taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03EB87A7A871FF994CAE7AB3FE99FB9E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3999750/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3999750	Figure 1. Locharcha opportuna adult, dorsal view: (A) wings spread, pinned; (B) head and thorax, in detail; (C) wings folded, on Tibouchina sellowiana leaf. Scale bars = 2, 1 and 2 mm, respectively.	Figure 1. Locharcha opportuna adult, dorsal view: (A) wings spread, pinned; (B) head and thorax, in detail; (C) wings folded, on Tibouchina sellowiana leaf. Scale bars = 2, 1 and 2 mm, respectively.	2015-02-28	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.		Zenodo	biologists	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.			
03EB87A7A871FF994CAE7AB3FE99FB9E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3999752/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3999752	Figure 2. Locharcha opportuna adult morphology: (A) wings; (B) male genitalia (arrow indicates glandiductor), lateral view; (C) female genitalia, lateral view; (D) detail of tergal process (asterisk), dorsal view. Scale bars = 1, 0.2 and 0.5 mm, respectively.	Figure 2. Locharcha opportuna adult morphology: (A) wings; (B) male genitalia (arrow indicates glandiductor), lateral view; (C) female genitalia, lateral view; (D) detail of tergal process (asterisk), dorsal view. Scale bars = 1, 0.2 and 0.5 mm, respectively.	2015-02-28	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.		Zenodo	biologists	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.			
03EB87A7A871FF994CAE7AB3FE99FB9E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3999756/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3999756	Figure 3. Male genital morphology of Locharcha opportuna under light and scanning electron microscopy: (A) genitalia (aedeagus removed), oblique view (slide preparation GRPM 50–63); (B) gnathos, lateral view; (C) left valve (= glandiductor) detached from tegumen, lateral view; (D) sicae with anchored aedeagus (pointed by arrow), lateroposterior view; (E) dissected aedeagus (asterisk indicates everted vesica), lateral view. Scale bars = 1 mm, 50, 100, 100, 200 µm, respectively.	Figure 3. Male genital morphology of Locharcha opportuna under light and scanning electron microscopy: (A) genitalia (aedeagus removed), oblique view (slide preparation GRPM 50–63); (B) gnathos, lateral view; (C) left valve (= glandiductor) detached from tegumen, lateral view; (D) sicae with anchored aedeagus (pointed by arrow), lateroposterior view; (E) dissected aedeagus (asterisk indicates everted vesica), lateral view. Scale bars = 1 mm, 50, 100, 100, 200 µm, respectively.	2015-02-28	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.		Zenodo	biologists	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.			
03EB87A7A871FF994CAE7AB3FE99FB9E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3999758/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3999758	Figure 4. Female genital morphology of Locharcha opportuna under light microscopy: (A) genitalia, oblique view (slide preparation GRPM 50–65); (B) female signum, internal view. Scale bars = 250 and 500 µm, respectively.	Figure 4. Female genital morphology of Locharcha opportuna under light microscopy: (A) genitalia, oblique view (slide preparation GRPM 50–65); (B) female signum, internal view. Scale bars = 250 and 500 µm, respectively.	2015-02-28	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.		Zenodo	biologists	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.			
03EB87A7A871FF994CAE7AB3FE99FB9E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3999760/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3999760	Figure 5. Locharcha opportuna last larval instar: (A) head chaetotaxy, frontal view; (B) thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy, lateral view; (C) head and prothoracic shield, dorsal view; (D) body, lateral view. Scale bars = 50 µm and 1 mm, respectively.	Figure 5. Locharcha opportuna last larval instar: (A) head chaetotaxy, frontal view; (B) thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy, lateral view; (C) head and prothoracic shield, dorsal view; (D) body, lateral view. Scale bars = 50 µm and 1 mm, respectively.	2015-02-28	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.		Zenodo	biologists	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.			
03EB87A7A871FF994CAE7AB3FE99FB9E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3999762/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3999762	Figure 6. Scanning electron micrographs of Locharcha opportuna last larval instar: (A) head and prothorax, lateral view; (B) labrum and mandibles, frontal view; (C) stemmata; (D) antenna, lateral view; (E) labium and spinneret, ventral view; (F) maxilla, anterolateral view; (G) distal portion of mesothoracic leg, posterolateral view (arrow indicates spatulate seta); (H) prothoracic spiracle, lateral view; (I) pseudopodium abdominal A6, mesoventral view. Scale bars = 200, 100, 100, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 100 µm, respectively.	Figure 6. Scanning electron micrographs of Locharcha opportuna last larval instar: (A) head and prothorax, lateral view; (B) labrum and mandibles, frontal view; (C) stemmata; (D) antenna, lateral view; (E) labium and spinneret, ventral view; (F) maxilla, anterolateral view; (G) distal portion of mesothoracic leg, posterolateral view (arrow indicates spatulate seta); (H) prothoracic spiracle, lateral view; (I) pseudopodium abdominal A6, mesoventral view. Scale bars = 200, 100, 100, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 100 µm, respectively.	2015-02-28	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.		Zenodo	biologists	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.			
03EB87A7A871FF994CAE7AB3FE99FB9E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3999764/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3999764	Figure 7. Locharcha opportuna pupa, in dorsal (A), ventral (B) and lateral (C) views, respectively. Scale bar = 1 mm.	Figure 7. Locharcha opportuna pupa, in dorsal (A), ventral (B) and lateral (C) views, respectively. Scale bar = 1 mm.	2015-02-28	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.		Zenodo	biologists	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.			
03EB87A7A871FF994CAE7AB3FE99FB9E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3999766/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3999766	Figure 8. Scanning electron micrographs of Locharcha opportuna pupa: (A) clypeal and mandibular areas (open arrows indicate microsetae), ventral view; (B) abdominal segments seven and eight (small arrow and arrow head indicate abdominal spiracles seven and eight, respectively), laterodorsal view; (C) microtrichia of abdominal segment A5, dorsolateral view; (D) setae of seventh abdominal segment posterior margin, dorsal view; (E) pseudopodium scar of abdominal segment A6, ventral view; (F) distal portion of abdomen, dorsal view; (G) apical portion of cremaster seta, dorsolateral view. Scale bars = 50, 100, 10, 20, 50, 100, 10 µm, respectively.	Figure 8. Scanning electron micrographs of Locharcha opportuna pupa: (A) clypeal and mandibular areas (open arrows indicate microsetae), ventral view; (B) abdominal segments seven and eight (small arrow and arrow head indicate abdominal spiracles seven and eight, respectively), laterodorsal view; (C) microtrichia of abdominal segment A5, dorsolateral view; (D) setae of seventh abdominal segment posterior margin, dorsal view; (E) pseudopodium scar of abdominal segment A6, ventral view; (F) distal portion of abdomen, dorsal view; (G) apical portion of cremaster seta, dorsolateral view. Scale bars = 50, 100, 10, 20, 50, 100, 10 µm, respectively.	2015-02-28	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.		Zenodo	biologists	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.			
03EB87A7A871FF994CAE7AB3FE99FB9E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3999768/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3999768	Figure 9. Bayesian inference tree for the new genus, based on 621 bp of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase c subunit I gene (CO-I). Numbers above branches indicate support values> 0.8/60 for Bayesian posterior probability (BPP)/bootstrap – for maximum likelihood (ML); those located below represent the percentage of evolutionary divergence between clades. Asterisk indicates support <0.80/60 for BPP and ML, respectively.	Figure 9. Bayesian inference tree for the new genus, based on 621 bp of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase c subunit I gene (CO-I). Numbers above branches indicate support values> 0.8/60 for Bayesian posterior probability (BPP)/bootstrap – for maximum likelihood (ML); those located below represent the percentage of evolutionary divergence between clades. Asterisk indicates support <0.80/60 for BPP and ML, respectively.	2015-02-28	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.		Zenodo	biologists	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.			
03EB87A7A871FF994CAE7AB3FE99FB9E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3999770/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3999770	Figure 10. Galls induced by Palaeomystella fernandesi on Tibouchina sellowiana plants, free from (A–D) and attacked by (E–H) the kleptoparasite Locharcha opportuna. (A) general aspect of two young, green galls inhabited by cecidogenous larvae, as indicated by the absence of external orifices; (B) dissected gall showing a cecidogenous larva inside; (C) dehiscent, violet gall on the ground, bearing a cecidogenous late-instar larva; (D) operculum (indicated by closed arrow) made by a last instar of the cecidogenous larva on a dehiscent gall before pupation, external view; (E) violet gall inhabited by a kleptoparasite larva, as indicated by the presence of two orifices (open arrows); (F) dissected gall showing a kleptoparasite larva inside; (G) dissected gall showing a kleptoparasite pupal cocoon inside (covered by larval faecal pellets, indicated by asterisk); (H) old, empty gall, left attached to a T. sellowiana plant after the kleptoparasite emergence. Scale bars = 4, 2, 2, 2, 4, 4, 4, 4 mm, respectively.	Figure 10. Galls induced by Palaeomystella fernandesi on Tibouchina sellowiana plants, free from (A–D) and attacked by (E–H) the kleptoparasite Locharcha opportuna. (A) general aspect of two young, green galls inhabited by cecidogenous larvae, as indicated by the absence of external orifices; (B) dissected gall showing a cecidogenous larva inside; (C) dehiscent, violet gall on the ground, bearing a cecidogenous late-instar larva; (D) operculum (indicated by closed arrow) made by a last instar of the cecidogenous larva on a dehiscent gall before pupation, external view; (E) violet gall inhabited by a kleptoparasite larva, as indicated by the presence of two orifices (open arrows); (F) dissected gall showing a kleptoparasite larva inside; (G) dissected gall showing a kleptoparasite pupal cocoon inside (covered by larval faecal pellets, indicated by asterisk); (H) old, empty gall, left attached to a T. sellowiana plant after the kleptoparasite emergence. Scale bars = 4, 2, 2, 2, 4, 4, 4, 4 mm, respectively.	2015-02-28	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.		Zenodo	biologists	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.			
03EB87A7A871FF994CAE7AB3FE99FB9E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3999772/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3999772	Figure 11. Variation in green colour intensity of Tibouchina sellowiana galls (median and corresponding quartiles) in relation to larval ontogeny, when considered the presence of larva either of the cecidogenous insect (A; = 10, 81 and 64 individuals, respectively, for instar II to IV) or the kleptoparasite (B; = 29, 38, 32, 64 individuals, respectively for instars I to IV) larvae inside. Bars followed by the same letter do not differ statistically (Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison tests).	Figure 11. Variation in green colour intensity of Tibouchina sellowiana galls (median and corresponding quartiles) in relation to larval ontogeny, when considered the presence of larva either of the cecidogenous insect (A; = 10, 81 and 64 individuals, respectively, for instar II to IV) or the kleptoparasite (B; = 29, 38, 32, 64 individuals, respectively for instars I to IV) larvae inside. Bars followed by the same letter do not differ statistically (Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison tests).	2015-02-28	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.		Zenodo	biologists	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.			
03EB87A7A871FF994CAE7AB3FE99FB9E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3999774/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3999774	Figure 12. Variation in colour and size among galls induced by Palaeomystella fernandesi on Tibouchina sellowiana plants, and corresponding use by either cecidogenous or kleptoparasite moths at CPCN Pró-Mata (April 2012 to June 2013). (A) Gradient from green- to violetcoloured for galls that were studied; (B, C) abundance of cecidogenous larvae (closed bars; total = 155 individuals) and kleptoparasite (open bars; total = 163 individuals) inside in relation to intensity of green colour and size of green galls, respectively; (D) linear regression between size and intensity of green colour on galls (y = 0.67x + 8.77, R2 = 0.152, p <0.0001, n = 348).	Figure 12. Variation in colour and size among galls induced by Palaeomystella fernandesi on Tibouchina sellowiana plants, and corresponding use by either cecidogenous or kleptoparasite moths at CPCN Pró-Mata (April 2012 to June 2013). (A) Gradient from green- to violetcoloured for galls that were studied; (B, C) abundance of cecidogenous larvae (closed bars; total = 155 individuals) and kleptoparasite (open bars; total = 163 individuals) inside in relation to intensity of green colour and size of green galls, respectively; (D) linear regression between size and intensity of green colour on galls (y = 0.67x + 8.77, R2 = 0.152, p <0.0001, n = 348).	2015-02-28	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.		Zenodo	biologists	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.			
03EB87A7A871FF994CAE7AB3FE99FB9E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3999776/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3999776	Figure 13. Seasonal abundance of cecidogenous (Palaeomystella fernandesi, dashed line) and kleptoparasite (Locharcha opportuna, solid line) larvae in galls (total = 164 and 169 individuals, respectively) induced on Tibouchina sellowiana plants at CPCN Pró-Mata, from April 2012 through June 2013. Arabic numbers from 1 to 14 represent 30-day sampling intervals. Upper horizontal bars indicate host plant phenological phases: red, flowering; green, fruiting; blue, dormancy; black, forming new shoots.	Figure 13. Seasonal abundance of cecidogenous (Palaeomystella fernandesi, dashed line) and kleptoparasite (Locharcha opportuna, solid line) larvae in galls (total = 164 and 169 individuals, respectively) induced on Tibouchina sellowiana plants at CPCN Pró-Mata, from April 2012 through June 2013. Arabic numbers from 1 to 14 represent 30-day sampling intervals. Upper horizontal bars indicate host plant phenological phases: red, flowering; green, fruiting; blue, dormancy; black, forming new shoots.	2015-02-28	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.		Zenodo	biologists	Luz, Fernando A.;Gonçalves, Gislene L.;Moreira, Gilson R. P.;Becker, Vitor O.			
