taxonID	type	description	language	source
03F76D26FFDCF334ACF20173748F998A.taxon	description	Notes: ― Szlachetko & Rutkowski (2008: 166) indicated the specimen Schwarzmaier 32793 (BR), collected in August 1936, as the lectotype. However, this proposal is untenable because this specimen was not cited in the protologue and there is no evidence that Cogniaux examined this specimen. According to Article 9.19 of the International Code of Nomenclature (Turland et al. 2018): “ The author who first designates (Art. 7.10, 7.11, and F. 5.4) a lectotype or a neotype … must be followed, but … the choice may also be superseded if it can be shown that … (c) it is in serious conflict with the protologue, in which case an element that is not in conflict with the protologue is to be chosen ”. Thus, we designate here another specimen as lectotype.	en	Guimarães, Leonardo R. S., Salazar, Gerardo A., Barros, Fábio De (2019): Lectotypifications and taxonomic notes in the Stenorrhynchos clade (Spiranthinae, Orchidaceae). Phytotaxa 394 (1): 111, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.9, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.9
03F76D26FFDCF334ACC7044372579BEE.taxon	description	Note: ― Szlachetko & Rutkowski (2008: 161) designated as lectotype the specimen Tonduz 4645 supposedly at B but destroyed, a clearly untenable proposal. Thus, we choose an isotype as the lectotype.	en	Guimarães, Leonardo R. S., Salazar, Gerardo A., Barros, Fábio De (2019): Lectotypifications and taxonomic notes in the Stenorrhynchos clade (Spiranthinae, Orchidaceae). Phytotaxa 394 (1): 111, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.9, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.9
03F76D26FFDCF337ACC705D772D89CC0.taxon	description	= Stenorrhynchos macranthum (Rchb. f.) Cogn. f. robustior Cogniaux in Chodat & Hassler (1903: 931). Lectotype (designated here): ― PARAGUAY. Amambay: Río Apa, 1901 – 02, Hassler 8265 (lectotype G [online image!]; isolectotype BM).	en	Guimarães, Leonardo R. S., Salazar, Gerardo A., Barros, Fábio De (2019): Lectotypifications and taxonomic notes in the Stenorrhynchos clade (Spiranthinae, Orchidaceae). Phytotaxa 394 (1): 111, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.9, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.9
03F76D26FFDCF337ACC705D772D89CC0.taxon	description	We did not find no evidence to consider Pteroglossa regia as a different species from P. macrantha. The material seen in Argentina is morphologically and genetically indistinguishable from P. macrantha of Brazil.	en	Guimarães, Leonardo R. S., Salazar, Gerardo A., Barros, Fábio De (2019): Lectotypifications and taxonomic notes in the Stenorrhynchos clade (Spiranthinae, Orchidaceae). Phytotaxa 394 (1): 111, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.9, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.9
03F76D26FFDFF337ACC7004D737F9FE8.taxon	description	Note: ― Szlachetko & Rutkowski (2008: 159) designated as lectotype both the syntypes (Dusén 7632 & 7648), a clearly untenable proposal. Thus, we choose only one of the syntypes (Dusén 7648 at S) to be the lectotype.	en	Guimarães, Leonardo R. S., Salazar, Gerardo A., Barros, Fábio De (2019): Lectotypifications and taxonomic notes in the Stenorrhynchos clade (Spiranthinae, Orchidaceae). Phytotaxa 394 (1): 111, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.9, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.9
03F76D26FFDEF336ACC707BD72469A0C.taxon	description	Notes: ― The type collection of those species was destroyed during World War II, as the most orchid types deposited at B (Merrill 1943, Butzin 1978, 1981, Hiepko 1987). Although Pabst & Dungs (1975) have cited S. foliosa to Brazil (Rio de Janeiro), they did not provide voucher information and / or illustrations supporting its presence. Unfortunately, Schlechter (1921 a, b) only cited the type specimens in the protologues and did not provide an illustration that could be considered as a candidate for a lectotype. Szlachetko & Rutkowski (2008: 165) designated as lectotype for E. macrophylla the specimen Christian s. n. supposedly at B but destroyed, a clearly untenable proposal. No other specimens have been registered since then; thus, we are unable to recognise those species.	en	Guimarães, Leonardo R. S., Salazar, Gerardo A., Barros, Fábio De (2019): Lectotypifications and taxonomic notes in the Stenorrhynchos clade (Spiranthinae, Orchidaceae). Phytotaxa 394 (1): 111, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.9, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.9
03F76D26FFDFF337ACC7060D743E9860.taxon	description	= Stenorrhynchos pedicellatum var. major Cogniaux in Chodat & Hassler (1903: 932). Lectotype (designated here): ― PARAGUAY. “ Iter ad Yerbales Montium, Sierra de Maracayu, in regione Vicine San Estanislao ”, 1898 - 99, Hassler 4311 (G [online image!]; isolectotypes BM [online image!], K [online image!], NY [online image!], P [online image!], UC [online image!], W).	en	Guimarães, Leonardo R. S., Salazar, Gerardo A., Barros, Fábio De (2019): Lectotypifications and taxonomic notes in the Stenorrhynchos clade (Spiranthinae, Orchidaceae). Phytotaxa 394 (1): 111, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.9, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.9
03F76D26FFDEF336ACC7038572579E20.taxon	description	The description of the protologue and the examination of the type material of S. stenorrhynchoides shows that this plant is conspecific with S. paraguayensis, and it is thus considered here as its synonym.	en	Guimarães, Leonardo R. S., Salazar, Gerardo A., Barros, Fábio De (2019): Lectotypifications and taxonomic notes in the Stenorrhynchos clade (Spiranthinae, Orchidaceae). Phytotaxa 394 (1): 111, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.9, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.9
03F76D26FFDEF336ACC7057975309AFC.taxon	description	Notes: ― The description of this species is very poor, failing to indicate diagnostic characteristics to differentiate it. The type specimen was not located. The author’s comments are about the medical proprieties and uses of the plant. Thus, we are not able to confirm the identity of this plant.	en	Guimarães, Leonardo R. S., Salazar, Gerardo A., Barros, Fábio De (2019): Lectotypifications and taxonomic notes in the Stenorrhynchos clade (Spiranthinae, Orchidaceae). Phytotaxa 394 (1): 111, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.9, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.9
