taxonID	type	description	language	source
9F6604729FE967AE446E47F362B84A48.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Male palp with large terminal apophysis, thick embolus, hooked median apophysis and RTA flattened, often shifted dorsally. Epigyne with thick sclerotized lateral pockets and with one anterior hood. Posterior median eyes close together, separated by their radius or less (Platnick and Shadab 1975; Levy 2004). Haplodrassus is most related to Orodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 with three species from the Nearctic, but differs by having a flattened RTA (bifid or laterally expanded in Orodrassus), lacking a median epigynal projection (present in Orodrassus) and by the presence of lateral epigynal sclerites (absent in Orodrassus) (Platnick and Shadab 1975). In terms of habitus and coloration Haplodrassus resembles only two other genera that occur in Crimea and the eastern Mediterranean: Parasyrisca Schenkel, 1963 and, to a lesser extent, Drassodes Westring, 1851. However, Haplodrassus is easily distinguished by having a large terminal apophysis (absent in the other genera), a flat retrolateral tibial apophysis widened dorsally (conical or flat and tapering in Drassodes and Parasyrisca), a broad embolus (cylindrical or hidden in the other genera), and the presence of heavily sclerotized lateral epigynal pockets (absent in Drassodes and Parasyrisca).	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
9F6604729FE967AE446E47F362B84A48.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Holarctic and India (Platnick 2012).	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
04B5F2495FB25E5EFEECAC5A70785D74.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Haplodrassus bohemicus is most similar to Haplodrassus pugnans (Simon, 1880), Haplodrassus signifer (C. L. Koch, 1839) and Haplodrassus pseudosignifer Marusiket al. 1996, but differs: 1) by the shape of RTA having a " step " - like dorsal margin (RTA dorsal margin without " step " in Haplodrassus pugnans, Haplodrassus signifer and Haplodrassus pseudosignifer); 2) by the apically directed embolus lacking a tooth (retrolaterally directed embolus with a tooth in Haplodrassus pugnans, Haplodrassus signifer and Haplodrassus pseudosignifer); 3) by the outlines of epigynal sclerites and relative proportions of the epigynal fovea (cf. Figs 10, 12 and 13, 75, 78).	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
04B5F2495FB25E5EFEECAC5A70785D74.taxon	description	Description. Male measurements (n = 5). Total length 5.8 - 7.5 (6.7); carapace 2.7 - 3.2 (3.0) long, 2.0 - 2.6 (2.3) wide. Diameters of eyes and distances between them: AM 0.10 - 0.15 (0.12), AL 0.10 - 0.16 (0.13), PM 0.15 - 0.22 (0.19), PL 0.10 - 0.14 (0.12), AM-AM 0.09 - 0.12 (0.10), AM-AL 0.03 - 0.04 (0.04), PM-PM 0.03 - 0.04 (0.03), PM-PL 0.12 - 0.16 (0.14), AM-PM 0.12 - 0.18 (0.15), AL-PL 0.10 - 0.16 (0.14). Distances between anterior eyes and margin of clypeus: AM-clypeus 0.18 - 0.22 (0.20), AL-clypeus 0.10 - 0.18 (0.15). Length of leg segments (male): Length of palp segments: femur 1.0 - 1.2 (1.1), patella 0.4 - 0.5 (0.5), tibia 0.3 - 0.5 (0.4), tarsus 1.0 - 1.2 (1.0). Cheliceral teeth: anterior - 2 (little; proximal tooth connected with keel of cheliceral groove), posterior - 2. Abdomen 2.9 - 4.0 (3.6) long, 1.8 - 2.2 (2.0) wide. Scutum is absent. Basal segment of anterior (inferior) spinnerets 0.5 - 0.6 (0.6) long. Coloration light brown, as in most Haplodrassus species. Palp as in Figs 1 - 6. RTA with a " step " (St) on the promargin, terminal apophysis almost straight, without distinct ridge, embolus slightly twisted and lacks a tooth. Female measurements (n = 2). Total length 7.8 - 8.0; carapace 2.7 - 3.5 long, 2.0 - 2.7 wide. Abdomen 4.3 - 5.1 long, 2.7 - 3.1 wide. Coloration light brown, as in most Haplodrassus species. Epigyne as in Figs 10 - 12. Lateral pockets long, sub-parallel, spermathecae globular. Fovea of epigyne without narrow longitudinal groove.	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
04B5F2495FB25E5EFEECAC5A70785D74.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Czech Republic, Macedonia, Greece, Ukraine (Nikolaev, Kherson, Donetsk Areas, Crimea), Russia (Rostov and Stavropol Areas, Kalmykya, Dagestan) (Miller and Buchar 1977; Ponomarev and Tsvetkov 2006; Stefanovska et al. 2008; Ponomarev et al. 2011; present data).	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
1FC1D41AFC1ABE5EDD4218B216FA135C.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Haplodrassus cognatus can be distinguished from all other Haplodrassus species by its straight terminal apophysis with a basal tooth in males, and by the shape of the fovea and wide anterior hood (Ah) in females.	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
1FC1D41AFC1ABE5EDD4218B216FA135C.taxon	distribution	Distribution. It has a trans-Palearctic boreo-nemoral range and occurs from France to Hokkaido, north to north Ural and Tomsk, and south to Greece (Marusik et al. 2000; Helsdingen 2010; Platnick 2012).	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
EA65A976FD5341D7C7DD54776F3707C5.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Haplodrassus dalmatensis can be easily distinguished from all other congeners by the shape of the terminal apophysis with two tooth-like apical processes and by the strong tooth on the embolus in males, and also by the shape of the epigynal fovea with a peculiar medial septum and converging lateral pockets in females.	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
EA65A976FD5341D7C7DD54776F3707C5.taxon	distribution	Distribution. West and Central Palaearctic: North Africa, Europe, South Urals, Caucasus, Anatolia, Near East, Kazakhstan, Western Turkmenistan and mountains of South Siberia (Mikhailov 2000; Tuneva and Esyunin 2003; Levy 2004; Helsdingen 2010).	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
9A8150AAF4DB255B613B95FA8FCB69AD.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Males of Haplodrassus invalidus can be distinguished from all other Haplodrassus species by the peculiar thin embolus with an inner spur-like process, and also the peculiar shape of the RTA, which is not indented and has a claw-like tip (Figs 32 - 34).	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
9A8150AAF4DB255B613B95FA8FCB69AD.taxon	description	Description. Well described by Levy (2004).	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
9A8150AAF4DB255B613B95FA8FCB69AD.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Spain, Corsica, Italy (mainland and Sicily), Turkey, Israel and Azerbaijan (Levy 2004; Platnick 2012; present data).	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
2FA3B5621D53E9C128783A5E24357EEF.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Haplodrassus isaevi is most similar to Haplodrassus dalmatensis but differs by the shape of the terminal apophysis, which has only one tooth-like process (two tooth-like apical processes in Haplodrassus dalmatensis), in lacking a tooth on the embolus (embolic tooth present in Haplodrassus dalmatensis), and also by the proportions of the epigyne. Differences also occur in the spination of certain leg segments: male metatarsus I with two ventral spines in Haplodrassus isaevi, but without spines in Haplodrassus dalmatensis; female metatarsus IV with 4 - 5 retrolateral spines in Haplodrassus isaevi, but with 3 spines in Haplodrassus dalmatensis.	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
2FA3B5621D53E9C128783A5E24357EEF.taxon	description	Description. Males (n = 5) and females (n = 5). Measurements (♂ / ♀): total length 5.4 - 7.2 (6.4) / 5.5 - 7.4 (6.3); carapace 2.3 - 2.9 (2.7) / 2.4 - 3.0 (2.7) long, 1.9 - 2.4 (2.2) / 1.9 - 2.2 (2.0) wide; abdomen 3.1 - 4.3 (3.7) / 3.0 - 4.4 (3.7) long, 1.7 - 2.3 (2.0) / 1.8 - 2.8 (2.3) wide. Length of leg segments: Length of palp segments (male / female): femur 1.0 - 1.2 (1.1) / 0.8 - 1.1 (1.0), patella 0.4 - 0.5 (0.4) / 0.4 - 0.5 (0.5), tibia 0.3 - 0.4 (0.3) / 0.3 - 0.4 (0.4), tarsus 1.0 - 1.2 (1.0) / 0.6 - 0.7 (0.7). Chelicerae with 2 - 3 promarginal and 2 retromarginal teeth in males and females. Number of promarginal teeth varies from 3 (most common) to 2 (seldom). One female studied had one chelicera with 3 and the other chelicera with 2 promarginal teeth. Coloration grey. Male palp as in Figs 25 - 27. Terminal apophysis sharply turned, without ridge, but with tooth (Tt) in subterminal part, embolus without tooth. Epigyne as in Figs 30 - 31. Fovea long, lateral pockets slightly converging, foveal width less that spermathecal span.	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
2FA3B5621D53E9C128783A5E24357EEF.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Greece, Ukraine (Crimea), Russia (Rostov Area), Kazakhstan (West-Kazakhstan Area) (Ponomarev and Tsvetkov 2006; Piterkina and Ovtsharenko 2007; Platnick 2012; present data).	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
542EF03763A281B51880941264F3FB51.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Haplodrassus kulczynskii is similar to Haplodrassus rugosus Tuneva, 2005 from Kazakhstan and Haplodrassus taepaikensis Paik, 1992 from Korea and the Russian Far East. Both species have a toothed terminal apophysis. Haplodrassus kulczynskii can be easily distinguished from similar species by having a much wider terminal apophysis, having a step-like subterminal outgrowth on the dorsal margin of the RTA (in Haplodrassus rugosus and Haplodrassus taepaikensis such an outgrowth is absent), and by the longer lateral pockets of the epigyne (in Haplodrassus taepaikensis they are shorter; the female of Haplodrassus rugosus is unknown).	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
542EF03763A281B51880941264F3FB51.taxon	distribution	Distribution. West Palaearctic - Far East disjunct nemoral-subtropical range: Central and Southern Europe to Urals, Caucasus, Turkey, Eastern China, Far East Russia and Korea (Mikhailov 1997; Tuneva and Esyunin 2003; Helsdingen 2010; Platnick 2012).	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
05E8DD8A57F2E27F46BDC99E0FAD6688.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. This species is most similar to Haplodrassus deserticola from the Canary Islands (Figs 40 - 42, 50 - 51). Haplodrassus deserticola differs from Haplodrassus minor by having a dorsal abdominal pattern (Fig. 66). Haplodrassus minor and Haplodrassus deserticola also differ by the shape of the embolus (thick in Haplodrassus minor, andthin in Haplodrassus deserticola), terminal apophysis (thick in Haplodrassus minor, and thin in Haplodrassus deserticola), median apophysis (short in Haplodrassus minor, and long in Haplodrassus deserticola), epigyne and spermathecae.	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
05E8DD8A57F2E27F46BDC99E0FAD6688.taxon	distribution	Distribution. The species has a European range and is known from Portugal to Ural, north to Wales and south to Crete (Tuneva, Esyunin 2003; Helsdingen 2010; Platnick 2012).	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
A96D7DE7517C0FEA3550AAE99268F064.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Haplodrassus pseudosignifer is very similar to Haplodrassus signifer. The two species have no distinct differences in coloration, size or leg spination, but Haplodrassus pseudosignifer can be differentiated from Haplodrassus signifer by having an almost straight and shorter terminal apophysis and thinner embolus, and by the shape of the lateral pockets and fovea of the epigyne.	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
A96D7DE7517C0FEA3550AAE99268F064.taxon	description	Description. Males (n = 5) and females (n = 5). Measurements (♂ / ♀): total length 5.7 - 8.0 (6.79) / 6.6 - 10.5 (7.8); carapace 2.8 - 3.5 (3.1) / 2.6 - 3.6 (3.3) long, 2.2 - 2.6 (2.4) / 2.1 - 3.0 (2.6) wide; abdomen 3.1 - 4.8 (3.8) / 3.4 - 6.7 (4.7) long, 1.7 - 2.4 (2.0) / 2.1 - 4.2 (2.8) wide. Length of leg segments: Length of palp segments (male / female): femur 1.0 - 1.3 (1.2) / 0.8 - 1.2 (1.1), patella 0.4 - 0.7 (0.5) / 0.5 - 0.6 (0.5), tibia 0.3 - 0.4 (0.38) / 0.4 - 0.6 (0.5), tarsus 1.0 - 1.2 (1.1) / 0.7 - 0.9 (0.8). Chelicerae with 2 - 3 promarginal and 2 retromarginal teeth in males and females. Number of promarginal teeth varies from 2 (frequently) to 3 (rarely). Coloration grey. Male palp as in Figs 68 - 70. Terminal apophysis short (length / width ratio ~ 2) and straight, ridge poorly developed; embolus almost straight and with a tooth. Epigyne as in Figs 75 - 76. Fovea elongated, rectangular (longer than wide) with narrow longitudinal groove.	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
A96D7DE7517C0FEA3550AAE99268F064.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Steppe zone of Eurasia: from Crimea and Nikolaev Area of Ukraine east to Altai (Marusik et al. 1996; present data).	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
EA8CAEF86F6EB9F89FD1425E53386157.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. The species can be easily recognized by the shape of the terminal apophysis, which has a peculiar long ridge, and also by the shape of the epigyne. Haplodrassus signifer is very similar to Haplodrassus pseudosignifer (see the diagnosisfor Haplodrassus pseudosignifer).	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
EA8CAEF86F6EB9F89FD1425E53386157.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Circum-Holarctic polyzonal range (Marusik et al. 2000; Platnick 2012).	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
492C3AD926F52831EAE8FE77EA046542.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Haplodrassus umbratilis can be easily differentiated by from all other Haplodrassus species found in Crimea by its terminal apophysis, which has a broad process (Bp). From the similar Haplodrassus soerenseni males differ in the shape of the terminal apophysis and embolus, and females by having longer lateral epigynal pockets.	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
492C3AD926F52831EAE8FE77EA046542.taxon	distribution	Distribution. West and Central Palaearctic: all Europe, Turkey, Caucasus, mountains of Central Asia and South Siberia (Mikhailov 1997; Helsdingen 2010; Platnick 2012).	en	Kovblyuk, Mykola M., Kastrygina, Zoya A., Omelko, Mikhail M. (2012): A review of the spider genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin, 1922 in Crimea (Ukraine) and adjacent areas (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 205: 59-89, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.205.3491
