identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
9E5F035967E898C90128C48FBD624637.text	9E5F035967E898C90128C48FBD624637.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops basilewskyi Matic & Darabantu 1977	<div><p>Cryptops basilewskyi Matic &amp; Darabantu, 1977 Figs 1-6</p><p>Cryptops basilewskyi Matic &amp; Darabantu, 1977. La Faune Terrestre de l’ile de Sainte-Helene. Quatrième Partie, 2. Chilopoda: 345-359, fig. 142 (a-f).</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>BMNH. 891/V P. and M. Ashmole, St Helena, September to December 2003 (18 mm); 6269/V Prosperous Bay 21.ii.06, P. Ashmole (17 mm).</p><p>P. Ashmole’s collection. 1756/V (14 mm); 67/V (16 mm); 452/V (18 mm); 1615/V (18 mm); P and M. Ashmole, St Helena, September to December 2003.</p><p>Preliminary remarks.</p><p>The type material of Cryptops basilewskyi was described from Prosperous Bay, St Helena by Matic and Darabantu (1977). A further 6 specimens from the island clearly conspecific with that putative species are here described. They necessitate a slight widening of the characters of the “species” . Where relevant Matic and Darabantu’s (1977) data are in parentheses.</p><p>Description .</p><p>Maximum length 18 mm (14 mm). Colour: cephalic plate light orange, trunk light yellow with dark grey or black pigment on either side of heart and a narrow lateral strip on tergites 3-20, very little on 2 and 21. Pigmented areas also ventrally on 2-6 (Matic &amp; Darabantu, fig.142 a, b, c).</p><p>Two basal articles of antenna with long and medium setae changing through 3 and 4 to dense short setae with basal whorl of medium setae on 5. Cephalic plate almost circular the posterior margin covered by tergite 1 (Fig. 1) (not covered by T1). Two very short anterior oblique sutures and short posterior paramedian sutures seen in one specimen only (anterior and posterior sutures present). Clypeus with 2 post-antennal setae, 3 in mid region except for 1615/V where there are 4. Prelabral setae 6. Specimen 6269/V with 2 post-antennal and 5 intermediate setae (Fig. 2).</p><p>Forcipular coxosternite very slightly curved on each side with 2 or 3 long to moderate setae (3+3), the innermost slightly further from the edge, and several small setae just behind anterior margin on each side (Fig. 3). Poison gland calyx subspherical situated in anterior region of trochanteroprefemur.</p><p>Tergite 1 without sulci, T2 with weak paramedian sulci occupying posterior third to half of tergite, complete 3 or 4 to 20. Lateral crescentic sulci on 3 to 19 or 20. Paramedian sutures could not be seen clearly in cleared specimens. Sternites with median longitudinal sulcus from 2 to 19. Weak transverse sulci 2 to 19 or 20 (only a slightly curved transverse sulcus). Sternite 21 wider than long, posterior margin curved (Fig. 4).</p><p>Pore field occupying anterior 54 to 57% of coxopleuron, with 12 or 13 pores (5 to 6 in each field). Three to 6 minute setae in pore field in the 2 largest specimens (no setae), 5 to 6 posterior to the pore field and 5 to 8 on the posterior edge (Figs 4, 5).</p><p>Ultimate legs with fine setae except ventrally and posteriorly on the prefemur and ventrally on the femur where they are thicker. Without tubercles or spinous processes. Tibial saw teeth 6 or 8, tarsal 3 (6+4). Tarsal claw without pretarsal accessory spurs.</p><p>Legs 1 to 19 with fine setae and tarsus very weakly divided or not (uniarticulate in holotype, biarticulate in paratypes). With a single accessory spur about half length of claw (Fig. 6).</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Cryptops basilewskyi has only been recorded from St Helena. It is very similar to Cryptops nigropictus Takakuwa, 1936 from Taiwan and the Ryuku Islands apart from the apparently the faint central longitudinal sulcus on tergites 1 and 2 in the latter. This I regard as trivial character and consider Cryptops basilewskyi to be a junior subjective synonym of Cryptops nigropictus (see p. 35).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9E5F035967E898C90128C48FBD624637	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
2A9BAB22EFDBC6EA19A9149251A8769D.text	2A9BAB22EFDBC6EA19A9149251A8769D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops brignolii Matic 1977	<div><p>Cryptops brignolii Matic, 1977 Fig. 7</p><p>Cryptops brignolii Matic, 1977 Frag. Ent. 13: 25, fig. 3 A-F.</p><p>Description.</p><p>( Matic’s (1977) data, some deduced from his figures). Length 17 mm. Colour yellow. Cephalic plate with very short longitudinal sutures extending only a short way back from the bases of the antennae, without posterior paramedian sutures. (Lateral pieces of labrum sinuous ( “fessurato”) with a basal tooth (Fig. 7). Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite with 5 submarginal setae on each side. Poison gland calyx club-shaped and situated in forcipular femur and tibia. Pore field, with 38 small pores and 6 setae, occupying anterior 75% of coxopleuron. Ultimate leg with 5 tibial and 2 tarsal saw teeth (Matic 1977, fig. 3 E shows three). Tarsi of legs 1-19 not divided.</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Turkey.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Cryptops brignolii is, according to Matic (1977), differentiated from Cryptops hortensis by the structure of the labrum: this apparently unique character requires further investigation . Matic’s fig. 3F shows the coxopleural pore field with 6 setae but Cryptops hortensis has a single seta in the pore field also no mention is made of ventral median longitudinal groove on the prefemur of ultimate leg which is one of the characters of the latter species. Zapparoli (1990a) records Cryptops brignolii as a Turkish endemic and it is here retained. Examination of additional material is required to substantiate this and to establish its status.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2A9BAB22EFDBC6EA19A9149251A8769D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
64336C1568685EEF6DCBF52563A9506B.text	64336C1568685EEF6DCBF52563A9506B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops campestris Attems 1952	<div><p>Cryptops campestris Attems, 1952 Figs 8-16</p><p>Cryptops hortensis campestris Attems, 1952 Annls Mus. R. Congo Belge Sér . 8vo, Sci. Zool. 18: 129, fig. 213.</p><p>Cryptops campestris: Dobroruka, 1968 Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr. 78: 212.</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>NMW. Parts of four syntypes on two slides Inv. Nr. 2950 Cryptops hortensis campestris . Rwanda, Rugege Wald [ Forét de Rugege, 2,000 m]. Slide 1. Cephalic plate, forcipules and anterior segments of three specimens. Slide 2. Cephalic plate, maxillae, forcipules and ultimate legs. There appear to be no complete specimens of this “subspecies” although Attems recorded it from five localities.</p><p>Description.</p><p>( Attems’ (1952) data in parentheses). (Length 12 mm. Colour ochre yellow). Antennal articles short, the basal 3 with some long setae, 3 with some shorter setae, 4 and subsequent with shorter setae and median whorl of long setae. (Head plate and tergite 1 without sutures, the head overlapped by tergite 1). Clypeus with 2+1+2+2 long and 2+2 minute setae (Fig. 8) or 2+1+2 long and 5 minute to small setae and 6 prelabral setae. Anterior wall of coxosternite almost straight, with 1 or 2 long fine setae and 2 or 3 small setae on each side (Figs 9, 10) (with 2+2 large and 2+2 or 2+3 small setae somewhat behind the wall). Poison gland calyx subspherical, situated in anterior region of forcipular trochanteroprefemur (Fig. 11).</p><p>(Paramedian sulci from tergite 6, lateral crescentic sulci from 4-19. Tergite 21 without a depression. Sternites with cross sulci).</p><p>(Coxopleural pore field reaches hind wall [of?], with some setae). Ultimate legs (Fig. 12) with fine setae on tibia and tarsi and dorsally on prefemur and femur, thicker ventrolaterally, ventrally and ventromedially on prefemur (Fig. 13) and less so ventrolaterally and ventromedially on femur (Fig. 13). Prefemur without median glabrous strip. Tibia with 5, tarsus 1 with 3 saw teeth (Figs 14, 15) (6+3). Legs with long fine setae, pretarsal accessory spurs small (Fig. 16).</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Rwanda; Democratic Republic of Congo.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>The species has been inadequately described there being no data on the shape of sternite 21 or the arrangement of coxopleural pores, but, as Dobroruka (1968) realised, it is clearly not a subspecies of Cryptops hortensis which, in any case, would not make sense geographically. It may well be conspecific with Cryptops decoratus or Cryptops melanotypus but I currently regard it as a nomen dubium.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/64336C1568685EEF6DCBF52563A9506B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
DE96BDA6054867688480D1614F51E527.text	DE96BDA6054867688480D1614F51E527.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops compositus Chamberlin 1952	<div><p>Cryptops compositus Chamberlin, 1952</p><p>Cryptops compositus Chamberlin, 1952 Rev. Fac. Sci. Univ. Istanbul 17: 189.</p><p>Cryptops compositus: Zapparoli, 1990a In: Minelli A. (ed.) Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of Myriapodology. E. J. Brill, Leiden, p. 52.</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Turkey.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Chamberlin gave only sketchy data viz. length: 20 mm, cephalic plate and tergite 1 without sutures, tergites with paramedian sutures. Pore field with up to 15 pores and extending to posterior margin of coxopleuron. Ultimate legs without spine-like setae or teeth; with 10 tibial and 4 tarsal saw teeth. Zapparoli (1990a) noted that the species is insufficiently described and its identity must be checked. It is here regarded as a nomen dubium.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DE96BDA6054867688480D1614F51E527	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
7589D23EF6913908B4A58AE992ADAB76.text	7589D23EF6913908B4A58AE992ADAB76.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops covertus Chamberlin 1951	<div><p>Cryptops covertus Chamberlin, 1951 Figs 17-23</p><p>Cryptops covertus Chamberlin, 1951 Publ. Cult. Cia Diamant. Angola 10: 107.</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>NMNH. Four “syntypes” Cryptops covertus Ch. ANG 817.2. [Dundo, Forest of Luachimo, Angola]. Specimen 1: 16 mm, is the best preserved specimen and corresponds most closely with Chamberlin’s description. It is here designated the lectotype, the identity of the other specimens being in doubt. They are: specimen 2: 14 mm (ultimate legs missing), specimen 3 (posterior half only), specimen 4: 9 mm. Specimens 2 and 3 are clearly other species. Specimen 4 was not examined in detail. Chamberlin examined 9 specimens in all.</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Length: 16 mm. Without dark subcuticular pigment. Cephalic plate without sutures. Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite bilobed with 5 or 6 stout marginal setae on each side. Poison gland calyx subspherical. Coxopleural pore field, with about 25 pores and several small setae, occupying no more than anterior 74% of coxopleuron. Ultimate legs with 10 tibial and 3 tarsal saw teeth. Legs 1-20 with short pretarsal accessory spurs.</p><p>Description of lectotype.</p><p>( Chamberlin’s (1951) data in parentheses where relevant).</p><p>Length 16 mm. Light orange, without subcuticular pigment but with dark stellate bodies beneath the cuticle, presumably fungal (colour light brown, the cephalic plate and last legs a brighter yellow) .</p><p>Each antenna of 7 long articles probably as the result of elongation after articles lost as suggested by Lewis (2000). Cephalic plate without sutures except for slight traces on posterior margin. Tergite 1 without sutures and overlying cephalic plate. Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite bilobed, with 6+5 stout larger and 2 +2 smaller marginal setae (Figs 17, 18) (marginal setae 5+5 or 6+6). Poison gland calyx subspherical.</p><p>Tergites with paramedian sulci from 3, lateral crescentic sulci from 4 but with traces on tergites 2 and 3. Sternite cruciform sulci not observed (sulci forming a cross in the middle).</p><p>Coxopleuron with about 25 pores of varying size (Fig. 19), the pore field, with several small spine like setae, occupying the anterior 74% of coxopleuron. With 6 setae on the posterior margin and a single seta just anterior to them. Prefemur of ultimate leg (Fig. 20) with fine setae dorsally and dorsolaterally, with spine-like setae (Fig. 21) ventrolaterally, ventrally and medially except for a longitudinal glabrous area medially. Femur with fine setae dorsally, spine-like setae (Fig. 21) and a few fine setae ventrally and spine like setae ventromedially. Tibia and tarsus 1 and 2 with fine setae. Right tibia with 10 saw teeth, comprising 8 and a second row of 2, tarsus with 3 saw teeth (Fig. 22) (Tibia with 4 stout teeth in series below [meaning?], the first tarsal joint with 2. Tibia with a low obtuse tooth on each side at distal end above). Legs 1-19 with undivided tarsi and fine setae. Pretarsi of legs 1-20 with short accessory spurs (Fig. 23).</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Angola.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Chamberlin’s description of the arrangement of saw teeth on the ultimate legs differs markedly from that of the lectotype which otherwise compares well with his brief description. Further material is required to resolve this difference.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7589D23EF6913908B4A58AE992ADAB76	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
E11FDDAF1BF17F11CC4DEC1E42A4BA0E.text	E11FDDAF1BF17F11CC4DEC1E42A4BA0E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops daszaki Lewis 2002	<div><p>Cryptops daszaki Lewis, 2002 Figs 24-27</p><p>Cryptops daszaki Lewis, 2002 J. Nat. Hist 36: 99, figs 53-64.</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Length: 4-7 mm. Without dark subcutaneous pigment. Cephalic plate without sutures. Tergite paramedian sutures complete from 3. Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite slightly concave or straight with 2 or 3 fine setae on or almost on anterior margin. (Fig. 24). Poison gland calyx with very few gland cells, situated in anterior part of forcipular trochanteroprefemur (Fig. 25). Sternite almost semicircular (Fig. 26). Pore field occupying 50% of coxopleuron and with 5 or 6 pores. Ultimate leg with 3 tibial and 2 tarsal saw teeth. Pretarsi of legs 1-20 with a single long accessory spur. (Fig. 27).</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Île aux Aigrettes, Mauritius (Indian Ocean).</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Some specimens, at least, of this very small species were mature and Lewis (2002) suggested that the life cycle involved relatively few stadia.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E11FDDAF1BF17F11CC4DEC1E42A4BA0E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
1798154581710D9AE98121D14A4620F0.text	1798154581710D9AE98121D14A4620F0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops decoratus Lawrence 1960	<div><p>Cryptops decoratus Lawrence, 1960 Figs 28-30</p><p>Cryptops decoratus Lawrence, 1960 Faune de Madagascar 12. Myriapodes Chilopodes, p. 84, fig. 25 c, d, 26 a-d.</p><p>Cryptops penicillatus Lawrence, 1960 Faune de Madagascar 12. Myriapodes Chilopodes, p. 76, fig. 22 a-d. Syn. n.</p><p>nec Cryptops decoratus Lewis, 2002 J. Nat. Hist. 36: 95, figs 27-35.</p><p>nec Cryptops decoratus: Lewis, 2007b Phelsuma 15: 18, figs 17-25.</p><p>nec Cryptops decoratus: Lewis, 2010a In: Gerlach J, Marusik Y (Eds) The Arachnida and Myriapoda of the Seychelles Islands, p. 283, figs 14-15.</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>MNHN. Holotype [Madagascar Sambirano]. Mt. Tsaratanana [Andilabe] 2200 m. II 51 RP [R. Paulian, févr, 1951]. (Forcipules are missing).</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>(Based on Cryptops decoratus sensu Lawrence (1960) and Cryptops penicillatus . See below for description of Cryptops penicillatus). Length: 14-16.5 mm. With or without dark subcuticular pigment. Cephalic plate and tergite 1 without sutures. Poison gland calyx spherical, situated in anterior region of forcipular trochanteroprefemur. Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite almost straight with 1+2 or 2+2 long submarginal setae on each side. Sternites with wide longitudinal sulcus, very narrow transverse sulcus. Posterior margin of sternite 21 straight or slightly concave. Pore field widely separated from caudal margin of coxopleuron, with 6-9 pores and 3-6 minute setae; 5-9 setae between it and the coxopleural margin. Ultimate legs with 4-5 tibial and 2-4 tarsal saw teeth. Pretarsal accessory spurs of legs 1-20 short.</p><p>Description of holotype.</p><p>(Additional data from Lawrence (1960) in parentheses).</p><p>Length 14 mm. Colour after preservation for 48 years uniform greyish orange (yellow with green black pigment forming a central double band and along lateral margins from tergite 2).</p><p>Cephalic plate without sutures. Tergite 1 without sutures and overlying posterior margin of cephalic plate. (Anterior margin of coxosternite almost straight with 1+2 long submarginal and 1+2 shorter setae on each side. Poison gland calyx spherical, situated in anterior part of forcipular trochanteroprefemur [these data from Lawrence 1960, fig. 25 c]).</p><p>Tergites with median ridge from 3 (5-20). Paramedian sutures from 5 ( “sillons” from 5 or 6-20). Lateral crescentic sulci from 3-20 (5-19). Tergite 21 with posterior median depression. Sternites with cruciform sulci, the longitudinal sulcus longer and wider than the narrow lateral arms (the longitudinal sulcus present on all segments, the transverse weak and absent on anterior half of trunk). (Sternite 21 with posterior margin straight or slightly concave). Sternite 21 was not figured by Lawrence (1960) and shape could not be seen in the holotype.</p><p>Coxopleuron with 8 large pores (7-9) occupying anterior 50% of coxopleuron and with at least 3 minute setae in pore field; 3 or 4 fine setae on posterior margin and up to 5 between this and the pore field (several moderately long setae between the pores ) (Fig. 28). Prefemur of ultimate legs with long fine setae dorsally, but thicker setae on lateral, ventral and medial surfaces (Fig. 29) without medial longitudinal glabrous area. Femur with long fine setae, those of medial surface thicker. (End legs with numerous strong setae). Tibia with 4, tarsus 1 with 2 saw teeth (5+2/3). Legs 1-19 with fine setae, tarsi undivided, pretarsal accessory spurs very short (Fig. 30).</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Madagascar.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Cryptops penicillatus (from Madagascar Centre and Madagascar Sambirano) is very similar to Cryptops decoratus (from Madagascar Sambirano, Madagascar Nord and Madagascar Est). These are distinguished in Lawrence’s (1960) key as follows:</p><p>His key, however, does not tally with the text which states that Cryptops penicillatus is without transverse sulci on the sternites and Cryptops decoratus the transverse sulci are weak. These do not tally with my observations on the two holotypes which both have a broad longitudinal and a narrow transverse sulcus and thus do not differentiate the species. I regard the two as conspecific Cryptops penicillatus being a Cryptops decoratus lacking dark subcutaneous pigment.</p><p>NB. Lawrence (1960) noted variation in the intensity of pigmentation of his specimens of Cryptops decoratus, the example from Navana being more pigmented than the others. Both “species” were described in the same work by Lawrence (1960). In such a case the first reviewer is to fix precedence (ICZN Article 24.2.2). Cryptops decoratus is here selected as the senior synonym being the more common form (recorded from 7 localities as compared to 2 for Cryptops penicillatus).</p><p>Other material hitherto assigned to Cryptops decoratus</p><p>Figs 31-38</p><p>Lewis (2002) assigned specimens from Mauritius and the Seychelles (Lewis 2007b, 2010a) to Cryptops decoratus .The material is here reconsidered.</p><p>Description of Mauritius and Seychelles material.</p><p>(The latter in parentheses where appropriate). Length: 10-15 (7.5-14) mm. With dark subcuticular pigment, though very little in specimens from Serpent Island as compared to those from Round Island (only 5 of 15 specimens from the Seychelles had black or grey subcuticular pigmentation the remainder showed no dark colouration). Cephalic plate and T1 without sutures. Clypeus with 2+1+2+6 (Fig. 34) or 2+1+2+2+6 setae. Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite slightly curved on each side with 2+2 or 2+3 or 3+3 long submarginal setae (Fig. 31) (2+2). Poison gland calyx subspherical, situated in anterior region of forcipular trochanteroprefemur (Fig. 32). Posterior margin of sternite 21 straight or slightly curved (mostly with rounded posterior margin, rarely straight) (Fig. 35). Pore field occupying anterior 60-70% of coxopleuron, with 7-16 pores (8-14), 5-8 small setae in the pore field (4-6) and 1-3(4) between it and the coxopleural margin ((0)1-2) (Fig. 36). Ultimate leg prefemora with broad medial longitudinal glabrous area with 5-7 tibial and 3-4 tarsal saw teeth (Fig. 37). Lewis (2002) described the setae on the anterior, ventral and posterior surfaces of theprefemur of ultimate legs as “spine-like” but his Fig. 41 shows them to be just a little thickened.</p><p>Pretarsal accessory spurs of legs 1-20, the posterior 40% length of pretarsus the anterior slightly shorter but sometimes only 12% of the pretarsal length (Fig. 33). The accessory spurs short in Seychelles material, the second very short and easily overlooked (Fig. 38).</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>The specimens from Mauritius and the Seychelles may be differentiated from Madagascan Cryptops decoratus by the possession of the glabrous area on the ultimate prefemur and lower number of setae posterior to the coxopleural pore fields. These differences are relatively minor but consistent. They are clearly very closely related to Cryptops melanotypus Chamberlin, 1921 and are here regarded as belonging to that species although it is known only from a single specimen (see p. 3).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1798154581710D9AE98121D14A4620F0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
291A92A889D3CDF995E188F73A4D9EC8.text	291A92A889D3CDF995E188F73A4D9EC8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops hortensis subsp. hortensis (Donovan 1810) Donovan 1810	<div><p>Cryptops hortensis hortensis (Donovan, 1810) Figs 39-44</p><p>Scolopendra hortensis Donovan, 1810 The Natural History of British Insects 14: 23.</p><p>Cryptops hortensis var. pseudopunctatus Verhoeff, 1901 Nova Acta Acad. Caesar. Leop. Carol. 77: 431.</p><p>Cryptops hortensis pauciporus Brölemann, 1908 Bull. Soc hist. nat. Toulouse 41: 65.</p><p>Cryptops aenariensis Verhoeff, 1943 Zool. Anz. 142:76, figs 7-10.</p><p>Cryptops longipes Goux, 1950 Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon 19: 195.</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Length: about 20 mm. Without dark subcutaneous pigment. Cephalic plate with very short anterior longitudinal sutures extending only a short way back from the bases of the antennae, without posterior paramedian sutures. Clypeus with a pair of post-antennal setae, 4-12 somewhat irregular clypeals and 6-12 prelabrals. Labral sidepieces not notched. Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite barely protuberant, with about four setae on each side on the anterior margin (Fig. 39). Poison gland calyx club-like (Fig. 40), somewhat variable in shape, situated mainly in the forcipular tibia. Posterior margin of sternite 21 slightly concave. Coxopleural pore field with about 30 pores, not extending to posterior margin, usually containing a single seta (Fig. 41), sometimes without. Prefemur of ultimate leg with ventral median longitudinal groove. With 5-9 tibial (Fig. 42) and 2-4 tarsal saw teeth (Fig. 43). Pretarsal accessory spurs of legs 1-20 very small (Fig. 44).</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Azores, Madeira, Canary Islands, Morocco, Iberia, France (incl. Corsica), Ireland, United Kingdom, Denmark, Norway, Netherlands, Germany, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovak Republic, Hungary, Italy (incl. Sardinia and Si cily), Switzerland, Austria, Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Montenegro, FYR Macedonia, Albania, mainland and insular Greece (incl. Crete), Bulgaria, Romania, N-Turkey, Ukraine, European Russia, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan; introduced into United States, Hawaii, Canada, St. Helena; Australia (Tasmania), Christmas Island. Synanthropic in Scandinavia (Sweden, Finland).</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Cryptops hortensis pauciporus Brolemann, 1908 has no seta in the pore field. Pichler (1987) under Cryptops cf. hortensis described specimens from 1,000-1,300 m in Nordtirol, Austria, without the pronounced longitudinal ventral groove in ultimate prefemur seen in Cryptops hortensis and suggested that further sampling would be required to clarify its status.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/291A92A889D3CDF995E188F73A4D9EC8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
5749109BB388122BB43057D93BC11310.text	5749109BB388122BB43057D93BC11310.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops hortensis subsp. atlantis Pocock 1891	<div><p>Cryptops hortensis atlantis Pocock, 1891 Figs 45-54</p><p>Cryptops atlantis Pocock, 1891 Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist [6] 8: 155, Pl. 12, fig. 12.</p><p>Cryptops hortensis atlantis: Kraepelin, 1903 Mitt. Naturhist. Mus. Hamburg 20: 57.</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>BMNH. Holotype. Madeira: Grant, W. R. O. BMNH(E) # 20001 Chilo. 1891.3.8.10. Original label missing.</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Length 20.5 mm. Without dark subcutaneous pigment. Cephalic plate with very short longitudinal sutures extending only a short way back from the bases of the antennae. Clypeus with a pair of post-antennal setae, 12 somewhat irregular clypeals and 9 prelabrals. Labral sidepieces not notched. Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite barely protuberant, with 4 to 6 fine setae on each side on the anterior margin. Poison gland calyx cylindrical, situated mainly in posterior part of the tarsungulum. Posterior margin of sternite 21 slightly concave. Coxopleural pore field not extending to posterior margin, without setae. Prefemur of ultimate leg with ventral median longitudinal groove. Tibia with 15-17 well separated minute saw teeth, tarsus with 5-6 close set teeth. Pretarsal accessory spurs of legs 1-20 very small.</p><p>Description.</p><p>( Pocock’s (1891) data in parentheses where relevant).</p><p>Male (contains 3 spermatophores). Length 20.5 mm (21.5 mm). Colour reddish brown (antennae, head, first two and last two somites and anal legs ochraceous; rest of legs testaceous: rest of somites ochraceo-fuscous).</p><p>Antennnal articles 15[r]-12[d], article 1 with long and medium setae, 2 with in addition a few short setae, 3 intermediate, 4 with small setae and basal whorl of long and medium setae. Cephalic plate with extremely short weak oblique anterior paramedian sutures at bases of antennae. Tergite 1 overlying posterior margin of cephalic plate.</p><p>Clypeus with a pair of post-antennal setae, about 12 clypeals of varying size approximately forming an elongated triangle (Fig. 45). A row of 9 prelabral setae. Labrum not visible.</p><p>Anterior wall of forcipular coxosternite slightly convex on each side with 6 + 4 fine marginal setae (Fig. 46). Poison gland calyx situated in tibia and posterior part of tarsungulum, cylindrical and of moderate length (Figs 47, 48).</p><p>Tergite sutures not seen, paramedian sutures difficult to observe in this darkly pigmented specimen but apparently wanting on tergites 2 and 3, occupying anterior 75% on tergite 4, complete on 14, almost complete on 19 and 20. Very weak arcuate sutures on tergites 4 to 8. (The first three wholly without sulci, the fourth obsoletely sulcate posteriorly and laterally, the rest, except the last, with four sulci; two internal complete, two external incomplete and oblique, the oblique sulci almost obsolete on the seventeenth to twentieth tergites). Pocock’s (1891) terms internal complete and external incomplete and oblique sulci clearly referred to the paramedian and lateral crescentic sulci.</p><p>Detail of sternites 1 to 20 not observed (medially and longitudinally sulcate, the transverse sulcus scarcely perceptible). Sternite 21 with sides converging posteriorly and hind margin slightly concave (Fig. 49). Coxopleuron with relatively few pores (19-20) occupying anterior 70% of pore field. No setae in pore field and none between pore field and posterior margin which bears 6 or 7 setae.</p><p>Ultimate leg (Fig. 50) prefemur with spinous setae on ventral and posterior (median) surface, dorsal and lateral surfaces with a few setae. A glabrous ventromedia l groove. Femur with fewer spinous setae ventrally and medially but more fine setae especially distally. A poorly defined glabrous ventromedian strip. Tibia flattened dorsally, and in distal half with a few short fine setae dorsally and laterally and dense fine setae ventrally and medially: with 15 or 17 well-separated minute saw teeth on inferior edge of flattened medial surface (Fig. 51). The attendant setae parallel-sided and pointed (Fig. 52). Tarsus 1 bulbous distally with dense medium to long setae, with 5 or 6 close set saw teeth (Fig. 53), larger than those of the tibia and set on a pronounced hump. Tarsus 2 with a few scattered setae. Pretarsal claw simple, Pretarsal accessory spurs of legs 1-20 small (Fig. 54). The twentieth pair of this male with dense fine setae ventrally on prefemur, femur and tibia.</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Madeira and possibly the Azores and the Canary Is.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Kraepelin (1903) stated that Cryptops atlantis was differentiated from Cryptops hortensis only by the large number of saw teeth on the femora of the ultimate legs and stated that in correspondence Pocock (1891) had said that he considered it only a variety of Cryptops hortensis . Kraepelin (1903) accordingly listed it as Cryptops hortensis atlantis . Confusingly, he stated that he had before him specimens from the Azores and the Canaries (presumably of what he considered atlantis) with 6-7 tibial and 1-3 tarsal saw teeth. He suggested that further work might allow the identification of geographically separated forms. Attems (1930) may have been referring to Kraepelin’s (1903) statement when he gave the distribution of Cryptops hortensis atlantis as Madeira, Azores, Canaria, Tenerife. I regard these records as uncertain. Material is required from the Azores and the Canaries. Attems (1930) noted that there was also the var. hortensis from S. Miguel, Azores, with 5+3 saw teeth.</p><p>The differences in the number and type of the saw teeth between Cryptops hortensis atlantis and Cryptops hortensis are major and I consider them more than sufficient to return Cryptops atlantis to full specific status. It is worth noting that Lewis (2010b) suggested that the characteristics of the saw teeth of the ultimate legs in Cryptops may allow species recognition before paring takes place.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5749109BB388122BB43057D93BC11310	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
4D5E3485D553BE6ADCEA77D6C1C17C55.text	4D5E3485D553BE6ADCEA77D6C1C17C55.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops inermipes Pocock 1888	<div><p>Cryptops inermipes Pocock, 1888 Figs 55-62</p><p>Cryptops inermipes Pocock, 1888 Proc. Zool. Soc., Lond. 38: 556, fig. 1.</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>BMNH. Holotype labelled Cryptops ( Cryptops) inermipes Pocock type Indian Ocean: Xmas Island Lister J J. 88.96 HMS ‘Egeria’ BMNH(E) 200007 Chilo 1888.96.</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Length 27 mm.Without dark subcutaneous pigment. Cephalic plate without sutures. Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite barely protuberant, with three or four fine submarginal setae on each side on the anterior margin. Poison gland calyx ovoid, situated mainly in the anterior part of the trochanteroprefemur. Posterior margin of sternite 21 slightly curved. Coxopleural pore field occupying anterior 75% of coxopleuron, with about 70 pores. Ultimate tibia and tarsus without saw teeth. Pretarsal accessory spurs of legs 1-20 minute.</p><p>Description.</p><p>( Pocock’s (1888) data in parentheses where relevant).</p><p>Length 27 mm. Colour: brownish orange, cephalic plate brown. Antennal articles 16 [d]+16 [d], very long. Article 10 twice as long as wide (Fig. 55) with an irregular whorl of long basal setae (Fig. 56).</p><p>Cephalic plate without sutures, overlain by first tergite. Forcipular coxosternite slightly convex on each side with 4+3 fine submarginal setae (Fig. 57). Calyx of forcipular poison gland ovoid and situated in the anterior part of the trochanteroprefemur (Figs 58, 59).</p><p>Paramedian and crescentic sulci clearly visible from tergite 3 (second [tergite] with two shallow sulci; the rest, with the exception of the last, bearing four sulci). Sternite sulci not seen but the transverse apodeme is clear (each, the first excepted, with a median longitudinal sulcus, and most of them with a median transverse sulcus, the distinctness of this latter sulcus is variable, and it almost disappears in the posterior region of the body).</p><p>Sternite 21 with sides converging posteriorly with a slightly convex posterior margin (Fig. 60). Coxopleuron with about 70 pores and occupying approximately anterior 75% of the pore field. With two setae in the pore field, one behind and 6 on the posterior margin.</p><p>Ultimate legs now missing (denticles absent upon the under surface of the tibial and proximal tarsal segments of the anal legs). Twentieth pair of legs now missing. Ambulatory legs (Fig. 61) with undivided tarsi (legs, all that remain, remarkably hirsute but none of the segments spiny.). Pretarsal accessory spurs minute (Fig. 62).</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Christmas Island (Indian Ocean).</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>The lack of saw teeth on the ultimate legs would appear to be an extremely rare mutation. The condition has not been reported from any other species in the genus. Unfortunately the fact that the ultimate legs are now missing does not allow confirmation of the condition. It is possible that Pocock (1888) mistook the twentieth for the ultimate pair of legs. The description provided here should allow confirmation of this when further specimens from Christmas Island become available.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4D5E3485D553BE6ADCEA77D6C1C17C55	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
C0503CB44014037E0C5C60664643234A.text	C0503CB44014037E0C5C60664643234A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops kalobensis Goffinet 1971	<div><p>Cryptops kalobensis Goffinet, 1971 Figs 63-65</p><p>Cryptops kalobensis Goffinet, 1971 Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr. 83: 51, figs 1-3.</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>MRAC. Three paratypes 9, 11 and 12 mm. Det G. Goffinet 1970 Congo: Katanga, Chute Kaloba, rivière Lofoi, base du plateau des Kundulungu [alt 1,070 m (Freson, R.). Réf . nº CM 1661]. 2.xi.1968. R.G. Mus. Afr. Centr. 13.135</p><p>Description.</p><p>( Goffinet’s (1971) data in parentheses where relevant). Length 9-12 mm. (With brown subcuticular pigment). Cephalic plate without sutures. Clypeus with 2 pairs of post-antennal setae and 3 intermediate setae forming an inverted triangle in front of a row of 6 prelabral setae. Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite feebly rounded on each side with 2 robust submarginal setae alternating with 2 or 3 small setae (Fig. 63). (Poison gland calyx subspherical situated in anterior region of forcipular trochanteroprefemur. Paramedian sutures incomplete on tergites 4 and 5 complete from 6). Posterior margin of sternite 21 straight (broadly rounded). Pore field occupying anterior 55 % of coxopleuron (with 6-13, but usually 8-11 pores) and without setae. Three setae along posterior margin of coxopleuron and 5 between pore field and margin (Fig. 64). (Ultimate leg with lanceolate setae ventrally and laterally and with 5-6 tibial and (2) 3 tarsal saw teeth). Pretarsi of legs 1-20 each with a single long accessory spur 47% of length of pretarsus (Fig. 65).</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>I regard Cryptops kalobensis, from the Democratic Republic of Congo, as conspecific with Cryptops nigropictus from Taiwan and the Ryuku Islands of which it is a junior subjective synonym (see p. 35).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C0503CB44014037E0C5C60664643234A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
EFDBB7A0A812326A1788821DF8C2C85B.text	EFDBB7A0A812326A1788821DF8C2C85B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops lobatus Verhoeff 1931	<div><p>Cryptops lobatus Verhoeff, 1931 Figs 66, 67</p><p>Cryptops lobatus Verhoeff, 1931 Zool. Jb. (Syst.) 62: 280, Table 3, figs 8, 9.</p><p>Cryptops lobatus: Iorio and Geoffroy 2008 Riviéra Scientifique 91: 84, figs 4a, 6b.</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>(Based on data in Verhoeff 1931 and Iorio and Geoffroy 2008). Length 10-13 mm. Without dark subcuticular pigment. Cephalic plate with incomplete paramedian sutures. Labral sidepieces not notched (unidentate labrum). Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite produced into two elongated lobes separated by a deep incision. Forcipular tarsungulum short, the trochanteroprefemur with 3 or 4 stout setae on its medial surface (Fig. 66). Poison gland calyx elongated, tubular, reaching two thirds of the way down the forcipular trochanteroprefemur. Coxopleural pore field with about 18 pores occupying only anterior 50 % of coxopleuron (Fig. 67) without setae in pore field. With 6-10 tibial and 4-6 tarsal saw teeth.</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Southern France, Italy (Liguria).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EFDBB7A0A812326A1788821DF8C2C85B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
7217F2D6B7FB5FA6C6606B2D162540DD.text	7217F2D6B7FB5FA6C6606B2D162540DD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops mauritianus Verhoeff 1939	<div><p>Cryptops mauritianus Verhoeff, 1939 Figs 68-70</p><p>Cryptops mauritianus Verhoeff, 1939 Zool. Jb. (Syst.) 72: 94, Table 5, figs 23-26.</p><p>Cryptops mauritianus: Lewis, 2002 J. Nat Hist. 36: 91, figs 22-35.</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Length: 15-32 mm. With dark subcuticular pigment.</p><p>Cephalic plate with or without very short posterior paramedian sutures. Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite almost straight with (3) 4 or 5 long submarginal setae on each side (Fig. 68). Not each side with 3+4-4+5 as stated by Lewis (2002) in his diagnosis. Poison gland calyx ovoid, situated in anterior quarter of trochanteroprefemur. Posterior margin of sternite 21 straight. Coxopleural pore field occupying no more than anterior 70% of coxopleuron, with 33-65 pores and several minute setae in pore field (Fig. 69). With 5-8 tibial and 3-4 tarsal saw teeth. Legs 1-20 with 2 minute pretarsal accessory spurs (Fig. 70).</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Mauritius (SW Indian Ocean)</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Lewis (2002) wrote "the small individuals … are very similar to [Mauritian] Cryptops decoratus [sensu Lewis] from which they may be distinguished by their minute tarsal claws [should have read minute pretarsal accessory spurs] a minor but consistent character, and incomplete tergite sulci". In a specimen of 10.5 mm the posterior margin of sternite 21 is rounded rather than straight. The Mauritius " Cryptops decoratus "is synonymised under Cryptops melanotypus in this paper (see below).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7217F2D6B7FB5FA6C6606B2D162540DD	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
A92732DF5208C0432D3DA39703B758F1.text	A92732DF5208C0432D3DA39703B758F1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops medius Verhoeff 1901	<div><p>Cryptops medius Verhoeff, 1901</p><p>Cryptops medius Verhoeff, 1901 N. Acta Ac. Leop 77: 430.</p><p>Cryptops anomalans: Kraepelin, 1903 Mitt. Naturhist. Mus. Hamburg 20: 26.</p><p>Cryptops (Cryptops) medius: Attems, 1930 Das Tierreich 54: 211.</p><p>Cryptops medius: Zapparoli, 2002 Fragm. Ent. 34: 71.</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Greece.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Verhoeff (1901) noted that it was of the size and habit of hortensis but pale yellow. The brief description is insufficient to distinguish it from Cryptops hortensis . It was regarded as a synonym of Cryptops anomalans by Kraepelin (1903). Zapparoli (2002) notes that the identity of this species must be checked. It is here regarded as a nomen dubium.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A92732DF5208C0432D3DA39703B758F1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
53FBFAE842B7DDA04CA3EA22F28A4B03.text	53FBFAE842B7DDA04CA3EA22F28A4B03.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops melanotypus Chamberlin 1941	<div><p>Cryptops melanotypus Chamberlin, 1941 Figs 71-73</p><p>Cryptops melanotypus Chamberlin, 1941 Pomona Coll. J. Ent. Zool. 33: 42.</p><p>Cryptops decoratus: Lewis, 2002 J. Nat. Hist. 36: 95, figs 27-35. Syn. n.</p><p>Cryptops decoratus: Lewis, 2007b Phelsuma 15: 18, figs 17-25. Syn. n.</p><p>Cryptops decoratus: Lewis, 2010a In: Gerlach &amp; Marusik (eds) The Arachnida and Myriapoda of the Seychelles Islands p. 283, figs 14-15.</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>NMNH. Holotype. Cryptops melanotypus C. From Philippines at Honolulu Dec 27, 1937 27-387. [In packing material about Den (robium) superbum from the Philippine Islands].</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Length: 9-16 mm. With or without dark subcuticular pigment. Cephalic plate without sutures. Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite slightly curved and with 2 (3) submarginal setae on each side. Posterior margin of sternite 21 straight or rounded. Coxopleural pore field occupying no more than anterior 60% of coxopleuron, with 6-17 pores, 0-8 setae in coxopleural pore field, 0-3 posterior to it. Ultimate leg prefemur with a longitudinal glabrous area medially. With 4-7 tibial and 3 (4) tarsal saw teeth. Legs 1-20 with two short pretarsal accessory spurs.</p><p>Description of holotype.</p><p>( Chamberlin’s (1941) data in parentheses where relevant).</p><p>Length 9 mm. Tergites 3-20 with dark brown (black) pigment on either side of heart and along lateral edges with patches between tergite 21 with faint median posterior patch. Sternites 2-20 with pigment patches.</p><p>Antennal articles 10[r]-16. Cephalic plate without sutures, overlappe by tergite 1. Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite slightly curved on each side, with 2 long and 2 very short submarginal setae on right and 2 long and 3 very short on left. Those on left appear mostly marginal probably due to distortion (Fig. 71).</p><p>Tergites with incomplete median ridge from 7-17, lateral crescentic sulci from 3, incomplete paramedian sulci from 6 but these latter very difficult to determine as the cuticle is wrinkled longitudinally as seen in specimens in early stages of ecdysis (first and subsequent tergites bisulcate, the sulci mostly complete). Traces of paramedian sutures seen only on tergite 10 and 15 in the cleared specimen. Sternite cruciform sulci not observed. Sternite 21 with broadly rounded posterior corners, posterior margin straight.</p><p>Coxopleuron with 17 pores, 6 beneath the margin of sternite 21, the pore field occupying the anterior 60% of coxopleuron and without setae. Two setae between pore field and posterior margin on which there are 5 setae. Ultimate legs (loose) with long fine setae, a longitudinal glabrous area medially on prefemur. Tibia with 7, tarsus 1 with 3 sharp saw teeth (Fig. 72). Legs 1-19 with long fine setae, tarsi clearly divided from 17, pretarsal accessory spurs short (Fig. 73).</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Philippines, Mauritius, Seychelles.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>The holotype is small and delicate, nevertheless most characters are visible. The absence of minute setae from the coxopleural pore field may be a juvenile character. It has a relatively high number of coxal pores and ultimate leg saw teeth for such a small specimen. With the current state of our knowledge it is, however, not possible to separate it from the " Cryptops decoratus " populations from Mauritius and the Seychelles, described above, which I regard as conspecific with it and hence junior subjective synonyms.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/53FBFAE842B7DDA04CA3EA22F28A4B03	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
AF90748E99B269C20FF907F0C1224138.text	AF90748E99B269C20FF907F0C1224138.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops nigropictus Takakuwa 1936	<div><p>Cryptops nigropictus Takakuwa, 1936</p><p>Cryptops nigropictus Takakuwa, 1936 Trans. Sapporo nat. Hist. Soc. 14: 238, figs 4 &amp; 5.</p><p>Cryptops niloticus Lewis, 1967 Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond. 178: 201, figs 23-37. Syn. n.</p><p>? Cryptops niloticus : Lewis: 1969 J. Nat. Hist. 3: 464.</p><p>Cryptops kalobensis Goffinet, 1971 Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr. 83: 51, figs 1-3. Syn. n.</p><p>Cryptops basilewskyi Matic &amp; Darabantu, 1977. La Faune Terrestre de l’ile de Sainte-Helene. Quatrième Partie, 2. Chilopoda: 353, fig. 142 (a-f). Syn. n.</p><p>Cryptops niloticus: Zapparoli, 1990b Lav. Soc. Ital. Biogeogr N. S. 14: 144.</p><p>Cryptops niloticus: Lewis, 1996 Fauna of Saudi Arabia 15: 146, figs 14-15.</p><p>Cryptops niloticus: Lewis, 2002 J. Nat. Hist. 36: 96, figs 44-52.</p><p>Cryptops nigropictus: Chao and Chang 2006 Norw. J. Entomol. 53: 145.</p><p>Cryptops nigropictus: Chao and Chang 2008 Collection and Research 21: 4, figs 3, 4.</p><p>Cryptops nigropictus: Song et al. 2010 Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 35: 376, figs 1-8.</p><p>Cryptops nigropictus: Chao 2008 Scolopendromorpha (Chilopoda) of Taiwan.VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, Saarbrücken p. 71, figs 72, 75-81+Map 11.</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Length 11-18 mm. Tergites with dark subcuticular pigment. Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite slightly curved, typically with 2 long and several shorter submarginal setae on each side. Poison gland calyx rounded, situated in anterior part of forcipular trochanteroprefemur. Posterior margin of sternite 21 rounded. Coxopleural pore field with 7-25(31) pores and 0-6 setae in pore field and 3-9 posterior to it. Ultimate leg with 4-8 tibial and 3-4 tarsal saw teeth. Legs 1-20 with a single long pretarsal accessory spur.</p><p>Description of neotype.</p><p>(Based on Chao and Chang’s (2008) text and figures). Length 11-18 mm. Tergites with dark subcuticular pigment. Cephalic plate short faint oblique sutures (presumably extending back from the bases of the antennae). Clypeus with 6 prelabral setae. Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite slightly curved, with 2 submarginal setae on each side. Poison gland calyx rounded, situated in anterior part of forcipular trochanteroprefemur. Tergites 1 and 2 with a faint central longitudinal sulcus. Posterior margin of sternite 21 rounded. Coxopleural pore field occupying no more than anterior 50% of coxopleuron, with 10-13 large pores and apparently without setae in pore field. Ultimate leg with 5-6 tibial and 3-4 tarsal saw teeth. Legs 1-20 with a single long pretarsal accessory spur.</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>St. Helena, Democratic Republic of Congo, Sudan,?Eritrea, Somalia, Yemen, Mauritius, Rodrigues, Philippines, China, Taiwan, and Ryuku Islands (Japan). Not French Polynesia as stated in Minelli (2006).</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>The apparent close similarity of Cryptops basilewskyi, Cryptops kalobensis and Cryptops niloticus to Cryptops nigropictus suggests that all four are representatives of a single widely distributed species (see Discussion for a fuller examination of this thesis). Cryptops nigropictus is the senior subjective synonym.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AF90748E99B269C20FF907F0C1224138	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
1250FC66C0FAD36E2D628AFC1EAA2506.text	1250FC66C0FAD36E2D628AFC1EAA2506.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops niloticus Lewis 1967	<div><p>Cryptops niloticus Lewis, 1967 Figs 74-77</p><p>Cryptops niloticus Lewis, 1967 Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond. 178: 201, figs 23-37.</p><p>?Cryptops niloticus: Lewis, 1969 J. Nat. Hist. 3: 461-470.</p><p>Cryptops niloticus: Zapparoli, 1990b Lav. Soc. Ital. Biogeogr. N. S. 14: 144.</p><p>Cryptops niloticus: Lewis, 1996 Fauna of Saudi Arabia 15: 146, figs 14-15.</p><p>Cryptops niloticus: Lewis, 2002 J. Nat. Hist. 36: 96, figs 44-52.</p><p>Material re-examined.</p><p>BMNH Holotype BMNH(E) 200011 Chilo 1996.9.62 Sudan 28.ix.1964. Holotype Reg. No. 1966.9.6.2. Khartoum, Sudan 28.ix.1964. Paratype Reg. No. 1966.9.6.3. Khartoum, Sudan 9.ix.1962.</p><p>Description</p><p>(Sudanese material) Length 16 (male)-20 mm (female). With dark brown subcuticular pigment. Cephalic plate without or with very short posterior paramedian sutures. Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite typically 2+2(3) and several smaller setae some just submarginal (Fig. 74). Poison gland calyx spherical or subspherical situated in anterior region of forcipular coxosternite. Posterior margin of sternite 21 broadly rounded. Pore field occupying anterior 70% of coxopleuron with 10-25 (31)pores. With 5 setae in pore field, 3 between pore field and posterior margin on which there are 4 or 5 setae (these data from 2 specimens only). Ultimate legs with 4-7 tibial and 3 tarsal saw teeth. Pretarsi of legs 1-20 each with a single long accessory spur 54-66% of length of pretarsus.</p><p>Non-Sudanese material</p><p>The brief description of the specimens from Eritrea precludes definite confirmation of identity. They were destroyed in a fire at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria. A male from the Yemen (Lewis 1996), body length 11 mm with 2+2 large and 2+1 small submarginal coxosternal setae (Fig. 75), with only 5+5 coxopleural pores was mature. Specimens from Rodrigues, body length 13 mm, have anterior margin of coxosternite as in Fig. 76, coxopleural pores 7-11, ultimate leg with 6-7 tibial and 3-4 tarsal saw teeth. One of the three specimens had a very narrow median longitudinal glabrous area on the ultimate pretarsus. Pretarsal accessory spur 50% the length of the pretarsus (Fig. 77). Zapparoli (1990) recorded the species from Somalia.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Lewis (2002) gave forcipular coxosternite with 5+5 to 6+7 small to large setae in an irregular row in a diagnosis for Cryptops niloticus as opposed to coxosternite with 2+2 to 3+3 large submarginal setae for Cryptops decoratus . This distinction is difficult to maintain. The setae are likely to increase in length and number with the size of the individual and different growth pattern of different populations may lead to such differences: individuals reach a relatively large size in the Sudanese population with concomitant increase in the number of coxopleural pores. The populations identified as Cryptops niloticus from Sudan, Yemen, Somalia, Rodrigues and possibly Eritrea, I regard as conspecific with Cryptops nigropictus of which Cryptops niloticus is a junior subjective synonym (see p. 35).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1250FC66C0FAD36E2D628AFC1EAA2506	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
E2A855BE4D8F475E34EA030800AECF8D.text	E2A855BE4D8F475E34EA030800AECF8D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops orthus Chamberlin 1951	<div><p>Cryptops orthus Chamberlin, 1951</p><p>Cryptops orthus Chamberlin, 1951 Publ. Cult. Cia. Diamant. 10: 108</p><p>nec Cryptops philammus: Demange, 1968 Biol. Gabonica 4: 292.</p><p>Diagnosis .</p><p>(Data from Chamberlin 1951). Length: 9 mm. Without dark subcutaneous pigment. Cephalic plate without sutures. Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite nearly straight with 3 fine setae on each side. Posterior margin of sternite 21 "gently convex". Pore field widely separated from caudal margin of coxopleuron, with comparatively few pores. Setae of prefemur and femur of ultimate leg fine rather than spine-like; with 4 tibial and 3 tarsal saw teeth.</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Angola.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>The limited data provided by Chamberlin (1951) do not allow Cryptops orthus presently to be separated from Cryptops nigropictus, Cryptops decoratus or Cryptops melanotypus nor from the inadequately described Cryptops campestris from Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo. It is not, as Demange (1968) supposed, a junior synonym of Cryptops philammus which belongs to the doriae group of species. The type material should be examined, however, Rowland Shelley (personal communication) writes " Cryptops orthus appears to be lost, as it is not included in my listing of any museum, including the MCZ [Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University], which also has many Chamberlin types." It is here regarded as a nomen dubium.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E2A855BE4D8F475E34EA030800AECF8D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
2197063D2ABA39B2CAA9C2343DFE9199.text	2197063D2ABA39B2CAA9C2343DFE9199.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops parisi subsp. cottarellii Matic 1977	<div><p>Cryptops parisi cottarellii Matic, 1977</p><p>Cryptops parisi cottarellii Matic, 1977 Fragm. Ent. 13: 5, figs 4, 5 A-E.</p><p>Description.</p><p>(Data from Matic 1977). Length 19 mm. Colour yellow. Cephalic plate with short sutures extending only a short way back from the bases of the antennae and posterior sutures occupying the posterior third of the cephalic plate. Tergite 1 without sutures and overlying posterior margin of cephalic plate. Labral sidepieces notched (tridentate labrum). Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite narrower than the forcipular trochanteroprefemur, each side curved and with four setae. Poison gland calyx elongated, tubular, reaching almost halfway down the forcipular trochanteroprefemur. Coxopleural with numerous pores, the pore field extending almost to posterior margin, with 7 setae in pore field. With 7 tibial and 2 or 3 tarsal saw teeth in a crest. Tarsi of legs 1-19 not divided. (Some data extracted from Matic’s 1977 figures).</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>This Turkish subspecies is not listed in Minelli (2006). In his differential diagnosis Matic gave poison gland very elongated in Cryptops parisi parisi as opposed to elongated in Cryptops parisi cottarellii and tibia with 7-9 and tarsus with 4-5 saw teeth in the former and 7 and 1 in the latter. However he gave 2-3 tarsal saw teeth in his description for Cryptops parisi cottarellii . Iorio &amp; Geoffroy (2003) noted that there are only 3 tarsal saw teeth in immature individuals of Cryptops parisi parisi (less than 13 mm). The differences do not seem sufficient to designate a subspecies, the description is, moreover, based on a single specimen which may be atypical. Cryptops parisi cottarelli is a junior subjective synonym of Cryptops parisi as Zapparoli (1999) suspected .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2197063D2ABA39B2CAA9C2343DFE9199	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
24200CD9EB7B7D0044ECCC9C1AA590D6.text	24200CD9EB7B7D0044ECCC9C1AA590D6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops parisi subsp. parisi Brolemann 1920	<div><p>Cryptops parisi parisi Brolemann, 1920 Figs 78-85</p><p>Cryptops parisi Brolemann, 1920 Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Toulouse 48: 9, figs 1-5.</p><p>Cryptops parisi var cristata Brolemann, 1925 Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Toulouse 53: 194.</p><p>Cryptops parisi: Brolemann, 1930 Faune de France, Chilopodes: 214, figs 351-363.</p><p>Cryptops parisi transsilvanius Verhoeff, 1931 Zool Jb. (Syst.) 62: 274, 278 Table 3, fig. 14.</p><p>Cryptops parisi genuinus var. rhenanus Verhoeff, 1931 Zool. Jb. (Syst.) 62: 274. Syn. n.</p><p>Cryptops parisi cottarellii Matic, 1977 Fragm. Ent. 13: 5, figs 4, 5 A-E. Syn. n.</p><p>Description.</p><p>Length 15-25 mm. Without dark subcuticular pigment. Cephalic plate, with sutures extending only a short way back from the bases of the antennae and posterior sutures occupying the posterior third of the cephalic plate (absent in young animals) (Fig. 78). Labral sidepieces notched in most specimens (tridentate labrum) (Fig. 79), sometimes notched on one side only but not notched (unidentate) in some Iberian populations (Lewis 2009). Clypeus with 8-15 prelabral setae. Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite narrower than in Cryptops hortensis more protuberant, usually with four stout marginal setae on each side (Fig. 80). Poison gland calyx elongated, tubular, reaching halfway down the forcipular trochanteroprefemur (Fig. 81). Coxopleural pore field of 50 or more small pores extending almost to posterior margin, generally with 8-20 setae in pore field (Fig. 82). Prefemur of ultimate leg without median ventral longitudinal groove. Generally with 6-12 tibial (Fig. 83) and 4-8 overlapping tarsal saw teeth (Fig. 84) often fused to form a ridge in large specimens ( Cryptops parisi var. cristata Ribaut, 1925). Legs 1-20 with one short and one longer pretarsal accessory spur (Fig. 85).</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Netherlands, Germany, France, Italy (excluding Sardinia and Sicily), Austria, former Czechoslovakia, Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Montenegro, FYR Macedonia, Albania, Romania, Bulgaria, mainland Greece (including Ionian Is.), N. Turkey, European Russia (Transcarpathia); synanthropic in UK and Ireland, introduced in Scandinavia and Canada (Newfoundland).</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Brolemann (1920) described the coxopleural pore field as occupying only half the surface. Later (Brolemann 1930) he described it as not reaching the posterior margin. Eason (1964) stated that it extends almost to the posterior margin and Koren (1986) that it extends over the entire ventrolateral surface, increasing in extent with size of the individual. Iorio and Geoffroy (2003) examined a large sample of the species and recorded variation in the number of saw teeth on the ultimate legs, the number of setae in the coxopleural pores fields and prelabial setae.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/24200CD9EB7B7D0044ECCC9C1AA590D6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
B55ED3BA4D47E7756F9DCC701F20A8E9.text	B55ED3BA4D47E7756F9DCC701F20A8E9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops parisi subsp. rhenanus Verhoeff 1931	<div><p>Cryptops parisi rhenanus Verhoeff, 1931</p><p>Cryptops parisi genuinus var. rhenanus Verhoeff, 1931 Zool. Jb. (Syst.) 62: 274 (in key only).</p><p>Cryptops parisi rhenanus: Verhoeff, 1934 Zool. Jb. (Syst.) 66: 48.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Verhoeff (1931) distinguished two varieties of what he termed Cryptops parisi genuinus namely var. parisi and var. rhenanus. His var. rhenanus would appear to be a trinomen and as such, being an infrasubspecific category, would be an unavailable name and is listed as such by Minelli (2006). I believe, however, that Verhoeff was using “genuinus” to indicate a typical Cryptops parisi differentiating it from his Cryptops parisi subsp. transsilvanius Verhoeff, 1931. Presumably using the term for taxa with more distinguishing features than his varieties. In a later paper (Verhoeff 1934) he refers Cryptops parisi rhenanus i.e. to what would now be considered a subspecies.</p><p>Characterised mainly by the poison gland pore tube reaching almost to the base of the trochanteroprefemur as opposed to about the middle. Probably individual variation and regarded here as a junior subjective synonym of Cryptops parisi parisi . Locality not given but rhenanus means from the banks of the river Rhine.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B55ED3BA4D47E7756F9DCC701F20A8E9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
E3E7BE5AE3FFF23A357227959A0093A8.text	E3E7BE5AE3FFF23A357227959A0093A8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops parisi subsp. sebini Verhoeff 1934	<div><p>Cryptops parisi sebini Verhoeff, 1934</p><p>Cryptops parisi sebini Verhoeff, 1934: Zool. Jb. (Syst.) 66: 48.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Listed as a valid subspecies by Minelli (2006). Verhoeff (1934) stated that it was like Cryptops parisi rhenanus but with anterior legs with spine-like setae and a transverse row of these on sternites 2-4. Tergite 1 with a round posterior depression and tergites 2 and 3 with a double oval depression. Further information is required about this form which is from Italy (Pisogne). It is here regarded as a nomen dubium.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E3E7BE5AE3FFF23A357227959A0093A8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
34D2E7BC77B2F4443FA81794E1CC1DB6.text	34D2E7BC77B2F4443FA81794E1CC1DB6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops penicillatus Lawrence 1960	<div><p>Cryptops penicillatus Lawrence, 1960</p><p>Cryptops penicillatus Lawrence, 1960 Faune de Madagascar 12. Myriapodes Chilopodes, p. 76, fig. 22 a-d.</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>MNHN. Holotype. [Madagascar Centre: forêt de] Manjakatompo, Ankaratra Mts 2,000 m, I 1956. (Forcipules are missing).</p><p>Description.</p><p>(Additional data from Lawrence (1960) in parentheses).</p><p>Length 16.5 mm. Colour yellow, without dark subcuticular pigment. Antennal articles 12+11, the basal 2 with long, 3 with, in addition, some short setae. The number of short setae increase over 4, 5, and 6. An irregular basal whorl of long setae from 4. Cephalic plate without sutures. (Tergite 1 without sutures and overlying posterior margin of cephalic capsule. Anterior margin of coxosternite weakly convex with 2+2 long and 3+3 short setae on each side [these data from Lawrence (1960) Fig. 22 c]. Poison gland calyx spherical, situated in anterior part of forcipular coxosternite).</p><p>(No paramedian sulci or sutures ( “sillons”) before tergite 7, indistinct on the other tergites. Lateral sulci only occupying the anterior third of each tergite, last 3 tergites without sulci). Sternites with deep wide longitudinal sulcus (on all sternites except the first), transverse sulcus very fine (none). Sternite 21 with corners broadly rounded and posterior margin straight (small, rounded).</p><p>Coxopleuron with 8 large pores (6-8) occupying anterior 55% of coxopleuron and with at least 6 minute setae in pore field. Six fine setae on posterior margin and 5 between this and the pore field. Ultimate legs with fine setae, the ventrolateral setae of the prefemur thicker, without a medial longitudinal glabrous area. Tibia with 6, tarsus 1 with 4 saw teeth (5+3). Legs 1-19 with fine setae, tarsi undivided, pretarsal accessory spurs very small. (Leg 20 three basal articles with a brush of setae ventrally).</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Described from Madagascar, Cryptops penicillatus is very similar to and is hereregarded as a Cryptops decoratus lacking dark subcutaneous pigment of which it is a junior subjective synonym. For a full discussion of this see p. 23.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/34D2E7BC77B2F4443FA81794E1CC1DB6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
0656C708A3B8F9B7817185411EFFCC44.text	0656C708A3B8F9B7817185411EFFCC44.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops philammus subsp. gabonensis Demange 1968	<div><p>Cryptops philammus gabonensis Demange, 1968</p><p>Cryptops philammus gabonensis Demange, 1968 Biol. Gabonica, 4: 288, figs 8, 9.</p><p>Description.</p><p>(Data from Demange 1968). A pigmented species. Anterior wall of forcipular coxosternite almost straight with 3+3 marginal setae with 1+1 long post-marginals. Tergite paramedian sulci commencing on tergite 8. Sternite longitudinal sulci absent. Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite almost straight with 3 long marginal setae and one long seta behind the margin. Ultimate leg with 3, 4 or 5 tibial and 2 tarsal saw teeth. Demange (1968) in a table comparing Cryptops philammus and Cryptops orthus gave pore field with posterior pores near the margin (of the coxopleuron) implying that this is the case in Cryptops philammus gabonensis .</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Gabon.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>The data available are insufficient for the exact identity of Cryptops philammus gabonensis to be determined. It is here regarded as a nomen dubium. As noted in the introduction, Cryptops philammus has a saw tooth on the ultimate leg femur and thus belongs to the doriae group of species.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0656C708A3B8F9B7817185411EFFCC44	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
CB8A587B18902449F4F5706DD98DEF8D.text	CB8A587B18902449F4F5706DD98DEF8D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops songi Song, Zhu & Liang 2010	<div><p>Cryptops songi Song, Zhu &amp; Liang, 2010</p><p>Cryptops songi Song, Zhu &amp; Liang, 2010 Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 35: 378, figs 9-17.</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Maximum length 22 mm. Cephalic plate with very short posterior paramedian sutures, anterior margin of coxosternite with 3+3 long and 2+2 short setae. Tergites 3-20 with paramedian sulci, without dark subcutaneous pigment, posterior margin of sternite 21 straight, coxopleuron with 26 pores. Ultimate leg tibia with 7-8, tarsus with 2-4 saw teeth. Tarsi of most legs more or less divided.</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>China.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Cryptops songi would appear to be quite distinct from other Chinese species of the genus. It is clearly related to Cryptops nigropictus, Cryptops decoratus and Cryptops melanotypus but further data are required to establish its exact relationship to them.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CB8A587B18902449F4F5706DD98DEF8D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
ED2968B6731D73CE16B313C262E76651.text	ED2968B6731D73CE16B313C262E76651.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cryptops stabilis Chamberlin 1944	<div><p>Cryptops stabilis Chamberlin, 1944 Figs 86-91</p><p>Cryptops stabilis Chamberlin, 1944 Notul. Nat. no. 147: 1.</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>ANSP Holotype labelled Type 9921/lot 1398. Cryptops stabilis Ch. Malabar XII-1920 in a small unlabelled micro vial in a larger vial in which there was a second specimen placed in a second microvial and labelled Cryptops stabilis second specimen by J. G. E. L. The two are certainly conspecific.</p><p>NB. Chamberlin stated that the type from Goenoeng (=Gunung?) Malabar, Java was the only specimen seen.</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Length 11 mm. Without dark subcuticular pigment. Cephalic plate and all tergites without paramedian sutures or sulci. Each side of coxosternite with 2 large and 2-3 smaller submarginal setae. Poison calyx oval. Coxopleural pores large, pore field occupying anterior 60% of coxopleuron. Ultimate leg prefemur with medial longitudinal glabrous strip and with 6 tibial and 3 tarsal saw teeth. Legs 1-20 with minute pretarsal accessory spurs.</p><p>Description of holotype.</p><p>( Chamberlin’s (1944) data in parentheses where relevant).</p><p>Length 11 mm. Cephalic plate and tergite 1 orange, trunk light brown with darker subcuticular pigment (head and first and last tergites yellow or orange, the remaining portion of body dark).</p><p>Two basal antennal articles with long setae, third with long and many short, fourth and subsequent with dense short setae and irregular basal whorl of long setae. Cephalic plate without sutures. Tergite 1 without sutures and overlying cephalic plate. Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite curved (widely convex) with 2 large and 2 small submarginal setae on each side (Fig. 86). Poison gland calyx oval.</p><p>Tergites apparently without paramedian sutures or sulci in either specimen (median sulci absent). Lateral crescentic sulci on tergites 3-18. Sternites with cruciform sulci. Transverse skeletal thickening not observable. Sternite 21 in spm. 2 with posterior margin weakly convex.</p><p>Coxopleuron with 14+16 pores of varying size (Fig. 87), the pore field, which is without setae, occupying the anterior 64% of coxopleuron and 54% in spm 2. Two setae between the pore field and the posterior margin on which there are 4 large and 2 small setae. Prefemur of ultimate leg (Fig. 88) with strong setae (Fig. 89) of moderate length on prefemur, some long ventral setae with an elongated glabrous strip on medial face. Femur with some strong setae, tibia and tarsus 1 and 2 with fine setae. Tibia with 6, tarsus with 3 saw teeth (Fig. 90). Legs 1-19 with undivided tarsi and fine setae. Leg 20 with dense setae ventrally on distal half of prefemur and ventrally on femur and tibia. Pretarsi of legs 1-20 long, with minute accessory spurs (Fig. 91).</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Indonesia (Java).</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>If absence of tergite paramedian sutures and sulci is disregarded (possible juvenile character) then the species is close to Cryptops melanotypus .</p><p>Provisional key to Cryptops s. str. species of the hortensis group</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/ED2968B6731D73CE16B313C262E76651	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lewis, John G. E.	Lewis, John G. E. (2011): A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the Old World related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha. International Journal of Myriapodology 4: 11-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
