taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03FA87827C276B68E2682E4CFBF5F835.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5421036/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5421036	Fig. 1. Monthly variation of mean gonadosomatic index (GSI) for Brachyhypopomus draco males (above) and females (below) from September 2003 to August 2004. Vertical bars represent the standard deviation and the values between the brackets are the sample size.	Fig. 1. Monthly variation of mean gonadosomatic index (GSI) for Brachyhypopomus draco males (above) and females (below) from September 2003 to August 2004. Vertical bars represent the standard deviation and the values between the brackets are the sample size.	2009-12-31	Schaan, Andrea B.;Giora, Júlia;Fialho, Clarice B.		Zenodo	biologists	Schaan, Andrea B.;Giora, Júlia;Fialho, Clarice B.			
03FA87827C276B68E2682E4CFBF5F835.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15224258/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15224258	Fig. 2. Monthly variation of mean repletion index (RI) for Brachyhypopomus draco males (above) and females (below) from September 2003 to August 2004. Vertical bars represent the standard deviation and the values between the brackets are the sample size.	Fig. 2. Monthly variation of mean repletion index (RI) for Brachyhypopomus draco males (above) and females (below) from September 2003 to August 2004. Vertical bars represent the standard deviation and the values between the brackets are the sample size.	2009-12-31	Schaan, Andrea B.;Giora, Júlia;Fialho, Clarice B.		Zenodo	biologists	Schaan, Andrea B.;Giora, Júlia;Fialho, Clarice B.			
03FA87827C276B68E2682E4CFBF5F835.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5421038/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5421038	Fig. 3. Monthly variation of mean hepatosomatic index (HSI) for Brachyhypopomus draco males (above) and females (below) from September 2003 to August 2004. Vertical bars represent the standard deviation and the values between the brackets are the sample size.	Fig. 3. Monthly variation of mean hepatosomatic index (HSI) for Brachyhypopomus draco males (above) and females (below) from September 2003 to August 2004. Vertical bars represent the standard deviation and the values between the brackets are the sample size.	2009-12-31	Schaan, Andrea B.;Giora, Júlia;Fialho, Clarice B.		Zenodo	biologists	Schaan, Andrea B.;Giora, Júlia;Fialho, Clarice B.			
03FA87827C276B68E2682E4CFBF5F835.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5421040/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5421040	Fig. 4. Monthly variation of light photoperiod (min) (above); water temperature (ºC), depth (cm) and oxygen saturation (%) (middle); conductivity (µS/cm) and rainfall (mm) (below). Values in lagoa Verde from September 2003 to August 2004.	Fig. 4. Monthly variation of light photoperiod (min) (above); water temperature (ºC), depth (cm) and oxygen saturation (%) (middle); conductivity (µS/cm) and rainfall (mm) (below). Values in lagoa Verde from September 2003 to August 2004.	2009-12-31	Schaan, Andrea B.;Giora, Júlia;Fialho, Clarice B.		Zenodo	biologists	Schaan, Andrea B.;Giora, Júlia;Fialho, Clarice B.			
03FA87827C276B68E2682E4CFBF5F835.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5421042/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5421042	Fig. 5. Distribution of relative frequency of 150 oocyte diameters of 10 Brachyhypopomus draco females with highest GSI values sampled from September 2003 to August 2004. Vertical bars represent the standard deviation.	Fig. 5. Distribution of relative frequency of 150 oocyte diameters of 10 Brachyhypopomus draco females with highest GSI values sampled from September 2003 to August 2004. Vertical bars represent the standard deviation.	2009-12-31	Schaan, Andrea B.;Giora, Júlia;Fialho, Clarice B.		Zenodo	biologists	Schaan, Andrea B.;Giora, Júlia;Fialho, Clarice B.			
03FA87827C276B68E2682E4CFBF5F835.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5421044/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5421044	Fig. 6. Relative frequency distribution of Brachyhypopomus draco males (n = 175) and females (n = 175) for total length classes sampled from September 2003 to August 2004.	Fig. 6. Relative frequency distribution of Brachyhypopomus draco males (n = 175) and females (n = 175) for total length classes sampled from September 2003 to August 2004.	2009-12-31	Schaan, Andrea B.;Giora, Júlia;Fialho, Clarice B.		Zenodo	biologists	Schaan, Andrea B.;Giora, Júlia;Fialho, Clarice B.			
03FA87827C276B68E2682E4CFBF5F835.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5421048/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5421048	Fig. 7. Relative frequency distribution of caudal filament depth levels for Brachyhypopomus draco males. Caudal filaments depth Level 1 = from 0 to 1.5%; Level 2 = from 1.51% to 2.5%; Level 3 = from 2.51% to 3.50%.	Fig. 7. Relative frequency distribution of caudal filament depth levels for Brachyhypopomus draco males. Caudal filaments depth Level 1 = from 0 to 1.5%; Level 2 = from 1.51% to 2.5%; Level 3 = from 2.51% to 3.50%.	2009-12-31	Schaan, Andrea B.;Giora, Júlia;Fialho, Clarice B.		Zenodo	biologists	Schaan, Andrea B.;Giora, Júlia;Fialho, Clarice B.			
