identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03E94926FFDDFFA30A63FCE03DADF9E8.text	03E94926FFDDFFA30A63FCE03DADF9E8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ityphilus COOK 1899	<div><p>Genus Ityphilus Cook, 1899</p> <p>Type species of the genus: Ityphilus lilacinus Cook, 1899, by original designation.</p> <p>Neotropical species currently included in the genus: I. betschi Pereira, 2010 (French Guiana); I. calinus Chamberlin, 1957 (Colombia); I. cavernicolus (Matic, Negrea &amp; Fundora Martinez, 1977) (Cuba); I. ceibanus Chamberlin, 1922 (Honduras); I. crabilli Pereira, Minelli &amp; Barbieri, 1994 (Brazil); I. demoraisi Pereira, Minelli &amp; Barbieri, 1995 (Brazil); I. grandis (Turk, 1955) (Peru); I. guianensis Chamberlin, 1921 (Guyana, Trinidad, Brazil); I. idanus Crabill, 1960 (British West Indies: Barbuda); I. krausi Pereira &amp; Minelli, 1996 (Peru); I. lilacinus Cook, 1899 (Bahama Islands: South Bimini, Cuba, Puerto Rico, USA); I. mauriesi Demange &amp; Pereira, 1985 (French Antilles: Guadeloupe); I. palidus (Matic, Negrea &amp; Fundora Martinez, 1977) (Cuba); I. perrieri (Brölemann, 1909) (Brazil); I. polypus (Matic, Negrea &amp; Fundora Martinez, 1977) (Cuba); I. saucius Pereira, Foddai &amp; Minelli, 2000 (Brazil); I. savannus Chamberlin, 1943 (Mexico); I. sensibilis Pereira, Foddai &amp; Minelli, 2000 (Brazil).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E94926FFDDFFA30A63FCE03DADF9E8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Pereira, Luis Alberto	Pereira, Luis Alberto (2012): A New Dwarf Species, New Distribution Records, And Supplementary Descriptive Notes Of The Centipede Genus Ityphilus Cook, 1899 (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha: Ballophilidae) From Central Amazonia, Brazil. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 52 (25): 291-309, DOI: 10.1590/S0031-10492012002500001, URL: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0031-10492012002500001&lng=en&tlng=en
03E94926FFDDFFA50A61F90F3ED6FEE8.text	03E94926FFDDFFA50A61F90F3ED6FEE8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ityphilus donatellae Pereira 2012	<div><p>Ityphilus donatellae sp. nov.</p> <p>(Figs. 1-14)</p> <p>Ityphilus calinus: Pereira, Foddai &amp; Minelli, 2000:1, 6-8 (non Ityphilus calinus Chamberlin, 1957).</p> <p>Diagnosis: An Ityphilus species with internal edge of forcipular tarsungulum partially serrate, very small body size (8.5 to 11 mm), and low number of leg-bearing segments (41 or 43). Among the other Neotropical members of the genus, it only shares the last trait with Ityphilus calinus Chamberlin, 1957. Ityphilus donatellae sp. nov. can be principally differentiated from I. calinus on the basis of the following selected traits (those for the latter are given in parentheses): antennae curved at middle, truly geniculate, Figs. 1, 9, 10, 12 (“curved at middle but not truly geniculate”, Fig. 26); antennae distally strongly clavate, Figs. 1, 9, 10, 12 (antennae distally slightly thickened, Fig. 26); a.a. XIV wider than long, in the proportion ca. 0.93: 1, Figs. 1, 9, 10, 12 (a.a. XIV longer than wide in the proportion ca. 1.49: 1, Fig. 26). Other traits differentiating both species, as in Table 1.</p> <p>Remarks: The differential characters listed in the previous lines and Table 1 (especially those related to the antennae) are stable enough in ballophilids, thus giving confidence in considering the specimens assigned to Ityphilus calinus in Pereira et al. (2000), as belonging to a species different to it, and new for the genus.</p> <p>Among the Neotropical species of Ityphilus, I. crabilli Pereira, Minelli &amp; Barbieri, 1994 and I. guianensis Chamberlin, 1921 (both with forcipular tarsungulum serrate) share with I. donatellae a roughly similar range of leg-bearing segments. I. calinus Chamberin, 1957 and I. savannus Chamberlin, 1943 (of which it is unknown whether the forcipular tarsungulum is serrate or smooth) also share a similar range. Ityphilus donatellae can be separated from I. calinus as shown in Table 1. It can be confidently differentiated from the other three taxa, by means of the following selected traits (the corresponding features for the new species are given in parentheses):</p> <p>— I. crabilli: male with 47, female with 47, 49, 51, 53 leg-bearing segments; body length 15 mm for males, 21 mm for females; antennae apically moderately clavate; specialized sensilla on apex of a.a. XIV with two very small apical branches; coxosternite of first maxillae with lappets; chitin-lines of forcipular coxosternite incomplete. (Male with 41, female with 43 leg-bearing segments; body length 8.5 mm in the male, 11 mm in females; antennae apically strongly clavate, Figs. 1, 9, 10, 12; specialized sensilla on apex of a.a. XIV not split apically; coxosternite of first maxillae without lappets, Fig. 3; chitin-lines of forcipular coxosternite complete, Fig. 4: a).</p> <p>— I. guianensis: clypeus with ca. six setae; sternite of leg-bearing segment 1 with pore-field; 49, 55 leg-bearing segments; body length 23 mm; chitin-lines of forcipular coxosternite incomplete. (Clypeus with ca. 12 setae; sternite of leg-bearing segment 1 without pore-field; (other features, already mentioned above)).</p> <p>— I. savannus: pore-fields present from sternite of leg-bearing segment 2 to fourth sternite from rear end of the body; 55 leg-bearing segments; body length 16 mm. (Ventral pore-fields present from second to penultimate leg-bearing segment; (other features, already mentioned above)).</p> <p>Ityphilus donatellae sp. nov. can be separated from the other Neotropical species of Ityphilus characterized by having the forcipular tarsungulum serrate, by using the key below.</p> <p>Type material (hereby designated): BRAZIL: <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-60.1&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-2.5666666" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -60.1/lat -2.5666666)">Amazonas</a>: secondary upland forest (02°34’S, 60°06’W), M.O. de A. Ribeiro leg., 7 November 1990: holotype female, 43 leg-bearing segments, body length 11 mm (INPA); same locality and collector, 6 December 1990: paratype male, 41 leg-bearing segments, body length 8.5 mm (INPA); same locality and collector, 9 October 1990: paratype female, 43 leg-bearing segments, body length 11 mm (MLP).</p> <p>Remarks: For details of morphological characters of I. donatellae sp. nov., see the “Redescription” of “ Ityphilus calinus Chamberlin, 1957 ” given in Pereira et al. (2000:6-8, figs. 42-68), in which the present holotype female (cited as Specimen “A”) and paratype male (cited as Specimen “B”) are described and illustrated in detail. Nevertheless, the following complementary morphological data can be added here based on the original figures of those specimens. Supplementary precisions on external morphology (together with new illustrations) are incorporated from the paratype female (examined here).</p> <p>Additional morphological information:</p> <p>Holotype female: Antennae nearly contiguous at base (Fig. 2), curved at middle and truly geniculate, apically distinctly thickened, strongly clavate (Fig. 1). Ratio of width of a.a. XI (= widest antennomere of distal antennal half)/width of a.a. VI (= narrowest antennomere of basal antennal half), ca. 1.58: 1; ratio of length of a.a. XIV/length of a.a. XI to XIII taken together, ca. 1.25: 1; ratio length of a.a. XIV/length of a.a. XIII, ca. 4.0: 1. Length/width ratio of left a.a. I to XIV as follows: I (0.50: 1); II (0.60: 1); III (0.60: 1); IV (0.60: 1); V (0.66: 1); VI (0.48: 1); VII (0.44: 1); VIII (0.36: 1); IX (0.33: 1); X (0.27: 1); XI (0.25: 1); XII (0.22: 1); XIII (0.24: 1); XIV (0.93: 1).</p> <p>Forcipular segment (Fig. 4): forcipular coxosternite with maximum width/length at the middle ratio, ca. 1.70: 1; forcipular telopodite with ratio of maximum length/maximum width of trochanteroprefemur, ca. 1.06: 1.</p> <p>Ultimate leg-bearing segment (Figs. 5, 6): wider than the penultimate leg-bearing segment in the proportion, ca. 1.16: 1; length/width ratio of tergite 0.68: 1; length/width ratio of sternite, 0.85: 1. Ultimate legs: ratio length of telopodites/length of sternite ca. 2.02: 1; ratio width of trochanter/width of tarsus 2, ca. 3.4: 1.</p> <p>Paratype male: Ultimate leg-bearing segment (Figs. 7, 8): wider than the penultimate leg-bearing segment in the proportion, ca. 1.35: 1; length/width ratio of tergite 0.88: 1; length/width ratio of sternite, 0.81: 1. Ultimate legs: ratio length of telopodites/ length of sternite, ca. 2.43: 1; ratio width of trochanter/width of tarsus 2, ca. 3.0: 1.</p> <p>Paratype female: Antennae: dorsal chaetotaxy of a.a. I-VIII represented by setae of different lengths, few in number and similar to those on the ventral side, setae on a.a. IX-XIV larger and much less numerous than those on ventral side (Fig. 9). Contour of appendages as in Figs. 10, 12.</p> <p>Cephalic plate: surface with reticulation as in Fig. 13; ratio of maximum width of cephalic plate/ maximum width of forcipular tergite, ca. 1.05: 1.</p> <p>Forcipular segment: forcipular tergite a little wider than the tergite of the first leg-bearing segment (in the proportion ca. 1.04: 1). Tarsungula when closed wholly behind the anterior margin of the head (Fig. 14).</p> <p>Tergites of leg-bearing segments: sulci not evident (apparently absent). Spermathecae (full of spermatozoa) located at level of the leg-bearing segments 38, 39, shape of posterior spermatheca as in Fig. 11: a.</p> <p>Etymology: This species is dedicated to Dr. Donatella Foddai (Padova, Italy), who was a kind partner in previous studies on geophilomorph centipedes.</p> <p>Type locality: BRAZIL: <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-60.1&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-2.5666666" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -60.1/lat -2.5666666)">Amazonas</a>: secondary upland forest (02°34’S, 60°06’W).</p> <p>Known range: BRAZIL: <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-59.983334&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-2.9166667" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -59.983334/lat -2.9166667)">Amazonas</a>: secondary upland forest (02°34’S, 60°06’W); Adolpho Ducke Forest Reserve (02°55’S, 59°59’W).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E94926FFDDFFA50A61F90F3ED6FEE8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Pereira, Luis Alberto	Pereira, Luis Alberto (2012): A New Dwarf Species, New Distribution Records, And Supplementary Descriptive Notes Of The Centipede Genus Ityphilus Cook, 1899 (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha: Ballophilidae) From Central Amazonia, Brazil. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 52 (25): 291-309, DOI: 10.1590/S0031-10492012002500001, URL: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0031-10492012002500001&lng=en&tlng=en
03E94926FFDBFFA5091DFE0F3C6DFA68.text	03E94926FFDBFFA5091DFE0F3C6DFA68.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ityphilus crabilli Pereira, Minelli & Barbieri 1994	<div><p>Ityphilus crabilli Pereira, Minelli &amp; Barbieri, 1994</p> <p>(Figs. 15-17)</p> <p>Ityphilus crabilli Pereira, Minelli &amp; Barbieri, 1994:163, 164-166; Pereira et al., 1995:326, 327; Adis et al., 1996:168, 169; Pereira &amp; Minelli, 1996:110; Foddai et al., 2000:153; 2002:473; 2004:276; Bonato et al., 2007:3; Pereira, 2010:659-660.</p> <p>Type material examined: Holotype female, with 53 leg-bearing segments, body length 21 mm, from BRAZIL: Amazonas: Rio Tarumã Mirím, Igapó (BE), 4 August 1976, J. Adis legit. (INPA).</p> <p>New material examined: BRAZIL: Amazonas: Manaus: INPA (secondary upland forest, unburned), Kempson soil extraction, 25 September 1985, J. Adis et al. leg.: 1 female (with the two spermathecae full of spermatozoa), 49 leg-bearing segments, body length 23 mm; 1 male with 47 leg-bearing segments, body length 15 mm (MLP). BRAZIL: Amazonas: secondary upland forest (02°34’S, 60°06’W), 3 January 1991, M.O. de A. Ribeiro leg.: 1 male (with tubula seminifera full of mature spermatozoa), 47 leg-bearing segments, body length 16 mm (MLP). Same locality and collector, 6 October 1990: 1 female (with the two spermathecae full of spermatozoa, and with mature ova), 49 leg-bearing segments, body length 22 mm; 6 December 1990: 1 male (with tubula seminifera full of mature spermatozoa), 47 leg-bearing segments, body length 15 mm; 7 November 1990: 1 female (with the two spermathecae full of spermatozoa), 49 leg-bearing segments, body length 16 mm; 1 juvenile (female?) with 1+1 coxal organs only, 49 leg-bearing segments, body length 7 mm (MLP). BRAZIL: Amazonas: Lago Janauarí, secondary upland forest (03°20’S, 60°17’W), pitfall traps, 29 December 1995, J. Adis et al. leg.: 1 female (with the two spermathecae full of spermatozoa), 49 leg-bearing segments, body length 15 mm (MLP).</p> <p>Remarks: The localities of Manaus: INPA; secondary upland forest (02°34’S, 60°06’W); and Lago Janauarí</p> <p>(all in Brazil: Amazonas State), are new for the geographic distribution of I. crabilli.</p> <p>Additional morphological information:</p> <p>Female holotype: The following rectifying data can be given on the antennae: ventral and dorsal surface of a.a. II, V, IX and XIII (Figs. 15, 16) with very small specialized sensilla. On the ventral side, these sensilla are represented by two different types: a and b. Type a sensilla are very thin and not split apically (Fig. 15: a); type b sensilla, thicker than type a, hyaline, and having two very small apical branches (Fig. 15: b). Specialized sensilla on dorsal side represented by three different types: a and b, similar to a and b of ventral side (Fig. 16: a, b); and type c sensilla “spine-like” or “claviform” larger and much darker (ochreous) in col- or (Fig. 16: c). Number and distribution of specialized sensilla on a.a. II, V, IX and XIII, as in Table 2.</p> <p>Remarks: The original description by Pereira et al. (1994), only mentions two types of specialized sensilla (hereby individualized as “ type b ” and “ type c ”). The original source of this nomenclature is Pereira et al. (1995).</p> <p>Post-embryonic variation of coxal organs: the juvenile cited above, has 1+1 coxal organs in the coxopleura of the ultimate leg-bearing segment (Fig. 17); in contrast, mature specimens have 2+2 coxal organs.</p> <p>Variation: all males recorded up to now have 47 leg-bearing segments, females with 47, 49, 51 or 53 leg-bearing segments.</p> <p>Type locality: Brazil: Amazonas: Rio Tarumã Mirím.</p> <p>Known range: BRAZIL: <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-60.1&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-2.5666666" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -60.1/lat -2.5666666)">Amazonas</a>: <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-60.1&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-2.5666666" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -60.1/lat -2.5666666)">Tarumã Mirím River</a>; <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-60.1&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-2.5666666" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -60.1/lat -2.5666666)">Adolpho Ducke Forest Reserve</a>; Manaus: INPA; secondary upland forest (02°34’S, 60°06’W); Janauarí Lake.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E94926FFDBFFA5091DFE0F3C6DFA68	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Pereira, Luis Alberto	Pereira, Luis Alberto (2012): A New Dwarf Species, New Distribution Records, And Supplementary Descriptive Notes Of The Centipede Genus Ityphilus Cook, 1899 (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha: Ballophilidae) From Central Amazonia, Brazil. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 52 (25): 291-309, DOI: 10.1590/S0031-10492012002500001, URL: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0031-10492012002500001&lng=en&tlng=en
03E94926FFD5FFAB091CFF0F3CEDF988.text	03E94926FFD5FFAB091CFF0F3CEDF988.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ityphilus demoraisi Pereira, Minelli & Barbieri 1995	<div><p>Ityphilus demoraisi Pereira, Minelli &amp; Barbieri, 1995</p> <p>(Figs. 18-25)</p> <p>Ityphilus demoraisi Pereira, Minelli &amp; Barbieri, 1995:325, 327, 328; Pereira &amp; Minelli, 1996:110; Adis et al., 1996:166, 168; Pereira et al., 2000:8; Foddai et al., 2000:153; 2002:473; 2004:276; Bonato et al., 2007:3; Pereira, 2010:660.</p> <p>New material examined: BRAZIL: <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-60.1&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-2.5666666" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -60.1/lat -2.5666666)">Amazonas</a>: secondary upland forest (02°34’S, 60°06’W), 3 January 1991, M.O. de A. Ribeiro leg.: 1 male (Specimen “A”) with 63 leg-bearing segments, body length 30 mm (MLP); same locality and collector, 28 August 1990: 1 male (Specimen “B”) with 65 leg-bearing segments, body length 29 mm (MLP).</p> <p>Remarks: The locality cited above, is new for the geographic distribution of this species.</p> <p>The adult condition of the two specimens listed here is proved by the tubula seminifera full of mature spermatozoa.</p> <p>The original description by Pereira et al. (1995) was based on females only (holotype, paratype, and a juvenile). Subsequently, no specimens have been reported for this species, thus the male remained unknown until now; the present new material allows the first description of this sex, giving a better understanding of the taxon.</p> <p>Description</p> <p>Male (Specimen A): Sixty-three leg-bearing segments, body length 30 mm, maximum body width 0.8 mm.</p> <p>Features similar to those in the female, except for the shape and chaetotaxy of the ultimate leg-bearing segment and postpedal segments.</p> <p>Ultimate leg-bearing segment: conspicuously wider than the penultimate leg-bearing segment, in the proportion ca. 1.63: 1; length/width ratio of tergite, 0.63: 1; length/width ratio of sternite: 0.75: 1. Shape and chaetotaxy of tergite and sternite as in Figs. 18, 19. Coxopleura with numerous setae on ventral and lateral surfaces, dorsal side with few setae placed near the lateral edges only (Figs. 18, 19). Coxal organs with shape and relative size as in Figs. 19, 20. Articles of ultimate legs strongly thickened, subconically narrowing from base to distal end (ratio of width of trochanter/width of tarsus 2, ca. 3.0: 1); ultimate legs relatively longer than those of the female, with ratio length of telopodites/length of sternite, 2.57: 1. Shape and chaetotaxy of ultimate legs as in Figs. 18, 19.</p> <p>Postpedal segments: intermediate tergite with posterior margin strongly convex (Fig. 18), intermediate sternite and first genital sternite with posterior margin slightly concave (Figs. 19, 21). Gonopods apparently uniarticulate (suture between the presumptive basal and apical articles not evident), right gonopod with 12 setae on ventral side (Fig. 22). Penis apparently devoid of apical setae, shape as in Fig. 23.</p> <p>Variation: the females recorded up to now have 67 or 69 leg-bearing segments; the males 63 or 65 leg-bearing segments.</p> <p>The anterior and posterior coxal organs of the female holotype (Figs. 24, 25), and those of female paratype, are roughly similar in size; in contrast, in both males examined here the anterior coxal organs are smaller than the posterior (in the proportion shown in Figs. 19, 20). Because there is no doubt about the conspecificity of the present males with the holotype and paratype female, this difference could be interpreted as an intraspecific variation (or artifacts in the temporary microscope slides). More specimens are needed to clarify this issue.</p> <p>Ecology: The two specimens herein reported were collected in a secondary forest, while the type material comes from a primary rainforest at the Adolpho Ducke Forest Reserve, a 100 Km2 high biodiversity area belonging to INPA, located near the city of Manaus. (A description of its geology, soil characteristics and floristic composition is given by Gentry, 1990; Hopkins, 2005, 2007; Penny &amp; Arias, 1982; and Ribeiro et al., 1999).</p> <p>Type locality: Brazil: Amazonas: Reserva Florestal A. Ducke (02°55’S, 59°59’W).</p> <p>Known range: BRAZIL: <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-60.1&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-2.5666666" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -60.1/lat -2.5666666)">Amazonas</a>: Adolpho Ducke Forest Reserve (02°55’S, 59°59’W); secondary upland forest (02°34’S, 60°06’W).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E94926FFD5FFAB091CFF0F3CEDF988	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Pereira, Luis Alberto	Pereira, Luis Alberto (2012): A New Dwarf Species, New Distribution Records, And Supplementary Descriptive Notes Of The Centipede Genus Ityphilus Cook, 1899 (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha: Ballophilidae) From Central Amazonia, Brazil. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 52 (25): 291-309, DOI: 10.1590/S0031-10492012002500001, URL: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0031-10492012002500001&lng=en&tlng=en
03E94926FFD5FFAF0BB8F9EF3BF4FCC8.text	03E94926FFD5FFAF0BB8F9EF3BF4FCC8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ityphilus calinus Chamberlin 1957	<div><p>Ityphilus calinus Chamberlin, 1957</p> <p>(Fig. 26)</p> <p>Ityphilus calinus Chamberlin, 1957:25, 30; Pereira &amp; Minelli, 1996:110; Foddai et al., 2000:153; Adis et al., 2002:18; Foddai et al., 2002:473; 2004:276; Bonato et al., 2007:3; Pereira, 2010:663.</p> <p>Diagnosis: An Ityphilus species characterized by having a low number of leg-bearing segments (43). Among the other Neotropical members of the genus, it only shares the same trait with I. donatellae sp. nov.; I. calinus can be principally differentiated from the latter by means of the following selected traits (those for I. donatellae are given in parentheses): “Antennae curved at middle but not truly geniculate”, Fig. 26 (curved at middle, truly geniculate, Figs. 1, 9, 10, 12); antennae distally slightly thickened, Fig. 26 (antennae distally strongly clavate, Figs. 1, 9, 10, 12); a.a. XIV longer than wide, in the proportion ca. 1.49: 1 (a.a. XIV wider than long, in the proportion ca. 0.93: 1). Other features differentiating both species, as in Table 1.</p> <p>Remarks: This species was insufficiently described by Chamberlin (1957) on the basis of a single specimen (male holotype). The original description does not state whether the forcipular tarsungulum is serrate or smooth, lacks information on many other important characters of specific value, and only includes a single figure (illustrating the anterior end of the body), which is herein reproduced as Fig. 26. However, a few approximate ratios related to antennal articles and cephalic plate (included here in Table 1 as indicative traits for this species), are tentatively deduced from this original figure.</p> <p>Pereira et al. (2000) stated that the original description of I. calinus is entirely devoid of figures. However that statement was an inadvertent mistake, since “fig. 7” of Chamberlin (on page 23 of his paper) does correspond to this taxon.</p> <p>The type locality given by this author may be more appropriately cited as follows: Colombia: Valle del Cauca Department: 13 mi. W. of Santiago de Cali. (This town is located in the geographic valley of the Cauca River, on the west bank of the water course, about 1000 m a.s.l., between the Central Cordillera and the Occidental Cordillera of the Andes (very close to the latter)). Chamberlin does not give the altitude a.s.l. of the collecting site (thirteen miles West of the mentioned city as stated above, (Fig. 35)).</p> <p>The inclusion of Brazil in the geographic distribution of I. calinus by Adis et al. (2002); Foddai et al. (2000, 2002, 2004); Pereira et al. (2000); and Bonato et al. (2007) is not valid, because it was based on the specimens herein identified as I. donatellae sp. nov.</p> <p>Type locality: “ Colombia: 13 mi. W. of Cali, Valle ”.</p> <p>Known range: Only known from the type locality.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E94926FFD5FFAF0BB8F9EF3BF4FCC8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Pereira, Luis Alberto	Pereira, Luis Alberto (2012): A New Dwarf Species, New Distribution Records, And Supplementary Descriptive Notes Of The Centipede Genus Ityphilus Cook, 1899 (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha: Ballophilidae) From Central Amazonia, Brazil. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 52 (25): 291-309, DOI: 10.1590/S0031-10492012002500001, URL: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0031-10492012002500001&lng=en&tlng=en
03E94926FFD1FFAC09A9FC203BA3FD88.text	03E94926FFD1FFAC09A9FC203BA3FD88.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ityphilus COOK 1899	<div><p>Key to the Neotropical species of Ityphilus with forcipular tarsungulum serrate</p> <p>1. Internal edge of forcipular tarsungulum entirely serrate (Fig. 29: a); internal side of a.a. I with strong stout setae (Fig. 28: a); coxosternite of second maxillae with a sulcus along the sagittal plane........................................................................................................................... I. sensibilis Pereira, Foddai &amp; Minelli, 2000</p> <p>– Internal edge of forcipular tarsungulum partially serrate; internal side of a.a. I without strong stout setae; coxosternite of second maxillae without a sulcus along the sagittal plane.................................................2</p> <p>2. 113 leg-bearing segments (female), body length 93 mm........................................... I. grandis (Turk, 1955)</p> <p>– 41 to 95 leg-bearing segments, body length 8.5 to 83 mm.........................................................................3</p> <p>3. 95 leg-bearing segments (female); body length 83 mm; sternites of posterior third of the body without pore-fields; sternite of the ultimate leg-bearing segment with 1+1 ovoid prominences on the posterior half (Fig. 31: a)...................................................................................... I. mauriesi Demange &amp; Pereira, 1985</p> <p>– 41 to 71 leg-bearing segments; body length 8.5 to 57 mm; sternites of posterior third of the body with pore-fields.......................................................................................................................................................4</p> <p>4. Ventral pore-fields of anterior half of the body undivided (Fig. 32), those of the posterior half divided in two subsymetrical areas (Figs. 33, 34)........................................................... I. krausi Pereira &amp; Minelli, 1996</p> <p>– All pore-fields undivided............................................................................................................................5</p> <p>5. 41 or 43 leg-bearing segments, body length 8.5 to 11 mm............................................ I. donatellae sp. nov.</p> <p>– 47 to 71 leg-bearing segments, body length 15 to 57 mm..........................................................................6</p> <p>6. Sternite of leg-bearing segment 1 with pore-field.......................................................................................7</p> <p>– Sternite of leg-bearing segment 1 without pore-field..................................................................................8</p> <p>7. Male with 63, 65 leg-bearing segments, female with 67, 69 leg-bearing segments; body length 30-32 mm; antennae distally moderately clavate; chitin-lines of forcipular coxosternite complete........................................................................................................................... I. demoraisi Pereira, Minelli &amp; Barbieri, 1995</p> <p>– 49, 55 leg-bearing segments; body length 23 mm; antennae distally strongly clavate; chitin-lines of forcipular coxosternite incomplete....................................................................... I. guianensis Chamberlin, 1921</p> <p>8. Sternite of leg-bearing segment 2 without a well defined pore-field (only an isolated pore can be present); anterior edge of forcipular coxosternite deeply notched at middle; chitin-lines of forcipular coxosternite complete; ratio of maximum length/maximum width of forcipular trochanteroprefemur ca. 1.32: 1......................................................................................................... I. saucius Pereira, Foddai &amp; Minelli, 2000</p> <p>– Sternite of leg-bearing segment 2 with a well defined pore-field; anterior edge of forcipular coxosternite not deeply notched at middle; chitin-lines of forcipular coxosternite incomplete; ratio of maximum length/ maximum width of forcipular trochanteroprefemur ca. 1.10-1.17: 1.......................................................9</p> <p>9. Male with 47, female with 47, 49, 51, 53 leg-bearing segments.......................................................................................................................................................... I. crabilli Pereira, Minelli &amp; Barbieri, 1994</p> <p>– With 61 to 71 leg-bearing segments........................................................................................................10</p> <p>10. 61 (male), 63 (male, female?) leg-bearing segments; body length 17-18 mm; first maxillae without lappets; ventral pore-fields extending to antepenultimate leg-bearing segment.......... I. perrieri (Brölemann, 1909)</p> <p>– 67 (male), 71 (female) leg-bearing segments; body length: 40 mm (male), 57 mm (female); first maxillary lappets present on coxosternite and telopodites; ventral pore-fields extending to penultimate leg-bearing segment (Fig. 30: a)............................................................................................... I. betschi Pereira, 2010</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E94926FFD1FFAC09A9FC203BA3FD88	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Pereira, Luis Alberto	Pereira, Luis Alberto (2012): A New Dwarf Species, New Distribution Records, And Supplementary Descriptive Notes Of The Centipede Genus Ityphilus Cook, 1899 (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha: Ballophilidae) From Central Amazonia, Brazil. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 52 (25): 291-309, DOI: 10.1590/S0031-10492012002500001, URL: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0031-10492012002500001&lng=en&tlng=en
