identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03F0BE50FFC5FF9EFF4AF8E8BD7DC0A2.text	03F0BE50FFC5FF9EFF4AF8E8BD7DC0A2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arctiini Leach 1815	<div><p>Arctiinae, Arctiini, Phaegopterina</p><p>Automolis codasi Jörgensen, 1935: 110 (Fig. 3)</p><p>Current identity. Ormetica codasi (Jörgensen, 1935) Type Material. Holotype and undisclosed number of paratypes.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Male paratype with the following labels: “22”; “#32716”; (old catalogue number); [Paraguay, Departamento de Guairá, Villarrica] (information of localities from original description only); “ Automolis codasi Jorg [ersen]. Mus[eo]. Nac[ional]. Hist[oria]. Natural Buenos Aires”; “ TYPUS ”; “ PARATY- PUS”; “MACN-En 32211” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. The only male found is in good condition but presents a circular hole on the right hind wing.</p><p>Remarks. The whereabouts of the holotype could not be traced. Jörgensen (1935) mentioned that a paratype was donated to the MACN collection. The specimen found matches with the photography presented in the original description (Jörgensen 1935: Plate III, fig. 22). He also commented that this species is close to Automolis ochreomarginata Joicey &amp; Talbot, 1918, currently a junior synonym of Ormetica bonora (Schaus, 1905) (Vincent &amp; Laguerre 2014) .</p><p>Elysius anomala Jörgensen, 1935: 114</p><p>Current identity. Elysius anomala Jörgensen, 1935</p><p>Type Material. Unknown number of female syntypes. Material possible lost or destroyed.</p><p>Type locality and label information. [Argentina], Catamarca [province], La Playa, Cerros de Aconquija [mountains of Aconquija], 2,400 meters, February (information from original description only) .</p><p>MACN. The type material of E. anomala was not found in MACN.</p><p>Remarks. Jörgensen (1935) did not mention where the female syntypes were deposited. In the same article the catalogue number of the MACN is indicated in some descriptions, but not in this case. Jörgensen (1935) also mentioned that this species is very different from other Elysius Walker, 1855 .</p><p>Elysius pretiosa Jörgensen, 1935: 113 (Fig. 4)</p><p>Current identity. Elysius pretiosa Jörgensen, 1935</p><p>Type Material. Female holotype.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Female holotype with the following labels: “#32795” (old catalogue number); “[Paraguay, Caazapá], Tapytá, XII-[1]925”; “Typus”; “ Elysius prectiosa [sic] Jorg[ensen]. Mus[eo]. Nac[ional]. Hist[oria]. Natural Buenos Aires”; “ HOLOTYPUS ”; “MACN-En 32212” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. The female holotype is in moderate condition; the apex of the right forewing is missing as in the black and white photo of the original description .</p><p>Remarks. Similar to Elysius magnifica Rothschild, 1909 (Jörgensen 1935) but differs in color and coloration pattern.</p><p>Hypothaema (sic) caroei Jörgensen, 1935: 109</p><p>Current identity. Hyperthaema caroei Jörgensen, 1935</p><p>Type Material. Female holotype. Material possibly lost or destroyed.</p><p>Type locality and label information. [#32715] (old catalogue number); [Paraguay, Villarrica, Estancia Tapytá]; [Holotypus]; [♀] (information from original description only).</p><p>MACN. The type material of H. caroei was not found in MACN.</p><p>Remarks. Jörgensen (1935) described the female and remarked the difference to other species because it has three silver spots on the forewing: one spot closer to the posterior margin, other above the first, and one close to the discal cell. The author also commented that this specimen was donated to MACN. In the original description there is a black and white photo of the holotype with the legend Hypothaema caroli (sic) (Jörgensen 1935).</p><p>Premolis eugenia Jörgensen, 1935: 111 (Fig. 5)</p><p>Current identity. Demolis albicostata Hampson, 1901</p><p>Type Material. Holotype and undisclosed number of paratypes.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Female paratype with the following labels: “#32794” (old catalogue number); [Paraguay, Departamento de Guairá, Villarrica] (information from original description only); “ Premolis eugenia Jorg [ensen]. Mus[eo]. Nac[ional]. Hist[oria]. Natural Buenos Aires”; “Typus”; “ PARATYPUS ”; [♀]; “MACN-En 32217” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. The paratype is in bad condition because the left forewing and the left antenna are lost and the right hind wing has a small circular hole .</p><p>Remarks. Premolis eugenia Jörgensen is currently a synonym; Vincent &amp; Laguerre (2013) synonymized it. Jörgensen (1935) mentioned that one paratype was donated to MACN. This author mentioned that this species is close to Premolis (sic) flavithorax Rothschild, 1909 .</p><p>Cissura bilineata Orfila, 1935: 226</p><p>Current identity. Cissura bilineata Orfila, 1935</p><p>Type Material. Female holotype. Material possible lost or destroyed.</p><p>Type locality and label information. [#254] (old catalogue number); [Paraguay, Departamento de Guairá, Villarrica]; [Holotypus]; [♀] (information from original description only).</p><p>MACN. The holotype female was not found in MACN.</p><p>Remarks. In the original description Orfila (1935) commented that this species is close to Cissura decora Walker, 1854 and Cissura plumbea Hampson, 1901 except the crimson coxa, the subcoastal band, which reaches the margin of the forewing, and the marginal band, which reaches the outer margin. Orfila (1935) did not provide a photograph or illustration of the habitus.</p><p>Lepidojulia arnaui Orfila, 1952: 300 (Fig. 6)</p><p>Current identity. Lepidojulia arnaui Orfila, 1952</p><p>Type Material. Described based on one female holotype.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Female holotype with the following labels: “S[an]. Pedro de Colalao, Dto. [Department] Trancas-Tucumán [province of], [Argentina], I-[19]51, [leg. by R. P. José] Arnau”; “ HOLOTY- PUS”; “Genitales [genitalia] p.m. 208, patas [legs] p.m. 209, Holotypus, ilegible letter [possible signature] 1952”; “ Lepidojulia arnaui sp. nov. Holotypus ♀, illegible letter [possible signature], det[ermined] 1952”; “MACN-En 32215” (new catalogue number of Aurora). Female paratype with the following labels: “ ARGENTINA, [province of] Tucumán, D[epartment]º. Tafí, Garabatal, I-[1]934, P. Köhler leg.”; “ PARATYPUS ”, “ Lepidojulia arnaui sp. nov. Paratipo ♀, illegible letter [possible signature]”; “Alas derechas p.m. 210, Antena p.m. 211, Paratypus, illegible letter [possible signature]”; “MACN-En 32216” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. Holotype missing the last three abdominal segments because abdomen was dissected and prepared. Also, pro-, meso- and meta- legs were dissected.</p><p>Remarks. The genital and legs preparation made by Orfila (1952) were found in the Orfila collection. The male is unknown and the material of this species is very scarce at all Argentinian collections (Beccacece pers. com.). There are another two females paratypes deposited in the collection of Instituto Fundación Miguel Lillo, Tucumán, and one female paratype deposited in Natural History Museum, London. Lepidojulia arnaui is the type species of this monotypic genus (Vincent &amp; Laguerre 2014). The coloration pattern suggests that L. arnaui is possibly associated with the complex Pseudohemihyalea ambigua (Strecker, 1878) . Further studies and new samples at the type locality or vicinity are necessary to find males and to confirm the validity of the genus with morphology and molecular analyses.</p><p>Amastus ninae Orfila, 1959: 67 (Fig. 7)</p><p>Current identity. Leucanopsis ninae (Orfila, 1959)</p><p>Type Material. Male holotype and one male paratype.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Male holotype with the following labels: “[Argentina, Buenos Aires], Villa Gesell, 16.1.[19]56”; “ HOLOTYPUS ”; “ ♂ ”; “MACN-En 32209” (new catalogue number of Aurora). Male paratype with the following labels: “[Argentina, Buenos Aires], Villa Gesell; 11.2.[19]56”; “ PARATYPUS ”; “ ♂ ”; “MACN-En 32210” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. Holotype in a very good condition. The abdomen of the paratype has been dissected by Orfila (1959).</p><p>Remarks. A taxonomical rearrangement for this species to Leucanopsis Rego Barros, 1956 has been proposed by Beccacece et al. (2018). The dissection made by Orfila (1959) was not found in the MACN.</p><p>Bertholdia zoenia Beccacece, 2017</p><p>Current identity. Bertholdia zoenia Beccacece, 2017</p><p>Type Material. Holotype deposited at Museo de Zoología de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba [MZUC] in a very good condition. Seven males and three females paratypes (two paratypes in MACN).</p><p>Type locality and label information. Male holotype with the following labels: Argentina, Misiones, Parque Provincial Esmeralda, 505 m, 18–I–2012, S 26°53’39’’ W 53°52’44’’, H. Beccacece, A. Zapata, G. San Blas, E. Drewniak &amp; N. Villafañe leg. [MZUC]. Paratypes deposited at MACN: male paratype with the following labels: Argentina, Misiones, D [epartamento]. Candelaria, L. N. Alem, XI–[19]53, Gaitopulo leg. (dissected, prep. ARC 00009- MACN); male paratype with the following labels: Argentina, Misiones, Dep. Concepción – Sta. María, I–[1]953, M. J. Viana leg. (dissected, prep. number: ARC 00010- MACN) .</p><p>MACN. Both male paratypes were dissected and abdomen removed (Beccacece 2017) .</p><p>Remarks. This species can be recognized from other species of the genus because the outer margin of the hyaline spot is smooth and regular. The photos of the holotype, genitalia and also particular characteristics of this species are available in the original description (Beccacece 2017).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F0BE50FFC5FF9EFF4AF8E8BD7DC0A2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rodriguez-Ramirez, Joanna;Beccacece, Hernan Mario;Pinheiro, Lívia Rodrigues;Grados, Juan;Morono-Brizuela, Maria Lucila	Rodriguez-Ramirez, Joanna, Beccacece, Hernan Mario, Pinheiro, Lívia Rodrigues, Grados, Juan, Morono-Brizuela, Maria Lucila (2020): Type material of Arctiinae (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) in the collection of the Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia (Buenos Aires Argentina). Zootaxa 4742 (3): 442-466, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4742.3.2
03F0BE50FFC8FF9FFF4AFB30BA32C5A9.text	03F0BE50FFC8FF9FFF4AFB30BA32C5A9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arctiini Leach 1815	<div><p>Arctiinae, Arctiini, Pericopina</p><p>Pericopis principalis Jörgensen, 1935: 119</p><p>Current identity. Dysschema boisduvallii (van der Hoeven, 1840) . Synonymized by Becker (2013).</p><p>Type Material. Undisclosed number of female paratypes. Holotype lost.</p><p>Type locality and label information. [Paraguay, Trinidad] (information of localities from original description only) .</p><p>MACN. No paratypes were found .</p><p>Remarks. Jörgensen (1935) said: “…(Como el ejemplar típico ha desaparecido, la descripción anterior incompleta está hecha según la acuarela del señor Schade). […(Since the typical specimen has disappeared, the previous incomplete description is made following Mister Schade′s watercolor painting)…]. This confirms that the descrip- tion of this species was made using only a painting and the type specimen does not exist. The synonymy proposed by Becker (2013) has been confirmed by Vincent &amp; Laguerre (2014) and Lamas (2017).</p><p>Pericopis regalis Jörgensen, 1935: 117 (Fig. 8)</p><p>Current identity. Dysschema boisduvallii (van der Hoeven, 1840) . Synonymized by Becker (2013).</p><p>Type Material. Female holotype.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Female holotype with the following labels: “#32796” (old catalogue number); “ Argentina, Formosa, [Guaycolé], 23.12.191 9, [leg.] P. Jörgensen”; “Typus”; “ HOLOTYPUS ”; [♀]; “ Pericopis regalis Jorg [ensen]. Mus[eo]. Nac[ional]. Hist[oria]. Natural Buenos Aires”; “MACN-En 32235” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. The holotype is in very good condition, in similar condition as the black and white photo of the original description .</p><p>Remarks. Jörgensen (1935) discusses that this species is similar to Daritis trapeziata Walker, [1865] . Becker (2013) currently synonymized both species into Dysschema boisduvallii (van der Hoeven, 1840) and following authors confirm the synonymy proposed (Vincent &amp; Laguerre 2014; Lamas 2017).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F0BE50FFC8FF9FFF4AFB30BA32C5A9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rodriguez-Ramirez, Joanna;Beccacece, Hernan Mario;Pinheiro, Lívia Rodrigues;Grados, Juan;Morono-Brizuela, Maria Lucila	Rodriguez-Ramirez, Joanna, Beccacece, Hernan Mario, Pinheiro, Lívia Rodrigues, Grados, Juan, Morono-Brizuela, Maria Lucila (2020): Type material of Arctiinae (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) in the collection of the Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia (Buenos Aires Argentina). Zootaxa 4742 (3): 442-466, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4742.3.2
03F0BE50FFC9FF87FF4AF85FBC1CC3E4.text	03F0BE50FFC9FF87FF4AF85FBC1CC3E4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arctiini Leach 1815	<div><p>Arctiinae, Arctiini, Ctenuchina and Euchromiina</p><p>Charidea obsoleta Burmeister, 1878: 516</p><p>Current identity. Episcepsis obsoleta (Burmeister, 1878)</p><p>Type Material. Type material possibly lost or destroyed.</p><p>Type locality and label information. [Argentina] There is no information about type locality nor type specimen in the original description (Burmeister 1878) .</p><p>MACN. The type material of this species was not found in MACN.</p><p>Remarks. Burmeister (1878) did not mention where the material was deposited, he only mentioned habitus and color pattern. Interestingly, Hampson (1898) provides a drawing of the species, with the analysis of two males and one female and he even mentions the collector (Leech). There are two specimens corresponding to this collector in the collection of the National History Museum United Kingdom, with old labels corresponding to Hampson time. These specimens studied by Hampson are very likely not from the original description as there is no mention of the collector in the Burmeister’s description.</p><p>Charidea rubricincta Burmeister, 1878: 386 (Fig. 9)</p><p>Current identity. Euclera rubricincta (Burmeister, 1878)</p><p>Type Material. Undisclosed number of syntypes.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Male lectotype with the following labels: “[Argentina], Buen[os]. Ay[i]res.”; “ rubricincta Burm [eister].”; [♂]; “MACN-En 32740” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. One male syntype in very good condition .</p><p>Remarks. The only specimen found matches with the type locality and habitus of the species. The kind of label of the locality is the one that Burmeister frequently used. Gerardo Lamas previously labeled this specimen as holotype: “ HOLOTYPE, Charidea rubricincta Burmeister, 1878, G[erardo]. LAMAS det[ermined]. 2004”. However, there is no mention of the number of specimens examined. For this reason, we did not consider this specimen as holotype and proposed hereby to designate the male specimen as lectotype in [MACN] with a red label with the inscription: “ Lectotype ♂ Charidea rubricincta Burmeister designated by Beccacece &amp; Rodríguez-Ramírez”.</p><p>Eurata frigida Burmeister, 1878: 516 (Fig. 10)</p><p>Current identity. Clystea frigida (Burmeister, 1878)</p><p>Type Material. Undisclosed number of syntypes.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Male lectotype with the following labels: “Typus”, “ ARGENTINA, Environs, B[ueno]S. AIRES ”; “44858” (old catalogue number); “Col[lection]. Ruschew[eyh].”; “MACN-En 32193” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. A male syntype in moderate condition because it does not have the right antenna .</p><p>Remarks. This species was changed to different genus and now is included into Clystea Watson, 1980 . Here, we propose to designate the male specimen found as lectotype in [MACN] with a red label with the inscription “ Lectotype ♂ Eurata frigida Burmeister designated by Beccacece &amp; Rodríguez-Ramírez”.</p><p>Eurata hermione Burmeister, 1878: 380 (Fig. 11)</p><p>Current identity. Eurata hermione Burmeister, 1878</p><p>Type Material. Undisclosed number of syntypes.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Male lectotype with the following labels: “[Argentina], Mendoza ”; “ Hermione Burm[eister]. R [epública]. A[rgentina].”; “MACN-En 33087” (new catalogue number of Aurora). Male paralectotype with the following labels: “[Argentina], Mendoza ”; “MACN-En 33088” (new catalogue number of Aurora). Female paralectotype with the following labels: “[Argentina, Entre Ríos], Paraná”; “MACN-En 33089” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. Two males from Mendoza in good condition with the distal part of antennae broken. One female from Paraná [Entre Ríos, Argentina] in bad condition, the antennae are missing and the abdomen is broken .</p><p>Remarks. Burmeister (1878) in the original description did not comment on the number of specimens. For this reason, we propose hereby to designate the male specimen from Mendoza (see Fig. 11) as lectotype in [MACN] with a red label with the inscription “ Lectotype ♂ Eurata hermione Burmeister designated by Beccacece &amp; Rodríguez- Ramírez”.</p><p>Eurata igniventris Burmeister, 1878: 378 (Fig. 12)</p><p>Current identity. Eurata igniventris Burmeister, 1878 Type Material. Holotype without indication of sex in the original description.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Male holotype with the following labels: “ ARGENTINA, CORDOBA ”; “#44978” (old catalogue number); “ HOLOTYPUS ”; “Col[lection]. Antigua”; “MACN-En 34203” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. The male holotype is housed at MACN. The specimen is in moderate to bad condition because the apex of the left forewing is missing and the antennae are broken.</p><p>Remarks. The holotype was found in the Orfila collection. This author made a review of Eurata Herrich- Schäffer, [1853] and moved this specimen to his collection (Orfila 1931). The labels and characteristics of the specimen confirm that it is the holotype.</p><p>Eurata patagiata Burmeister, 1878: 379 (Fig. 13)</p><p>Current identity. Eurata patagiata Burmeister, 1878</p><p>Type Material. Undisclosed number of syntypes from [province of Entre Ríos], Paraná and [province of] Córdoba, Argentina.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Male specimen with the following labels: “[Argentina, Entre Ríos, Departamento de Paraná], Paraná”; “ patagiata Burm [eister]. R [epública]. A[rgentina].”; “MACN-En 33090” (new catalogue number of Aurora) .</p><p>MACN. The only syntype found is in bad condition, without antennae and the left forewing is discolored and apex broken .</p><p>Remarks. There was another specimen in the drawer near to the only syntype found, however this specimen does not bear labels except a small flag of Argentina. The male specimen from Paraná (see Fig. 13) is designated as the lectotype in [MACN] with a red label with the inscription “ Lectotype ♂ Eurata patagiata Burmeister designated by Beccacece &amp; Rodríguez-Ramírez”. According to Orfila (1931) there were two types in MACN.</p><p>Glaucopis myrrhine Burmeister, 1878: 375 (Fig. 14)</p><p>Current identity. Pseudohyaleucerea vulnerata (Butler, 1875)</p><p>Type Material. Holotype from Buenos Aires, Argentina, without indication of sex in the original description.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Male specimen with the following labels: “Typus”; “[Argentina], Buenos Aires ”; “ Myrrhine Burm[eister]. Rep[ública]. Arg[entina].”; [leg. Ed. Aguirre] (information from original description only); “ HOLOTYPUS ”; “MACN-En 33190” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. The holotype is in bad condition because the wings are discolored and the outer margin of the right forewing is broken .</p><p>Remarks. The holotype is a male and the present senior synonymy is correct for us. Gerardo Lamas also determined this species as holotype and labeled: “ HOLOTYPE, Glaucopis myrrhine Burmeister, 1878, G[erardo] LAMAS det[ermined]. 2004”</p><p>Pseudosphex polybioides Burmeister, 1878: 372 (Fig. 15)</p><p>Current identity. Myrmecopsis polybioides (Burmeister, 1878)</p><p>Type Material. Holotype without indication of sex in the original description.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Male specimen with the following labels: “[Argentina], [Buenos Aires], [Baradero], [leg. Lynch, Félix]” (information from original description only); “ Pseudosphex Hubn [er].”; “ polybioides Burm [eister]. Rep[ública]. Arg[entina].”; “ HOLOTYPUS ”; “MACN-En 33086” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. The male holotype is housed at MACN. The type specimen does not have the left antenna.</p><p>Remarks. The holotype was collected in northern Buenos Aires, Argentina, more specifically Santiago de Baradero. The holotype is not labeled with information of locality but it has a main label with the specific name and matches with Burmeister’s labels format (Beccacece et al. 2014). Previously, Gerardo Lamas also determined this species as holotype and labeled: “ HOLOTYPE, Pseudosphex polybioides Burmeister, 1878 G[erardo]. LAMAS det[ermined]. 2004”</p><p>Charidea pretiosa Burmeister, 1880: 59 (Fig. 16)</p><p>Current identity. Cyanopepla pretiosa (Burmeister, 1880)</p><p>Type Material. Undisclosed number of syntypes.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Male specimen with the following labels: “[Argentina], Tucumán ”; “ preciosa Burm[eister]. Rep[ública]. Arg[entina].”; “MACN-En 32741” (new catalogue number of Aurora) .</p><p>MACN. One male is in good condition and matches with the original description.</p><p>Remarks. Gerardo Lamas previously labeled this specimen as holotype: “ HOLOTYPE, Charidea pretiosa Burmeister, 1880, G[erardo] LAMAS det[ermined]. 2004”. However, there is no mention of the number of specimens examined. For this reason, we propose hereby to designate the male specimen as the lectotype in [MACN] with a red label with the inscription “ Lectotype ♂ Charidea pretiosa Burmeister designated by Beccacece &amp; Rodríguez- Ramírez”. This species is similar to Cyanopepla hurama (Butler, 1876) described from Ecuador and Cyanopepla subgloriosa (Staudinger, 1894) .</p><p>Glaucopis leucostalacta Burmeister, 1880: 59 (Fig. 17)</p><p>Current identity. Homoeocera acuminata (Walker, 1856)</p><p>Type Material. Undisclosed number of syntypes.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Male specimen with the following labels: “[Argentina], Prov[incia]. B[ueno]s. A[ire]s.”; “ leucosticta Burm[eister]., Buen[os]. Air[es].”; “MACN-En 33091” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. A male syntype in good condition, the distal part of antennae are lost .</p><p>Remarks. Gerardo Lamas previously labeled this specimen as holotype: “ HOLOTYPE, Glaucopis leucostalacta Burmeister, 1880 G[erardo]. LAMAS det[ermined]. 2004”. However, in the original description Burmeister (1880) did not mention the sex of the specimen nor the number of specimens observed, only that the species was donated by M. Henri Lynch. For this reason, wehereby designate the male specimen from Buenos Aires (see Fig. 17) as lectotype in [MACN] with a red label with the inscription “ Lectotype ♂ Glaucopis leucostalacta Burmeister designated by Beccacece &amp; Rodríguez-Ramírez”.</p><p>Halysidota mundula Berg, 1882: 216</p><p>Current identity. Gloora mundula (Berg, 1882)</p><p>Type Material. Female holotype. Type material possibly lost or destroyed.</p><p>Type locality and label information. [Argentina, Corrientes, 1876] (information of localities from original description only) .</p><p>MACN. The type material of this species was not found in MACN.</p><p>Remarks. Recently Grados et al. (2018) included this species into Gloora Boppré, 2018 . This genus includes several Agylla -like species.</p><p>Psoloptera meisteri Berg, 1882: 153 (Fig. 18)</p><p>Current identity. Rhynchopyga meisteri (Berg, 1882)</p><p>Type Material. Holotype described on the basis of specimen collected by Father D. F. Meistere in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and paratype donated to MACN.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Female holotype with the following labels: “ Psoloptera Meisteri (sic), [Argentina] B[uenos]. Aires, Berg [18]83; “ ♀ ”; “ HOLOTYPUS ”; “MACN-En 34201” (new catalogue number of Aurora). Male paratype with the following labels: “[Uruguay], Banda oriental ”; “Typus”; “ ♂ ”; “ Psoloptera Butl. 1815 ”; “ Meisteri Berg . R [epública]. A[rgentina]., [col. Margarita, de Windmüller]; “ PARATYPUS ”; “MACN-En 34202” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. One female holotype in bad condition without the head, left forewing and left hind wing. One male paratype with broken antennae .</p><p>Remarks. The holotype is deposited in Burmeister’s collection. A third specimen was found, but given that it was not mentioned in the original description, it cannot be part of the type series.</p><p>Eurota (sic) cosquinensis Giacomelli, 1928: 679.</p><p>Current identity. Leucotmemis pleuraemata paranensis Schrottky, 1910</p><p>Type Material. Description based on a single specimen. Type material possibly lost or destroyed.</p><p>Type locality and label information. [Argentina, Córdoba, Cosquín, Calle Rioja] (information of localities from original description only) .</p><p>MACN. The type material of this species was not found in MACN.</p><p>Remarks. Giacomelli (1928) did not mention where the type material was deposited. Orfila (1931) proposed for this species the corresponding synonymy with Leucotmemis pleuraemata paranensis Schrottky, 1910 .</p><p>Eurota (sic) julia Orfila, 1931a: 196 (Fig. 19), syn. n.</p><p>Current identity. Eurata hermione Burmeister, 1878</p><p>Type Material. One male holotype, four female paratypes and one male paratype.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Male holotype with the following labels: “116” (old catalogue number); “[Argentina], Córdoba, Cosquín, [leg. E.] Giacomelli”; “Holotipo”; “ Eurota julia = Eurota hermione polonia mihi, det[ermined]. [R.] Orfila”; “ HOLOTYPUS ”; “MACN-En 33537” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. The male holotype is in moderate condition without left antenna .</p><p>Remarks. The male holotype was deposited in the Collection Orfila. The other paratypes were not found in MACN. The habitus of this species corresponds exactly to that of E. hermione . For this reason, we hereby propose the following synonymy:</p><p>Eurata hermione Burmeister, 1878 = Eurota julia Orfila, 1931 syn. n.</p><p>Eurota (sic) strigiventris famatina Orfila, 1931b: 311 (Fig. 20)</p><p>Current identity. Eurata strigiventris famatina (Orfila, 1931)</p><p>Type Material. Male holotype and female paratype.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Male holotype with the following labels: “[Argentina, La Rioja, Departamento Famatina], Trapiche Durazno, N[e]v[a]do. de Famatina [Cerro General Belgrano], 1.600 -1.800 m, 1- 3.en[ero].1931”; “ Eurota strigiventris famatina mihi [R.] Orfila Det[ermined].”; “ HOLOTYPUS ”; “MACN-En 32194” (new catalogue number of Aurora). Female paratype with the following labels: “[Argentina, La Rioja, Departamento Famatina], Trapiche Durazno, N[e]v[a]do. de Famatina [Cerro General Belgrano], 1600–1800 m.; 1- 3.ene[ro].1931”; “ Eurota strigiventris famatina Orfila Det [ermined].”; “ALOTYPUS”; “ PARATYPUS ”; “MACN- En 32195” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. Holotype in good condition exhibits all its body parts. The paratype is in bad condition without antennae and discolored.</p><p>Remarks. There are 12 paratypes in the Breyer collection (Orfila, 1931b), which is housed in the Museo La Plata (MLP).</p><p>Eurota (sic) strigiventris tucumana Orfila, 1931b: 312 (Fig. 21)</p><p>Current identity. Eurata strigiventris tucumana (Orfila, 1931)</p><p>Type Material. Male holotype.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Male specimen with the following labels: “ Tucumán, [Argentina], [leg. E. Giacomelli]”; “ Eurota strigiventris tucumana mihi, Orfila Det[ermined]”; “ HOLOTYPUS ”; “MACN-En 32196” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. The holotype is in moderate condition, but the left antenna is broken .</p><p>Remarks. Orfila (1931b) mentioned that the type specimen was deposited in the Orfila collection, and that the specimen was donated by E. Giacomelli.</p><p>Loxophlebia barberoi Jörgensen, 1935: 100 (Fig. 22)</p><p>Current identity. Loxophlebia barberoi Jörgensen, 1935</p><p>Type Material. Male holotype.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Male specimen with the following labels: “12”; “#32706” (old catalogue number); [Paraguay, Departamento de Guairá, Villarrica], [VI-1935] (information of localities from original description only); “Typus”; “ Loxophlebia barberoi Jorg [ensen]. Mus[eo]. Nac[ional]. Hist[oria]. Natural Buenos Aires”; “ HOLOTYPUS ”; “MACN-En 32197” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. The holotype is discolored and without the right antenna .</p><p>Remarks. The author confirms the donation of the holotype to the MACN in the original description.</p><p>Loxophlebia ducalis Jörgensen, 1935: 101 (Fig. 23)</p><p>Current identity. Loxophlebia ducalis Jörgensen, 1935</p><p>Type Material. Male holotype.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Male specimen with the following labels: “#32708” (old catalogue number); [Paraguay, Departamento de Guairá, Villarrica, VII-1935] (information of localities from original description only); “ Typus ”; “Loxoplebia ducalis Jorg [ensen]. Mus[eo]. Nac[ional]. Hist[oria]. Natural Buenos Aires”; “ HOLO- TYPUS ”; “MACN-En 32198” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. The holotype is in bad condition, it does not have antennae, and scales are missing on the thorax .</p><p>Remarks. In the original description Jörgensen (1935) comments that the holotype was donated to MACN.</p><p>Loxophlebia schrollei Jörgensen, 1935: 101 (Fig. 24)</p><p>Current identity. Loxophlebia schrollei Jörgensen, 1935</p><p>Type Material. Male holotype.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Male specimen with the following labels: “13”; “#32707” (old catalogue number); [Paraguay, Departamento de Guairá, Villarrica] (information of localities from original description only); “ Typus ”; “ Loxophlebia schrollei Jorg [ensen]. Mus[eo]. Nac[ional]. Hist[oria]. Natural Buenos Aires”; “ HOLOTY- PUS”; “MACN-En 32199” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. The holotype is in bad condition, the left forewing, hind wing and antenna are missing .</p><p>Remarks. In the original description the holotype was donated to MACN by the author. The species is very similar to Loxophlebia diaphana (Sepp, 1848) .</p><p>Mesolasia splendens Jörgensen, 1935: 102 (Fig. 25)</p><p>Current identity. Aethria splendens (Jörgensen, 1935)</p><p>Type Material. Male holotype.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Male specimen with the following labels: “#32711” (old catalogue number); [Paraguay, Departamento de Guairá, Villarrica] (information of localities from original description only); “Typus”; “ Mesolasia splendens Jorg [ensen]. Mus[eo]. Nac[ional]. Hist[oria]. Natural Buenos Aires”; “ HOLOTYPUS ”; “MACN-En 32200” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. The holotype is in bad condition, the left forewing, right forewing, left hind wing and the right antenna are broken .</p><p>Remarks. The holotype was donated by the author. The specimen found at MACN matches with the figures and the information present in the original description. This species is very similar to Clystea frigida (Burmeister, 1878), except for the black border of the wings, which is larger. However, to make a nomenclatural change of these species, it is first necessary to review both Aethria Hübner, [1819] and Clystea Watson, 1980 .</p><p>Phoenicoprocta schreiteri Jörgensen, 1935: 100 (Fig. 26)</p><p>Current identity. Phoenicoprocta schreiteri Jörgensen, 1935</p><p>Type Material. Holotype male and undisclosed number of paratypes.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Male specimen with the following labels: “#32705”; “11” (old catalogue number); [Paraguay, Departamento de Guairá, Villarrica] (information of localities from original description only); “ Phoenicoprocta schreiteri Jorg [ensen]. Mus[eo]. Nac[ional]. Hist[oria]. Natural Buenos Aires”; “ Typus ”; “ PARA- TYPUS ”; “MACN-En 32201” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. A male paratype was found, the metallic green and blue scales are completely lost, the inner margin of the left hind wing is broken, and the abdomen is broken also at distal part .</p><p>Remarks. The author confirms the donation of one paratype with the old MACN catalogue number which corresponds to the label on the male specimen found. In the original description Jörgensen (1935) did not mention where the holotype was deposited.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F0BE50FFC9FF87FF4AF85FBC1CC3E4	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rodriguez-Ramirez, Joanna;Beccacece, Hernan Mario;Pinheiro, Lívia Rodrigues;Grados, Juan;Morono-Brizuela, Maria Lucila	Rodriguez-Ramirez, Joanna, Beccacece, Hernan Mario, Pinheiro, Lívia Rodrigues, Grados, Juan, Morono-Brizuela, Maria Lucila (2020): Type material of Arctiinae (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) in the collection of the Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia (Buenos Aires Argentina). Zootaxa 4742 (3): 442-466, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4742.3.2
03F0BE50FFD2FF82FF4AFF5FBCD0C3FE.text	03F0BE50FFD2FF82FF4AFF5FBCD0C3FE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arctiinae Lithosiini	<div><p>Arctiinae, Lithosiini</p><p>Cisthene bisigna Berg, 1875: 75 .</p><p>Current identity. Cisthene bisigna Berg, 1875</p><p>Type Material. Male holotype. Type material possibly lost or destroyed.</p><p>Type locality and label information. [Argentina, BuenosAires, Muro del fuerte del Carm[en].[de] Patag[ones]].; [Typus]; [6.XII.1874]; [col. Berg]. (Information of locality from original description only).</p><p>MACN. The type material of this species was not found in MACN.</p><p>Remarks. The holotype was not found. The female of this species was painted in the catalogue of Hampson (1914: plate XXXV, fig. 28), and the habitus matches with the description of the male holotype.</p><p>Cydosia luridipennis Burmeister, 1878: 423 .</p><p>Current identity. Progona luridipennis (Burmeister, 1878)</p><p>Type Material. Undisclosed number of syntypes. Type material possibly lost or destroyed.</p><p>Type locality and label information. [Córdova, Argentina] (information of locality from original description only) .</p><p>MACN. The type material of this species was not found in MACN.</p><p>Remarks. Burmeister (1878) commented that the type specimens were from Córdov[b]a and obtained by M. Berg. The habitus of a male was painted in the catalogue of Hampson (1914: plate XXVI, fig. 16).</p><p>Hypocrita flaviceps Burmeister, 1878: 425 .</p><p>Current identity. Eucyclopera flaviceps (Burmeister, 1878)</p><p>Type Material. Undisclosed number of syntypes. Material possible lost or destroyed.</p><p>Type locality and labels information. [Argentina, Buenos Aires] (information of locality from original description only) .</p><p>MACN. The males syntypes were not found at MACN.</p><p>Remarks. A syntype was illustrated separately from the original description by the author (Burmeister 1880: Atlas, XVII, Fig. 16). The species is not rare in Buenos Aires (Burmeister 1878).</p><p>Hypocrita calochroma Snellen, 1878: 391 (Fig. 27)</p><p>Current identity. Cisthene calochroma (Snellen, 1878)</p><p>Type Material. Three male syntypes.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Label of the possible syntypes: “[Argentina], Buenos Aires ”; “ Hypocrita Hb. 1816 H.S. ”; “ calochroma Snell [en]. R [epública]. A[rgentina].”; “ SYNTYPE ”; “MACN-En 33536” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. Two possible syntypes were found at MACN.</p><p>Remarks. We cannot confirm if these two specimens are two of the three syntypes used by Snellen (1878) in the original description. Snellen (1878) only commented that this species is common in Córdov[b]a, [Argentina], but he did not mention if all syntypes are from the same type locality. Hampson (1900) commented that one male type is deposited in Collection Snellen.</p><p>Bulbura (sic) dorsisigna freseni Jörgensen, 1935: 103 .</p><p>Current identity. Balbura fresini (Jörgensen, 1935)</p><p>Type Material. Male holotype. Material possible lost or destroyed.</p><p>Type locality and label information. [Paraguay, San Bernardino], [♂], [diciembre, 1935] (information of lo- cality from original description only) .</p><p>MACN. The type material of this species was not found in MACN.</p><p>Remarks. Jörgensen (1935) commented that the specimen flew in December after emerging from the pupa. For this reason, we presumably consider that the specimen was observed, but not collected. The specimen is similar to the typical form but the color of the head and patagia are different. As there is no genus of Lepidoptera named Bulbura, we considered it as a misspelled name.</p><p>Odozana incarnata Jörgensen, 1935: 102 .</p><p>Current identity. Odozana incarnata Jörgensen, 1935</p><p>Type Material. Undisclosed number of female syntypes, possibly lost or destroyed.</p><p>Type locality and label information. [Paraguay, Villarrica], [♀], [marzo] (information of locality and sex from original description only) .</p><p>MACN. The syntypes were not found at MACN.</p><p>Remarks. Jörgensen (1935) did not mention where the type material was deposited. This species is very similar to Odozana patagiata Dognin, 1909 from Bolivia (Jörgensen 1935). The latter was painted in the catalogue of Hampson (1914: plate XXXV, figure 4).</p><p>Cisthene australis Orfila, 1935: 225 (Fig. 28)</p><p>Current identity. Vianania australis (Orfila, 1935)</p><p>Type Material. Male holotype and a female allotypus (paratype).</p><p>Type locality and label information: Male holotype with the following labels: “Sierras de Tandil, [Provincia de] Buenos Aires, [República] Argentina, 7-XII-[1]930; A. Breyer leg[acy].”; “ HOLOTYPUS ”; “ Eudesmia australis n[ew]. sp[ecies]., DET[ermined]. ORFILA; “ Vianania australis ♂ Holotypus Orfila”; “MACN-En 32204” (new catalogue number of Aurora). Female paratype with the following labels: “Sierras de Tandil, [Provincia de] Buenos Aires, [República] Argentina, 7-XII-[1]930, Alb. Breyer leg[acy].”; “ ALLOTYPUS ”; “ Eudesmia australis n[ew]. sp[ecies]., DET[ermined]. ORFILA”; “ PARATYPUS ”; “ Vianania australis ♀ Allotypus Orfila ”; “MACN- En 32205” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. The holotype is in moderate to bad condition because the antennae and abdomen were dissected. Paratype in similar condition to that of holotype.</p><p>Remarks. There are other eight paratypes deposited in the Museo La Plata. All preparations made by Orfila were found at MACN.</p><p>Cisthene boliviana Forster, 1942: 41 (Fig. 29)</p><p>Current identity. Eucyclopera boliviana (Forster, 1942)</p><p>Type Material. Male paratype.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Male paratype with the following labels: “Zoolog[ische]. Staatss[amm]l[un]g, BOLIVIA, [Province Sud] Yungas, [Department La Paz], Chulumani, 1500-2000 m [eters], leg[acy]. Schulze”; “Genitales p[reparation]. m. n[umber] 673”; “ PARATYPUS ”; “Para-typus ♂, Cisthene boliviana Forst [er]., W. Forster München”; “MACN-En 33534” (new catalogue number of Aurora).</p><p>MACN. A male paratype was found in bad condition without left antenna and abdomen .</p><p>Remarks. Surely, Orfila (1954) used this specimen to compare it and describe with the type specimen of Vianania aymara Orfila, 1954 . The preparation made by Orfila was found at MACN. The habitus of this species is very similar to the habitus of some species included in Cisthene Walker, 1854 and Vianania Orfila, 1954 . It is necessary to review these two genera and Eucyclopera Hampson, 1895 .</p><p>Vianania aymara Orfila, 1954: 485 (Fig. 30)</p><p>Current identity. Vianania aymara Orfila, 1954</p><p>Type Material. Male holotype and male paratype.</p><p>Type locality and label information. Male holotype with the following labels: “ HOLOTYPUS ”; “Coll[ection]. ORFILA”, Bolivia, Cochabamba, 2600 m., Zischka [leg.], 8-I-[19]49”; [♂]; “MACN-En 33535” (new catalogue number of Aurora). Male paratype with the following labels: [Paratypus], [♂], [Bolivia, Sara] (information of locali- ties from original description only).</p><p>MACN. The holotype is in bad condition and the paratype was not found in MACN.</p><p>Remarks. Orfila (1954) mentioned that type materials were deposited in his own collection. Surely, Orfila used the Forster’s specimen to compare it and describe with the type specimen of Vianania aymara Orfila, 1954 . The preparations made by Orfila were found at MACN.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F0BE50FFD2FF82FF4AFF5FBCD0C3FE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rodriguez-Ramirez, Joanna;Beccacece, Hernan Mario;Pinheiro, Lívia Rodrigues;Grados, Juan;Morono-Brizuela, Maria Lucila	Rodriguez-Ramirez, Joanna, Beccacece, Hernan Mario, Pinheiro, Lívia Rodrigues, Grados, Juan, Morono-Brizuela, Maria Lucila (2020): Type material of Arctiinae (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) in the collection of the Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia (Buenos Aires Argentina). Zootaxa 4742 (3): 442-466, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4742.3.2
