identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03E96419FFF1D809FDF94C6BFA91BEC5.text	03E96419FFF1D809FDF94C6BFA91BEC5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Parasogata Zhou, Yang & Chen 2018	<div><p>Genus Parasogata Zhou, Yang &amp; Chen, 2018</p><p>Parasogata Zhou, Yang &amp; Chen, 2018: 74 .</p><p>Type species Parasogata binaria Zhou, Yang &amp; Chen, 2018 (by original designation).</p><p>Amended diagnosis</p><p>Yellowish white to brown (Fig. 1A). Vertex, pronotum and mesonotum with uninterrupted white fascia. Vertex, frons, face, antennae yellowish brown to yellowish white. Pronotum and mesonotum yellowish white (Fig. 1 C–D). Forewings and hindwings hyaline with prominent veins (Fig. 1B). Legs yellowish white. Abdomen yellowish orange (Fig. 1B). Head including eyes narrower than pronotum (Fig. 1C). Vertex subquadrangular, weakly anteriorly projected; anterior margin arched, submedian carinae uniting at apex; Y-shaped carina feeble (Fig. 1C). Frons with lateral margins weakly diverging ventrad (widest near frontoclypeal suture); much longer in middle line than wide at widest part; median carina forked at fastigium (Fig. 1D). Antennae cylindrical, scape longer than wide, pedicle more than twice length of scape (Zhou et al. 2018: figs 13–16). Pronotum relatively broad, lateral carinae nearly attaining hind margin (Fig. 1C). Spinal formula of hind leg 5-7-4. Post-tibial spur with 29–32 fine teeth along hind margin. Pygofer in profile wider ventrally than dorsally, lateral quadrangular areas strongly sclerotized, medioventral process absent. Diaphragm well developed, dorsal margin broadly convex, armature very weak (Fig. 2 D–F). Aedeagus long, tubular, weakly upturned, with row of dorsal subapical processes (Fig. 2 B–C; Zhou et al. 2018: figs 26, 52). Parameres (= gonostyli) simple (basal and apical angles not developed), widely divergent apically (Fig. 2H; Zhou et al. 2018: figs 27–28, 53–54). Suspensorium elongate (Zhou et al. 2018: figs 29, 55). Segment 10 collar-shaped, lateroapical angles produced into 1–2 paired processes (widely separated at base in caudal view) (Fig. 2G; Zhou et al. 2018: figs 24–25, 51).</p><p>Remarks</p><p>This genus is readily recognized by its large size and vertex, pronotum and mesonotum bearing an uninterrupted white fascia. The genus was compared with four similar genera by Zhou et al. (2018) and considered most similar to Sogata Distant, 1906 but distinguished by the phallus being up-curved, bearing a dorsal row of subapical processes.</p><p>Key to the species of Parasogata Zhou, Yang &amp; Chen, 2018 based on males (modified from Zhou</p><p>et al. 2018)</p><p>1. Pronotum yellow (except median vitta); segment 10 bearing one pair of processes (Zhou et al. 2018: figs 50–51) ................................................................................................. P. furca Zhou et al., 2018</p><p>– Pronotum brown (except median vitta); segment 10 bearing two pairs of processes ...................... 2</p><p>2. Aedeagus with 10 subapical dorsal processes; segment 10 with two pairs of processes, ventral one about 2× as long as dorsal one (Zhou et al. 2018, figs 24–25) .............. P. binaria Zhou et al., 2018</p><p>– Aedeagus with 6 subapical dorsal processes; segment 10 with two pair of processes, ventral one about 4× as long as dorsal one (Fig. 2 A–C, G) ................................................. P. sexpartita sp. nov.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E96419FFF1D809FDF94C6BFA91BEC5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	N., Ramya;Bartlett, Charles;Meshram, Naresh M.	N., Ramya, Bartlett, Charles, Meshram, Naresh M. (2020): Two new species of planthoppers from India (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Delphacidae) in the genera Parasogata and Eoeurysa. European Journal of Taxonomy 724: 93-108, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.724.1161
03E96419FFF0D80DFD924F18FC10BAAB.text	03E96419FFF0D80DFD924F18FC10BAAB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Parasogata sexpartita Bartlett & Meshram 2020	<div><p>Parasogata sexpartita sp. nov.</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 6E735B03-F229-4D61-B1E6-BEF3AAC0F369</p><p>Figs 1–2</p><p>Diagnosis</p><p>Parasogata sexpartita sp. nov. can be recognized by yellowish orange to stramineous habitus (Fig. 1A) with uninterrupted white vitta from frons to tip of scutellum (Fig. 1C) and aedeagus with 6 subapical dorsal processes (Fig. 2 A–C), segment 10 with two pairs of processes (Fig. 2G).</p><p>Etymology</p><p>The species name is derived from the Latin term ‘ sex ’, meaning ‘six’, plus ‘ partita ’, meaning ‘parted’, a reference to the number of subapical spines on the aedeagus. The specific epithet is intended to be feminine in gender to match apparent gender.</p><p>Type material</p><p>Holotype</p><p>INDIA • ♂; Nagaland, Jharnapani; 25°75′58″ N, 93°84′39″ E; 23 Jun. 2019; Niranjan G.N. leg.; Hg light trap; NPC HEMT7.</p><p>Paratype</p><p>INDIA • 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; NPC HEMT8 .</p><p>Description</p><p>MEASUREMENTS (mm). Male (holotype, NPC HEMT7) 4.6 long, 0.7 wide across eyes, 0.5 wide across hind margin of pronotum.</p><p>COLOURATION. Yellowish orange to stramineous. Vertex, pronotum and mesonotum with uninterrupted white vitta. Near-black bands follow lateral carinae from anterolateral compartments of vertex to frontoclypeal suture; median portion of frons white (continuation of dorsal vitta); clypeus pale medially, darker laterally. Genae orangish anteriorly, stramineous around (and including) antennae. Pronotum and mesonotum dark yellow. Forewings and hindwings yellow-hyaline with prominent black veins. Legs yellowish white. Abdomen yellowish orange (Fig. 1 A–D).</p><p>MORPHOLOGY. Head including eyes 0.9× as wide as pronotum. Head weakly produced, vertex 0.3× as long as head width (including eyes) (Fig. 1A, C). Fastigium elliptical in lateral view (Fig. 1B). Frons longer than wide, lateral margins smoothly diverging to frontoclypeal suture, widest at apex; median carina forked at level of compound eyes. Clypeus as wide as frons basally, rostrum reaching mesocoxae. Antennae terete (Fig. 1D). Pronotum 3.2 × as wide as long, anterior margin truncate behind vertex, posterior margin broadly convex; lateral carinae diverging, not reaching hind margin. Mesonotum 1.1× as wide as long; carina not conspicuous, obsolete before hind margin, lateral carinae weakly diverging (Fig. 1C). Forewings with R fork proximate to CuA fork; cell formed between fork of R and nodal line longer than that of cubitus; clavus long, reaching wing margin past basal ¾ of wing (approximately at nodal line); fork of Pcu+1A in basal ¼ of wing; branching pattern: RA unbranched, RP 2-branched (RP</p><p>1+2</p><p>, RP</p><p>3+4</p><p>), MP unbranched, CuA 2-branched.</p><p>MALE GENITALIA (Fig. 2). Pygofer in lateral view approximately quadrangular (Fig. 2F), anterior margin nearly truncate, caudal margin convexly rounded (in lateral view), 1.2× as long as wide; margins of opening rounded (not carinate). Diaphragm well developed, dorsal margin concave, armature weak (Fig. 2D). Parameres diverging, rather sinuate, 6.1× as long as wide; widest subapically, apically acute (Fig. 2H). Aedeagus 8× as long as wide; shallow tubular, dorso-basally concave, subapically ornamented with six radiating spines dorsally; apically recurved with dorsal gonopore (Fig. 2 A–C). Segment 10, including segment 11, 0.7× as long as wide (in lateral view) with two pairs of latero-apical pointed processes (dorsal tooth-like, ventral more elongate and directed ventrad); segment 11 long (Fig. 2G).</p><p>Molecular data</p><p>The DNA barcode fragment (mtCOI ~ 650bp) sequence was submitted to NCBI GenBank with accession number MN787519.</p><p>Remarks</p><p>This species is similar to P. binaria and can be distinguished by an aedeagus with six radiating spines (Fig. 2 B–C) (vs ten in binaria) subapically and dorsal gonopore.</p><p>A peculiar aspect of the forewing venation is that the MP vein bends sharply at the nodal line, and it is not entirely clear whether it is angled toward the leading or trailing portion of the wing, a matter that could change the interpretation of the vein branches. Both previously described species of Parasogata appear to have the RP 3-branched (RP 1+2, RP 3, RP 4).</p><p>There are no host associations reported for any species of Parasogata .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E96419FFF0D80DFD924F18FC10BAAB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	N., Ramya;Bartlett, Charles;Meshram, Naresh M.	N., Ramya, Bartlett, Charles, Meshram, Naresh M. (2020): Two new species of planthoppers from India (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Delphacidae) in the genera Parasogata and Eoeurysa. European Journal of Taxonomy 724: 93-108, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.724.1161
03E96419FFF5D80CFD854DBEFA91BBC0.text	03E96419FFF5D80CFD854DBEFA91BBC0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eoeurysa Muir 1913	<div><p>Genus Eoeurysa Muir, 1913</p><p>Eoeurysa Muir, 1913: 249 .</p><p>Type species Eoeurysa flavocapitata Muir, 1913 (by monotypy).</p><p>Amended diagnosis</p><p>Habitus colouration varies from near black (in male E. flavocapitata) to near white. Body distinctly dorsoventrally flattened (Fig. 3 A–C). Head including eyes narrower than pronotum, projecting slightly in front of eyes. Vertex broad, narrowed anteriorly, as long as wide at base, Y-shaped carina distinct, apically converging at fastigium (Fig. 3D); fastigium rather angled (Fig. 3C) (appearing carinae when viewed from ventral aspect). Frons broad, lateral margins arched, slightly longer in middle line than wide at widest part, widest somewhat above frontoclypeal suture, median carina prominent and forked at fastigium. Basally clypeus as wide as apex of frons on dorsal margin. Rostrum reaching to mesocoxae (Fig. 3E). Ocelli present. Antennae terete, scape about as long as wide, pedicel exceeding 2× scape; surpassing frontoclypeal suture (Fig. 3 D–E). Pronotum broad, lateral carinae attaining hind margin (Fig. 3D). Spinal formula of hind leg 5-7-4. Post-tibial spur with 17–19 fine teeth. Pygofer with laterodorsal angles not produced, in posterior view with opening rather quadrangular, appearing wider than long, medioventral process absent; diaphragm relatively weak, moderately wide, dorsal margin convex, protruding into a plate (Fig. 4B, D, G). Phallus tubular, approximately straight (Fig. 4C). Suspensorium elongate quadrangular, circular at ventral half. Segment 10 (anal segment) ring-like with short latero-apical processes (Fig. 4A).</p><p>Remarks</p><p>The genus can be distinguished by the depressed shape of the body (reminiscent of Eumetopina Breddin, 1896), and the broad, apically converging vertex. Eoeurysa is similar to Eumetopina, although the latter genus has a broader frons and displays processes on the medioventral portion of the pygofer opening.</p><p>Biology</p><p>Host associations of the genus are giant cane ( Arundo donax L.) for Eoeurysa arundina Kuoh &amp; Ding, 1980 (Kuoh et al. 1980) and sugarcane ( Saccharum sinense Roxb. and S. officinarum L.) for Eoeurysa flavocapitata (Chatterjee 1971; Wilson 1987; Wilson et al. 1992; Ding 2006).</p><p>Key to the species of Eoeurysa Muir, 1913 (revised from Yang 1989)</p><p>1. General colouration mostly dark brown; vertex nearly as broad as long on midline (Yang 1989: fig. 110A); males with parameres nearly parallel-sided (not expanded medially, Yang 1989: fig. 110E); aedeagus lacking basal process (bearing flattened projection near midlength (Yang 1989: fig. 110J) ................................................................................................. E. flavocapitata Muir, 2013</p><p>– General colouration pale (except clypeus and adjacent parts); vertex longer in midline than broad; male with parameres expanded medially; aedeagus with elongate process off dorso-basal portion 2</p><p>2. Clypeus dark (Yang 1989: fig. 111B); parameres very broad medially; aedeagus with 7–8 dorsal teeth (Yang 1989: fig. 111E, H) ..................................................... E. arundina Kuoh &amp; Ding, 1980</p><p>– Clypeus pale yellowish (Fig. 3E); parameres modestly expanded medially, in lateral view with mediolateral process (Fig. 4 E–F); apex of aedeagus sagittate, lacking dorsal teeth (Fig. 4C) ........... ............................................................................................................................ E. sagittaria sp. nov.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E96419FFF5D80CFD854DBEFA91BBC0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	N., Ramya;Bartlett, Charles;Meshram, Naresh M.	N., Ramya, Bartlett, Charles, Meshram, Naresh M. (2020): Two new species of planthoppers from India (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Delphacidae) in the genera Parasogata and Eoeurysa. European Journal of Taxonomy 724: 93-108, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.724.1161
03E96419FFF4D801FD844D07FD74BF6B.text	03E96419FFF4D801FD844D07FD74BF6B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eoeurysa sagittaria Bartlett & Meshram 2020	<div><p>Eoeurysa sagittaria sp. nov.</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: EA1BE8CB-8138-4643-A8B9-DE75946E422D</p><p>Figs 3–5</p><p>Diagnosis</p><p>Body dorsoventrally flattened, colouration creamy white to pale yellow, without dark markings (Fig. 3A). Vertex longer than broad (Fig. 3D). Male with parameres simple, sinuate, weakly expanded medially (Fig. 4E), in lateral view with mediolateral process (Fig. 4F). Aedeagus tubular, approximately straight, with strong, elongate, dorso-basal process, apex sagittate (Fig. 4C). Segment 10 with single caudal process (Fig. 4D).</p><p>Etymology</p><p>The species name comes from the Latin word ‘ sagittaria ’, meaning ‘arrow’, in reference to the arrowhead shape of the apex of the aedeagus. The specific epithet is feminine in gender to match the apparent gender of the genus.</p><p>Type material</p><p>Holotype</p><p>INDIA • ♂; Himachal Pradesh, Rampur Una; 31°44′92″ N, 77°62′92″ E; 22 Sep. 2018; Sunil and G.N. Niranjan leg; light trap; NPC HEMT9.</p><p>Paratypes</p><p>INDIA • 4 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; NPC HEMT10 to HEMT13 • 7 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; NPC HEMT14 to HEMT20 .</p><p>Description</p><p>MEASUREMENTS (mm). Male (holotype, NPC HEMT9) 3.7 long, 0.6 wide across eyes, 0.5 wide across hind margin of pronotum. Female (paratype, NPC HEMT14) 3.9 long, 0.6 wide across eyes, 0.5 wide across hind margin of pronotum.</p><p>COLOURATION. Creamy white to pale yellow. Head concolorous with thorax; thorax creamy white with light yellow carina; tegulae concolorous with thoracic notum. Forewings hyaline, veins pale, apical margin bordered with black. Abdomen creamy white near base, near black distally (Fig. 3 A–E).</p><p>MORPHOLOGY. Body dorsoventrally depressed. Head including eyes 0.9× as wide as pronotum. Vertex broad, widest at base, tapering distally to broad apex; length 0.4× width across eyes, Y-shaped carina distinct, forked near distal margin of eyes (Fig. 3A, D). Anterior margin of head weakly convex (from dorsal or ventral view), fastigium sharply angled (from lateral view) (Fig. 3C). Frons moderately broad, longer than wide, lateral margins weakly arced, widest subapically; median carina forked near fastigium. Carina of frons and clypeus prominent. Clypeus base as wide as apex of frons, rostrum reaching mesocoxae (Fig. 3E). Antennae terete, scape about as wide as long; pedicel approximately 3 × as long as scape. Pronotum broad, 3.1× as wide as long; carinae distinct, lateral carinae reaching posterior margin. Mesonotum 1.1 × as wide as long (Fig. 3D), with carinae not reaching posterior margin, lateral carinae weakly diverging posteriorly.</p><p>MALE GENITALIA (Fig. 4). Pygofer in lateral view roughly triangular (much wider ventrally than dorsally, dorsocaudal margins not expanded); in caudal view 1.2 × as long as wide, medioventral processes of opening absent, diaphragm weakly sclerotized, moderately wide, dorsal margin convexly produced (Fig. 4D, G). Parameres simple (in caudal view), 8× as long as wide; sinuate with sharp, dorsolaterally directed apices (Fig. 4E); in lateral view with mediolateral process (Fig. 4F). Aedeagus tubular, straight, mostly of uniform width; 7.2 × as long as wide; base with elongate caudally curved spine; apex abruptly broadened and decurved round sagittate apex, basally ornamented with long curved spinose process. Suspensorium elongate, ventral two-thirds ring-like (Fig. 4A, C). Segment 10 quadrangular, 1× as long as wide, ring-like, bearing short, curved processes on dorsocaudal surface; segment 11 moderately long (Fig. 4A, D).</p><p>FEMALE GENITALIA (Fig. 5). Valvulae I in lateral view (Fig. 5A), dorsally concave, dorsal and ventral margin with smoothly sculptured area extending from base to apex. Valvulae II (Fig. 5B), in lateral view, distal half of dorsal margin with 17–18 large, quadrangular, distantly placed serrations decreasing in size gradually towards the apex; apex acute with small serrations; ventral margin translucent, tip with few serrations.</p><p>Molecular data</p><p>The DNA barcode fragment (mtCOI ~ 650bp) sequence was submitted to NCBI GenBank with accession numbers MN787520 and MN787521.</p><p>Remarks</p><p>Eoeurysa sagittaria sp. nov. is closely related to E. arundina, especially based on the basal process of aedeagus (Fig. 4C). This species can easily be identified by the flattened body (Fig. 3A), the progressively broadening frons (Fig. 3D) and the structure of the male genitalia (Fig. 4) (aedeagus apically sagittate, lacking the dorsal teeth of E. arundina).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E96419FFF4D801FD844D07FD74BF6B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	N., Ramya;Bartlett, Charles;Meshram, Naresh M.	N., Ramya, Bartlett, Charles, Meshram, Naresh M. (2020): Two new species of planthoppers from India (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Delphacidae) in the genera Parasogata and Eoeurysa. European Journal of Taxonomy 724: 93-108, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.724.1161
