identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03F987DC8829EE43FF32FF156961FC48.text	03F987DC8829EE43FF32FF156961FC48.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Maimuna anatolica Dimitrov 2022	<div><p>Maimuna anatolica sp. n.</p><p>Figs 1–6, 13–16, 21–25, 28</p><p>M. cariae: Logunov, 2012: 376 [examined, misidentification]</p><p>Type material. ♂ holotype, 2♀ paratypes; Turkey, Muðla, 7 km east of Dalaman, pine forest, 06.03.1977, leg. R . Kinzelbach (SMF) ; 1♂ 1♀ paratypes, with the same data as for the holotype (NMNHS) . 1♂ paratype; Turkey, Antalya Province, near Kalkan village, 04.2003, L. Cook leg. (MMUE, collection number G7535.36)</p><p>Etymology. Named after the Anatolian Peninsula, where the type material was collected.</p><p>Diagnosis. The species is morphologically close to Maimuna cariae Brignoli, 1978 by the shape of the conductor of the male palp, and especially by the twisted lamellar terminal end of its ventral part, as well as by the shape of the epigynal hood and the notched epigynal field. The two species can be separated by (1) the shape of the median apophysis of the male palp that is narrow and pointed apically in Maimuna anatolica sp. n. (Figs 4, 21) vs. more massive and with irregular shape in M. cariae (Figs 7, 26); and (2) the wider receptacles (Figs 16, 25) than in M. cariae (Fig 18).</p><p>Description. Male (Figs 1–2, 4–6, 21–23). Measurements. Total length 7.10; carapace length 3.74, width 2.42; sternum length 1.74, width 1.56; labium length 0.44, width 0.46; maxilla length 0.75, width 0.54; chelicera length 1.39, width 0.67; clypeus height (under AME) 0.34; palp cymbium length 1.47; eye diameters: AME 0.09, ALE 0.09, PME 0.20, PLE 0.09; interdistances between the eyes AME–AME 0.09, AME–ALE 0.04, AME–PME 0.05, ALE–PLE 0.08, PME–PME 0.11; abdomen length 3.36, width 2.00; PLS basal segment length 0.62, distal segment length 1.23; leg I—10.38 (1.48, 2.22, 0.93, 1.91, 2.36, 1.48), leg II—10.64 (1.47, 2.39, 1.05, 1.83, 2.37, 1.53), leg III—10.51 (1.43, 2.28, 0.97, 1.83, 2.63, 1.37), leg IV—12.89 (1.66, 2.78, 1.16, 2.37, 3.46, 1.48). Spination. Chaetotaxy typical for the genus.</p><p>Coloration (Fig 1). Carapace yellow to light brown, with an indistinct lighter area at the middle of the dorsal side and slightly darker cephalic area and chelicerae. Fovea represented by a short dark stripe. Legs yellowish, without pattern, slightly lighter than the carapace. Sternum yellow, with slightly visible darker pattern. Palpal segments colored as legs. Abdomen dorsally light brown-gray with narrow yellowish longitudinal strip and 7–8 short yellowish radial strips. The ventral side uniformly light gray. Spinnerets yellowish.</p><p>Other somatic characters. The cephalic area distinctly narrower and more elevated than thoracic area. The PER recurved (as seen from dorsal view). Chelicerae massive, bulged frontally, with opistognathic position. Three short promarginal and 2 very small retromarginal cheliceral teeth present. The retromarginal teeth positioned against the prolateral ones. Fovea smooth, black, well visible. Trochanters straight or slightly convex.</p><p>Palp (Figs 2, 4–6, 21–23). Without patellar or tibial apophyses. Femur with distinct perpendicular ridge on the retrolateral side (Fig 2). Tibia with elongated ventral ridge. Tegulum brown, with well sclerotized basal part. Embolus thin, starting at 13 o’clock. Conductor large and complex, with wide latero-dorsal projection. Lateral margin wide, forming a deep groove that extends into the lateral projection. The terminal end of the ventral part of the conductor modified in twisted lamellar extension. Median apophysis long with wider triangular base, narrowing apically, with a thin pointed tip.</p><p>Female (Figs. 3, 13–16, 24–25). Measurements. Total length 8.50; carapace length 3.78, width 2.36; sternum length 1.81, width 1.54; chelicera length 1.60, width 0.84; clypeus height (under AME) 0.24; eye diameters: AME 0.15, ALE 0.18, PME 0.26, PLE 0.17; interdistances between the eyes as in male; abdomen length 4.72, width 3.18; epigyne width 0.37; PLS basal segment length 0.63, distal segment length 1.55; leg I—9.96 (1.50, 2.39, 1.03, 1.71, 2.04, 1.29), leg II—9.99 (1.63, 2.22, 0.97, 1.71, 2.06, 1.40), leg III—9.73 (1.33, 2.29, 1.03, 1.64, 2.19, 1.25), leg IV—12.49 (1.67, 2.65, 1.15, 2.34, 3.18, 1.50). Coloration and other somatic characters as in male, abdomen slightly paler (Fig 3).</p><p>Epigyne (Figs 13–15, 24) with wide epigynal hood. The epigynal field deeply notched. The notch long and narrow, reaching half of the epigynal field. Copulatory openings situated under the epigynal hood. Vulva (Figs 16, 25). Receptacles large, with irregular shape. Fertilization ducts ribbon-shaped.</p><p>Distribution (Fig 28). Known only from the two type localities in the easternmost Anatolia, Turkey.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F987DC8829EE43FF32FF156961FC48	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Dimitrov, Dragomir	Dimitrov, Dragomir (2022): A review of the genus Maimuna Lehtinen, 1967 (Araneae, Agelenidae) in Turkey with a description of a new species. Zootaxa 5124 (3): 383-390, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5124.3.7
03F987DC882DEE43FF32FC196DC5F9EB.text	03F987DC882DEE43FF32FC196DC5F9EB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Maimuna cariae Brignoli 1978	<div><p>Maimuna cariae Brignoli, 1978</p><p>Figs 7–9, 17–18, 26, 28</p><p>M. cariae Brignoli, 1978: 506, figs 80–83.</p><p>M. cariae: Demir &amp; Seyyar, 2017: 434 .</p><p>Material examined. 1♂ 6♀ paratypes, Turkey, Gökbel, 30.04.1973, A. Vigna leg. (MCSN)</p><p>Diagnosis. This species is morphologically close to M. anatolica sp. n. by having a similar shape of the conductor and especially the twisted lamellar terminal end of the ventral part of the conductor. The two species can be separated by (1) the shape of the median apophysis, being massive and with irregular shape in M. cariae (Figs 7, 26) vs. narrow and pointed apically in M. anatolica sp. n. (Figs 4, 21); and (2) females differ from those of M. anatolica sp. n. by the narrower receptacles (Fig 18).</p><p>Description. See Brignoli (1978: 506).</p><p>Distribution (Fig 28). Known only from eastern Anatolia, Turkey.</p><p>Remarks. When describing the species, Brignoli (1978) did not depict the most diagnostic ventral side of the palp, hence the identification of the male was problematic. The new photographs and drawings presented here help clarifying its identity.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F987DC882DEE43FF32FC196DC5F9EB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Dimitrov, Dragomir	Dimitrov, Dragomir (2022): A review of the genus Maimuna Lehtinen, 1967 (Araneae, Agelenidae) in Turkey with a description of a new species. Zootaxa 5124 (3): 383-390, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5124.3.7
03F987DC882DEE40FF32F9BE6F72FDD0.text	03F987DC882DEE40FF32F9BE6F72FDD0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Maimuna vestita (C. L. Koch 1841)	<div><p>Maimuna vestita (C. L. Koch, 1841)</p><p>Figs 10–12, 19–20, 27, 28</p><p>Textrix vestita: Pavesi, 1876: 63 .</p><p>T. vestita: Nosek, 1905: 118 .</p><p>T. vestita: Caporiacco, 1935: 288 .</p><p>T. vestita: Drensky, 1936: 28 .</p><p>M. vestita: Brignoli, 1978: 506, figs 49–50.</p><p>M. vestita: Lecigne, 2011: 10 .</p><p>M. vestita: Demir &amp; Seyyar, 2017: 434 .</p><p>Material examined. 2♂ 1♀, Greece, Thesprotia, 06.11.1974, A. Vigna leg. (MCSN) .</p><p>Diagnosis. This species is morphologically similar to Maimuna cretica (Kulczyński, 1903), having a wide median apophysis of the male palp and similar shapes of the epigyne and vulva. The male can be separated by (1) the fan-shaped median apophysis and (2) the large, straight and well sclerotized terminal end of the ventral part of the conductor (Figs 10, 27). The female differs by the wide, oval epigynal plate, wider than the epigynal hood (Fig 19), and the narrow receptacles (Fig 20).</p><p>Description. See Blaue (1980: 46, sub Textrix vestita).</p><p>Distribution. Eastern Mediterranean, Balkan Peninsula, Ukraine. All of the records of M. vestita from Turkey are from the easternmost part of the country, near to the Mediterranean and Marmara coasts.</p><p>Remarks. I was not able to examine the Turkish material of this species but the drawings provided by Brignoli (1976) and Lecigne (2011) leave no doubt about its identity. Since it is the type species of the genus, I provide new photographs and drawings based on specimens from Greece.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F987DC882DEE40FF32F9BE6F72FDD0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Dimitrov, Dragomir	Dimitrov, Dragomir (2022): A review of the genus Maimuna Lehtinen, 1967 (Araneae, Agelenidae) in Turkey with a description of a new species. Zootaxa 5124 (3): 383-390, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5124.3.7
