taxonID	type	description	language	source
03F3A175FFA69958EAEDBAF9BB4AF912.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. 1 ♂, 5 ♀♀: East Âzarbâijân Prov.: • 1 ♂, 1 ♀, Kaleybar, Âinâlou, Alhord, Arasbârân forest, N 38 ˚ 55 ΄ 1.1 ˝, E 46 ˚ 47 ΄ 38 ˝, 1440 m, 28. vii. 2007, Zahiri, Falsafi, Âlipanâh leg. (gen. prep. HA- 2586, HMIM); • 2 ♀♀, Kaleybar, Tâtâr, Gharghâvol Res. St., N 38 ˚ 21´53.9 ˝, E 47 ˚ 51´43.4 ˝, 345 m, 27. vii. 2007, Âlipanâh, Zahiri, Falsafi leg. (gen. prep. HA- 2597, HMIM); • 1 ♀, Arasbârân protected area, between Tâzehkand and Vinâgh, N 38 ˚ 59´56.6 ˝, E 46 ˚ 57´45.4 ˝, 1194 m, 23. vi. 2015, Nâserzâdeh, Hâjiesmailiân, Montreuil leg.; Mâzandarân Prov.: • 1 ♀, Râmsar, 6 km Javâherdeh vill., N 36 ˚ 54´29.3 ˝, E 50 ˚ 35´13.2 ˝, 554 m, 23. vii. 2007, Âlipanâh, Zahiri leg. (gen. prep. HA- 2631, HMIM).	en	Alipanah, Helen, Slamka, František (2021): On the genus Elegia Ragonot, 1887 (Pyralidae: Phycitinae: Phycitini) from Iran with description of Elegia kharazii sp. nov. Zootaxa 4999 (3): 285-297, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4999.3.8
03F3A175FFA69958EAEDBAF9BB4AF912.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Forewing (Fig. 1 A) 7.6 – 8.1 mm. (x = 7.8 mm ± 0.19 mm, n = 5), relatively elongate, with slightly arched costa and oblique termen. Upperside with brownish-grey ground colour, a well-developed dark ante-median band rather straight distally and almost indistinct at proximal side, lined with whitish-grey strip at distal end (Slamka 2019), a broken light grey post-median line with a greyish-brown shadow at the proximal side, a pair of hardly visible, dark discal spots. Fringes chequered with dirty-cream and brown scales; underside slightly paler than the upperside, with traces of ante-median band and post-median line. Hindwing upperside pale greyish-brown, veins visible. Fringes dirty-cream, with rows of darker short scales basally; underside nearly the same as the upperside. Male genitalia (Figs. 1 E ‒ G) with a clearly long and slightly truncated uncus, faintly broadened basally with a constriction at the junction with tegumen; tegumen short, about half length of the uncus, gnathos straight, well sclerotized, terminally hooked, slightly longer than about half the length of the uncus; labides moderate, margins subparallel, spines ordered internally, with a pair of long symmetrical spines medio-laterally (Fig. 1 F); valva elongate, nearly parallel sided, with a strongly sclerotized large clasper having tuberculate edge; juxta almost trapezoidal, nearly straight posteriorly; aedeagus slightly broadened near the apex, with a relatively short and narrow dentate sclerotized plate and few scattered spines anteriorly, length of the sclerotized plate nearly 0.20 of the length of aedeagus (Fig. 1 G) Culcita with median process apically rounded and broadened towards the base, four wavy elements on each side, anterior edge with a pointed sclerotized projection medially (Fig. 1 H). Female genitalia (Figs. 1 B – D) with papillae anales triangular, setose; apophyses posteriores longer and narrower than apophyses anteriores, its length more than two times the length of apophyses anteriores; lamina antevaginalis sclerotized, broad bilobed plates sparsely covered by fine spines (Fig. 1 B-a), lamina postvaginalis with a deep, flat-bottomed, U-shaped notch at the apex (Fig. 1 C); antrum sclerotized, with a pair of symmetrical rounded spinose protuberances; ductus bursa sclerotized, shorter than corpus bursae, slightly broadened towards the antrum, with sclerotized longitudinal mid-ventral folds; corpus bursae nearly oval, with spinulate surface, except the posterior end at right side, medial spinules conspicuously larger than the others, posterior end of corpus bursae next to the junction with ductus bursa with a slightly sclerotized spiny shield; ductus seminalis arises on a small vesicle at the anterior right part of the corpus bursae in ventral view; posterior edge of abdominal segment VIII membranous and weakly depressed medially, its anterior edge with a very well defined strongly sclerotized parallelsided protuberance having rounded to irregularly rounded apex, directed towards the ductus bursa (Fig. 1 D).	en	Alipanah, Helen, Slamka, František (2021): On the genus Elegia Ragonot, 1887 (Pyralidae: Phycitinae: Phycitini) from Iran with description of Elegia kharazii sp. nov. Zootaxa 4999 (3): 285-297, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4999.3.8
03F3A175FFA69958EAEDBAF9BB4AF912.taxon	discussion	Remark. Some large (sclerotized) structures in segment VIII are provisionally accepted here as lamina ante- and postvaginalis sensu Busck in Obenberger (1964: 116, fig. 122). It is not clear what is their function and maybe they are only sclerotized plates of the VIII segment (sternite).	en	Alipanah, Helen, Slamka, František (2021): On the genus Elegia Ragonot, 1887 (Pyralidae: Phycitinae: Phycitini) from Iran with description of Elegia kharazii sp. nov. Zootaxa 4999 (3): 285-297, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4999.3.8
03F3A175FFA69958EAEDBAF9BB4AF912.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Not known precisely owing to confusion with E. fallax (Slamka 2019).	en	Alipanah, Helen, Slamka, František (2021): On the genus Elegia Ragonot, 1887 (Pyralidae: Phycitinae: Phycitini) from Iran with description of Elegia kharazii sp. nov. Zootaxa 4999 (3): 285-297, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4999.3.8
03F3A175FFA69958EAEDBAF9BB4AF912.taxon	discussion	Remarks. This species can be found in xerothermic oak forests (Slamka 2019). It is newly reported for the fauna of Iran.	en	Alipanah, Helen, Slamka, František (2021): On the genus Elegia Ragonot, 1887 (Pyralidae: Phycitinae: Phycitini) from Iran with description of Elegia kharazii sp. nov. Zootaxa 4999 (3): 285-297, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4999.3.8
03F3A175FFA6995CEAEDBD0EBF5DFBE1.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. 10 ♂♂, 11 ♀♀: Châhârmahâl and Bakhtiâri Prov.: • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀, Lordegân, N 31 ˚ 32´33 ˝, E 50 ˚ 57´16.92 ˝, 2352 m, 15. viii. 2010, Âlipanâh, Nematiân leg.; Fârs Prov.: • 1 ♀, Kâzerun, 5. vii. 1970, Safavi, Hâshemi leg.; • 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀, Kâzerun, Nowdân, 1250 m, 15. iv. 1975, Borumand leg. (gen. prep. HA- 2576, HMIM); • 2 ♀♀, Kâzerun, Gâw Koshak, 1170 m, 16. iv. 1975, Borumand leg. (gen. prep. HA- 2593, HMIM); • 1 ♂, Tang-e Chogân, 30 km N. Kâzerun, 930 m, 23. iii. 1973, Abâi leg. (gen. prep. HA- 2629, HMIM); Kermânshâh Prov.: • 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀, Mâhidasht, Châhârzebar-e Olyâ, 1500 m, 21. viii. 1996, Parchami-Arâghi, Barâri, V. Nazari leg. (gen. prep. HA- 2630, HMIM); Kohgiluyeh and Boyerahmad Prov.: • 1 ♂, Yâsuj, Tang-e Meymand, 1650 m, 9. ix. 1971, Ebrâhimi, Badii leg.; • 1 ♂, Yâsuj, Tang-e Sorkh, 12 – 13. vi. 1986, Mirzâyâns, Hâshemi leg.; Kordestân Prov.: • 1 ♂, 1 ♀, Marivân, Shahid Chamrân Campus (Oak forest), N 35 ˚ 29´52.6 ˝, E 46 ˚ 10´12.06 ˝, 1392 m, 11. ix. 2011, Âlipanâh, Falsafi leg.; Lorestân Prov.: • 1 ♀, Tang-e Malâvi, 720 m, 24. iv. 1976, Pâzuki, Abâi leg.; • 1 ♂, Mamasani, Châhchenâr, 3 – 19. v. 1975, Abâi leg.; • 1 ♀, 24 km Khorram Âbâd, 26. vii. 1973, Mirzâyâns, Zairi leg.; • 1 ♀, Khorram Âbâd, Badr Âbâd, 1200 m, 13. v. 1994, Sarafrâzi, Hâshemi leg. (gen. prep. HA- 2598, HMIM).	en	Alipanah, Helen, Slamka, František (2021): On the genus Elegia Ragonot, 1887 (Pyralidae: Phycitinae: Phycitini) from Iran with description of Elegia kharazii sp. nov. Zootaxa 4999 (3): 285-297, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4999.3.8
03F3A175FFA6995CEAEDBD0EBF5DFBE1.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. We examined two males and two females of an Elegia species collected in Fars Province. The female genitalia were exactly the same as in E. iozona illustrated by Slamka (2019: 273). The male genitalia were also very similar to E. saecula, recently described by Kemal, Kýzýldað & Koçak (2020). Additional specimens of this species were found in HMIM collected in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, Kermanshah, Kohgiluyeh and Boyerahmad, Kordestan and Lorestan Provinces, indicating the local distribution of this species in W and SW Iran. By examining the photograph of male genitalia of holotype of E. iozona (Fig. 3 I) and comparing genitalia structures with our examined Iranian males, it was concluded, that male genitalia of E. saecula and E. iozona are similar to each other in many aspects. In both taxa the shape of the valva, small clasper, vinculum, tegumen and labides are almost the same and the uncus in both species is triangular, short, and expanded basally. However, there are differences as follows: 1) Kemal et al. (2020), stated that in E. saecula the sclerotized plate at distal end of aedeagus is dentate and bilaterally serrate (Fig. 4 B). The shape of this structure is not obvious in the genitalia slide of E. iozona holotype (Fig. 3 I), but in the Iranian males examined the sclerotized plate has scattered spines throughout the surface (Fig. 3 C), and under the cover glass it may seem to be dentate at one side (Fig. 3 B). Therefore, the serrate sides of sclerotized dentate plate at distal end of aedeagus may simply be an artefact of the amount of compression applied to the glass cover slide. 2) According to Kemal et al. (op. cit.), in E. saecula spines at the surface of labides are regularly arranged inward at base and are irregular terminally (Fig. 4 C-b); however, owing to the poor quality of the genitalia slide of the E. iozona holotype, the position of spines at the surface of labides is unclear (Fig. 3 I-a). In the Iranian E. iozona males examined, the shape of the labides and its spines (Figs. 3 A, F, G) were identical to those of E. saecula. 3) In E. saecula the gnathos is ovoid, spoon-shaped distally, with an angular tip (Fig. 4 C-a) (cf. Kemal et al. 2020: 3, 7). In E. iozona, the holotype gnathos is oval with rounded apex (Fig. 3 I-b); in the Iranian E. iozona males examined it is oval under the cover slide (Fig. 3 E), but its real shape is oval and nearly spoon-shaped apically with angular tip (Fig. 3 F) — more obvious in lateral view (Fig. 3 D). 4) Kemal et al. (op. cit.) stated that in E. saecula, the tapering median process of the culcita is well developed, and its distinct terminal head has a central tooth. In the male genitalia slide of E. iozona holotype, the median process of culcita is turned right and hence its actual shape is not obvious. In the examined males of E. iozona collected in Iran, there is no tooth here. Elegia saecula was described based on 19 males and females collected in the South-East Turkey (Mardin Prov.). Despite the presence of females among the specimens, there is no description or illustration of the female in Kemal et al. (2020). The authors asked for the paratype of female of E. saecula, but the material or figures were not sent by the manuscript deadline. In summary, the only significant difference between the males of E. iozona and E. saecula is the presence of a central tooth at the apex of the median process of the culcita, which is missing in E. iozona. The latter difference may be due to an intraspecific variation. Therefore, here we consider E. saecula Kemal, Kýzýldað & Koçak, 2020 as a junior synonym of E. iozona (Meyrick, 1937).	en	Alipanah, Helen, Slamka, František (2021): On the genus Elegia Ragonot, 1887 (Pyralidae: Phycitinae: Phycitini) from Iran with description of Elegia kharazii sp. nov. Zootaxa 4999 (3): 285-297, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4999.3.8
03F3A175FFA6995CEAEDBD0EBF5DFBE1.taxon	description	Redescription. Male and female are externally similar. Forewing (Figs. 2 A, B) relatively elongate, with outwardly arched costa and obliquely rounded termen. Length of the forewing 7.0 – 9.6 mm (x = 8.21 mm ± 0.69 mm, n = 21); upperside greyish-brown, with a blackish ante-median band slightly widened medially (nearly Oshaped as stated in Slamka (2019 )), lined from both sides by off-white lines surrounded by darker scales outwardly, a nearly zigzag grayish-white post-median line surrounded on both sides by dark scales which are slightly darker and more prominent near costal margin, and a pair of dark discal spots. Fringes chequered with brown and cream scales; underside slightly paler than the upperside, with traces of ante-median, and post-median lines, and some specimens with almost pinkish-gray costal margin (Fig. 2 B). Hindwing pale grayish-brown at margins and paler towards the base. Fringes dirty-cream, with rows of darker short scales basally; underside nearly same as the upperside. Male genitalia (Figs. 3 A – G) with short, triangular uncus, broadened basally; tegumen large, broadened medially, its length longer than the length of uncus; gnathos ovoid, terminally spoon-shaped, with nearly angular tip (Figs. 3 F, D) but almost rounded under cover slide (Figs. 3 A, E); labides short oval terminally, with basal spines inwarded regularly and irregularly arranged distal spines (Figs. 3 A, D (lateral view), F, G); valva elongate, nearly parallel sided, slightly narrowing near the apex, with a more sclerotized costal margin, and a small apical projection at the end of costa, ventral clasper nearly finger-shaped; juxta trapezoidal, with a small median notch at posterior edge; aedeagus slightly broadened near the distal end, but narrowing distally, with a dentate sclerotized plate at distal end (Figs. 3 B, C), sometimes appearing as a unilaterally dentate plate under cover-slide (Fig. 3 B). Culcita with median process tapering distally and forming a terminal head, four wavy elements on each side, anterior edge with a pointed sclerotized projection medially (Fig. 3 H). Female genitalia (Figs. 2 C, D) with papillae anales sub-triangular, setose; apophyses posteriores almost two times the length of apophyses anteriores; lamina antevaginalis sclerotized, broad, bilobed plates sparsely covered by spines (Fig. 2 C-a); lamina postvaginalis apically with two rounded projections (Fig. 2 D-a); antrum sclerotized, with two symmetrical rounded protuberance having a few scattered spines on its surface; ductus bursa sclerotized, shorter than corpus bursae, with longitudinal sclerotized ventral folds concentrated medially at posterior half, but throughout the ventral surface at anterior half; corpus bursae nearly oval, with spinulate surface, except the anterior end at right side (in ventral view), medial spinules conspicuously larger than the others, posterior end of corpus bursae next to the junction with ductus bursa with a slightly sclerotized more or less oval-shaped spiny shield; ductus seminalis arises on a small vesicle at the anterior end of corpus bursae at right side (in ventral view), anterior edge with a nearly triangular and apically rounded protuberance extended to behind the antrum (Fig. 2 D-b).	en	Alipanah, Helen, Slamka, František (2021): On the genus Elegia Ragonot, 1887 (Pyralidae: Phycitinae: Phycitini) from Iran with description of Elegia kharazii sp. nov. Zootaxa 4999 (3): 285-297, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4999.3.8
03F3A175FFA6995CEAEDBD0EBF5DFBE1.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Iraq (type locality), Iran (Fars Province: W Shiraz, and Shiraz- Kazerun Rd. (Mian Kotal )), Turkey, Lebanon (Meyrick 1937; Amsel 1953; Roesler 1988; Slamka 2019).	en	Alipanah, Helen, Slamka, František (2021): On the genus Elegia Ragonot, 1887 (Pyralidae: Phycitinae: Phycitini) from Iran with description of Elegia kharazii sp. nov. Zootaxa 4999 (3): 285-297, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4999.3.8
03F3A175FFA6995CEAEDBD0EBF5DFBE1.taxon	discussion	Remark 1. Elegia iozona was reported from Iran as Ichorarchis iozona elegiella Amsel, 1953 and collected in Fars Province (Mian Kotal). Ichorarchis iozana elegiella was incorrectly considered as a junior synonym of E. fallax by Roesler (1988). Later it was synonymized with E. iozona by Slamka (2019). Elegia iozona was described by Meyrick (1937) based on a single male collected in Iraq (Diana). Kemal et al. (2020) stated that taxonomic status of this species and its validity is unclear and needs further revision; however, it was proposed as a bona species by Slamka (2019). The photo of the male (holotype) specimen as well as illustrations of a female collected in SE Turkey, and two females collected in Iran (Fars Province) including the paratype of E. iozona elegiella were presented by Slamka (2019). Remark 2. Huertas-Dionisio et al. (2016) stated that in Turkey and Iran E. fallax has been collected in places where Quercus petraea iberica (Steven ex M. Bieb.) Krassiln. and Q. robur L. grow. In view of the incorrect synonym of I. iozona elegiella with E. fallax by Roesler (1988), these host plants most probably relate to E. iozona.	en	Alipanah, Helen, Slamka, František (2021): On the genus Elegia Ragonot, 1887 (Pyralidae: Phycitinae: Phycitini) from Iran with description of Elegia kharazii sp. nov. Zootaxa 4999 (3): 285-297, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4999.3.8
03F3A175FFA29953EAEDBD1DB95BF849.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. Holotype: • ♂, Golestân Prov.: Golestân National Park, Mazârli, 530 m, 19. - 20. vi. 1977, Pâzuki, Abâi leg. (gen. prep. HA- 2578, HMIM). Paratypes: 2 ♀♀: • 1 ♀, same data as the holotype (gen. prep. HA- 2599, HMIM); • 1 ♀, Gilân Prov.: Shaft, Ahmad Gurâb, Siâhmezgi vill., N 37 ˚ 0.00´54.86 ˝, E 49 ˚ 15´7.95 ˝, 626 m, 23. vii. 2010, Âlipanâh, Falsafi leg. (gen. prep. HA- 2632, HMIM).	en	Alipanah, Helen, Slamka, František (2021): On the genus Elegia Ragonot, 1887 (Pyralidae: Phycitinae: Phycitini) from Iran with description of Elegia kharazii sp. nov. Zootaxa 4999 (3): 285-297, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4999.3.8
03F3A175FFA29953EAEDBD1DB95BF849.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Elegia kharazii is externally similar to E. similella, but the hindwings are paler, greyish-brown, while in E. similella brownish (Figs. 7 A, B). The male genitalia are similar to E. similella, but differ in the following characters: 1) In E. kharazii the labides are quite different, club-shaped, with the strong spines situated on interior and interio-distal end (Figs. 6 A, C), while in E. similella labides are in shape of oblong lobes almost whole densely covered by thin, sclerotized spines (Figs. 7 C, D). 2) Distal end of gnathos in E. similella is more or less hook-shaped (Figs. 7 C, D) (cf. Slamka 2019: 172); while it is relatively straight in E. kharazii (Fig. 6 A). 3) In E. kharazii valva has a small costal projection at the apex (Fig. 6 A-a); while in E. similella apical part of valva (cucullus) is more or less rounded or only with a small costal projection (Fig. 7 C-a). 4) Culcita in E. similella has more wavy scale elements (Fig. 7 F) than in E. kharazii (Fig. 6 F). The important difference in the female genitalia of E. similella and E. kharazii is in the shape of paired sclerotized shield in the lamina antevaginalis, which in these two species is apparently different. In E. similella it has triangular shape (Fig. 8 D-a), in E. kharazii nearly trapezoid (Figs. 8 A-a, C-a).	en	Alipanah, Helen, Slamka, František (2021): On the genus Elegia Ragonot, 1887 (Pyralidae: Phycitinae: Phycitini) from Iran with description of Elegia kharazii sp. nov. Zootaxa 4999 (3): 285-297, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4999.3.8
03F3A175FFA29953EAEDBD1DB95BF849.taxon	description	Description. Male (Figs. 5 A, B, E, F). Head: Nearly smooth, brown, apically white scales; scales on vertex elongate; labial palpus sinuate with third segment pointed, brown, apically white scales dorso-laterally, except creamy-white base of first segment, length 2.17 times the diameter of eye (n = 1), second segment the longest (Fig. 5 F); antennae ringed with cream and brown scales; at base of flagellum is well developed sinus surrounded by raised scales (Fig. 5 E; white arrow). Thorax: Patagia smooth scaled, brown, apically white dorsally. Forewing (Figs. 5 A, B) relatively elongate, with outwardly arched costa and oblique termen. Length of the forewing 8.4 mm (n = 1); upperside dark grey, basal band slightly darker than the ground colour with straight distal side, indistinct proximally, ante-median line whitish-grey, not quite reaching the costa, post-median line narrow, slightly lighter than the ground colour almost zigzag and hardly visible, paired dark discal spots scarcely visible, fringes chequered with brown and greyish-cream scales; underside slightly paler than the upperside, with traces of ante-median and post-median lines. Hindwing pale greyish-brown, slightly paler towards the base, fringes pale greyish-brown, with rows of darker short scales basally; underside more or less the same as the upperside. Abdomen: Brown, distally cream on each segment. Male genitalia (Figs. 6 A ‒ E). Uncus nearly triangular with truncated tip, constricted at the junction with tegumen; gnathos shorter than uncus, nearly pointed apically and slightly broadened at base (Fig. 6 A); labides strongly sclerotized, club-shaped at posterior end, shorter than the length of uncus, with strongly sclerotized dense thick spines at both posterior and posterio-internal sides (Fig. 6 C); valva elongate, with a rounded apex having a small apico-costal projection (Fig. 6 A-a), clasper short triangular (Fig. 6 D); juxta nearly trapezoidal with a weak depression posterio-medially; aedeagus slightly broadened near distal end, with a longitudinal dentate sclerotized plate (Figs. 6 B, E). Culcita with an apically rounded and broadened basally median process and four wavy elements on each side, anterior edge with a pointed sclerotized projection medially (Fig. 6 F). Female (Figs. 5 C, D, G). Head and Thorax: As described for male. Antennae filiform, creamy-brownish ringed; length of labial palpus 2.00 – 2.12 times the diameter of eye (n = 2); forewing (Figs. 5 C, D) length of 7.8 – 8.3 mm (x = 8.05 mm ± 0.35, n = 2); as described for the male. Abdomen: Externally as in male. Female genitalia (Figs. 8 A ‒ C). Papillae anales sub-triangular, setose; apophyses posteriores much longer than apophyses anteriores, nearly two times the length of apophyses anteriores; lamina antevaginalis with a pair of sclerotized trapezoid-shape shields, with a slightly sclerotized plate below it containing dense tubercles at medial, lateral, and posterior-lateral sides (Fig. 8 B-a); antrum sclerotized, slightly prominent posterio-medially, with small spines at the middle narrowly extended towards the lateral sides; ductus bursa sclerotized, shorter than corpus bursae, with deep sclerotized longitudinal ventral wrinkles extended to near the junction with corpus bursae, and a large transverse folding at the junction with corpus bursae; corpus bursae oval, with spinulate surface, except the anterior end at right side (in ventral view), medial spinules conspicuously larger than the others, posterior end of corpus bursae next to the junction with ductus bursa with a slightly sclerotized spiny shield not reaching to the edge of corpus bursae; ductus seminalis arises on a small vesicle at the anterior right part of the corpus bursae in ventral view; abdominal segment VIII sclerotized, with a very deep V-shaped groove posteriorly and a wide triangular and apically rounded projection anteriorly extended to slightly beyond the antrum, posterio-lateral edges with a pair of strongly sclerotized nearly triangular areas (Fig. 8 B-b).	en	Alipanah, Helen, Slamka, František (2021): On the genus Elegia Ragonot, 1887 (Pyralidae: Phycitinae: Phycitini) from Iran with description of Elegia kharazii sp. nov. Zootaxa 4999 (3): 285-297, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4999.3.8
03F3A175FFA29953EAEDBD1DB95BF849.taxon	etymology	Etymology. Named in honor of the Aziz Kharazi Pakdel, the famous entomologist in Iran, for his efforts in engaging students to entomology.	en	Alipanah, Helen, Slamka, František (2021): On the genus Elegia Ragonot, 1887 (Pyralidae: Phycitinae: Phycitini) from Iran with description of Elegia kharazii sp. nov. Zootaxa 4999 (3): 285-297, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4999.3.8
03F3A175FFA29953EAEDBD1DB95BF849.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Iran, so far Gilan and Golestan Provinces.	en	Alipanah, Helen, Slamka, František (2021): On the genus Elegia Ragonot, 1887 (Pyralidae: Phycitinae: Phycitini) from Iran with description of Elegia kharazii sp. nov. Zootaxa 4999 (3): 285-297, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4999.3.8
