taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03EB87C86F6DFFDEFF30FABAA05977B6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288969/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288969	FIGURE 5. A–D, Cypria maculata Hoff, 1942, A, C holotype (♀, SMNH 81083), B, D allotype (♂, SMNH 81084); E-F, C. palustera Furtos, 1935, paratype (♂, SMNH 71410); G-I, Cypria spinifera Tressler, 1937, type (♀, SMNH 71504): A—LV, interior view; B—UR of ♂; C—UR and genital field of ♀: D, E—hemipenis (arrow on E showing well sclerotized parts); F, G—T2; H—UR and genital field of ♀; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 5. A–D, Cypria maculata Hoff, 1942, A, C holotype (♀, SMNH 81083), B, D allotype (♂, SMNH 81084); E-F, C. palustera Furtos, 1935, paratype (♂, SMNH 71410); G-I, Cypria spinifera Tressler, 1937, type (♀, SMNH 71504): A—LV, interior view; B—UR of ♂; C—UR and genital field of ♀: D, E—hemipenis (arrow on E showing well sclerotized parts); F, G—T2; H—UR and genital field of ♀; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F6CFFD2FF30FBA5A1CC7746.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288959/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288959	FIGURE 1. A, Cyclocypris washingtoniensis Dobbin, 1941, syntype (male, SMNH 335865); B, C, E, H, I, Cyclocypris sharpei Furtos, 1933, B, C, E Paratype (♂, SMNH 67879), H, I paratype (♂, SMNH 67920); D, F, G, C. cruciata Furtos, 1935 holotype (♂, SMNH 71416): A—left prehensile palp, B—T3, without basal segment, C—T2; D, E—UR, F—LV, interior view (valve broken), G—RV, interior view; H—LV, interior view; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 1. A, Cyclocypris washingtoniensis Dobbin, 1941, syntype (male, SMNH 335865); B, C, E, H, I, Cyclocypris sharpei Furtos, 1933, B, C, E Paratype (♂, SMNH 67879), H, I paratype (♂, SMNH 67920); D, F, G, C. cruciata Furtos, 1935 holotype (♂, SMNH 71416): A—left prehensile palp, B—T3, without basal segment, C—T2; D, E—UR, F—LV, interior view (valve broken), G—RV, interior view; H—LV, interior view; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F6CFFD2FF30FBA5A1CC7746.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288961/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288961	FIGURE 2. Cyclocypris pusilla Sars, 1895, type (NHMO F11355): A—carapace, dorsal view; B—carapace, exterior view from the left side (carapace slightly tilted); C—T2, D—UR; E—T3, withouth basal segment; F—hemipenis, outline only. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 2. Cyclocypris pusilla Sars, 1895, type (NHMO F11355): A—carapace, dorsal view; B—carapace, exterior view from the left side (carapace slightly tilted); C—T2, D—UR; E—T3, withouth basal segment; F—hemipenis, outline only. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F6CFFD2FF30FBA5A1CC7746.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288965/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288965	FIGURE 3. Distribution of the genus Cyclocypris Brady & Norman, 1889: 1—C. ampla Furtos, 1933; 2—C. brevisetosa Bronstein, 1928; 3—C. diebeli Absolon, 1978; 4—C. forbesi Sharpe, 1897; 5—C. globosa (Sars, 1863); 6—C. laevis (O.F. Müller, 1776); 7– C. mediosetosa Meisch, 1987; 8—C. modesta (Herrick, 1887); 9—C. nahcotta Dobbin, 1941; 10—C. ovum (Jurine, 1820); 11—C. pusilla Sars, 1895; 12—C. scrobiculata Klie, 1936; 13—C. serena (Koch, 1838); 14—C. sharpei Furtos, 1933; 15—C. vinyardi Külköylüoĝlu, 2008. Note: C. laevis and C. ovum are distributed in the entire Holarctic and the dotted line is only approximate distribution of the two species.	FIGURE 3. Distribution of the genus Cyclocypris Brady & Norman, 1889: 1—C. ampla Furtos, 1933; 2—C. brevisetosa Bronstein, 1928; 3—C. diebeli Absolon, 1978; 4—C. forbesi Sharpe, 1897; 5—C. globosa (Sars, 1863); 6—C. laevis (O.F. Müller, 1776); 7– C. mediosetosa Meisch, 1987; 8—C. modesta (Herrick, 1887); 9—C. nahcotta Dobbin, 1941; 10—C. ovum (Jurine, 1820); 11—C. pusilla Sars, 1895; 12—C. scrobiculata Klie, 1936; 13—C. serena (Koch, 1838); 14—C. sharpei Furtos, 1933; 15—C. vinyardi Külköylüoĝlu, 2008. Note: C. laevis and C. ovum are distributed in the entire Holarctic and the dotted line is only approximate distribution of the two species.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F67FFCCFF30FDEFA28675AE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288991/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288991	FIGURE 13. Keysercypria affinis (Klie, 1933). Lectotype ♂ (ZMH 538a): A—T3; B—T2 without terminal segment: C—basal and first endopodal segments of A2; D—right prehensile palp; E—penultimate and terminal segments of A2; F—hemipenis, only outline; G—terminal segment and terminal claw of T2. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 13. Keysercypria affinis (Klie, 1933). Lectotype ♂ (ZMH 538a): A—T3; B—T2 without terminal segment: C—basal and first endopodal segments of A2; D—right prehensile palp; E—penultimate and terminal segments of A2; F—hemipenis, only outline; G—terminal segment and terminal claw of T2. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F67FFCCFF30FDEFA28675AE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288995/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288995	FIGURE 14. Keysercypria deformis (Klie, 1940). A-E, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 550a), F-H paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 550b): A—last three segments of T2; B—last two segments of A2; C—right prehensile palp; D—left prehensile palp; E—hemipenis; F—UR; G—LV; H—RV: I—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. G-I modified after Klie (1940) and not to scale.	FIGURE 14. Keysercypria deformis (Klie, 1940). A-E, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 550a), F-H paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 550b): A—last three segments of T2; B—last two segments of A2; C—right prehensile palp; D—left prehensile palp; E—hemipenis; F—UR; G—LV; H—RV: I—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. G-I modified after Klie (1940) and not to scale.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F67FFCCFF30FDEFA28675AE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5496023/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5496023	FIGURE 15. Keysercypria longiseta (Klie, 1930). A-F, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 937a); G-I. paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 937b): A—last two segments of A2; B—last five segments of A1; C—hemipenis; D—T2; E—right prehensile palp; F—left prehensile palp; G—LV; H—RV, I—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. G-I modified after Klie (1930) and not to scale.	FIGURE 15. Keysercypria longiseta (Klie, 1930). A-F, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 937a); G-I. paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 937b): A—last two segments of A2; B—last five segments of A1; C—hemipenis; D—T2; E—right prehensile palp; F—left prehensile palp; G—LV; H—RV, I—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. G-I modified after Klie (1930) and not to scale.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F67FFCCFF30FDEFA28675AE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288999/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288999	FIGURE 16. A, B Keysercypria deformis (Klie, 1940). A, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 550); B, paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 550b); C-F— Keysercypria pellucida (Sars, 1901), ♀ (NHMO F11534): A—distal five segments of A1; B—UR; C—T3; D—UR; E—T2; F—carapace, lateral view from the right side. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 16. A, B Keysercypria deformis (Klie, 1940). A, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 550); B, paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 550b); C-F— Keysercypria pellucida (Sars, 1901), ♀ (NHMO F11534): A—distal five segments of A1; B—UR; C—T3; D—UR; E—T2; F—carapace, lateral view from the right side. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F67FFCCFF30FDEFA28675AE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289001/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289001	FIGURE 17. Keysercypria obtusa (Klie, 1940). A-E, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 524a); F-H, paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 524b): A— hemipenis; B—left prehensile palp; C—right prehensile palp; D—T3; E—T2; F—LV; G—RV; H—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. F-H modified after Klie (1940) and not to scale.	FIGURE 17. Keysercypria obtusa (Klie, 1940). A-E, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 524a); F-H, paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 524b): A— hemipenis; B—left prehensile palp; C—right prehensile palp; D—T3; E—T2; F—LV; G—RV; H—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. F-H modified after Klie (1940) and not to scale.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F67FFCCFF30FDEFA28675AE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289015/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289015	FIGURE 22. Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. A, C, F—allotype, ♀; B, D, E—holotype, ♂: A—A2; B—T3; C— UR; D—hemipenis; E, F—T2, showing the variability in the L of the “e” seta. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 22. Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. A, C, F—allotype, ♀; B, D, E—holotype, ♂: A—A2; B—T3; C— UR; D—hemipenis; E, F—T2, showing the variability in the L of the “e” seta. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F67FFCCFF30FDEFA28675AE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289019/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289019	FIGURE 23. Physocypria obtusa (Sars, 1910). ♀ (RBINS O.C. 519a, b): A—LV, exterior view; B—detail of the anterior margin of the RV; C—A2; D—T2; E—UR; F—A1. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 23. Physocypria obtusa (Sars, 1910). ♀ (RBINS O.C. 519a, b): A—LV, exterior view; B—detail of the anterior margin of the RV; C—A2; D—T2; E—UR; F—A1. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F67FFCCFF30FDEFA28675AE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288969/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288969	FIGURE 5. A–D, Cypria maculata Hoff, 1942, A, C holotype (♀, SMNH 81083), B, D allotype (♂, SMNH 81084); E-F, C. palustera Furtos, 1935, paratype (♂, SMNH 71410); G-I, Cypria spinifera Tressler, 1937, type (♀, SMNH 71504): A—LV, interior view; B—UR of ♂; C—UR and genital field of ♀: D, E—hemipenis (arrow on E showing well sclerotized parts); F, G—T2; H—UR and genital field of ♀; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 5. A–D, Cypria maculata Hoff, 1942, A, C holotype (♀, SMNH 81083), B, D allotype (♂, SMNH 81084); E-F, C. palustera Furtos, 1935, paratype (♂, SMNH 71410); G-I, Cypria spinifera Tressler, 1937, type (♀, SMNH 71504): A—LV, interior view; B—UR of ♂; C—UR and genital field of ♀: D, E—hemipenis (arrow on E showing well sclerotized parts); F, G—T2; H—UR and genital field of ♀; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F67FFCCFF30FDEFA28675AE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288967/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288967	FIGURE 4. Cypria karamani Petkovski, 1976: SEM-image, dorso/lateral view.	FIGURE 4. Cypria karamani Petkovski, 1976: SEM-image, dorso/lateral view.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F67FFCCFF30FDEFA28675AE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288973/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288973	FIGURE 6. Cypria pustulosa Sharp, 1897, A, B, C, D, F, G, H (♂, SMNH 111402), E (♀, SMNH 111407): A—RV, interior view; B—LV, interior view; C—T2; D—hemipenis; E—UR and genital field; F—UR; G, H—prehensile palps. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 6. Cypria pustulosa Sharp, 1897, A, B, C, D, F, G, H (♂, SMNH 111402), E (♀, SMNH 111407): A—RV, interior view; B—LV, interior view; C—T2; D—hemipenis; E—UR and genital field; F—UR; G, H—prehensile palps. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F67FFCCFF30FDEFA28675AE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288977/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288977	FIGURE 8. A, Cypria kerkyirensis (Klie, 1936), syntypes (♂, ZMH 539a); B-E, C. brevisetigera Cole, 1965, A, B, D, holotype (♀, SMNH 120555), C, allotype (♂, SMNH 120556): A—T2, without basal segment, showing the intermediate L of the seta “e”; B—UR; C—hemipenis, outline only; D—T2, without basal segment, showing the short seta “e”; E—T3, showing the absence of the “d2” seta. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 8. A, Cypria kerkyirensis (Klie, 1936), syntypes (♂, ZMH 539a); B-E, C. brevisetigera Cole, 1965, A, B, D, holotype (♀, SMNH 120555), C, allotype (♂, SMNH 120556): A—T2, without basal segment, showing the intermediate L of the seta “e”; B—UR; C—hemipenis, outline only; D—T2, without basal segment, showing the short seta “e”; E—T3, showing the absence of the “d2” seta. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F67FFCCFF30FDEFA28675AE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288975/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288975	FIGURE 7. Cypria pusilla Sars, 1896 (NHMO F11601): A—carapace, exterior view from the left side (microphotograph); B—T2, C—A2; D—A1, not all setae drawn; E—T3; F—two terminal segments of Md-palp, without setae drawn. Scales for B- F = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 7. Cypria pusilla Sars, 1896 (NHMO F11601): A—carapace, exterior view from the left side (microphotograph); B—T2, C—A2; D—A1, not all setae drawn; E—T3; F—two terminal segments of Md-palp, without setae drawn. Scales for B- F = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F67FFCCFF30FDEFA28675AE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288979/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288979	FIGURE 9. Digital photograph of original slides. A-C—C. koenikei Daday, 1910 (HNHM IV/P 106, 107); D—[not] Cypria lenticularis G.W. Müller, 1898 (HNHM IV/P 108); E, F—Physocypria castanea (Brady, 1904), ♀ (HNHM IV/P 104): A—Carapace, exterior view from the right side, RV partly broken; B—paired hemipenis; C, D - Zenker organ, showing the presence of numerous chitinous whorls of spines; E—T2, showing the presence of the “d1” seta; F—UR, proximal part not visible.	FIGURE 9. Digital photograph of original slides. A-C—C. koenikei Daday, 1910 (HNHM IV/P 106, 107); D—[not] Cypria lenticularis G.W. Müller, 1898 (HNHM IV/P 108); E, F—Physocypria castanea (Brady, 1904), ♀ (HNHM IV/P 104): A—Carapace, exterior view from the right side, RV partly broken; B—paired hemipenis; C, D - Zenker organ, showing the presence of numerous chitinous whorls of spines; E—T2, showing the presence of the “d1” seta; F—UR, proximal part not visible.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F67FFCCFF30FDEFA28675AE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288983/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288983	FIGURE 10. Distribution of the genus Cypria Zenker, 1854. 1—C. bicolor Petkovski & Meisch, 1994; 2—C. biwaense Okubo, 1990; 3—C. brevisetigera Cole, 1965; 4—C. cavernae Wagenleitner, 1990; 5—C. crenulata Sars, 1903; 6—C. curvifurcata Klie, 1923; 7—C. denticulata Daday, 1905; 8—C. dentifera Sharp, 1897; 9—C. devai Arora, 1932; 10—C. dumonti (Martens, 1982); 11—Cypria exsculpta (Fischer, 1855); 12—C. exquisita Furtos, 1936; 13—C. furfuracea (Brady, 1886); 14— C. gibbera Furtos, 1936; 15—C. globula Furtos, 1933; 16—C. granadae (Hartmann, 1959); 17—C. inequivalva Turner, 1893; 18—C. inflata (Furtos, 1933); 19—C. inversa Klie, 1941; 20—C. javana G.W. Müller, 1906; 21—C. karamani Petkovski, 1976; 22—C. kerkyrensis (Klie, 1936); 23—C. konishii Smith & Kamiya, 2006; 24—C. kraepelini (G.W. Müller, 1903); 25— C. larensis (Hartmann, 1964); 26—C. lubeziensis Kovalenko, 1982; 27—C. maculata Hoff, 1942; 28—C. matzkeae Smith & Janz, 2008; 29—C. mediana Hoff, 1942; 30—C. minicapensis (Green, 1962); 31—C. minuta (Victor & Michael, 1975); 32— C. mons (Chambers, 1887); 33—C. obesa Sharpe, 1897; 34—C. nipponica Okubo, 1990; 35—C. obliqua Klie, 1939; 36—C. ophtalmica (Jurine, 1820) s.l.; 37—C. osburni (Furtos, 1933); 38—C. palustera Furtos, 1935; 39—C. polessica Kovalenko, 1982; 40—C. posterotuberculata Furtos, 1935; 41—C. pseudocrenulata Furtos, 1936; 42—C. pusilla Sars, 1896; 43—C. pustulosa Sharpe, 1897; 44—C. reptans Bronstein, 1928; 45—C. sharmai Battish, 1985; 46—C. sketi Petkovski, 1976; 47—C. spinifera Tressler, 1937; 48—C. subsala Redeke, 1936; 49—C. sywulae Meisch, 2000; 50—C. turneri Hoff, 1942	FIGURE 10. Distribution of the genus Cypria Zenker, 1854. 1—C. bicolor Petkovski & Meisch, 1994; 2—C. biwaense Okubo, 1990; 3—C. brevisetigera Cole, 1965; 4—C. cavernae Wagenleitner, 1990; 5—C. crenulata Sars, 1903; 6—C. curvifurcata Klie, 1923; 7—C. denticulata Daday, 1905; 8—C. dentifera Sharp, 1897; 9—C. devai Arora, 1932; 10—C. dumonti (Martens, 1982); 11—Cypria exsculpta (Fischer, 1855); 12—C. exquisita Furtos, 1936; 13—C. furfuracea (Brady, 1886); 14— C. gibbera Furtos, 1936; 15—C. globula Furtos, 1933; 16—C. granadae (Hartmann, 1959); 17—C. inequivalva Turner, 1893; 18—C. inflata (Furtos, 1933); 19—C. inversa Klie, 1941; 20—C. javana G.W. Müller, 1906; 21—C. karamani Petkovski, 1976; 22—C. kerkyrensis (Klie, 1936); 23—C. konishii Smith & Kamiya, 2006; 24—C. kraepelini (G.W. Müller, 1903); 25— C. larensis (Hartmann, 1964); 26—C. lubeziensis Kovalenko, 1982; 27—C. maculata Hoff, 1942; 28—C. matzkeae Smith & Janz, 2008; 29—C. mediana Hoff, 1942; 30—C. minicapensis (Green, 1962); 31—C. minuta (Victor & Michael, 1975); 32— C. mons (Chambers, 1887); 33—C. obesa Sharpe, 1897; 34—C. nipponica Okubo, 1990; 35—C. obliqua Klie, 1939; 36—C. ophtalmica (Jurine, 1820) s.l.; 37—C. osburni (Furtos, 1933); 38—C. palustera Furtos, 1935; 39—C. polessica Kovalenko, 1982; 40—C. posterotuberculata Furtos, 1935; 41—C. pseudocrenulata Furtos, 1936; 42—C. pusilla Sars, 1896; 43—C. pustulosa Sharpe, 1897; 44—C. reptans Bronstein, 1928; 45—C. sharmai Battish, 1985; 46—C. sketi Petkovski, 1976; 47—C. spinifera Tressler, 1937; 48—C. subsala Redeke, 1936; 49—C. sywulae Meisch, 2000; 50—C. turneri Hoff, 1942	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F7DFFCEFF30F8A0A72570E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288985/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288985	FIGURE 11. Distribution of the genus Keysercypria gen. nov. 1—K. affinis (Klie, 1933); 2—K. circinata (Würdig & Pinto, 1993); 3—K. deformis (Klie, 1940); 4—K. longiseta (Klie, 1930); 5—K. obtusa (Klie, 1940); 6—K. pellucida (Sars, 1901); 7—K. sanctaeannae (Margalef, 1961); 8—K. schubarti (Farkas, 1958); 9—K. xanabanica (Furtos, 1936).	FIGURE 11. Distribution of the genus Keysercypria gen. nov. 1—K. affinis (Klie, 1933); 2—K. circinata (Würdig & Pinto, 1993); 3—K. deformis (Klie, 1940); 4—K. longiseta (Klie, 1930); 5—K. obtusa (Klie, 1940); 6—K. pellucida (Sars, 1901); 7—K. sanctaeannae (Margalef, 1961); 8—K. schubarti (Farkas, 1958); 9—K. xanabanica (Furtos, 1936).	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F73FFC3FF30FA35A3E47252.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288989/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288989	FIGURE 12. Keysercypria affinis (Klie, 1933). A-E, K—paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 538b); F-J—lectotype ♂ (ZMH 538a) A— Two terminal segments of A2; B—UR; C—LV: D—RV; E—carapace, dorsal view; F—distal four segments of A1; G—UR; H—proximal part of A1, not all setae drawn; I—Mxl-palp; J—right prehensile palp; K—terminal segment and claw of T2. Scales = 0.1 mm. C-D modified after Klie (1933), and not to scale.	FIGURE 12. Keysercypria affinis (Klie, 1933). A-E, K—paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 538b); F-J—lectotype ♂ (ZMH 538a) A— Two terminal segments of A2; B—UR; C—LV: D—RV; E—carapace, dorsal view; F—distal four segments of A1; G—UR; H—proximal part of A1, not all setae drawn; I—Mxl-palp; J—right prehensile palp; K—terminal segment and claw of T2. Scales = 0.1 mm. C-D modified after Klie (1933), and not to scale.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F73FFC3FF30FA35A3E47252.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288991/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288991	FIGURE 13. Keysercypria affinis (Klie, 1933). Lectotype ♂ (ZMH 538a): A—T3; B—T2 without terminal segment: C—basal and first endopodal segments of A2; D—right prehensile palp; E—penultimate and terminal segments of A2; F—hemipenis, only outline; G—terminal segment and terminal claw of T2. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 13. Keysercypria affinis (Klie, 1933). Lectotype ♂ (ZMH 538a): A—T3; B—T2 without terminal segment: C—basal and first endopodal segments of A2; D—right prehensile palp; E—penultimate and terminal segments of A2; F—hemipenis, only outline; G—terminal segment and terminal claw of T2. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F73FFC3FF30FA35A3E47252.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288959/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288959	FIGURE 1. A, Cyclocypris washingtoniensis Dobbin, 1941, syntype (male, SMNH 335865); B, C, E, H, I, Cyclocypris sharpei Furtos, 1933, B, C, E Paratype (♂, SMNH 67879), H, I paratype (♂, SMNH 67920); D, F, G, C. cruciata Furtos, 1935 holotype (♂, SMNH 71416): A—left prehensile palp, B—T3, without basal segment, C—T2; D, E—UR, F—LV, interior view (valve broken), G—RV, interior view; H—LV, interior view; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 1. A, Cyclocypris washingtoniensis Dobbin, 1941, syntype (male, SMNH 335865); B, C, E, H, I, Cyclocypris sharpei Furtos, 1933, B, C, E Paratype (♂, SMNH 67879), H, I paratype (♂, SMNH 67920); D, F, G, C. cruciata Furtos, 1935 holotype (♂, SMNH 71416): A—left prehensile palp, B—T3, without basal segment, C—T2; D, E—UR, F—LV, interior view (valve broken), G—RV, interior view; H—LV, interior view; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F73FFC3FF30FA35A3E47252.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288961/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288961	FIGURE 2. Cyclocypris pusilla Sars, 1895, type (NHMO F11355): A—carapace, dorsal view; B—carapace, exterior view from the left side (carapace slightly tilted); C—T2, D—UR; E—T3, withouth basal segment; F—hemipenis, outline only. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 2. Cyclocypris pusilla Sars, 1895, type (NHMO F11355): A—carapace, dorsal view; B—carapace, exterior view from the left side (carapace slightly tilted); C—T2, D—UR; E—T3, withouth basal segment; F—hemipenis, outline only. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F73FFC3FF30FA35A3E47252.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288965/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288965	FIGURE 3. Distribution of the genus Cyclocypris Brady & Norman, 1889: 1—C. ampla Furtos, 1933; 2—C. brevisetosa Bronstein, 1928; 3—C. diebeli Absolon, 1978; 4—C. forbesi Sharpe, 1897; 5—C. globosa (Sars, 1863); 6—C. laevis (O.F. Müller, 1776); 7– C. mediosetosa Meisch, 1987; 8—C. modesta (Herrick, 1887); 9—C. nahcotta Dobbin, 1941; 10—C. ovum (Jurine, 1820); 11—C. pusilla Sars, 1895; 12—C. scrobiculata Klie, 1936; 13—C. serena (Koch, 1838); 14—C. sharpei Furtos, 1933; 15—C. vinyardi Külköylüoĝlu, 2008. Note: C. laevis and C. ovum are distributed in the entire Holarctic and the dotted line is only approximate distribution of the two species.	FIGURE 3. Distribution of the genus Cyclocypris Brady & Norman, 1889: 1—C. ampla Furtos, 1933; 2—C. brevisetosa Bronstein, 1928; 3—C. diebeli Absolon, 1978; 4—C. forbesi Sharpe, 1897; 5—C. globosa (Sars, 1863); 6—C. laevis (O.F. Müller, 1776); 7– C. mediosetosa Meisch, 1987; 8—C. modesta (Herrick, 1887); 9—C. nahcotta Dobbin, 1941; 10—C. ovum (Jurine, 1820); 11—C. pusilla Sars, 1895; 12—C. scrobiculata Klie, 1936; 13—C. serena (Koch, 1838); 14—C. sharpei Furtos, 1933; 15—C. vinyardi Külköylüoĝlu, 2008. Note: C. laevis and C. ovum are distributed in the entire Holarctic and the dotted line is only approximate distribution of the two species.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F73FFC3FF30FA35A3E47252.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288967/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288967	FIGURE 4. Cypria karamani Petkovski, 1976: SEM-image, dorso/lateral view.	FIGURE 4. Cypria karamani Petkovski, 1976: SEM-image, dorso/lateral view.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F73FFC3FF30FA35A3E47252.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288969/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288969	FIGURE 5. A–D, Cypria maculata Hoff, 1942, A, C holotype (♀, SMNH 81083), B, D allotype (♂, SMNH 81084); E-F, C. palustera Furtos, 1935, paratype (♂, SMNH 71410); G-I, Cypria spinifera Tressler, 1937, type (♀, SMNH 71504): A—LV, interior view; B—UR of ♂; C—UR and genital field of ♀: D, E—hemipenis (arrow on E showing well sclerotized parts); F, G—T2; H—UR and genital field of ♀; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 5. A–D, Cypria maculata Hoff, 1942, A, C holotype (♀, SMNH 81083), B, D allotype (♂, SMNH 81084); E-F, C. palustera Furtos, 1935, paratype (♂, SMNH 71410); G-I, Cypria spinifera Tressler, 1937, type (♀, SMNH 71504): A—LV, interior view; B—UR of ♂; C—UR and genital field of ♀: D, E—hemipenis (arrow on E showing well sclerotized parts); F, G—T2; H—UR and genital field of ♀; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F77FFC5FF30FF7DA219724F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288995/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288995	FIGURE 14. Keysercypria deformis (Klie, 1940). A-E, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 550a), F-H paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 550b): A—last three segments of T2; B—last two segments of A2; C—right prehensile palp; D—left prehensile palp; E—hemipenis; F—UR; G—LV; H—RV: I—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. G-I modified after Klie (1940) and not to scale.	FIGURE 14. Keysercypria deformis (Klie, 1940). A-E, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 550a), F-H paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 550b): A—last three segments of T2; B—last two segments of A2; C—right prehensile palp; D—left prehensile palp; E—hemipenis; F—UR; G—LV; H—RV: I—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. G-I modified after Klie (1940) and not to scale.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F77FFC5FF30FF7DA219724F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288999/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288999	FIGURE 16. A, B Keysercypria deformis (Klie, 1940). A, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 550); B, paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 550b); C-F— Keysercypria pellucida (Sars, 1901), ♀ (NHMO F11534): A—distal five segments of A1; B—UR; C—T3; D—UR; E—T2; F—carapace, lateral view from the right side. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 16. A, B Keysercypria deformis (Klie, 1940). A, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 550); B, paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 550b); C-F— Keysercypria pellucida (Sars, 1901), ♀ (NHMO F11534): A—distal five segments of A1; B—UR; C—T3; D—UR; E—T2; F—carapace, lateral view from the right side. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F77FFC5FF30FF7DA219724F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288959/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288959	FIGURE 1. A, Cyclocypris washingtoniensis Dobbin, 1941, syntype (male, SMNH 335865); B, C, E, H, I, Cyclocypris sharpei Furtos, 1933, B, C, E Paratype (♂, SMNH 67879), H, I paratype (♂, SMNH 67920); D, F, G, C. cruciata Furtos, 1935 holotype (♂, SMNH 71416): A—left prehensile palp, B—T3, without basal segment, C—T2; D, E—UR, F—LV, interior view (valve broken), G—RV, interior view; H—LV, interior view; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 1. A, Cyclocypris washingtoniensis Dobbin, 1941, syntype (male, SMNH 335865); B, C, E, H, I, Cyclocypris sharpei Furtos, 1933, B, C, E Paratype (♂, SMNH 67879), H, I paratype (♂, SMNH 67920); D, F, G, C. cruciata Furtos, 1935 holotype (♂, SMNH 71416): A—left prehensile palp, B—T3, without basal segment, C—T2; D, E—UR, F—LV, interior view (valve broken), G—RV, interior view; H—LV, interior view; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F77FFC5FF30FF7DA219724F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288961/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288961	FIGURE 2. Cyclocypris pusilla Sars, 1895, type (NHMO F11355): A—carapace, dorsal view; B—carapace, exterior view from the left side (carapace slightly tilted); C—T2, D—UR; E—T3, withouth basal segment; F—hemipenis, outline only. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 2. Cyclocypris pusilla Sars, 1895, type (NHMO F11355): A—carapace, dorsal view; B—carapace, exterior view from the left side (carapace slightly tilted); C—T2, D—UR; E—T3, withouth basal segment; F—hemipenis, outline only. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F77FFC5FF30FF7DA219724F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288965/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288965	FIGURE 3. Distribution of the genus Cyclocypris Brady & Norman, 1889: 1—C. ampla Furtos, 1933; 2—C. brevisetosa Bronstein, 1928; 3—C. diebeli Absolon, 1978; 4—C. forbesi Sharpe, 1897; 5—C. globosa (Sars, 1863); 6—C. laevis (O.F. Müller, 1776); 7– C. mediosetosa Meisch, 1987; 8—C. modesta (Herrick, 1887); 9—C. nahcotta Dobbin, 1941; 10—C. ovum (Jurine, 1820); 11—C. pusilla Sars, 1895; 12—C. scrobiculata Klie, 1936; 13—C. serena (Koch, 1838); 14—C. sharpei Furtos, 1933; 15—C. vinyardi Külköylüoĝlu, 2008. Note: C. laevis and C. ovum are distributed in the entire Holarctic and the dotted line is only approximate distribution of the two species.	FIGURE 3. Distribution of the genus Cyclocypris Brady & Norman, 1889: 1—C. ampla Furtos, 1933; 2—C. brevisetosa Bronstein, 1928; 3—C. diebeli Absolon, 1978; 4—C. forbesi Sharpe, 1897; 5—C. globosa (Sars, 1863); 6—C. laevis (O.F. Müller, 1776); 7– C. mediosetosa Meisch, 1987; 8—C. modesta (Herrick, 1887); 9—C. nahcotta Dobbin, 1941; 10—C. ovum (Jurine, 1820); 11—C. pusilla Sars, 1895; 12—C. scrobiculata Klie, 1936; 13—C. serena (Koch, 1838); 14—C. sharpei Furtos, 1933; 15—C. vinyardi Külköylüoĝlu, 2008. Note: C. laevis and C. ovum are distributed in the entire Holarctic and the dotted line is only approximate distribution of the two species.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F77FFC5FF30FF7DA219724F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288967/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288967	FIGURE 4. Cypria karamani Petkovski, 1976: SEM-image, dorso/lateral view.	FIGURE 4. Cypria karamani Petkovski, 1976: SEM-image, dorso/lateral view.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F77FFC5FF30FF7DA219724F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288969/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288969	FIGURE 5. A–D, Cypria maculata Hoff, 1942, A, C holotype (♀, SMNH 81083), B, D allotype (♂, SMNH 81084); E-F, C. palustera Furtos, 1935, paratype (♂, SMNH 71410); G-I, Cypria spinifera Tressler, 1937, type (♀, SMNH 71504): A—LV, interior view; B—UR of ♂; C—UR and genital field of ♀: D, E—hemipenis (arrow on E showing well sclerotized parts); F, G—T2; H—UR and genital field of ♀; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 5. A–D, Cypria maculata Hoff, 1942, A, C holotype (♀, SMNH 81083), B, D allotype (♂, SMNH 81084); E-F, C. palustera Furtos, 1935, paratype (♂, SMNH 71410); G-I, Cypria spinifera Tressler, 1937, type (♀, SMNH 71504): A—LV, interior view; B—UR of ♂; C—UR and genital field of ♀: D, E—hemipenis (arrow on E showing well sclerotized parts); F, G—T2; H—UR and genital field of ♀; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F77FFC5FF30FF7DA219724F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288973/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288973	FIGURE 6. Cypria pustulosa Sharp, 1897, A, B, C, D, F, G, H (♂, SMNH 111402), E (♀, SMNH 111407): A—RV, interior view; B—LV, interior view; C—T2; D—hemipenis; E—UR and genital field; F—UR; G, H—prehensile palps. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 6. Cypria pustulosa Sharp, 1897, A, B, C, D, F, G, H (♂, SMNH 111402), E (♀, SMNH 111407): A—RV, interior view; B—LV, interior view; C—T2; D—hemipenis; E—UR and genital field; F—UR; G, H—prehensile palps. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F77FFC5FF30FF7DA219724F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288975/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288975	FIGURE 7. Cypria pusilla Sars, 1896 (NHMO F11601): A—carapace, exterior view from the left side (microphotograph); B—T2, C—A2; D—A1, not all setae drawn; E—T3; F—two terminal segments of Md-palp, without setae drawn. Scales for B- F = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 7. Cypria pusilla Sars, 1896 (NHMO F11601): A—carapace, exterior view from the left side (microphotograph); B—T2, C—A2; D—A1, not all setae drawn; E—T3; F—two terminal segments of Md-palp, without setae drawn. Scales for B- F = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F77FFC5FF30FF7DA219724F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288977/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288977	FIGURE 8. A, Cypria kerkyirensis (Klie, 1936), syntypes (♂, ZMH 539a); B-E, C. brevisetigera Cole, 1965, A, B, D, holotype (♀, SMNH 120555), C, allotype (♂, SMNH 120556): A—T2, without basal segment, showing the intermediate L of the seta “e”; B—UR; C—hemipenis, outline only; D—T2, without basal segment, showing the short seta “e”; E—T3, showing the absence of the “d2” seta. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 8. A, Cypria kerkyirensis (Klie, 1936), syntypes (♂, ZMH 539a); B-E, C. brevisetigera Cole, 1965, A, B, D, holotype (♀, SMNH 120555), C, allotype (♂, SMNH 120556): A—T2, without basal segment, showing the intermediate L of the seta “e”; B—UR; C—hemipenis, outline only; D—T2, without basal segment, showing the short seta “e”; E—T3, showing the absence of the “d2” seta. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F77FFC5FF30FF7DA219724F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288979/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288979	FIGURE 9. Digital photograph of original slides. A-C—C. koenikei Daday, 1910 (HNHM IV/P 106, 107); D—[not] Cypria lenticularis G.W. Müller, 1898 (HNHM IV/P 108); E, F—Physocypria castanea (Brady, 1904), ♀ (HNHM IV/P 104): A—Carapace, exterior view from the right side, RV partly broken; B—paired hemipenis; C, D - Zenker organ, showing the presence of numerous chitinous whorls of spines; E—T2, showing the presence of the “d1” seta; F—UR, proximal part not visible.	FIGURE 9. Digital photograph of original slides. A-C—C. koenikei Daday, 1910 (HNHM IV/P 106, 107); D—[not] Cypria lenticularis G.W. Müller, 1898 (HNHM IV/P 108); E, F—Physocypria castanea (Brady, 1904), ♀ (HNHM IV/P 104): A—Carapace, exterior view from the right side, RV partly broken; B—paired hemipenis; C, D - Zenker organ, showing the presence of numerous chitinous whorls of spines; E—T2, showing the presence of the “d1” seta; F—UR, proximal part not visible.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F77FFC5FF30FF7DA219724F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288983/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288983	FIGURE 10. Distribution of the genus Cypria Zenker, 1854. 1—C. bicolor Petkovski & Meisch, 1994; 2—C. biwaense Okubo, 1990; 3—C. brevisetigera Cole, 1965; 4—C. cavernae Wagenleitner, 1990; 5—C. crenulata Sars, 1903; 6—C. curvifurcata Klie, 1923; 7—C. denticulata Daday, 1905; 8—C. dentifera Sharp, 1897; 9—C. devai Arora, 1932; 10—C. dumonti (Martens, 1982); 11—Cypria exsculpta (Fischer, 1855); 12—C. exquisita Furtos, 1936; 13—C. furfuracea (Brady, 1886); 14— C. gibbera Furtos, 1936; 15—C. globula Furtos, 1933; 16—C. granadae (Hartmann, 1959); 17—C. inequivalva Turner, 1893; 18—C. inflata (Furtos, 1933); 19—C. inversa Klie, 1941; 20—C. javana G.W. Müller, 1906; 21—C. karamani Petkovski, 1976; 22—C. kerkyrensis (Klie, 1936); 23—C. konishii Smith & Kamiya, 2006; 24—C. kraepelini (G.W. Müller, 1903); 25— C. larensis (Hartmann, 1964); 26—C. lubeziensis Kovalenko, 1982; 27—C. maculata Hoff, 1942; 28—C. matzkeae Smith & Janz, 2008; 29—C. mediana Hoff, 1942; 30—C. minicapensis (Green, 1962); 31—C. minuta (Victor & Michael, 1975); 32— C. mons (Chambers, 1887); 33—C. obesa Sharpe, 1897; 34—C. nipponica Okubo, 1990; 35—C. obliqua Klie, 1939; 36—C. ophtalmica (Jurine, 1820) s.l.; 37—C. osburni (Furtos, 1933); 38—C. palustera Furtos, 1935; 39—C. polessica Kovalenko, 1982; 40—C. posterotuberculata Furtos, 1935; 41—C. pseudocrenulata Furtos, 1936; 42—C. pusilla Sars, 1896; 43—C. pustulosa Sharpe, 1897; 44—C. reptans Bronstein, 1928; 45—C. sharmai Battish, 1985; 46—C. sketi Petkovski, 1976; 47—C. spinifera Tressler, 1937; 48—C. subsala Redeke, 1936; 49—C. sywulae Meisch, 2000; 50—C. turneri Hoff, 1942	FIGURE 10. Distribution of the genus Cypria Zenker, 1854. 1—C. bicolor Petkovski & Meisch, 1994; 2—C. biwaense Okubo, 1990; 3—C. brevisetigera Cole, 1965; 4—C. cavernae Wagenleitner, 1990; 5—C. crenulata Sars, 1903; 6—C. curvifurcata Klie, 1923; 7—C. denticulata Daday, 1905; 8—C. dentifera Sharp, 1897; 9—C. devai Arora, 1932; 10—C. dumonti (Martens, 1982); 11—Cypria exsculpta (Fischer, 1855); 12—C. exquisita Furtos, 1936; 13—C. furfuracea (Brady, 1886); 14— C. gibbera Furtos, 1936; 15—C. globula Furtos, 1933; 16—C. granadae (Hartmann, 1959); 17—C. inequivalva Turner, 1893; 18—C. inflata (Furtos, 1933); 19—C. inversa Klie, 1941; 20—C. javana G.W. Müller, 1906; 21—C. karamani Petkovski, 1976; 22—C. kerkyrensis (Klie, 1936); 23—C. konishii Smith & Kamiya, 2006; 24—C. kraepelini (G.W. Müller, 1903); 25— C. larensis (Hartmann, 1964); 26—C. lubeziensis Kovalenko, 1982; 27—C. maculata Hoff, 1942; 28—C. matzkeae Smith & Janz, 2008; 29—C. mediana Hoff, 1942; 30—C. minicapensis (Green, 1962); 31—C. minuta (Victor & Michael, 1975); 32— C. mons (Chambers, 1887); 33—C. obesa Sharpe, 1897; 34—C. nipponica Okubo, 1990; 35—C. obliqua Klie, 1939; 36—C. ophtalmica (Jurine, 1820) s.l.; 37—C. osburni (Furtos, 1933); 38—C. palustera Furtos, 1935; 39—C. polessica Kovalenko, 1982; 40—C. posterotuberculata Furtos, 1935; 41—C. pseudocrenulata Furtos, 1936; 42—C. pusilla Sars, 1896; 43—C. pustulosa Sharpe, 1897; 44—C. reptans Bronstein, 1928; 45—C. sharmai Battish, 1985; 46—C. sketi Petkovski, 1976; 47—C. spinifera Tressler, 1937; 48—C. subsala Redeke, 1936; 49—C. sywulae Meisch, 2000; 50—C. turneri Hoff, 1942	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F77FFC5FF30FF7DA219724F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288985/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288985	FIGURE 11. Distribution of the genus Keysercypria gen. nov. 1—K. affinis (Klie, 1933); 2—K. circinata (Würdig & Pinto, 1993); 3—K. deformis (Klie, 1940); 4—K. longiseta (Klie, 1930); 5—K. obtusa (Klie, 1940); 6—K. pellucida (Sars, 1901); 7—K. sanctaeannae (Margalef, 1961); 8—K. schubarti (Farkas, 1958); 9—K. xanabanica (Furtos, 1936).	FIGURE 11. Distribution of the genus Keysercypria gen. nov. 1—K. affinis (Klie, 1933); 2—K. circinata (Würdig & Pinto, 1993); 3—K. deformis (Klie, 1940); 4—K. longiseta (Klie, 1930); 5—K. obtusa (Klie, 1940); 6—K. pellucida (Sars, 1901); 7—K. sanctaeannae (Margalef, 1961); 8—K. schubarti (Farkas, 1958); 9—K. xanabanica (Furtos, 1936).	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F4BFFF9FF30FF7DA6747320.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5496023/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5496023	FIGURE 15. Keysercypria longiseta (Klie, 1930). A-F, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 937a); G-I. paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 937b): A—last two segments of A2; B—last five segments of A1; C—hemipenis; D—T2; E—right prehensile palp; F—left prehensile palp; G—LV; H—RV, I—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. G-I modified after Klie (1930) and not to scale.	FIGURE 15. Keysercypria longiseta (Klie, 1930). A-F, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 937a); G-I. paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 937b): A—last two segments of A2; B—last five segments of A1; C—hemipenis; D—T2; E—right prehensile palp; F—left prehensile palp; G—LV; H—RV, I—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. G-I modified after Klie (1930) and not to scale.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F4BFFF9FF30FF7DA6747320.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288959/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288959	FIGURE 1. A, Cyclocypris washingtoniensis Dobbin, 1941, syntype (male, SMNH 335865); B, C, E, H, I, Cyclocypris sharpei Furtos, 1933, B, C, E Paratype (♂, SMNH 67879), H, I paratype (♂, SMNH 67920); D, F, G, C. cruciata Furtos, 1935 holotype (♂, SMNH 71416): A—left prehensile palp, B—T3, without basal segment, C—T2; D, E—UR, F—LV, interior view (valve broken), G—RV, interior view; H—LV, interior view; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 1. A, Cyclocypris washingtoniensis Dobbin, 1941, syntype (male, SMNH 335865); B, C, E, H, I, Cyclocypris sharpei Furtos, 1933, B, C, E Paratype (♂, SMNH 67879), H, I paratype (♂, SMNH 67920); D, F, G, C. cruciata Furtos, 1935 holotype (♂, SMNH 71416): A—left prehensile palp, B—T3, without basal segment, C—T2; D, E—UR, F—LV, interior view (valve broken), G—RV, interior view; H—LV, interior view; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F4BFFF9FF30FF7DA6747320.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288961/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288961	FIGURE 2. Cyclocypris pusilla Sars, 1895, type (NHMO F11355): A—carapace, dorsal view; B—carapace, exterior view from the left side (carapace slightly tilted); C—T2, D—UR; E—T3, withouth basal segment; F—hemipenis, outline only. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 2. Cyclocypris pusilla Sars, 1895, type (NHMO F11355): A—carapace, dorsal view; B—carapace, exterior view from the left side (carapace slightly tilted); C—T2, D—UR; E—T3, withouth basal segment; F—hemipenis, outline only. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F4BFFF9FF30FF7DA6747320.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288965/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288965	FIGURE 3. Distribution of the genus Cyclocypris Brady & Norman, 1889: 1—C. ampla Furtos, 1933; 2—C. brevisetosa Bronstein, 1928; 3—C. diebeli Absolon, 1978; 4—C. forbesi Sharpe, 1897; 5—C. globosa (Sars, 1863); 6—C. laevis (O.F. Müller, 1776); 7– C. mediosetosa Meisch, 1987; 8—C. modesta (Herrick, 1887); 9—C. nahcotta Dobbin, 1941; 10—C. ovum (Jurine, 1820); 11—C. pusilla Sars, 1895; 12—C. scrobiculata Klie, 1936; 13—C. serena (Koch, 1838); 14—C. sharpei Furtos, 1933; 15—C. vinyardi Külköylüoĝlu, 2008. Note: C. laevis and C. ovum are distributed in the entire Holarctic and the dotted line is only approximate distribution of the two species.	FIGURE 3. Distribution of the genus Cyclocypris Brady & Norman, 1889: 1—C. ampla Furtos, 1933; 2—C. brevisetosa Bronstein, 1928; 3—C. diebeli Absolon, 1978; 4—C. forbesi Sharpe, 1897; 5—C. globosa (Sars, 1863); 6—C. laevis (O.F. Müller, 1776); 7– C. mediosetosa Meisch, 1987; 8—C. modesta (Herrick, 1887); 9—C. nahcotta Dobbin, 1941; 10—C. ovum (Jurine, 1820); 11—C. pusilla Sars, 1895; 12—C. scrobiculata Klie, 1936; 13—C. serena (Koch, 1838); 14—C. sharpei Furtos, 1933; 15—C. vinyardi Külköylüoĝlu, 2008. Note: C. laevis and C. ovum are distributed in the entire Holarctic and the dotted line is only approximate distribution of the two species.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F4BFFF9FF30FF7DA6747320.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288967/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288967	FIGURE 4. Cypria karamani Petkovski, 1976: SEM-image, dorso/lateral view.	FIGURE 4. Cypria karamani Petkovski, 1976: SEM-image, dorso/lateral view.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F4BFFF9FF30FF7DA6747320.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288969/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288969	FIGURE 5. A–D, Cypria maculata Hoff, 1942, A, C holotype (♀, SMNH 81083), B, D allotype (♂, SMNH 81084); E-F, C. palustera Furtos, 1935, paratype (♂, SMNH 71410); G-I, Cypria spinifera Tressler, 1937, type (♀, SMNH 71504): A—LV, interior view; B—UR of ♂; C—UR and genital field of ♀: D, E—hemipenis (arrow on E showing well sclerotized parts); F, G—T2; H—UR and genital field of ♀; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 5. A–D, Cypria maculata Hoff, 1942, A, C holotype (♀, SMNH 81083), B, D allotype (♂, SMNH 81084); E-F, C. palustera Furtos, 1935, paratype (♂, SMNH 71410); G-I, Cypria spinifera Tressler, 1937, type (♀, SMNH 71504): A—LV, interior view; B—UR of ♂; C—UR and genital field of ♀: D, E—hemipenis (arrow on E showing well sclerotized parts); F, G—T2; H—UR and genital field of ♀; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F4BFFF9FF30FF7DA6747320.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288973/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288973	FIGURE 6. Cypria pustulosa Sharp, 1897, A, B, C, D, F, G, H (♂, SMNH 111402), E (♀, SMNH 111407): A—RV, interior view; B—LV, interior view; C—T2; D—hemipenis; E—UR and genital field; F—UR; G, H—prehensile palps. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 6. Cypria pustulosa Sharp, 1897, A, B, C, D, F, G, H (♂, SMNH 111402), E (♀, SMNH 111407): A—RV, interior view; B—LV, interior view; C—T2; D—hemipenis; E—UR and genital field; F—UR; G, H—prehensile palps. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F4BFFF9FF30FF7DA6747320.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288975/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288975	FIGURE 7. Cypria pusilla Sars, 1896 (NHMO F11601): A—carapace, exterior view from the left side (microphotograph); B—T2, C—A2; D—A1, not all setae drawn; E—T3; F—two terminal segments of Md-palp, without setae drawn. Scales for B- F = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 7. Cypria pusilla Sars, 1896 (NHMO F11601): A—carapace, exterior view from the left side (microphotograph); B—T2, C—A2; D—A1, not all setae drawn; E—T3; F—two terminal segments of Md-palp, without setae drawn. Scales for B- F = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F4BFFF9FF30FF7DA6747320.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288977/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288977	FIGURE 8. A, Cypria kerkyirensis (Klie, 1936), syntypes (♂, ZMH 539a); B-E, C. brevisetigera Cole, 1965, A, B, D, holotype (♀, SMNH 120555), C, allotype (♂, SMNH 120556): A—T2, without basal segment, showing the intermediate L of the seta “e”; B—UR; C—hemipenis, outline only; D—T2, without basal segment, showing the short seta “e”; E—T3, showing the absence of the “d2” seta. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 8. A, Cypria kerkyirensis (Klie, 1936), syntypes (♂, ZMH 539a); B-E, C. brevisetigera Cole, 1965, A, B, D, holotype (♀, SMNH 120555), C, allotype (♂, SMNH 120556): A—T2, without basal segment, showing the intermediate L of the seta “e”; B—UR; C—hemipenis, outline only; D—T2, without basal segment, showing the short seta “e”; E—T3, showing the absence of the “d2” seta. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F4BFFF9FF30FF7DA6747320.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288979/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288979	FIGURE 9. Digital photograph of original slides. A-C—C. koenikei Daday, 1910 (HNHM IV/P 106, 107); D—[not] Cypria lenticularis G.W. Müller, 1898 (HNHM IV/P 108); E, F—Physocypria castanea (Brady, 1904), ♀ (HNHM IV/P 104): A—Carapace, exterior view from the right side, RV partly broken; B—paired hemipenis; C, D - Zenker organ, showing the presence of numerous chitinous whorls of spines; E—T2, showing the presence of the “d1” seta; F—UR, proximal part not visible.	FIGURE 9. Digital photograph of original slides. A-C—C. koenikei Daday, 1910 (HNHM IV/P 106, 107); D—[not] Cypria lenticularis G.W. Müller, 1898 (HNHM IV/P 108); E, F—Physocypria castanea (Brady, 1904), ♀ (HNHM IV/P 104): A—Carapace, exterior view from the right side, RV partly broken; B—paired hemipenis; C, D - Zenker organ, showing the presence of numerous chitinous whorls of spines; E—T2, showing the presence of the “d1” seta; F—UR, proximal part not visible.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F4BFFFBFF30F943A0A477B6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289001/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289001	FIGURE 17. Keysercypria obtusa (Klie, 1940). A-E, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 524a); F-H, paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 524b): A— hemipenis; B—left prehensile palp; C—right prehensile palp; D—T3; E—T2; F—LV; G—RV; H—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. F-H modified after Klie (1940) and not to scale.	FIGURE 17. Keysercypria obtusa (Klie, 1940). A-E, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 524a); F-H, paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 524b): A— hemipenis; B—left prehensile palp; C—right prehensile palp; D—T3; E—T2; F—LV; G—RV; H—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. F-H modified after Klie (1940) and not to scale.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F4BFFFBFF30F943A0A477B6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289003/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289003	FIGURE 18. Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. A, D, E—allotype ♀; B, C—holotype ♂: A—carapace, dorsal view; B—LV interior view; C—RV, interior view; D—RV, exterior view; E—LV, exterior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 18. Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. A, D, E—allotype ♀; B, C—holotype ♂: A—carapace, dorsal view; B—LV interior view; C—RV, interior view; D—RV, exterior view; E—LV, exterior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F4BFFFBFF30F943A0A477B6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289007/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289007	FIGURE 19. SEM of Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. Paratype, ♀: A—Carapace, lateral view from right side; B—RV, interior view; C—terminal segment of Mxl palp; D—terminal segment of T3.	FIGURE 19. SEM of Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. Paratype, ♀: A—Carapace, lateral view from right side; B—RV, interior view; C—terminal segment of Mxl palp; D—terminal segment of T3.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F49FFFBFF30FCF5A7317276.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288999/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288999	FIGURE 16. A, B Keysercypria deformis (Klie, 1940). A, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 550); B, paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 550b); C-F— Keysercypria pellucida (Sars, 1901), ♀ (NHMO F11534): A—distal five segments of A1; B—UR; C—T3; D—UR; E—T2; F—carapace, lateral view from the right side. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 16. A, B Keysercypria deformis (Klie, 1940). A, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 550); B, paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 550b); C-F— Keysercypria pellucida (Sars, 1901), ♀ (NHMO F11534): A—distal five segments of A1; B—UR; C—T3; D—UR; E—T2; F—carapace, lateral view from the right side. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F49FFFBFF30FCF5A7317276.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288975/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288975	FIGURE 7. Cypria pusilla Sars, 1896 (NHMO F11601): A—carapace, exterior view from the left side (microphotograph); B—T2, C—A2; D—A1, not all setae drawn; E—T3; F—two terminal segments of Md-palp, without setae drawn. Scales for B- F = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 7. Cypria pusilla Sars, 1896 (NHMO F11601): A—carapace, exterior view from the left side (microphotograph); B—T2, C—A2; D—A1, not all setae drawn; E—T3; F—two terminal segments of Md-palp, without setae drawn. Scales for B- F = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F49FFFBFF30FCF5A7317276.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288977/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288977	FIGURE 8. A, Cypria kerkyirensis (Klie, 1936), syntypes (♂, ZMH 539a); B-E, C. brevisetigera Cole, 1965, A, B, D, holotype (♀, SMNH 120555), C, allotype (♂, SMNH 120556): A—T2, without basal segment, showing the intermediate L of the seta “e”; B—UR; C—hemipenis, outline only; D—T2, without basal segment, showing the short seta “e”; E—T3, showing the absence of the “d2” seta. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 8. A, Cypria kerkyirensis (Klie, 1936), syntypes (♂, ZMH 539a); B-E, C. brevisetigera Cole, 1965, A, B, D, holotype (♀, SMNH 120555), C, allotype (♂, SMNH 120556): A—T2, without basal segment, showing the intermediate L of the seta “e”; B—UR; C—hemipenis, outline only; D—T2, without basal segment, showing the short seta “e”; E—T3, showing the absence of the “d2” seta. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F49FFFBFF30FCF5A7317276.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288983/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288983	FIGURE 10. Distribution of the genus Cypria Zenker, 1854. 1—C. bicolor Petkovski & Meisch, 1994; 2—C. biwaense Okubo, 1990; 3—C. brevisetigera Cole, 1965; 4—C. cavernae Wagenleitner, 1990; 5—C. crenulata Sars, 1903; 6—C. curvifurcata Klie, 1923; 7—C. denticulata Daday, 1905; 8—C. dentifera Sharp, 1897; 9—C. devai Arora, 1932; 10—C. dumonti (Martens, 1982); 11—Cypria exsculpta (Fischer, 1855); 12—C. exquisita Furtos, 1936; 13—C. furfuracea (Brady, 1886); 14— C. gibbera Furtos, 1936; 15—C. globula Furtos, 1933; 16—C. granadae (Hartmann, 1959); 17—C. inequivalva Turner, 1893; 18—C. inflata (Furtos, 1933); 19—C. inversa Klie, 1941; 20—C. javana G.W. Müller, 1906; 21—C. karamani Petkovski, 1976; 22—C. kerkyrensis (Klie, 1936); 23—C. konishii Smith & Kamiya, 2006; 24—C. kraepelini (G.W. Müller, 1903); 25— C. larensis (Hartmann, 1964); 26—C. lubeziensis Kovalenko, 1982; 27—C. maculata Hoff, 1942; 28—C. matzkeae Smith & Janz, 2008; 29—C. mediana Hoff, 1942; 30—C. minicapensis (Green, 1962); 31—C. minuta (Victor & Michael, 1975); 32— C. mons (Chambers, 1887); 33—C. obesa Sharpe, 1897; 34—C. nipponica Okubo, 1990; 35—C. obliqua Klie, 1939; 36—C. ophtalmica (Jurine, 1820) s.l.; 37—C. osburni (Furtos, 1933); 38—C. palustera Furtos, 1935; 39—C. polessica Kovalenko, 1982; 40—C. posterotuberculata Furtos, 1935; 41—C. pseudocrenulata Furtos, 1936; 42—C. pusilla Sars, 1896; 43—C. pustulosa Sharpe, 1897; 44—C. reptans Bronstein, 1928; 45—C. sharmai Battish, 1985; 46—C. sketi Petkovski, 1976; 47—C. spinifera Tressler, 1937; 48—C. subsala Redeke, 1936; 49—C. sywulae Meisch, 2000; 50—C. turneri Hoff, 1942	FIGURE 10. Distribution of the genus Cypria Zenker, 1854. 1—C. bicolor Petkovski & Meisch, 1994; 2—C. biwaense Okubo, 1990; 3—C. brevisetigera Cole, 1965; 4—C. cavernae Wagenleitner, 1990; 5—C. crenulata Sars, 1903; 6—C. curvifurcata Klie, 1923; 7—C. denticulata Daday, 1905; 8—C. dentifera Sharp, 1897; 9—C. devai Arora, 1932; 10—C. dumonti (Martens, 1982); 11—Cypria exsculpta (Fischer, 1855); 12—C. exquisita Furtos, 1936; 13—C. furfuracea (Brady, 1886); 14— C. gibbera Furtos, 1936; 15—C. globula Furtos, 1933; 16—C. granadae (Hartmann, 1959); 17—C. inequivalva Turner, 1893; 18—C. inflata (Furtos, 1933); 19—C. inversa Klie, 1941; 20—C. javana G.W. Müller, 1906; 21—C. karamani Petkovski, 1976; 22—C. kerkyrensis (Klie, 1936); 23—C. konishii Smith & Kamiya, 2006; 24—C. kraepelini (G.W. Müller, 1903); 25— C. larensis (Hartmann, 1964); 26—C. lubeziensis Kovalenko, 1982; 27—C. maculata Hoff, 1942; 28—C. matzkeae Smith & Janz, 2008; 29—C. mediana Hoff, 1942; 30—C. minicapensis (Green, 1962); 31—C. minuta (Victor & Michael, 1975); 32— C. mons (Chambers, 1887); 33—C. obesa Sharpe, 1897; 34—C. nipponica Okubo, 1990; 35—C. obliqua Klie, 1939; 36—C. ophtalmica (Jurine, 1820) s.l.; 37—C. osburni (Furtos, 1933); 38—C. palustera Furtos, 1935; 39—C. polessica Kovalenko, 1982; 40—C. posterotuberculata Furtos, 1935; 41—C. pseudocrenulata Furtos, 1936; 42—C. pusilla Sars, 1896; 43—C. pustulosa Sharpe, 1897; 44—C. reptans Bronstein, 1928; 45—C. sharmai Battish, 1985; 46—C. sketi Petkovski, 1976; 47—C. spinifera Tressler, 1937; 48—C. subsala Redeke, 1936; 49—C. sywulae Meisch, 2000; 50—C. turneri Hoff, 1942	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F49FFFBFF30FCF5A7317276.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288985/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288985	FIGURE 11. Distribution of the genus Keysercypria gen. nov. 1—K. affinis (Klie, 1933); 2—K. circinata (Würdig & Pinto, 1993); 3—K. deformis (Klie, 1940); 4—K. longiseta (Klie, 1930); 5—K. obtusa (Klie, 1940); 6—K. pellucida (Sars, 1901); 7—K. sanctaeannae (Margalef, 1961); 8—K. schubarti (Farkas, 1958); 9—K. xanabanica (Furtos, 1936).	FIGURE 11. Distribution of the genus Keysercypria gen. nov. 1—K. affinis (Klie, 1933); 2—K. circinata (Würdig & Pinto, 1993); 3—K. deformis (Klie, 1940); 4—K. longiseta (Klie, 1930); 5—K. obtusa (Klie, 1940); 6—K. pellucida (Sars, 1901); 7—K. sanctaeannae (Margalef, 1961); 8—K. schubarti (Farkas, 1958); 9—K. xanabanica (Furtos, 1936).	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F49FFFBFF30FCF5A7317276.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288989/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288989	FIGURE 12. Keysercypria affinis (Klie, 1933). A-E, K—paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 538b); F-J—lectotype ♂ (ZMH 538a) A— Two terminal segments of A2; B—UR; C—LV: D—RV; E—carapace, dorsal view; F—distal four segments of A1; G—UR; H—proximal part of A1, not all setae drawn; I—Mxl-palp; J—right prehensile palp; K—terminal segment and claw of T2. Scales = 0.1 mm. C-D modified after Klie (1933), and not to scale.	FIGURE 12. Keysercypria affinis (Klie, 1933). A-E, K—paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 538b); F-J—lectotype ♂ (ZMH 538a) A— Two terminal segments of A2; B—UR; C—LV: D—RV; E—carapace, dorsal view; F—distal four segments of A1; G—UR; H—proximal part of A1, not all setae drawn; I—Mxl-palp; J—right prehensile palp; K—terminal segment and claw of T2. Scales = 0.1 mm. C-D modified after Klie (1933), and not to scale.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F49FFFBFF30FCF5A7317276.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288991/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288991	FIGURE 13. Keysercypria affinis (Klie, 1933). Lectotype ♂ (ZMH 538a): A—T3; B—T2 without terminal segment: C—basal and first endopodal segments of A2; D—right prehensile palp; E—penultimate and terminal segments of A2; F—hemipenis, only outline; G—terminal segment and terminal claw of T2. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 13. Keysercypria affinis (Klie, 1933). Lectotype ♂ (ZMH 538a): A—T3; B—T2 without terminal segment: C—basal and first endopodal segments of A2; D—right prehensile palp; E—penultimate and terminal segments of A2; F—hemipenis, only outline; G—terminal segment and terminal claw of T2. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F49FFFBFF30FCF5A7317276.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288995/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288995	FIGURE 14. Keysercypria deformis (Klie, 1940). A-E, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 550a), F-H paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 550b): A—last three segments of T2; B—last two segments of A2; C—right prehensile palp; D—left prehensile palp; E—hemipenis; F—UR; G—LV; H—RV: I—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. G-I modified after Klie (1940) and not to scale.	FIGURE 14. Keysercypria deformis (Klie, 1940). A-E, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 550a), F-H paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 550b): A—last three segments of T2; B—last two segments of A2; C—right prehensile palp; D—left prehensile palp; E—hemipenis; F—UR; G—LV; H—RV: I—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. G-I modified after Klie (1940) and not to scale.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F49FFFBFF30FCF5A7317276.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5496023/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5496023	FIGURE 15. Keysercypria longiseta (Klie, 1930). A-F, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 937a); G-I. paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 937b): A—last two segments of A2; B—last five segments of A1; C—hemipenis; D—T2; E—right prehensile palp; F—left prehensile palp; G—LV; H—RV, I—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. G-I modified after Klie (1930) and not to scale.	FIGURE 15. Keysercypria longiseta (Klie, 1930). A-F, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 937a); G-I. paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 937b): A—last two segments of A2; B—last five segments of A1; C—hemipenis; D—T2; E—right prehensile palp; F—left prehensile palp; G—LV; H—RV, I—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. G-I modified after Klie (1930) and not to scale.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F49FFFBFF30FCF5A7317276.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289001/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289001	FIGURE 17. Keysercypria obtusa (Klie, 1940). A-E, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 524a); F-H, paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 524b): A— hemipenis; B—left prehensile palp; C—right prehensile palp; D—T3; E—T2; F—LV; G—RV; H—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. F-H modified after Klie (1940) and not to scale.	FIGURE 17. Keysercypria obtusa (Klie, 1940). A-E, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 524a); F-H, paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 524b): A— hemipenis; B—left prehensile palp; C—right prehensile palp; D—T3; E—T2; F—LV; G—RV; H—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. F-H modified after Klie (1940) and not to scale.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F48FFF0FF30FC66A1AC7725.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289003/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289003	FIGURE 18. Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. A, D, E—allotype ♀; B, C—holotype ♂: A—carapace, dorsal view; B—LV interior view; C—RV, interior view; D—RV, exterior view; E—LV, exterior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 18. Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. A, D, E—allotype ♀; B, C—holotype ♂: A—carapace, dorsal view; B—LV interior view; C—RV, interior view; D—RV, exterior view; E—LV, exterior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F48FFF0FF30FC66A1AC7725.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289007/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289007	FIGURE 19. SEM of Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. Paratype, ♀: A—Carapace, lateral view from right side; B—RV, interior view; C—terminal segment of Mxl palp; D—terminal segment of T3.	FIGURE 19. SEM of Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. Paratype, ♀: A—Carapace, lateral view from right side; B—RV, interior view; C—terminal segment of Mxl palp; D—terminal segment of T3.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F48FFF0FF30FC66A1AC7725.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289009/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289009	FIGURE 20. Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. Holotype, ♂: A—Mxl palp; B—right prehensile palp: C—left prehensile palp: D—A1; E—rake-like organ. Scale = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 20. Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. Holotype, ♂: A—Mxl palp; B—right prehensile palp: C—left prehensile palp: D—A1; E—rake-like organ. Scale = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F48FFF0FF30FC66A1AC7725.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289013/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289013	FIGURE 21. Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. Holotype, ♂: A—UR; B—Md palp; C—attachment of UR; D— A2. Scale = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 21. Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. Holotype, ♂: A—UR; B—Md palp; C—attachment of UR; D— A2. Scale = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F48FFF0FF30FC66A1AC7725.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289015/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289015	FIGURE 22. Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. A, C, F—allotype, ♀; B, D, E—holotype, ♂: A—A2; B—T3; C— UR; D—hemipenis; E, F—T2, showing the variability in the L of the “e” seta. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 22. Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. A, C, F—allotype, ♀; B, D, E—holotype, ♂: A—A2; B—T3; C— UR; D—hemipenis; E, F—T2, showing the variability in the L of the “e” seta. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F42FFF2FF30FD46A2037746.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289029/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289029	FIGURE 26. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A, D—Type, ♀ (MNB 10011); B, C ♂ (ZMH 1242b): A—carapace, exterior view from left side; B—LV, interior view; C—carapace, exterior view from the right side; D—last two segments of A2. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 26. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A, D—Type, ♀ (MNB 10011); B, C ♂ (ZMH 1242b): A—carapace, exterior view from left side; B—LV, interior view; C—carapace, exterior view from the right side; D—last two segments of A2. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F42FFF2FF30FD46A2037746.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289041/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289041	FIGURE 30. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A, B—lectotype, ♀ (MNB 10011); A—Mxl; B—Md palp. Physocypria capensis Sars, 1895. C –♀ (ZMH 541), LV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 30. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A, B—lectotype, ♀ (MNB 10011); A—Mxl; B—Md palp. Physocypria capensis Sars, 1895. C –♀ (ZMH 541), LV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F42FFF2FF30FD46A2037746.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289035/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289035	FIGURE 28. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A—lectotype, ♀ (MNB 10011); B, C—♂ (ZMH 1242b): A—T1, B—T2; C— hemipenis; D—T1. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 28. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A—lectotype, ♀ (MNB 10011); B, C—♂ (ZMH 1242b): A—T1, B—T2; C— hemipenis; D—T1. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F42FFF2FF30FD46A2037746.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288979/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288979	FIGURE 9. Digital photograph of original slides. A-C—C. koenikei Daday, 1910 (HNHM IV/P 106, 107); D—[not] Cypria lenticularis G.W. Müller, 1898 (HNHM IV/P 108); E, F—Physocypria castanea (Brady, 1904), ♀ (HNHM IV/P 104): A—Carapace, exterior view from the right side, RV partly broken; B—paired hemipenis; C, D - Zenker organ, showing the presence of numerous chitinous whorls of spines; E—T2, showing the presence of the “d1” seta; F—UR, proximal part not visible.	FIGURE 9. Digital photograph of original slides. A-C—C. koenikei Daday, 1910 (HNHM IV/P 106, 107); D—[not] Cypria lenticularis G.W. Müller, 1898 (HNHM IV/P 108); E, F—Physocypria castanea (Brady, 1904), ♀ (HNHM IV/P 104): A—Carapace, exterior view from the right side, RV partly broken; B—paired hemipenis; C, D - Zenker organ, showing the presence of numerous chitinous whorls of spines; E—T2, showing the presence of the “d1” seta; F—UR, proximal part not visible.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F42FFF2FF30FD46A2037746.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289023/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289023	FIGURE 24. Distribution of Physocypria Vávra, 1897. 1—P. armata (G.W. Müller, 1898); 2—P. bullata Vávra, 1897; 3—P. capensis (Sars, 1895); 4—P. complanata (Sars, 1910); 5—P. dadayi (Daday, 1910); 6—P. declivis (Sars, 1910); 7—P. deflexa (Sars, 1910); 8—P. emaciata (Rome, 1962); 9—P. lata (Rome, 1962); 10—P. lenticularis (G.W. Müller, 1898); 11—P. limnalis (Rome, 1965); 12—P. obtusa (Sars, 1910); 13—P. opaca (Sars, 1910); 14—P. ovata (Rome, 1962); 15—P. parvula (Rome, 1962); 16—P. stricta (Rome, 1962); 17—P. subangulata (Sars, 1910); 18—P.tumidosa (Rome, 1962).	FIGURE 24. Distribution of Physocypria Vávra, 1897. 1—P. armata (G.W. Müller, 1898); 2—P. bullata Vávra, 1897; 3—P. capensis (Sars, 1895); 4—P. complanata (Sars, 1910); 5—P. dadayi (Daday, 1910); 6—P. declivis (Sars, 1910); 7—P. deflexa (Sars, 1910); 8—P. emaciata (Rome, 1962); 9—P. lata (Rome, 1962); 10—P. lenticularis (G.W. Müller, 1898); 11—P. limnalis (Rome, 1965); 12—P. obtusa (Sars, 1910); 13—P. opaca (Sars, 1910); 14—P. ovata (Rome, 1962); 15—P. parvula (Rome, 1962); 16—P. stricta (Rome, 1962); 17—P. subangulata (Sars, 1910); 18—P.tumidosa (Rome, 1962).	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F47FFEAFF30FA7DA7637725.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289027/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289027	FIGURE 25. SEM of Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897, male (ZMH 1242): A—open carapace; B—posterior margin of RV from interior, showing the presence of the marginal tubercles; C—two last segments of T3; D—left prehensile palp.	FIGURE 25. SEM of Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897, male (ZMH 1242): A—open carapace; B—posterior margin of RV from interior, showing the presence of the marginal tubercles; C—two last segments of T3; D—left prehensile palp.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F47FFEAFF30FA7DA7637725.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289029/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289029	FIGURE 26. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A, D—Type, ♀ (MNB 10011); B, C ♂ (ZMH 1242b): A—carapace, exterior view from left side; B—LV, interior view; C—carapace, exterior view from the right side; D—last two segments of A2. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 26. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A, D—Type, ♀ (MNB 10011); B, C ♂ (ZMH 1242b): A—carapace, exterior view from left side; B—LV, interior view; C—carapace, exterior view from the right side; D—last two segments of A2. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F47FFEAFF30FA7DA7637725.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289033/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289033	FIGURE 27. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A—♂ (ZMH 1242c); B, C—♂ (ZMH 1242b); D—lectotype, ♀ (MNB 10011): A—carapace, exterior view from right side; B—A2; C—prehensile palp; D—T3. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 27. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A—♂ (ZMH 1242c); B, C—♂ (ZMH 1242b); D—lectotype, ♀ (MNB 10011): A—carapace, exterior view from right side; B—A2; C—prehensile palp; D—T3. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F47FFEAFF30FA7DA7637725.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289035/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289035	FIGURE 28. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A—lectotype, ♀ (MNB 10011); B, C—♂ (ZMH 1242b): A—T1, B—T2; C— hemipenis; D—T1. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 28. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A—lectotype, ♀ (MNB 10011); B, C—♂ (ZMH 1242b): A—T1, B—T2; C— hemipenis; D—T1. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F47FFEAFF30FA7DA7637725.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289039/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289039	FIGURE 29. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A—♂ (ZMH 1242b); B, C, D—lectotype, ♀ (MNB 10011): A—UR; B—distal five segments of A1; C—UR; D—proximal two segments of A1. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 29. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A—♂ (ZMH 1242b); B, C, D—lectotype, ♀ (MNB 10011): A—UR; B—distal five segments of A1; C—UR; D—proximal two segments of A1. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F47FFEAFF30FA7DA7637725.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289041/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289041	FIGURE 30. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A, B—lectotype, ♀ (MNB 10011); A—Mxl; B—Md palp. Physocypria capensis Sars, 1895. C –♀ (ZMH 541), LV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 30. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A, B—lectotype, ♀ (MNB 10011); A—Mxl; B—Md palp. Physocypria capensis Sars, 1895. C –♀ (ZMH 541), LV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F47FFEAFF30FA7DA7637725.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288959/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288959	FIGURE 1. A, Cyclocypris washingtoniensis Dobbin, 1941, syntype (male, SMNH 335865); B, C, E, H, I, Cyclocypris sharpei Furtos, 1933, B, C, E Paratype (♂, SMNH 67879), H, I paratype (♂, SMNH 67920); D, F, G, C. cruciata Furtos, 1935 holotype (♂, SMNH 71416): A—left prehensile palp, B—T3, without basal segment, C—T2; D, E—UR, F—LV, interior view (valve broken), G—RV, interior view; H—LV, interior view; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 1. A, Cyclocypris washingtoniensis Dobbin, 1941, syntype (male, SMNH 335865); B, C, E, H, I, Cyclocypris sharpei Furtos, 1933, B, C, E Paratype (♂, SMNH 67879), H, I paratype (♂, SMNH 67920); D, F, G, C. cruciata Furtos, 1935 holotype (♂, SMNH 71416): A—left prehensile palp, B—T3, without basal segment, C—T2; D, E—UR, F—LV, interior view (valve broken), G—RV, interior view; H—LV, interior view; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F47FFEAFF30FA7DA7637725.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288961/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288961	FIGURE 2. Cyclocypris pusilla Sars, 1895, type (NHMO F11355): A—carapace, dorsal view; B—carapace, exterior view from the left side (carapace slightly tilted); C—T2, D—UR; E—T3, withouth basal segment; F—hemipenis, outline only. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 2. Cyclocypris pusilla Sars, 1895, type (NHMO F11355): A—carapace, dorsal view; B—carapace, exterior view from the left side (carapace slightly tilted); C—T2, D—UR; E—T3, withouth basal segment; F—hemipenis, outline only. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F47FFEAFF30FA7DA7637725.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288965/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288965	FIGURE 3. Distribution of the genus Cyclocypris Brady & Norman, 1889: 1—C. ampla Furtos, 1933; 2—C. brevisetosa Bronstein, 1928; 3—C. diebeli Absolon, 1978; 4—C. forbesi Sharpe, 1897; 5—C. globosa (Sars, 1863); 6—C. laevis (O.F. Müller, 1776); 7– C. mediosetosa Meisch, 1987; 8—C. modesta (Herrick, 1887); 9—C. nahcotta Dobbin, 1941; 10—C. ovum (Jurine, 1820); 11—C. pusilla Sars, 1895; 12—C. scrobiculata Klie, 1936; 13—C. serena (Koch, 1838); 14—C. sharpei Furtos, 1933; 15—C. vinyardi Külköylüoĝlu, 2008. Note: C. laevis and C. ovum are distributed in the entire Holarctic and the dotted line is only approximate distribution of the two species.	FIGURE 3. Distribution of the genus Cyclocypris Brady & Norman, 1889: 1—C. ampla Furtos, 1933; 2—C. brevisetosa Bronstein, 1928; 3—C. diebeli Absolon, 1978; 4—C. forbesi Sharpe, 1897; 5—C. globosa (Sars, 1863); 6—C. laevis (O.F. Müller, 1776); 7– C. mediosetosa Meisch, 1987; 8—C. modesta (Herrick, 1887); 9—C. nahcotta Dobbin, 1941; 10—C. ovum (Jurine, 1820); 11—C. pusilla Sars, 1895; 12—C. scrobiculata Klie, 1936; 13—C. serena (Koch, 1838); 14—C. sharpei Furtos, 1933; 15—C. vinyardi Külköylüoĝlu, 2008. Note: C. laevis and C. ovum are distributed in the entire Holarctic and the dotted line is only approximate distribution of the two species.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F47FFEAFF30FA7DA7637725.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288967/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288967	FIGURE 4. Cypria karamani Petkovski, 1976: SEM-image, dorso/lateral view.	FIGURE 4. Cypria karamani Petkovski, 1976: SEM-image, dorso/lateral view.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F47FFEAFF30FA7DA7637725.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288969/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288969	FIGURE 5. A–D, Cypria maculata Hoff, 1942, A, C holotype (♀, SMNH 81083), B, D allotype (♂, SMNH 81084); E-F, C. palustera Furtos, 1935, paratype (♂, SMNH 71410); G-I, Cypria spinifera Tressler, 1937, type (♀, SMNH 71504): A—LV, interior view; B—UR of ♂; C—UR and genital field of ♀: D, E—hemipenis (arrow on E showing well sclerotized parts); F, G—T2; H—UR and genital field of ♀; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 5. A–D, Cypria maculata Hoff, 1942, A, C holotype (♀, SMNH 81083), B, D allotype (♂, SMNH 81084); E-F, C. palustera Furtos, 1935, paratype (♂, SMNH 71410); G-I, Cypria spinifera Tressler, 1937, type (♀, SMNH 71504): A—LV, interior view; B—UR of ♂; C—UR and genital field of ♀: D, E—hemipenis (arrow on E showing well sclerotized parts); F, G—T2; H—UR and genital field of ♀; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289039/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289039	FIGURE 29. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A—♂ (ZMH 1242b); B, C, D—lectotype, ♀ (MNB 10011): A—UR; B—distal five segments of A1; C—UR; D—proximal two segments of A1. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 29. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A—♂ (ZMH 1242b); B, C, D—lectotype, ♀ (MNB 10011): A—UR; B—distal five segments of A1; C—UR; D—proximal two segments of A1. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289041/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289041	FIGURE 30. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A, B—lectotype, ♀ (MNB 10011); A—Mxl; B—Md palp. Physocypria capensis Sars, 1895. C –♀ (ZMH 541), LV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 30. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A, B—lectotype, ♀ (MNB 10011); A—Mxl; B—Md palp. Physocypria capensis Sars, 1895. C –♀ (ZMH 541), LV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288959/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288959	FIGURE 1. A, Cyclocypris washingtoniensis Dobbin, 1941, syntype (male, SMNH 335865); B, C, E, H, I, Cyclocypris sharpei Furtos, 1933, B, C, E Paratype (♂, SMNH 67879), H, I paratype (♂, SMNH 67920); D, F, G, C. cruciata Furtos, 1935 holotype (♂, SMNH 71416): A—left prehensile palp, B—T3, without basal segment, C—T2; D, E—UR, F—LV, interior view (valve broken), G—RV, interior view; H—LV, interior view; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 1. A, Cyclocypris washingtoniensis Dobbin, 1941, syntype (male, SMNH 335865); B, C, E, H, I, Cyclocypris sharpei Furtos, 1933, B, C, E Paratype (♂, SMNH 67879), H, I paratype (♂, SMNH 67920); D, F, G, C. cruciata Furtos, 1935 holotype (♂, SMNH 71416): A—left prehensile palp, B—T3, without basal segment, C—T2; D, E—UR, F—LV, interior view (valve broken), G—RV, interior view; H—LV, interior view; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288961/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288961	FIGURE 2. Cyclocypris pusilla Sars, 1895, type (NHMO F11355): A—carapace, dorsal view; B—carapace, exterior view from the left side (carapace slightly tilted); C—T2, D—UR; E—T3, withouth basal segment; F—hemipenis, outline only. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 2. Cyclocypris pusilla Sars, 1895, type (NHMO F11355): A—carapace, dorsal view; B—carapace, exterior view from the left side (carapace slightly tilted); C—T2, D—UR; E—T3, withouth basal segment; F—hemipenis, outline only. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288965/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288965	FIGURE 3. Distribution of the genus Cyclocypris Brady & Norman, 1889: 1—C. ampla Furtos, 1933; 2—C. brevisetosa Bronstein, 1928; 3—C. diebeli Absolon, 1978; 4—C. forbesi Sharpe, 1897; 5—C. globosa (Sars, 1863); 6—C. laevis (O.F. Müller, 1776); 7– C. mediosetosa Meisch, 1987; 8—C. modesta (Herrick, 1887); 9—C. nahcotta Dobbin, 1941; 10—C. ovum (Jurine, 1820); 11—C. pusilla Sars, 1895; 12—C. scrobiculata Klie, 1936; 13—C. serena (Koch, 1838); 14—C. sharpei Furtos, 1933; 15—C. vinyardi Külköylüoĝlu, 2008. Note: C. laevis and C. ovum are distributed in the entire Holarctic and the dotted line is only approximate distribution of the two species.	FIGURE 3. Distribution of the genus Cyclocypris Brady & Norman, 1889: 1—C. ampla Furtos, 1933; 2—C. brevisetosa Bronstein, 1928; 3—C. diebeli Absolon, 1978; 4—C. forbesi Sharpe, 1897; 5—C. globosa (Sars, 1863); 6—C. laevis (O.F. Müller, 1776); 7– C. mediosetosa Meisch, 1987; 8—C. modesta (Herrick, 1887); 9—C. nahcotta Dobbin, 1941; 10—C. ovum (Jurine, 1820); 11—C. pusilla Sars, 1895; 12—C. scrobiculata Klie, 1936; 13—C. serena (Koch, 1838); 14—C. sharpei Furtos, 1933; 15—C. vinyardi Külköylüoĝlu, 2008. Note: C. laevis and C. ovum are distributed in the entire Holarctic and the dotted line is only approximate distribution of the two species.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288967/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288967	FIGURE 4. Cypria karamani Petkovski, 1976: SEM-image, dorso/lateral view.	FIGURE 4. Cypria karamani Petkovski, 1976: SEM-image, dorso/lateral view.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288969/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288969	FIGURE 5. A–D, Cypria maculata Hoff, 1942, A, C holotype (♀, SMNH 81083), B, D allotype (♂, SMNH 81084); E-F, C. palustera Furtos, 1935, paratype (♂, SMNH 71410); G-I, Cypria spinifera Tressler, 1937, type (♀, SMNH 71504): A—LV, interior view; B—UR of ♂; C—UR and genital field of ♀: D, E—hemipenis (arrow on E showing well sclerotized parts); F, G—T2; H—UR and genital field of ♀; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 5. A–D, Cypria maculata Hoff, 1942, A, C holotype (♀, SMNH 81083), B, D allotype (♂, SMNH 81084); E-F, C. palustera Furtos, 1935, paratype (♂, SMNH 71410); G-I, Cypria spinifera Tressler, 1937, type (♀, SMNH 71504): A—LV, interior view; B—UR of ♂; C—UR and genital field of ♀: D, E—hemipenis (arrow on E showing well sclerotized parts); F, G—T2; H—UR and genital field of ♀; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288973/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288973	FIGURE 6. Cypria pustulosa Sharp, 1897, A, B, C, D, F, G, H (♂, SMNH 111402), E (♀, SMNH 111407): A—RV, interior view; B—LV, interior view; C—T2; D—hemipenis; E—UR and genital field; F—UR; G, H—prehensile palps. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 6. Cypria pustulosa Sharp, 1897, A, B, C, D, F, G, H (♂, SMNH 111402), E (♀, SMNH 111407): A—RV, interior view; B—LV, interior view; C—T2; D—hemipenis; E—UR and genital field; F—UR; G, H—prehensile palps. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288975/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288975	FIGURE 7. Cypria pusilla Sars, 1896 (NHMO F11601): A—carapace, exterior view from the left side (microphotograph); B—T2, C—A2; D—A1, not all setae drawn; E—T3; F—two terminal segments of Md-palp, without setae drawn. Scales for B- F = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 7. Cypria pusilla Sars, 1896 (NHMO F11601): A—carapace, exterior view from the left side (microphotograph); B—T2, C—A2; D—A1, not all setae drawn; E—T3; F—two terminal segments of Md-palp, without setae drawn. Scales for B- F = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288977/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288977	FIGURE 8. A, Cypria kerkyirensis (Klie, 1936), syntypes (♂, ZMH 539a); B-E, C. brevisetigera Cole, 1965, A, B, D, holotype (♀, SMNH 120555), C, allotype (♂, SMNH 120556): A—T2, without basal segment, showing the intermediate L of the seta “e”; B—UR; C—hemipenis, outline only; D—T2, without basal segment, showing the short seta “e”; E—T3, showing the absence of the “d2” seta. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 8. A, Cypria kerkyirensis (Klie, 1936), syntypes (♂, ZMH 539a); B-E, C. brevisetigera Cole, 1965, A, B, D, holotype (♀, SMNH 120555), C, allotype (♂, SMNH 120556): A—T2, without basal segment, showing the intermediate L of the seta “e”; B—UR; C—hemipenis, outline only; D—T2, without basal segment, showing the short seta “e”; E—T3, showing the absence of the “d2” seta. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288979/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288979	FIGURE 9. Digital photograph of original slides. A-C—C. koenikei Daday, 1910 (HNHM IV/P 106, 107); D—[not] Cypria lenticularis G.W. Müller, 1898 (HNHM IV/P 108); E, F—Physocypria castanea (Brady, 1904), ♀ (HNHM IV/P 104): A—Carapace, exterior view from the right side, RV partly broken; B—paired hemipenis; C, D - Zenker organ, showing the presence of numerous chitinous whorls of spines; E—T2, showing the presence of the “d1” seta; F—UR, proximal part not visible.	FIGURE 9. Digital photograph of original slides. A-C—C. koenikei Daday, 1910 (HNHM IV/P 106, 107); D—[not] Cypria lenticularis G.W. Müller, 1898 (HNHM IV/P 108); E, F—Physocypria castanea (Brady, 1904), ♀ (HNHM IV/P 104): A—Carapace, exterior view from the right side, RV partly broken; B—paired hemipenis; C, D - Zenker organ, showing the presence of numerous chitinous whorls of spines; E—T2, showing the presence of the “d1” seta; F—UR, proximal part not visible.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288983/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288983	FIGURE 10. Distribution of the genus Cypria Zenker, 1854. 1—C. bicolor Petkovski & Meisch, 1994; 2—C. biwaense Okubo, 1990; 3—C. brevisetigera Cole, 1965; 4—C. cavernae Wagenleitner, 1990; 5—C. crenulata Sars, 1903; 6—C. curvifurcata Klie, 1923; 7—C. denticulata Daday, 1905; 8—C. dentifera Sharp, 1897; 9—C. devai Arora, 1932; 10—C. dumonti (Martens, 1982); 11—Cypria exsculpta (Fischer, 1855); 12—C. exquisita Furtos, 1936; 13—C. furfuracea (Brady, 1886); 14— C. gibbera Furtos, 1936; 15—C. globula Furtos, 1933; 16—C. granadae (Hartmann, 1959); 17—C. inequivalva Turner, 1893; 18—C. inflata (Furtos, 1933); 19—C. inversa Klie, 1941; 20—C. javana G.W. Müller, 1906; 21—C. karamani Petkovski, 1976; 22—C. kerkyrensis (Klie, 1936); 23—C. konishii Smith & Kamiya, 2006; 24—C. kraepelini (G.W. Müller, 1903); 25— C. larensis (Hartmann, 1964); 26—C. lubeziensis Kovalenko, 1982; 27—C. maculata Hoff, 1942; 28—C. matzkeae Smith & Janz, 2008; 29—C. mediana Hoff, 1942; 30—C. minicapensis (Green, 1962); 31—C. minuta (Victor & Michael, 1975); 32— C. mons (Chambers, 1887); 33—C. obesa Sharpe, 1897; 34—C. nipponica Okubo, 1990; 35—C. obliqua Klie, 1939; 36—C. ophtalmica (Jurine, 1820) s.l.; 37—C. osburni (Furtos, 1933); 38—C. palustera Furtos, 1935; 39—C. polessica Kovalenko, 1982; 40—C. posterotuberculata Furtos, 1935; 41—C. pseudocrenulata Furtos, 1936; 42—C. pusilla Sars, 1896; 43—C. pustulosa Sharpe, 1897; 44—C. reptans Bronstein, 1928; 45—C. sharmai Battish, 1985; 46—C. sketi Petkovski, 1976; 47—C. spinifera Tressler, 1937; 48—C. subsala Redeke, 1936; 49—C. sywulae Meisch, 2000; 50—C. turneri Hoff, 1942	FIGURE 10. Distribution of the genus Cypria Zenker, 1854. 1—C. bicolor Petkovski & Meisch, 1994; 2—C. biwaense Okubo, 1990; 3—C. brevisetigera Cole, 1965; 4—C. cavernae Wagenleitner, 1990; 5—C. crenulata Sars, 1903; 6—C. curvifurcata Klie, 1923; 7—C. denticulata Daday, 1905; 8—C. dentifera Sharp, 1897; 9—C. devai Arora, 1932; 10—C. dumonti (Martens, 1982); 11—Cypria exsculpta (Fischer, 1855); 12—C. exquisita Furtos, 1936; 13—C. furfuracea (Brady, 1886); 14— C. gibbera Furtos, 1936; 15—C. globula Furtos, 1933; 16—C. granadae (Hartmann, 1959); 17—C. inequivalva Turner, 1893; 18—C. inflata (Furtos, 1933); 19—C. inversa Klie, 1941; 20—C. javana G.W. Müller, 1906; 21—C. karamani Petkovski, 1976; 22—C. kerkyrensis (Klie, 1936); 23—C. konishii Smith & Kamiya, 2006; 24—C. kraepelini (G.W. Müller, 1903); 25— C. larensis (Hartmann, 1964); 26—C. lubeziensis Kovalenko, 1982; 27—C. maculata Hoff, 1942; 28—C. matzkeae Smith & Janz, 2008; 29—C. mediana Hoff, 1942; 30—C. minicapensis (Green, 1962); 31—C. minuta (Victor & Michael, 1975); 32— C. mons (Chambers, 1887); 33—C. obesa Sharpe, 1897; 34—C. nipponica Okubo, 1990; 35—C. obliqua Klie, 1939; 36—C. ophtalmica (Jurine, 1820) s.l.; 37—C. osburni (Furtos, 1933); 38—C. palustera Furtos, 1935; 39—C. polessica Kovalenko, 1982; 40—C. posterotuberculata Furtos, 1935; 41—C. pseudocrenulata Furtos, 1936; 42—C. pusilla Sars, 1896; 43—C. pustulosa Sharpe, 1897; 44—C. reptans Bronstein, 1928; 45—C. sharmai Battish, 1985; 46—C. sketi Petkovski, 1976; 47—C. spinifera Tressler, 1937; 48—C. subsala Redeke, 1936; 49—C. sywulae Meisch, 2000; 50—C. turneri Hoff, 1942	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289029/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289029	FIGURE 26. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A, D—Type, ♀ (MNB 10011); B, C ♂ (ZMH 1242b): A—carapace, exterior view from left side; B—LV, interior view; C—carapace, exterior view from the right side; D—last two segments of A2. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 26. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A, D—Type, ♀ (MNB 10011); B, C ♂ (ZMH 1242b): A—carapace, exterior view from left side; B—LV, interior view; C—carapace, exterior view from the right side; D—last two segments of A2. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289015/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289015	FIGURE 22. Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. A, C, F—allotype, ♀; B, D, E—holotype, ♂: A—A2; B—T3; C— UR; D—hemipenis; E, F—T2, showing the variability in the L of the “e” seta. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 22. Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. A, C, F—allotype, ♀; B, D, E—holotype, ♂: A—A2; B—T3; C— UR; D—hemipenis; E, F—T2, showing the variability in the L of the “e” seta. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289019/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289019	FIGURE 23. Physocypria obtusa (Sars, 1910). ♀ (RBINS O.C. 519a, b): A—LV, exterior view; B—detail of the anterior margin of the RV; C—A2; D—T2; E—UR; F—A1. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 23. Physocypria obtusa (Sars, 1910). ♀ (RBINS O.C. 519a, b): A—LV, exterior view; B—detail of the anterior margin of the RV; C—A2; D—T2; E—UR; F—A1. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289033/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289033	FIGURE 27. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A—♂ (ZMH 1242c); B, C—♂ (ZMH 1242b); D—lectotype, ♀ (MNB 10011): A—carapace, exterior view from right side; B—A2; C—prehensile palp; D—T3. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 27. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A—♂ (ZMH 1242c); B, C—♂ (ZMH 1242b); D—lectotype, ♀ (MNB 10011): A—carapace, exterior view from right side; B—A2; C—prehensile palp; D—T3. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289035/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289035	FIGURE 28. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A—lectotype, ♀ (MNB 10011); B, C—♂ (ZMH 1242b): A—T1, B—T2; C— hemipenis; D—T1. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 28. Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897. A—lectotype, ♀ (MNB 10011); B, C—♂ (ZMH 1242b): A—T1, B—T2; C— hemipenis; D—T1. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289023/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289023	FIGURE 24. Distribution of Physocypria Vávra, 1897. 1—P. armata (G.W. Müller, 1898); 2—P. bullata Vávra, 1897; 3—P. capensis (Sars, 1895); 4—P. complanata (Sars, 1910); 5—P. dadayi (Daday, 1910); 6—P. declivis (Sars, 1910); 7—P. deflexa (Sars, 1910); 8—P. emaciata (Rome, 1962); 9—P. lata (Rome, 1962); 10—P. lenticularis (G.W. Müller, 1898); 11—P. limnalis (Rome, 1965); 12—P. obtusa (Sars, 1910); 13—P. opaca (Sars, 1910); 14—P. ovata (Rome, 1962); 15—P. parvula (Rome, 1962); 16—P. stricta (Rome, 1962); 17—P. subangulata (Sars, 1910); 18—P.tumidosa (Rome, 1962).	FIGURE 24. Distribution of Physocypria Vávra, 1897. 1—P. armata (G.W. Müller, 1898); 2—P. bullata Vávra, 1897; 3—P. capensis (Sars, 1895); 4—P. complanata (Sars, 1910); 5—P. dadayi (Daday, 1910); 6—P. declivis (Sars, 1910); 7—P. deflexa (Sars, 1910); 8—P. emaciata (Rome, 1962); 9—P. lata (Rome, 1962); 10—P. lenticularis (G.W. Müller, 1898); 11—P. limnalis (Rome, 1965); 12—P. obtusa (Sars, 1910); 13—P. opaca (Sars, 1910); 14—P. ovata (Rome, 1962); 15—P. parvula (Rome, 1962); 16—P. stricta (Rome, 1962); 17—P. subangulata (Sars, 1910); 18—P.tumidosa (Rome, 1962).	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289027/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289027	FIGURE 25. SEM of Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897, male (ZMH 1242): A—open carapace; B—posterior margin of RV from interior, showing the presence of the marginal tubercles; C—two last segments of T3; D—left prehensile palp.	FIGURE 25. SEM of Physocypria bullata Vávra, 1897, male (ZMH 1242): A—open carapace; B—posterior margin of RV from interior, showing the presence of the marginal tubercles; C—two last segments of T3; D—left prehensile palp.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288985/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288985	FIGURE 11. Distribution of the genus Keysercypria gen. nov. 1—K. affinis (Klie, 1933); 2—K. circinata (Würdig & Pinto, 1993); 3—K. deformis (Klie, 1940); 4—K. longiseta (Klie, 1930); 5—K. obtusa (Klie, 1940); 6—K. pellucida (Sars, 1901); 7—K. sanctaeannae (Margalef, 1961); 8—K. schubarti (Farkas, 1958); 9—K. xanabanica (Furtos, 1936).	FIGURE 11. Distribution of the genus Keysercypria gen. nov. 1—K. affinis (Klie, 1933); 2—K. circinata (Würdig & Pinto, 1993); 3—K. deformis (Klie, 1940); 4—K. longiseta (Klie, 1930); 5—K. obtusa (Klie, 1940); 6—K. pellucida (Sars, 1901); 7—K. sanctaeannae (Margalef, 1961); 8—K. schubarti (Farkas, 1958); 9—K. xanabanica (Furtos, 1936).	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289003/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289003	FIGURE 18. Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. A, D, E—allotype ♀; B, C—holotype ♂: A—carapace, dorsal view; B—LV interior view; C—RV, interior view; D—RV, exterior view; E—LV, exterior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 18. Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. A, D, E—allotype ♀; B, C—holotype ♂: A—carapace, dorsal view; B—LV interior view; C—RV, interior view; D—RV, exterior view; E—LV, exterior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289007/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289007	FIGURE 19. SEM of Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. Paratype, ♀: A—Carapace, lateral view from right side; B—RV, interior view; C—terminal segment of Mxl palp; D—terminal segment of T3.	FIGURE 19. SEM of Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. Paratype, ♀: A—Carapace, lateral view from right side; B—RV, interior view; C—terminal segment of Mxl palp; D—terminal segment of T3.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288991/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288991	FIGURE 13. Keysercypria affinis (Klie, 1933). Lectotype ♂ (ZMH 538a): A—T3; B—T2 without terminal segment: C—basal and first endopodal segments of A2; D—right prehensile palp; E—penultimate and terminal segments of A2; F—hemipenis, only outline; G—terminal segment and terminal claw of T2. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 13. Keysercypria affinis (Klie, 1933). Lectotype ♂ (ZMH 538a): A—T3; B—T2 without terminal segment: C—basal and first endopodal segments of A2; D—right prehensile palp; E—penultimate and terminal segments of A2; F—hemipenis, only outline; G—terminal segment and terminal claw of T2. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288989/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288989	FIGURE 12. Keysercypria affinis (Klie, 1933). A-E, K—paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 538b); F-J—lectotype ♂ (ZMH 538a) A— Two terminal segments of A2; B—UR; C—LV: D—RV; E—carapace, dorsal view; F—distal four segments of A1; G—UR; H—proximal part of A1, not all setae drawn; I—Mxl-palp; J—right prehensile palp; K—terminal segment and claw of T2. Scales = 0.1 mm. C-D modified after Klie (1933), and not to scale.	FIGURE 12. Keysercypria affinis (Klie, 1933). A-E, K—paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 538b); F-J—lectotype ♂ (ZMH 538a) A— Two terminal segments of A2; B—UR; C—LV: D—RV; E—carapace, dorsal view; F—distal four segments of A1; G—UR; H—proximal part of A1, not all setae drawn; I—Mxl-palp; J—right prehensile palp; K—terminal segment and claw of T2. Scales = 0.1 mm. C-D modified after Klie (1933), and not to scale.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288995/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288995	FIGURE 14. Keysercypria deformis (Klie, 1940). A-E, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 550a), F-H paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 550b): A—last three segments of T2; B—last two segments of A2; C—right prehensile palp; D—left prehensile palp; E—hemipenis; F—UR; G—LV; H—RV: I—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. G-I modified after Klie (1940) and not to scale.	FIGURE 14. Keysercypria deformis (Klie, 1940). A-E, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 550a), F-H paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 550b): A—last three segments of T2; B—last two segments of A2; C—right prehensile palp; D—left prehensile palp; E—hemipenis; F—UR; G—LV; H—RV: I—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. G-I modified after Klie (1940) and not to scale.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5496023/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5496023	FIGURE 15. Keysercypria longiseta (Klie, 1930). A-F, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 937a); G-I. paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 937b): A—last two segments of A2; B—last five segments of A1; C—hemipenis; D—T2; E—right prehensile palp; F—left prehensile palp; G—LV; H—RV, I—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. G-I modified after Klie (1930) and not to scale.	FIGURE 15. Keysercypria longiseta (Klie, 1930). A-F, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 937a); G-I. paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 937b): A—last two segments of A2; B—last five segments of A1; C—hemipenis; D—T2; E—right prehensile palp; F—left prehensile palp; G—LV; H—RV, I—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. G-I modified after Klie (1930) and not to scale.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5288999/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5288999	FIGURE 16. A, B Keysercypria deformis (Klie, 1940). A, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 550); B, paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 550b); C-F— Keysercypria pellucida (Sars, 1901), ♀ (NHMO F11534): A—distal five segments of A1; B—UR; C—T3; D—UR; E—T2; F—carapace, lateral view from the right side. Scales = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 16. A, B Keysercypria deformis (Klie, 1940). A, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 550); B, paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 550b); C-F— Keysercypria pellucida (Sars, 1901), ♀ (NHMO F11534): A—distal five segments of A1; B—UR; C—T3; D—UR; E—T2; F—carapace, lateral view from the right side. Scales = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289001/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289001	FIGURE 17. Keysercypria obtusa (Klie, 1940). A-E, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 524a); F-H, paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 524b): A— hemipenis; B—left prehensile palp; C—right prehensile palp; D—T3; E—T2; F—LV; G—RV; H—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. F-H modified after Klie (1940) and not to scale.	FIGURE 17. Keysercypria obtusa (Klie, 1940). A-E, lectotype ♂ (ZMH 524a); F-H, paralectotype ♀ (ZMH 524b): A— hemipenis; B—left prehensile palp; C—right prehensile palp; D—T3; E—T2; F—LV; G—RV; H—carapace, dorsal view. Scales = 0.1 mm. F-H modified after Klie (1940) and not to scale.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289009/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289009	FIGURE 20. Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. Holotype, ♂: A—Mxl palp; B—right prehensile palp: C—left prehensile palp: D—A1; E—rake-like organ. Scale = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 20. Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. Holotype, ♂: A—Mxl palp; B—right prehensile palp: C—left prehensile palp: D—A1; E—rake-like organ. Scale = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
03EB87C86F5FFFE1FF30FAB5A1ED70E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5289013/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5289013	FIGURE 21. Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. Holotype, ♂: A—UR; B—Md palp; C—attachment of UR; D— A2. Scale = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 21. Kempfcyclocypris australis gen. nov. sp. nov. Holotype, ♂: A—UR; B—Md palp; C—attachment of UR; D— A2. Scale = 0.1 mm.	2011-04-14	Karanovic, Ivana		Zenodo	biologists	Karanovic, Ivana			
