taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03EB87AEFFF4FFA2DF958485FD6A2B58.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143432/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143432	Fig. 2. Line drawings of Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor). A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.6 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9011); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9010) with position of sections labeled (uterus not shown); D – section of mature proglottid at level of testes (LRP 9037); E – section of mature proglottid posterior to ovarian bridge (LRP 9030).	Fig. 2. Line drawings of Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor). A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.6 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9011); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9010) with position of sections labeled (uterus not shown); D – section of mature proglottid at level of testes (LRP 9037); E – section of mature proglottid posterior to ovarian bridge (LRP 9030).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFF4FFA2DF958485FD6A2B58.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143438/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143438	Fig. 4. Line drawings of Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura heterura (Bleeker). A – whole worm (LRP 9046); B – scolex (holotype, MZUM [P] 2016.9 [H]); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9046).	Fig. 4. Line drawings of Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura heterura (Bleeker). A – whole worm (LRP 9046); B – scolex (holotype, MZUM [P] 2016.9 [H]); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9046).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFF4FFA2DF958485FD6A2B58.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143442/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143442	Fig. 6. Line drawings of Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides. A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.11 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9066); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9067).	Fig. 6. Line drawings of Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides. A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.11 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9066); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9067).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFF4FFA2DF958485FD6A2B58.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143446/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143446	Fig. 8. Line drawings of Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Yearsley. A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.13 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9092); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9088).	Fig. 8. Line drawings of Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Yearsley. A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.13 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9092); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9088).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFF4FFA2DF958485FD6A2B58.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143450/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143450	Fig. 10. Line drawings of Stillabothrium jeanfortiae sp. n. from Himantura australis Last, White et Naylor. A – whole worm (holotype; QM G235198); B – scolex (LRP 9123); C – terminal proglottid (holotype; QM 235198).	Fig. 10. Line drawings of Stillabothrium jeanfortiae sp. n. from Himantura australis Last, White et Naylor. A – whole worm (holotype; QM G235198); B – scolex (LRP 9123); C – terminal proglottid (holotype; QM 235198).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFF4FFA2DF958485FD6A2B58.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143454/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143454	Fig. 12. Line drawings of Stillabothrium cadenati comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle). A – whole worm (LRP 9135); B – bothridium (LRP 9134); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9136).	Fig. 12. Line drawings of Stillabothrium cadenati comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle). A – whole worm (LRP 9135); B – bothridium (LRP 9134); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9136).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFF4FFA2DF958485FD6A2B58.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143460/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143460	Fig. 15. Line drawing of bothridium of the holotype (QM GL4621) of Stillabothrium amuletum (Butler, 1987) comb. n. from Glaucostegus typus [Anonymous (Bennett)].	Fig. 15. Line drawing of bothridium of the holotype (QM GL4621) of Stillabothrium amuletum (Butler, 1987) comb. n. from Glaucostegus typus [Anonymous (Bennett)].	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFF4FFA2DF958485FD6A2B58.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143456/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143456	Fig. 13. Histological sections through bothridium of Stillabothrium cadenati (Euzet, 1954) comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle). Arrows indicate divisions between proximal and distal portions of transverse septa. Abbreviations: ATS – an- teriormost transverse septum; IV – intestinal villus; RM – radial musculature; RTS – reduced transverse septum; SM – septal mus- culature; ST – stalk; TM – transverse muscle bundle.	Fig. 13. Histological sections through bothridium of Stillabothrium cadenati (Euzet, 1954) comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle). Arrows indicate divisions between proximal and distal portions of transverse septa. Abbreviations: ATS – an- teriormost transverse septum; IV – intestinal villus; RM – radial musculature; RTS – reduced transverse septum; SM – septal mus- culature; ST – stalk; TM – transverse muscle bundle.	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFF2FFA0DF958145FD9D2ED7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143430/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143430	Fig. 1. Phylogram based on Bayesian analysis of 1084 bp region of D1–D3 28S rDNA. Numbers above branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities, numbers below indicate Bootstrap percentage values, based on 1000 replicates. Scale indicates expected num- ber of substitutions per site. Diagrammatic line drawings of fully opened bothridia of the seven described species mapped onto the clades representing those respective species. Host species information in Table 1.	Fig. 1. Phylogram based on Bayesian analysis of 1084 bp region of D1–D3 28S rDNA. Numbers above branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities, numbers below indicate Bootstrap percentage values, based on 1000 replicates. Scale indicates expected num- ber of substitutions per site. Diagrammatic line drawings of fully opened bothridia of the seven described species mapped onto the clades representing those respective species. Host species information in Table 1.	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFF2FFA0DF958145FD9D2ED7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143432/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143432	Fig. 2. Line drawings of Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor). A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.6 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9011); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9010) with position of sections labeled (uterus not shown); D – section of mature proglottid at level of testes (LRP 9037); E – section of mature proglottid posterior to ovarian bridge (LRP 9030).	Fig. 2. Line drawings of Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor). A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.6 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9011); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9010) with position of sections labeled (uterus not shown); D – section of mature proglottid at level of testes (LRP 9037); E – section of mature proglottid posterior to ovarian bridge (LRP 9030).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFF2FFA0DF958145FD9D2ED7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143434/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143434	Fig. 3. Scanning electron micrographs of Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor). A–C – scoleces, letters indicate locations of other SEMs; D – distal bothridial surface at anterior loculus; E – proximal bothridial surface and rim, letter indicates location of F; F – proximal bothridial surface; G – stalk; H – strobila.	Fig. 3. Scanning electron micrographs of Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor). A–C – scoleces, letters indicate locations of other SEMs; D – distal bothridial surface at anterior loculus; E – proximal bothridial surface and rim, letter indicates location of F; F – proximal bothridial surface; G – stalk; H – strobila.	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFF2FFA0DF958145FD9D2ED7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143462/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143462	Fig. 16. Light micrographs of terminal genitalia of Stillabothrium species, each with genital pore oriented left. A – Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor); B – Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura gerrardi (Gray); C – Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides; D – Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Yearsley; E – Stillabothrium jeanfortiae sp. n. from Himantura australis Last, White et Naylor; F – Stillabothrium cadenati comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle).	Fig. 16. Light micrographs of terminal genitalia of Stillabothrium species, each with genital pore oriented left. A – Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor); B – Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura gerrardi (Gray); C – Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides; D – Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Yearsley; E – Stillabothrium jeanfortiae sp. n. from Himantura australis Last, White et Naylor; F – Stillabothrium cadenati comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFF0FFADDF9584C5FE632C37.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143430/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143430	Fig. 1. Phylogram based on Bayesian analysis of 1084 bp region of D1–D3 28S rDNA. Numbers above branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities, numbers below indicate Bootstrap percentage values, based on 1000 replicates. Scale indicates expected num- ber of substitutions per site. Diagrammatic line drawings of fully opened bothridia of the seven described species mapped onto the clades representing those respective species. Host species information in Table 1.	Fig. 1. Phylogram based on Bayesian analysis of 1084 bp region of D1–D3 28S rDNA. Numbers above branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities, numbers below indicate Bootstrap percentage values, based on 1000 replicates. Scale indicates expected num- ber of substitutions per site. Diagrammatic line drawings of fully opened bothridia of the seven described species mapped onto the clades representing those respective species. Host species information in Table 1.	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFF0FFADDF9584C5FE632C37.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143438/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143438	Fig. 4. Line drawings of Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura heterura (Bleeker). A – whole worm (LRP 9046); B – scolex (holotype, MZUM [P] 2016.9 [H]); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9046).	Fig. 4. Line drawings of Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura heterura (Bleeker). A – whole worm (LRP 9046); B – scolex (holotype, MZUM [P] 2016.9 [H]); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9046).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFF0FFADDF9584C5FE632C37.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143440/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143440	Fig. 5. Scanning electron micrographs of Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura uarnak 3 (A, C, F) and Himantura heterura (Bleeker) (B, D, E, G). A, B – scoleces, letters indicate locations of other SEMs; C – distal bothridial surface in center of loc- ulus; D – proximal bothridial surface with rim; E – proximal bothridial surface near rim; F – proximal bothridial surface; G – strobila.	Fig. 5. Scanning electron micrographs of Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura uarnak 3 (A, C, F) and Himantura heterura (Bleeker) (B, D, E, G). A, B – scoleces, letters indicate locations of other SEMs; C – distal bothridial surface in center of loc- ulus; D – proximal bothridial surface with rim; E – proximal bothridial surface near rim; F – proximal bothridial surface; G – strobila.	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFF0FFADDF9584C5FE632C37.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143462/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143462	Fig. 16. Light micrographs of terminal genitalia of Stillabothrium species, each with genital pore oriented left. A – Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor); B – Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura gerrardi (Gray); C – Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides; D – Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Yearsley; E – Stillabothrium jeanfortiae sp. n. from Himantura australis Last, White et Naylor; F – Stillabothrium cadenati comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle).	Fig. 16. Light micrographs of terminal genitalia of Stillabothrium species, each with genital pore oriented left. A – Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor); B – Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura gerrardi (Gray); C – Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides; D – Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Yearsley; E – Stillabothrium jeanfortiae sp. n. from Himantura australis Last, White et Naylor; F – Stillabothrium cadenati comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFFDFFAADF958665FD9D2ED7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143430/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143430	Fig. 1. Phylogram based on Bayesian analysis of 1084 bp region of D1–D3 28S rDNA. Numbers above branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities, numbers below indicate Bootstrap percentage values, based on 1000 replicates. Scale indicates expected num- ber of substitutions per site. Diagrammatic line drawings of fully opened bothridia of the seven described species mapped onto the clades representing those respective species. Host species information in Table 1.	Fig. 1. Phylogram based on Bayesian analysis of 1084 bp region of D1–D3 28S rDNA. Numbers above branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities, numbers below indicate Bootstrap percentage values, based on 1000 replicates. Scale indicates expected num- ber of substitutions per site. Diagrammatic line drawings of fully opened bothridia of the seven described species mapped onto the clades representing those respective species. Host species information in Table 1.	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFFDFFAADF958665FD9D2ED7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143442/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143442	Fig. 6. Line drawings of Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides. A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.11 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9066); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9067).	Fig. 6. Line drawings of Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides. A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.11 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9066); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9067).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFFDFFAADF958665FD9D2ED7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143444/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143444	Fig. 7. Scanning electron micrographs of Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides. A – scolex; letters indicate locations of other SEMs; B – bothridium; C – distal bothridial surface at third loculus (upper half) and transverse septum (lower half); D – proximal bothridial surface with rim; E – proximal bothridial surface near rim; F – strobila. White arrowheads indicate cilia in Fig. 7C,D.	Fig. 7. Scanning electron micrographs of Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides. A – scolex; letters indicate locations of other SEMs; B – bothridium; C – distal bothridial surface at third loculus (upper half) and transverse septum (lower half); D – proximal bothridial surface with rim; E – proximal bothridial surface near rim; F – strobila. White arrowheads indicate cilia in Fig. 7C,D.	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFFDFFAADF958665FD9D2ED7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143462/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143462	Fig. 16. Light micrographs of terminal genitalia of Stillabothrium species, each with genital pore oriented left. A – Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor); B – Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura gerrardi (Gray); C – Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides; D – Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Yearsley; E – Stillabothrium jeanfortiae sp. n. from Himantura australis Last, White et Naylor; F – Stillabothrium cadenati comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle).	Fig. 16. Light micrographs of terminal genitalia of Stillabothrium species, each with genital pore oriented left. A – Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor); B – Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura gerrardi (Gray); C – Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides; D – Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Yearsley; E – Stillabothrium jeanfortiae sp. n. from Himantura australis Last, White et Naylor; F – Stillabothrium cadenati comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFFDFFAADF958665FD9D2ED7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143432/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143432	Fig. 2. Line drawings of Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor). A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.6 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9011); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9010) with position of sections labeled (uterus not shown); D – section of mature proglottid at level of testes (LRP 9037); E – section of mature proglottid posterior to ovarian bridge (LRP 9030).	Fig. 2. Line drawings of Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor). A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.6 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9011); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9010) with position of sections labeled (uterus not shown); D – section of mature proglottid at level of testes (LRP 9037); E – section of mature proglottid posterior to ovarian bridge (LRP 9030).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFFDFFAADF958665FD9D2ED7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143438/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143438	Fig. 4. Line drawings of Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura heterura (Bleeker). A – whole worm (LRP 9046); B – scolex (holotype, MZUM [P] 2016.9 [H]); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9046).	Fig. 4. Line drawings of Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura heterura (Bleeker). A – whole worm (LRP 9046); B – scolex (holotype, MZUM [P] 2016.9 [H]); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9046).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFFAFFA8DF9584C5FB592D37.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143430/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143430	Fig. 1. Phylogram based on Bayesian analysis of 1084 bp region of D1–D3 28S rDNA. Numbers above branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities, numbers below indicate Bootstrap percentage values, based on 1000 replicates. Scale indicates expected num- ber of substitutions per site. Diagrammatic line drawings of fully opened bothridia of the seven described species mapped onto the clades representing those respective species. Host species information in Table 1.	Fig. 1. Phylogram based on Bayesian analysis of 1084 bp region of D1–D3 28S rDNA. Numbers above branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities, numbers below indicate Bootstrap percentage values, based on 1000 replicates. Scale indicates expected num- ber of substitutions per site. Diagrammatic line drawings of fully opened bothridia of the seven described species mapped onto the clades representing those respective species. Host species information in Table 1.	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFFAFFA8DF9584C5FB592D37.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143446/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143446	Fig. 8. Line drawings of Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Yearsley. A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.13 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9092); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9088).	Fig. 8. Line drawings of Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Yearsley. A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.13 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9092); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9088).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFFAFFA8DF9584C5FB592D37.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143448/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143448	Fig. 9. Scanning electron micrographs of Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Years- ley. A – scolex; letters indicate locations of other SEMs; B – distal bothridial surface at second loculus and transverse septum; C, D – proximal bothridial surface with rim; E – proximal bothridial surface near rim; F – proximal bothridial surface; G – strobila.	Fig. 9. Scanning electron micrographs of Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Years- ley. A – scolex; letters indicate locations of other SEMs; B – distal bothridial surface at second loculus and transverse septum; C, D – proximal bothridial surface with rim; E – proximal bothridial surface near rim; F – proximal bothridial surface; G – strobila.	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFFAFFA8DF9584C5FB592D37.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143462/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143462	Fig. 16. Light micrographs of terminal genitalia of Stillabothrium species, each with genital pore oriented left. A – Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor); B – Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura gerrardi (Gray); C – Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides; D – Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Yearsley; E – Stillabothrium jeanfortiae sp. n. from Himantura australis Last, White et Naylor; F – Stillabothrium cadenati comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle).	Fig. 16. Light micrographs of terminal genitalia of Stillabothrium species, each with genital pore oriented left. A – Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor); B – Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura gerrardi (Gray); C – Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides; D – Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Yearsley; E – Stillabothrium jeanfortiae sp. n. from Himantura australis Last, White et Naylor; F – Stillabothrium cadenati comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFFAFFA8DF9584C5FB592D37.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143442/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143442	Fig. 6. Line drawings of Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides. A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.11 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9066); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9067).	Fig. 6. Line drawings of Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides. A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.11 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9066); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9067).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFFAFFA8DF9584C5FB592D37.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143438/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143438	Fig. 4. Line drawings of Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura heterura (Bleeker). A – whole worm (LRP 9046); B – scolex (holotype, MZUM [P] 2016.9 [H]); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9046).	Fig. 4. Line drawings of Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura heterura (Bleeker). A – whole worm (LRP 9046); B – scolex (holotype, MZUM [P] 2016.9 [H]); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9046).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFF8FFB5DC2F8765FD6C2E37.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143430/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143430	Fig. 1. Phylogram based on Bayesian analysis of 1084 bp region of D1–D3 28S rDNA. Numbers above branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities, numbers below indicate Bootstrap percentage values, based on 1000 replicates. Scale indicates expected num- ber of substitutions per site. Diagrammatic line drawings of fully opened bothridia of the seven described species mapped onto the clades representing those respective species. Host species information in Table 1.	Fig. 1. Phylogram based on Bayesian analysis of 1084 bp region of D1–D3 28S rDNA. Numbers above branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities, numbers below indicate Bootstrap percentage values, based on 1000 replicates. Scale indicates expected num- ber of substitutions per site. Diagrammatic line drawings of fully opened bothridia of the seven described species mapped onto the clades representing those respective species. Host species information in Table 1.	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFF8FFB5DC2F8765FD6C2E37.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143450/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143450	Fig. 10. Line drawings of Stillabothrium jeanfortiae sp. n. from Himantura australis Last, White et Naylor. A – whole worm (holotype; QM G235198); B – scolex (LRP 9123); C – terminal proglottid (holotype; QM 235198).	Fig. 10. Line drawings of Stillabothrium jeanfortiae sp. n. from Himantura australis Last, White et Naylor. A – whole worm (holotype; QM G235198); B – scolex (LRP 9123); C – terminal proglottid (holotype; QM 235198).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFF8FFB5DC2F8765FD6C2E37.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143452/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143452	Fig. 11. Scanning electron micrographs of Stillabothrium jeanfortiae sp. n. from Himantura australis Last, White et Naylor. A – scolex; letters indicate locations of other SEMs; B – distal bothridial surface in posterior borthridium; C – proximal bothridial surface with rim; D – proximal bothridial surface near rim; E – proximal bothridial surface; F – strobila.	Fig. 11. Scanning electron micrographs of Stillabothrium jeanfortiae sp. n. from Himantura australis Last, White et Naylor. A – scolex; letters indicate locations of other SEMs; B – distal bothridial surface in posterior borthridium; C – proximal bothridial surface with rim; D – proximal bothridial surface near rim; E – proximal bothridial surface; F – strobila.	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFF8FFB5DC2F8765FD6C2E37.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143462/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143462	Fig. 16. Light micrographs of terminal genitalia of Stillabothrium species, each with genital pore oriented left. A – Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor); B – Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura gerrardi (Gray); C – Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides; D – Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Yearsley; E – Stillabothrium jeanfortiae sp. n. from Himantura australis Last, White et Naylor; F – Stillabothrium cadenati comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle).	Fig. 16. Light micrographs of terminal genitalia of Stillabothrium species, each with genital pore oriented left. A – Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor); B – Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura gerrardi (Gray); C – Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides; D – Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Yearsley; E – Stillabothrium jeanfortiae sp. n. from Himantura australis Last, White et Naylor; F – Stillabothrium cadenati comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFE5FFB2DF958465FC322D97.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143430/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143430	Fig. 1. Phylogram based on Bayesian analysis of 1084 bp region of D1–D3 28S rDNA. Numbers above branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities, numbers below indicate Bootstrap percentage values, based on 1000 replicates. Scale indicates expected num- ber of substitutions per site. Diagrammatic line drawings of fully opened bothridia of the seven described species mapped onto the clades representing those respective species. Host species information in Table 1.	Fig. 1. Phylogram based on Bayesian analysis of 1084 bp region of D1–D3 28S rDNA. Numbers above branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities, numbers below indicate Bootstrap percentage values, based on 1000 replicates. Scale indicates expected num- ber of substitutions per site. Diagrammatic line drawings of fully opened bothridia of the seven described species mapped onto the clades representing those respective species. Host species information in Table 1.	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFE5FFB2DF958465FC322D97.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143454/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143454	Fig. 12. Line drawings of Stillabothrium cadenati comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle). A – whole worm (LRP 9135); B – bothridium (LRP 9134); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9136).	Fig. 12. Line drawings of Stillabothrium cadenati comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle). A – whole worm (LRP 9135); B – bothridium (LRP 9134); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9136).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFE5FFB2DF958465FC322D97.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143456/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143456	Fig. 13. Histological sections through bothridium of Stillabothrium cadenati (Euzet, 1954) comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle). Arrows indicate divisions between proximal and distal portions of transverse septa. Abbreviations: ATS – an- teriormost transverse septum; IV – intestinal villus; RM – radial musculature; RTS – reduced transverse septum; SM – septal mus- culature; ST – stalk; TM – transverse muscle bundle.	Fig. 13. Histological sections through bothridium of Stillabothrium cadenati (Euzet, 1954) comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle). Arrows indicate divisions between proximal and distal portions of transverse septa. Abbreviations: ATS – an- teriormost transverse septum; IV – intestinal villus; RM – radial musculature; RTS – reduced transverse septum; SM – septal mus- culature; ST – stalk; TM – transverse muscle bundle.	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFE5FFB2DF958465FC322D97.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143458/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143458	Fig. 14. Scanning electron micrographs of Stillabothrium cadenati (Euzet, 1954) comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle). A – scolex, letters indicate locations of other SEMs; B – bothridium; C – distal bothridial surface at rim; D – distal bothridial surface within loculus; E – distal bothridial surface within septa; F – proximal bothridial surface; G – strobila.	Fig. 14. Scanning electron micrographs of Stillabothrium cadenati (Euzet, 1954) comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle). A – scolex, letters indicate locations of other SEMs; B – bothridium; C – distal bothridial surface at rim; D – distal bothridial surface within loculus; E – distal bothridial surface within septa; F – proximal bothridial surface; G – strobila.	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFE5FFB2DF958465FC322D97.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143462/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143462	Fig. 16. Light micrographs of terminal genitalia of Stillabothrium species, each with genital pore oriented left. A – Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor); B – Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura gerrardi (Gray); C – Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides; D – Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Yearsley; E – Stillabothrium jeanfortiae sp. n. from Himantura australis Last, White et Naylor; F – Stillabothrium cadenati comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle).	Fig. 16. Light micrographs of terminal genitalia of Stillabothrium species, each with genital pore oriented left. A – Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor); B – Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura gerrardi (Gray); C – Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides; D – Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Yearsley; E – Stillabothrium jeanfortiae sp. n. from Himantura australis Last, White et Naylor; F – Stillabothrium cadenati comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFE5FFB2DF958465FC322D97.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143432/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143432	Fig. 2. Line drawings of Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor). A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.6 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9011); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9010) with position of sections labeled (uterus not shown); D – section of mature proglottid at level of testes (LRP 9037); E – section of mature proglottid posterior to ovarian bridge (LRP 9030).	Fig. 2. Line drawings of Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor). A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.6 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9011); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9010) with position of sections labeled (uterus not shown); D – section of mature proglottid at level of testes (LRP 9037); E – section of mature proglottid posterior to ovarian bridge (LRP 9030).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFE5FFB2DF958465FC322D97.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143438/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143438	Fig. 4. Line drawings of Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura heterura (Bleeker). A – whole worm (LRP 9046); B – scolex (holotype, MZUM [P] 2016.9 [H]); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9046).	Fig. 4. Line drawings of Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura heterura (Bleeker). A – whole worm (LRP 9046); B – scolex (holotype, MZUM [P] 2016.9 [H]); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9046).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFE5FFB2DF958465FC322D97.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143442/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143442	Fig. 6. Line drawings of Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides. A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.11 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9066); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9067).	Fig. 6. Line drawings of Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides. A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.11 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9066); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9067).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFE5FFB2DF958465FC322D97.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143446/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143446	Fig. 8. Line drawings of Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Yearsley. A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.13 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9092); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9088).	Fig. 8. Line drawings of Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Yearsley. A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.13 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9092); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9088).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFE5FFB2DF958465FC322D97.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143450/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143450	Fig. 10. Line drawings of Stillabothrium jeanfortiae sp. n. from Himantura australis Last, White et Naylor. A – whole worm (holotype; QM G235198); B – scolex (LRP 9123); C – terminal proglottid (holotype; QM 235198).	Fig. 10. Line drawings of Stillabothrium jeanfortiae sp. n. from Himantura australis Last, White et Naylor. A – whole worm (holotype; QM G235198); B – scolex (LRP 9123); C – terminal proglottid (holotype; QM 235198).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFE2FFB1DC2F8405FC482AB7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143430/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143430	Fig. 1. Phylogram based on Bayesian analysis of 1084 bp region of D1–D3 28S rDNA. Numbers above branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities, numbers below indicate Bootstrap percentage values, based on 1000 replicates. Scale indicates expected num- ber of substitutions per site. Diagrammatic line drawings of fully opened bothridia of the seven described species mapped onto the clades representing those respective species. Host species information in Table 1.	Fig. 1. Phylogram based on Bayesian analysis of 1084 bp region of D1–D3 28S rDNA. Numbers above branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities, numbers below indicate Bootstrap percentage values, based on 1000 replicates. Scale indicates expected num- ber of substitutions per site. Diagrammatic line drawings of fully opened bothridia of the seven described species mapped onto the clades representing those respective species. Host species information in Table 1.	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFE2FFB1DC2F8405FC482AB7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143460/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143460	Fig. 15. Line drawing of bothridium of the holotype (QM GL4621) of Stillabothrium amuletum (Butler, 1987) comb. n. from Glaucostegus typus [Anonymous (Bennett)].	Fig. 15. Line drawing of bothridium of the holotype (QM GL4621) of Stillabothrium amuletum (Butler, 1987) comb. n. from Glaucostegus typus [Anonymous (Bennett)].	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFE2FFB1DC2F8405FC482AB7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143432/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143432	Fig. 2. Line drawings of Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor). A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.6 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9011); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9010) with position of sections labeled (uterus not shown); D – section of mature proglottid at level of testes (LRP 9037); E – section of mature proglottid posterior to ovarian bridge (LRP 9030).	Fig. 2. Line drawings of Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor). A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.6 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9011); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9010) with position of sections labeled (uterus not shown); D – section of mature proglottid at level of testes (LRP 9037); E – section of mature proglottid posterior to ovarian bridge (LRP 9030).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFE2FFB1DC2F8405FC482AB7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143438/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143438	Fig. 4. Line drawings of Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura heterura (Bleeker). A – whole worm (LRP 9046); B – scolex (holotype, MZUM [P] 2016.9 [H]); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9046).	Fig. 4. Line drawings of Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura heterura (Bleeker). A – whole worm (LRP 9046); B – scolex (holotype, MZUM [P] 2016.9 [H]); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9046).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFE2FFB1DC2F8405FC482AB7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143442/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143442	Fig. 6. Line drawings of Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides. A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.11 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9066); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9067).	Fig. 6. Line drawings of Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides. A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.11 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9066); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9067).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFE2FFB1DC2F8405FC482AB7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143446/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143446	Fig. 8. Line drawings of Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Yearsley. A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.13 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9092); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9088).	Fig. 8. Line drawings of Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Yearsley. A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.13 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9092); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9088).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFE2FFB1DC2F8405FC482AB7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143450/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143450	Fig. 10. Line drawings of Stillabothrium jeanfortiae sp. n. from Himantura australis Last, White et Naylor. A – whole worm (holotype; QM G235198); B – scolex (LRP 9123); C – terminal proglottid (holotype; QM 235198).	Fig. 10. Line drawings of Stillabothrium jeanfortiae sp. n. from Himantura australis Last, White et Naylor. A – whole worm (holotype; QM G235198); B – scolex (LRP 9123); C – terminal proglottid (holotype; QM 235198).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
03EB87AEFFE2FFB1DC2F8405FC482AB7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8143454/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8143454	Fig. 12. Line drawings of Stillabothrium cadenati comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle). A – whole worm (LRP 9135); B – bothridium (LRP 9134); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9136).	Fig. 12. Line drawings of Stillabothrium cadenati comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle). A – whole worm (LRP 9135); B – bothridium (LRP 9134); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9136).	2016-11-10	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.		Zenodo	biologists	Reyda, Florian B.;Healy, Claire J.;Haslach, Andrew R.;Ruhnke, Timothy R.;Aprill, Tara L.;Bergman, Michael P.;Daigler, Andrew L.;Dedrick, Elsie A.;Delgado, Illari;Forti, Kathryn S.;Herzog, Kaylee S.;Russell, Rebecca S.;Willsey, Danielle D.			
