832 –1833: 338). Eugeniopsis rubiginosa (Cambess.) O. Berg (1855 –1856: 82). Myrciaria? rubiginosa (Cambess.) O. Berg (1857 –1859: 359). Marlierea rubiginosa (Cambess.) D. Legrand (1962: 32), syn. nov. Type:— BRAZIL. Minas Gerais (“Brasilia, In collibus prope Cachoeira” on label), no date (fl.), Saint-Hilaire B1-1101 (lectotype MPU [MPU011092] [image!] designated here, isolectotypes F [image!], P!). Figure 12.</p> <p>Myrcia nitida:—Analysis of the type and other collections show that Myrcia nitida, Eugenia paniculata and Eugenia rubiginosa are synonyms. The three species share a set of distinctive characteristics within clade 7: a mainly monopodial branching pattern, cataphylls presents only at the basal internode and obscure leaf venation (particularly on the adaxial surface). Moreover, morphological variation is low and here not considered sufficient to recognize different species.</p> <p>Only the specimen housed in the MPU Herbaria bears the author’s handwriting identifying the species in the label (Figure 10). For this reason, the material at MPU is here selected as the lectotype. The sheet at P has a different number attached to the type specimen (130) and probably represents another gathering; we consider it and the material at F as syntypes and not as isolectotypes. Neither number (33a and 130) corresponds to any annotation in Saint-Hilaire’s field books (Pignal et al. 2013). The protologue (Cambessèdes 1832 –1833) cites the locality as “In montibus prope vicum Itabira in provincia Minas Geraes” (i.e., near to the municipality of Itabira– Minas Gerais state, Brazil). This locality agrees with the species distribution and with Saint-Hilaire’s route (Urban 1906); it is here considered to be the type locality.</p> <p>Eugenia paniculata:— Eugenia paniculata was previously considered a synonym of Marlierea eugenioides (Cambessèdes 1832 –1833: 302) D. Legrand (1958: 256) (Govaerts et al. 2015, Sobral et al. 2015). However, M. eugenioides has morphological characteristics associated with clade 2 of Lucas et al. (2011) and examination of the type material showed Eugenia paniculata to be part of clade 7.</p> <p>Again, only the specimen housed in the MPU Herbaria bears the author’s handwriting and, for this reason, is selected as the lectotype (Figure 11). The protologue of Eugenia paniculata (Cambessèdes 1832 –1833) cites the locality as “In collibus prope vicum Tapanhuacanga in provincia Minas Geraes” (i.e., the region of the municipality of Sabará, Minas Gerais state, Brazil). This locality matches the species distribution and Saint-Hilaire’s route (Urban 1906); it is here considered to be the type locality.</p> <p>Eugenia rubiginosa:—As in the two previous cases, the specimen at MPU is selected as the lectotype because it bears the author’s handwriting (Figure 12). The protologue of Eugenia rubiginosa (Cambessèdes 1832 –1833) cites the locality as “In collibus prope praedium Cachoeira in parte orientali provinciae Minas Geraes”. It was not possible to locate this place within Minas Gerais so the precise type locality remains unclear.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EEB12ED45F0541FF14FB41FB9FFDD2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Santos, Matheus F.;Sano, Paulo T.;Lucas, Eve	Santos, Matheus F., Sano, Paulo T., Lucas, Eve (2016): Lectotypifications of some Nineteenth Century names and other nomenclatural updates in Myrcia s. l. (Myrtaceae). Phytotaxa 257 (1): 448-450, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1
03EEB12ED4430541FF14FD20FB3CFA82.text	03EEB12ED4430541FF14FD20FB3CFA82.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Myrcia plusiantha Kiaerskou 1893	<div><p>8. Myrcia plusiantha Kiaerskou (1893: 66)</p> <p>Type:— BRAZIL. Rio de Janeiro [“Brésil (Rio Jan.) Alto Macahé” on label], 5 March 1888 (fl.), Glaziou 16994 (lectotype C [C 10015882]! designated here, isolectotypes BR!, C [C 10015883]!, F!, G!, K!, LE!, NY!, P!, R!, RB!). Figure 13.</p> <p>= Myrcia follii G.M. Barroso &amp; Peixoto (1990: 4), syn. nov. Type:— BRAZIL. Espírito Santo: Mun. Linhares, Reserva florestal da CVRD, Est. Farinha Seca, ant. 221, km 4.140 lado direito, 23 November 1988 (fl.), Folli 821 (holotype CVRD!, isotypes RB!, SPF!)</p> <p>Myrcia plusiantha:— Kiaerskou (1893) cites the collection Glaziou 1694 in the protologue of Myrcia plusiantha, a typographic error. At the C herbarium, where Kiaerskou worked, the two duplicates of Glaziou 16994 bear the author’s handwriting (“ Myrcia (Aulomyrcia) plusiantha ”). The material illustrated in the protologue (one leaf, Tab. X, a, b; Kiaerskou 1893) is selected as the lectotype (Figure 13); the draft of the illustration is attached to this sheet. The locality cited in some labels of the type collection (“Alto Macahé”, i.e., the region of Macaé de Cima, in the municipality of Nova Friburgo, Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil) agrees with the species distribution and is here considered the type locality.</p> <p>Myrcia follii:—The type collection of Myrcia follii and other specimens from the region of Linhares (Espírito Santo state, Brazil), despite denser indument and less reticulate venation, do not show significant differences from collections of Myrcia plusiantha. Furthermore, both species share a set of diagnostic characteristics within the clade: sympodial branching, larger leaves than average in clade 7, cataphylls present at all internodes, twigs not keeled and turbinate floral buds. For these reasons, M. follii is here reduced to a synonym of M. plusiantha.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EEB12ED4430541FF14FD20FB3CFA82	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Santos, Matheus F.;Sano, Paulo T.;Lucas, Eve	Santos, Matheus F., Sano, Paulo T., Lucas, Eve (2016): Lectotypifications of some Nineteenth Century names and other nomenclatural updates in Myrcia s. l. (Myrtaceae). Phytotaxa 257 (1): 448-450, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1
03EEB12ED4430545FF14FAD0FE42FE62.text	03EEB12ED4430545FF14FAD0FE42FE62.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Myrcia subavenia	<div><p>9. Myrcia subavenia (O. Berg 1857 –1859: 69) N. Silveira (1985a: 66)</p> <p>≡ Aulomyrcia subavenia O.Berg. Type:— BRAZIL (“Brasilia” on label). No date (fl.), Sellow s.n. (lectotype LE! designated by Sobral et al. 2010, isolectotype K!). Figure 14.</p> <p>= Aulomyrcia ferruginea O. Berg (1857 –1859: 552). Myrcia lapensis N. Silveira (1985a: 67). Type:— BRAZIL. Minas Gerais (“ad ripas rivul. S. da Lapa” on label), November 1824 (fl.), Riedel 972 (lectotype LE [LE00007061]! designated here). Figure 15.</p> <p>Aulomyrcia subavenia:— Sobral et al. (2010) designated the lectotype of Aulomyrcia subavenia mentioning the material Sellow 1041 at the LE herbarium (Figure 14). This number, as stated before, is not Sellow’s collection number and the lectotype is cited here as Sellow s.n.</p> <p>Berg (1857 –1859) cites in the protologue of Aulomyrcia subavenia, the locality “Habitat ad ripas prope Timbopeva in prov. S. Pauli”. However, A. subavenia has not been reported from São Paulo state (=“prov. S. Pauli”) or from any area close to the state boundary. The locality on the type collection label is vague (“Brasilia”). The erroneous locality is here assumed to be a mistake of the author and the locality of the type collection remains unclear.</p> <p>Aulomyrcia ferruginea:— Berg (1857 –1859) cites material of the LE herbarium in the protologue of Aulomyrcia ferruginea (“hb. Hort. Bot. Petrop.”). Three sheets of Riedel’s collection of A. ferruginea were found at LE. Two of them (barcodes LE00007061 and LE00007062) bear Berg’s handwriting (“ Aulomyrcia ferruginea Bg. ”) and the same number (“972”). Both specimens were collected in the same area (Serra da Lapa), but they appear to represent different gatherings as Riedel’s labels each have different data. These specimens are here considered syntypes; the most complete is designated as the lectotype of A. ferruginea (Figure 15). The last specimen (barcode LE00007044) is from the same region but does not bear the same number as the other sheet. There is no evidence that this material was seen by Berg as his handwriting is not on the label; this specimen is therefore not considered part of the type gathering.</p> <p>There is a Riedel collection at P herbarium that does not bear Berg’s handwriting but is identified as A. ferruginea and there is an indication that it was analysed by Berg (“Teste Berg”); this is here taken as evidence that the specimen is part of the type gathering. The label of the P specimen does not have any information indicating which material at LE is its duplicate, but the morphology (especially the young leaves) led us to deduce that it is a duplicate of the specimen LE00007062 at LE herbarium. Thus, we consider it as a remaining syntype and not as an isolectotype.</p> <p>The locality on the labels of the type collection (“Serra da Lapa”) and in the protologue (Berg 1857 –1859, “Habitat ad ripas rivulorum in montibus Serra da Lapa prov. Minarum”) corresponds to the current region of the Serra do Cipó (Minas Gerais state, Brazil). This locality matches the species distribution and Riedel’s route (Urban 1906) and is here taken to be the type locality.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EEB12ED4430545FF14FAD0FE42FE62	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Santos, Matheus F.;Sano, Paulo T.;Lucas, Eve	Santos, Matheus F., Sano, Paulo T., Lucas, Eve (2016): Lectotypifications of some Nineteenth Century names and other nomenclatural updates in Myrcia s. l. (Myrtaceae). Phytotaxa 257 (1): 448-450, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1
03EEB12ED447054CFF14FDB0FB2EFAAE.text	03EEB12ED447054CFF14FDB0FB2EFAAE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Myrcia subcordata De Candolle 1828	<div><p>10. Myrcia subcordata De Candolle (1828: 253)</p> <p>≡ Aulomyrcia subcordata (DC.) O. Berg (1855 –1856: 62). Type:— BRAZIL. Minas Gerais (“Habitat in provinciae Minarum” on label), no date (fr.), Martius s.n. (lectotype M! designated here, isolectotype G-DC!). Figure 16.</p> <p>= Calyptranthes cordata O. Berg (1857 –1859: 48). Chytraculia cordata (O.Berg) Kuntze (1891: 238). Type:— BRAZIL (“Brasilia” on label). No date (fr.), Sellow s.n. (lectotype LE! designated here). Figure 17.</p> <p>= Aulomyrcia breviramis O. Berg (1857 –1859: 66). Myrcia breviramis (O.Berg) D. Legrand (1961: 294), syn. nov. Type:— BRAZIL (“Brasilia” on label). No date (fl.), Sellow s.n. (lectotype LE [LE00007032]! designated here, isolectotypes BR!, K!, P!). Figure 18.</p> <p>= Aulomyrcia pulchra O. Berg (1857 –1859: 68). Myrcia pulchra (O.Berg) Kiaerskou (1893: 65), syn. nov. Type:— BRAZIL (“Brasilia” on label). No date (fl.), Sellow s.n. (lectotype K [K000344081]! designated here, isolectotypes BR!, LE!). Figure 19.</p> <p>= Aulomyrcia widgreniana O. Berg (1857 –1859: 70). Myrcia widgreniana (O.Berg) Mattos (1968: 161), syn. nov. Type:— BRAZIL. Minas Gerais, 1845 (fl.), Widgren 545 (lectotype S [S05-2550]! designated here, isolectotypes S [S13-18121]!, SP!). Figure 20.</p> <p>= Myrcia pilotantha Kiaerskou (1893: 64), syn. nov. Type:— BRAZIL. Rio de Janeiro: Mun. Petrópolis [“Brésil (Rio Jan.) Morro do Retiro, Petrópolis” on label], 20 January 1883 (fl.), Glaziou 13881 (lectotype C [C10015880]! designated here, isolectotypes BR!, F!, G!, IAN!, K!, LE!, P!, R!). Figure 21.</p> <p>= Myrcia jaguariaivensis Mattos &amp; D. Legrand (1975: 2), syn. nov. Type:— Brazil. Paraná: Mun. Jaguariaíva, Fazenda Chapada Santo Antônio, 26 November 1968 (fl.), Hatschbach 20387 (holotype MVM [image!], isotypes G!, MBM!, MO!, MU [image!], NY!, UEC!).</p> <p>Myrcia subcordata:—The typical morphology of Myrcia subcordata is found almost exclusively in specimens from the Quadrilátero Ferrífero region (Minas Gerais state) but also in some specimens from the Serra do Caparaó and São Tomé das Letras (also in Minas Gerais), always from above 1,300 m elevation. These specimens have subsessile leaves and ovate to largely ovate leaf blades with cordate bases, usually with thicker structures and greater pilosity. However, analysis of multiple collections indicates a continuous gradient between this morphology and that of many specimens usually assigned to Myrcia pulchra. In addition, both species share a set of distinctive characters within clade 7: sympodial branching, cataphylls at all internodes, young twigs that exfoliate and are not keeled, conspicuous reticulate venation on both leaf surfaces and turbinate floral buds. For these reasons the names are here considered synonymous and M. subcordata is the oldest and therefore accepted name despite its unfortunate reference to the uncommon cordate leaf morphology. While Calyptranthes cordata has been treated as a synonym of M. subcordata, other names synonymised here have been considered synonyms of M. pulchra (Govaerts et al. 2015).</p> <p>The protologue of M. subcordata cites material seen in Martius’ herbarium (“v. s. in h. Mart.”). As mentioned above, Martius’s Brazilian collections are mainly deposited at the M herbarium. Martius’ specimen of M. subcordata at M includes De Candolle’s annotation (“ Myrcia subcordata prod”). The G-DC herbarium also has a specimen of M. subcordata collected by Martius. As in the case of Calyptranthes densa (see above), this is a very poor specimen (a single leaf, a piece of the infrutescence and some loose fruits) and was probably removed from the collection at M. This material also bears the De Candolle’s handwriting in the label (“ Myrcia subcordata DC. ”). Again, as both specimens were analysed by the species author, the material at M (Figure 16) was selected as the lectotype of M. subcordata because it is the most complete.</p> <p>A photo of the type collection of M. subcordata at the NY herbarium indicates that it is from B when in fact it is an image of the specimen at M. Regarding the type locality, the specimen at M bears “habitat in Minarum” on the label. This refers to Minas Gerais state; a very large area to designate as the type locality. This locality does at least agree with the morphology of typical specimens, from the Quadrilátero Ferrífero region.</p> <p>Calyptranthes cordata:—The specimen at the LE herbarium (Figure 17) is the only Sellow collection of Calyptranthes cordata located in the visited herbaria. The specimen morphology matches the protologue and bears the author’s handwriting on the label (“ Calyptranthes cordata Bg ”); it is here selected as the lectotype. While the locality on the label is vague (“Brasilia”), the protologue cites “Habitat in prov. S. Pauli”. No specimen matching the type morphology has been found in São Paulo state and, as in the case of Aulomyrcia subavenia, an erroneous locality appears to be a mistake of the species’ author.</p> <p>Aulomyrcia breviramis:—As in the previous case, Sellow material at the LE herbarium (Figure 18) is designated as lectotype; the selected specimen bears the author’s handwriting (“ Aulomyrcia breviramis Bg. ”), matches the protologue and is representative of the species morphology. Duplicate collections in the BR, K and P herbaria also bear Berg’s annotation. Some collections show the number “4809” (K and LE).As in the case of Aulomyrcia pulchra, the localities in the labels (“Brasilia”, if present) and in the protologue (“Habitat in fruticetis ripariis prov. S. Pauli”) are vague.</p> <p>Aulomyrcia pulchra:— A Sellow sheet at the K herbarium (Figure 19) is designated as lectotype as it bears the author’s handwriting (“ Aulomyrcia pulchra Bg. ”); this specimen matches the protologue and is representative of the species morphology. All type specimens bear Berg’s annotation and the number “5129”. Locality references in the labels (“Brasilia”, if present) and in the protologue (“Habitat in prov. S. Pauli”) are vague, but agree with the species distribution and Sellow’s route (Herter &amp; Rambo 1953).</p> <p>Aulomyrcia widgreniana:—The protologue of Aulomyrcia widgreniana (Berg 1857 –1859) cites the collection Widgren 545 and “v. in hb. Sonder”. Part of the collection of Otto W. Sonder was sold to the herbarium of the Swedish Museum of Natural History (S) (Stafleu &amp; Cowan 1985). For this reason, a specimen from S (the most complete; figure 20) was chosen as the lectotype of A. widgreniana. The locality in the specimen labels (“ Minas Gerais ”) is vague, but information is congruent with the species distribution and Widgren’s route in Brazil (Urban 1906).</p> <p>Myrcia pilotantha:— Kiaerskou (1893) cites two Glaziou collections in the protologue of M. pilotantha (Glaziou 13881, 16991). Both collections were found in the C herbarium and bear the author’s annotation (“ Myrcia (Aulomyrcia) pilotantha ”). Glaziou 13881 (Figure 21) is more appropriate as lectotype as it better matches the species morphology described in the protologue. Both collections were illustrated in the protologue (Kiaerskou 1893): a leaf of Glaziou 13881 (Tab. IX, c) and a twig of Glaziou 16991 (Tab. IX, b)—the drafts are attached to the specimens. A duplicate of Glaziou 16991 was seen at P.</p> <p>The localities cited in the labels of the specimens at P (“ Morro do Retiro, Petrópolis ”— Glaziou 13881, and “ Alto Macahé ”— Glaziou 16991) are congruent with the species distribution and Glaziou’s route (Urban 1906); these are considered to be the type localities.</p> <p>Myrcia jaguariaivensis:—We agreed with the previous synonymization of Myrcia jaguariaivensis in Myrcia pulchra (Govaerts et al. 2008) and it is also considered here a synonym of Myrcia subcordata.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EEB12ED447054CFF14FDB0FB2EFAAE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Santos, Matheus F.;Sano, Paulo T.;Lucas, Eve	Santos, Matheus F., Sano, Paulo T., Lucas, Eve (2016): Lectotypifications of some Nineteenth Century names and other nomenclatural updates in Myrcia s. l. (Myrtaceae). Phytotaxa 257 (1): 448-450, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1
03EEB12ED44E054DFF14FAFCFD9EFEF2.text	03EEB12ED44E054DFF14FAFCFD9EFEF2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Myrcia summa (McVaugh 1958) M. F. Santos 2016	<div><p>11. Myrcia summa (McVaugh 1958: 89) M.F.Santos, comb. nov.</p> <p>≡ Marlierea summa McVaugh. Type:— VENEZUELA. Amazonas: Cerro Sipapo (Paráque), 26–28 January 1949 (fl.), Maguire 28644 (holotype MICH!, isotypes NY!, S!, US! VEN [image!])</p> <p>= Marlierea summa var. superior McVaugh (1958: 91). Type:— VENEZUELA. Ilu-Tepui, Gran Sabana, 14 March 1952 (fl.), Maguire 33405 (holotype MICH!, isotype NY!)</p> <p>= Marlierea summa var. calva McVaugh (1969: 69). Type:— VENEZUELA. Bolívar: Chimantá Massif, 5 February 1955 (fl.), Steyermark 493 (holotype MICH!, isotypes F!, NY!, S!, US!)</p> <p>= Marlierea vicina McVaugh (1969: 70), syn. nov. Type:— GUIANA. Upper Mazaruni River Basin. Mt. Ayanganna, 7 August 1960 (fl.), Tillett 45172 (holotype MICH!, isotypes COL [image!], F!, NY!, S!, US!, VEN [image!])</p> <p>As stated above, in light of evidence from recent phylogenetic studies in Myrcia s.l. (Lucas et al. 2011, Santos 2014), synonymization of Marlierea species in Myrcia is desirable. Furthermore, Myrcia summa has free calyx lobes and the hypanthium does not tear during anthesis, characteristics that do not match the typical ones found in Marlierea. The synonymization of Marlierea summa var. superior and Marlierea summa var. calva in Marlierea summa was previously proposed by Govaerts et al. (2008).</p> <p>In the protologue of Marlierea vicina, McVaugh (1969: 70) highlighted morphological similarity with Marlierea summa: “(...) this plant resembles Marlierea summa, and perhaps a case could be made for considering it merely a well-marked variety of that species (...)”. The author described the species judging that it is the best option until more collections are analysed. More collections have been analysed for this study, including specimens from the type locality of M. vicina. Characteristics cited by McVaugh (1969) as distinctive of M. vicina relative to Myrcia summa (longer, darker, apressed trichomes, adaxial surface of leaves not foveolate, inflorescence with less flowers, flowers bigger and tetramerous) are variable in analysed specimens. Additionally, the species share a set of distinctive characteristics within clade 7: sympodial vegetative branching and at the base of the inflorescences, and inconspicuous venation on the adaxial leaf surfaces. It is therefore not possible to recognize M. vicina as a distinct taxon and the species is synonymized under Myrcia summa.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EEB12ED44E054DFF14FAFCFD9EFEF2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Santos, Matheus F.;Sano, Paulo T.;Lucas, Eve	Santos, Matheus F., Sano, Paulo T., Lucas, Eve (2016): Lectotypifications of some Nineteenth Century names and other nomenclatural updates in Myrcia s. l. (Myrtaceae). Phytotaxa 257 (1): 448-450, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1
03EEB12ED44C054EFF14FF18FA10FCFA.text	03EEB12ED44C054EFF14FF18FA10FCFA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Myrcia tenuifolia	<div><p>12. Myrcia tenuifolia (O. Berg 1857 –1859: 67) Sobral (2006: 136)</p> <p>≡ Aulomyrcia tenuifolia O.Berg. Type:— BRAZIL. Bahia (“ Bahia. Ilheos” on label), 1835 (fl.), Blanchet 2321 (holotype HAL [89806] [image!], isotypes BM!, F!, G!, K!, LE!, MICH!, NY!, P!, W!). Figure 22.</p> <p>The protologue of Aulomyrcia tenuifolia (Berg 1857 –1859) cites Blanchet 2321 in the herbarium of Schlechtendal (“v. in hb. Schlechtend.”). Currently, the Schlechtendal herbarium is housed at the HAL herbarium (Stafleu &amp; Cowan 1985) where this collection bears Berg’s annotation (“ Aulomyrcia tenuifolia Bg ”), as does the duplicate at LE. However, Berg only visited the LE herbarium while preparing the supplement to Flora Brasiliensis (published in 1859), well after description of A. tenuifolia in volume 14 of Flora Brasiliensis (published in 1857). The duplicate at HAL (Figure 22) therefore is the only one to have been seen by Berg for the description of A. tenuifolia. It is therefore considered the holotype as proposed by Sobral (2006).</p> <p>The type locality (“Ilheos”, i.e., the municipality of Ilhéus, Bahia state) is indicated on some specimen labels (G and K herbaria). This region is part of the species distribution and also corresponds to the areas visited by Blanchet or his collaborators (Urban 1906); the vicinity of Ilhéus is here considered the type locality of the species. Berg (1857 –1859) cites in the protologue “Habitat in prov. Bahiensis” and “Pl. Hamadryas” (i.e., Hamadryades sensu Martius 1824). Hamadryades is equivalent to the Caatinga domain, where the species does not occur; the term Dryades (Martius 1840) is the equivalent to the Atlantic Forest, where the species occurs. Again, it is believed that this discrepancy regarding the type locality is the author’s error, as in the cases of Aulomyrcia subavenia and Calyptranthes cordata.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EEB12ED44C054EFF14FF18FA10FCFA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Santos, Matheus F.;Sano, Paulo T.;Lucas, Eve	Santos, Matheus F., Sano, Paulo T., Lucas, Eve (2016): Lectotypifications of some Nineteenth Century names and other nomenclatural updates in Myrcia s. l. (Myrtaceae). Phytotaxa 257 (1): 448-450, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.257.1.1
