identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03EDE927D83F8B40C032FA195BA8FF5B.text	03EDE927D83F8B40C032FA195BA8FF5B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Odontocorynus	<div><p>Key to the species of Odontocorynus</p><p>Males: antenna modified, club often with basal process, distal desmomeres often lamellate or at least asymmetrically setose; venter of middle and hind femora often with erect scales and setae; first ventrite slightly depressed or with fascicle of erect setae................................................... 1</p><p>Females: antenna unmodified AND venter of middle and hind femora with scales appressed; first ventrite convex.......................................... 16</p><p>MALES</p><p>1. Pronotum with tubercle at anterolateral margin (Fig. 1).................... 2</p><p>- Pronotum with anterolateral margin simple (Fig. 2)......................... 7</p><p>2. Prosternum simple; elytra and pronotum vittate, odd interstriae with inconspicuous brown scales (Fig. 20)............ O. luteogramma new species</p><p>- Prosternum channeled, lateral margin of channel carinate at least in anterior portion; elytra not distinctly vittate............................................ 3</p><p>3. Ventrite 1 with fascicle of setae; Mexico ...................................... 4</p><p>- Ventrite 1 without fascicle of setae; Mexico and elsewhere.................. 5</p><p>4. Tarsi reddish; fore leg with tarsomeres 1 and 2 with lateral fringe of long, yellow setae on inner edge; hind leg with tarsomere 3 with usual suite of setae; interstriae with setae uniform and inconspicuous....... O. creperus Boheman</p><p>- Tarsi dark; fore leg with tarsomeres 1–3 with usual suite of setae; hind leg with tarsomere 3 with tuft of long, specialized setae on inner edge; interstriae with setae approximately 2X longer than width of interstriae, erect; interstriae 1, 5, and 7 subvittate.......................... O. subvittatus Casey</p><p>5. Scape lamellate and usually flexed near middle (Fig. 10); club short, barely longer than wide; Mexico .............................. O. latiscapus Champion</p><p>- Scape not flexed near middle; club elongate, 2X longer than wide......... 6</p><p>6. Club as long as width of eye; scape lamellate and widened gradually; Mexico .................................................. O. procerus new species</p><p>- Club shorter than width of eye; scape clavate; eastern and central United States ......................................................... O. falsus (LeConte)</p><p>7. Dorsal vestiture inconspicuous except for continuous line of yellowish scales on elytral suture and scutellum (occasionally extended to pronotum); Mexico ................................................. O. suturaflava Champion</p><p>- Dorsal vestiture of conspicuous, light colored scales, scales of elytral suture and intervals subequal.......................................................... 8</p><p>8. Desmomere 3 modified, distending to desmomere 5 (Fig. 8); dorsal vestiture of slender ochreous scales intermixed with broad white scales (Fig. 21); Mexico ................................................... O. nunume new species</p><p>- Desmomere 3 unmodified; dorsal vestiture homogeneous (except for scutellum); Mexico and elsewhere.............................................. 9</p><p>9. Striae with scales similar to those of interstriae; central United States, Minnesota to Texas ................................... O. pulverulentus (Casey)</p><p>- Striae with very fine hairs; other distribution................................ 10</p><p>10. Scape widened in distal one-third (Fig. 11) or clavate; basomere of club not or barely excised, with or without inconspicuous process (Figs. 5–6)...... 11</p><p>- Scape gradually widened from middle or before (Figs. 12–14); basomere of club excised and with distinct conical to lamellate process (Fig. 7)........ 13</p><p>11. Body more elongate and with vestiture crowded on elytral disk and basal lobe of pronotum (similar to Fig. 21); Arizona to Durango ..... O. townsendi (Casey)</p><p>- Body stout (as in Fig. 2); vestiture homogeneous; other distribution...... 12</p><p>12. Rostrum curved strongly at base; dorsal vestiture with scales ovate, approximately 3X longer than wide; pronotal punctures little wider than</p><p>248 striae; scutellum with scales imbricate; United States and Canada ....................................................................... O. salebrosus (Casey)</p><p>- Rostrum curved rather evenly; dorsal vestiture with scales setiform, approximately 5X longer than wide; pronotal punctures often much wider than striae; scutellum with scales rather sparse, not imbricate; Mexico to Costa Rica ................................................. O. tectus (Champion)</p><p>13. Body elongate (as in Fig. 21); elytral apices rounded narrowly, pygidium nearly completely covered; dorsal vestiture of setiform scales, hirsute; Mexico ...................................................... O. histriculus Casey</p><p>- Body stout (as in Fig. 2); elytral apices round leaving apex of pygidium uncovered; dorsal vestiture of ovate, appressed scales; United States and immediately adjacent areas of Canada and Mexico ......................... 14</p><p>14. Antennal insertion at 0.33–0.37X length of rostrum; desmomere 1 generally much longer than 2 (Fig. 24); venter of hind tibia often with blunt tooth near base of corbel (Fig. 4); apex of aedeagus pointed (Fig. 31); coast from North Carolina to Alabama, southeastern part of Great Plains (Fig. 33).................................................................... O. calcarifer new species</p><p>- Antennal insertion at 0.25–0.32X length of rostrum; desmomere 1 at most 1.5X longer than 2; venter of hind tibia without tooth near base of corbel; apex of aedeagus blunt (Fig. 32); other distribution........................ 15</p><p>15. Rostrum curved strongly at base, distal portion almost straight (Fig. 23); vestiture inconspicuous; eastern and central North America............................................................................ O. umbellae (Fabricius)</p><p>- Rostrum with distal portion curved over point of antennal insertion (Fig. 26); vestiture relatively dense and visible without magnification (except for very small specimens); Florida and adjacent shore of Alabama (Fig. 35), supposedly Mexico ...................................... O. larvatus (Boheman)</p><p>FEMALES</p><p>16. Prosternum channeled, lateral margin of channel carinate at least in apical portion.......................................................................... 17</p><p>- Prosternum simple ( O. suturaflava sometimes with indistinct ridge at apical constriction)..................................................................... 21</p><p>17. Found in eastern and central United States ............... O. falsus (LeConte)</p><p>- Found in Mexico [The females of the four species that key out here are difficult to distinguish and may require direct comparison with reliably identified specimens.]........................................................... 18</p><p>18. Interstriae with setae approximately 2X longer than width of interstriae, erect; interstriae 1, 5, and 7 subvittate [inferred from male; females unknown]................................................... O. subvittatus Casey</p><p>- Interstriae with setae appressed when elongate; elytral vestiture homogeneous............................................................................ 19</p><p>19. Pronotum with punctures well-separated, intervals shiny; desmomeres 1 and 2 subequal in length......................................... O. creperus Boheman</p><p>- Pronotum with punctures crowded, intervals narrow and often longitudinally confluent; desmomere 1 twice as long as 2................................... 20</p><p>20. Vestiture erect, scales narrowed apically and usually yellow............................................................................ O. latiscapus Champion</p><p>- Vestiture rather appressed, scales blunt apically and white.............................................................................. O. procerus new species</p><p>21. Elytra conspicuously vittate, at least one interstria differently colored; Mexico .......................................................................... 22</p><p>- Elytral vestiture homogeneous or, if consisting of differently colored scales, then not vittate; Mexico and elsewhere....................................... 23</p><p>22. Elytral suture and scutellum (occasionally extended to pronotum) with continuous line of yellowish scales................. O. suturaflava (Champion)</p><p>- Even elytral interstriae with yellowish white scales, odd interstriae with inconspicuous brown scales (Fig. 20)............ O. luteogramma new species</p><p>23. Dorsal vestiture of ochreous to brown slender scales intermixed with broad white scales, white scales concentrated in interstriae 3–7 (Fig. 21); Mexico ............................................................. O. nunume new species</p><p>- Dorsal vestiture unicolored (except for scutellum).......................... 24</p><p>24. Hind tibia with outer apical angle prolonged into blunt lobe; central Mexico ...................................................... O. histriculus Casey</p><p>- Hind tibia with outer apical angle not noticeably protruding; other distribution...................................................................... 25</p><p>25. Body more elongate; vestiture crowded on elytral disk and basal lobe of pronotum (similar to Fig. 21); Arizona to Durango ... O. townsendi (Casey)</p><p>- Body stout; vestiture usually homogeneous; distribution elsewhere........ 26</p><p>26. Pronotal punctures coarse, usually wider than interstriae; pronotum with greatest width near base; dorsal vestiture semi-erect; central Mexico to Costa Rica ......................................................... O. tectus (Champion)</p><p>- Pronotal punctures approximately as wide as interstriae; pronotum with greatest width near middle; dorsal vestiture appressed; U.S.A. and Canada ................................................................................... 27</p><p>27. Striae with scales similar to those of interstriae, dorsal vestiture appearing homogeneous; central United States, Minnesota to Texas .............................................................................. O. pulverulentus (Casey)</p><p>- Striae with very fine hairs, dorsal vestiture inconspicuous or appearing striped; other distribution...................................................... 28</p><p>28. Sides of rostrum coarsely punctate and subcostate, matte (Fig. 27); antenna inserted near apical third of rostrum; middle tibia with distinct, others with small subapical tooth proximad of usual apical tooth (Fig. 3).......................................................................... O. umbellae (Fabricius)</p><p>- Sides of rostrum finely punctate, glabrous (Figs. 28–30); antenna inserted near middle of rostrum (further apicad in O. larvatus); tibiae without additional subapical tooth..................................................... 29</p><p>29. Scape slender, subcylindrical, apex clavate and (in dorsal view) approximately of same width as apex of desmomere 1 (Fig. 15); widely distributed in eastern and central North America.............................. O. salebrosus (Casey)</p><p>- Scape more-or-less compressed, apex wider than apex of desmomere 1 (Figs. 16–17); southern and southeastern United States, possibly Mexico .. ................................................................................... 30</p><p>30. Rostrum curved rather evenly (Fig. 30); sides of rostrum usually with punctures obsolete in anterior half; desmomeres 1 and 2 subequal in length; Florida and adjacent shore of Alabama (Fig. 35), supposedly Mexico .................................................................. O. larvatus (Boheman)</p><p>- Rostrum curved strongly at base, apical portion curved less (Fig. 28); sides of rostrum with punctures distinct in anterior half; desmomere 1 distinctly longer than 2; coast from North Carolina to Alabama, southeastern part of Great Plains (Fig. 33)................................. O. calcarifer new species 250</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EDE927D83F8B40C032FA195BA8FF5B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Prena, Jens	Prena, Jens (2008): Review ofOdontocorynusSchönherr (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Baridinae) with Descriptions of Four New Species. The Coleopterists Bulletin 62 (2): 243-277, DOI: 10.1649/1074.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1649/1074.1
03EDE927D8328B43C027FF6659C9FBFF.text	03EDE927D8328B43C027FF6659C9FBFF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Odontocorynus calcarifer Prena new 2008	<div><p>Odontocorynus calcarifer Prena, new species</p><p>(Figs. 4, 13, 17, 19, 24, 28, 31, 33)</p><p>Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘New Havover/ NC [North Carolina] VIII-17-44/ Mallia’’, ‘‘On Helenium / nuttallii/ flower/ 44-23092’’, ‘‘ Odontocorynus / sp./ LLB ’44’’, ‘‘TYPUS/ Odontocorynus / calcarifer Prena / Prena design. 2007’’ (USNM).</p><p>Paratypes 86 males, 114 females; ALABAMA: Mobile Co., H.P. Loding (USNM 1) . ARKANSAS: Franklin Co., 0.5 mi S Vesta, 2.6.2001, E.G. Riley (TAMU 2) ; Franklin Co., Cherokee Prairie, 2 mi N Charleston, 2- 3.6.2001, E.G. Riley (TAMU 1) . FLORIDA: Lake Co., Mt. Plymouth, 15.7.1969, R. Gordon (MNHUB 2, USNM 12) ; Sanford, 3.10.1924, W.H. White (USNM 4) , Sanford, 3.10.1925, W.H. White (USNM 9) ; Jefferson Co., 22.9.1925, C.O. Handley (USNM 1); Arcadia, 11.2.1919 (USNM 1) ; Highland Co., 3 mi E jct. Kissimmee rd. &amp; St. Rt. 70, 27.6.1963, D.G. Kissinger, sweeping vegetation (USNM 1) ; Miami, 6.8.1932, E.C. Zimmerman, 1941 (USNM 1) ; Franklin Co., St. George Island, 20– 23.5.1986, H. &amp; A. Howden (CMNC 1) ; Highland Co., Archbold Bio. Sta., 25.9.1978, N.M. Downie (CWOB 3) , Highland Co., Archbold Bio. Sta., 27.9.1978, N.M. Downie (CWOB 1) ; Jefferson Co., 1 mi S. Wacissa, 3.7.1973, R. D. Kaplan (CWOB 1) ; S. Rosa Co., Blackwater R. St. For., 1.6 mi SW Riley’s Ck., 29.7.1972, C.W. O’Brien (CWOB 2) ; Lake Co., Hwy 27, 5 mi S Leesburg, 30.6.1980, C.W. O’Brien &amp; G.J. Wibmer (CWOB 1) . GEORGIA: St. Simons Island, 22.8.1944, in wild Morning Glory flowers, 44-21685 (USNM 2) ; St. Simons Island, 22.8.1944, Mayer, in Croton leaf, 44-21988 (USNM 1) . MISSOURI: Henry Co., Deepwater, County Line Prairie, 2.7.1977, M.E. Rice (CWOB 1) ; Vernon Co., Wilson Tract, 4 mi. W Montevallo, E.G. Riley, 20.6.1979 (CWOB 9, JPPC 6) ; St. Clair Co., Taberville Prairie, 1.5 mi E Appleton, 20.6.1979, E.G. Riley (CWOB 1) . NORTH CAROLINA: New Havover, 17.8.1944, Mallia, on Helenium nuttallii flower, 44-23092 (USNM 1) ; Pender Co., New Topsail Beach, 1.9.1963, P.D. Ashlock (CWOB 1) ; Onslow Co., N end Topsail Island, 2.9.1963, P.D. Ashlock (CWOB 2) . OKLAHOMA: Ardmore I. T., 12.7., C. R. Jones (USNM 3) , Ardmore I. T., 1.6., C. R. Jones (USNM 2) ; Ardmore I. T., 26.2.1905, C. R. Jones (USNM 4); Ardmore, 1.6.1909, F.C. Bishopp, Mesadenia tuberosa (USNM 2) ; Tulsa, 5.6.1909, W.D. Pierce, Asclepias sp. (USNM 2) ; Tulsa, 25.6.1909, W.D. Pierce, on Rudbeckia hirta (USNM 12) , Tulsa, 25.6.1909, W.D. Pierce, on Solanum elaeagnifolium (USNM 7) , Tulsa, 25.6.1909, W.D. Pierce, on Solanum torreyi bud (USNM 2) , Tulsa, 25.6.1909, W.D. Pierce, on Anogra pallida (USNM 1) ; Muskogee, 6.26.09, W.D. Pierce (USNM 2) ; Hugo I. T., 20.6.1907, F.C. Bishopp, Monarda citriodora (USNM 2) , Hugo I. T., 20.6.1907, F.C. Bishopp, in cott[o]n f[ie]ld (USNM 1) ; Okmulgee, 24.6.1909, W.D. Pierce, Rudbeckia hirta (USNM 1) ; Lawton, 8.6.1909, on Parosela (USNM 1) ; Latimer Co., VI /1984, K. Stephan (TAMU 1); Latimer Co., V /1985, K. Stephan (TAMU 1) . SOUTH CAROLINA: Pawleys Beach, 11.9.1944, Gordon, on Croton argyranthemus foliage, 44-23863 (USNM 4) , Pawleys Beach, 11.9.1944, Gordon, on Andropogon glomeratus foliage, 44-25423 (USNM 2) ; Pawleys Beach 11.9.1944, Mallia, on Compositae flower head, 44- 25421 (USNM 1) ; Isle of Palms, 3.8.1944, Mallia, on Crepe myrtle flower, 44- 19988 (USNM 2) ; Isle of Palms, 8.8.1949, W.F. Chamberlain (TAMU 1) , Hilton Head Island, 20.7.1965, A. T. Howden (CNCI 1) ; Huntington Beach SP, 18.8.1991, on Heterotheca (JCCC 6) . TEXAS: College Station, Kitty’s, 7.8.1981, ex Helenium (JPPC 4, TAMU 67) .</p><p>252 Description. Total length 3.2–5.3 mm, standard length 3.0– 4.8 mm; body rhomboid oval (Fig. 19), derm blackish brown, scales elongate, dingy white to light yellow; prosternal channel absent; elytral apices round leaving apex of pygidium exposed. Male: rostrum curved moderately at base, distal portion curved less (Fig. 24), anteantennal portion 0.33–0.37X length of rostrum; scape lamellate and gradually widened (Fig. 13), first desmomere at least 1.5X longer than second, distal desmomeres increasingly asymmetrical, dorsally expanded and lamellate, club with basomere excised and with distinct conical process (as in Fig. 7); metatibia often with subdistal tooth on ventral margin above corbel (Fig. 4); tarsomeres normal, without specialized setae; apex of aedeagus pointed, basal portion of internal sac one-half as long as apodemes, without obvious longitudinal folds (Fig. 31), median and distal portions with armature consisting of numerous anvil-shaped, 65–90 Mm long denticles. Female: rostrum curved abruptly at base, distal portion nearly straight (Fig. 28), glabrous, entire flank with fine but distinct punctures, anteantennal portion 0.44–0.46X length of rostrum; first desmomere at least 1.5X longer than second, club short-ovate, approximately as long as first desmomere; tibiae normal, without additional subdistal tooth.</p><p>Distribution. Coastal regions of southeastern United States (North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama), Arkansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas (Fig. 33).</p><p>Temporal occurrence. End of May to early October; December [1 date], February [1 date].</p><p>Plant association. Asclepiadaceae: Asclepias tuberosa (2X). Asteraceae: Arnoglossum atriplicifolium [as Mesadenia tuberosa] (2X), Helenium sp. (71X), H. vernale [as H. nuttallii] (2X), Heterotheca sp. (6X), Rudbeckia hirta (14X), ‘‘ Compositae flower’’ (1X). Euphorbiaceae: Croton sp. (1X), C. agyranthemum (4X). Fabaceae: Parosela sp. (1X). Lamiaceae: Monarda citriodora (2X). Lythraceae: Lagerstroemia indica [as crepe myrtle] (1X). Poaceae: Andropogon glomeratus (2X). Solanaceae: Solanum elaeagnifolium (7X), S. torreyi (2X).</p><p>Specific epithet. A compound Latin adjective composed of calcar (5 spur) and fero (5 to bear).</p><p>Discussion. This is a cryptic, possibly halophilous species near O. salebrosus . Males of both species often possess a subapical tooth on the hind tibia and share with most congeners the apically pointed aedeagus. They can be distinguished by the shape of the scape. Female specimens can be recognized by the elongate first desmomere, the subtle but usually distinct lateral punctures on the rostrum, the slightly compressed scape, and possibly habitat data.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EDE927D8328B43C027FF6659C9FBFF	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Prena, Jens	Prena, Jens (2008): Review ofOdontocorynusSchönherr (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Baridinae) with Descriptions of Four New Species. The Coleopterists Bulletin 62 (2): 243-277, DOI: 10.1649/1074.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1649/1074.1
03EDE927D8308B45C0E9FBF25868FE5F.text	03EDE927D8308B45C0E9FBF25868FE5F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Odontocorynus creperus Boheman 1844	<div><p>Odontocorynus creperus Boheman</p><p>(Figs. 1, 9, 39)</p><p>Odontocorynus creperus Boheman 1844: 271 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘Typus’’, ‘‘ Odontocorynus / creperus S.’’, ‘‘64’’ (NHRS).</p><p>Odontocorynus limatulus Casey 1920: 434 . Syntypes 2, male, labeled: ‘‘Cuernavaca/ Mor. Mex./ Wickham’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, first specimen handwritten ‘‘limatulus/ Csy.’’, USNM type number 37913. New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus subglaber Casey 1920: 434 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘ Puebla / Mex.’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37912 ’’, ‘‘subglaber/ Csy.’’ New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus vernicicollis Casey 1920: 435 . Syntypes 2, male, labeled: ‘‘ Puebla / Mex.’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, first specimen handwritten ‘‘vernicicollis/ Csy.’’, USNM type number 37914. New synonymy.</p><p>Recognition. Male O. creperus and O. subvittatus differ from all congeners by the possession of a setose fascicle on the first ventrite. They can be distinguished reliably from each other by using the character states given in the key. Female</p><p>254 specimens may be very similar to O. latiscapus, O. procerus, and probably O. subvittatus [not studied]. In the material available for study, O. creperus differed from those other species by shorter desmomere 2, less crowded punctures on frons and pronotum, and often larger size.</p><p>Distribution. Mexico (Fig. 39).</p><p>Type locality. Mexico, site not specified .</p><p>Material examined. MEXICO. Chihuahua (USNM 2), Colima (AMNH 1, USNM 8), Guerrero (CWOB 1, USNM 2), Jalisco (AMNH 14, CMNC 17, CWOB 13, TAMU 1), México D. F. (CWOB 9, TAMU 5, USNM 61), Michoacán (CWOB 9, JPPC 4, TAMU 1, USNM 2), Morelos (CMNC 1, USNM 55), Nayarit (CWOB 5), Oaxaca (AMNH 1, CMNC 25, CWOB 1, TAMU 6), Puebla (CWOB 2, TAMU 7, USNM 5), San Luis Potosí (USNM 2), Sonora</p><p>(CMNC 1), Tlaxcala (CMNC 5, CWOB 2, JPPC 2, USNM 9), Veracruz (USNM 1). Total 267 specimens .</p><p>Temporal occurrence. Mid July to early October.</p><p>Plant association. Asteraceae: Tagetes sp. (3X), T. lucida (5X), Xanthocephalum benthamianum (12X). Fabaceae: Mimosa biuncifera (4X). Papaveraceae: Argemone sp. (3X).</p><p>Nomenclatural notes. Casey (1920) described O. limatulus, O. subglaber, and O. vernicicollis based on individual rather than interspecific differences.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EDE927D8308B45C0E9FBF25868FE5F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Prena, Jens	Prena, Jens (2008): Review ofOdontocorynusSchönherr (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Baridinae) with Descriptions of Four New Species. The Coleopterists Bulletin 62 (2): 243-277, DOI: 10.1649/1074.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1649/1074.1
03EDE927D8368B46C0E1FE125BCBFE0D.text	03EDE927D8368B46C0E1FE125BCBFE0D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Odontocorynus falsus (LeConte)	<div><p>Odontocorynus falsus (LeConte)</p><p>(Fig. 33)</p><p>Centrinus falsus LeConte 1876: 315 . Lectotype male, designated here, with red disk, labeled: ‘‘C./ falsus/ LeC.’’, ‘‘Horn Coll/ 8938’’, ‘‘ LECTOTYPUS / Centrinus / falsus LeConte / Prena design. 2007’’ (MCZ). Paralectotype 1, female, with disk and label: ‘‘C./ falsus/ Horn’’, ‘‘LeConte/ Collection’’ (MCZ).</p><p>Geraeus falsus . Leng (1920).</p><p>Centrinaspis falsa . Casey (1920).</p><p>Centrinus (Odontocorynus) falsus . Wagener Green (1920).</p><p>Odontocorynus falsus . O’Brien &amp; Wibmer (1982).</p><p>Nicentrus falsus . Kuschel (1983); species erroneously attributed to Casey.</p><p>Recognition. In the United States, this is the only Odontocorynus with a slender body shape; it is part of a complex that is more diverse in Mexico (see also Wagener Green 1920). Male O. falsus are recognized easily by the pronotal protuberance on the anterolateral margin, which is absent in all congeners in the US. Female O. falsus were confused frequently with Nicentrus and Linogeraeus in collections. They can be recognized by the laterally costate prosternal channel, which in the US otherwise occurs only in Nicentrus grossulus, a species with a shorter rostrum and bulky pronotum. The Mexican O. procerus is very similar in both sexes, and can be distinguished by character states of the antenna.</p><p>Distribution. Eastern and central United States (Fig. 33).</p><p>Type locality. United States, site not specified .</p><p>Material examined. UNITED STATES: Alabama (JPPC 1, USNM 5), Arkansas (TAMU 2), Connecticut (AMNH 2, CWOB 3), District of Columbia (USNM 4), Georgia (CWOB 1), Indiana (CWOB 9, JPPC 2, USNM 1), Iowa (CWOB 1, JPPC 2, USNM 1), Kansas (USNM 5), Maryland (CNCI 5, JPPC 2, USNM 13), Massachusetts (AMNH 1, USNM 1), Missouri (CNCI 1, JPPC 2, TAMU 3), New Hampshire (AMNH 1), New York (AMNH 5, USNM 1), North Carolina (AMNH 2, CMNC 2, CWOB 4, TAMU 2), Oklahoma (CWOB 8, JPPC 4, TAMU 23), Pennsylvania (AMNH 1, USNM 2; Wagener Green 1920), South Carolina (JCCC 7), Tennessee (CWOB 1), Texas (JPPC 2, TAMU 5), Virginia (USNM 2), West Virginia (CMNC 3, CWOB 3, JPPC 2), Wisconsin (CWOB 1); without locality data (MCZ 3) . Total 151 specimens.</p><p>Temporal occurrence. June [1 date], August to October.</p><p>Plant association. Solidago sp. (3X).</p><p>Nomenclatural notes. The description states that the type series included four specimens, males and females, from the middle and southern United States. The two specimens mentioned above under type material are mounted exactly the same way and may have been collected together. I was unable to recognize the remaining two specimens of the original series. Possible candidates are one</p><p>256 specimen labeled ‘‘N.Y’’, Coll/ MLLinell’’, ‘‘Centrin./ falsus/LeC.’’ (USNM), five specimens with the first labeled ‘‘Topeka Ks/ Popenoe.’’, ‘‘225’’, ‘‘LeConte/ det.’’, ‘‘ Centrinus / falsus/ LeC./ 8938’’ (USNM), one specimen labeled ‘‘Horn Coll/ H’’, ‘‘79.’’ (MCZ), and two specimens in the Casey Collection labeled ‘‘Ala’’ and ‘‘Ia’’ (USNM). These are the only correct identifications I have seen, except for those by Wagener Green (1920) and O’Brien &amp; Wibmer (1982) who placed the species in Odontocorynus . Because not all syntypes could be recognized and LeConte and Horn attribute the authorship to each other, I here designate the male specimen of the Horn Collection as lectotype, with the purpose of promoting stability of the name.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EDE927D8368B46C0E1FE125BCBFE0D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Prena, Jens	Prena, Jens (2008): Review ofOdontocorynusSchönherr (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Baridinae) with Descriptions of Four New Species. The Coleopterists Bulletin 62 (2): 243-277, DOI: 10.1649/1074.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1649/1074.1
03EDE927D8358B46C0C6FE435947FDD2.text	03EDE927D8358B46C0C6FE435947FDD2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Odontocorynus histriculus Casey 1920	<div><p>Odontocorynus histriculus Casey</p><p>(Fig. 37)</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EDE927D8358B46C0C6FE435947FDD2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Prena, Jens	Prena, Jens (2008): Review ofOdontocorynusSchönherr (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Baridinae) with Descriptions of Four New Species. The Coleopterists Bulletin 62 (2): 243-277, DOI: 10.1649/1074.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1649/1074.1
03EDE927D8358B58C035FB9A596BFB2C.text	03EDE927D8358B58C035FB9A596BFB2C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Odontocorynus larvatus (Boheman)	<div><p>Odontocorynus larvatus (Boheman)</p><p>(Figs. 26, 30, 32, 35)</p><p>Centrinus larvatus Boheman 1844: 218 . Lectotype female, here designated, labeled: ‘‘Typus’’, Champion’s handwriting ‘‘ Odontocorynus / larvatus Boh’’, ‘‘ C. Larvatus / Chevrol./ Mexico – Chev’’, ‘‘65’’, ‘‘ ♀ ’’ (NHRS, Schönherr Collection); paralectotype female, labeled: ‘‘Typus’’, ‘‘ Mexico / Chevrolat:/ 683.’’, ‘‘Oi’’ [error], ‘‘abut/ … [illegible]’’, ‘‘39’’ (NHRS, Chevrolat Collection).</p><p>Centrinus (Odontocorynus) larvatus . Casey (1892).</p><p>Odontocorynus larvatus . Champion (1908).</p><p>Nicentrus contractus Casey 1892: 609 (table), 613. Holotype female, labeled: ‘‘Capron/ 4.4 Fla’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37935 ’’, ‘‘contractus/ Csy.’’. New synonymy.</p><p>Recognition. Odontocorynus larvatus generally can be recognized by its relatively dense vestiture, except for very small specimens which tend to have rather inconspicuous scales. In northern Florida, where O. umbellae occurs, female specimens are needed when the identification based on male character states alone remains inconclusive. The same applies to O. salebrosus, which can be distinguished reliably from O. larvatus based on female character states. Odontocorynus calcarifer is another sympatric species, and should be separable from O. larvatus by using Table 1.</p><p>Distribution. United States, Florida and adjacent coast of Alabama (Fig. 35); single records from Texas (USNM) and Mexico (type series) are unconfirmed and probably erroneous.</p><p>Type locality. Supposedly Mexico .</p><p>Material examined. MEXICO: without locality data (NHRS 2). UNITED STATES: Florida (AMNH 7, CMNC 75, CNCI 42, CWOB 405, JPPC 14, TAMU 152, USNM 534), Alabama (CWOB 29, JPPC 10, USNM 21), Texas without locality (USNM 1). Total 1294 specimens.</p><p>Temporal occurrence. May to mid October.</p><p>Plant association. Annonaceae: Asimina pygmaea (1X). Asclepiadaceae: Asclepias sp. (2X). Asteraceae: Eupatorium mohrii (3X), Flaveria linearis (13X). Clusiaceae: Hypericum edisonianum (1X). Cyperaceae: Cyperus sp. (18). Droseraceae: Drosera sp. (3X). Fabaceae: Vigna unguiculata [as black-eyed pea] (1X). Onagraceae: Gaura angustifolia (2X).</p><p>258 Nomenclatural notes. Boheman described Centrinus larvatus from the Chevrolat Collection. I received two identically pinned female specimens from the NHRS; one stood in the Chevrolat Collection, the other in the Schönherr Collection, both labeled as types. Although the description gives no information about the number of specimens included, I consider both as syntypes. Because of this ambiguity and Champion’s (1908) citation of a single type, I here designate the specimen of the Schönherr Collection as lectotype of C. larvatus . Odontocorynus larvatus was recognized in some collections as a distinct but unnamed species, but has never been associated with this long-available name.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EDE927D8358B58C035FB9A596BFB2C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Prena, Jens	Prena, Jens (2008): Review ofOdontocorynusSchönherr (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Baridinae) with Descriptions of Four New Species. The Coleopterists Bulletin 62 (2): 243-277, DOI: 10.1649/1074.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1649/1074.1
03EDE927D82B8B59C033FAA258B6FC6C.text	03EDE927D82B8B59C033FAA258B6FC6C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Odontocorynus latiscapus Champion	<div><p>Odontocorynus latiscapus Champion</p><p>(Figs. 10, 37)</p><p>Odontocorynus latiscapus Champion 1908: 318 . Syntypes 10, 9 males, 1 not located, labeled: (1) ‘‘Type’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘sp. figured’’, ‘‘Omilteme,/ Guerrero,/ 8000 ft. / July, H.H. Smith.’’; (2) ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘Omilteme,/ Guerrero,/ 8000 ft. / July, H.H. Smith.’’; (3) ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘Omilteme,/ Guerrero,/ 8000 ft. / August, H.H. Smith.’’; (4–5) ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘Xucumanatlan,/ Guerrero,/ 7000 ft. / July, H.H. Smith.’’; (6) ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘PARADA’’, ‘‘ Mexico / Salle Collection’’; (7) ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘Cerro de Plumas/ Mexico./ Hoege.’’; (8) ‘‘Omilteme,/ Guerrero,/ 8000 ft. / July, H.H. Smith.’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ’’GCChampion/Determined’’, handwritten ‘‘ Odontocorynus / latiscapus, Cha. ’’; (9) ‘‘Cerro de Plumas/ Mexico./ Hoege’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, handwritten ‘‘Odontoc./ latiscapus/ Ch’’; specimens 1–7 with printed label ‘‘B.C.A. Col. IV.5./ Odontocorynus / latiscapus,/ Champ.’’ (BMNH 7, USNM/Casey Coll. 2).</p><p>Recognition. Within the complex with the laterally carinate prosternal channel, male O. latiscapus can be easily recognized by the peculiar modification of the scape. Female specimens are very similar to those of O. falsus, O. procerus, O. creperus, and probably O. subvittatus [not studied]. Odontocorynus falsus, and possibly O. procerus, can be separated because of allopatry, and O. creperus because of its shorter desmomere 2 and more widely spaced pronotal punctures. Female O. subvittatus were not available for study or may not have been recognized by me. The female O. latiscapus available for study tended to have a relatively dense, yellowish dorsal vestiture which is noticeably different from that of males. Because of this sexual dimorphism, Champion did not include a single female specimen in the type series.</p><p>Distribution. Mexico, except Atlantic side (Fig. 37).</p><p>Type locality. Mexico .</p><p>Material examined. MEXICO: Durango (MNHUB 1), Guerrero (BMNH 5, USNM 1), Hidalgo (CWOB 1), México D.F. (CWOB 1), Nayarit (CWOB 1, TAMU 1), Oaxaca (BMNH 3, CMNC 14, CWOB 6, JPPC 11, TAMU 62, USNM 2). Total 108 specimens .</p><p>Temporal occurrence. July to early September.</p><p>Plant association. None recorded.</p><p>Nomenclatural notes. The series at the BMNH includes one female specimen from Oaxaca, with Champion’s handwritten label ‘‘? latiscapus ♀ Ch’ ’ and a printed label referring to the Biologia Centrali-Americana. The description does not mention this specimen, therefore it does not belong to the type series .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EDE927D82B8B59C033FAA258B6FC6C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Prena, Jens	Prena, Jens (2008): Review ofOdontocorynusSchönherr (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Baridinae) with Descriptions of Four New Species. The Coleopterists Bulletin 62 (2): 243-277, DOI: 10.1649/1074.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1649/1074.1
03EDE927D82A8B5AC011FC635A08FD08.text	03EDE927D82A8B5AC011FC635A08FD08.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Odontocorynus luteogramma Prena 2008	<div><p>Odontocorynus luteogramma Prena, new species</p><p>(Figs. 20, 38)</p><p>Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘ MEXICO, G[uerre]ro., 6 km./ NW. Acahuizotla / 17- I-1986 ’’, ‘‘ H. Brailovsky / &amp; E. Barrera’ ’, ‘‘ HOLOTYPE / Odontocorynus / luteogramma/ Prena’ ’ (California Academy of Sciences, on long-term loan to CWOB) .</p><p>Paratypes 6 males, 7 females: Mexico, Chiapas, 7 mi. SE Chispa de Corso, 23.6.1965, Burke, Meyer, Schaffner (JPPC 2, USNM 1, TAMU 4); Guerrero, 6 km NW Acahuizotla, 17.1.1986, H. Brailovsky, E. Barrera (CWOB 1, JPPC 2, USNM 1); Michoacán, San Jose Purua, 2.8.1958, A.E. Lewis (CWOB 1) ; Oaxaca, Pinotepa-Salina Cruz km 244, 18.10.990, E. Barrera, A. Cardena, E. Ramírez (CWOB 1) .</p><p>Description. Total length 3.8–5.0 mm, standard length 3.6–4.8 mm; body moderately elongate, derm black, legs partially rufous, scales oblong ovate with apex blunt, light yellow in median and lateral pronotal vittae, interstriae 2, 4, and 6, and on venter, brown and rather inconspicuous elsewhere (Fig. 20); prosternal channel absent; elytral apices rounded conjointly and covering pygidium. Male: rostrum curved evenly, flank coarsely punctate and carinate basally, finely punctate apically, anteantennal portion 0.32–0.34X length of rostrum; scape widened distally (as in Fig. 11), desmomeres 1 and 2 of subequal length, distal desmomeres increasingly asymmetrical, dorsally expanded and lamellate, club ovate, basomere with distinct process; tibiae normal, without additional subdistal 260 tooth; tarsomeres normal, without specialized setae; aedeagus as in Fig. 32, apex pointed, basal portion of internal sac one-half as long as apodemes, median and distal portions with armature consisting of numerous anvil-shaped denticles. Female: rostrum curved at base, distal portion nearly straight, glabrous, flank with punctures fine and decreasing in size toward apex, anteantennal portion 0.40–0.44X length of rostrum; desmomeres 1 and 2 of subequal length, club ovate, approximately as long as desmomeres 1 and 2 combined; tibiae normal, without additional subdistal tooth.</p><p>Distribution. Central and southern Mexico: Chiapas, Guerrero, Michoacán, Oaxaca (Fig. 38).</p><p>Temporal occurrence. January, June, August, October [1 date each].</p><p>Plant association. None recorded.</p><p>Specific epithet. A female compound noun in apposition composed of luteus [Latin] and gramma [Latinized from Ancient Greek, cRAmmg], meaning ‘‘yellow line.’’</p><p>Discussion. Odontocorynus luteogramma is one of the more colorful and thus easily recognizable species. However, as in O. suturaflava, the color pattern can be quite deceiving and may cause confusion with species in other genera, such as Linogeraeus .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EDE927D82A8B5AC011FC635A08FD08	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Prena, Jens	Prena, Jens (2008): Review ofOdontocorynusSchönherr (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Baridinae) with Descriptions of Four New Species. The Coleopterists Bulletin 62 (2): 243-277, DOI: 10.1649/1074.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1649/1074.1
03EDE927D8298B5BC012FD4759EBFEC7.text	03EDE927D8298B5BC012FD4759EBFEC7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Odontocorynus nunume Prena 2008	<div><p>Odontocorynus nunume Prena, new species</p><p>(Figs. 8, 21, 38)</p><p>Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘ Mexico / Sierra Mixteca [Puebla or Oaxaca]/ C. A. Purpus S. V.’’, ‘‘115’’, ‘‘ HOLOTYPE / Odontocorynus / nunume Prena / Prena design. 2007’’, 3 legs and 2 tarsi missing, re-mounted on point (MNHUB).</p><p>Paratypes 1 male, 6 females: Mexico, Sierra Mixteca, C.A. Purpus [male with all legs and right funicle missing] (MNHUB 1, JPPC 1); Hidalgo, 12 mi [19 km] S Zimapan, 6700’ [2400 m], 28.5.1974, C.W. &amp; L. O’Brien &amp; B. Marshall (CWOB 2, JPPC 2); Durango, Durango, Wickham (USNM 1) .</p><p>Description. Total length 3.7–4.1 mm, standard length 3.3–3.7 mm; body rhomboid oval, derm brownish black, dorsal vestiture of slender ochreous scales intermixed with slightly wider white scales on elytral disk and pronotum (Fig. 21); scutellum, prescutellar lobe of pronotum, and venter with imbricate white scales; prosternal channel absent; elytral apices rounded narrowly and covering most of pygidium. Male: rostrum curved evenly, subcostate, intervals with confluent punctures, anteantennal portion 0.30X length of rostrum; scape lamellate and gradually widened (as in Fig. 13), third desmomere funnel-shaped and distended to fifth desmomere (Fig. 8), distal desmomere asymmetrical, dorsally expanded and lamellate, club with basomere excised and process pointed (Fig. 8); anterolateral margin of prosternum without tubercle; tarsomeres missing and not examined for presence of specialized setae; genitalia not examined. Female: rostrum rather evenly curved (similar to Fig. 30), glabrous, entire flank with distinct punctures, anteantennal portion 0.47X length of rostrum; desmomeres 1 and 2 subequal, club ovate, approximately as long as first two desmomeres combined; tibiae normal, without additional subdistal tooth.</p><p>Distribution. Central Mexico: Durango, Hidalgo, Oaxaca (Fig. 38).</p><p>Temporal occurrence. May [1 date].</p><p>Plant association. None recorded.</p><p>Specific epithet. A noun in apposition referring to Ñuñume, or the land of the clouds, where part of the series was collected.</p><p>Discussion. Male O. nunume are unmistakable by the peculiar modification of the antenna, i.e., the deeply excised club and the funnel-shaped third desmomere. The mixed, bicolored dorsal vestiture is also distinctive.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EDE927D8298B5BC012FD4759EBFEC7	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Prena, Jens	Prena, Jens (2008): Review ofOdontocorynusSchönherr (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Baridinae) with Descriptions of Four New Species. The Coleopterists Bulletin 62 (2): 243-277, DOI: 10.1649/1074.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1649/1074.1
03EDE927D8288B5BC038FE895965FA4A.text	03EDE927D8288B5BC038FE895965FA4A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Odontocorynus procerus Prena 2008	<div><p>Odontocorynus procerus Prena, new species</p><p>(Figs. 22, 39)</p><p>Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘ MEXICO, Coah [uila], Hwy./ 57, 15 mi. SE. Saltillo,/ 7000’ 12 Sept. 1982 C. &amp;/ L. O’Brien &amp; G. Wibmer’ ’, ‘‘ HOLOTYPE / Odontocorynus / procerus/ Prena’ ’ (California Academy of Sciences, on longterm loan to CWOB) .</p><p>Paratypes 2 males, 4 females: Mexico, Coahuila, 15 mi [24 km] SE Saltillo, 7000’ [2135 m], 12.9.1982, C.W. &amp; L. O’Brien, G. Wibmer (CWOB 1, USNM 1); Nuevo León, Hwy. 58, 32 mi [51 km] W Linares, 6000’ [1830 m], 11.9.1982, C.W. &amp; L. O’Brien, G. Wibmer (CWOB 2, JPPC 2) .</p><p>Description. Total length 4.2–4.8 mm, standard length 3.9–4.4 mm; body elongate, derm black, scales elongate, dingy white, not forming pattern (Fig. 22); pronotal punctures dense, interspaces with trend to longitudinal ridges; prosternum channeled, its lateral edge interrupted by subapical constriction; elytral apices rounded conjointly and covering pygidium. Male: rostrum curved weakly and rather evenly, flank punctate coarsely throughout, anteantennal portion 0.33X length of rostrum; scape lamellate and gradually widened, first desmomere approximately 1.5X longer than second, distal desmomeres increasingly asymmetrical, dorsally expanded and lamellate, club elongate-ovate, as long as width of eye, basomere excised and with distinct conical process; anterolateral margin of pronotum with tubercle; ventrite 1 depressed, without setose fascicle; tibiae normal, without additional subdistal tooth; tarsomeres normal, without specialized setae; aedeagus as in Fig. 31, apex pointed, basal portion of internal sac one-half as long as apodemes, median and distal portions with armature consisting of numerous anvil-shaped denticles. Female: rostrum curved moderately at base, distal portion less curved, glabrous, flank with punctures gradually decreasing in size toward apex, anteantennal portion 0.47X length of rostrum; first desmomere approximately 1.5X longer than second, club ovate, approximately as long as first desmomere; tibiae normal, without additional subdistal tooth.</p><p>Distribution. Northeastern Mexico, Sierra Madre Oriental: Coahuila, Nuevo León (Fig. 39).</p><p>Temporal occurrence. September [2 dates].</p><p>Plant association. None recorded.</p><p>Specific epithet. A regular Latin adjective, first and second declension, meaning elongate.</p><p>Discussion. Odontocorynus procerus is very closely related to O. falsus, which occurs further north. These species differ chiefly in male character states of the antenna, i.e., size of the club and shape of the scape. I have seen another undescribed species of this complex that is intermediate between O. procerus and O. latiscapus . Females may be identified by their dingy white vestiture (usually yellow in O. falsus) and distributional range.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EDE927D8288B5BC038FE895965FA4A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Prena, Jens	Prena, Jens (2008): Review ofOdontocorynusSchönherr (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Baridinae) with Descriptions of Four New Species. The Coleopterists Bulletin 62 (2): 243-277, DOI: 10.1649/1074.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1649/1074.1
03EDE927D8288B5DC0D9FA045AD7FF39.text	03EDE927D8288B5DC0D9FA045AD7FF39.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Odontocorynus pulverulentus (Casey)	<div><p>Odontocorynus pulverulentus (Casey)</p><p>(Figs. 12, 16, 33)</p><p>Centrinus pulverulentus Casey 1892: 600 . Lectotype female, here designated, labeled ‘‘N.C.’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘pulverulentus-2/ PARATYPE</p><p>262 USNM/ 37881’’, ‘‘ LECTOTYPUS / Centrinus / pulverulentus Casey / Prena design. 2007.’’ Paralectotypes 1 male, 4 females, labeled (1) ‘‘N.C.’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37881’’, ‘‘pulverulentus/ Csy.’’; (2) same as lectotype except ‘‘pulverulentus-3’’; (3) ‘‘Col.’’, ‘‘June’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37875’’, ‘‘coloradensis/ Csy’’; (4) ‘‘Luling Tex/ Wickham’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37882’’, ‘‘lulingensis/ Csy’’; (5) ‘‘Col.’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37876’’, ‘‘densissimus/ Csy’’ [see nomenclatural notes below].</p><p>Odontocorynus pulverulentus . Blatchley &amp; Leng (1916).</p><p>Odontocorynes coloradensis Casey 1920: 418 (in table). Holotype female, labeled ‘‘Col.’’, ‘‘June’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37875 ’’, ‘‘coloradensis/ Csy.’’ New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus lulingensis Casey 1920: 422 (in table). Holotype female, labeled ‘‘Luling Tex/ Wickham’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37882 ’’, ‘‘lulingensis/ Csy.’’ New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus densissimus Casey 1920: 419 (in table). Holotype female, labeled ‘‘Col.’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37876 ’’, ‘‘densissimus/ Csy.’’ New synonymy.</p><p>Recognition. This is the only species with scaled elytral striae. If the scales are abraded, one should verify the absence of fine hairs in the punctures with at least 40X magnification.</p><p>Distribution. United States and possibly adjacent Mexico, southern half of Great Plains (Fig. 33).</p><p>Type locality. United States, supposedly North Carolina .</p><p>Material examined. UNITED STATES: Colorado (CWOB 2, USNM 2), Kansas (USNM 2), Minnesota (CWOB 7), Nebraska (CMNC 3, CWOB 35, JPPC 1, TAMU 1, UNSM 26, USNM 18), New Mexico (CWOB 6, TAMU 5, USNM 6), North Carolina (USNM 4, provenance suspect), Oklahoma (CWOB 8, TAMU 14, USNM 29), South Dakota (TAMU 2), Texas (AMNH 3, CMNC 20, CWOB 59, TAMU 156, USNM 129), Wyoming (TAMU 1) . Total 539 specimens.</p><p>Temporal occurrence. Mid April to mid October.</p><p>Plant association. Asteraceae: Aphanostephus skirrhobasis (1X), Gaillardia pulchella (2X), Gutierrezia sarothrae (2X), Helianthus sp. (2X), Ratibida columnaris (2X), Rudbeckia sp. (2X), Thelesperma simplicifolium (3X), Gutierrezia sarothrae [as Xanthocephalum sarothrae] (1X). Fabaceae: Vigna unguiculata [as black-eyed pea] (1X). Lamiaceae: Monarda punctata [as horse mint] (4X). Solanaceae: Solanum torreyi (1X).</p><p>Nomenclatural notes. Casey (1892) states ‘‘described from the female’’ and later (Casey 1920) restricts the concept of O. pulverulentus to the series from North Carolina. Accordingly, I have designated a female specimen as lectotype and disregarded Buchanan’s preliminary (but annotated) designation of a male. Included in the type series of O. pulverulentus are the single type specimens (holotypes by monotypy) of O. coloradensis, O. lulingensis, and O. densissimus which Casey (1920) described based on individual variation; not included is the differently labeled male from North Carolina (USNM type 1396) that Buchanan transferred from the addenda to the tray with the type series in 1942. The spatial distribution of the material available does not support Casey’s record from North Carolina; the ‘‘N. C.’’ on the labels of the syntypes is probably erroneous. Buchanan (1935) gives a brief account of how Casey removed original labels and replaced them with space-saving printed cards. Further cases of mislabeling are documented by Setliff (2007), Anderson (2008), and in this paper (three Brazilian records under O. umbellae).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EDE927D8288B5DC0D9FA045AD7FF39	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Prena, Jens	Prena, Jens (2008): Review ofOdontocorynusSchönherr (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Baridinae) with Descriptions of Four New Species. The Coleopterists Bulletin 62 (2): 243-277, DOI: 10.1649/1074.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1649/1074.1
03EDE927D8358B46C1D8FD8A591CFBD4.text	03EDE927D8358B46C1D8FD8A591CFBD4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Odontocorynus salebrosus	<div><p>Odontocorynus salebrosus . Champion (1909), misidentification (not Casey 1892). Odontocorynus histriculus Casey 1920: 433 . Holotype female, labeled: ‘‘Cuerna-</p><p>vaca/ Mor. Mex./ Wickham’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘ TYPE USNM /</p><p>37883’’, ‘‘histriculus/ Csy.’’ Odontocorynus hystriculus . Hustache (1938), misspelling of O. histriculus .</p><p>Recognition. Odontocorynus histriculus often can be recognized by its dorsal vestiture of semi-erect elongate scales. The body shape is intermediate to those depicted in figs. 1 and 2, and the elytral apices leave only the extreme apex of the pygidium uncovered. Odontocorynus tectus, a very similar sympatric species, is stouter (as in Fig. 2) and has the pygidium more exposed.</p><p>Distribution. Southern Mexico (Fig. 37).</p><p>Type locality. Mexico .</p><p>Material examined. MEXICO: Durango (AMNH 1), Guerrero (TAMU 4), Hidalgo (CWOB 1), Jalisco (CWOB 7, TAMU 1), Michoacán (CWOB 2), Morelos (USNM 9), Puebla (USNM 1), Oaxaca (CWOB 6, JPPC 6). Total 37 specimens .</p><p>Temporal occurrence. Mid July to mid September [15 dates].</p><p>Plant association. None recorded.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EDE927D8358B46C1D8FD8A591CFBD4	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Prena, Jens	Prena, Jens (2008): Review ofOdontocorynusSchönherr (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Baridinae) with Descriptions of Four New Species. The Coleopterists Bulletin 62 (2): 243-277, DOI: 10.1649/1074.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1649/1074.1
03EDE927D82E8B51C0EBFEB75805FDFB.text	03EDE927D82E8B51C0EBFEB75805FDFB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Odontocorynus salebrosus (Casey)	<div><p>Odontocorynus salebrosus (Casey)</p><p>(Figs. 2, 6, 11, 15, 25, 29, 36)</p><p>Centrinus salebrosus Casey 1892: 577 (table), 598. Lectotype male, here designated, labeled: ‘‘Ind.’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37897’’, ‘‘salebrosus/ Csy.’’ Paralectotypes 25 males, 18 females, (1–13) standing under O. salebrosus, USNM types 37897/2–4, 7–11, 13–15 [specimens 5, 6, and 12 excluded because locality not mentioned in description]; (14) standing under O. alternans, USNM type 37902; (15) standing under O. boonei, USNM type 37891; (16) standing under O. convergens, USNM type 37888; (16–17) standing under O. convexus, USNM types 37898/1–2; (18) standing under O. dakotanus, USNM type 37877; (19) standing under O. dallasianus, USNM type 37907; (20) standing under O. defectus, USNM type 37901; (21–23) standing under O. greeleyi, USNM types 37879/1–3; (24) standing under O. ignotus, USNM type 37905; (25) standing under O. inflaticollis, USNM type 37890; (26–30) standing under O. inspectus, USNM types 37894/1–5; (31) standing under O. longicollis, USNM type 37904; (32–34) standing under O. ochreosus, USNM type 37878/1–3; (35) standing under O. parallelus, USNM type 37900; (36) standing under O. parvus, USNM type 37911; (37) standing under O. pusillus, USNM type 37896; (38–41) standing under O. quadricollis, USNM types 37880/1–4; (42) standing under O. regularis, USNM type 37903; (43) standing under O. rotundicollis, USNM type 37893. [According to Casey (1892), the original series included nearly 60 specimens. Because their collecting sites were not mentioned in the description, I have disregarded as paralectotypes 1 O. cribrum, 1 O. iowensis, 1 O. latiusculus, 5 O. missourianus, 1 O. onagensis, 1 O. pennianus, 1 O. prominens, and 3 O. vicksburgensis].</p><p>Odontocorynus salebrosus . Blatchley &amp; Leng (1916).</p><p>Odontocorynus selebrosus . Watson (1921), misspelling of O. salebrosus .</p><p>Centrinus denticornis Casey 1892: 577 (table), 597. Syntypes 4: 2 males, 2 females, labeled: (1) ‘‘N.C.’’, ‘‘ Oi ’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37886 ’’, ‘‘denticornis/ Csy’ ’; (2) ‘‘N.C.’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘denticornis-2/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37886 ’’; (3) ‘‘ Douglas Co. / Kan. 900 ft’’, ‘‘ Oi ’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37884 ’’, ‘‘snowi/ Csy’ ’; (4) ‘‘Ks.’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37855 ’’, ‘‘robustus/ Csy.’’ New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus denticornis . Blatchley &amp; Leng (1916).</p><p>Centrinus pinguescens Casey 1892: 577 (table), 599. Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘Little Rock/ Arkansas’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37889 ’’, ‘‘pinguescens/ Csy.’’ New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus pinguescens . Blatchley &amp; Leng (1916).</p><p>Odontocorynus alternans Casey 1920: 429 . Holotype female, labeled: ‘‘Ky.’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37902 ’’, ‘‘alternans/ Csy.’’. New</p><p>synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus boonei Casey 1920: 421 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘Ky.’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37891 ’’, ‘‘boonei/ Csy.’’ New</p><p>synonymy.</p><p>264 Odontocorynus convergens Casey 1920: 424 . Holotype female, labeled: ‘‘Ky.’’, ‘‘ CASEY / bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘ TYPE USNM/ 37888 ’’, ‘‘convergens/ Csy.’’.</p><p>New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus convexus Casey 1920: 427 . Syntypes 2, male, labeled: (1) ‘‘L’’ [stands for Levette Collection], ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37898 ’’, ‘‘convexus/ Csy’’; (2) ‘‘Ind.’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘convexus-2/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37898.’’ New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus cribrum Casey 1920: 431 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘ A. Frost / Southboro / 9-13 Mass’ ’, ‘‘ Oi ’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37909 ’’, ‘‘cribrum/ Csy.’’. New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus crebrum . Hustache (1938), misspelling of O. cribrum .</p><p>Odontocorynus dakotanus Casey 1920: 419 . Holotype female, labeled: ‘‘Dac.’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37877 ’’, ‘‘dakotanus/ Csy.’’.</p><p>New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus dallasianus Casey 1920: 431 . Syntypes 2+ [description mentions female specimen(s)], one specimen located, male, labeled: ‘‘Tex’’ [encoded; stands for Dallas, Wickham], ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37907 ’’, ‘‘dallasianus/ Csy.’’ New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus defectus Casey 1920: 428 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘Ky.’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37901 ’’, ‘‘defectus/ Csy.’’ New</p><p>synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus greeleyi Casey 1920: 420 . Syntypes 3: 2 males, 1 female, labeled: (1) ‘‘Holly/ Col’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37879 ’’, ‘‘greeleyi/ Csy’’; (2) ‘‘Holly/ Col’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘greeleyi-2/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37879 ’’; (3) ‘‘Greeley/ Col’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘greeleyi-3/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37879.’’ New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus ignotus Casey 1920: 430 . Holotype female, labeled: ‘‘Ind.’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37905 ’’, ‘‘ignotus/ Csy.’’. New</p><p>synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus inflaticollis Casey 1920: 425 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘Ky.’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37890 ’’, ‘‘inflaticollis/ Csy.’’.</p><p>New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus inspectus Casey 1920: 420 . Syntypes 5: 4 males, 1 female, labeled: (1) ‘‘Ky.’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘ TYPE USNM/ 37894 ’’, ‘‘inspectus/ Csy’’; (2) ‘‘Ky.’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘inspectus-3/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37894 ’’; (3) ‘‘Ky.’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘inspectus-4/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37894 ’’; (4) ‘‘Ky.’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘inspectus-5/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37894 ’’; (5) ‘‘Ky.’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘inspectus-6/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37894 .’’ New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus iowensis Casey 1920: 427 . Holotype female, labeled: ‘‘ Iowa Cy / Iowa.’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37899 ’’, ‘‘iowensis/ Csy.’’. New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus latiusculus Casey 1920: 425 . Holotype female, labeled: ‘‘Mo’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37892 ’’, ‘‘latiusculus/ Csy.’’.</p><p>New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus longicollis Casey 1920: 429 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘Ky’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37904 ’’, ‘‘longicollis/ Csy.’’ New</p><p>synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus missourianus Casey 1920: 423 . Syntypes 5: 4 males, 1 female, labeled: (1) ‘‘Mo’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘ TYPE USNM/ 37887 ’’, ‘‘missourianus/ Csy’’; (2) ‘‘Vicksbg/ Miss.’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘missourianus-2/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37887 ’’; (3) ‘‘Vicksg/ Miss.’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘missourianus-3/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37887 ’’; (4) ‘‘Vicksbg/ Miss.’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘missourianus-4/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37887 ’’; (5) ‘‘Mo’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘missourianus-6/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37887 .’’ New</p><p>synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus ochreosus Casey 1920: 419 . Syntypes 3, female, labeled: (1) ‘‘Col’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37878 ’’, ‘‘ochreosus/ Csy.’’; (2) ‘‘Col’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘ochreosus-2/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37878 ’’; (3) ‘‘Col’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘ochreosus-3/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37878.’’ New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus onagensis Casey 1920: 431 . Holotype female, labeled: ‘‘ Onaga / Ks. Knaus’ ’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37908 ’’, ‘‘onagensis/ Csy.’’ New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus parallelus Casey 1920: 428 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘Dallas, Tex/ Wickham’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37900 ’’, ‘‘parallelus/ Csy.’’ New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus parvus Casey 1920: 432 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘N. Y’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37911 ’’, ‘‘parvus/ Csy.’’. New</p><p>synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus pennianus Casey 1920: 431 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘Conewago/ VI.21.11 Pa’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37910 ’’, ‘‘pennianus/ Csy.’’ New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus prominens Casey 1920: 425 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘D. C’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37895 ’’, ‘‘prominens/ Csy.’’.</p><p>New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus pusillus Casey 1920: 425 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘Ky’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37896 ’’, ‘‘pusillus/Csy.’’ New</p><p>synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus quadricollis Casey 1920: 420 . Syntypes 4, female, labeled: (1) ‘‘Dac’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘ TYPE USNM/ 37880 ’’, ‘‘quadricollis/ Csy.’’; (2) ‘‘Dac’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘quadricollis-2/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37880 ’’; (3) ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘quadricollis-3/ PARA- TYPE USNM/ 37880 ’’; (4) ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘quadricollis-4/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37880 .’’ New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus regularis Casey 1920: 429 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘Ky’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37903 ’’, ‘‘regularis/ Csy.’’. New</p><p>synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus robustus Casey 1920: 422 . Holotype female, labeled: ‘‘Ks.’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37855 ’’, ‘‘robustus/ Csy.’’ New</p><p>synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus rotundicollis Casey 1920: 426 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘Tex.’’ [encoded; stands for Dallas, Wickham], ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37893 ’’, ‘‘rotundicollis/ Csy.’’ New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus snowi Casey 1920: 422 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘ Douglas Co. / Kan. 900 ft’’, ‘‘ Oi ’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37884 ’’, ‘‘snowi/ Csy.’’ New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus vicksburgensis Casey 1920: 430 . Syntypes 3: 2 males, 1 female, labeled: (1) ‘‘Vicksbg/ Miss.’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37906 ’’, ‘‘vicksburgensis/ Csy.’’; (2) ‘‘Vicksbg/ Miss.’’, ‘‘Oi’’,</p><p>266 ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘vicksburgensis-2/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37906 ’’; (3) ‘‘Miss’’ [encoded; stands for Vicksburg’’, ‘‘ CASEY / bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘vicksburgensis-3/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37906.’’ New synonymy.</p><p>Recognition. Most O. salebrosus are easily identifiable, except for female specimens from the southeastern United States where O. calcarifer and O. larvatus occur. In particular, small and abraded specimens require direct comparison with typical specimens. As in O. umbellae, reliable identification may be possible only when representative material of both sexes is available for study.</p><p>Distribution. Southern Canada and U.S.A. east of Rocky Mountains (Fig. 36); one record from El Salvador suspect.</p><p>Type locality. United States, Indiana .</p><p>Material examined. CANADA: Alberta (CMNC 2, CNCI 4), Manitoba (CNCI 9), Ontario (CMNC 13, CNCI 156, USNM 1), Québec (CMNC 1, CNCI 12), Saskatchewan (CMNC 1, CNCI 10). UNITED STATES: Alabama (CWOB 3, USNM 66), Arizona (CMNC 1), Arkansas (CMNC 1, CNCI 2, CWOB 2, TAMU 2, USNM 16), Colorado (AMNH 1, CNCI 1, CWOB 1, UNSM 1, USNM 14), Connecticut (AMNH 10, CNCI 2, CWOB 9, USNM 12), Delaware (CWOB 1), District of Columbia (CNCI 1, USNM 39), Florida (AMNH 1, CMNC 1, CWOB 11, USNM 1), Georgia (CWOB 1, USNM 2), Illinois (CWOB 59, USNM 13), Indiana (AMNH 2, CWOB 31, USNM 9), Iowa (AMNH 1, CWOB 1, USNM 35), Kansas (CMNC 3, CWOB 13, USNM 22), Kentucky (CWOB 3, USNM 6), Louisiana (AMNH 16, CMNC 7, CNCI 8, CWOB 23, USNM 95), Maryland (CMNC 3, CNCI 26, CWOB 10, USNM 114), Massachusetts (AMNH 6, CMNC 1, CNCI 6, CWOB 5, USNM 20), Michigan (AMNH 2, TAMU 2, UNSM 2, USNM 6), Minnesota (CWOB 1), Mississippi (AMNH 2, CMNC 4, CWOB 6, TAMU 5, USNM 17), Missouri (AMNH 4, CMNC 1, CNCI 1, CWOB 51, TAMU 3, USNM 24), Nebraska (CWOB 1, UNSM 6, TAMU 1, USNM 3), New Hampshire (CNCI 4), New Jersey (AMNH 5, CNCI 2, UNSM 1, USNM 19), New York (AMNH 102, CNCI 5, CWOB 2, USNM 84), North Carolina (CMNC 3, CWOB 11, TAMU 3, USNM 5), North Dakota (CMNC 22, CNCI 4, CWOB 30, USNM 1), Oklahoma (CNCI 14, CWOB 8, TAMU 4, USNM 20), Ohio (AMNH 4, CMNC 1, CWOB 19, UNSM 2, USNM 4), Pennsylvania (AMNH 4, CNCI 8, CWOB 2, USNM 24), Rhode Island (USNM 4), South Carolina (CMNC 1, CNCI 5, CWOB 6, JCCC 42), South Dakota (AMNH 1, CMNC 20, CNCI 5, USNM 7), Tennessee (CMNC 8, CWOB 21, TAMU 16, USNM 2), Texas (CMNC 107, CNCI 1, CWOB 40, TAMU 4, UNSM 1, USNM 63), Vermont (AMNH 2, CWOB 1, USNM 18), Virginia (CMNC 4, CNCI 8, CWOB 42, USNM 91), West Virginia (AMNH 1, CMNC 7, CWOB 89, USNM 14), Wisconsin (CWOB 1, TAMU 1, UNSM 1). [EL SALVADOR: San Andres (USNM 2)]. Total 2130 specimens.</p><p>Temporal occurrence. Mid April to early October.</p><p>Plant association. Apocynaceae: Apocynum cannabinum (2X). Asclepiadaceae: Asclepias asperula [as spider milkweed] (2X), A. fruticosa [as A. cornuta; probably misidentification] (1X), A.sullivantii (1X), Asclepias sp. (7X). Asteraceae: Achillea lanulosa (3X), Achillea sp. (1X), Aster sp. (2X), Carduus spinosissimus (4X), Coreopsis sp. (3X), Chrysanthemum vulgare (9X), Cynara sp. [as artichoke] (2X), Echinacea sp. [as cone flower] (1X), Erigeron sp. (1X), E. strigosus [as E. ramosus] (3X), Hymenoxys sp. (4X), Machaeranthera sp. [as Sideranthus] (1X), Pilosella aurantiaca [as devil’s paintbrush] (5X), Rudbeckia amplexicaulis (2X), R. hirta (50X), Rudbeckia sp. (2X). Caryophyllaceae: Stellaria graminea (1X). Cyperaceae: Eleocharis sp. (1X). Fabaceae: Cassia sp. (2X). Fagaceae: Quercus sp.</p><p>Malvaceae: Callirhoe involucrata (6X). Onagraceae: Ludwigia natans (1X). Rhamnaceae: Ceanothus americana (1X).</p><p>Nomenclatural notes. Odontocorynus salebrosus is morphologically variable. Casey (1892) initially distinguished three species based on pronotal and elytral punctation, dorsal vestiture, and size of the antennal club. My examination shows that the size of the scales decreases gradually across the Great Plains. The largest scales occur in the specimens from Colorado, at about 1500 m elevation. This type of variation has been documented for other scaled Baridinae, and regional gradients in temperature and humidity are thought to exert at least some influence (Prena 2005: 47). The size of the club is variable in all subpopulations and seems to correlate with the length of the rostrum. Casey (1920) later recognized another 29 species in his series of O. salebrosus based on minuscule, taxonomically irrelevant differences. The lectotype designation is made to promote stability of the name for this common and repeatedly described species.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EDE927D82E8B51C0EBFEB75805FDFB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Prena, Jens	Prena, Jens (2008): Review ofOdontocorynusSchönherr (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Baridinae) with Descriptions of Four New Species. The Coleopterists Bulletin 62 (2): 243-277, DOI: 10.1649/1074.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1649/1074.1
03EDE927D8388B4CC086FEC75A2DFA57.text	03EDE927D8388B4CC086FEC75A2DFA57.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Odontocorynus Schonherr	<div><p>Odontocorynus Schönherr</p><p>Odontocorynus Schönherr 1844: 271 .</p><p>Centrinus, subgenus IX. Casey (1892).</p><p>Centrinus, subgenus Odontocorynus . Casey (1892).</p><p>Odontocorynus . Champion (1908).</p><p>Odontocrynus. Manee (1924), misspelling.</p><p>Odontocerinus . Jacob (1936), misspelling.</p><p>Type species. Odontocorynus creperus Boheman (in Schönherr 1844), by original designation.</p><p>Recognition. The name Odontocorynus generally has been applied to baridine weevils with the scutellum notched and the male antenna modified as shown in figs. 6–9. The primitive condition, a simple ovate club, is preserved in O. tectus (Fig. 5), O. townsendi, and to some extent in O. salebrosus (Fig. 6). Odontocorynus is closely related to Platyonyx Schönherr 1826 and Leptoschoinus Dejean 1836, species of which usually have an elongate club. Except for some common species, the latter genera are not represented well in collections, and their phylogenetic relationships have not been explored. These genera include some species with derived, often sexually dimorphic character states, such as anterolaterally tuberculate pronotum and specialized tarsal setae, and exhibit the same range of shapes of body, elytral apices, and mandibles. A derived character state that is shared universally by all of them is an internal sac with anvil-shaped denticles.</p><p>Asymmetrical antennomeres also occur in male Loboderes, a genus with a quite different scutellum. For the purpose of this study, I maintain Odontocorynus as a distinct genus based on the following diagnostic characters: (1) mandibles prominent, triangular, cutting edge straight, with or without minute secondary tooth, (2) modification of distal desmomeres and club of male within range shown in figs. 5–9, (3) scape compressed and micro-reticulate at least in male (Figs. 10– 18), (4) scutellum with distal margin notched (Figs. 1–2), (5) prosternal spines absent, (6) derm with setiform to ovate scales set in large, shallow pits, (7) total length 2.2–6.5 mm, standard length 2.0– 6.1 mm. All species exhibit remarkable morphological variability, particularly in size (up to 250%), body proportion, color, vestiture, and details of the tegmen. Intraspecific variation often may mask interspecific differences between two species in one sex, but usually not in the other. Representative series of both sexes facilitate the identification of material particularly from the southeastern United States. The dichotomous key provided here assists in the identification of typical specimens. In addition, Table 1 summarizes diagnostic character states of species of the O. umbellae complex that occur in the central and southeastern United States.</p><p>Distribution. The extant species occur from southern Canada to Costa Rica. Most collecting records cluster in two subregions in North America, which are separated from each other by arid climatic conditions. One subregion covers most eastern and central parts of the United States and southern Canada (Figs. 33–36), the other covers the central part of Mexico (Figs. 37–39). Outside of these subregions Odontocorynus specimens are scarce. One collection of O. salebrosus 246 from El Salvador (USNM) is doubtful. Casey’s (1922) records from Brazil could not be substantiated and are dismissed here as being erroneous.</p><p>Plant association. Species of Odontocorynus were collected frequently from Asteraceae and occasionally from Annonaceae, Asclepiadaceae, Clusiaceae, Convolvulaceae, Cyperaceae, Droseraceae, Euphorbiaceae, Fabaceae, Fagaceae, Lamiaceae, Malvaceae, Onagraceae, Papaveraceae, Poaceae, Rhizophoraceae, Rubiaceae, and Solanaceae . The recorded plant associations are documented under each species. Several specimens have labels ‘‘ex [plant species]’’ or ‘‘ex flower’’, but I am not confident that they were reared. In Maryland, I monitored O. salebrosus over approximately four months in a patch of Chrysanthemum vulgare, where they swarmed very actively and fed on pollen. I found no immature stages or signs of oviposition and speculate that adults visited this plant only for feeding and reproduce elsewhere. Kissinger (1964) suspected that the larvae may develop in monocotyledonous plants.</p><p>Economic importance. Numerous species of related genera develop in the stolon, culm, root, or seeds of Poaceae, among them several cereal crops. Casey (1892) initially lumped many of these in Centrinus Schönherr and later (Casey 1920) assigned them to separate genera, such as Geraeus Pascoe, Linogeraeus Casey, Nicentrus Casey, and Odontocorynus Schönherr. At least one lineage of Geraeus (K. Nishida, in litt.) develops in Asteraceae, and flowering plants of this family seem to be an important diet of Odontocorynus species though not likely the larval host. Apart from sunflowers and one isolated record from artichoke, they appear to frequent predominantly uncultivated plants and cannot be considered detrimental to agriculture at present.</p><p>Systematic relationships. The dimorphic rostrum and antenna, prominent mandibles with reduced secondary tooth, distally notched scutellum, variably exposed pygidium, and denticulate internal sac are morphological character states of Odontocorynus and various other genera, among which Leptoschoinus Dejean is the type genus of the most senior applicable family-group taxon. Here I transfer Odontocorynus Schönherr from Madopterini, Zygobaridina to Madarini, Leptoschoinina (new placement). The geographic distribution of the species with a denticulate internal sac suggests that Odontocorynus evolved from a hypothetical South American ancestor that may have invaded via an earlier, now submerged land-bridge or otherwise. Donnelly (1985) discusses geological evidence for how such a connection could have formed at the end of the Cretaceous, during an episode of tectonic compression of the Caribbean ‘‘plate’’. At about the same time, a long episode of oceanic transgression into today’s Great Plains ended (Trimble 1980). The current distribution of O. calcarifer and O. pulverulentus seems to be related to habitats that were formed during this time. However, transient characters between Odontocorynus and Central American Leptoschoinus (which will be treated in a separate paper), their generally low degree of diversification, and their absence in the West Indies favor a concept of more recent invasion, via the Panamerican Isthmus. Episodes of cooling and aridification are suggested here as a possible mechanism that led to habitat fragmentation and the prevailing geographic restriction of Odontocorynus to North America.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EDE927D8388B4CC086FEC75A2DFA57	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Prena, Jens	Prena, Jens (2008): Review ofOdontocorynusSchönherr (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Baridinae) with Descriptions of Four New Species. The Coleopterists Bulletin 62 (2): 243-277, DOI: 10.1649/1074.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1649/1074.1
03EDE927D8228B51C0ECFDF55939FB18.text	03EDE927D8228B51C0ECFDF55939FB18.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Odontocorynus subvittatus Casey 1920	<div><p>Odontocorynus subvittatus Casey</p><p>(Fig. 38)</p><p>Odontocorynus subvittatus Casey 1920: 435 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘ Omilteme,/ Guerrero,/ 8000 ft. / elv. H. H. Smi [th]’’, ‘‘ Oi ’’, Champion’s handwriting ‘‘ Odont —/ creperus/ Boh’ ’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37915 ’’, ‘‘subvittatus/ Csy.’’</p><p>Recognition. Casey recognized and distinguished this species from O. creperus based on character states that are not consistently different. All specimens that I have studied are males, and they share with O. creperus the setose fascicle on the first ventrite. These species differ from each other particularly by their suites of specialized setae on the tarsomeres, a trait also present in Leptocorynus aspersus (Champion) and L. scutatus (Champion) . The subvittate, hirsute vestiture supports the identification of O. subvittatus at least in the material studied, but may be sexually dimorphic as in O. latiscapus and O. salebrosus . Females of this complex are difficult to identify in general, and information about female O. subvittatus is unavailable at present.</p><p>Distribution. Central and southern Mexico, localities in Transverse Volcanic Belt and Sierra Madre del Sur (Fig. 38).</p><p>Type locality. Mexico .</p><p>Material examined. MEXICO: Guerrero (USNM 1), Michoacán (CWOB 2), Oaxaca (JPPC 2, TAMU 3). Total 8 specimens .</p><p>Temporal occurrence. Mid July to mid August [3 dates].</p><p>Plant association. None recorded.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EDE927D8228B51C0ECFDF55939FB18	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Prena, Jens	Prena, Jens (2008): Review ofOdontocorynusSchönherr (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Baridinae) with Descriptions of Four New Species. The Coleopterists Bulletin 62 (2): 243-277, DOI: 10.1649/1074.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1649/1074.1
03EDE927D8228B52C0DAFB565960FD83.text	03EDE927D8228B52C0DAFB565960FD83.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Odontocorynus suturaflava Champion	<div><p>Odontocorynus suturaflava Champion</p><p>(Fig. 38)</p><p>Odontocorynus suturaflava Champion 1908: 319 . Syntypes 12: 5 males, 7 females, labeled: (1) ‘‘Type’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘Sp. figured’’, ‘‘ Mexico city / Höge’’; (2) ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘ Mexico / ex/ U.S. N. Mus. ’’; (3) ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘Truqui/ Mexico.’’; (4) ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘ Mexico / Salle Coll.’’, ‘‘PUEBLA’’; ‘‘Odont—/ sutura-flava Ch’’; (5) ‘‘ ♀ ’’, ‘‘ Mexico / Salle Coll.’’, ‘‘PUEBLA’’, ‘‘807’’; (6) ‘‘ ♀ ’’, ‘‘ Mexico / Salle Coll.’’, ‘‘PUEBLA’’; (7) ‘‘ Mexico / Dupt.’’, ‘‘ ♀ ’’, ‘‘Bowring/ 6347*’’, ‘‘sutura-flava/ Chev.’’; (8) ‘‘ Mexico / Dupont’’, ‘‘ ♀ ’’, ‘‘Bowring/ 6347*’’; (9) ‘‘ ♀ ’’, ‘‘Truqui/ Mexico.’’, ‘‘23403’’, ‘‘Fry Coll./ 1905. 100.’’; (10) ‘‘ ♀ ’’, ‘‘ Mexico / Tehuant c ’’, ‘‘ Fry Coll. / 1905. 100.’’; [1–9 with printed label ‘‘ B.C.A. Col. IV.5./</p><p>268 Odontocorynus / sutura-flava,/ Champ.’’, BMNH]; (11) ‘‘Atl[ixco]/ X’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘GCChampion/ determined’’ (USNM 1); (12) ‘‘XI’’, ‘‘ ♀ ’’, ‘‘GCChampion/ determined’’ (USNM 1) .</p><p>Recognition. The species is quite distinct due to the sutural vestiture of yellowish orange scales. Nevertheless, it can be confused easily with similarly colored species in Nicentrus and Geraeus .</p><p>Distribution. Central and southern Mexico, localities in Transverse Volcanic Belt and Sierra Madre del Sur (Fig. 38).</p><p>Type locality. Mexico .</p><p>Material examined. MEXICO: Guerrero (CMNC 1), México D.F. (BMNH 1), Oaxaca (BMNH 1, CMNC 3, JPPC 3), Puebla (BMNH 3, USNM 3), Querétaro (CWOB 1), without site (BMNH 7, USNM 3). Total 26 specimens .</p><p>Temporal occurrence. Mid July to October [4 dates].</p><p>Plant association. Fabaceae: Acacia sp. (3X).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EDE927D8228B52C0DAFB565960FD83	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Prena, Jens	Prena, Jens (2008): Review ofOdontocorynusSchönherr (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Baridinae) with Descriptions of Four New Species. The Coleopterists Bulletin 62 (2): 243-277, DOI: 10.1649/1074.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1649/1074.1
03EDE927D8218B52C060FDCD591CFB13.text	03EDE927D8218B52C060FDCD591CFB13.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Odontocorynus tectus (Champion 2008) Prena 2008	<div><p>Odontocorynus tectus (Champion), new combination</p><p>(Fig. 39)</p><p>Geraeus tectus Champion 1908: 292 . Holotype female, labeled: ‘‘Type’’, ‘‘ ♀ ’’, ‘‘ Oaxaca / Mexico / Hoege’’, ‘‘B.C.A. Col. IV.5./ Geraeus / tectus/ Champ.’’, handwritten ‘‘ Geraeus / tectus/ Cha’’ (BMNH).</p><p>Recognition. Odontocorynus tectus, together with O. townsendi, has the antenna least modified. Of the four males studied, only one showed minor modifications of the club, but all had distal desmomeres with elongate dorsal setae. Odontocorynus histriculus is similar, but has a more elongate body shape, the elytral apices more narrowly rounded, and (in males) the club noticeably modified.</p><p>Distribution. Central and southern Mexico (plus one isolated record from Nuevo León) to Costa Rica (Fig. 39).</p><p>Type locality. Oaxaca, Mexico .</p><p>Material examined. MEXICO: Chiapas (CMNC 1, JPPC 1, UNSM 1), Guerrero (CMNC 1, JPPC 1), Jalisco (CWOB 1, TAMU 2), Michoacán (USNM 1), Morelos (USNM 2), Nayarit (CWOB 2), Nuevo León (TAMU 2), Oaxaca (USNM 1), Puebla (USNM 1) . GUATEMALA: Baja Verapaz (CMNC 4, JPPC 3) . NICARAGUA: Matagalpa (JPPC 1) . COSTA RICA: Puntarenas (CWOB 1) . Total 26 specimens.</p><p>Temporal occurrence. Late May to mid September [13 dates].</p><p>Plant association. None recorded.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EDE927D8218B52C060FDCD591CFB13	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Prena, Jens	Prena, Jens (2008): Review ofOdontocorynusSchönherr (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Baridinae) with Descriptions of Four New Species. The Coleopterists Bulletin 62 (2): 243-277, DOI: 10.1649/1074.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1649/1074.1
03EDE927D8218B53C061FB5D59E6FE34.text	03EDE927D8218B53C061FB5D59E6FE34.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Odontocorynus townsendi (Casey 2008) Prena 2008	<div><p>Odontocorynus townsendi (Casey), new combination</p><p>(Fig. 36)</p><p>Nicentrus townsendi Casey 1920: 446 (in table). Holotype female, labeled: ‘‘ Mex’ ’ [encoded; stands for Sierra Madre, Chihuahua], ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37936 ’’, ‘‘townsendi/ Csy’’ (USNM).</p><p>Recognition. Male O. townsendi have the distal desmomeres very subtly modified and the club not at all; the mandibles have a distinct secondary tooth. All this makes the species rather distinctive within Odontocorynus, but without doubt obscures its generic assignment. Distributional data and gestalt may be useful for preliminary identification, but may need to be confirmed by genitalia dissection. The internal sac is as long as the apodemes, with the basal section with shark-toothed derm and the apical section with numerous anvil-shaped denticles. All specimens studied had the basal lobe of the pronotum as squamose as O. nunume (Fig. 21).</p><p>Distribution. Northern part of Sierra Madre Occidental, from southern Arizona to Durango (Fig. 36).</p><p>Type locality. Sierra Madre Mountains, Chihuahua, Mexico .</p><p>Material examined. MEXICO: Chihuahua (JPPC 1, USNM 1), Durango (AMNH 1), Sonora (JPPC 1) . United States: Arizona (AMNH 2, CMNC 1, CWOB 6, JPPC 2, TAMU 4, USNM 2). Total 21 specimens .</p><p>Temporal occurrence. July to early September [17 dates].</p><p>Plant association. Fagaceae: Quercus sp. [as oak] (1X).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EDE927D8218B53C061FB5D59E6FE34	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Prena, Jens	Prena, Jens (2008): Review ofOdontocorynusSchönherr (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Baridinae) with Descriptions of Four New Species. The Coleopterists Bulletin 62 (2): 243-277, DOI: 10.1649/1074.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1649/1074.1
03EDE927D8208B69C077FDBA5A17FCB9.text	03EDE927D8208B69C077FDBA5A17FCB9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Odontocorynus umbellae (Fabricius 2008) Prena 2008	<div><p>Odontocorynus umbellae (Fabricius), new combination</p><p>(Figs. 3, 14, 18, 23, 27, 34)</p><p>Rhynchaenus umbellae Fabricius 1801: 450 . Holotype male, described from Carolina, labeled: ‘‘LECTOHOLOTYPUS Oi / Rhynchaenus / umbellae F. 1801/ det. E. Colonnelli ’89’’ (ZMUC).</p><p>Ceutorhynchus umbellae . Schönherr (1837).</p><p>Rhinoncus umbellae . Henshaw (1885).</p><p>Campylirhynchus umbellae . O’Brien &amp; Wibmer (1982).</p><p>Baris umbellae . Colonnelli (1993).</p><p>Centrinus scutellumalbum Say 1831: 21 . Lectotype female, here designated, labeled: ‘‘ ♀ ’’, ‘‘Rh: scutellum-/ album. Say./ Pensylv: Say.’’, ‘‘LECTOTY- PUS/ Centrinus / scutellumalbum Say 1831 / Prena design. 2007’’ (NHRS, Schönherr Collection). Paralectotype 1 female, same historic labels as holotype, same depository. New synonymy.</p><p>Baridius scutellumalbum . Germar (in Schönherr 1836).</p><p>Centrinus (Odontocorynus) scutellumalbum . Casey 1892.</p><p>Odontocorynus scutellumalbum . Blatchley &amp; Leng (1916).</p><p>Odontocorynus advena Casey 1920: 414 . Holotype female, labeled: ‘‘Columbia’’, ‘‘nanus/ Schhrr’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37870 ’’, ‘‘advena/ Csy.’’ New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus adjunctus Casey 1920: 415 . Syntypes 6: 3 males, 3 females, labeled: (1) ‘‘R. I.’’ [encoded; stands for Casey farm, Boston Neck, N. Kingston], ‘‘ CASEY / bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘ TYPE USNM/ 37861 ’’, ‘‘adjunctus/ Csy.’’; (2) ‘‘R. I.’’ [encoded as first specimen], ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘adjunctus- 2/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37861 ’’; (3) ‘‘ Southern Pines / A.H. Manee, NC’’, ‘‘ CASEY / bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘adjunctus-3/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37861 ’’; (4) ‘‘ Southern Pines / A.H. Manee, NC’’, ‘‘ Oi ’’, ‘‘ CASEY / bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘adjunctus-4/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37861 ’’; (5) ‘‘ Southern Pines / A.H. Manee, NC’’, ‘‘ Oi ’’, ‘‘ CASEY / bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘adjunctus-5/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37861 ’’; (6) ‘‘ Penn’ ’ [encoded; meaning unresolved], ‘‘ Oi ’’, ‘‘ CASEY / bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘adjunctus-6/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37861 .’’</p><p>New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus amputatus Casey 1920: 417 . Holotype female, labeled: ‘‘N. Y’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37873 ’’, ‘‘amputatus/ Csy.’’.</p><p>New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus atokanus Casey 1920: 412 . Holotype female, labeled: ‘‘Atoka, Ind. T/ June 13.15/ Wickham’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37866 ’’, ‘‘atokanus/ Csy.’’. New synonymy.</p><p>270 Odontocorynus divisus Casey 1920: 415 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘Ind.’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘ CASEY / bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘ TYPE USNM/ 37870 ’’, ‘‘divisus/ Csy.’’. New</p><p>synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus fultoni Casey 1920: 416 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘N. Y’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37864 ’’, ‘‘fultoni/ Csy.’’. New</p><p>synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus illini Casey 1920: 416 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘ N. Ill’ ’, ‘‘ Oi ’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37871 ’’, ‘‘illini/ Csy.’’. New</p><p>synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus incertus Casey 1920: 415 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘ N. America / D. Wehncke’ ’, ‘‘ Oi ’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37863 ’’, ‘‘incertus/ Csy.’’. New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus lineatellus Casey 1920: 413 . Holotype female, labeled: ‘‘St. Louis, Mo.’’, ‘‘ Coreopsis Curculio’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37869’’, ‘‘lineatellus/ Csy.’’. Hustache 1938 (misspelled as O. lineatulus).</p><p>New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus rufobrunneus Casey 1920: 413 . Syntypes 6: 1 male, 5 females, labeled: (1) ‘‘ N. Ill’ ’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37867 ’’, ‘‘rufobrunneus/ Csy. ’’; (2) ‘‘ N. Ill’ ’, ‘‘ Oi ’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘rufobrunneus-2/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37867 ’’; (3) ‘‘ N. Ill’ ’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘rufobrunneus-3/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37867 ’’; (4, 5, and 6) same label as (3) except for individual number which is 4, 5, and 6, repectively. New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus semiruber Casey 1920: 414 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘N. Y’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37868 ’’, ‘‘semiruber/ Csy.’’.</p><p>New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus subabruptus Casey 1920: 417 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘ Long / Island / N. Y.’’, ‘‘ Oi ’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37872 ’’, ‘‘subabruptus/ Csy.’’. New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus subaffinis Casey 1920: 416 . Syntypes 2, male, labeled: (1) ‘‘ Del’ ’ [encoded; stands apparently for Milford, Delaware], ‘‘ Oi ’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37865 ’’, ‘‘subaffinis/ Csy.’’; (2) ‘‘Del’’ [encoded as first specimen], ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘subaffinis-2/ PARATYPE USNM/ 37865.’’ New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus unilineatus Casey 1920: 417 . Holotype female, labeled: ‘‘N. J’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 37874 ’’, ‘‘unilineatus/ Csy.’’.</p><p>New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus amazonicus Casey 1922: 253 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘59’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 45394 ’’, ‘‘ Odontocorynus / amazonicus/ Csy.’’ New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus fluviatilis Casey 1922: 253 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘1003/ 1/ 75’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 45395 ’’, ‘‘fluviatilis/ Csy.’’. New synonymy.</p><p>Odontocorynus glabellus Casey 1922: 254 . Holotype male, labeled: ‘‘1004/ 1/ 75’’, ‘‘Oi’’, ‘‘CASEY/ bequest/ 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM/ 45396 ’’, ‘‘glabrellus [sic]/ Csy.’’. New synonymy.</p><p>Recognition. In general, O. umbellae can be distinguished readily from the other common and widespread North American species, O. salebrosus, by the character states given in the key and the table. Along the southeast shore and in the northern counties of Florida, however, male specimens can be confused with O. calcarifer and O. larvatus . In doubtful cases, O. calcarifer can be separated</p><p>reliably by genital character states. Small, abraded O. umbellae and O. larvatus may not be distinguishable at all without female specimens in the series.</p><p>Type locality. United States, Carolina .</p><p>Distribution. Central and eastern United States and adjacent Canada (Fig. 34).</p><p>Material examined. CANADA: Ontario (CMNC 6, CNCI 24, USNM 1). UNITED STATES: Alabama (CNCI 2, USNM 85), Arkansas (AMNH 4, CNCI 6, CWOB 5, USNM 13), Connecticut (AMNH 28, CNCI 3, CWOB 54, USNM 21), Delaware (USNM 2), District of Columbia (USNM 74), Florida (AMNH 2, CNCI 4, CWOB 70, USNM 12), Georgia (AMNH 52, CNCI 2, USNM 8), Illinois (AMNH 9, CMNC 1, CNCI 1, CWOB 1, USNM 8), Indiana (CWOB 6, USNM 34), Iowa (USNM 8), Kentucky (CNCI 1), Louisiana (CNCI 9, CWOB 23, USNM 6), Maryland (CMNC 1, CNCI 3, CWOB 5, USNM 186), Massachusetts (AMNH 6, CMNC 4, CNCI 17, CWOB 8, UNSM 6, USNM 46), Michigan (CWOB 3, UNSM 1, USNM 32), Minnesota (CWOB 2, USNM 10), Mississippi (AMNH 1, CWOB 3, USNM 22), Missouri (CWOB 15, TAMU 11, USNM 13), New Hampshire (USNM 1), New Jersey (AMNH 85, CMNC 2, CNCI 100, UNSM 1, USNM 182), New York (AMNH 203, CWOB 10, USNM 33), North Carolina (AMNH 16, CMNC 9, CWOB 14, USNM 1), Ohio (CMNC 1, CWOB 12, USNM 2), Oklahoma (CNCI 12, CWOB 8, TAMU 9, USNM 48), Pennsylvania (AMNH 6, CNCI 16, USNM 17), Rhode Island (USNM 2), South Carolina (CNCI 3, CWOB 3, JCCC 17, USNM 7), Tennessee (CMNC 1, CWOB 4, USNM 2), Texas (AMNH 1, CMNC 6, CNCI 9, CWOB 20, USNM 108), Vermont (AMNH 1, USNM 4), Virginia (CMNC 13, CNCI 6, CWOB 3, USNM 113), West Virginia (CWOB 8, USNM 1), Wisconsin (AMNH 1, CWOB 8, USNM 4). Total 1882 specimens.</p><p>Temporal occurrence. Mid May to early September.</p><p>Plant association. Anacardiaceae: Rhus typhina (11X). Asclepiadaceae: Asclepias sp. (5X), A. tuberosa (1X). Asteraceae: Achillea millefolium (4X), Aphanostephus skirrhobasis (1X), Aster sp. (3X), Coreopsis sp. (1X), Eupatorium perfoliatum (1X), Helenium amarum [as. H. tenuifolium] (4X), Helianthus annuus [as sunflower] (2X), Heterotheca subaxillaris (1X), Leucanthemum vulgare [as Chrysanthemum leucanthemum] (15X), Rudbeckia amplexicaulis (3X), R. hirta (44X), R. serotina (6X), Solidago sp. (11X), Valesina helianthoides (2X), ‘‘daisy’’ (16X). Fabaceae: Cassia sp. (1X), Melilotus sp. (2X). Lamiaceae: Satureia hortensis (2X).</p><p>Nomenclatural notes. This species usually has been identified as O. scutellumalbum (Say) in collections. Say (1831) stated in the description that the series was taken in Pennsylvania, Indiana, and Missouri, and mentioned Arkansas as provenance of a variety. He adopted the epithet from Knoch in litt. (in Melsheimer 1806) who, according to an annotation in Melsheimer’s personal copy made by his son, actually referred to Anthonomus suturalis . Say distinguished varieties A and C, but did not refer to variety B in the description. Two species of Odontocorynus from the above localities match the description. Of particular interest is the statement under variety A, ‘‘rostrum is more recti-linear towards the tip.’’ From this it may be deduced that variety A is O. umbellae and the remainder possibly O. salebrosus . The current usage of the name is that of Casey (1892), who interpreted Centrinus scutellumalbum in the sense of O. umbellae . This view was adopted by Blatchley &amp; Leng (1916), Casey (1920), and O’Brien &amp; Wibmer (1984). The remnants of the Say Collection do not include any C. scutellumalbum (see Mawdsley 1993). Material in American and European historic collections shows that contemporary collectors (including Say) did not</p><p>272 274 distinguish between O. umbellae and O. salebrosus . A specimen in the Harris Collection (MCZ) identified by Say in 1834 is O. salebrosus . It was labeled as type of C. scutellumalbum by museum staff, but there is no evidence that it belonged to the original series. In the LeConte Collection (MCZ) are five specimens without collecting data, the first three (including the labeled specimen) being O. salebrosus, the others O. umbellae . Five specimens in the Horn Collection (MCZ) are O. umbellae . Casey’s specimens (USNM) all are O. umbellae . The historic series #37600 at the MNHUB includes seven O. umbellae and four O. salebrosus . I have not examined the specimens of the Germar Collection, because none shows evidence of coming from Say (K. Schneider, in litt.); Germar (in Schönherr 1836: 730) mentioned Carolina, and specimens with this origin cannot by syntypes of C. scutellumalbum . Only two specimens, deposited in the Schönherr Collection, have evidence that they were syntypes. They are female, pinned and labeled the same way, with provenance Pennsylvania. According to the loan invoice, one is Germar’s nominal form; the other is Germar’s variety beta (in Schönherr 1836: 730). To accomplish stability of the name, I here designate the darker specimen as lectotype of Centrinus scutellumalbum . The paralectotype is slightly more reddish and lacks the left antenna and the right funicle.</p><p>Rhynchaenus umbellae Fabricius is an available and valid name for C. scutellumalbum . The species was catalogued under Ceutorhynchinae (e.g., Schönherr 1837, 1845; Melsheimer 1853; Gemminger &amp; Harold 1871; Crotch 1873; Henshaw 1885; Leng 1920; O’Brien &amp; Wibmer 1982), before Colonnelli (1993) transferred it to the Baridinae. Because the name has been used as valid after 1899, it is not a nomen oblitum. Rhynchaenus umbellae is transferred here to Odontocorynus, as O. umbellae (Fabricius) new combination, and placed in synonymy with O. scutellumalbum and 17 other species described by Casey (1920, 1922). Somewhat amazing is Casey’s (1922) record of three Odontocorynus from Santarem in Brazil, particularly as he noted that they look as if collected in Pennsylvania. They bear handwritten labels with numbers used for preliminary sorting, but no collecting data. All of them are typical O. umbellae . I found no evidence that a species of Odontocorynus, as understood here, occurs in South America.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EDE927D8208B69C077FDBA5A17FCB9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Prena, Jens	Prena, Jens (2008): Review ofOdontocorynusSchönherr (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Baridinae) with Descriptions of Four New Species. The Coleopterists Bulletin 62 (2): 243-277, DOI: 10.1649/1074.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1649/1074.1
