taxonID	type	description	language	source
03F587974265FF9D06C9F94F98DFFEDD.taxon	description	Figure 1 Notes: — Ammannia desertorum (1918) was described based on Blatter and Hallberg’s collections from the Rajasthan desert, south of Jaisalmer and Jodhpur collected during 1917. Out of the seven specimens (numbers 3341 – 3347) that were gathered from various localities as detailed in the protologue, we were only able to locate two: 3341 (CAL) and 3347 (BLAT). Thus, in compliance with article 9.3 of the ICN (Turland et al. 2018), we here designate a specimen from Jaisalmer, Devikot, Blatter & Hallberg 3347 available at BLAT as lectotype.	en	Prasanth, Arun, Sardesai, Milind M. (2024): Nomenclatural notes on type materials of fourteen names in Lythraceae. Phytotaxa 660 (3): 243-258, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3
03F587974264FF9E06C9F8E39A5FFEDD.taxon	description	Figure 2 Notes: — The name Ammannia multiflora was validly published by Roxburgh (1820), which was proposed by him in his earlier work Hortus Bengalensis (1814) based on his collection from Kolkata (then Calcutta). The specimen with barcode K 000729678 at K herbarium and illustration no. 915 from Icons Roxburghiana, kept at CAL, were the results of our search for the original specimens. Except the handwritten label “ Ammannia multiflora, ” which resembles Roxburgh’s writing when compared to Forman (1997), the specimen (K 000729678) at the K Herbarium does not contain any proof that it is the original specimen. Furthermore, we were unable to locate any other original specimen in any of the other herbaria (BM, BR, CAL, E, G, and LIV) indicated by Stafleu and Cowan (1983). Therefore, following ICN article 9.3 (Turland et al. 2018), here we select illustration no. 915 from Roxburgh’s Icons as lectotype for the name A. multiflora.	en	Prasanth, Arun, Sardesai, Milind M. (2024): Nomenclatural notes on type materials of fourteen names in Lythraceae. Phytotaxa 660 (3): 243-258, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3
03F587974266FF9F06C9FEAD98E1FDFD.taxon	description	Figure 3 Notes: — The name proposed by Heyne was validated by Clarke (1879) based on Wallich’s (1828) specimen (catalogue numbers 2106 B and C). Stating “ Lectotype: Wallich cat. No. 2106 (K), ” Graham & Gandhi (2013) established the Wallich specimen in K as the lectotype (first step) according to Art. 9.3 of the ICN (Turland et al. 2018). In Kew herbarium, there are five specimens K 001115170 – 74, belonging to the same gathering of Wallich cat. no. 2106. K 001115171 and K 001115172 are barcodes of Wallich cat. no. 2106 B and 2106 C respectively. According to Art. 9.17 of the ICN, we have selected K 001115171 (K) as the lectotype in this case since it matches with the protologue quite well (Turnland et al., 2018). This constitutes a second step lectotypification.	en	Prasanth, Arun, Sardesai, Milind M. (2024): Nomenclatural notes on type materials of fourteen names in Lythraceae. Phytotaxa 660 (3): 243-258, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3
03F587974261FF9806C9FEAD988FFE4D.taxon	description	Figure 4 Notes: — Ammannia vesicatoria was first proposed in Hortus Bengalensis (1814), and legitimately published in Roxburgh’s Flora Indica (1820). The original Roxburgh collections associated with the name could not be located in the herbaria where Roxburgh specimens are deposited. Here, we designate Roxburgh’s drawing no. 35, available in CAL, as the lectotype following article 9.3 of ICN (Turland et al. 2018).	en	Prasanth, Arun, Sardesai, Milind M. (2024): Nomenclatural notes on type materials of fourteen names in Lythraceae. Phytotaxa 660 (3): 243-258, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3
03F587974261FF9906C9F92D9813FE69.taxon	description	APR 0040 (CAL!). Figure 5 Notes: — Two specimens are housed at E E 01007803, which was most likely gathered by Stocks and Law, and E 01007802. The later sheet E 01007802 has two unpublished names of Wight annotated by W. J. Hooker. It appears that neither specimen is the type. Moreover, we were unable to locate any specimens in the K or CAL herbaria. Nevertheless, we were able to find two specimens from the Wight’s 1871 collection at MH, bearing two labels identifying them as Ameletia floribunda and “ Type material ” annotated by Clarke and Thomas Mathew respectively. However, neither specimen has any evidence indicating that it is a type material. According to Art. 9.3 of the ICN, we are designating Wight’s illustration in Madras Journal of Literature Sciences 5: t 20 (1837), published together with the name, as a lectotype (Turland et al. 2018). Rotala floribunda is known for its homo- and heterostylous flowers. Wight’s illustration depicts only heterostylous flower, therefore here we designate our collection from Mahabaleshwar deposited in CAL as an epitype following Art. 9.9 of ICN (Turland et al. 2019).	en	Prasanth, Arun, Sardesai, Milind M. (2024): Nomenclatural notes on type materials of fourteen names in Lythraceae. Phytotaxa 660 (3): 243-258, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3
03F587974260FF9A06C9F9A19E9BFEF9.taxon	description	Figure 6 Notes: — Arnott proposed the name Ammannia illecerbroides (mss) using Wight’s collection (Wight 2713), based on which Koehne (1880) published the name R. illecebroides. In 1979, Cook designated the Herb. Wight Propr. 2713 as a type for the name, citing the following information: “ Type: India, “ Peninsula Ind. Orientalis ”, Herb. Wight propr. No. 2317 (holotype: K; isotype: K, G) ”. This constitute the first step lectotypification. At K, we were able to track down two specimens of HWP 2317 (K 000729643! and K 000729644!). As per Art. 9.3 and 9.17 of ICN (Turland et al. 2018), we have designated HWP no. 2317, K 000729643! as the lectotype which constitute the second step lectotypification.	en	Prasanth, Arun, Sardesai, Milind M. (2024): Nomenclatural notes on type materials of fourteen names in Lythraceae. Phytotaxa 660 (3): 243-258, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3
03F587974263FF9B06C9F9329E51FE95.taxon	description	Figure 7 Notes: — Cook (1979) designated the Wallich catalogue number 2095 H (K) collection as a type based on Koehne’s (1903) reference to “ Wahrscheinlich Nepal, Wallich no. 2095 H. ” However, Koehne (1880) did not cite any Wallich specimens in his protologue; instead, he stated “ As. Mons. Ind. Or., locis non indicates, mixta cum 28. ” Koehne (1880) also mentioned consulting Wight and Arnott 28 in the footnote. This indicates that Koehne later studied the Wallich’s specimen (2095 H). Further R. macrandra is restricted to Peninsular India. We looked in herbaria where Wight’s collections are deposited, but we were unable to locate the specimen. Here, we designate Wight’s illustration provided in Icones Wight 1 t. 258, cited in the protologue, as the lectotype in accordance to Art. 9.3 (Turland et al. 2018).	en	Prasanth, Arun, Sardesai, Milind M. (2024): Nomenclatural notes on type materials of fourteen names in Lythraceae. Phytotaxa 660 (3): 243-258, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3
03F587974262FF9B06C9F89698DFF791.taxon	description	Figure 8 Notes: — Cook (1979) in his revisionary work mentioned ‘ Type: Burma, Sagaing (Segain, Segaen) 1826, Wallich 2096 (Holotype:? CAL n. v.; isotypes: G, K-W, LE’. As mentioned by Cook (1979), we were unable to find the Wallich’s specimen (cat. no. 2096) in CAL, G, and LE. However, we were able to find two specimens that match the protologue in the K Herbarium (K 001115130 and K 000729615). The specimen K 001115130, which is housed in the Kew herbarium, is recognized as the lectotype in accordance to Art. 9.3 (Turland et al. 2018).	en	Prasanth, Arun, Sardesai, Milind M. (2024): Nomenclatural notes on type materials of fourteen names in Lythraceae. Phytotaxa 660 (3): 243-258, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3
03F58797426DFF9406C9F8399A7BF841.taxon	description	Figure 9 Notes: — Koehne (1880) described the name R. wallichii based on Hydrolythrum wallichii Hook. f. (1867), citing Gomez’s collection included in Wallich catalogue (no. 9059) from Tavoy. The Wallich’s specimen was then identified as the type by Cook (1979), citing “ Type: Burma, Tavoy, 1827, Gomez, Wall. cat. no. 9059 (holotype: K-w; isotypes: K, G, LE) ” in his revision. This constitutes a first step lectotypication as at K we were able to find five specimens of Wallich 9059 (K 001132153, K 001132154, K 00729665, K 00729666, and K 00729667). Following ICN Articles 9.3 and 9.17 (Turland et al. 2018), we hereby designate K 00729665 as the lectotype which constitutes the second step lectotypification.	en	Prasanth, Arun, Sardesai, Milind M. (2024): Nomenclatural notes on type materials of fourteen names in Lythraceae. Phytotaxa 660 (3): 243-258, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3
03F58797426CFF9506C9F8B69943F871.taxon	description	Figure 10 Notes: — Kurz (1872) based on his collection from the Andaman Islands described the name Lagerstroemia hypoleuca. Furtado and Srisuko (1969) designated type without stating the specimen number as ‘ Port Blair, Kurz s. n.: CAL — lectoholotype (flower) & lectoparatype (fruit) ’. This constitute the first step lectotypification. Here we designate one of the two specimens CAL 0000010206 in CAL as lectotype, which constitute the second step lectotypification following Art. 9.3 & 9.17 of ICN (Turland et al. 2018).	en	Prasanth, Arun, Sardesai, Milind M. (2024): Nomenclatural notes on type materials of fourteen names in Lythraceae. Phytotaxa 660 (3): 243-258, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3
03F58797426FFF9606C9FB6C98F7F800.taxon	materials_examined	INDIA: Arunachal Pradesh, near Bomjur, 03.12.1913, U. N. Kanjilal 3107 (ASSAM 0000000187!); Lali nadi, Sadiya, 27.09.1931, P. C. Kanjilal 9513 (ASSAM 0000000188!, ASSAM 0000000189!). Figure 11 Notes: — Debbarman first proposed the name L. minuticarpa (mss. hebr.) based on collections of U. N. Kanjilal 3107 housed in Shillong herbarium (ASSAM), which was later validly published by Kanjilal (1934) along with P. C. Kanjilal 9512, 9513 and G. H. Caves 6832 (CAL) collections from Assam and Sikkim respectively. We were not able to locate G. H. Cave’s collection in CAL as cited in the protologue, instead, we were able to locate three duplicates of U. N. Kanjilal 3107, but has no evidence these duplicates were consulted while describing the name. Further, the citation of P. C. Kanjilal 9513 in the protologue contradicts its collector information on the herbarium sheet where it was mentioned as ‘ Collector U. N. Kanjilal’. However, according to Stafleu and Cowan (1979) period of U. N. Kanjilal is between 1859 – 1928, specimen 9513 was collected on 27 th September 1931, probably it’s an orthographic error in specimen identifier. Hence, here we designate P. C. Kanjilal 9512 collection (ASSAM 0000000190!) which bears a flowering twig as lectotype in accordance to Art. 9.3 (Turland et al. 2018).	en	Prasanth, Arun, Sardesai, Milind M. (2024): Nomenclatural notes on type materials of fourteen names in Lythraceae. Phytotaxa 660 (3): 243-258, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3
03F58797426EFF9706C9FB5798E3F90B.taxon	description	Notes: — Teijsmann and Binnendijk described L. ovalifolia in 1851 using specimens collected from Java. Herbarium and types of Binnendijk are available in BO and K, according to Stafleu and Cowan (1976). However, we were unable to locate the original materials in BO and K. Instead, we could find three sheets annotated by Binnendijk gathered from Java at L Herbarium (L. 0931236!, L. 2479644!, and L. 2479649!). In accordance with article 9.3 of the ICN (Turland et al. (2018), we designate specimen L. 0931236 with flowers as the lectotype.	en	Prasanth, Arun, Sardesai, Milind M. (2024): Nomenclatural notes on type materials of fourteen names in Lythraceae. Phytotaxa 660 (3): 243-258, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3
03F58797426EFF9706C9F8FF9FFAF7BF.taxon	description	Figure 13 Notes: — In his description of L. parviflora var. benghalensis, Clarke (1879) cited the Wallich catalogue number 2119 from Nepal (Nipal), Mrs. Mack’s collection from Myanmar (Burma / Birma), C. B. Clarke’s, J. D. Hooker’s and J. S. Gamble’s collection from Sikkim, and Griffith Icon Pl. Asiat. T. 592. All of the specimens mentioned above are deposited at CAL, and K, except Gamble and Mrs. Mack’s collections. Following article 9.3 of the ICN (Turland et al. 2018), we have designated Wallich cat. no. 2119, available at K (K 001115236!) as the lectotype.	en	Prasanth, Arun, Sardesai, Milind M. (2024): Nomenclatural notes on type materials of fourteen names in Lythraceae. Phytotaxa 660 (3): 243-258, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3
03F587974269FF9006C9FBC698F9F8BA.taxon	materials_examined	Lectotype (designated here): — THAILAND (Siam). Pahombuk Mountains, near Muang-fuang, Hosseus 600 (E, E 00284579!, isolectotype: BM, BM 000944597!, L, L. 0010067!); Pratype: Dai-Sutep, East side, Hosseus 512 (BM, BM 000944596!; E, E 00284589!; L, L. 0010068!).	en	Prasanth, Arun, Sardesai, Milind M. (2024): Nomenclatural notes on type materials of fourteen names in Lythraceae. Phytotaxa 660 (3): 243-258, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3
03F587974269FF9006C9FBC698F9F8BA.taxon	description	Figure 14 Notes: — Koehne (1908) described the name citing Hosseus’ collections (Hosseus no. 512, 600, 605) from Thailand (Siam). We were able to trace six sheets from three herbaria BM, E, and L. Here we designate Hosseus 600 housed at E, E 00284579 as lectotype in accordance to Art. 9.3 (Turland et al. 2018).	en	Prasanth, Arun, Sardesai, Milind M. (2024): Nomenclatural notes on type materials of fourteen names in Lythraceae. Phytotaxa 660 (3): 243-258, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.660.3.3
