identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03FB4676FFD2FF9EFF2A7503FA6031FF.text	03FB4676FFD2FF9EFF2A7503FA6031FF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Gastrodynerus Bohart 1984	<div><p>Key to species of Gastrodynerus Bohart, 1984</p><p>1. T2 strongly reflexed at apex (Fig. 2); digitus long, narrower at the base (Figs 22–25)................................ 2</p><p>1’. T2 not reflexed at apex, or weakly reflexed (Fig. 3); digitus shorter, broader at the base (Figs 26–28)................... 3</p><p>2. Vertex with strong polished postocellar tubercles (Fig. 9); interocellar region elevated, forming two small tubercles adjacent to lateral ocelli; distal lobe of paramere with few erect short bristles (male genitalia, Figure 22).......................................................................... Gastrodynerus vanduzeei (Bohart, 1948) (U. S. A. and Mexico)</p><p>2’. Vertex with weak protuberances, but not polished tubercles (Fig. 10); interocellar region not elevated, without small tubercles adjacent to the lateral ocelli; distal lobe with more erect short bristles (male genitalia, Figure 23)..................................................................................... Gastrodynerus stangei Bohart, 1984 (Mexico)</p><p>3. S3 with strong and deep punctures, some bigger than ocelli (Fig. 13)............................................ 4</p><p>3’. S3 with strong, but sparse punctures, never bigger than ocelli (Fig. 14)........................................... 5</p><p>4. Punctation of clypeus more evident, deeper, homogeneously distributed; humeral region weakly projected (more evident in males); T1 with coarse punctures that are clearly separated from each other (easiest to observe in dorsal view) (Fig. 17); base of digitus with erect and sparse bristles (male genitalia, Figure 25). Gastrodynerus tacubayae (de Saussure, 1857) (Mexico)</p><p>4’. Punctation of clypeus weaker, smooth, more evident at superior portion; humeral region more projected (more evident in males); T1 with coarser, wider and reticulated punctures (easier to observe in dorsal view) (Fig. 16); base of digitus with tuft (denser) of erect bristles (male genitalia, Figure 24)...................... Gastrodynerus searsi Bohart, 1984 (Mexico)</p><p>5 Dorsal surface of propodeum with coarse, wide and reticulated punctures (almost same size as ocelli) (Fig. 11); male unknown............................. Gastrodynerus guatemalensis Grandinete &amp; Carpenter, sp. nov. (Guatemala)</p><p>5’ Dorsal surface of propodeum with coarse punctures, clearly smaller and denser, but not reticulated (Fig. 12)............. 6</p><p>6. Basal portion of T1 with strong (wider on lateral surfaces) reticulate punctures, becoming slightly separate towards apex (Fig. 18). Males: When compared to females, the punctures on T1 even stronger and wider, becoming smaller (although still reticulate) towards apex; digitus very short, scarcely surpassing the distal lobe (male genitalia, Figure 27)...................................................... Gastrodynerus barretti Grandinete &amp; Cortes, sp. nov. (Bolivia, Colombia, Peru)</p><p>6’. Punctures of T1 smaller, not reticulate, homogeneously distributed (Fig. 19); digitus longer, clearly surpassing the distal lobe (male genitalia, Figures 26 and 27)....................................................................... 7</p><p>7. T1 with strong and close punctures (Fig. 19); T2 with lateral margins (in dorsal view) more convex (Fig. 21); same tergum with weak, shallow and clearly separate punctures, becoming stronger and close to each other on pre-apical region (Fig. 21); male genitalia in Figure 28 ................................. Gastrodynerus aimara Grandinete &amp; Cortes, 2019 (Bolivia)</p><p>7’. Punctures on T1 weaker and homogeneously distributed (Fig. 15); T2 with lateral margins (in dorsal view) weakly convex, almost parallel (Fig. 20); with weak and shallow punctures towards pre-apical region (Fig. 20); male genitalia in Figure 26 ........................................... Gastrodynerus yungaensis Grandinete &amp; Carpenter, 2019 (Argentina)</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FB4676FFD2FF9EFF2A7503FA6031FF	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Grandinete, Yuri Campanholo;Cortes, Gustavo Bellini;Carpenter, James Michael	Grandinete, Yuri Campanholo, Cortes, Gustavo Bellini, Carpenter, James Michael (2019): On the genus Gastrodynerus Bohart, 1984 (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Eumeninae). Zootaxa 4671 (2): 240-250, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4671.2.4
03FB4676FFD2FF9DFF2A7154FD6330AF.text	03FB4676FFD2FF9DFF2A7154FD6330AF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Gastrodynerus guatemalensis Grandinete & Cortes & Carpenter 2019	<div><p>Gastrodynerus guatemalensis Grandinete &amp; Carpenter, sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 6, 11)</p><p>Comments and diagnosis. Gastrodynerus guatemalensis may be recognized by the almost entirely yellow posterior surface of the propodeum, and by the coarse and reticulated punctation on the dorsal surface of propodeum (Fig. 11), which is different from any other species in the genus.</p><p>Description. Holotype female. Color: Integument shiny. Black, with yellow marks as follows: inner half of mandibles; two wide spots on both laterals of clypeus; small spot right above inter-antennal region and on upper half of gena; inner half of antennae; stripe along the anterior and posterior margins of pronotum; pronotal lobe; spot on upper half of mesepisternum, adjacent to the mesepimeron; small spot on anterior and posterior extremities of tegula and both sides of scutellum; scutellar crest; metanotum entirely; lower half of dorsal surface of propodeum and posterior surface of propodeum yellow, except for a black triangle on center; broad stripe on apex and lateral of T1; entirely S1; broad stripe on apex of T2 and S2; narrow stripe on apex of S3–S5. Apex of clypeus and external surface of tegula translucent. Tibiae and tarsi brownish. Narrow stripe on apex of T3–T5. Wings hyaline, with costal, part of radial and marginal cells and pterostigma brownish. Veins brownish.</p><p>Pubescence: Short brownish pubescence over body, except for some erect bristles on frons, vertex, dorsal surface of pronotum and posterior surface of propodeum, mostly close to the submarginal carina. Pubescence on mesepisternum, metanotum and propodeum whitish.</p><p>Sculpture: Clypeus with shallow punctures, separate from each other, more evident of upper half. Frons, vertex and upper half of gena with coarse and reticulate punctures. Lower half of gena with weaker punctures, clearly distant from each other. Pronotum, mesoscutum and scutellum with coarse and reticulate punctation (punctures slightly bigger than those on head); transverse line of wider and deeper punctures on apical margin of scutellum; metanotum with some coarse punctures, except on lateral region; mesepisternum and mesepimeron with coarse (smaller than those on mesoscutum) and more distant to each other; bigger punctures along the mesepisternal suture; dorsal surface of propodeum with coarse (wider than any punctures on head and mesoscutum) and reticulate punctures (Fig. 11); posterior half of lateral surface of propodeum with some small punctures; dorsal surface of propodeum with no evident punctures and some transverse striae. T1 with coarse and reticulate punctures, wider on basal half (as in dorsal surface of propodeum). S1 with no evident punctures (mostly due to the yellow color of the sclerite). T2 with shallow and small punctures, slightly wider on basal third and on apex, but all very distant from each other. S2 with shallow punctures, homogeneously distributed, except on basal portion, before summit, where the punctures are almost absent. Incipient punctures on apex of T3–T5 and S4–S5. Coarse punctures (as wide as the ocelli) concentrated on central portion of the anterior half of S3. T6 and S4–S6 with no evident punctures.</p><p>Structure: Clypeus convex in lateral view, wider than long, with two apical teeth; inter-antennal region longitudinally cariniform, with a deep pit right beside the carina, on lower half, and one adjacent to the antennal socket, on upper half; cephalic fovea present, close to each other; occipital carina strongly developed on gena, becoming weaker on vertex and interrupted behind the cephalic fovea; pronotal fovea present and broad; pronotal carina, on lateral surface, strongly developed, weaker and interrupted dorsally on central region; humeral region projected, tooth-like; parategula lamelliform, flattened laterally; scutellum flat; a longitudinal furrow on the dorsal surface of propodeum; longitudinal carina on posterior surface of propodeum, stronger at the base, becoming weaker upwards; a transverse carina between dorsal and posterior surface of propodeum, probably formed due the strong punctures (Fig. 11); submarginal carina weakly projected and fused to the propodeal valve; external margin of propodeal valve rounded; longitudinal carina on posterior coxa strongly projected, tooth-like; T1 slightly longer than wide; T2 longer than wide; S2 strongly truncate at base; row of small teeth on apex of S6.</p><p>Variation: No significant differences were observed. The transverse carina on the posterior surface of propodeum may be, sometimes, difficult to observe due the yellow color.</p><p>Male: Unknown.</p><p>Etymology. The epithet refers to the distribution of the species, which is restricted to Guatemala.</p><p>Distribution. Guatemala.</p><p>Type material. The female holotype (MCZ) is in good condition and bears the labels: ‘Moca/Guatalon/ 1000 m. /Mar. Apr. 31 ’ ‘ Guatemala /J. Bequaert’ ‘MCZ’ ‘ Ectodynerus / ♀ sp. 2/det. R. M. Bohart’ . Two female paratypes (MCZ) bear the same labels: ‘Moca/Guatalon/ 1.000 m./Mar. Apr. 31 ’ ‘ Guatemala /J. Bequaert’ ‘MCZ’ . One female paratype (MCZ) bears the labels: ‘Helvetia, 1.000 m./San Sebastian, Reu/ Apr. 21–22, 1931 ’ ‘ Guatemala /J. Bequaert’ ‘MCZ’ . One female paratype (MCZ) bears the labels: ‘SaEmilia/Pochuta/ 1.000 m./Feb. Mar. 31 ’ ‘ Guatemala /J. Bequaert’ ‘MCZ’ . One female paratype (AMNH) bears the labels: ‘Helvetia, 1.000 m./San Sebastian, Reu/ Apr. 21–22, 1931 ’ ‘ Guatemala /J. Bequaert’ ‘MCZ’.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FB4676FFD2FF9DFF2A7154FD6330AF	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Grandinete, Yuri Campanholo;Cortes, Gustavo Bellini;Carpenter, James Michael	Grandinete, Yuri Campanholo, Cortes, Gustavo Bellini, Carpenter, James Michael (2019): On the genus Gastrodynerus Bohart, 1984 (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Eumeninae). Zootaxa 4671 (2): 240-250, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4671.2.4
03FB4676FFD0FF9BFF2A76BBFB6B37C3.text	03FB4676FFD0FF9BFF2A76BBFB6B37C3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Gastrodynerus yungaensis Grandinete & Cortes & Carpenter 2019	<div><p>Gastrodynerus yungaensis Grandinete &amp; Carpenter, sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 5, 15, 20, 26)</p><p>Comments and diagnosis. Gastrodynerus yungaensis may be readily identified by the weak and homogeneously distributed punctures on T1 (Fig. 15) and by having T2 covered with weak and shallow punctures near the pre-apical region (Fig. 20).</p><p>Description. Holotype female</p><p>Color: Same as Gastrodynerus guatemalensis, except for smaller spots on clypeus; posterior portion of metanotum black; dorsal and posterior surface of propodeum black, with yellow mark only on submarginal carina; yellow stripe only on apex of S1.</p><p>Pubescence: Same as Gastrodynerus guatemalensis, except on metanotum and posterior surface of propodeum which is brownish as well. Submarginal carina with some erect and whitish pubescence with longer bristles reaching the dorsolateral surface of propodeum.</p><p>Sculpture: Small and shallow punctures on clypeus, more concentrated on basal half; coarse and reticulate punctation on frons, vertex and upper half of gena (on basal half it becomes slightly separated), pronotum and mesoscutum; coarse (as in mesoscutum), but more separate punctures on scutellum and center region of metanotum (lateral region without punctures); row of coarser and deep punctures on anterior margin of scutellum. Posterior surface of propodeum with coarse (smaller than on mesoscutum) and reticulate punctation, except around the longitudinal carina where they become incipient. Lateral surface of propodeum with coarse and separate punctures. T1 with coarse (same size of propodeum) and separate punctures, homogeneously distributed, except on apical edge, where there are no evident punctures. S1 with sparse and weak punctures, more visible at the laterals. T2 with punctures weaker than T1, homogeneously distributed, becoming slightly stronger towards pre-apical region; apical region with a narrow stripe without punctures; S2 with the same pattern, except on the basal region (before the summit of the truncate area), where the punctures become incipient; T3–T5 with weak punctures on apical region; no evident punctures on T6; S3 with punctures the same size of S2 concentrated on the central portion; S4–S6 without evident punctures.</p><p>Structure: Clypeus wider than long, convex in lateral view, with two apical teeth; inter-antennal region longitudinally cariniform, with a deep pit right beside the carina, on lower half, and one adjacent to the antennal socket, on upper half; cephalic fovea present, close to each other; occipital carina well developed along gena, becoming weak- er on dorsal surface. Lateral pronotal carina present; pronotal carina on dorsal surface present, but interrupted on center region; pronotal fovea present; humeral region weakly projected; parategula lamelliform, flattened laterally; scutellum flattened; a longitudinal furrow on the dorsal surface of propodeum; longitudinal carina on posterior surface of propodeum uniform along all extension; submarginal carina fused to the propodeal valve, weakly projected and pointed; external margin of propodeal valve rounded; longitudinal carina on posterior coxa weakly projected, rounded; T1 as wide as long, strongly concave on central region, on lateral view; transverse carina on anterior region of S1; T2 longer than wide; S2 strongly truncate at the base; row of small teeth on apex of S6.</p><p>Male: Same color pattern, except for: clypeus smaller and yellow, except for a black stripe basally. F11 hookedshape, narrow, with the apex not surpassing the apex of F9. Male genitalia as in Figure 26.</p><p>Variation: Clypeal concavity between two apical teeth often weaker; yellow clypeus marks often reduced; humeral region more projected, tooth-like. Some males may present small black marks on the center region of clypeus.</p><p>Etymology. The epithet is due to the region known as Yungas in Argentina, where the type was collected.</p><p>Distribution. Argentina (Jujuy, Salta, Tucuman).</p><p>Type material. The holotype female (AMNH) of Gastrodynerus yungaensis is in good condition and bears the label: ‘ ARGENTINA: Jujuy /P. N. de <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-64.93083&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-23.659445" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -64.93083/lat -23.659445)">Calilegua</a>, 1620 m./ 23º39’34”S 64º55’51”W / 24 October 1994 / James M. Carpenter’ . One paratype female (AMNH) is in good condition and bears the label: ‘ ARGENTINA; Tucumán / Piedra Tendida nr. <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-64.93083&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-23.659445" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -64.93083/lat -23.659445)">El Cajon</a> / 26º27’49”S 64º54’32”W / 25 Dec. 2004, 779m. / Carpenter &amp; Davidson’ . Two paratype males (AMNH) are in good conditions and bear the labels: ‘ ARGENTINA: Salta / <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-64.93083&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-23.659445" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -64.93083/lat -23.659445)">Cuesta del Obispo</a> /31 Km. W Chicoana / 22 Jan. 1989 2100m./ James M. Carpenter’; ‘ ARGENTINA: Jujuy /P. N. de <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-64.93083&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-23.659445" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -64.93083/lat -23.659445)">Calilegua</a>, 1620m./ 23º39’34”S 64º55’51”W / 24 October 1994 / James M Carpenter’ . One paratype female (RAM) is in good condition and bears the label: ‘ ARGENTINA: El Rey Natl. Pk. / Rio Los Puestos, 880m. / 6–16-XII-1987, MT, FIT / <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-64.93083&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-23.659445" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -64.93083/lat -23.659445)">Prosopis forest</a>, S &amp; J Peck’ . Two paratype males (RAM), are in good condition and bear the labels: ‘ ARGENTINA: El Rey Natl. Pk. / Rio Los Puestos, 880m. / 6–16-XII-1987, MT, FIT /Prosopis forest, S &amp; J Peck’; ARGENTINA: Salta Province / El Rey National Park, 900m / <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-64.93083&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-23.659445" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -64.93083/lat -23.659445)">Rio La Sala</a>, MT, FIT / 5–10-XII-1987, S. &amp; J. Peck / Open streamside’.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FB4676FFD0FF9BFF2A76BBFB6B37C3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Grandinete, Yuri Campanholo;Cortes, Gustavo Bellini;Carpenter, James Michael	Grandinete, Yuri Campanholo, Cortes, Gustavo Bellini, Carpenter, James Michael (2019): On the genus Gastrodynerus Bohart, 1984 (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Eumeninae). Zootaxa 4671 (2): 240-250, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4671.2.4
03FB4676FFD7FF9BFF2A770BFBE93067.text	03FB4676FFD7FF9BFF2A770BFBE93067.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Gastrodynerus barretti Grandinete & Cortes & Carpenter 2019	<div><p>Gastrodynerus barretti Grandinete &amp; Cortes, sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 7, 12, 18, 27)</p><p>Comments and diagnosis. Gastrodynerus barretti may be confused with G. aimara due to the similar color pattern, structures and pubescence, but the punctation of T1 should be used to separate them. Gastrodynerus barretti has the basal portion of T1 with strong (wider on lateral surface) reticulate punctures, becoming slightly more distant near apex (Fig. 18), while G. aimara has the punctures of T1 clearly smaller and sparser, homogeneously distributed (Fig. 19).</p><p>Description. Holotype female</p><p>Color: Same as Gastrodynerus yungaensis, except for smaller spots on the clypeus and mesepisternum; posterior half of metanotum black.</p><p>Pubescence: Same pattern as Gastrodynerus yungaensis, except for the absence of erect bristles on the dorsolateral surface of the propodeum.</p><p>Sculpture: Shallow and sparse punctures over clypeus; head covered with coarse and dense punctures. Mesosoma with coarse (as in head) punctures, dense on pronotum, mesoscutum, scutellum and dorsal surface of propodeum; sparser punctures on mesepisternum, mesepimeron, lateral and posterior surfaces of propodeum. Coarse (larger than on mesosoma) and dense punctures on T1 (except on basal region where there are some small and shallow punctures), becoming slightly smaller towards apex; small and sparse punctures over T2, becoming coarse and dense on pre-apical region; weak and sparse punctures on T3 and T4; T5 and T6 without punctures; S2 and S3 with small, shallow and sparse punctures, except on apical region; S4–S6 without evident punctures.</p><p>Structure: Clypeus wider than long, convex in lateral view, with two apical teeth; inter-antennal region longitudinally cariniform, with a deep pit right beside the carina, on lower half, and one adjacent to the antennal socket, on upper half; cephalic fovea present, close to each other; occipital carina well developed along gena, becoming weaker dorsally. Lateral pronotal carina present; pronotal carina on dorsal surface present just after the humeral projection, but very incipient and interrupted centrally; pronotal fovea present; humeral region weakly projected; parategula lamelliform, flattened laterally; scutellum flattened; a longitudinal furrow on the dorsal surface of propodeum; longitudinal carina on posterior surface of propodeum uniform all along; submarginal carina fused to the propodeal valve, weakly projected and pointed; external margin of propodeal valve rounded; longitudinal carina on posterior coxa weakly projected, rounded; T1 longer than wide, strongly concave on central region (on lateral view); transverse carina on anterior region of S1; T2 longer than wide; S2 strongly truncate at the base; row of small teeth on apex of S6.</p><p>Male: Same color pattern, except for: clypeus smaller with larger yellow marks; F11 hooked-shape, narrow and pointed, with the apex not surpassing the apex of F9. Male genitalia as in Figure 27.</p><p>Variation: One male specimen (paratype) from Amazonas Department (Peru) presented more extensive yellow marks, mostly on the pronotum and metasoma.</p><p>Etymology. The epithet is in honor to the entomologist Bolívar Rafael Garcete-Barrett, who questioned the identity of the specimens and advised the authors that they might belong to a new species of Gastrodynerus .</p><p>Distribution. Bolivia; Colombia; Peru.</p><p>Type material. The holotype female (AMNH) of Gastrodynerus barretti is good condition and bears the label: ‘ PERU:/ Monson Valley/Tingo Maria/XI. 10.1954’ ‘ E. I. Schlinger/&amp; E. S. Ross /collectors’ ‘ Gastrodynerus sp. /det B. Garcete-Barret 2002’ . Three paratype males (AMNH) are in good condition and bear the labels: ‘ OREJA DE/CAPE- LO (PERU)/ 1600 M. 1.5.1943 /LEG. WEYRAUCH’ ‘[Red label] 467’; ‘Vista Nieve/San Lorenzo Mt./XII.20.1922 Colombia’ and ‘ BOLIVIA: Coroico-/Chulomani, La Paz / III-7-1968 / Garcia &amp; Porter’ . One paratype male (CAS) has the metasoma in a separate label, and bears the labels: ‘ PERU: Dept. Amazonas /19 Km S. Chachapoyas/on Rio Utcubamba / 1700 m. 1.VI.1964 ’ ‘ P. C. Hutchinson /and/ J. K. Wright /Collectors’.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FB4676FFD7FF9BFF2A770BFBE93067	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Grandinete, Yuri Campanholo;Cortes, Gustavo Bellini;Carpenter, James Michael	Grandinete, Yuri Campanholo, Cortes, Gustavo Bellini, Carpenter, James Michael (2019): On the genus Gastrodynerus Bohart, 1984 (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Eumeninae). Zootaxa 4671 (2): 240-250, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4671.2.4
03FB4676FFDBFF96FF2A76BBFDF0369F.text	03FB4676FFDBFF96FF2A76BBFDF0369F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Gastrodynerus aimara Grandinete & Cortes & Carpenter 2019	<div><p>Gastrodynerus aimara Grandinete &amp; Cortes, sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 8, 19, 21, 28)</p><p>Comments and diagnosis. We decided to use a male specimen as the Holotype, because the only female specimen is in bad condition, missing most of the metasoma and wings. Males of Gastrodynerus aimara and G. barretti are similar in color, pubescence and structure patterns, but it can be separated by the sculpture of T1. The former has smaller sparser punctures, homogeneously distributed on T1, while the latter has the basal portion of T1 with strong reticulated punctures.</p><p>Description. Holotype male</p><p>Color: Clypeus with four wide yellow marks; dorsal portion of pronotum with yellow mark only on central portion. Except for these, all other color patterns match Gastrodynerus barretti .</p><p>Pubescence: Same pattern as Gastrodynerus barretti .</p><p>Sculpture: Same pattern of punctation as Gastrodynerus barretti, except on T1, where punctures are coarse and deep, but sparser.</p><p>Structure: Clypeus as long as wide, convex in lateral view, with two apical teeth; inter-antennal region longitudinally cariniform, with a deep pit right beside the carina, on inferior half, and one adjacent to the antennal socket, on upper half; F11 hooked-shape, pointed, with the apex not surpassing the apex of F9; occipital carina well developed along the gena, becoming weaker on dorsal surface. Lateral pronotal carina present; pronotal carina on dorsal surface absent; pronotal fovea present; humeral region weakly projected; parategula lamelliform, flattened laterally; scutellum flattened; a longitudinal furrow on the dorsal surface of propodeum; longitudinal carina on posterior surface of propodeum uniform all along; submarginal carina fused to the propodeal valve, weakly projected and pointed; external margin of propodeal valve rounded; longitudinal carina on posterior coxa weakly projected, rounded; T1 a little longer than wide, strongly concave on central region (on lateral view); transverse carina on anterior region of S1; T2 longer than wide; S2 strongly truncate at the base; row of small teeth on apex of S6. Male genitalia as in Figure 28.</p><p>Female: Clypeus wider than long, entirely black; yellow marks on head smaller than males.</p><p>Etymology. The epithet is in honor of one of the best-known ethnicities of Bolivia, the Aymara, which is also one of the official languages. It is to be treated as a noun in apposition.</p><p>Distribution. Bolivia (La Paz).</p><p>Type material. The holotype male (AMNH) is in good condition and bears the labels: ‘ BOLIVIA: Coroico- / Chulomani, La Paz / III-7-1968 / Garcia &amp; Porter’ . One paratype male (AMNH) is in good condition and bears the label: ‘Coroico/Yungas/Bolivia’ ‘April/99’ ‘[Label with the genitalia and hind right leg attached]’ ‘[not identified information]’ . The paratype female (AMNH) is missing mid tarsi, T3–T6 and S3–S6, bearing the same label as Holotype . The paratype male (AMNH) is in good condition and bears the labels: ‘Coroico/Yungas/Bolivia’ ‘ April 99 ’ ‘[undetermined information]’</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FB4676FFDBFF96FF2A76BBFDF0369F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Grandinete, Yuri Campanholo;Cortes, Gustavo Bellini;Carpenter, James Michael	Grandinete, Yuri Campanholo, Cortes, Gustavo Bellini, Carpenter, James Michael (2019): On the genus Gastrodynerus Bohart, 1984 (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Eumeninae). Zootaxa 4671 (2): 240-250, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4671.2.4
